Influence of coexisting cirrhosis on outcomes after partial hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilling the Milan criteria: an analysis of 293 patients

BACKGROUND: For patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) satisfying the Milan criteria (single tumor < or =5 cm or 2 or 3 tumors < or =3 cm), orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is an effective treatment. Nevertheless, it remains controversial whether OLT is the best treatment strategy for patients with resectable HCC. METHODS: This study included 293 HCC patients (both with and without cirrhosis) oncologically satisfying the Milan criteria who underwent primary and curative liver resection between 1990 and 2003. RESULTS: There were 127 noncirrhotic, 129 Child-Pugh A cirrhotic, and 37 Child-Pugh B cirrhotic patients. Five-year survival rates in each population were 81%, 54%, and 28%, respectively. Coexisting cirrhosis, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein value, tumor burden, and vascular invasion by the tumor were identified as significant prognostic factors. Among these factors, coexisting cirrhosis was the most crucial variable by multivariate analysis. During the initial 3 postoperative years, yearly tumor recurrence rate was 22% in cirrhotic patients and 15% in noncirrhotic patients. In cirrhotic patients, the recurrence rate did not decrease even after three years of tumor-free survival post-resection, whereas in noncirrhotic patients the recurrence rate decreased to 9%. Cirrhosis was associated with a higher probability of recurrence exceeding the Milan criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection offers an acceptable survival result for HCC patients fulfilling the Milan criteria. Coexisting cirrhosis is associated with higher mortality and recurrence rate, possibly due to multicentric carcinogenesis which limits the efficacy of hepatic resection.     

Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria. Results of Liver Resection, Salvage Transplantation, and Primary Liver Transplantation

Background There is no clear consensus regarding the best treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Patients with cirrhosis and HCC beyond Milan who had undergone liver resection (LR) or primary orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between November 1995 and December 2005 were included in this study. Pathological tumor staging was based on the American Liver Tumor Study Group modified Tumor-Node-Metastasis classification. Results A total of 23 HCC patients were primarily treated by means of LR, 5 of whom eventually underwent salvage OLT. An additional 32 patients underwent primary OLT. The overall actuarial survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 35% after LR, and 69% and 60%, respectively, after primary OLT. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was significantly higher after OLT (65%) than after LR (26%). Of the patients who underwent LR, 11 (48%) experienced HCC recurrence only in the liver; 6 of these 11 presented with advanced HCC recurrence, poor medical status, or short disease-free intervals and were not considered for transplantation. Salvage OLT was performed in 5 patients with early stage recurrence (45% of patients with hepatic recurrence after LR and 22% of all patients who underwent LR). At a median of 18 months after salvage OLT, all 5 patients are alive, 4 are free of disease, and 1 developed HCC recurrence 16 months after salvage OLT. Conclusion For patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria, multimodality treatment—including LR, salvage OLT, and primary OLT—results in long-term survival in half of the patients. When indicated, LR can optimize the use of scarce donor organs by leaving OLT as a reserve option for early stage HCC recurrence.     

肝癌肝移植的标准及其与预后的关系

目的 评价肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的价值以及受者选择对病人术后存活的影响.方法 对我院2000年6月至2007年2月实施的63例原发性肝细胞癌肝移植临床资料进行回顾性分析.采用kaplan-meier法进行生存率统计分析.结果 63例原发性肝细胞癌病人肝移植术后1、3、5年累积生存率分别为77.4%、59.3%、48.9%.符合Milan标准、符合UCSF标准和不符合UCSF标准受者,肝移植术后1、3、5年累积生存率分别为93.8%、92.1%、29.2%;80.8%、79.2%、8.3%;80.8%、79.2%、0.符合Milan标准、符合UCSF标准和不符合UCSF标准受者,术后1、2、3年肿瘤累积复发率分别为6.2%、15.5%、19.2%;7.9%、15.9%、20.8%;70.8%、87.5%、91.7%(P＜0.01).但是,符合UCSF标准与符合Milan标准受者移植术后累积生存率和肝癌累积复发率相似(P＞0.05).结论 以UCSF标准筛选肝癌病人进行肝移植不仅扩大了肝癌肝移植的适应证,还可以取得与Milan标准同样的效果.     

Liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma should be expanded: a 22-year experience with 467 patients at UCLA

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the impact of current staging criteria on long term survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: HCC is becoming an increasingly common indication for OLT. Medicare approves OLT only for HCCs meeting the Milan criteria, thus limiting OLT for an expanding pool of potential liver recipients. We analyzed our experience with OLT for HCC to determine if expansion of criteria for OLT for HCC is warranted. METHODS:: All patients undergoing OLT for HCC from 1984 to 2006 were evaluated. Outcomes were compared for patients who met Milan criteria (single tumor < opr =5 cm, maximum of 3 total tumors with none >3 cm), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (single tumor <6.5 cm, maximum of 3 total tumors with none >4.5 cm, and cumulative tumor size <8 cm), or exceeded UCSF criteria. RESULTS: A total of 467 transplants were performed for HCC. At mean follow up of 6.6 +/- 0.9 years, recurrence rate was 21.2%, and overall 1, 3, and 5-year survival was 82%, 65%, and 52%, respectively. Patients meeting Milan criteria had similar 5-year post-transplant survival to patients meeting UCSF criteria by preoperative imaging (79% vs. 64%; P = 0.061) and explant pathology (86% vs. 71%; P = 0.057). Survival for patients with tumors beyond UCSF criteria was significantly lower and was below 50% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor number (P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and poor differentiation (P = 0.002) independently predicted poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: This largest single institution experience with OLT for HCC demonstrates prolonged survival after liver transplantation for tumors beyond Milan criteria but within UCSF criteria, both when classified by preoperative imaging and by explant pathology. Measured expansion of OLT criteria is justified for tumors not exceeding the UCSF criteria.     

Debate: Resection for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The management of patients with cirrhosis and early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting the Milan criteria is controversial. Although liver transplantation for early HCC has been shown to have excellent long term survival rates and low recurrence rates, its application is limited by organ availability. Hepatic resection is an alternative therapy for early HCC. Hepatic resection can be performed safely in patients with early HCC and well-compensated cirrhosis. In addition, the reported 5-year survival rates are in the range of 50%. Resection may also allow a better understanding of tumor biology through pathologic examination of the specimen while also providing a potentially curative therapeutic option. The management of patients with early HCC is complex. Resection should not be viewed as opposing transplantation. Rather, hepatic resection should be seen as complementary to transplantation. The best therapeutic strategies for patients with early HCC and well-compensated cirrhosis should be dependent on the individual clinical situation, not adherence to dogmatic universal adoption of either resection or transplantation.     

肝癌切除术后复发的补救性肝移植

目的 评估肝癌患者肝癌切除术后肝癌复发行补救性肝移植术的临床治疗效果及预后影响因素.方法 回顾性分析本治疗组自2000年4月至2008年6月间实施的88例肝癌切除术后复发行补救性肝移植术病例,分析该组病例手术特征、生存状况、病理因素对预后影响.结果 肝癌切除术后复发行补救性肝移植病例平均年龄为52.4±9.2岁(26....     

Salvage Liver Transplantation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Resection: Feasibility of the Milan Criteria and Operative Risk

Introduction

Although the Milan criteria are widely accepted for liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), they have not been fully evaluated as feasible for salvage liver transplantation (SLT) of recurrent HCC after hepatic resection. The operative difficulties of SLT increase the operative risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the Milan criteria for SLT and its operative complications.

Patients and methods

From March 2005 to November 2007, 46 HCC patients received OLT including 15 SLTs after prior partial hepatectomy (SLT group) and 31 primary OLTs (PLT group).

Results

There was no postsurgical hospital mortality among the SLT group but one case in the PLT group due to pneumonia followed by sepsis. There was no difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups. Overall survival rates of SLT group patients were similar to those of the PLT group (P = .14), especially comparing both groups of patients within the Milan criteria (P = .89). There was no recurrence of HCC among the patients within the Milan criteria.

