Effect of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin on anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates

Limited data exist on the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on anti-HLA antibodies as determined by solid-phase assays. We reviewed our experience treating sensitized wait-listed kidney transplant recipients with IVIg as a method for desensitization and report our results utilizing Luminex single antigen (LSA) bead assay to quantify antibody reactivity (MFI). Fifteen patients with a cPRA > 40% received 2 g/kg IVIg per month for four months or until transplanted. LSA testing was performed before and after IVIg. Median MFI for anti-class I antibodies fell in 11 (73%) and increased in 4 (27%) patients after IVIg. Similar significant changes in MFI for anti-class II antibodies were observed in 10 patients (66%). Administration of IVIg was associated with a modest decrease in reactivity to both class I and II HLA antigens (median MFI change 493 and 1110, respectively; p < 0.0001) but did not significantly alter mean cPRA (85% before IVIg vs. 80% after IVIg; p = 0.1). Our data suggest a smaller effect of IVIg on HLA antibody reactivity than previously described, leading us to question how best to measure the efficacy of a desensitization protocol in current practice.     

Desensitization in kidney transplantation: review and future perspectives

More than half of the kidney transplant candidates awaiting transplantation are sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Desensitization to HLAs involves treatment with immunomodulating therapies designed to reduce levels of anti‐HLA antibodies in order to make kidney transplantation possible. Over the last two decades, desensitization therapies have been limited to plasmapheresis (PP), immunoadsorption (IA), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), and rituximab. Review of reported experiences with desensitization in kidney transplant candidates revealed that PP or IA alone is inadequate to achieve durable reductions in HLA antibodies. Increasing evidence has accumulated indicating that high‐dose IVIg has limited ability to reduce HLA antibodies, but a few centers have reported success with high‐dose IVIg+rituximab in non‐randomized trials. Overall experience in multiple centers, however, has shown high antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) rates, particularly in patients with the highest degrees of HLA sensitization. Low‐dose IVIg combined with alternate day PP in living donor transplant candidates has been shown to provide enhanced survival over dialysis. However, low‐dose IVIg/PP regimens also continue to be associated with unacceptable AMR rates. Recent experiences with plasma cell‐targeted therapies based on the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib are relatively small but may represent an important alternative to non‐deletional strategies with IVIg.     

A prospective,iterative, adaptive trial of carfilzomib‐based desensitization

Proteasome inhibitor–based strategies hold promise in transplant but have yielded varying results. Carfilzomib, a second‐generation proteasome inhibitor, may possess advantages over bortezomib, the first‐generation proteasome inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of carfilzomib in highly HLA‐sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Renal transplant candidates received escalating doses of carfilzomib followed by plasmapheresis (group A) or an identical regimen with additional plasmapheresis once weekly before carfilzomib dosing. Thirteen participants received carfilzomib, which was well tolerated with most adverse events classified as low grade. The safety profile was similar to bortezomib desensitization; however, neurotoxicity was not observed with carfilzomib. Toxicity resulted in permanent dose reduction in 1 participant but caused no withdrawals or deaths. HLA antibodies were substantially reduced with carfilzomib alone, and median maximal immunodominant antibody reduction was 72.8% (69.8% for group A, P = .031, 80.1% for group B, P = .938). After depletion, rebound occurred rapidly and antibody levels returned to baseline between days 81 and 141. Bone marrow studies revealed that approximately 69.2% of plasma cells were depleted after carfilzomib monotherapy. Carfilzomib monotherapy–based desensitization provides an acceptable safety and toxicity profile while leading to significant bone marrow plasma cell depletion and anti‐HLA antibody reduction.     

