Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Thrombotic microangiopathy after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is rare after transplantation and is associated with a high incidence of kidney graft dysfunction. Between December 2000 and March 2006, 136 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations were performed with an incidence of TMA of 5.1% (71.4% localized to kidney allograft). All cases were diagnosed during the first three months and were attributed to tacrolimus; 74% were women. Systemic TMA presented higher values of lactate dehydrogenase (2658 +/- 659 U/L vs. 1331 +/- 473 U/L, p = 0.04) and a greater decrease in hematocrit (45.8 +/- 17.7% vs. 19.2 +/- 6%, p = 0.02) than in localized TMA. Acute kidney rejection complicated almost 90% of the cases with 43% of kidney graft lost. Tacrolimus was switched to sirolimus and fresh-frozen plasma was administered. Creatinine clearance after a mean follow-up of two yr was 100.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 57.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in patients with systemic and localized TMA, respectively. In conclusion, sirolimus is an alternative to TMA associated with tacrolimus.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

Pilot Randomized Study of Early Tacrolimus Withdrawal from a Regimen with Sirolimus Plus Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation

We performed a randomized trial to compare two regimens of low-risk kidney allograft recipients in the first year after transplantation. Both regimens initially included sirolimus, tacrolimus and steroids; one with long-term maintenance with these drugs vs. tacrolimus withdrawal. Group I: sirolimus levels of 4-8 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 8-12 ng/mL for 3 months, and 5-10 ng/mL after month 3. Group II: sirolimus concentration of 8-16 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 3-8 ng/mL with tacrolimus elimination from month 3 onwards. Owing to difficulties in achieving target levels, the protocol was amended to increase the doses. Eighty-seven patients were recruited. In the intention-to-treat analysis, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 12 months, adjusted to zero for graft loss, was similar in both groups (58.8 and 59.9 mL/min). Analysis of patients remaining on protocol showed that GFR was higher in group II only in the patients postamendment (58.4 and 72.9 mL/min, p = 0.03). Rates of biopsy-confirmed rejection (BCAR) were 9.3% and 22.7% in groups I and II, respectively (p = NS). After amendment, BCAR rates were 10.3% and 11.1% (p = NS). Diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients who eliminated tacrolimus (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg) (p = 0.03). Combining sirolimus and tacrolimus with adequate loading doses was associated with a low incidence of BCAR, and allowed tacrolimus elimination in a high proportion of patients, which may be followed by amelioration in renal function and blood pressure.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation

The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low-dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low-doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow-up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow-up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow-up, renal function remained stable (mean change: −0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard-dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low-dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low-dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair-wise tests). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low-dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens.     

Early Withdrawal of Calcineurin Inhibitors and Rescue Immunosuppression with Sirolimus-Based Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients with Moderate to Severe Renal Dysfunction

Mammalian Target-of-Rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR inhibitors) can be used to replace the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to prevent progression in chronic kidney disease (CKD) following organ transplantation. Discontinuation of tacrolimus in 136 recipients of kidney transplants with progressive renal dysfunction significantly decreased the rate of loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) (pre-intervention vs. post-intervention slopes, -0.013 vs. -0.002, p < 0.0001). Discontinuation of tacrolimus was associated with a sustained and significant improvement in graft function (pre-eGFR vs. post-eGFR; 26.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 47.4 +/- 2.1, p < 0.0001) in 74% of patients. This intervention was ineffective if the mean and (median) values of creatinine (mg/dL) and eGFR were 3.8 +/- 0.2 (3.4) and 18.4 +/- 1.9 (22.4), respectively, at the time of conversion therapy. During the follow-up (range, 1.5-34.6, months), a total of 13 patients had their first acute rejection following the conversion therapy, an annual incidence of less than 10% and none of these episodes resulted in graft loss. The salutary effects of sirolimus therapy following discontinuation of tacrolimus in patients with moderate to severe graft dysfunction due to allograft nephropathy even in high-risk patients improves kidney function and prevents acute rejection.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.     

