Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities

Thailand is in the process of developing a national cervical screening program. This study examined p16INK4a staining and HPV prevalence in abnormal cervical samples with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), to evaluate the efficacy of combined HPV and p16INK4a detection to predict CIN II-III. Totals of 125 ASCUS and 87 LSIL cases were re-evaluated by Pap test and cervical cells of ASCUS and LSIL cases were prepared on slides for p16INK4a detection by immunocytochemistry. HPV genotyping of DNA extracts was performed by GP5+/6+ PCR and reverse line blot hybridization. Histopathologic tests were performed to identify cervical lesion. Total of 212 cases were diagnosed to normal (20), ASCUS (112), LSIL (78) and HSIL (2). HPV was detected in ASCUS (49/112, 43.8%), LSIL (60/78, 76.9%) and HSIL (2/2, 100%) cases. The majority of HPV positive samples typed for high-risk HPV. 55.7% (107/192) of abnormal cases (ASCUS, LSIL and HSIL) were positive p16INK4a. For the 111 HPV DNA positive cases, 34 of 49 (69.4%) ASCUS cases and 49 of 60 (81.7%) LSIL cases were p16INK4a positive. 140 biopsies were taken and histological classified: CIN negative (65 cases), CIN I (56 cases) and CIN II-III (19 cases). HPV DNA detection predicted CIN II-III with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 49%, whereas p16INK4a staining showed higher sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (56.2%). The prediction of CIN II-III was significantly better by combination of positive HPV DNA and p16INK4a with 93.8% sensitivity and 59.2% specificity. Detection of HPV DNA combined with p16INK4a in cervical cells can predict CIN II-III and may improve the screening diagnosis of Thai women at risk for CIN II-III or cancer.     

p16INK4a is superior to high‐risk human papillomavirus testing in cervical cytology for the prediction of underlying high‐grade dysplasia

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of this study was to compare the clinical performance of an optimized and rigorously controlled immunocytochemical (ICC) assay for p16^INK4a to high‐risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as diagnostic adjuncts for cytology specimens from colposcopy patients.

METHODS:

The study included 403 cervical cytology specimens collected within 3 months of colposcopy. The colposcopic impression and cervical biopsy diagnosis served as the standards for correlation with cytological, p16^INK4a, and HPV data. p16^INK4a was evaluated using an immunoperoxidase‐based assay that was linear over 4 logs for the detection of HeLa‐spiked positive control cytology specimens, using a threshold for positive test results that was based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. HR‐HPV was detected by multiplex PCR using genotype‐specific primers.

RESULTS:

In all combined diagnostic categories (negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, atypical glandular cells, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), the p16^INK4a ICC and HR‐HPV assays, respectively, had sensitivity of 81.7% and 83.3% (P = .81) and specificity of 78.1% and 50.9% (P < .001) for the detection of underlying ≥grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions on biopsy. Furthermore, the positive predictive value of p16^INK4a ICC was greater than that of HR‐HPV for patients with biopsies ≥CIN‐2 (41.2% and 24.2%, respectively, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This p16^INK4a immunocytochemical assay has superior specificity but similar sensitivity to HR‐HPV testing to predict underlying high‐grade dysplastic lesions in patients who are referred for colposcopy. The determination of the overall performance characteristics of p16^INK4a immunocytochemistry, as an independent test or in combination with HPV testing in low‐risk screening populations, however, will require subsequent large‐scale prospective clinical trials. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Validation of p16INK4a as a marker of oncogenic human papillomavirus infection in cervical biopsies from a population-based cohort in Costa Rica.

