Clinical Significance of Somatic Mutations in RAS/RAF/MAPK Signaling Pathway in Moroccan and North African Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background: Mutations in RAS (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF genes are the main biomarker predicting response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC). Objective: Our study aims to evaluate the frequencies of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations and their possible associations with clinico-pathological features in CRC patients from Morocco. Methods: DNA was extracted from 80 FFPE samples using the QIAamp DNA FFPE-kit. RAS and BRAF mutations were assessed by pyrosequencing assays using Qiagen, KRAS Pyro®kit 24.V1, Ras-Extension Pyro®kit 24.V1 and BRAF Pyro®Kit 24.V1, respectively, and carried out in the PyroMark-Q24. Results: RAS mutations were identified in 57.5% (56.2% in KRAS, 8.8% in NRAS). In KRAS gene, exon 2 mutations accounted for 93.3% (68.9% in codon 12, 24.4% in codon 13). Within codon 12, G12D was the most prevalent mutation (37.7%), followed by G12C (13.4%), G12S (8.9%) and G12V (6.6%). Within codon 13, the most frequently observed mutation was G13D (22.3%). The mutation rates of exon 3 and 4 were 15.6% and 13.3%, respectively. In exon 3 codon 61, 2.3% patients were detected with two concurrent mutations (Q61R, Q61H), and 4.4% with three concurrent mutations (Q61R, Q61H, Q61L). In NRAS gene, the mutation rates of exon 2, 3 and 4 were 57.1%, 28.6%, and 14.3%, respectively. G13A and Q61H were the most common mutations, accounting for 42.9% and 28.5%, respectively. There were 13% patients with concurrent KRAS/NRAS mutation and 4.3% wt KRAS with NRAS mutations. No mutations were identified in BRAF gene. In both sexes, KRAS codon 12 mutations were associated with higher stage III/IV tumors. Moreover, Patients whose tumor is in the proximal colon (56.3%) are more likely to harbor KRAS mutations than those tumor located in rectum (25%). Conclusion: RAS mutations could be useful in future target anti-EGFR therapy and molecular CRC screening strategy in Morocco.     

Molecular spectrum of KRAS,BRAF, and PIK3CA gene mutation: determination of frequency,distribution pattern in Indian colorectal carcinoma

Molecular evaluation of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation has become an important part in colorectal carcinoma evaluation, and their alterations may determine the therapeutic response to anti-EGFR therapy. The current study demonstrates the evaluation of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation using direct sequencing in 204 samples. The frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations was 23.5, 9.8, and 5.9 %, respectively. Five different substitution mutations at KRAS codon 12 (G12S, G12D, G12A, G12V, and G12C) and one substitution type at codon 13 (G13D) were observed. KRAS mutations were significantly higher in patients who were >50 years, and were associated with moderate/poorly differentiated tumors and adenocarcinomas. All mutations in BRAF gene were of V600E type, which were frequent in patients who were ≤50 years. Unlike KRAS mutations, BRAF mutations were more frequent in well-differentiated tumors and right-sided tumors. PIK3CA–E545K was the most recurrent mutation while other mutations detected were T544I, Q546R, H1047R, G1049S, and D1056N. No significant association of PIK3CA mutation with age, tumor differentiation, location, and other parameters was noted. No concomitant mutation of KRAS and BRAF mutations was observed, while, interestingly, five cases showed concurrent mutation of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the PIK3CA mutation in Indian CRC patients. The frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA was similar to worldwide reports. Furthermore, identification of molecular markers has unique strengths, and can provide insights into the pathogenic process and help optimize personalized prevention and therapy.     

KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in human colorectal cancer: relationship with metastatic colorectal cancer