Five‐Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing De Novo Sirolimus and Cyclosporine in Renal Transplantation: The Spiesser Study

Calcineurin inhibitors improve acute rejection rates and short‐term graft survival in renal transplantation, but their continuous use may be deleterious. We evaluated the 5‐year outcomes of sirolimus (SRL) versus cyclosporine (CsA) immunosuppressive treatment. This observational study was an extension of the SPIESSER study where deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized before transplantation to a SRL‐ or CsA‐based regimen and followed up 1 year. Data from 131 (63 SRL, 68 CsA) out of 133 patients living with a functional graft at 1 year were collected retrospectively at 5 years posttransplant. Seventy percent of CsA patients versus 54% of SRL patients were still on the allocated treatment at 5 years (p = 0.091), most discontinuations in each group being due to safety issues. In intent‐to‐treat, mean MDRD eGFR was higher with SRL: 54.2 versus 45.3 mL/min with CsA (p = 0.019); SRL advantage was greater in on‐treatment analyses. There were no differences for patient survival (p = 0.873), graft survival (p = 0.121) and acute rejection (p = 0.284). Adverse events were more frequent with SRL (80% vs. 60%, p = 0.015). Results confirmed the high SRL discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Nevertheless, a benefit was evidenced on renal function in patients (more than 50%) still on treatment at 5 years.     

Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) provides superior prophylaxis against acute rejection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) in heart and renal transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this results in improved survival or reduced morbidity after heart transplantation. METHOD: In a sequential study, 240 cardiac transplant patients were treated with either MMF (n=119) or AZA (n=121) both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. RESULTS: By protocol lower cyclosporine levels were targeted in the MMF group during the first year (e.g. 203+/-52 ng/mL MMF vs. 236+/-59 ng/mL AZA, P=0.0006 at 6 months). Patient survival at 1 year (82% MMF vs. 79% AZA, P=0.55) and at 3 years was similar in both groups. The cumulative probability of receiving antirejection treatment within 1 year was lower in the MMF group, as was biopsy-proven acute rejection with International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A (24% vs. 35%, P=0.03). The MMF group also had fewer episodes requiring cytolytic therapy (6% vs. 13%, P=0.04) and more patients had steroids withdrawn by 1 year (66% vs. 32%, P<0.001). Renal function was better in the MMF group with lower creatinine levels at 1 year (133+/-45 vs. 155+/-46 micromol/L, P=0.0004). Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft and Gault formula) at 1 year was also better (MMF 74+/-32 mL/min vs. AZA 62+/-24 mL/min, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that immunosuppression with MMF rather than AZA may allow lower cyclosporine levels, better renal function, and increased steroid weaning at 1 year while also achieving better control of acute rejection.     

A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus

BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. METHODS: Forty consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective study in which antithymocyte globulin induction and 6 days of corticosteroids were administered along with tacrolimus and MMF (n=20) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=20). Mean+/-SD follow-up for recipients receiving tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus were 12.7+/-3.9 and 13.4+/-2.9 months, respectively. Patient and graft survival, and rejection rates were compared to an historical control group (n=86; mean follow-up 41.5+/-15.4 months) of SPK recipients that received induction and tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of recipient and donor variables were similar among all groups. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the 40 SPK transplant recipients with rapid corticosteroid elimination were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. In the historical control group the 1-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 96.5, 93.0, and 91.9%, respectively. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate recipients in the rapid steroid elimination group collectively was 97.5 vs 80.2% in the historical control group (P=0.034). At 6 and 12 months posttransplant the serum creatinine values remained stable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that chronic corticosteroid exposure is not required in SPK transplant recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immuno-suppression consisting of either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and sirolimus.     

Tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) as maintenance immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients

The effects of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine (Neoral) on graft survival, function, and metabolic profile were evaluated in 69 patients receiving Neoral (group 1) and 54 patients receiving FK506 (group 2) for maintenance immunosuppression following kidney transplantation. Recipient and donor demographics and induction therapy were comparable, except for a higher number of sensitized patients in group 2 (n = 13). Acute rejection timing, severity, and infection rates and types were similar in both groups. During hospitalization, at 6 months, and at 1 year following transplantation, no significant differences were noted between groups in fasting glucose, serum cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, or need for insulin or antihypertensive therapy. Mean serum creatinine levels on discharge (1.42 mg/dL +/- 0.14 vs 1.68 mg/dL +/- 0.3), at 1 month (1.45 mg/dL +/- 0.1 vs 1.39 mg/dL +/- 0.11), 3 months (1.46 mg/dL +/- 0.09 vs 1.32 mg/dL +/- 0.14), and 1 year (1.29 mg/dL +/- 0.08 vs 1.19 mg/dL +/- 0.09), but not at 6 months (1.42 +/- 0.37 vs 1.10 +/- 0.07; P = .001), were comparable between groups. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 98.3% for group 1 and 94.5% for group 2. When evaluated for acute rejection, infection, and metabolic differences, we conclude that both tacrolimus and cyclosporine are effective and safe calcineurin inhibitors for short-term use in kidney transplantation. A similar study is proposed to evaluate the long-term effects of both agents.     