Due to the high prevalence of cancer-associated types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the poorly reproducible histologic classification of low-grade lesions, identifying infected women at highest risk for cancer prior to neoplastic progression remains a challenge. We therefore explored the utility of p16INK4a immunostaining as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for cervical neoplasia using paraffin-embedded tissue blocks (punch biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedures) obtained from women referred to colposcopy during the enrollment phase of the Guanacaste Project (1993 to 1994). All blocks from 292 women selected by HPV status (HPV negative, nononcogenic HPV positive, or oncogenic HPV positive) and representing the diagnostic spectrum of the population [normal to precancer: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3] were immunostained for p16INK4a using the p16INK4a research kit based on the monoclonal antibody clone E6H4 (MTM Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany). For CIN3, the sensitivity of diffuse p16INK4a immunostaining was 100% and the specificity was 95%. For CIN2, the sensitivity and specificity for diffuse staining were 81.1% and 95.4%, respectively. Generalized to the 10,000-woman cohort, this translated to positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 13.9% and 100% for CIN3, respectively, and 20.4% and 99.7% for CIN2 or CIN3, respectively. Of women with an initial diagnosis of less than CIN2 for whom follow-up data for up to 5 to 7 years were available, 44% with diffuse staining developed persistent infection (CIN2 or CIN3). Whereas our data support the diagnostic potential for p16INK4a, further prospective studies with detailed follow-up determining the prognostic capacity of this marker are needed.     

高危型HPV负荷量和p16INK4A蛋白监测评估宫颈锥切术治疗CIN

[目的]评价高危型人乳头状瘤病毒HPV负荷量的检测和p16INK4A蛋白的表达在预测宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)宫颈锥切术后残存病变或复发中的意义.[方法]回顾性分析142例2008年10月至2010年12月因CIN行宫颈锥形切除术治疗患者的临床资料.所有患者均于宫颈锥形切除术前6个月以内和术后6～12个月进行HPV负荷量检测,并采用免疫组化方法检测HPV DNA阳性患者宫颈细胞中p16INK4A蛋白表达.[结果]宫颈锥切术前,随着CIN级别的上升,HPV负荷量以及p16INK4A蛋白表达均明显增强(P＜0.05).但在宫颈锥切术后,HPV负荷量和p16INK4A蛋白表达明显降低,宫颈锥切术前和术后两者之间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).[结论] HPV负荷量持续增高和p16INK4A蛋白持续呈强阳性是宫颈锥切术后发生残存病变或复发的高危因素,在监测HPV负荷量的同时检测p16INK4A蛋白的表达,对判断宫颈锥切术后发生残存病变或复发有重要意义.     

Evaluation of a new p16(INK4A) ELISA test and a high-risk HPV DNA test for cervical cancer screening: results from proof-of-concept study

p16(INK4a), a cell cycle regulation protein, accumulates in abnormal epithelial cells infected with high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV). In immunostaining studies, p16(INK4a) has shown potential as a marker of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. To evaluate its potential use in cervical cancer screening, we conducted a feasibility study to compare the performance of a new enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for p16(INK4a) (mtm laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) to that of the Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) test for high-risk HPV DNA for the detection of CIN3. Three hundred and nineteen women were referred from Western Washington Planned Parenthood clinics for colposcopy examination and cervical biopsy because of abnormal Pap test results. Cervical samples were obtained from study participants for p16(INK4a) ELISA, liquid-based cytology and hc2. The order (first and second) for obtaining samples for cervical cytology and p16(INK4a) ELISA changed with every other subject. Concentrations of p16(INK4a) protein were higher when the sample was taken before the cytology. The sensitivity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (concentration > or = 8 units/ml) taken as first sample was 90.0% for CIN3, and the sensitivity of HC2 taken as a second sample was 85%. In the same group, the specificity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (46.9%) was slightly better than hc2 (35.4%) Results from this proof-of-concept study suggest that p16(INK4a) ELISA has a similar sensitivity and slightly better specificity for CIN3 compared to hc2. These findings support proceeding with a larger study with samples from a population of women presenting for routine cytology screening.     