Estimating alloantibody levels in highly sensitized renal allograft candidates: Using serial dilutions to demonstrate a treatment effect in clinical trials

Small reductions in calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) are associated with increased kidney transplantation in 100% cPRA patients. However, the high level of antibody in these patients is such that desensitization may reduce antibody but not cPRA, thus the cPRA change on undiluted serum with desensitization is an insensitive measure of effectiveness. We evaluated cPRA reduction, calculated per antibody titer, as a desensitization trial endpoint. To accomplish this, two serum samples from 20 kidney transplant candidates with cPRA ≥99.9% (100%) were obtained and serially diluted in triplicate to determine the titer of individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities. CPRA was computed per dilution to identify the titer at which cPRA drops below 98%. Inter- and intra-assay variability and changes overtime were determined. The dilution needed to reach a cPRA <98% was within 1 titer for replicates from the same sample, with 90% (36/40) concordance. This indicates that only changes >2 titers can be deemed clinically meaningful. The median (IQR) titer difference was 0 (0-1) from baseline to follow-up within 12 months. The cPRA per titer also risk-stratified candidates for trial inclusion. In conclusion, determining the cPRA per titer is a reliable approach to simplify complex antibody data and an ideal endpoint for desensitization trials.     

Splenic Irradiation for the Treatment of Severe Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

Patients requiring desensitization prior to renal transplantation are at risk for developing severe antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (PP/IVIg). We have previously reported success at graft salvage, long‐term graft survival and protection against transplant glomerulopathy with the use of eculizumab and splenectomy in addition to PP/IVIg. Splenectomy may be an important component of this combination therapy and is itself associated with a marked reduction in donor‐specific antibody (DSA) production. However, splenectomy represents a major operation, and some patients with severe AMR have comorbid conditions that substantially increase their risk of complications during and after surgery. In an effort to spare recipients the morbidity of a second operation, we used splenic irradiation in lieu of splenectomy in two incompatible live donor kidney transplant recipients with severe AMR in addition to PP/IVIg, rituximab and eculizumab. This novel approach to the treatment of severe AMR was associated with allograft salvage, excellent graft function and no short‐ or medium‐term adverse effects of the radiation therapy. One‐year surveillance biopsies did not show transplant glomerulopathy (tg) on light microscopy, but microcirculation inflammation and tg were present on electron microscopy.     

Bortezomib as the Sole Post‐Renal Transplantation Desensitization Agent Does Not Decrease Donor‐Specific Anti‐HLA Antibodies

Persistence of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA) associated with antibody‐mediated graft injuries following kidney transplantation predicts evolution toward chronic humoral rejection and reduced graft survival. Targeting plasma cells, the main antibody‐producing cells, with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may be a promising desensitization strategy. We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of one cycle of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²× 4 doses), used as the sole desensitization therapy, in four renal transplant recipients experiencing subacute antibody‐mediated rejection with persisting DSA (>2000 [Mean Fluorescence Intensity] MFI). Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 150‐day posttreatment period in any patient. In addition, antivirus (HBV, VZV and HSV) antibody levels remained stable following treatment suggesting a lack of efficacy on long‐lived plasma cells. In conclusion, one cycle of bortezomib alone does not decrease DSA levels in sensitized kidney transplant recipients in the time period studied. These results underscore the need to evaluate this new desensitization agent properly in prospective, randomized and well‐controlled studies.     

The Utility of Splenectomy as Rescue Treatment for Severe Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after desensitization for a positive crossmatch (+XM) live donor renal transplant can be severe and result in sudden onset oliguria and loss of the allograft. Attempts to rescue these kidneys using plasmapheresis (PP) and IVIg may be ineffective due to the magnitude of antibody burden that must be controlled to prevent renal thrombosis or cortical necrosis. We review our experience using splenectomy combined with PP/IVIg as rescue therapy for patients experiencing an acute deterioration in renal function and a rise in donor-specific antibody within the first posttransplant week after desensitization for a +XM. Five patients underwent immediate splenectomy followed by PP/IVIg and had return of allograft function within 48 h of the procedure. Emergent splenectomy followed by PP/IVIg may be an effective treatment for reversing severe AMR.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin significantly reduces exposure of concomitantly administered anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody tesidolumab