Many abnormal gene expressions and dysregulated signaling pathways have been found in human colorectal cancer. Activating mutations of the KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA oncogenes are frequently found in colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to investigate the molecular occurrence of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in the colorectal tumorigenesis and to study the association of these events with clinicopathological parameters. In our study, DNA was extracted from 200 cases of human colorectal cancer tissue samples. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutation analysis was performed by PCR and pyrosequencing. Using statistical methods, we analyzed the relationships between the gene mutations and clinicopathological parameters. KRAS point mutations were detected in 63/200 patients (31.5%), with codon 12 mutations in 52/200 patients (26%), codon 13 mutations in 10/200 patients (5%) and codon 12.13 bi-mutations in 1/200 patients (0.5%). The V600E mutations of BRAF were detected in 14/200 patients (7%). PIK3CA point mutations (exon 9, exon 20) were detected in 25/200 (12.5%) patients, exon 9 mutatons in 12/200 patients (6%) and exon 20 mutations in 13/200 (6.5%). Our study suggested that both KRAS and BRAF mutations are exclusive, but KRAS and PIK3CA mutations are coexistent. The mutational status of BRAF did not correlate with Dukes' staging, histological type, age and gender. However, strong associations were found between KRAS, PIK3CA mutations and Dukes' staging (staging D, 12/25, 48%). Notably, our data indicated that colorectal cancers with KRAS and PIK3CA bi-mutations are more likely to develop into liver metastasis.     

Mutation Analysis of KRAS and BRAF Genes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a First Large Scale Study from Iran

Background: The investigation of mutation patterns in oncogenes potentially can make available a reliable mechanism for management and treatment decisions for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study concerns the rate of KRAS and BRAF genes mutations in Iranian metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, as well as associations of genotypes with clinicopathological features. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,000 mCRC specimens collected from 2008 to 2012 that referred to the Mehr Hospital and Partolab center, Tehran, Iran enrolled in this cross sectional study. Using HRM, Dxs Therascreen and Pyrosequencing methods, we analyzed the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF genes in these. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 33.6% cases (n=336). Of KRAS mutation positive cases, 85.1% were in codon 12 and 14.9% were in codon 13. The most frequent mutation at KRAS codon 12 was Gly12Asp; BRAF mutations were not found in any mCRC patients (n=242). In addition, we observed a strong correlation of KRAS mutations with some clinicopathological characteristics. Conclusions: KRAS mutations are frequent in mCRCs while presence of BRAF mutations in these patients is rare. Moreover, associations of KRAS genotypes with non mucinous adenocarcinoma and depth of invasion (pT3) were remarkable.     

结直肠癌患者血清外泌体代替肿瘤组织检测K-Ras基因突变的研究*

目的 探讨结直肠癌患者血清外泌体代替肿瘤组织进行DNA中K-Ras基因12密码子突变检测的价值。方法 收集2014年5月至2015年9月于我院病理组织学诊断为局部晚期或转移性结直肠癌患者的外周血标本90例,使用ExoQuick试剂提取血清外泌体,盐析法提取外泌体及血细胞DNA,采用PCR方法扩增K-Ras基因12密码子并通过高通量测序法检测突变,比较血清外泌体DNA与血细胞DNA突变的特异性,比较外泌体与组织学检测的K-Ras基因12密码子突变情况。结果 90例结直肠癌患者中检测出外泌体K-Ras基因12密码子突变43例,突变率为47.8％。全组共检出4种突变类型,以G12D突变率为最高。与组织学检测比较,灵敏度为90.6％,一致性为81.1％（Kappa值=0.62,P＜0.05）。结论 血清外泌体DNA用于检测肿瘤相关突变,与肿瘤组织相比一致性较高,可作为液体活检的来源指导肿瘤的个体化治疗。     

Clinical and molecular detection of inherited colorectal cancers in northeast Italy: a first prospective study of incidence of Lynch syndrome and MUTYH-related colorectal cancer in Italy

The reported incidence of hereditary colorectal cancers (CRCs) is widely variable. The principal aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of familial CRCs in a region of northern Italy using a standardized method. Consecutive CRC patients were prospectively enrolled from October 2002 to December 2003. Patients underwent a structured family history, the microsatellite instability (MSI) test and a screen for MUTYH mutations. Following family history patients were classified as belonging to high, moderate and mild risk families. Immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 proteins and investigation for MLH1/MSH2 mutations, for MLH1 promoter methylation and for the V600E hotspot BRAF mutation were performed in high MSI (MSI-H) cases. Of the 430 patients enrolled, 17 (4%) were high risk [4 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), 12 suspected HNPCC and 1 MUTYH-associated adenomatous polyposis coli (MAP)], 53 moderate risk and 360 mild risk cases. The MSI test was performed on 393 tumours, and 46 (12%) of them showed MSI-H. In these patients, one MLH1 pathogenetic mutations and two MSH2 pathogenetic mutations were found. Thirty-two (70%) MSI-H cases demonstrated MLH1 methylation and/or BRAF mutation: None of them showed MLH1/MSH2 mutation. Two biallelic germline MUTYH mutations were found, one with clinical features of MAP. A strong family history of CRC was present in 4% of the enrolled cases; incidence of MLH1/MSH2 or MUTHY mutations was 1.3% and of MSI-H phenotype was 12%. MLH1 methylation and BRAF mutation can exclude 70% of MSI-H cases from gene sequencing.     