The Association of Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Cervical Pre-Cancer and Cancer and Risk Factors in Senegalese

Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading is subjective and affected by substantial rates of discordance among pathologists. Although recent studies have suggested that p16INK4a may be a useful surrogate biomarker of cervical neoplasia, Ki-67 and human papillomavirus testing have also been shown to be useful in detecting neoplasia. The purpose of this study was to determine the expression of p16INK4a and Ki-67 in cervical neoplasia and its correlations with cofactors. Methods: The study involved 69 patients with and without cervical neoplasia who underwent colposcopic directed biopsy. On each patient, two samples were taken; the first was used for immunohistochemistry and the second for molecular testing, using HPV16and18 genotyping Real-Time PCR Kit. Results: The study revealed the expression level of p16INK4a and Ki-67 in a descending order, from invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), CIN2/3, CIN1 and non-dysplastic lesions. Correlations showed an association between the staining of p16NK4a and Ki-67 with the increase of age (OR: 1.79 (95%IC: 0.49 – 6.55), p = 0.037) and marital status (OR: 0.17 (95%IC: 0.04 – 0.68), p = 0.003). We found that the expressions of p16INK4a and Ki-67 were significantly different between invasive SCC vs non-dysplasia (OR: 44.57 (95%IC: 4.91 – 403.91), p <0.0001). The study showed significant correlation between HPV 16and18 infection with p16 INK4a and Ki-67 expression (OR: 0.13 (95%IC: 0.03 – 0.52), p <0.0001). Strong expression of p16INK4a and Ki-67 were observed in invasive squamous cell carcinoma, moderate staining was found in CIN2/3, weak staining in CIN1 and normal histology. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that p16INK4a and Ki-67 expressions associated strongly with cervical pathology. Therefore, p16/Ki-67 could be considered as a suitable biomarker for cervical cancer screening, particularly in HPV-based screening programs.     

Evaluation of p16INK4a expression in ThinPrep cervical specimens with the CINtec p16INK4a assay: correlation with biopsy follow-up results

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine p16(INK4a) protein expression in ThinPrep (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, Mass) cervical specimens by using the CINtec p16(INK4a) Cytology Kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The ability of this assay to accurately identify underlying high-grade lesions was assessed by using follow-up biopsies and comparing these results with Hybrid Capture 2 (Digene, Gaithersburg, Md) high-risk HPV (hc(2)) results. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-eight residual ThinPrep samples were collected, and histological follow-up data were retrieved for abnormal cytology specimens. After preparation of a Papanicolaou-stained slide, a second slide was processed in preparation for p16(INK4a) immunostaining. High-risk human papillomavirus testing (hc(2)) was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 163 cytologically abnormal samples, 6-month biopsy follow-up data were available for 45% of the specimens. At initial blinded evaluation, 21 of the 26 cases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II/III follow-up were positive for p16(INK4a), yielding an overall diagnostic sensitivity of 81%; 29 of the 47 cases diagnosed as CIN I or less were p16(INK4a) negative, yielding a diagnostic specificity of 62%. In comparison, the hc(2) test results indicated a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% with a diagnostic specificity of 15%. After review of selected cases with CIN II/III follow-up, 25 of 26 slides were deemed to be positive for p16(INK4a), increasing the diagnostic sensitivity to 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The CINtec p16(INK4a) Cytology Kit, in combination with ThinPrep cervical samples, allowed clear evaluation of p16(INK4a) protein overexpression. Diagnostic specificity of the CINtec p16(INK4a) assay was significantly improved relative to hc(2). To increase p16(INK4a) immunostaining in abnormal cells, a modified kit version with improved staining performance has been developed and is currently being evaluated.     

Diagnostic value of p16INK4A,Ki‐67, and human papillomavirus L1 capsid protein immunochemical staining on cell blocks from residual liquid‐based gynecologic cytology specimens

BACKGROUND:

This study was conducted to evaluate the reliability and role of cell block preparations in the diagnosis of neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions of the cervix and to improve the value of cell block preparations in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of cervical lesions through immunostaining of p16INK4A (p16), Ki‐67, and human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 capsid protein (HPV L1).

METHODS:

In total, 138 specimens were diagnosed on liquid‐based cytology (LBC) and cell block preparations, and 63 specimens were subjected subsequently to tissue follow‐up and immunostaining for p16, Ki‐67, and HPV L1 on cell block sections.

RESULTS:

In 42 specimens that were diagnosed as low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on cell blocks, 38 specimens (90.5%) were confirmed by histopathologic reports, and there was slightly better than 81.6% agreement between LBC and tissue follow‐up. Immunointensity and cells that were positive for p16 were enhanced according to increased pathologic grade and differed statistically between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN‐1) and CIN‐2/CIN‐3 as well as SCC. The positive rates of HPV L1 decreased gradually according to the severity of cervical neoplasia, and HPV L1/p16 expression patterns were related to the severity of cervical lesions.