Awareness of drug‐drug interactions is critical in organ transplant recipient management. However, biologic agents interfering with monoclonal antibodies is not widely considered. We report the effect of high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the human anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody tesidolumab (LFG316) in end‐stage renal disease patients awaiting kidney transplant. In this single‐center, phase 1, open‐label, parallel‐group study, 8 patients were assigned to receive either single‐dose tesidolumab + IVIg or tesidolumab alone, with 56‐day follow‐up. Within‐group PK parameters were consistent. Mean tesidolumab exposure decreased 34%, clearance increased 63%, and half‐life decreased 41% comparing tesidolumab + IVIg to tesidolumab alone. IVIg influence on tesidolumab elimination was most evident in the first 3 weeks. Complete suppression of both total and alternative complement activities was maintained for 4 weeks in the tesidolumab alone group and for 2 weeks in the tesidolumab + IVIg group. Tesidolumab was well tolerated. IVIg infused before tesidolumab affected tesidolumab PK and PD, resulting in a shortened period of full complement activity inhibition. These findings suggest a clinically relevant impact of IVIg on monoclonal antibody clearance and indirectly hint at an IVIg mechanism of action in treating autoimmune diseases and allosensitization by accelerating pathogenic IgG antibody degradation. Trial registration number: NCT02878616.     

Desensitization strategies enabling successful renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Abstract:  Currently, the number of highly sensitized patients awaiting a renal transplant is increasing on the waiting lists of different organ exchange organizations. Due to the presence of antibodies against a broad variety of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specificities, highly sensitized patients have a markedly reduced chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative organ. It has long been recognized that hyperacute rejection is associated with the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplantation. Meanwhile treatment protocols have been developed to achieve successful transplantation across antibody barriers. Therefore, the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and a positive serological crossmatch are no longer considered as an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation. Mainly, two desensitization protocols have been established in order to overcome a positive crossmatch or to enhance the chance of highly sensitized patients to receive a crossmatch-negative organ: high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or low-dose IVIg in combination with plasmapheresis. Herein, we summarize the characteristics of these two treatment regimes along with other alternative approaches that are currently used for the management of kidney graft recipients with broad alloantibody reactivity against potential kidney donors.     

Quantitation of alloantibody concentration can predict patient sensitivity to intravenous immunoglobulin desensitization

Despite the success of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) desensitization to reduce anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, its high failure rate and expense limit its usefulness. We speculated that quantitation of alloantibody concentration could allow early identification of IVIg resistant patients. Patients were described as nonresponders (n=3) or responders (n=8). Panel reactive antibodies (PRA) were determined using Flowbeads and concentration calculated as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF). PRA was equivalent between nonresponders and responders before (97+/-3% vs. 76+/-20%, P=NS) and after 3 IVIg/plasmapheresis (PP) treatments but lower among responders at end-of-treatment (76+/-20% vs. 44+/-15%, P<0.01). In contrast, pretreatment MESFs were higher (333,640+/-241,352 vs. 38,741+/-5,133, P=0.006) among nonresponders than responders. During treatment, MESFs decreased (P<0.05) in 0 of 3 nonresponders vs. 8 of 8 responders. Final MESFs were higher among nonresponders than responders. We report that quantitation of MESFs allows early identification of IVIg/PP resistant patients. This sensitive and inexpensive technique should allow more effective patient selection and reduce the costs associated with desensitization.     

Pretransplant immunomodulation of highly sensitized small bowel transplant candidates with intravenous immune globulin

Presence of preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies may represent a barrier to isolated intestinal transplantation (IITx). We developed an intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) based desensitization protocol for candidates with high panel-reactive antibodies (PRA). Six patients with a mean PRA of 72+/-22% were included in a four-level (L) protocol with escalating doses of IVIg (L1, L2), addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or plasmapheresis (L3); and anti-CD20 (Rituximab) (L4). Four of six candidates improved their PRAs (from a mean of 66.2% to 25.5%; P=0.01) and were successfully transplanted. At a mean follow-up of 8 months, number and severity of rejection episodes of protocol patients did not differ from patients with low PRA transplanted during the same period. These data support the use of IVIg to desensitize patients waiting for IITx. It increases the applicability of IITx, and reduces the waiting time and mortality on the waiting list with outcomes comparable to nonsensitized recipients.     