Conclusions

SLT is a feasible procedure for recurrent HCC meeting the Milan criteria; the operative risk of the SLT is also acceptable.     

Liver transplantation outcomes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicenter study.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a frequent and incurable complication of cirrhosis, continues to rise. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been proposed as a treatment for unresectable, intrahepatic HCC limited in extent to the Milan criteria adopted by the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) in 1998. More recently, somewhat less restrictive University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)10, criteria were proposed. To examine the long-term outcomes of OLT for HCC patients and to assess the UNOS policy of assigning weighted allocation points to patients with HCC, we retrospectively analyzed 144 patients (113 after 1998) with HCC who underwent OLT over an 11-year period at 3 institutions from UNOS Region 1. We compared their outcomes with 525 patients (272 after 1998) who underwent OLT for nonmalignant liver disease. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 80.3% and 46.7%, respectively, for patients with HCC and 81.5% and 70.6%, respectively, for patients without HCC (P = .020). However, there was no difference in survival between HCC and non-HCC patients after implementation of disease-specific allocation for HCC in 1998. A higher proportion of the HCC cohort was older and male and had chronic HCV infection and alcoholic liver disease. In univariate analysis, having alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels of 10 ng/mL or less and meeting clinical and pathologic UCSF criteria were each significant predictors of improved survival (P = .005, P = .02, and P = .03, respectively). AFP greater than 10 ng/mL and exceeding pathologic UCSF criteria were also significant predictors of recurrence (P = .003 and P = .02, respectively). In conclusion, taken together, our data suggest that OLT is an acceptable option for patients with early HCC and that UCSF criteria predict outcome better than Milan or UNOS criteria. Regardless of which criteria are adopted to define eligibility, strict adherence to the criteria is important to achieve acceptable outcomes.     

Oncological Outcomes of Hepatic Resection vs Transplantation for Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundScarce data are available comparing outcomes of hepatic resection vs orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients both meeting and exceeding the Milan criteria. This study compared the clinical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection vs transplantation localized HCC.MethodBetween January 2005 and February 2017, clinical and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent liver resection (n = 38) vs OLT (n = 28) for localized HCC were compared using a prospectively maintained database.ResultsA total of 66 patients (with a median age of 62) who met the study criteria were analyzed. Comparable postoperative complications (13.2% vs 28.6%, P = .45) and perioperative mortality rates (7.9% vs 10.7%, P = .2) were noted for the resection vs OLT groups. While Child-Pugh Class A patients were more prevalent in the resection group (78.9% vs 7.1%, P = .0001), the rate of patients who met the Milan criteria was higher in the OLT group (89.3% vs 34.25, P = .0001). Recurrence rates were 36.8% in the resection group and 3.6% in the OLT group at the end of the median follow-up period (32 vs 39 months, respectively). The HCC-related mortality rate was significantly higher in the resection group (39.5% vs 10.7%, P = .034).However, a subgroup analysis of patients who met the Milan criteria revealed similar rates of recurrence and HCC-related mortality (15.4% vs 8%, P = .63). Based on logistic regression analysis, number of tumors (P = .034, odds ratio: 2.1) and “resection”-type surgery (P = .008, odds ratio: 20.2) were independently associated with recurrence.ConclusionCompared to liver transplantation, hepatic resection for localized hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with a higher rate of recurrence and disease-related mortality.     

