Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic potential of color-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS), power-Doppler (PD) and B-flow ultrasound in assessing the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in comparison to CT-angiography (MD-CTA). Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for CTA with 41 ICA-stenoses were included in this prospective study. MD-CTA was performed using a 64 row scanner with a CTDIvol of 13.1 mGy/cm. In CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, the degree of stenosis was evaluated by the minimal intrastenotic diameter in comparison to the poststenotic diameter. Two radiologists performed a quantitative evaluation of the stenoses in consensus blinded to the results of ultrasound. These were correlated to CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, intraoperative findings and clinical follow-up. Grading of the stenoses in B-flow ultrasound outperformed the other techniques in terms of accuracy with a correlation coefficient to CTA of 0.88, while PD and CCDS measurements yield coefficients of 0.74 and 0.70. Bland-Altman analysis additionally shows a very little bias of the three US methods between 0.5 and 3.2 %. There is excellent correlation (coefficient 0.88, CI 0.77–0.93) with 64-MD-CTA and B-flow ultrasound in terms of accuracy for intrastenotic and poststenotic diameter. Duplex sonography is useful for screening purposes. Clevert D.–A. and Johnson T. contributed equally to this study.     

Stellenwert der Doppler-sonographischen Verfahren zur Diagnose der Karotisstenosen

Determining degree and morphology of stenoses is important for surgical planning or stent implantation. Vascular ultrasound is usually the first modality to evaluate carotid artery stenosis. Due to rapid development various methods of vascular ultrasound are applied including continuous wave (CW) Doppler, duplex Doppler, colour-coded duplex sonography (CCDS), power Doppler and B-flow technique. For quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis the most frequently used parameters are peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in the internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as ICA to CCA ratios of PSV and EDV. Different results reported in the literature may reflect differences in defining the degree of stenosis and methodological differences in protocol or imaging techniques.Differences in defining the degree of stenosis, advantages and disadvantages of the different Doppler techniques and future developments are discussed in detail.     

Transcranial duplex sonography of middle cerebral artery stenosis: a comparison of colour-coding techniques – frequency- or power-based Doppler and contrast enhancement

Abstract The main limitation of transcranial colour-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) is the inadequate acoustic window, which prevents transtemporal identification of the basal cerebral arteries in up to 30 % of cases, especially in the elderly. TCCD with different colour-coding techniques, including frequency-based colour-flow (CFD) or power (PD) Doppler sonography, used alone or in combination with contrast media, were used in 23 patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis. In 10 patients a contrast medium (400 mg/ml SHU 508 A) was administered because of inadequate colour-coded visualisation with TCCD. The data were compared with angiographic methods. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed 2 low-grade, 11 middle-grade and 10 high-grade stenoses in the M1 segment. With TCCD, we found a 7.7 % higher blood flow velocity (systolic peak velocity) than with transcranial duplex sonography without colour-coding because of visual angle correction and a 20 % higher systolic peak velocity using contrast enhancement. CFD did not differ from PD in identification of low- and middle-grade MCA stenoses, but PD alone revealed two more cases of high-grade stenosis than CFD. The contrast medium increased diagnostic confidence in 8 of 10 cases. Only 2 of 23 MCA stenoses (9 %) could not be shown using TCCD. Received: 27 May 1997 Accepted: 5 January 1998     

