Living-related liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for a patient with large spontaneous splenorenal collateral

BACKGROUND: A large splenorenal collateral must be interrupted during liver transplantation to secure adequate portal perfusion. However, this process increases the complexity of the operative procedure and may cause hazardous bleeding. Recently, renoportal anastomosis in portal reconstruction was reported in cadaveric liver transplantation for patients with surgically created splenorenal shunts. We used this technique in a living-related liver transplantation. METHODS: A 29-year-old female with a large spontaneous splenorenal collateral and a portal venous thrombus underwent a living-related liver transplantation. At surgery, the left renal vein was divided and the distal stump was anastomosed to the portal vein of the graft without interrupting collaterals. RESULTS: Adequate portal venous blood flow was maintained throughout the postoperative course. The patient was discharged 9 weeks after transplantation and remains well. CONCLUSION: The renoportal anastomosis could be used for portal reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation for patients with a large splenorenal collateral. It provides adequate portal perfusion without interrupting collateral circulation.     

Liver Transplantation in Patients With Complete Portal Vein Thrombosis: Renoportal or Varicoportal Anastomosis Using Cryopreserved Vein Grafts

Background

Despite technical developments in transplantation surgery, complete portal vein thrombosis still remains a challenge for restoration of adequate portal vein inflow. Renoportal or varicoportal anastomosis provides an effective alternative solution for patients with complete portal vein thrombosis. This study describes our experience with renoportal and varicoportal anastomosis during liver transplantation.

Renoportal anastomosis in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: report of a case

End-stage liver disease is often accompanied by thrombosis of the portal vein and the formation of splanchnic collateral vessels. Successful liver transplantation in such situations is more likely if the surgeon uses a strategy to establish a graft inflow. A 59-year-old male with a decompensated liver secondary to idiopathic portal hypertension underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft donated from his son. His portal venous trunk was atrophied and a splenorenal shunt drained the mesenteric venous flow into the systemic circulation. LDLT was performed with renoportal anastomosis (RPA) using his right internal jugular vein as an interposed venous graft, without dissecting the collateral vessels. Although he developed temporary functional hyperbilirubinemia, he was discharged from the hospital 23 days after LDLT. This case suggests that RPA is a useful technique to manage patients with an obstructed portal vein and a splenorenal shunt.     

Renoportal Anastomosis and Its Complications: A Complex Case Report

BackgroundRenoportal anastomosis (RPA) is an effective technique in cases of complex portal vein thrombosis with the presence of a splenorenal shunt. The objective of this report is to describe the possible complications related to RPA.Case ReportA 50-year-old man with alcohol-related and hepatitis C-related cirrhosis and 2 hepatocellular carcinomas underwent liver transplant. He presented a portal vein thrombosis Yerdel IV, a splenorenal shunt, and another shunt between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and the perirectal plexus. During surgery, the flow of the left renal vein was 891 mL/min, and this rose to 1050 mL/min after IMV clamping. RPA was made through iliac vein graft interposition, and the IMV was ligated. Portal flow was 832 mL/min but drastically decreased because of mesenteric root compression. After finishing the liver transplant, a renoiliac graft percutaneous transhepatic stent was put in place. The patient presented graft dysfunction and acute kidney injury. On postoperative day +18, a second stent was put in place because of a thrombosis in the splenomesenteric confluence. The patient subsequently presented partial distal rethrombosis and a pancreaticoduodenal arteriovenous fistula, which required several embolizations. The patient developed ascites, recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, and persistent bacterial peritonitis. Finally, a modified Sugiura procedure (without splenectomy) was performed, achieving a portal flow of 1800 mL/min. However, the patient developed sepsis and multiorgan failure, and died on postoperative day +70.ConclusionsDespite long-term patient and graft survival within accepted limits after LT, RPA is a challenging technique not exempt from complications.     