K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy

PURPOSE: K-Ras mutations predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. Because combinations of anti-EGFR with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy are promising treatments, we analyzed the effect of K-Ras mutations in patients having received exclusive 5-FU therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This study was conducted on 93 stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable measurable liver metastasis receiving 5-FU-leucovorin (56 men and 37 women; 77 cancer deaths). Liver metastases (n = 93) along with primary tumors (n = 48) were analyzed for K-Ras mutations (codons 12 and 13), p53 mutations (exons 4-9), p53 polymorphism (codon 72), thymidylate synthase (TS) polymorphism (28-bp repeats including G>C mutation), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism (677C>T, 1298A>C), thymidylate synthase (TS) activity, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, folylpolyglutamate synthase activity, and p53 protein expression. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 93 (38.7%) metastases were K-Ras mutated (30 at codon 12 and 6 at codon 13). Mutated primary tumors (16 of 48) matched perfectly with mutated metastases. The additional analyzed tumor markers were not different between K-Ras mutated and wild-type tumors. The objective response rate was 37%: 44.4% in K-Ras mutated versus 32.1% in wild-type K-Ras metastasis (P = 0.27). Low TS activity in metastasis was the only significant predictor of tumor response (P = 0.047). K-Ras status did not influence specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate a perfect concordance of K-Ras mutations between primary and liver metastasis and suggest that any predictive and/or prognostic value of K-Ras mutations in treatments combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies with 5-FU should be exclusively linked to the anti-EGFR agent.     

Distribution of KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in Turkish Patients

The results of this study demonstrate the potential prognostic and predictive values of KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). It has been proven that KRAS and BRAF mutations are predictive biomarkers for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We demonstrated the distribution of KRAS (codons 12, 13 and 61) and BRAF (codon 600) gene mutations in 50 mCRCs using direct sequencing and compared the results with clinicopathological data. KRAS and BRAF mutations were identified in 15 (30%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. We identified KRAS mutations in codon 12, 13 and 61 in 73.3% (11/15), 20% (3/15) and 6.67% (1/15) of the positive patients, respectively. The KRAS mutation frequency was significantly higher in tumors located in the ascending colon (p=0.043). Thus, we found that approximately 1/3 of the patients with mCRC had KRAS mutations and the only clinicopathological factor related to this mutation was tumor location. Future studies with larger patient groups should yield more accurate data regarding the molecular mechanism of CRC and the association between KRAS and BRAF mutations and clinicopathological features.     

Colorectal cancer with mutation in BRAF, KRAS, and wild-type with respect to both oncogenes showing different patterns of DNA methylation.

PURPOSE: BRAF mutations are common in sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs) with a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency that results from promoter methylation of hMLH1, whereas KRAS mutations are common in MMR proficient CRCs associated with promoter methylation of MGMT. The aim of this study was to further investigate the link between genetic alterations in the RAS/RAF/ERK pathway and an underlying epigenetic disorder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Activating mutations of BRAF and KRAS were identified and correlated with promoter methylation of 11 loci, including MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, CACNA1G, p16(INK4a), p14(ARF), COX2, DAPK, MGMT, and the two regions in hMLH1 in 468 CRCs and matched normal mucosa. RESULTS: BRAF V599E mutations were identified in 21 (9%) of 234 CRCs, and KRAS mutations were identified in 72 (31%) of 234 CRCs. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS were never found in the same tumor. CRCs with BRAF mutations showed high-level promoter methylation in multiple loci, with a mean number of methylated loci of 7.2 (95% CI, 6.6 to 7.9) among 11 loci examined (P < .0001). Tumors with KRAS mutations showed low-level promoter methylation, and CRCs with neither mutation showed a weak association with promoter methylation, with an average number of methylated loci of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1) and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: In CRC, the methylation status of multiple promoters can be predicted through knowledge of BRAF and, to a lesser extent, KRAS activating mutations, indicating that these mutations are closely associated with different patterns of DNA hypermethylation. These changes may be important events in colorectal tumorigenesis.     