High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with integrated parallel acquisition techniques (iPAT), color coded duplex ultrasound (CCDS) and power Doppler ultrasound (PD) in the assessment of high-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA). METHODS: Forty-four patients with 52 known or suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were included in this prospective study. High-resolution MRA scans with a spatial resolution of 0.9 mm x 0.7 mm x 0.9 mm were acquired with an iPAT acceleration factor of 2 on a 1.5T MR system (Sonata Maestro Class, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) with a head, neck and body coil. For the 3D-CE MRA a fast spoiled gradient echo sequence (FLASH) was used. To compensate for the inherent signal loss with parallel imaging, a 1M contrast agent (gadobutrol, Gadovist, Schering, Berlin, Germany) was used. Stenoses were quantified by two readers in consensus in cross-sectional area measurements and graded according to the NASCET criteria. Using color coded duplex ultrasound (CCDS) and power Doppler (PD; Logiq 9, GE), the stenoses were also graded by two readers in consensus according to the NASCET criteria from intra- and post-stenotic diameter measurements. The results of MRA, CCDS and PD were compared to intraoperative findings or to follow-up examinations. RESULTS: High-resolution MRA allowed an excellent grading of vascular stenoses. In 70-90% degrees of stenosis there was an underestimation of the degree of stenosis in MRA as well as in CCDS. However, there was an overestimation of 90% stenoses in both MRA and CCDS. Pseudoocclusions with a lumen of less than one millimeter were occasionally rated as a complete occlusion in MRA. CONCLUSION: A combination of MRA and duplex sonography seems reasonable for the accurate grading of stenoses and determination of distal stenoses downstream. However, the accuracy of duplex ultrasound depends on the examiner's experience.     

Intraoperative and early postoperative colour Doppler sonography after carotid artery reconstruction: follow-up of technical defects

We studied 50 patients with intraoperative colour-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS) after carotid artery reconstruction. Technical defects could be detected in 19 cases (38 %): residual plaques in 9, flaps in 8 and strictures in 2. In 9 cases (18 %) the carotid endarterectomy was revised. One residual plaque and one residual stricture caused thrombosis at the operative site a few hours postoperatively. One of the patients with residual plaques developed a high-grade stenosis within the follow-up period. Of the patients with residual plaques two had a medium-grade stenosis at follow-up. Six flaps decreased in size or disappeared within 1 week after operation. No patient with a flap developed a stenosis within the follow-up period. Our findings seem to indicate that correction of intimal flaps less than 10 mm in size is not necessary.     

Does ultrasound contrast agent improve the diagnostic value of colour and power Doppler sonography in superficial lymph node enlargement?

OBJECTIVE: to analyse whether ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) improves the diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between benign and malignant superficial lymph node enlargement by using colour-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) and power Doppler (PD). METHODS: 32 patients with suspected malignant superficial lymph node enlargement prospectively underwent standardised ultrasound examinations using B-mode sonography and native and contrast-enhanced CCDS and PD immediately before biopsy. Solbiati-Index (longitudinal-transverse diameter ratio) and intranodal flow patterns by using different vascularisation types were assessed. Histological and sonographical findings were correlated. RESULTS: 27 malignant and 5 benign lymph nodes were found. Solbiati-Index was lower in malignant lymph nodes than in benign nodes (mean 1.5 vs. 2.4, P<0.045). More intranodal flow patterns could be detected after UCA (53 vs. 43) but the number of correctly identified malignant nodes decreased after UCA (26 vs. 24) and the number of correctly identified benign nodes remained constant compared with native CCDS and PD. In 31% of the colour-mode studies, PD was considered to visualise more clearly intranodal vascular flow patterns than CCDS. CONCLUSION: despite depicting more intranodal vascular patterns, the use of an ultrasound contrast agent seems not to improve the diagnostic value of CCDS and PD compared with native colour-mode studies in superficial lymph node enlargement.     

Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for detection of distal internal carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gradation of high-grade intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis poses a challenge to noninvasive neurovascular imaging, which seems critical for angioplasty in the ICA segments C1 and C5. We investigated cutoff values of intracranial ICA stenosis for transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and compared this method with the “gold standard,” digital subtraction angiography (DSA).Materials and METHODS: Forty patients (mean age, 58.9 ± 13.8 years) with intracranial ICA lesions were prospectively examined by using TCCS and DSA. Two standard TCCS coronal imaging planes were used to evaluate the intracranial ICA. In addition, a control group of 128 volunteers without cerebrovascular disease (mean age, 48.8 ± 15.9 years) was investigated to establish standard velocity values.RESULTS: DSA confirmed 96 stenoses and 8 occlusions of the intracranial ICA in the study population. In 9% and 7% of cases, stenosis confined to the C1 or C5 segment was >50% and 70%, respectively. Receiver-operating curves demonstrated cutoff values for >70% stenosis in C1 when the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was >200 cm/s (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 71%) or the C1/submandibular ICA index was >3 (specificity, 93%; sensitivity, 86%).CONCLUSIONS: TCCS is a reliable adjunctive method to detect and quantify significant stenosis of the intracranial ICA. The assessment of the C1/ICA index and peak systolic velocities maximizes the diagnostic accuracy of C1 stenosis to >70% when extracranial ICA stenosis coexists. Further studies need to be performed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of MR angiography and TCCS with that of DSA.