Living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for patients with large spontaneous splenorenal shunts

BACKGROUND: End-stage liver disease is often accompanied by large spontaneous splenorenal shunts and thrombosed portal vein. Renoportal anastomosis for spontaneous splenorenal shunts in living-donor liver transplantations is one of the solutions for the treatment of these patients. However, the long-term outcome, portal venous hemodynamics after liver transplantation, and the effects of altering the renal venous drainage remained unknown. METHODS: We performed three living-donor liver transplantations with renoportal anastomosis for the treatment of spontaneous splenorenal shunts between 1999 and 2004. We then evaluated the outcome of this procedure using short- and long-term follow-ups in which the postoperative graft function, renal function, radiological images and portal hemodynamics were examined. RESULTS: All three patients who underwent a living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis are alive with normal graft function and a patent renoportal anastomosis. The portal hemodynamics were similar to those in conventional living-donor liver transplantation recipients, and had no harmful effect on allograft function. Left renal function returned to normal after the temporal impairment in two cases, and remained slightly impaired in one, although it was negligible clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for the treatment of spontaneous splenorenal shunts in patients with end-stage liver disease is a life-saving and safe technique and should be discussed as a treatment option for patients with splenorenal shunts.     

Successful Treatment of a Patient With Diffuse Portosplenomesenteric Thrombosis Using a Pericholedochal Varix for Portal Flow Reconstruction During Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Portal vein thrombosis remains a challenging issue in liver transplantation. When thrombectomy is not feasible due to diffuse portosplenomesenteric thrombosis, other modalities are adapted such as the use of a jump graft or portal tributaries or even multivisceral transplantation. For patients with diffuse thrombosis of the splanchnic venous system, a large pericholedochal varix can be a useful vessel for providing splanchnic blood flow to the graft and for relieving portal hypertension. We report our experience of successfully treating a patient with diffuse portosplenomesenteric thrombosis using a pericholedochal varix for portal flow reconstruction during deceased donor liver transplantation and eventually preventing unnecessary multivisceral transplantation. A 56-year-old man diagnosed with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis B underwent deceased donor liver transplantation due to refractory ascites. Preoperative imaging revealed diffuse portosplenomesenteric thrombosis with large amount of ascites. During the operation, dissection of the main portal vein was not possible due to the development of multiple large pericholedochal varices and cavernous change of the main portal vein. After outflow reconstruction, portal inflow was restored by anastomosing the graft portal vein to a large pericholedochal varix. Postoperatively, although abdominal computed tomography scan showed stenosis of portal vein anastomosis site, liver function tests improved, and Doppler sonogram revealed no flow disturbance. During follow-up, the patient repeatedly developed hydrothorax and ascites. In addition, stenosis of the portal vein anastomosis and thrombosis of the portomesenteric system still remained. The patient underwent transhepatic portal vein stent insertion. After portal vein stent insertion, hydrothorax and ascites improved and the extent of thrombosis of the portomesenteric system decreased without anticoagulation therapy. In conclusion, enlarged pericholedochal varix in patients with totally obliterated splanchnic veins can be a source of useful inflow to restore portal flow and decrease the extent of thrombosis, thereby preventing unnecessary multivisceral transplantation.     

Portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation from living donors.

OBJECTIVE: The authors analyze the surgical pattern and the underlying rationale for the use of different types of portal vein reconstruction in 110 pediatric patients who underwent partial liver transplantation from living parental donors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In partial liver transplantation, standard end-to-end portal vein anastomosis is often difficult because of either size mismatch between the graft and the recipient portal vein or impaired vein quality of the recipient. Alternative surgical anastomosis techniques are necessary. METHODS: In 110 patients age 3 months to 17 years, four different types of portal vein reconstruction were performed. The portal vein of the liver graft was anastomosed end to end (type I); to the branch patch of the left and right portal vein of the recipient (type II); to the confluence of the recipient superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein (type III); and to a vein graft interposed between the confluence and the liver graft (type IV). Reconstruction patterns were evaluated by their frequency of use among different age groups of recipients, postoperative portal vein blood flow, and postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: The portal vein of the liver graft was anastomosed by reconstruction type I in 32%, II in 24%, III in 14%, and IV 29% of the cases. In children <1 year of age, type I could be performed in only 17% of the cases, whereas 37% received type IV reconstruction. Postoperative Doppler ultrasound (mL/min/100 g liver) showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower portal blood flow after type II (76.6 +/- 8.4) versus type I (110 +/- 14.3), type III (88 +/- 18), and type IV (105 +/- 19.5). Portal vein thrombosis occurred in two cases after type II and in one case after type IV anastomosis. Portal stenosis was encountered in one case after type I reconstruction. Pathologic changes of the recipient native portal vein were found in 27 of 35 investigated cases. CONCLUSION: In living related partial liver transplantation, portal vein anastomosis to the confluence with or without the use of vein grafts is the optimal alternative to end-to-end reconstruction, especially in small children.     