CONCLUSIONS:

The cell block preparation technique was complementary to LBC, and the authors concluded that the application of LBC combined with cell block preparations may improve the diagnostic accuracy of cytology. Immunostaining for p16 and Ki‐67 on cell block preparations can help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of HSIL and SCC. A combined expression pattern of p16 and HPV L1 may serve as a valuable index for predicting prognosis and follow‐up of cervical dysplastic lesions. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Expression of p16(INK4a) in relation to histopathology and viral load of 'high-risk' HPV types in cervical neoplastic lesions

A total of 91 cervical archival biopsy series were analysed for the presence and viral load of 'high-risk' types of human papillomavirus (HR-HPV), and p16(INK4a) expression. The women had various degrees of CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia). HPV 16 was the most prevalent type found, at 47% frequency. The frequency of HPV 16 increased with increasing immunoreactivity to p16(INK4a), from 39% to 44% at cases scored low to medium, to 65% at high reactivity. Thirty (33%) of the samples had negative p16(INK4a) analysis results, but were positive for HR-HPV. There was no significant correlation between viral load and the level of p16(INK4a) expression, while the grade of CIN correlated to such expressions. Thus, p16(INK4a) expression analysis yielded information which is consistent with results from the histopathology and might complement the HPV analysis in a clinical prognostic procedure in order to find women at risk for cervical cancer.     

The study of the combination detection of HPV-DNA and p16INK4a in cervical lesions

The objective of this study is to detect the infection of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the expression of p16(INK4a) in cervical lesions and to investigate the interaction between hrHPV and p16(INK4a) for cervical lesions and its diagnostic efficiency. hrHPV-DNA was detected by the hybrid capture II (HC-II) system. Immunochemical method was used to detect the expression of p16(INK4a), and histopathologic test was performed to identify cervical lesions. χ(2) test and Spearman's rank correlation were used for statistical analysis. Additive effects model was used to analyze the interaction. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated with SPSS 13.0. hrHPV and p16(INK4a) positive rate increased (P < 0.05) with histopathologic diagnosis increasing. The positive rates of hrHPV and p16(INK4a) in negative or chronic inflammation were statistically lower than that in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1, CIN2, CIN3, and squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) (P < 0.05), respectively. There was a positive interaction between hrHPV and p16(INK4a), relative excess risk of interaction (RERI) was 52.49, attributable proportions of interaction (API) were 72.34%, and the synergy index (S) was 3.75. The specificity and AUC of combining hrHPV with p16(INK4a) were statistically higher than hrHPV or p16(INK4a) alone (P < 0.05). hrHPV and p16(INK4a) are useful markers for the early diagnosis of cervical lesions. A positive interaction between hrHPV and p16(INK4a) is seen. The combination of hrHPV and p16(INK4a) has a higher diagnostic accuracy than hrHPV or p16(INK4a) alone in diagnosis of cervical lesions.     

Immunocytochemical colocalization of P16(INK4a) and Ki-67 predicts CIN2/3 and AIS/adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Although previous studies have shown that p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 are sensitive and specific markers for high‐grade lesions (≥CIN2) on cervical biopsies, limited information is available regarding the performance of a dual‐staining approach as a diagnostic adjunct in cervical cytology. We evaluated a dual p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry (ICC) assay to determine its sensitivity and specificity versus that of high‐risk HPV (HR‐HPV) in a US‐based pilot cytology study.

METHODS:

ThinPrep specimens from 122 cervical cytology specimens encompassing 23 negative (NILM), 20 ASC‐US, 22 LSIL, 17 ASCH, 22 HSIL, and 18 AGC cases were processed for multiplexed ICC staining using a CINtec Plus Kit. Dual‐positive assay results were defined based on the detection of 1 or more epithelial cells that were stained for both p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 without regard to cellular morphology. HR‐HPV testing was performed by multiplex PCR with capillary electrophoresis genotyping.