Detection of atherosclerotic narrowing of intracranial cerebral arteries is important in stroke management and aids in the identification of patients with high risk for vascular events.^1–3 Ischemic stroke due to atherosclerosis of intracranial large arteries has been reported in approximately 8%–29% of adults in general, with a higher prevalence in African and Asian populations.^4–6 The intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) is the most common location for intracranial stenosis of >50%; such cases compose up to 49% of all intracranial artery stenoses.^1,7 Patients with severe (≥70%) intracranial stenosis have a higher risk of stroke than patients with moderate (50%–69%) intracranial stenosis.⁸ Treatment of significant stenosis relies on antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents as well as on aggressive lipid-lowering therapies.^9,10 Endovascular treatments involving angioplasty for 50%–99% ICA stenosis have also been applied but are considered experimental approaches in need of validation by controlled studies.^11–13Because the course of intracranial ICA is complicated due to its tortuosity and variability, classification of this portion of the vessel may differ between authors,^14–16 in turn complicating interpretation of the data. The “gold standard” used to assess the intracranial ICA remains digital subtraction angiography (DSA). DSA is usually performed only after noninvasive imaging procedures, such as MR angiography (MRA) and, to a lesser degree, conventional transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography, have suggested intracranial stenosis. With TCD sonography, intracranial ICA stenosis is considered when flow velocities exceed normal values and/or exhibit abnormal flow patterns. Unlike cases of extracranial ICA disease, stenosis gradation of the intracranial ICA has not been calculated.^17,18 With MRA, intracranial ICA stenosis in the C5 as well as the C3 and C1 segments is frequently indicated by flow-void artifacts, especially when using time-of-flight sequences, because of the inherent signal-intensity loss of parallel imaging, which can only be compensated in part by the use of MR imaging contrast agents.¹⁹ Due to these MRA artifacts, calculation of ICA stenosis gradation is difficult, and semiquantitative scales, rather than percentages of stenosis, are frequently used to describe the lesion.²⁰Although the criteria for detecting significant (>50%) stenosis of basal cerebral arteries has been defined for transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS),^21–24 little data can be found on grading intracranial ICA stenosis. The aim of this study was to elaborate the TCCS criteria for detection and quantification of significant intracranial ICA stenosis and to correlate them with conventional DSA criteria as the standard of reference.     

Colour Doppler and duplex sonography and angiography of the carotid artery bifurcations