Eculizumab Salvage Therapy for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in a Desensitization‐Resistant Intestinal Re‐Transplant Patient

The presence of elevated calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) and anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are high risk factors for acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AAMR) in intestinal transplantation that may lead to graft loss. Eculizumab has been used for the treatment of AAMR in kidney transplantation of sensitized patients that do not respond to other treatment. Here, we report a case where eculizumab was used to treat AAMR in a desensitization‐resistant intestinal re‐transplant patient. A male patient lost his intestinal graft to AAMR 8.14 years after his primary transplant. He received a second intestinal graft that had to be explanted a month later due to refractory AAMR. The patient remained highly sensitized despite multiple treatments. He received a multivisceral graft and presented with severe AAMR on day 3 posttransplantation. The AAMR was successfully treated with eculizumab. The patient presently maintains an elevated cPRA level above 90% but his DSAs have decreased from 18 000 MFI (mean fluorescent intensity) to below the positive cut‐off value of 3000 MFI and remains rejection free with a 2‐year follow‐up since his multivisceral transplant. Eculizumab offers an alternative to treat AAMR in intestinal transplantation in desensitization‐resistant patients.     

Highly successful living donor kidney transplantation after conversion to negative of a previously positive flow-cytometry cross-match by pretransplant plasmapheresis

Between July 2001 and November 2003, 16 patients with a positive flow-cytometry crossmatch to their potential living donor for kidney transplant were treated with desensitization protocol based on plasmapheresis and low-dose IVIg starting 1 week before the scheduled transplant. Twelve patients (75%) converted to negative crossmatch and were successfully transplanted. Immunosuppression consisted of induction with thymoglobulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Plasmapheresis and IVIg were continued on alternate days for the first postoperative week. The 1-year patient and graft survival was 100%. The rate of acute rejection was 41% (16% cellular and 25% humoral). All of the rejection episodes resolved with treatment. Combination of plasmapheresis and IVIg allows successful conversion from positive to negative flow-cytometry crossmatch in 75% of cases; after conversion, kidney transplant can be carried out with a high rate of success.     

Desensitization in heart transplant recipients: Who,when, and how

The number of heart transplant candidates who have pre‐formed antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) is increasing over time. The purpose of this review is to discuss the process of antibody desensitization for heart transplant candidates. Specifically, we review the current status of antibody detection including identification, strength, and potential pathogenicity. We discuss which patients and when should they undergo desensitization therapies during heart transplant evaluation. Specific therapies including mechanical removal of antibodies, intravenous immunoglobulins, and novel immunosuppressive agents targeting antibody production will be discussed. Finally, future research strategies to develop novel desensitization therapies for heart transplant candidates will be reviewed.     

Outcomes of Prolonged Treatment With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Infusions for Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background

Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is one of the main problems after kidney transplantation (KTx). The results of intensive AMR treatment with plasmapheresis (PF) and repeated infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are presented.

Comparison of Combination Plasmapheresis/IVIg/Anti-CD20 Versus High-Dose IVIg in the Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Different strategies appear to improve the success in treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), although no one best method has yet emerged. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the combination of Plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)/anti-CD20-based regimes versus high-dose IVIg alone in the treatment of AMR. Group A (12 patients) was treated with high-dose IVIg between January 2000 and December 2003; group B (12 patients) was treated by Plasmapheresis/IVIg/anti-CD20 between January 2004 and December 2005. Graft survival at 36 months was 91.7% in group B versus 50% in group A (p = 0.02). Donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (DSA) levels detected by Luminex single antigen (Luminex SA) and ELISA, 3 months postrejection are significantly lower in group B than in group A: DSA ELISA class 2 score 6–8 (p = 0.02), DSA mean intensity of fluorescence (MFI) max (p = 0.009) and DSA mean MFI (p = 0.0004). The persistence of elevated DSA levels posttreatment is more frequent in patients with graft loss as compared to those with preserved renal function: score 6–8 on ELISA (p = 0.04); mean MFI (p = 0.00009) and MFImax (p = 0.018). We conclude that: (1) high dose IVIg alone is inferior to Plasmapheresis/IVIg/anti-CD20 as therapy for AMR and (2)DSA postrejection can be quantified using solid phase assays, showing that 3 months after AMR, DSA levels are higher in patients with graft loss.     