RESULTS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 was frequently detected in HSIL and AGC but was rarely detected in NILM cases. The HR‐HPV assay showed a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 55.8% for the detection of clinically significant cervical squamous or endometrial lesions. In contrast, the colocalization of p16^INK4a plus Ki‐67 maintained a high sensitivity of 81.8% and improved specificity to 81.8% for biopsy‐confirmed CIN2/3, endocervical adenocarcinoma, or endometrial adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry dramatically increased specificity and maintained high‐level sensitivity for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 or glandular lesions compared with PCR‐based testing for HR‐HPV. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

p16INK4a免疫细胞化学检测在筛查宫颈癌中的作用

目的 探讨p16^INK4a免疫细胞化学检测在筛查宫颈癌及其癌前病变中的作用。方法 选择220例宫颈液基细胞学剩余标本,制作液基薄片进行p16^INK4a 免疫细胞化学检测,随访组织活检结果,并与高危人乳头瘤病毒（HR—HPV）DNA检测结果进行对照。结果 p16^INK4a在宫颈细胞学诊断的鳞状细胞癌（SCC）、鳞状上皮内高度病变（HSIL）、鳞状上皮内低度病变（LSIL）、非典型鳞状细胞-小除外上皮内高度病变（ASC—H）和非典型鳞状细胞-不能明确意义（ASC—US）病例的阳性表达率分别为100．0％（7／7）、92．2％（107／116）、24．3％（17／70）、100．0％（14／14）和36．4％（4／11）。150例p16^INK4a阳性者中,111例有组织活检诊断,其中宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）2级及以上病变者97例（87．4％）;70例p16^INK4a阴性者中,18例有组织活检诊断,无一例CIN2及以上病变。p16^INK4a在CIN2及以上病变与在CIN1之间的阳性表达率差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）,而HR-HPV DNA的阳性率在两者之间差异无统计学意义。结论 p16^INK4a在宫颈HSIL及以上病变中高表达,有利于高危病例的筛选。     

Clinical significance of immunocytochemistry for PIK3CA as a carcinogenesis-related marker on liquid-based cytology in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

The catalytic subunit alpha of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PIK3CA) has been expected to play a role as an important oncogene in uterine cervical carcinoma, whose expression in non-invasive lesions has received considerable attention. We investigated the potential of PIK3CA as a carcinogenesis-related marker for early intraepithelial lesion of the uterine cervix in cytology samples. Seventy-four cases with abnormal cytology suggesting the existence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions, whose findings were histologically confirmed, were selected; they consisted of 20 CIN1, 21 CIN2, and 33 CIN3, respectively. In addition, 17 normal cases, whose cervical cytology revealed no abnormality over three occasions, were selected. Liquid-based cytology specimens were applied for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA typing and immunocytochemistry using three different antibodies for p16(INK4a), Ki-67 and PIK3CA, respectively. The fraction of immunopositive cells on the slides was calculated and expressed as mean numbers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were generated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of each immunocytochemistry test. The mean number of immunopositive cells in the CIN3 group was significantly higher than other groups for all three antibodies. Among all groups, PIK3CA showed a superior specificity to distinguish CIN3 from other groups. Comparison of three markers by ROC curves also revealed that PIK3CA provided the best method for distinguishing CIN3. Thus, expression of PIK3CA was observed in liquid-based cytology in CIN lesions, which suggested its diagnostic significance in addition to the use of routine cervical cancer smear and the HPV screening program.     

Methylation Status of P16Ink4a in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancer of Oral Cavity and Oropharynx in Northeastern Thailand