We undertook a prospective double-blind study of 128 carotid artery bifurcations using colour Doppler and duplex sonography and angiography. Sixty-four patients with cerebrovascular events were admitted for angiography. All underwent sonography within 24 h of angiography. Standard duplex sonography and colour Doppler imaging without spectral analysis were performed, on the same device, by two sonographers, using defined morphological and haemodynamic criteria. Digital radiological data on vessel diameter were interpreted independently by two radiologists.The two sonographic methods gave similar grading of stenosis, compared to angiography, with an accuracy ranging from 96% in severe to 83% in minor stenoses. Colour Doppler studies gave better area measurements than standard duplex sonography, except for major stenoses. Discrepancies between ultrasonography and angiography were due mainly, to minor stenoses and large plaques of calcification on the vessel walls, which masked very segmental 70% stenoses in 2 cases. Angiography is limited by its own resolution, does not show uncalcified vessel walls and does not give cross-sectional data. It would therefore be inappropriate for showing small plaques, the full extent of ectasia or for defining the carotid bulb accurately.The advantages of colour methods were in investigating sinuous or deep vessels and hypoechoic plaques. Analysis of the residual lumen of a stenosis and its extent could be determined more rapidly. Haemodynamic quantification of stenoses by standard duplex sonography may be difficult because of limited sample volume and error in estimation of angle, whereas colour Doppler allows semiquantitative estimation of haemodynamics. Standard duplex sonography permits good analysis of vessel wall over a limited distance and quantification of velocity; colour Doppler affords overall demonstration of turbulence, acceleration and backward flow.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional transcranial color-coded sonography of intracranial stenoses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial stenoses are associated with a considerable number of strokes each year. The clinical value of a workstation-based three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction system for transcranial color-coded sonography was evaluated in patients with intracranial stenosis or occlusion. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (13 men, 13 women; mean age, 57 years +/- 12 [SD]) with 36 intracranial stenoses or occlusions, as detected at two-dimensional (2D) color Doppler imaging (CDI) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), underwent Levovist-enhanced power Doppler imaging (PDI), with subsequent 3D reconstruction. A workstation connected to a magnetic sensor capable of spatial localization of the probe was used to reconstruct 3D images of the circle of Willis from serial PDI images. RESULTS: At DSA, seven (19%) stenoses were estimated to less than 50%, 24 (67%) were 50% or more, and five (14%) were occluded. DSA and 3D-PDI estimates of the degree of stenosis agreed in 33 cases (92%), with a weighted kappa value of 0.86. Disagreement occurred with two subtotal basilar artery stenoses and one subtotal middle cerebral artery stenosis, which were evaluated as being complete occlusions at 3D-PDI. Interobserver agreement between two experienced 3D investigators in estimating the percentage of stenosis was high (correlation coefficient,.98). CONCLUSION: 3D-PDI enables the investigator to reconstruct virtually any arbitrary viewing angle. Compared with conventional CDI, 3D-PDI offers easier spatial assessment of intracranial stenoses, and its findings are sufficiently correlated with angiographic findings. Because different investigators can postprocess the same 3D data, improving reproducibility and reducing investigator dependency in transcranial color-coded sonography may be possible.     

Colour doppler flow imaging of the carotid arteries

Summary 53 patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis were examined by colour Doppler flow imaging. These results were compared with real time duplex sonography and continuous wave Doppler sonography. In 48 low degree stenoses (<50%) the B-mode showed 36 smooth and 12 ulcerated plaque surfaces. In 24 high degree stenoses (>50%) 10 plaques were smooth and 14 ulcerated. In the low degree stenoses, which exhibited smooth surfaces in B-mode examination, colour flow Doppler showed nine additional cases with turbulences in the area of the stenotic site. This indicates that plaque ulcerations in low degree stenoses are underestimated. In contrast, in nearly all cases with high degree stenoses marked turbulences could be demonstrated by colour Doppler flow imaging independent of the B-mode showing regular or ulcerated plaque surfaces. Additionally, the duplex ultrasound diagnosed a carotid artery occlusion in 11 cases, but the colour coded Doppler was able to assess a remaining blood flow in two out of these 11 cases. Our results suggest that the colour Doppler flow imaging as a noninvasive technique is an advantage in diagnosing plaque ulcerations and it is more precise in diagnosing carotid occlusions than duplex-sonography is.     

Plaque imaging of the internal carotid artery - correlation of B-flow imaging with histopathology

