New evidence regarding hormone replacement therapies is urgently required transdermal postmenopausal hormone therapy differs from oral hormone therapy in risks and benefits

Controversies about the safety of different postmenopausal hormone therapies (HTs) started 30 years ago and reached a peak in 2003 after the publication of the results from the Women Health Initiative (WHI) trial and the Million Women Study (MWS) [Writing group for the women's health initiative investigations. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. JAMA 2002;288:321-33; Million women study collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 2003;362:419-27]. The single HT formulation used in the WHI trial for non hysterectomized women-an association of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE-0.625 mg/day) and a synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA-2.5 mg/day)-increases the risks of venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, stroke and breast cancer. The MWS, an observational study, showed an increased breast cancer risk in users of estrogens combined with either medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethisterone, or norgestrel. It is unclear and questionable to what extent these results might be extrapolated to other HRT regimens, that differ in their doses, compositions and administration routes, and that were not assessed in the WHI trial and the MWS. Significant results were achieved with the publication of the WHI estrogen-only arm study [Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712] in which hormone therapy was reserved to women who had carried out hysterectomy. What emerged from this study will allow us to have some important argument to develop.     

HRT, osteoporosis and regulatory authorities Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

HRT has been widely used for the relief of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. However, following the publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and the Million Women Study (MWS), regulatory authorities issued an urgent safety restriction on HRT use in preventing post-menopausal osteoporosis, recommending that it now be considered a second-line treatment. Are such recommendations justified? Treatments for osteoporosis, in women with increased future risk for fractures but who have not yet developed the disease, should prevent all types of osteoporotic fractures. Of the available therapies, none other than HRT has been clearly demonstrated to prevent hip fractures in such women. Thus, HRT should be recommended as first-line treatment for osteoporosis prevention. Potential risks of HRT, such as increased development of breast cancer and increased thromboembolism, have long been known. The WHI showed risks in less than 0.3% of women studied, and the MWS appears to have overestimated the risk of breast cancer. Thus, no new safety issues have been identified, and the regulatory authorities may have misinterpreted the data from these recent studies. When given for the correct indications, HRT is of major benefit to many women.     

The incidence of breast cancer and changes in the use of hormone replacement therapy: A review of the evidence

Even though a link between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer has been well documented in the epidemiological literature since the 1980s, it was not until publication of the results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2002 and the Million Women Study in 2003 that women and doctors started reconsidering the use of HRT and sales of HRT started to drop. This paper evaluates the impact of the publication of these two landmark studies on the expected and observed changes in the incidence of breast cancer.Between 2001–2002 and 2005–2006, sharp and significant reductions in the incidence of breast cancer of up to 22% were reported in many US and European populations, temporally consistent with the drop in usage of HRT. Declines in the rates of breast cancer were strongest for 50–60-year-old women (those most likely to be current users of HRT), affected mainly ER+ and PR+ cancers (those most strongly associated with HRT use), and were largest among women with the highest pre-decline prevalence of HRT use and the sharpest decline in its use.A considerable amount of scientific evidence supports the hypothesis that the decline in the incidence of breast cancer is in large part attributable to the sudden drop in HRT use following publication of the WHI and Million Women studies. Nevertheless, the problem of how to advise women contemplating HRT use today remains. Medical relief will remain necessary for many women with menopausal complaints, and so new therapeutic options need to be explored.     

Menopausal symptoms after cessation of hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of recurrent menopausal symptoms among post-menopausal women who discontinued hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after the publication of the women's health initiative (WHI) study and to describe the therapeutic strategies employed to address these symptoms. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1000 post-menopausal women seen consecutively at an internal medicine practice from January 2004 to May 2004. RESULTS: Among 1000 post-menopausal women, 205 (21%) had discontinued HRT due to the WHI results. Menopausal symptoms were present in 91/205 (44%) women, with 52/205 (25%) having vasomotor symptoms, 51/205 (25%) urogenital complaints, and 10/205 (5%) mood-related symptoms. Out of the 91 symptomatic women, only 55 (60%) received therapy to relieve their symptoms. The most commonly employed treatments were topical estrogen in 33/91 (36%) women, complementary therapies in 18/91 (20%) women, and venlafaxine in 13/91 (14%) women. Among complementary therapies, the most frequent were black cohosh used by 8/91 (9%) women and soy by 7/91 (8%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Many post-menopausal women developed typical menopausal symptoms after discontinuation of HRT, with vasomotor and urogenital complaints being the most commonly reported. Topical estrogen, complementary therapies, and venlafaxine were the most usual treatments for menopausal symptoms. However, a large number of symptomatic women remained untreated.     