Eversion Thrombectomy for Portal Vein Thrombosis During Liver Transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been seen as an obstacle to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but recent data suggest that favorable results may be achieved in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, management, and survival of patients with PVT undergoing primary OLT with thrombectomy. Between October 1990 and August 2000, 468 liver transplantations were performed in our center and portal vein thrombosis was present in 38 patients (8.1%). Preoperative diagnosis, extension, intraoperative management, postoperative recurrence of portal vein thrombosis, and 1-year actuarial survival rates were retrospectively studied. Preoperative diagnosis was made in 17 cases (44.7%). In all patients, portal flow was restored after portal vein thrombectomy, followed by usual end-to-end portal anastomosis. All patients received preventive low-weight heparin from day 2 to hospital discharge, and then aspirin. Rethrombosis was observed in one patient with extended splanchnic thrombus. The 1-year actuarial patient survival rate was 83.7%, and did not significantly differ from the patients without portal vein thrombosis (86.7%). Our results suggest that portal vein thrombosis is often partial and thus difficult to diagnose preoperatively: it can be managed successfully during surgery by thrombectomy, except when there is complete splanchnic veins thrombosis; and it did not affect 1-year survival.     

A single-center experience with retrograde reperfusion in liver transplantation

Poor graft function secondary to injury by ischemia and reperfusion remains a major problem with regard to morbidity and mortality in clinical liver transplantation (LTX). Up to one fifth of patients suffer from poor initial liver function due to severe damage to hepatocytes. This situation leads either to primary nonfunction described in approximately 6% of LTX or to slow recovery. We present a new method of reperfusion during LTX. From July 1998 to July 2002, 42 LTX in 39 recipients, (10 female, 52 years old (26–70) were performed. LTX was carried out in piggy-back technique. After completing the piggy-back anastomosis, the caval vein was declamped immediately, and retrograde low pressure reperfusion of the graft with low oxygenated venous blood was established. Portal anastomosis was performed using a running suture. In order to provide optimal retrograde liver perfusion, no clamping of the donor portal vein was done. After completing portal anastomosis, the recipient portal vein was declamped immediately. During arterial anastomosis, the transplanted liver was antegradely perfused via the portal vein. After completing hepatic artery anastomosis, declamping of the hepatic artery was done and arterial perfusion started. No backtable or in-situ-flushing except the described reperfusion technique was performed. Forty-two LTX in 39 recipients using piggy-back technique and retrograde reperfusion via the caval vein followed by antegrade reperfusion via the portal vein were performed; 38 out of 39 patients (97.44%) were alive and well at day 8 after LTX. One patient (2.56%) died of a pre-existing portal vein thrombosis on day 2 after LTX. Three patients had to undergo retransplantation for hepatic artery thrombosis (7.14%). Liver enzymes, bilirubine, prothrombine time and AT III on day 1, 3, 5 and 8 after LTX showed favourable values. Median aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) was 219 U/l on day 1 after LTX. One-month survival rate was 95.23%, and 1-year survival rate 87.88%. Two patients died of liver-associated causes (5.12%). One patient died of a late hepatic artery thrombosis, and one more of rejection. No other severe case of rejection appeared. We can conclude that retrograde reperfusion might be highly sufficient method of removing perfusion fluid from the transplanted liver. Low pressure perfusion with low oxygenated blood might reduce the production of free oxygen radicals. Retrograde reperfusion via the caval vein and antegrade reperfusion via the portal vein seemed to lower postoperative liver enzyme values and to improve initial liver function after LTX.     