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The noninvasive identification of plaque types prone to cause symptomatic disease is of great interest to improve the effectiveness of surgical or interventional management. The purpose of the present prospective pilot study was to evaluate the association between the results of imaging-the novel sonography technique B-flow imaging (BFI), B-mode, and color Doppler imaging (CDI)-and histopathologic examination in the characterization of internal carotid artery (ICA) plaques. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were included. BFI, B-mode, and CDI images were used to classify the plaques applying the standardized scores of Beletsky et al and the American Heart Association (AHA), to calculate the gray-scale median (GSM) and to detect potential ulcerations; histopathologic examination results of explanted plaques served as the "gold standard." RESULTS: Based on the classification of Beletsky et al, BFI and histopathologic examination results agreed in 21 (75%, kappa = 0.61, P < .001) patients, and the corresponding results for B-mode were 19 (68%, kappa = 0.52, P < .001) patients, respectively. Corresponding results for the AHA classification revealed inferior agreements for BFI (19 patients/68%, kappa = 0.38, P = .003) and B-mode (17 patients/61%, kappa = 0.25, P = .045). The median GSM for BFI and B-mode correlated significantly (r = 0.95, P < .001). The sensitivity of BFI for the detection of ulcerated plaques was 100% and the specificity was 95.8%; corresponding values for CDI were 100% and 92.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: BFI and the combination of B-mode and CDI exhibit comparable results in the assessment of ICA plaque components and plaque ulceration as well as in the determination of GSM levels.     

Improved diagnosis of vascular dissection by ultrasound B-flow: a comparison with color-coded Doppler and power Doppler sonography

The purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic results of different ultrasound techniques: color-coded Doppler (CCD), power Doppler (PD) and B-flow in the diagnosis of vascular dissection. Findings from 68 patients with arterial dissection proven either by vascular ultrasound (US) or by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were reviewed in retrospect. The study compared results from three different modes of ultrasound, i.e., CCD, PD and B-flow, in dissections of the carotid artery (n=11), of the vertebral artery (n=9), of the abdominal aorta (n=13), of the iliac artery (n=12) and of the femoral artery (n=23). MRA, CTA and DSA were considered as reference standard. The sensitivity of CCD for detecting all dissections was 78%, 84% for the PD and 98% for B-flow. For carotid artery dissection, the sensitivity of CCD, PD and B-flow was 82, 91 and 98%, for the vertebral artery 67, 78 and 98%, for the abdominal aorta 85, 85 and 98%, for the iliac artery 67, 75 and 98%, for the femoral artery 83, 87 and 98%, respectively. Intima flaps, fissures of membranes and residual flow within the true and false lumen were better detected by B-flow than by CCD and PD. The lack of angle dependence of the US probe in B-flow made the examination procedure easier. In the cine mode of B-flow, the pulse synchronic movement of the membrane was more apparent than in any other imaging method. With B-flow, accuracy for the diagnosis of arterial dissection is improved compared to CCD and PD. Flow within the true and false lumen, low-echo thrombi, intramural hematoma and even movements of the dissection membrane are clearly distinguished.     

Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the reference standard for assessing carotid arteries, it is uncomfortable for patients and has a small risk of disabling stroke and death. These problems have fueled the use of spiral CT angiography and MR angiography. We prospectively compared elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography with conventional DSA for detecting carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Eighty carotid arteries (in 40 symptomatic patients) were assessed. Elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiographic data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reconstruction techniques. All patients had been referred for DSA evaluation on the basis of findings at Doppler sonography, which served as a screening method (degree of stenosis > or = 70% or inconclusive results). Degree of carotid stenosis estimated by using the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: Significant correlation with DSA was found for stenosis degree for both elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiography; however, the correlation coefficient was higher for MR than for CT angiography (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.86). Underestimation of stenoses of 70-99% occurred in one case with elliptic centric MR angiography (a 70% stenosis was underestimated as 65%) and in nine cases with spiral CT angiography, in comparison to DSA findings. Overestimation occurred in two cases with MR angiography (stenoses of 65-67% were overestimated as 70-75%). With CT, overestimation occurred in seven cases; a stenosis of 60% in one case was overestimated as 70%. Both techniques confirmed the three cases of carotid occlusion. With elliptic centric MR angiography, carotid stenoses of 70% or greater were detected with high sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 95.2%; likelihood ratio (LR) for a positive test result, 20.4; and ratio of LR(+) to LR(-), -0.3. With spiral CT angiography, sensitivity, specificity, LR(+), and LR(+):LR(-) were 74.3%, 97.6%, 31.2, and 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more accurate than spiral CT angiography to adequately evaluate carotid stenosis. Furthermore, elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be adequate to replace conventional DSA in most patients examined.     

Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.

PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) angiography with the volume-rendering technique (VRT) can be used to accurately quantify carotid arterial stenosis and to identify occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 23 patients who were referred for carotid stenosis evaluation. VRT images and shaded-surface display (SSD) images of 46 carotid arterial bifurcations were compared with findings from digital subtraction angiography (DSA). RESULTS: Agreement on stenosis category between VRT CT angiography and DSA was found in 39 (85%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. VRT CT angiography was 92% (49 of 53) sensitive and 96% (82 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses (> or = 70% stenosis). Agreement on stenosis category between SSD CT angiography and DSA was found in 38 (83%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. SSD CT angiography was 91% (48 of 53) sensitive and 93% (79 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses. Calcified stenoses were correctly graded at VRT CT angiography in 10 of the 10 cases with heavy mural calcified plaques, while eight of the 10 stenoses were accurately quantified at SSD CT angiography. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that VRT CT angiography is as accurate as SSD CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid arterial bifurcations.     

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading

PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA. CONCLUSION: DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.     

Evaluation of carotid stenosis by angiography: potential bias toward overestimated measurements introduced by prior interpretation of Doppler sonograms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries is routinely performed before catheter angiography, and its results may bias the subsequent interpretation of angiograms. We attempt to establish that Doppler sonography may show an exaggerated degree of carotid stenosis, introducing bias to the evaluation of carotid stenosis by subsequent catheter angiography. METHODS: Angiograms of the carotid arteries obtained to evaluate potential carotid stenosis in patients who had undergone Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were retrospectively reviewed (from 1993 to 1998). Readers who were blinded to the previous interpretations of the angiography and Doppler sonography results measured carotid stenosis. The results of Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were not re-evaluated. Based on the original Doppler sonograms, stenoses were categorized as normal/mild (<30%), moderate (30-59%), severe (60-79%), and critical (80-99%). Within these categories, the differences between the original percent stenosis, as determined by angiography, and the blinded measurements were determined. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with angiographically measurable stenoses in 128 vessels were identified. The difference between the blinded readers was 3% (+/-8%), with no category statistically different from the other. The difference between original and remeasured stenoses in carotid arteries in the Doppler categories were as follows: mild stenosis, 2% (+/-9%); moderate stenosis, 6% (+/-15%); severe stenosis, 8% (+/-15%); and critical stenosis, 22% (+/-12%). A significant overestimation occurred in the severe (P < .05) and critical (P < .0001) stenosis categories. One third of patients with stenoses in the severe or critical Doppler category had significant stenoses on the original angiograms that were less than 60%, according to blinded remeasurement. CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries has the potential to bias the subsequent interpretation of catheter angiography. Care must be taken to measure stenosis accurately, using strict criteria to determine the potential benefit of carotid endarterectomy for the individual patient and to ensure that the criteria for Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries are based on accurate catheter angiography measurements.     

Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE: To determine if duplex ultrasonography (US) can help predict the degree of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the ratio of the PSV in the ICA to that in the ipsilateral common carotid artery (VICA/VCCA) were compared with the degree of arteriographically measured stenosis. ICAs were arteriographically subgrouped at 10% incremental levels of stenosis and broader ranges. Mean PSV, VICA/VCCA, and SDs were calculated for each category. Histograms showing the numbers of stenotic ICAs in subgroups and for vessels with stenoses of greater than or equal to or less than 70% narrowing were constructed. The number of vessels correctly subgrouped with typical Doppler US thresholds was calculated. RESULTS: Mean PSV and VICA/VCCA increased with stenosis level (P < .01); SDs were wide. Histograms showed Doppler US values in the central groups across all disease levels. Histograms differentiating at least or less than 70% stenosis showed minimal overlap. PSV and VICA/VCCA helped classify, respectively, 185 and 181 of 204 vessels with stenoses of less than 50%, 15 and 21 of 46 vessels with stenoses of 50%-69%, and 73 and 67 of 84 vessels with stenoses of 70% or greater. When classifying stenoses as 69% or less or 70% or more, PSV and VICA/VCCA were correct in 90.6% and 90.3% of vessels. CONCLUSION: Doppler US is excellent for classifying stenoses as above or below a single degree of severity but does not function well in stenosis subclassification.     