Treatment of climacteric symptoms in breast cancer patients: A retrospective study from a medication databank

Introduction

Women affected by breast cancer (BC) will often go through menopause at an earlier age and display more frequent and severe symptoms than women who have a natural menopause. The safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and vaginal estrogens for BC survivors has been debated over time and remains unclear. Non hormonal therapies such as antidepressants, gabapentine and clonidine may be useful for those patients but there are few data about their safety.

Aim

This retrospective study analyses the use by BC patients of treatments known to alleviate climacteric symptoms.

Material and method

Post-menopausal Estrogen Receptors positive (ER+) BC patients, aged 45–69, were identified as having bought, at least once, an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen between the years 2000 and 2012 through a pharmaceutical databank in Belgium. Among them, we defined users of a climacteric treatment those who bought, at least once, HRT, vaginal topical estrogens, antidepressants, clonidine and gabapentine.

Results

We identified 2530 BC patients. Among them, 45% were buying a treatment known to alleviate menopausal symptoms. The majority of these treatments were non-HRT therapies. HRT and vaginal estrogens were seldom bought (respectively 1.1% and 6%), but 3% bought vaginal estrogens while buying AI. About 9.2% of tamoxifen users patients bought antidepressants implicated in tamoxifen metabolism at the same time as tamoxifen.

Conclusions

Most BC patients follow current guidelines contra-indicating the use of HRT after BC, they use non hormonal therapies. In some cases they use unfortunately antidepressants that may alter the metabolism of tamoxifen.     

Issues to debate on the Women's Health Initiative: failure of estrogen plus progestin therapy for prevention of breast cancer risk

Several studies on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the USA have been published. They revealed that the risk of breast cancer is increased with HRT more than with estrogen alone (ERT). A progestin has been given with each dose of ERT, as was the case in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study. The results of studies in Europe show similar trends. The increased risk of breast cancer in the WHI study was significantly higher only in women who had used HRT for several years before entering the study. The study was non-blind in 3444 cases, i.e. 40.5% of women in the estrogen plus progestin group and 6.8% in controls. If the women in the HRT group had more mammographic examinations it could change the validity of the results of the study. Estradiol-containing drugs have now been added to the list of carcinogens and the packages of these drugs have warning labels. The results of the WHI study do not support this labelling. The results of the WHI study show that the administration of HRT increases the risks of stroke and pulmonary embolism. It is reasonable to think that in the case of bleeding, at least at weekends in nursing homes (when staff levels may be low) patients were immobilized in their beds. Immobilization among women on HRT could have been more dangerous than the HRT itself. Progestins need to be delivered to the endometrium in a manner that will have the least effect on the breast. Systemic administration can be replaced by releasing progestin locally in the uterine cavity. Endometrial protection with a levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system (IUS) is well tolerated. The high hepatic concentrations of estrogens given orally could be avoided by transdermal administration. New studies should be planned to reflect the situation in clinical practice. The time to start HRT in healthy menopausal women is between the ages of 45 to 55 years.     

Hormone use and patient concerns after the findings of the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE: To assess behaviors and concerns related to hormone therapy after the findings of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). DESIGN: A survey was mailed to a random sample of 1,200 women identified through the pharmacy database as taking one of two estrogen + progestogen therapies (EPT) during the 6-month period before the publication of WHI findings. Questions included hormone use history, changes in usage, an assessment of symptoms, symptom changes, health behavior changes, use of alternative therapies, and demographics. RESULTS: The response rate was 70%, with women in their 60s and those receiving hormone therapy for 5 or more years were more likely to respond (P < 0.05). The majority had started hormones for symptom relief (69%) and expected to continue use. Many reported discontinuation (63%) or modifying their medication (18%). Half of these women stopped then restarted, the other half changed products. Women in their 50s were more likely to remain on hormones than older women (P < 0.01), and those taking ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate were more likely to remain on their medication than those on conjugated estrogens (43% vs 29%, P < 0.01). Little change was reported in exercise and 19% increased their calcium intake. Patient concerns fell into five major categories: long-term effects, symptom control, breast cancer risk, bone health, and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: Women seem to be heeding the warnings about hormones but remain concerned about the potential long-term sequelae and symptom control. More research is needed to identify safer approaches to symptom relief and to address the concerns expressed.     

HRT and gynaecologic cancer after WHI: old stuff or new doubts?

Previous studies had shown that there is little concern about endometrial cancer risk with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), whereas the risk of ovarian cancer is still debated. A new paper based on the women's health initiative (WHI) study devoted to gynaecologic cancers has been published in the October 2003 issue of JAMA, leading to the conclusion that also for endometrial and ovarian cancer risk, as the first WHI publication did for breast cancer risk, the previous large studies have been confirmed. About follow-up the authors conclude that, "The increased burden of endometrial biopsies required to assess vaginal bleeding further limits the acceptability of this regimen." These conclusions deserve a thorough analysis and must be read in the light of the burden of available epidemiological and clinical data and of recommended clinical practice. In the WHI trial the use of continuous combined HRT has resulted in a considerable increase of both imaging and invasive exams, to investigate women with bleeding or spotting, but the findings of these exams have been invariably negative. As far as, all published studies agree on the fact that continuous combined HRT either has no effect or significantly reduces the risk of both endometrial hyperplasia and cancer, there should be no reason to close-watching endometrium of women using this regimen with a different strategy from that employed on any healthy woman.     

