The diagnosis of candida vaginitis in general practice

In a multi-practice study, 29 general practitioners registered 361 women with increased vaginal discharge, malodour, or pruritus, and 229 women without vaginal complants. A wet-smear was examined for Candida by the general practitioner. Culture for Candida was performed in the general practitioner's laboratory, and at a microbiological laboratory. Candida was found by microscopy or culture in 140 (39%) women with vaginal symptoms, compared with 51 (22%) without vaginal complaints (p less than 0.001). In 34 women with symptoms (24%) Candida was found by wet-smear microscopy, in 98 (76%) by microscopy or culture in the general practitioner's laboratory, and in 126 (90%) by microscopy or culture at the microbiological laboratory. No relation was found between the number of Candida isolated and the presence of vaginal symptoms (p greater than 0.05). The sensitivity of microscopy was low compared with previous studies and underlines the need for multi-practice studies in the evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Vagicult is recommended for general practice, but problems exist in the interpretation of a positive culture result.