Die interventionelle Behandlung der arteriosklerotischen Karotisstenose

PURPOSE: Angioplasty and stent placement of atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA) are evaluated based on own experiences with the method and reports of other groups and are compared with vascular surgery. METHODS: ICA-stenoses of more than 70% were treated by angioplasty and stent placement mainly using the Wallstent. The patients had follow-up examinations with an angiogram after 6 months and colour-coded duplex ultrasound at regular intervals. RESULTS: In 633 patients 799 ICA stenoses were treated, 70% of them were symptomatic and 30% asymptomatic. In 99% of the patients the stenoses could be removed with a reduction of the degree of stenosis from 82% to 12%. Transient neurological deficits occurred in 5% and permanent deficits in 2.7% of the patients with decreasing incidence over the years. Five-year patency was 91.6%. CONCLUSION: Endoluminal treatment of atherosclerotic ICA stenosis is an efficient procedure which can be applied in patients, in whom carotid surgery is indicated, but also in cases with an increased operative risk or inoperability from technical or medical reasons.     

Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, used alone or in association with duplex Doppler sonography, with a fast acquisition time (8 sec) for evaluating the extracranial carotid arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 48 successive patients with carotid artery stenoses were examined with 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Of the 44 eligible patients, conventional angiography was available in 33 and duplex sonography in 27. We used the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial technique to quantify stenosis on all angiograms, and a 250 cm/sec threshold at duplex sonography to diagnose stenoses greater than 70%. Image quality of 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography was assessed, as well as sensitivity and specificity for each technique alone and in combination with duplex sonography. Conventional angiography was the gold standard. RESULTS: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded good image quality in 90% of cases. When used alone, it yielded a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 85%, respectively, in screening stenoses greater than 70% (70-99%). When combined with duplex Doppler sonography, it provided a 100% sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenoses between 70% and 99% and would have obviated 61% of conventional angiography. In comparison, 3D time-of-flight MR angiography used alone yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94%. In combination with duplex Doppler sonography, its use would have obviated conventional angiography in 74% of cases. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography provided accurate results in the diagnosis of occlusions and ulcers and can visualize distant stenoses. CONCLUSION: Used alone, 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is not accurate enough to replace conventional angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid arteries. In association with duplex Doppler sonography, however, it is accurate and may obviate a significant number of conventional angiographic examinations.     

Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine, for both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, the accuracy of subjective visual impression (SVI) in the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, with objective caliper measurements serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. A total of 142 symptomatic patients (41 women, 101 men; mean age, 70 years; age range, 44-89 years) suspected of having ICA stenosis on the basis of Doppler ultrasonographic findings underwent both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With each modality, three independent neuroradiologists who were blinded to other test results first visually estimated and subsequently objectively measured stenoses. Diagnostic accuracy and percentage misclassification for correct categorization of 70%-99% stenosis were calculated for SVI, with objective measurements serving as the reference standard. Interobserver variability was determined with kappa statistics. RESULTS: After exclusion of arteries that were unsuitable for measurement, 180 vessels remained for analysis with DSA and 159 vessels remained for analysis with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With respect to 70%-99% stenosis, SVI was associated with average misclassification of 8.9% for DSA (8.9%, 7.8%, and 10.0% for readers A, B, and C, respectively) and of 11.7% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography (11.3%, 8.8%, and 15.1% for readers A, B, and C, respectively). Negative predictive values were excellent (92.3%-100%). Interobserver variability was higher for SVI (DSA, kappa = 0.62-0.71; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.57-0.69) than for objective measurements (DSA, kappa = 0.75-0.80; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.66-0.72). CONCLUSION: SVI alone is not recommended for evaluation of ICA stenosis with both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. SVI may be acceptable as an initial screening tool to exclude the presence of 70%-99% stenosis, but caliper measurements are warranted to confirm the presence of such stenosis.