Belatacept Combined With Transient Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy Prevents Rejection and Promotes Improved Long‐Term Renal Allograft Function

Belatacept, a T cell costimulation blocker, demonstrated superior renal function, lower cardiovascular risk, and improved graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients. Despite the potential benefits, adoption of belatacept has been limited in part due to concerns regarding higher rates and grades of acute rejection in clinical trials. Since July 2011, we have utilized belatacept‐based immunosuppression regimens in clinical practice. In this retrospective analysis of 745 patients undergoing renal transplantation at our center, we compared patients treated with belatacept (n = 535) with a historical cohort receiving a tacrolimus‐based protocol (n = 205). Patient and graft survival were equivalent for all groups. An increased rate of acute rejection was observed in an initial cohort treated with a protocol similar to the low‐intensity regimen from the BENEFIT trial versus the historical tacrolimus group (50.5% vs. 20.5%). The addition of a transient course of tacrolimus reduced rejection rates to acceptable levels (16%). Treatment with belatacept was associated with superior estimated GFR (belatacept 63.8 mL/min vs. tacrolimus 46.2 mL/min at 4 years, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in serious infections including rates of cytomegalovirus or BK viremia. We describe the development of a costimulatory blockade‐based strategy that ultimately allows renal transplant recipients to achieve calcineurin inhibitor–free immunosuppression.     

Impact of Portal Venous Pancreas Graft Drainage on Kidney Graft Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Recipients Reported to UNOS

Clinical data on the potential immunologic impact of portal (PD) vs. systemic (SD) venous pancreas graft drainage on outcome remains controversial. We reviewed the UNOS database to study the effect of PD vs. SD on the incidence of kidney graft rejection and survival in first cadaveric simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients transplanted 1994-2001. We studied three groups: all SPK (n=6629, 13% PD) (group I), SPK on tacrolimus (n=3563, 17% PD) (group II), and SPK on tacrolimus performed at centers with significant PD experience (n=948, 46% PD) (group III). The cumulative kidney graft rejection incidence for PD vs. SD was only significantly different in group I (for PD vs. SD, respectively: at 6 months, 31% vs. 36% [p=0.015]; at 1 year, 37% vs. 43% [p=0.006]). Kidney graft survival was similar in all groups for PD vs. SD. Multivariate analysis of group III showed only transplantation during the earlier era (1994-96), but not SD, to be an independent risk factor for kidney graft rejection. Portal venous pancreas graft drainage does not affect kidney graft rejection and survival in SPK recipients on tacrolimus. Our data suggests that the efficacy of current immunosuppressive protocols and increasing center experience are clinically much more relevant than any potential immunologic advantage of portal venous drainage in SPK recipients.     

Late conversion of tacrolimus to sirolimus in a prednisone‐free immunosuppression regimen in renal transplant patients

Chhabra D, Grafals M, Cabral B, Leventhal J, Parker M, Gallon L. Late conversion of tacrolimus to sirolimus in a prednisone‐free immunosuppression regimen in renal transplant patients.
Clin Transplant 2009: DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01047.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: One of the most important causes of graft loss is chronic nephrotoxicity from calcineurin inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and to assess the impact on rejection risk, graft loss and renal allograft function of converting patients from tacrolimus (Tac) to sirolimus (SRL) at one yr post‐transplantation (Tx) using a prednisone‐free immunosuppressive regimen. Methods: Two hundred fifty‐five kidney transplant patients were induced with Alemtuzumab and maintained on a steroid‐free regimen with Tac and mycophenolate mofetil. Thirty‐seven stable patients (14%) were converted from Tac to SRL at one yr post‐Tx. Results: The two groups were demographically similar. Mean post‐tx follow‐up was 2.8 ± 0.2 yr. Patient and graft survival were not statistically different. There was no significant difference in acute rejection episodes between the SRL and Tac groups (21% vs. 15%, p = 0.2). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), in the SRL group at 2.8 yr post‐tx, was 69 ± 13 mL/min from the one month post‐tx GFR of 53 ± 19 and 59 ± 23 mL/min from the one month post‐tx GFR of 56 ± 21 mL/min in the Tac group. Conclusions: Using a prednisone‐free regimen, the conversion of Tac to SRL at one yr post‐Tx was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection or graft loss.     