Is availability of anti-EGFR therapy for the colorectal adenocarcinomas showing fascin expression limited?

Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) is a major cause of death. Fascin expression in CRCs was proved to be related with higher metastatic rates and poor prognosis, while metastatic patients with only wild type K-RAS gene are the candidates of recent molecularly targeted anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies. This study is designed to investigate the correlation between the fascin expression status and the K-RAS mutational status of CRCs in order to assess the availability rate of anti-EGFR therapies for patients with fascin-expressing CRCs. Immunohistochemical expression of fascin and mutational status of K-RAS were investigated in the archival materials of randomly selected 50 metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients. Strength of fascin expression and tumor percentage stained with fascin were scored semi quantitatively. c.34?>?C (p.G12R), c.35 g?>?C (p.G12C), c.34G?>?A (p.G12S), c.35G?>?A (p.G12D), c.35G?>?T (p.G12V), c.35G?>?C (p.G12A), and c.38G?>?A (p.G13.D) mutations in K-RAS gene were studied by using RT-PCR. In immunohistochemical evaluation, 32 of the 50 cases stained positive with fascin, while 21 were positive for K-RAS mutations in codon 12 (10 patients) or in codon 13 (3 patients). The correlation between the positivity of fascin and the presence of K-RAS mutations, the strength of fascin staining and the presence of K-RAS mutations, and the tumor cell percentage stained with fascin and the presence of K-RAS mutations were found statistically significant. The results of this study suggest that patients with fascin-expressing CRCs have a greater tendency to carry an activating K-RAS mutation which will prevent them from taking targeted anti-EGFR therapies. Larger series are needed to confirm these results.     

BRAF mutations characterize colon but not gastric cancer with mismatch repair deficiency

Genes from the RAF family are Ras-regulated kinases involved in growth cellular responses. Recently, a V599E hotspot mutation within the BRAF gene was reported in a high percentage of colorectal tumors and significantly associated to defective mismatch repair (MMR). Additionally, BRAF mutations were described only in K-Ras-negative colon carcinomas, suggesting that BRAF/K-Ras activating mutations might be alternative genetic events in colon cancer. We have addressed to what extent the tumorigenic-positive selection exerted by BRAF mutations seen in colorectal MMR-deficient tumors was also involved in the tumorigenesis of gastric cancer. Accordingly, BRAF mutations were detected in 34% (25/74) of colorectal MMR-deficient tumors and in 5% (7/142) of MMR-proficient colorectal cases (P=0.0001). All mutations found in the MSI cases corresponded to the previously reported hotspot V599E. Two D593K and a K600E additional mutations were also detected in three MSS cases. However, only one mutation of BRAF was found within 124 MSS gastric tumors and none in 37 MSI gastric tumors, clearly suggesting that BRAF mutations are not involved in gastric tumorigenesis. Nonetheless, a high incidence of mutations of K-Ras was found within the MSI gastric group of tumors (P=0.0005), suggesting that the activation of K-Ras-dependent pathways contributes to the tumorigenesis of gastric cancers with MMR deficiency. Accordingly, our results show evidences that BRAF mutations characterize colon but not gastric tumors with MMR deficiency and are not involved in the tumorigenesis of gastric cancer of the mutator phenotype pathway.     