Liver Resection Associated With Mini Porto-Caval Shunt as Salvage Treatment in Patients With Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Tumor progression before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the main cause of dropouts from waiting lists among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Performing a porto-caval shunt (PCS) before parenchymal liver transection has the potential to allow an extended hepatectomy in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, reducing portal hyperflow and therefore the sinusoidal shear-stress on the remnant liver. We report the case of a 59-year-old man affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh score presentation, C-10; Model for End Stage Liver Disease score, 18) and HCC (2 lesions of 2 and 2.8 cm). The patient began the evaluation to join the OLT waiting list, but, in the 3 months required to complete the evaluation, he developed tumor progression: 3 HCC lesions, the largest 1 with a diameter of about 4.4 cm. These findings excluded transplantation criteria and the patient was referred to our center. After appropriate preoperative studies, the patient underwent a major liver resection (trisegmentectomy) after side-to-side PCS by interposition of an iliac vein graft from a cadaveric donor. The patient overcame the worsened severity of cirrhosis. After 6 months of follow-up, he developed 2 other HCC nodules. He was then included on the waiting list at our center, undergoing OLT from a cadaveric donor at 8 months after salvage treatment. At 36 months after OLT, he is alive and free from HCC recurrence. Associating a partial side-to-side PCS with hepatic resection may represent a potential salvage therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and HCC progression beyond listing criteria for OLT.     

Resection or transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: outcomes based on indicated treatment strategy

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection has been the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the resection rate remains low in cirrhotic patients and recurrence is common. Unfavorable results compared with benign disease and the shortage of organ donors have led to a restricted indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for HCC. STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of our surgical approach to HCC in patients with cirrhosis. The first treatment strategy indicated in these patients was OLT. From January 1990 to May 1999, 85 patients underwent OLT and the remaining 35 had surgical resection. RESULTS: One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 84%, 74%, and 60% versus 83%, 57%, and 51%, respectively, in the OLT and resection groups (p = 0.34). Hepatic tumor recurrence was much less frequent in the OLT group than in the resection group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 83%, 72%, and 60% versus 70%, 44%, and 31%, respectively (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, macroscopic vascular invasion was the only factor independently associated with death or recurrence after OLT (p = 0.006). After partial liver resection, the tumors significantly associated with mortality and recurrence in the multivariate analysis were solitary or multiple tumors greater than 2cm with microscopic vascular invasion (pathologic pT3) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that in cirrhotic patients, OLT may provide better outcomes than liver resection in carefully selected HCC and that longterm survival is similar to the results of OLT in cirrhotic patients without tumors.     

挽救性肝移植治疗肝癌切除术后肿瘤复发

目的 分析挽救性肝移植治疗肝癌切除术后肿瘤复发患者的疗效.方法 2004年1月至2008年12月,单中心376例肝癌患者接受了肝移植,其中36例(9.6 %)为行根治性肿瘤切除术后因肿瘤肝内复发而接受挽救性肝移植者(挽救性肝移植组).挽救性肝移植组中男性29例,女性7例;16例接受右半肝切除,10例接受左半肝切除,其余10例接受不规则肝切除或肝段切除.首次肝切除至行挽救性肝移植的时间为(34.9±16.2)个月(1～63个月).以同期符合米兰标准并接受首次肝移植的147例作为对照组,比较两组受者的术中情况及术后生存情况、肿瘤复发情况等.结果 挽救性移植组术中出血量和输血量明显多于对照组(P＜0.05),手术时间也长于对照组(P＜0.05).随访期间,挽救性肝移植组死亡11例,其中围手术期死亡1例;对照组共死亡36例,其中围手术期死亡3例.两组手术后并发症、肿瘤复发率、受者存活率以及无瘤存活率的差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 挽救性肝移植虽然较首次肝移植手术难度增加,但不影响患者预后,是根治性肝癌切除术后肿瘤复发患者的有效治疗手段.

Abstract：

Objective To summarize the experience with salvage liver transplantation for patients with recurrent hetaptocellular carcinoma(HCC)after primary liver resection.Methods From 2004 to 2008,376 patients with HCC received liver transplantation in our single center.Among these patients,36 (9.6 %)underwent salvage liver transplantation after primary liver curative resection due to intrahepatic recurrence.There were 29 males and 7 females with the mean age of 46 years old.Sixteen received right lobectomy,10 received left lobectomy and the others received sectionectomy or segmentectomy.As a control group for comparison,we used clinical data of the 147 patients who underwent primary OLT for HCC within Milan Criteria.Results The mean interval between initial liver resection and salvage transplantation was 34.9±16.2 months(1-63 months).Intraoperative bleeding volume,transfusion volume and operative time in the salvage group were significantly different from those in control group (P<0.05).There were no significant difference in post-operative complications,tumor recurrence rate,survival rate and tumor-free survival between these two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion In comparison with primary OLT,although salvage liver transplantation would increase the operation difficulties,it still remains a good option for patients with HCC recurrence after curative resection.     