Background: Over-expression of p16INK4a protein is a biomarker for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer. However, absence of p16INK4a protein expression in HPV-associated cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx has been reported. Among a number of possible reasons for this is methylation, which is frequently noted in the promoter region of p16INK4a and is associated with silencing of the gene and disease severity. Methods: We investigated the relationships between p16INK4a protein expression, HPV infection and methylation status of the p16INK4a promoter in cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Fifty-three formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer tissue samples from the oral cavity (49 cases) and oropharynx (4 cases) were studied. P16INK4a protein expression was determined using immunohistochemical staining (IHC). Additional oral tissues lacking squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), and cervical tissues with high-level SILs, were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. High-risk HPV infection was detected using HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization. Methylation status of the p16INK4a promoter was investigated using sodium bisulfite treatment and methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR).Results: HPV infection was found in 40.8% (20/49) and 50.0% (2/4) of oral cavity and oropharynx cancers, respectively. Promoter methylation of p16INK4a occurred in 73.6 % of all cases and differed significantly in frequency between HPV-positive (90.9%, 20/22) and HPV-negative (61.3%, 19/31) samples. Expression of p16INK4a was found in 35.8% (19/53) and commonly detected in samples with p16INK4a unmethylation (79.5%). Interestingly, the silencing of p16INK4a (64.2%, 34/53) was significantly associated with methylation status (91.2%, 31/34), especially in HPV-infected samples in which the p16INK4a promoter was methylated (52.9%, 18/34). Conclusions: This result demonstrated high frequency of p16INK4a promoter methylation status in HPV-associated HNSCC subsets that could influence the silent p16INK4a expression and might promote disease severity.     

p16INK4a immunohistochemistry is a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison study with HPV genotyping

Objective

In cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry has been reported to be a useful diagnostic biomarker. However, limited information is available about the association between the p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry and the outcomes of CIN. Here, we report p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry as an effective biomarker to predict the outcomes of CIN.

Methods

p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry was performed in patients with CIN from January 2000 to August 2009. Among these patients, we have performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records to evaluate the outcome of CIN 1-2 and performed statistical analysis to determine the correlation between p16^INK4a expression and the outcomes. We also performed HPV genotyping and analyzed the relation between the infecting human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype and the outcomes.

Results

A total of 244 patients, including 82 with CIN 1, 60 with CIN 2, and 102 with CIN 3, were examined. The rate of p16^INK4a overexpression increased with increasing CIN grade, 20.7% for CIN 1, 80.0% for CIN 2, and 89.2% for CIN 3, with significant differences between CIN 1 and CIN 2-3 group. In the 131 CIN 1-2 patients, the progression rate was significantly higher for the patients showing p16^INK4a overexpression than for those not showing p16^INK4a overexpression (p=0.005); the regression rate was also found to be significantly lower for the patients showing p16^INK4a overexpression (p=0.003). High-risk HPV genotypes were detected in 73 patients (73.7%). Both progression and regression rates were not significantly different between the high-risk HPV-positive and HPV-negative groups (p=0.401 and p=0.381, respectively).

Conclusion

p16^INK4a overexpression was correlated with the outcome of CIN 1-2, and p16^INK4a is considered to be a superior biomarker for predicting the outcome of CIN 1-2 compared with HPV genotyping.     

p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: A prospective study in China

p16^INK4A is strongly expressed in tissues diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV), but few prospective studies have evaluated p16^INK4A as a marker for the risk of low‐grade CIN (CIN1) progression. We investigated the prevalence of p16^INK4A immunostaining by CIN grade and whether overexpression of p16^INK4A in CIN1 predicts future risk for high‐grade CIN in Chinese women. 6,557 Chinese women aged 30–49 years were screened from 2003 to 2005 using cytology and carcinogenic HPV test. Colposcopy was performed on women with any abnormal result. p16^INK4A Immunostaining was performed on biopsies from all women with CIN1, as well as randomly selected women with normal or CIN grade 2 and worse (CIN2+) biopsies. Women with CIN1 were followed up without treatment. Colposcopy was performed on all untreated women at a 2‐year interval. The prevalence of p16^INK4A staining was 2.7%, 42.7%, 75.5%, 79.6% and 100% among women with normal, CIN1, 2, 3 and cancer biopsies, respectively (p < 0.001). HPV positivity was strongly associated with p16^INK4A staining [odds ratios (OR) = 12.8; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.2–31.6]. p16^INK4A staining of CIN1 biopsies at baseline was associated with an increased risk of finding high‐grade CIN over 2 years of follow‐up (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.52–3.91). The two‐year cumulative incidence of CIN2+ for p16^INK4A positive women was higher at 10.71% than for p16^INK4A negative women at 1.30% (crude RR = 8.25, 95% CI: 1.02–66.62). p16^INK4A overexpression is strongly associated with grade of CIN and risk of progression to high‐grade CIN in women with low‐grade lesions.     