结直肠癌Ras、BRAF和PIK3CA基因突变分析及与临床病理特征的关系

目的 分析结直肠癌患者中Ras（K-Ras／N-Ras）、BRAF和PIK3CA基因突变情况及其与临床病理特征的关系。方法 回顾性分析2013年12月至2014年10月于北京大学肿瘤医院消化肿瘤内科接受诊治的200例结直肠癌患者的肿瘤组织标本,采用PCR扩增-直接测序法检测Ras,包括K-Ras（第2、3、4外显子）、N-Ras（第2、3、4外显子）、BRAF（第15外显子）及PIK3CA（第9、20外显子）基因的突变状态,分析其与结直肠癌临床病理特征的关系。结果 200例患者中存在Ras基因突变92例（46.0％）,其中K-Ras基因突变87例（43.5％）,主要发生在外显子2,N-Ras基因突变5例（2.5％）;其中1例患者存在K-Ras、N-Ras基因同时突变。存在BRAF基因突变15例（7.5％）,突变类型均为V600E,且与K-Ras突变存在排他性。存在PIK3CA基因突变9例（4.5％）,可与Ras或BRAF基因突变共存。Ras（K-Ras／N-Ras）基因在年龄≥65岁患者中的突变率明显高于＜65岁者（P＜0.05）,其表达与性别、原发部位、组织学类型、分化程度、TNM分期、区域淋巴结转移、远处转移、术后复发转移均无关（P均＞0.05）。BRAF、PIK3CA基因在原发部位为右半结肠患者中的突变率明显升高（P＜0.05）,但与年龄、性别、组织学类型、分化程度、TNM分期、区域淋巴结转移、远处转移、术后复发转移均无关（P＞0.05）。结论 N-Ras、PIK3CA基因在中国结直肠癌患者中的突变率较低。K-Ras、N-Ras基因突变与年龄相关,BRAF、PIK3CA基因与肿瘤原发部位相关;对结直肠癌患者进行Ras（K-Ras／N-Ras）、BRAF及PIK3CA基因的联合检测将会为提高临床靶向治疗的疗效提供更加可靠的依据。     

K-Ras gene mutation status as a prognostic and predictive factor in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

Background: CRC caused more than 600,000 estimated deaths in 2008. Dysregulated signaling through the RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway due to mutations in K-Ras and B-Raf are common events in CRC. Methods: Incidence of mutations in codons 12 and 13 of K-Ras and exons 11 and 15 of B-Raf were analyzed in amplified PCR products from primary tumors of 273 patients with CRC, and their prognostic and predictive significance was assessed. The prognostic role of clinical and pathological factors was also examined. Results: K-Ras mutations were present in 89 patients (32.6%), of whom 76 (85.4%) had mutations in codon 12 and 10 (11.2%) had mutations in codon 13. B-Raf gene mutations were present in 17 patients (6.9%), of whom 6 (35.3%) had mutations in exon 15. Multivariate analysis revealed a predictive significance for K-Ras mutations with respect to time to progression in patients treated with irinotecan and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy. There was no predictive significance for B-Raf gene mutation status in these patients. The following risk factors were found to affect overall survival (OS) rates: primary tumor location, lymph node involvement grade, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level before treatment, and performance status according to WHO criteria. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, K-Ras mutation status may be a suitable indicator of patient eligibility and a prognostic indicator for responsiveness to anti-EGFR therapy alone, or in combination with chemotherapy. Also, K-Ras mutation status may predict time to progression in patients treated with irinotecan and oxaliplatin.     

中国非小细胞肺癌患者K-Ras和EGFR基因突变与临床病理特征的关系

目的 探讨中国非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者中K-Ras和表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）基因突变情况及其与临床病理特征的关系。方法 回顾性分析2011年7月至2013年8月广州医科大学附属第一医院收治的381例NSCLC患者的临床病理特征,并应用扩增突变阻滞系统（ARMS）检测其癌组织中EGFR基因18、19、20、21外显子共21个点突变和K-Ras基因12、13密码子共6个点突变,分析其突变情况及与临床病理特征的相关性。结果 21例（5.5％）存在K-Ras基因突变,其中20例12密码子,1例13密码子Asp突变;146例（38.3％）存在EGFR突变,其中4例18外显子突变（G719S）,52例19号外显子序列缺失突变,3例20外显子序列缺失突变,85例21外显子突变（81例L858R,4例L861Q）,2例双突变。男性患者K-Ras基因突变率高于女性患者,差异有统计学意义（6.8％ vs. 2.5％, P=0.018）。EGFR基因突变与性别、吸烟史、临床分期、全身转移、病理类型均有关（P＜0.05）。二分类Logistic回归分析显示,病理类型和性别与EGFR基因突变密切相关。结论 中国NSCLC患者中EGFR突变常见,该突变与腺癌有关;K-Ras基因突变率较低,多见于男性,其他相关因素尚需进一步研究。     