Comparison of sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor-sparing and calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in cadaveric renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the efficacy and toxicity of sirolimus used as primary immunosuppression in combination with reduced dose tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitor [CI]-sparing regimen) or mycophenolate mofetil (CI-free regimen) in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation. METHODS: Seventy subjects were treated in a quadruple sequential protocol in which 41 were treated with a CI-sparing regimen and 29 were treated with a CI-free regimen. The efficacy and toxicity profiles of these regimens were prospectively monitored and compared. RESULTS: The study consisted of African Americans (71%), cadaveric donors (100%), donors aged more than 50 years (30%), and patients with delayed graft function (47%). At 1 year, patient survival, graft survival, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 98%, 80%, and 10%, respectively, in the CI-sparing group and 100%, 89%, and 7%, respectively, in the CI-free group. Three-month protocol biopsies were performed in 41% (17/41) and 67% (20/29) of the subjects in the CI-sparing and CI-free groups, respectively. Subclinical rejection was detected in 6% (1/17) and 15% (3/20) of the subjects in the CI-sparing and CI-free groups, respectively. Histologic evidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was more prevalent in the CI-sparing group. At 1 year, the mean estimated creatinine clearance was higher in the CI-free group than in the CI-sparing group (72.4 +/-20.0 mL/min vs. 50.5 +/-20.8 mL/min, P <0.01). The two regimens had similar toxicity profiles (hospital readmission, infection, wound complications, and metabolic complications). CONCLUSIONS: Both sirolimus-based CI-sparing and CI-free regimens are safe and effective in a population with high immunologic risk. The CI-free regimen is associated with better renal function at 1 year post-transplant. Long-term follow-up will aid in determining the risk and benefit ratio of these regimens.     

Sirolimus delays recovery from posttransplant renal failure in kidney graft recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sirolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) combined therapy on the incidence and duration of delayed graft function (DGF), and the impact of the latter on 1-year graft function. The study entailed 23 cadaveric renal recipients treated with sirolimus-CsA-prednisone regimen (sirolimus group). The reference group entailed 23 patients treated with CsA-azathioprine-prednisone. In the sirolimus group the frequency of DGF was 39% and was essentially the same as in reference group (34.8%). The duration of DGF was significantly longer in SRL group and lasted 21.2 +/- 12.2 days versus 6.8 +/- 2.5 in reference group (P = .004). Serum creatinine level decreased below 3.0 mg/dL after 36 +/- 22 days in sirolimus group versus 16.8 +/- 6 days in reference group (P < .04). Cold ischemia was slightly longer and donors were older in DGF patients in both groups. Sirolimus dose during first month was higher in DGF patients (3.5 versus 2.6 mg), whereas level of CsA was lower (230 versus 310 ng/mL). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) occurred in most of DGF patients and during the DGF period. Serum creatinine level at the 12th month posttransplant was higher in DGF versus non-DGF patients (2.0 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL). One-year patient and graft survival was 100% in sirolimus group and 100% and 95% in reference group. In conclusion, sirolimus significantly retards the recovery from posttransplant renal failure; however, it does not increase the incidence of DGF. Patients who suffered from posttransplant acute renal failure had worse renal function at 1 year after transplantation, independent of the treatment protocol.     

Sirolimus Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Recipients Receiving Thymoglobulin®, Mycophenolate Mofetil and a 6-Month Course of Steroids

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen, 145 renal recipients were prospectively randomized to receive either sirolimus (n = 71) or cyclosporine (CsA; n = 74). All patients received polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (6 months). The primary endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly different at 12 months comparing sirolimus- and CsA-treated patients (60 +/- 27 vs. 57 +/- 21 mL/min). At 12 months, patient and graft survival, incidence of biopsy-proven rejection and rates of steroid withdrawal were not statistically different (97% vs. 97%; 90% vs. 93%; 14.3% vs. 8.6% and 82.8% vs. 84.1%, respectively). Delayed and slow graft function (SGF) was not significantly different (18.6% vs. 12.3% and 11.4% vs. 13.7%, respectively). In patients who remained on treatment according to protocol at 12 months, eGFR was significantly higher with sirolimus (69 +/- 19 vs. 60 +/- 14 mL/min, p = 0.01). Overall study drug discontinuation rates were 28.2% with sirolimus and 14.9% with CsA. Adverse events (wound complications, mouth ulcers, diarrhea, hypokalemia, bronchopneumonia) and proteinuria >0.5 g/24h (38.8% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in sirolimus-treated patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections were significantly less frequent with sirolimus (6% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). A CNI-free regimen using sirolimus-MMF can achieve excellent renal function, but patients on sirolimus experienced a high rate of adverse events and study drug discontinuation.     