P16INK4a和Ki-67在宫颈癌前病变诊断中的意义

目的研究P16INK4a、Ki-67在宫颈癌前病变中的表达及早期诊断价值。方法宫颈活检标本92例,采用免疫组织化学PV-9000二步法检测宫颈鳞癌28例,CIN 45例（CINⅢ级17例、CINⅡ级7例、CINⅠ级21例）,炎性病变19例。结果在宫颈癌、CIN病变、宫颈炎P16INK4a的阳性表达率分别为100%、44.4%和10.5%,Ki-67的阳性表达率分别为100%、51.11%、21.05%,三组不同病变比较均差异有显著性（P〈0.001）。P16INK4a与Ki-67表达存在正相关（r2=0.893,P〈0.001）。结论 P16INk4a、Ki-67联合检测可以提高宫颈癌的早期诊断率。     

Comparison of the Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HPV in hybrid capture 2 positive media

Objective

To validate the efficacy of Seeplex HPV4A ACE for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 genotypes as compared to the PCR method and the Cervista HPV assays in cervical swab samples.

Methods

Besides liquid-based cytology, additional 97 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV genotyping by HPV4A ACE, Cervista HPV assays, and PCR method. To check the statistical differences, we also conducted the paired proportion test, Cohen''s κ statistic, and a receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV HR showed substantial agreement with PCR for detection of HR HPVs (88.3%, κ=0.767 and 81.7%, κ=0.636, respectively). Seeplex HPV4A ACE also showed substantial agreement with the Cervista HPV 16/18 test (89.5%, κ=0.628). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of Seeplex HPV4A ACE and Cervista HPV HR were 91.4% vs. 84.5% and 73.4%, vs. 72.7%, respectively, when those higher than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormalities. HPV genotyping for HPV 16/18 detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) better than HR HPV tests (66.7% vs. 24.6% by HPV4A ACE, 52.6% vs. 25.9% by Cervista HPV assays in CIN II or more, relatively).

Conclusion

Seeplex HPV4A ACE is an effective method as the PCR and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HR HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and 18.     

The role of cyclins and cyclins inhibitors in the multistep process of HPV-associated cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 are associated with cervical carcinogenesis. This is possibly achieved through an interaction between HPV oncogenic proteins and some cell cycle regulatory genes. However, the exact pathogenetic mechanisms are not well defined yet. METHODS: We investigated 110 subjects (43 invasive squamous cell carcinoma (ISCC), 38 CIN III, 11 CIN II, 18 CIN I) confirmed to be positive for HPV16 and/or 18 as well as 20 normal cervical tissue (NCT) samples for abnormal expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, cyclin inhibitors (p21 (waf), p27, p16 (INK4A)) and Ki-67 using immunohistochemistry and differential PCR techniques. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the expression of Ki-67, cyclin E, CDK4, p16 (INK4A) (p=0.003, 0.001, 0.001) and a significant decrease in p27 (Kip1) from NCT to ISCC (p=0.003). There was a significant correlation between altered expression of p27 (KIP1) and p16(INK4A) (p<0.001), cyclin D1 and CDK4 (p=0.001), cyclin E and p27 (Kip1) (p=0.011) in all studied groups. In ISCC, there was significant relationship between standard clinicopathological prognostic factors and high Ki-67 index , increased cyclin D1 and cyclin E, reduced p27 (Kip1) and p21 (waf). CONCLUSION: 1) Aberrations involving p27 (KIP1), cyclin E, CDK4 and p16 (INK4A) are considered early events in HPV 16 and 18-associated cervical carcinogenesis (CINI & II), whereas cyclin D1 aberrations are late events (CINIII & ISCC) 2) Immunohistochemical tests for p16 (INK4A) and cyclin E could help in early diagnosis of cervical carcinoma 3) Only FIGO stage, cyclin D1, p27 (Kip1) and Ki-67 are independent prognostic factors that might help in predicting outcome of cervical cancer patients.