结直肠癌组织中KRAS和BRAF基因突变与临床病理特征及预后的关系

目的:探讨结直肠癌组织中KRAS和BRAF基因突变与临床病理和预后的关系。方法:采用扩增阻滞突变系统（ARMS）方法对134例结直肠癌组织进行回顾性分析。结果:134例CRC组织中KRAS基因突变率49.3%（66/134）,第2外显子突变率42.5%（57/134）,其中12及13密码子突变率分别为35.1%（47/134）和7.5%（10/134）,第3外显子61密码子突变率1.5%（2/134）,第4外显子117/146密码子突变率5.2%（7/134）,BRAF V600E突变率4.5%（6/134）。左半结肠KRAS基因突变率54.5%（54/99）高于右半结肠34.3%（12/35）,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,右半结肠BRAF基因突变率14.3%（5/35）高于左半结肠1.0%（1/99）,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,而KRAS和BRAF基因突变与性别、年龄、民族、肿块大小、分化程度、淋巴结转移及病理分期等临床病理特征,差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。KRAS基因突变型CRC患者的中位生存时间48个月（39.9%）,与野生型47个月（46.2%）相比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。BRAF基因突变型CRC患者的中位生存时间21个月（26.7%）,与野生型48个月（44.7%）相比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。多因素COX回归风险模型结果显示,BRAF基因突变型是CRC患者预后不良的独立危险因素（B=1.664,OR=5.278,95%CI:1.505~18.516, P＜0.05）,而性别、年龄、民族、肿块大小、分化程度、肿瘤部位、淋巴结转移及病理分期均不是CRC患者生存时间的独立危险因素（P＞0.05）。结论:CRC组织中KRAS基因突变率高,BRAF基因突变率低。KRAS和BRAF基因突变型与肿瘤部位有关。BRAF基因突变型是CRC预后不良的独立危险因素。     

The balanced induction of K-ras codon 12 and 13 mutations in mucosa differs from their ratio in neoplastic tissues

The aim of this study was to compare the ratio of K-ras codon 12 and 13 mutations in various tissues of colorectal cancer patients. Multiple samples of inconspicuous mucosa and a sample of carcinoma tissue were taken from 36 colorectal cancer patients (group I) and these results were compared with those from polyp and carcinoma tissues of another 48 colorectal cancer patients (group II). A polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was used to detect the respective point mutations. The results of this assay were complemented by sequencing the K-ras mutations. In mucosa tissue, the ratio of codon 12 and 13 mutations was nearly equal (0.9:1) whereas the respective ratio in tumour tissue showed a strong preponderance of K-ras codon 12 mutations (14:1, p=0.004). In polyp tissue of patients from group II, the ratio was 2.7:1 and that in carcinomas was 19:1 (p=0.053). The prevalence of both types of mutation was 14.6% in all mucosa samples, corresponding to 30.6% of group I patients. The K-ras mutation rate in carcinoma tissue of the same patients was 38.9%. Similarly, 33.4% of all polyp and 41.7% of all carcinoma samples from group II harboured K-ras codon 12 and/or 13 mutations. Sequencing confirmed 59 of 60 K-ras codon 12 mutations, but due to the detection limit for sequencing (1:10(4)) only 10 of 20 K-ras codon 13 mutations were confirmed. It is concluded that after balanced induction K-ras codon 12 mutations increase in frequency relative to K-ras codon 13 mutations during tumour progression.     

Mutational analysis of the BRAF gene in colorectal mucinous carcinoma in association with histological configuration

Genetic alterations and their association with clinicopathological features in colorectal mucinous carcinoma (MC) remain unknown. In particular, little is known about the mutational status of the BRAF gene, which is activated by oncogenic Ras. This study aimed to evaluate the status of BRAF together with K-ras, p53 and mismatch-repair deficiency to clarify their association with tumorigenesis of colorectal MC. BRAF and K-ras mutations were determined in 43 colorectal MCs by direct sequencing. p53 alteration was investigated immunohistochemically. The status of mismatch-repair deficiency was assessed by microsatellite analyses and immunohistochemistry for hMLH1. We also examined the association between these molecular alterations and clinicopathological features including histological configuration. BRAF mutation was detected in 4 (9.3%) tumors and was located at codon 599 of exon 15 in all cases. K-ras mutation was detected in 13 tumors (30.2%). No BRAF and K-ras mutations were identified simultaneously in the same tumor. The incidence of mismatch-repair deficiency tended to be higher in MC with BRAF mutation than without. In terms of histological configuration, we classified the cases according to growth type by tumor edge morphology. All MCs with BRAF mutation and 9 of 13 MCs (69.2%) with K-ras mutation were classified as polypoid type. BRAF and K-ras mutation did not affect patient prognosis, but non polypoid type was significantly more aggressive than polypoid type. Our findings indicate that BRAF mutation plays an important role in the tumorigenesis of colorectal MC and in tumor edge morphology, similar to K-ras mutation.     