Complex vascular reconstruction using donor's vessel grafts in orthotopic liver transplantation

The vascular abnormalities of recipients are associated with reconstructive difficulties with an increased risk of postoperative complications. We performed an orthotopic liver transplantation that required a complex vascular reconstruction using donor vascular grafts. A patient with hepatitis B virus cirrhosis received a liver from a brain-dead donor. Dynamic computed tomography revealed complete obstruction of the portal vein due to thrombosis as well as narrowing of the hepatic arteries. We employed orthotopic liver transplantation using the piggy-back technique with complex reconstruction of the portal vein and the hepatic arteries. For portal vein reconstruction, we used the donor's iliac vein as an interpositional conduit from the recipient's gastric coronary vein to graft the portal vein. The hepatic arteries of the graft were reconstructed at the back-table before anastomosis to the side of superior mesenteric artery using an interpositional conduit of the donor's external iliac artery. All postoperative studies revealed good graft function with an excellent blood flow through all vascular anastomoses during the first year postoperatively.     

Innovative techniques for and results of portal vein reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Portal vein reconstruction is a crucial factor affecting the outcome of a successful living-related liver transplantation. We describe here our experience with portal vein reconstruction in 314 cases of living-related liver transplantation with use of novel surgical modalities to enable the transplant surgeons to deal with any size mismatch between the donor's and recipient's portal veins. METHODS: Portal vein reconstruction was classified into 2 major groups, anastomosis without and with a vein graft. When there was no stenosis of the recipient portal vein and the diameter was the same, the portal trunk was used for anastomosis. When the diameter mismatch was minimal, branch patch anastomosis was feasible. When the recipient portal vein was significantly stenotic and the portal vein of the graft was long enough, we removed the stenotic trunk and constructed an anastomosis between the graft portal vein and the confluence of the recipient portal vein. When the graft portal vein was short, a vein graft was interposed. The vein patch technique was preferable when the diameter of the graft vein was not large enough for the interposition technique. RESULTS: Anastomosis without vein graft included trunk anastomosis (n = 156), branch patch anastomosis (n = 39), and confluence anastomosis (n = 22). Anastomosis with vein graft used the interposition technique (n = 77) and vein patch technique (n = 27). The origin of the grafts was mostly from the maternal left ovarian vein (70%) or the paternal inferior mesenteric vein (27%). Complications related to portal vein reconstruction occurred in 16 (5%) patients: portal vein thrombosis in 8, stenosis in 7, and fatal rupture in 1 patient. The incidence of complications was similar for all techniques except for confluence anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Our innovative techniques should be helpful for overcoming diameter or length mismatches in portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Triple-phase computed tomography and intraoperative flow measurements improve the management of portosystemic shunts during liver transplantation.

Ligation of portosystemic shunts in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation has been recommended to avoid insufficient portal vein (PV) flow. Shunts are not always recognized pretransplantation because intraoperative PV flow assessment is not routinely attempted. As a result of a posttransplantation PV thrombosis in a recipient with a large portosystemic shunt and a PV flow <1 L/minute, we employed triple-phase computed tomography with vascular reconstruction and intraoperative graft flow measurement to determine the need for inflow modification in our next 16 patients with large portosystemic shunts. Subsequently, 6 patients with large portosystemic shunts and PV flows 相似文献   

Outcome of modified portal vein anastomosis for recipients with portal vein thrombosis or stenosis before living donor liver transplantation

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or stenosis (PVS) often requires challenging techniques for reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Materials and Methods

A total of 57 LDLTs were performed between October 1996 and December 2010. There were 16 cases (28%) with PVT/PVS that underwent modified portal vein anastomosis (m-PVa). The m-PVa techniques were classified into 3 groups: patch graft (Type-1), interposition graft (Type-2), and using huge shunt vessels (Type-3). The reconstruction patterns were evaluated with regard to age, graft vessels, PV flow, and complication rate.