肝移植治疗原发性肝癌103例疗效观察

目的 比较不同受体选择标准肝癌肝移植的远期疗效,分析肝痛肝移植术后肿瘤复发相关因素.方法 总结北京佑安医院2004年4月至2008年3月间的103例肝癌肝移植的临床资料,按照肿瘤的特征将其分为3组:符合米兰标准组(A组)、超出米兰标准但满足UCSF标准组(B组)和超出UCSF标准组(C组),比较3组的总体生存率及无瘤生存率,并分析影响远期预后的相关因素.结果 103例肝癌肝移植总体1、2、3年存活率分别为84.0%、70.5%和60.2%.其中A组50例,1、2、3年生存率和无瘤生存率分别为93.4%、83.8%、73.2%和97.3%、93.9%、88.7%;B组17例,1、2、3年生存率和无瘤生存率分别为93.3%、79.4%、66.2%和86.7%、79.4%、66.2%;C组36例,1、2、3年生存率和无瘤牛存率分别为67.0%、45.5%、34.1%和65.8%、50.0%、41.7%.远期生存率A组与B组比较无差异(P=0.631),A组、B组与C组比较具有统计学差异(P值分别为0.001,0.045).结论 米兰标准是肝癌肝移植最佳适应证,超出米兰标准但满足UCSF标准也可获得满意的远期疗效;肿瘤的分期和微血管侵犯是影响远期预后的风险因素.     

Beyond Milan criteria – chances and risks of expanding transplantation criteria for HCC patients with liver cirrhosis

Abstract:  Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is, apart from resection, one important curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver cirrhosis, and especially attractive because it eliminates both the tumor and the underlying liver disease. The application of restrictive inclusion criteria for OLT in HCC patients resulted in favorable long-term recurrence-free survival. These criteria, however, exclude a subgroup of patients which, despite advanced tumor size, demonstrate an acceptable outcome. As a consequence, expansion of the strict Milan criteria has been discussed. However, this will also deteriorate the average outcome of OLT in HCC patients. Considering that we run short of donor organs, more sophisticated prediction models for survival after OLT for HCC patients are needed to identify patients who benefit best from OLT. Neoadjuvant treatment that is frequently applied as a bridging technique for patients on the waiting list for OLT could provide useful information on tumor behavior to better predict the risk of post-OLT tumor recurrence. This might also allow expansion of the Milan criteria to patients with good response to downstaging methods without negatively affecting post-OLT survival. Furthermore, alternative scoring systems have been suggested to identify HCC patients that might still benefit from resection instead of OLT, and molecular tools are being explored to provide predictive information on HCC biology. This review discusses the advantages and risks of extended inclusion criteria for OLT and the currently available data on alternative prediction models and bridging methods in HCC patients.     

Predictive factors of outcome after liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Studies to define the optimal upper limits of tumor size and number as predictors of outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have yielded conflicting results. We analyzed 72 patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent OLT over a 12-year period in a single center. Predictive factors for survival and tumor recurrence, according to the Milan criteria, were also examined. Our cohort included 60 men and 12 women of mean age 54 +/- 8 years and mean follow-up of 40 +/- 39 months. Origin of cirrhosis was postviral in 70% and Child class B or C in two thirds of patients. HCC was multifocal in 61%; about one fifth of patients had micro- or macrovascular involvement or positive nodes upon histologic examination. The cumulative size of the lesions was <3 cm in 17 patients; >3 to < or =5 cm in 28 patients; >5 to < or =8 cm in 14 patients; and >8 cm in 13 patients. According to the number and size of tumor nodules, 49 patients met the Milan criteria. During follow-up 25 patients died, 13 due to tumor recurrence. The 1- and 2-year survivals were 90% and 85% for patients who met the Milan criteria versus 57% and 51% for patients exceeding those limits (P = .006). A cumulative tumor size >8 cm was predictive of survival and tumor recurrence upon multivariate analysis. The adoption of Milan criteria for selection of cirrhotic patients has improved survival and reduced the rate of tumor recurrence. The evaluation of cumulative tumor size might further improve patient selection.     