k-ras 基因突变与结直肠癌的关系

 目的　探讨k-ras 基因在结直肠癌患者中的突变状况,为k-ras基因突变检测提供理论依据。方法　提取基因组DNA,采用PCR扩增和双向直接测序法,检测56例结直肠癌k-ras基因的突变状况。结果　56例结直肠癌中k-ras基因的突变率为46.63 %（26／56）,其中20例（20／26,76.92 %）为密码子12的突变,6例（6／26,23.08 %）为密码子13的突变,未发现同时存在两个位点突变的样本。突变类型以G>A为主,密码子12的突变以GGT>GAT（G12D）为主。密码子13的突变以GGC>GAC为主。统计学分析发现,k-ras基因突变与患者的性别密切相关而与其他临床病理特征如：肿瘤发生部位、有无淋巴结转移等无关。结论　在结直肠癌患者中,k-ras基因突变主要发生于密码子12;突变类型以G>A为主;k-ras基因的突变可能与患者的性别相关。     

The influence of KRAS and BRAF mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab-based first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104-trial

Our study investigated the impact of specific KRAS mutations and BRAF mutation on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated within the AIO KRK-0104-trial as first-line therapy. In total, 146 (of 185) patients were included in this analysis. Seventy-nine patients presented with KRAS/BRAF wild-type (wt), 41 patients with a KRAS codon 12 and nine patients with a KRAS codon 13 mutation. Seventeen patients presented a BRAF-mutated tumor. The patients of our study were treated with CAPIRI/CAPOX plus cetuximab. Major differences regarding PFS and OS were observed depending on the mutation of the tumor. PFS was 8 months in patients with wt-tumors, 5.8 months with codon 12-mutated, 9.9 months with codon 13-mutated and 4.2 months with BRAF-mutated tumors. OS was 23.5 months in patients with wt-tumors, 18.9 months with codon 12-mutated, 26.2 months with codon 13-mutated and 13.0 months with BRAF-mutated tumors. Although the conventional separation of patients with KRAS wild-type versus KRAS mutant tumors did not have a significant impact on outcome parameters in the AIO KRK 0104-trial, this analysis demonstrates that markedly differing results are obtained when subtypes of KRAS and BRAF mutation are taken into account.     

Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in correlation with BRAF V600E and different KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis

Background

KRAS mutation status in codons 12 and 13 is recognized as a predictive factor for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Despite having a wild type KRAS (wt-KRAS), not all patients with wt-KRAS respond to anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Additional mechanisms of resistance may activate mutations of the other main EGFR effectors pathway. Consequently, other molecular markers in colorectal cancer are needed to be evaluated to predict the response to therapy.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, objective responses (OR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 176 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy in combination with monoclonal antibodies in respect of KRAS status in codons 12 and 13 and BRAF mutational status.

Results

The KRAS mutations were found in 63 patients (35.8 %), the KRAS mutation in codon 12 in 53 patients (30.1%) and the KRAS mutation in codon 13 in 10 patients (5.7%). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 13 of 176 patients (7.4%). In the subgroup of mCRC patients having wt-KRAS and wild type BRAF (wt-BRAF), the objective response rates were higher (OR 54.0% ,CR 14.7%, PR 39.3%) than in the patients with wt-KRAS and mt-BRAF (OR 38.5%,CR 15.4%, PR 23.1%), the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.378). Median OS in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 107.4 months and 45 months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p= 0.042). TTP in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 16 months and 12 months, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.558).

Conclusions

Patients with BRAF V600E mutation have statistically significantly worse prognosis than the patients with wt-BRAF and progress earlier during treatment. The definitive role of the BRAF V600E mutation as a prognostic and predictive factor for the response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies needs to be analyzed in large prospective clinical studies.