A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year

BACKGROUND: To reduce long-term nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitor dosage, adjunctive sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was used in a 150-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor first renal transplant recipients (n=50/group). METHODS: Group A received tacrolimus and sirolimus. Target tacrolimus trough levels postoperatively were 10, 8, and 6 ng/mL at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Group B received tacrolimus and MMF. Target tacrolimus trough levels were 10 and 8 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year, with a targeted dose of MMF of 1 g twice daily. Group C received cyclosporine A (CsA) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and sirolimus with target CsA trough levels of 225 and 175 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year. Maintenance sirolimus target trough levels were 8 ng/mL in groups A and C. Each group received daclizumab induction and methylprednisolone maintenance. This first of two companion 1-year reports details demographics, drug-dosing interactions, and rejection. RESULTS: There were no notable differences in group demographics, but a somewhat less favorable course occurred in group C, despite higher bioavailability of sirolimus in group C versus group A (P<0.001). Acute rejection rates were lower in groups A (4%) and B (4%) combined versus group C (14%) (P=0.03). Histopathologic findings were supported by comparing perioperative with 1-year postoperative protocol biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year interim analysis indicates that a decreasing dosage of tacrolimus with either adjunctive sirolimus or MMF may optimize future graft survival versus a less favorable outcome using a similar algorithm with CsA and sirolimus.     

Concentration-controlled use of sirolimus associated with reduced exposure of cyclosporine in black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors: 12-month results

AIM: This study was designed to identify optimal therapeutic sirolimus (SRL) concentrations in black kidney transplant recipients on reduced cyclosporine (CsA) exposure and prednisone. METHODS: Seventy patients (64 living/six deceased) received CsA (8-10 mg/kg/d), prednisone, and 15 mg loading dose followed by 5-mg fixed doses of SRL till day 7 when they were randomized to maintain SRL trough concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography) of 8-12 (GI = 34) or 15-20 (GII = 36) ng/mL. RESULTS: Mean CsA concentrations were 109 +/- 53 vs. 89 +/- 41 ng/mL and 75 +/- 54 vs. 60 +/- 35 ng/mL (ns) at 2 and 6 months. Accordingly, mean SRL trough concentrations were 12.4 +/- 6.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001) and 10.8 +/- 5.8 vs. 18.0 +/- 6.1 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection [13% (GI: 18% vs. GII: 8%, ns)], graft loss or death was 16% (GI: 21% vs. GII: 11%, ns]. There were no deaths and three graft losses (GI = 1; GII = 2). Creatinine clearance was higher in GI (64.5 +/- 17 vs. 54.4 +/- 14.7 mL/min, p = 0.011). The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 13% and no CMV disease was observed. CONCLUSION: In black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors reduced CsA exposure and SRL concentration-controlled regimens produced low incidences of acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and CMV disease, with no significant impairment in graft function.     

Renal transplantation in children managed with lymphocyte depleting agents and low-dose maintenance tacrolimus monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: Describe the safety and efficacy of antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab preconditioning, steroid avoidance and reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression in 34 children undergoing renal transplantation. METHODS: ATG (n=8) or alemtuzumab (n=26) were infused at the time of transplantation. This was followed by low-dose twice a day tacrolimus monotherapy with consolidation to once daily dosing by 6 months and once every other day dosing by 12 months. Follow-up ranged from 0.5-2.9 years (mean 1.33 years), with a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: Both ATG and alemtuzumab were well tolerated. Lymphopenia occurred routinely and resolved after 3-6 months. Acute cellular rejection occurred in 9%; it was related to medical nonadherence in two patients and resulted in one graft loss at 1.5 years. Important adverse events included transient neutropenia in 10 children (none with serious infection), and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in two (resolved with a steroid course in both and conversion to sirolimus in one). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was stable and averaged 88 mL/min/1.73 m2 at latest follow-up. Fifteen preadolescents had a greater increase in height Z-score at 1 year (1.3 vs. 0.5, P=0.001), and a higher e-GFR (94.8+/-21 vs. 76.6+/-20 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.05), when compared to case-matched historical controls who were weaned off steroids by 6 months after transplantation and received twice daily tacrolimus monotherapy. CONCLUSION: This simple regimen appears safe, has a low risk for acute cellular rejection or other adverse effects, and is associated with excellent growth and renal function. Such a regimen may also improve compliance and limit CNI nephrotoxicity.