Results

The m-PVas were Type-1 in 10 cases, Type-2 in 3 cases, and Type-3 in 3 cases. The vessel graft in Type-1 was the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) in 8 and the jugular vein in 2 cases, whereas the vessel graft in Type-2 was IMV in 2 and the saphenous vein in 1 case; in Type-3, the vessel grafts were renoportal, gonadal-portal, and coronary-portal anastomoses, respectively. The postoperative PV flow was sufficient in all types and slightly higher in Type-3. The postoperative complications occurred in 20% of the patients who underwent Type-1, in 33% who underwent Type-2, and in 0% who underwent Type-3.

Conclusion

The m-PVa was effective to overcome the surgical difficulty during transplantation. Pretransplant planning for the selection of the type of reconstruction is important for recipients with PVT/PVS.     

Recurrent Portal Vein Thrombosis In Liver Transplantation With Renoportal Anastomosis Caused by Spontaneous Reno-Caval Shunts: A Case Report

BackgroundOrthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with cirrhosis complicated by portal hypertension, portosystemic shunts, and chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has long been challenging. Spontaneous spleno-renal shunts (SRS) allow new surgical techniques to restore portal vein patency and hepatopetal flow. Renoportal anastomosis (RPA) has emerged as an accepted method for transplanting these patients, with good long-term patient and graft survival. Orthotopic liver transplantation with RPA is known to be complicated by recurrent PVT, with few details discussed in the literature.Case ReportWe present a case of a 56-year-old woman with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent deceased donor whole graft OLT using RPA with iliac vein conduit. The postoperative course was complicated by occlusive thrombosis in the portal vein and iliac vein conduit. Venography revealed enlarged left gonadal and lumbar vein varices acting as reno-caval shunts with hepatofugal flow. Embolization of the varices re-established durable venous patency that was confirmed on post-transplant day 68 with no other hemodynamic complications.DiscussionThis showcases an interesting mechanism by which recurrent PVT may occur in patients undergoing OLT with RPA. Because durable portal vein patency can be achieved with Interventional Radiology embolization of reno-caval varices, assessing these communications is an important preoperative consideration for planned OLT with RPA.     

Replacement of the vena cava with aortic graft for living donor liver transplantation in budd-Chiari syndrome associated with hydatid cyst surgery: a case report

A 12-year-old girl, operated because of a hydatid cyst of the liver, with Budd-Chiari syndrome was evaluated for postoperative development of ascites and paraumbilical varicose veins. A vena caval stent was placed for the relief of inferior vena caval obstruction. The patient was admitted because of progressive deterioration in ascites and liver functions. Imaging techniques showed degeneration adjacent to the right hepatic vein in liver segments 7 to 8, a partially calcified 5-cm hydatid cyst, and a thrombosis in the inferior vena cava was that addressed with a 10-cm metal stent. A living donor segments 2 to 3 liver transplantation was obtained from the patient's mother. After completion of the donor operation without complications, the vena caval stent was removed following the recipient hepatectomy. Suprarenal flow continued after resection of the fibrotic vena cava and placement of a cadaveric cryopreserved aortic graft for the vena cava, anastomosed between the suprarenal and subdiaphragmatic segments of the vena cava. An end-to-side anastomosis was performed between the left hepatic vein of the donor liver and the aortic graft. There was no complication and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 19. Follow-up Doppler ultrasonography showed the aortic vena caval graft to be open, along with the hepatic/portal vein and hepatic artery. This case demonstrated that operations for liver hydatid cyst surgeries can iatrogenically induce Budd-Chiari syndrome; a cryopreserved aortic graft can be an alternative to ensure the continuity of the vena cava in living donor liver transplantation.     