The Value of Protocol Biopsies to Identify Patients With De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibody at High Risk for Allograft Loss

De novo donor‐specific antibody (dnDSA) is associated with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and allograft loss, yet the allograft histology associated with dnDSA remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the allograft histology associated with dnDSA in patients with serial surveillance biopsies. We retrospectively studied adult conventional solitary kidney transplant recipients from October 2007 to May 2014. The definition of dnDSA was new donor‐specific antibody (DSA) with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >1000. The incidence of dnDSA was 7.0% (54 of 771) over mean follow‐up of 4.2 ± 1.9 years. Patients with dnDSA had reduced death‐censored allograft survival (87.0% vs. 97.0% no dnDSA, p < 0.01). Moreover, 94% of patients received a biopsy after dnDSA (mean of three biopsies per patient). AMR was present in 25.0% and 52.9% of patients at dnDSA detection and at 1 year, respectively. Patients with both class I and II dnDSA had the highest rate of allograft loss. The higher the sum MFI at dnDSA detection, the higher the incidence of AMR. In conclusion, patients with dnDSA without AMR at time of detection may benefit from a follow‐up biopsy within 1 year because AMR can be missed initially. In addition, the dnDSA class and sum MFI at baseline appear to be prognostic. The higher the sum MFI of dnDSA at baseline, the higher the incidence of AMR.     

Kidney exchange match rates in a large multicenter clearinghouse

Kidney paired donation (KPD) can facilitate living donor transplantation for candidates with an incompatible donor, but requires waiting for a match while experiencing the morbidity of dialysis. The balance between waiting for KPD vs desensitization or deceased donor transplantation relies on the ability to estimate KPD wait times. We studied donor/candidate pairs in the National Kidney Registry (NKR), a large multicenter KPD clearinghouse, between October 2011 and September 2015 using a competing‐risk framework. Among 1894 candidates, 52% were male, median age was 50 years, 66% were white, 59% had blood type O, 42% had panel reactive antibody (PRA)>80, and 50% obtained KPD through NKR. Median times to KPD ranged from 2 months for candidates with ABO‐A and PRA 0, to over a year for candidates with ABO‐O or PRA 98+. Candidates with PRA 80‐97 and 98+ were 23% (95% confidence interval , 6%‐37%) and 83% (78%‐87%) less likely to be matched than PRA 0 candidates. ABO‐O candidates were 67% (61%‐73%) less likely to be matched than ABO‐A candidates. Candidates with ABO‐B or ABO‐O donors were 31% (10%‐56%) and 118% (82%‐162%) more likely to match than those with ABO‐A donors. Providers should counsel candidates about realistic, individualized expectations for KPD, especially in the context of their alternative treatment options.     

Steroid therapy for male infertility associated with antisperm antibodies. Results of a small randomized clinical trial

Ten infertile men with significant titres of antisperm antibodies were entered into a randomized double-blind study to test the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy compared to a placebo. Prednisolone was given orally at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 9 days repeated over 3 cycles (their wives' menstrual cycles). This treatment had no significant effect, when compared to placebo, on fertility, serum antibody levels or semen characteristics. A slight decrease in the titre of seminal antibodies was, however, observed in patients receiving prednisolone. In individuals, there were important fluctuations in antibody levels which were independent of drug administration.     

Failure to remove de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies is influenced by antibody properties and identifies kidney recipients with late antibody‐mediated rejection destined to graft loss – a retrospective study

Current research is focusing on identifying bioclinical parameters for risk stratification of renal allograft loss, largely due to antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively investigated graft outcome predictors in 24 unsensitized pediatric kidney recipients developing HLA de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs), and treated for late AMR with plasmapheresis + low‐dose IVIG + Rituximab or high‐dose IVIG + Rituximab. Renal function and DSA properties were assessed before and longitudinally post treatment. The estimated GFR (eGFR) decline after treatment was dependent on a negative % eGFR variation in the year preceding treatment (P = 0.021) but not on eGFR at treatment (P = 0.74). At a median follow‐up of 36 months from AMR diagnosis, 10 patients lost their graft. Altered eGFR (P < 0.001) and presence of C3d‐binding DSAs (P = 0.005) at treatment, and failure to remove DSAs (P = 0.01) were negatively associated with graft survival in the univariable analysis. Given the relevance of DSA removal for therapeutic success, we analyzed antibody properties dictating resistance to anti‐humoral treatment. In the multivariable analysis, C3d‐binding ability (P < 0.05), but not C1q‐binding, and high mean fluorescence intensity (P < 0.05) were independent factors characterizing DSAs scarcely susceptible to removal. The poor prognosis of late AMR is related to deterioration of graft function prior to treatment and failure to remove C3d binding and/or high‐MFI DSAs.