Breast cancer risk in the WHI study: the problem of obesity

In the climacteric, about 40% of the women have occult breast tumors the growth of which may be stimulated by hormones. Many genetic, reproductive and lifestyle factors may influence the incidence of breast cancer. Epidemiological data suggest that the increase in the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer induced by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is comparable with that associated with early menarche, late menopause, late first birth, alcohol consumption, etc. One of the most important risk factors is obesity which exceeds the effect of HRT by far, and in overweight postmenopausal women the elevated risk of breast cancer is not further increased by HRT. As in the WHI study the majority of women was overweight or obese, this trial was unsuitable for the investigation of breast cancer risk. In the women treated with an estrogen/progestin combination, the RR of breast cancer rose only in those women who have been treated with hormones prior to the study, suggesting a selection bias. In the women not pretreated with hormones, it was not elevated. In the estrogen-only arm of the WHI study, there was no increase but a steady decrease in the RR of breast cancer during 6.8 years of estrogen therapy. This result was unexpected, as estrogens are known to facilitate the development and growth of breast tumors, and the effect is enhanced by the addition of progestins. Obese women are at high risk to develop a metabolic syndrome including insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. In postmenopausal women, elevated insulin levels are not only associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, but also for breast cancer. This might explain the effects observed in both arms of the WHI study: HRT with relative low doses of estrogens may improve insulin resistance and, hence, reduce the elevated breast cancer risk in obese patients, whereas this beneficial estrogen effect may be antagonized by progestins. The principal options for the reduction of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women are the prevention of overweight and obesity to avoid the development of hyperinsulinemia, the medical treatment of insulin resistance, the use of low doses of estrogens and the reduction of exposure to progestins. The latter might include long-cycles with the sequential use of appropriate progestins every 3 months for 14 days. There are large inter-individual variations in the proliferative response to estrogens of the endometrium. Control by vaginalsonography and progestin challenge tests may help to identify those women who may be candidates for low-dose estrogen-only therapy.     

Changing use of hormone therapy among minority women since the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE: There has been a significant shift in the use of hormone therapy (HT) among nonminority women since the publication of results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Little is known about how the WHI results affected minority populations. This survey measured patterns of HT use among inner city women after publication of the WHI results, identified factors involved in the decision to continue or discontinue HT, and characterized the symptom burden and the experience of women who attempted to discontinue HT. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 101 English- and Spanish-speaking women in an inner city general internal medicine clinic from August 2003 to April 2004. All women had been taking HT at the time of the publication of the WHI results. The survey included questions on patient-reported experience with HT, symptoms of menopause, and use of alternative treatments. RESULTS: Overall, 101 of 142 (71%) eligible women agreed to participate. The mean age of participants was 60 years; 43% were African American and 46% were Hispanic. The mean duration of HT use was 9.6 years. Three quarters (74%) had heard about the WHI findings, and 87% had attempted to stop taking HT after their publication. The most common reason for attempting to stop HT was concern about an increased risk of cancer or a general increase in risk to health. Of those who stopped HT, the vast majority (85%) reported vasomotor symptoms, and 26% restarted HT, mostly to treat those symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all minority women in this small sample attempted to stop HT use after the results of the WHI were published. Restarting HT for treatment of symptoms was common.     

Recent reversal of trends in hormone therapy use in a European population

OBJECTIVE: The impact of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial results published in July 2002 indicating that hormone therapy (HT) is potentially harmful for the heart and the mammary gland of naturally postmenopausal women was assessed for the first time in a European population. DESIGN: This study continuously monitored HT use from 1994 through 2003 in a population-based random sample of 5,758 women aged 35 to 74 years residing in Geneva (city and canton), Switzerland, yielding 1,938 naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus and 206 artificially postmenopausal women. Women in the former subgroup weighed substantially less than their WHI trial counterparts but were not otherwise at lower risk for cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Among the naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus, current HT use increased from 29% to 46% (P < 0.0001) through July 2002 and then decreased abruptly to 31% in 2003. Current HT use remained stable (range, 38%-46%; trend P = 0.92) among the artificially postmenopausal women. CONCLUSIONS: Successive annual increases from 1994 through 2001 in the prevalence of current HT use by postmenopausal women living in Geneva were dramatically reversed to the level in 1994 just after the results of the WHI trial were published, but only for naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. Approximately one in three of the latter women who stopped using HT may also have lost its beneficial effects on bone health.