Auxiliary liver transplantation with arterialization of the portal vein for acute hepatic failure

Six adult patients suffering from acute hepatic failure and with a high urgent status underwent heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation. In four of these patients, the portal vein of the liver graft was arterialized in order to leave the native liver and the liver hilum untouched and to be able to place the liver graft wherever space was available in the abdomen. The arterial blood flow via the portal vein was tapered by the width of the anastomosis. Two patients died, one of sepsis on postoperative day 17 (POD), the other after 3 months due to a severe CMV pneumonia. There were no technically related deaths. The native liver showed early regeneration in all cases. In one patient, the auxiliary graft was removed 6 weeks after transplantation. Four weeks later, he had to undergo orthotopic retransplantation due to a recurrent fulminant failure of the recovered native liver. This patient is alive more than 1 year after the operation. We conclude that heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization is a suitable approach to bridging the recovery of the acute failing native liver. Received: 15 September 1997 Received after revision: 4 February 1998 Accepted: 2 March 1998     

Intraoperative flow measurement of native liver and allograft during orthotopic liver transplantation in children

Hepatic hemodynamic changes during liver transplantation (OLT) in children have not yet been studied. We measured intraoperative portal vein flow (PVF) and hepatic arterial flow (HAF) (mL/min) in 53 children and 58 grafts during OLT. Flows were measured in the native organ and in the allograft. In the native liver, PVF and HAF are similar; after transplantation they return to the physiological situation. No flow differences were seen between whole and partial grafts. Among the 8 (14%) portal vein thromboses, PVF was lower in both the native liver and the graft than in the no thrombosis group (P < .05). PVF <5 mL/min/kg was a risk factor to develop PV thrombosis. No graft loss occurred in 3 cases without PVF at the time of OLTs despite the observation that repermeabilization was not possible. In 4 patients with PVF <5 mL/min/kg, after tying a spontaneous spleno-renal shunt (n = 3) or performing a porto-renal vein anastomosis (n = 1), PVF reached >20 mL/min/kg, avoiding thrombosis. In conclusion, PVF and HAF measurements during pediatric OLT may predict patients at high risk for development of PV thrombosis.     

Living donor liver transplantation for the patients with portal vein thrombosis: use of an interpositional venous graft passed posteriorly to the pancreatic parenchyma without using jump graft

Background

It is difficult to reconstruct the portal vein (PV) using a long interpositional venous graft in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which involves the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein (SV). We successfully performed LDLT for three patients with PVT using an interpositional vascular conduit passing posterior to the pancreas without a jump graft.

Methods

Three of 130 patients who underwent LDLT in our hospital between March 2002 and June 2011 required this technique. After indentifying the location of the SMV, SV and gastrocolic trunk, we ligated and cut the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein and other short branches from the PV. The PV was drawn inferiorly to the pancreas and transected at the confluence of SMV and SV. The external iliac vein or internal jugular vein was sacrificed as a graft for anastomosis to the cut end of the SMV using 6-0 polypropylene running sutures. Then the venous graft was drawn superiorly to the pancreas by passing it posterior to the pancreas parenchyma for anastomosis to the liver graft PV. The interpositional vein was placed posterior to the pancreas where the PV used to be.

Results

All three patients displayed favorable postoperative courses with the Doppler ultrasound demonstrating good portal flow perioperatively. The postoperative portogram demonstrated patency of the vascular graft.

Conclusion

This method is easy and helpful to treat portal vein thrombosis, by providing the shortest route between the PV of the donor and the SMV of the recipient.     

活体供肝者术后门静脉血栓形成的诊治二例

目的 总结活体供肝者术后门静脉血栓形成的诊治体会.方法 2名活体供肝者,术前螺旋CT评估门静脉分型为B型门静脉和A型门静脉,经估算,残肝体积分别为全肝体积的33%和36%,均切取带肝中静脉的右半肝.术后早期丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和总胆红素升高,腹腔引流液较多,呈腹水样,超声波检查提示门静脉血栓形成,并经增强螺旋CT明确诊断.供者1急诊行探查术,阻断门静脉血流,拆除闭合残端缝线,将门静脉切断,切除狭窄处门静脉壁,开放门静脉主干,取出多块新鲜血栓,用肝素盐水冲洗至血流通畅后,再将其端端吻合,恢复血流.供者2给予抗凝和溶栓治疗.结果 供者1在手术探查后再次发生门静脉血栓形成,经抗凝和溶栓治疗后血栓消失,痊愈出院.供者2经保守治疗后血栓消失,痊愈出院.结论 门静脉血栓形成可依据超声波及CT等影像学检查结果作出诊断,可采取手术取栓或抗凝、溶栓治疗.