Tumor biology and pre‐transplant locoregional treatments determine outcomes in patients with T3 hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. This study was conducted to determine the impact of pre‐transplant locoregional therapy (LRT) on HCC and our institution's experience with expansion to United Network of Organ Sharing Region 4 T3 (R4T3) criteria. Two hundred and twenty‐five patients with HCC (176 meeting Milan and 49 meeting R4T3 criteria) underwent liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008. Compared with the Milan criteria, HCCs in R4T3 criteria displayed less favorable biological features such as higher median alpha‐fetoprotein level (21.9 vs. 8.5 ng/mL, p = 0.01), larger tumor size, larger tumor number, and higher incidence of microvascular invasion (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). As a result, patients meeting Milan criteria had better five‐yr survival (79% vs. 69%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward lower HCC recurrence rates (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.05). Pre‐transplant LRT did not affect post‐transplant outcomes in patients meeting Milan criteria but did result in lower three‐yr HCC recurrence (7% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) and better three‐yr survival (p = 0.02) in patients meeting R4T3 criteria. Tumor biology and pre‐transplant LRT are important factors that determine the post‐transplant outcomes in patients with HCC who meet R4T3 criteria.     

Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience From Brazil

Introduction

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment of choice of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for patients with cirrhosis, mainly those with early HCC. Herein we have present the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cirrhotic patients with HCC who underwent OLT from cadaveric donors in our institution.

Methods

From May 2001 to May 2009, we performed 121 OLT including 24 patients (19.8%) with cirrhosis and HCC within the Milan criteria. In 4 cases, HCC was an incidental finding in the explants.

Results

The patients' average age was 55 ± 10 years, including 82% men. Fifty percent of patients were Child class B or C. The average Model for End Stage Liver Disease for Child A, B, and C categories were 11, 15, and 18, respectively. The HCC diagnosis was made by 2 dynamic images in 16 cases; 1 dynamic image plus alphafetoprotein >400 ng/mL in 4; and 4 by histologic confirmation. Twenty patients received a locoregional treatment before OLT: 6 percutaneous ethanol injection, 9 transarterial chemoembolization, 1 transarterial embolization, and 4 a combination of these modalities. The median follow-up after OLT was 19.7 months (range, 1-51). A vascular invasion was observed in the explant of 1 patient, who developed an HCC recurrence and succumbed at 8 months after OLT. Two further patients, without vascular invasion or satellite tumor displayed tumor recurrences at 7 and 3 months after OLT, and death at 2 and 1 month after the diagnosis. The remaining 25 patients have not shown a tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

In the present evaluation, OLT patients with early HCC and no vascular invasion showed satisfactory results and good disease-free survival. Strictly following the Milan criteria for liver transplantation in patients with HCC greatly reduces but does not completely avoid, the chances of tumor recurrence.     

Recurrence rate and transplantability after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who initially met transplantation criteria

To understand the recurrence rate and transplantability after liver resection (LR), which are essential factors to predict the prognosis of initial resection and salvage transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we reviewed the clinical records of 279 consecutive HCC patients who met the Milan criteria and underwent LR between 1990 and 2000. Recurrence-free survival rates after 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years following LR were 84%, 62%, 49%, 29%, and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis using clinical factors such as age, sex, histological differentiation, serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and 7S domain of type IV collagen (7S collagen), platelet counts, indocyanin green retention test after 15 minutes, and type of LR (resection of one or more segments, or less than one segment) revealed 7S collagen to be a independent factor that significantly affects recurrence-free survival. Yearly recurrence rates up to 5 years after resection ranged from 14% to 27%, averaging 20%. Concerning 169 patients who underwent tests for 7S collagen, the average yearly recurrence rate (27%) in patients with 7S collagen levels 8.0 ng/mL or higher was remarkably greater than that in the patients with levels less than 8.0 ng/mL (16%). The transplantability rate at the time of recurrence meeting the Milan criteria was roughly 60%. There were no pre-LR factors that significantly predicted transplantability. This result indicates that patients with lower 7S collagen levels are more eligible for initial LR and then salvage LT rather than primary LT.     

Living donor liver transplantation of the right lobe for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a European center.

Living donor liver transplantation of the right lobe might offer the possibility to extend the eligibility criteria of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis without penalizing patients who are waiting for a graft from a deceased donor. From 1988 to 2005, surgical treatment of HCC was performed in 580 patients (187 transplantation, 393 resection) in a European center. In the transplantation group, 21 patients with HCC in cirrhosis underwent LDLT (11% of all transplantations for HCC; 22% of 96 LDLT). Solitary HCC were accepted irrespective of their diameter unless vascular invasion was detectable. Multiple HCC nodes were considered acceptable up to a diameter of the largest node of 6 cm and a total tumor diameter of 15 cm. The median follow-up period was 26 months (range, 1-65 months). Vascular invasion had occurred in 12 patients (57%). One patient (4.8%) died within 60 days after transplantation from sepsis. Rates of 3-year survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival were 68% and 64%, respectively. Overall 3-year survival rates in patients with HCC in cirrhosis not meeting the Milan criteria (n = 13) or the San Francisco criteria (n = 8) were 62% and 53%, respectively. LDLT is a safe procedure. However, small sample sizes do not yet permit a definitive comparison to be made between the former results obtained after cadaveric donation. So far, the outcome of the patients is in favor of a careful extension of the selection criteria for HCC in cirrhosis.     

Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function: implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the survival results and pattern of recurrence after resection of potentially transplantable small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in patients with preserved liver function, with special reference to the implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Primary resection followed by transplantation for recurrence or deterioration of liver function has been recently suggested as a rational strategy for patients with HCC 5 cm or smaller and preserved liver function. However, there are no published data on transplantability after HCC recurrence or long-term deterioration of liver function after resection of small HCC in Child-Pugh class A patients. Such data are critical in determining the feasibility of salvage transplantation. METHODS: From a prospective database of 473 patients with resection of HCC between 1989 and 1999, 135 patients age 65 years or younger had Child-Pugh class A chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis) and transplantable small HCC (solitary < or =5 cm or two or three tumors < or = 3 cm). Survival results were analyzed and the pattern of recurrence was examined for eligibility for salvage transplantation based on the same criteria as those of primary transplantation for HCC. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 90%, 76%, 70%, and 35%, respectively, and the corresponding disease-free survival rates were 74%, 50%, 36%, and 22%. Cirrhosis and oligonodular tumors were predictive of worse disease-free survival. Patients with concomitant oligonodular tumors and cirrhosis had a 5-year overall survival rate of 48% and a disease-free survival rate of 0%, which were significantly worse compared with other subgroups. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 67 patients had recurrence and 53 (79%) of them were considered eligible for salvage transplantation. Decompensation from Child-Pugh class A to B or C without recurrence occurred in only six patients. CONCLUSIONS: For Child-Pugh class A patients with small HCC, hepatic resection is a reasonable first-line treatment associated with a favorable 5-year overall survival rate. A considerable proportion of patients may survive without recurrence for 5 or even 10 years; among those with recurrence, the majority may be eligible for salvage transplantation. These data suggest that primary resection and salvage transplantation may be a feasible and rational strategy for patients with small HCC and preserved liver function. Primary transplantation may be a preferable option for the subset of patients with oligonodular tumors in cirrhotic liver in view of the poor survival results after resection.