Cerebral Blood Flow and CO2 Reactivity Is Similar during Remifentanil/N2 O and Fentanyl/N2 O Anesthesia

Background: Remifentanil, a rapidly metabolized [micro sign]-opioid agonist, may offer advantages for neurosurgical procedures in which prolonged anesthetic effects can delay assessment of the patient. This study compared the effects of remifentanil-nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and carbon dioxide reactivity with those of fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia during craniotomy.

Methods: After institutional approval and informed patient consent were obtained, 23 patients scheduled to undergo supratentorial tumor surgery were randomly assigned to remifentanil or fentanyl infusion groups in a double-blinded manner. Midazolam, thiopental, and pancuronium induction was followed by equipotent narcotic loading infusions of remifentanil (1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or fentanyl (2 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) for 5-10 min. Patients were ventilated with 2:1 nitrous oxide-oxygen, and opioid rates were reduced and then titrated to a stable hemodynamic effect. After dural exposure, CBF was measured by the intravenous133 xenon technique at normocapnia and hypocapnia. Reactivity of CBF to carbon dioxide was calculated as the absolute increase in CBF per millimeters of mercury increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, unpaired Student's t tests, or contingency analysis.

Results: In the remifentanil group (n = 10), CBF decreased from 36 +/- 11 to 27 +/- 8 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 33 +/- 5 to 25 +/- 2 mmHg. In the fentanyl group (n = 8), CBF decreased from 37 +/- 11 to 25 +/- 6 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 34 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 3 mmHg. Absolute carbon dioxide reactivity was preserved with both agents: 1 +/- 1.2 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for remifentanil and 1.5 +/- 0.5 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for fentanyl (P = 0.318).     

Comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions as adjuvants to desflurane anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Because adenosine has been alleged to produce both anesthetic and analgesic sparing effects, a randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the perioperative effects of adenosine and remifentanil when administered as intravenous adjuvants during general anesthesia for major gynecologic procedures. METHODS: Thirty-two women were assigned randomly to one of two drug treatment groups. After premedication with 0.04 mg/kg intravenous midazolam, anesthesia was induced with 2 micro/kg intravenous fentanyl, 1.5 mg/kg intravenous propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg intravenous rocuronium, and maintained with desflurane, 2%, and nitrous oxide, 65%, in oxygen. Before skin incision, an infusion of either remifentanil (0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or adenosine (25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started and subsequently titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or both within 10-15% of the preincision values. RESULTS: Adenosine and remifentanil infusions were effective anesthetic adjuvants during lower abdominal surgery. Use of adenosine (mean +/- SEM, 166+/-17 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was associated with a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate values compared with remifentanil (mean +/- SEM, 0.2+/-0.03 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)). Total postoperative opioid analgesic use was 45% and 27% lower in the adenosine group at 0-2 h and 2-24 h after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of a variable-rate infusion of adenosine during desflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia was associated with acceptable hemodynamic stability during the intraoperative period. Compared with remifentanil, intraoperative use of adenosine was associated with a decreased requirement for opioid analgesics during the first 24 h after operation.     

Prophylactic Angiotensin II Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery

Background: Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes less uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such as phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given either prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Methods: Fifty-four women were randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intravenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section delivery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin II (2.5 [micro sign]g/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and 50 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1, respectively. The rate of each infusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90-100% of baseline.

Results: Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean +/- SD) through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150 +/- 100, 310 +/- 180, and 500 +/- 320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480 +/- 210, 660 +/- 390, and 790 +/- 640 [micro sign]g/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin group. Umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group.     

Narcotrend Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and a Reduction of Drug Consumption in Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia

Background: The Narcotrend is a new electroencephalographic monitor designed to measure depth of anesthesia, based on a six-letter classification from A (awake) to F (increasing burst suppression) including 14 substages. This study was designed to investigate the impact of Narcotrend monitoring on recovery times and propofol consumption in comparison to Bispectral Index(R) (BIS(R)) monitoring or standard anesthetic practice.

Methods: With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 120 adult patients scheduled to undergo minor orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive a propofol-remifentanil anesthetic controlled by Narcotrend, by BIS(R), or solely by clinical parameters. Anesthesia was induced with 0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil and a propofol target-controlled infusion at 3.5 [mu]g/ml. After intubation, remifentanil was reduced to 0.2 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1, whereas the propofol infusion was adjusted according to clinical parameters or to the following target values: during maintenance to D0 (Narcotrend) or 50 (BIS(R)); 15 min before the end of surgery to C1 (Narcotrend) or 60 (BIS(R)). Recovery times were recorded by a blinded investigator, and average normalized propofol consumption was calculated from induction and maintenance doses.

Results: The groups were comparable for demographic data, duration of anesthesia, and mean remifentanil dosages. Compared with standard practice, patients with Narcotrend or BIS(R) monitoring needed significantly less propofol (standard practice, 6.8 +/- 1.2 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1vs. Narcotrend, 4.5 +/- 1.1 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 or BIS(R), 4.8 +/- 1.0 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1;P < 0.001), opened their eyes earlier (9.3 +/- 5.2 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.2 or 3.5 +/- 2.9 min), and were extubated sooner (9.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 2.2 or 4.1 +/- 2.9 min).     

Assessment of Depth of Anesthesia and Postoperative Respiratory Recovery after Remifentanil-versus Alfentanil-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ear-Nose-Throat Surgery

Background: The authors investigated whether total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with precalculated equipotent infusion schemes for remifentanil and alfentanil would ensure appropriate analgesia and that remifentanil would result in better recovery characteristics.

Methods: Forty consenting patients (classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) scheduled for microlaryngoscopy were randomized to receive, in a double-blind manner, either remifentanil (loading dose 1 [mu]g/kg; maintenance infusion, 0.25 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or alfentanil (loading dose, 50 [mu]g/kg; maintenance infusion, 1 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) as the analgesic component of TIVA. They were combined with propofol (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; maintenance infusion, 100 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1). To insure an equal state of anesthesia, the opioids were titrated to maintain heart rate and mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline, and propofol was titrated to keep the bispectral index (BIS) less than 60. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with succinylcholine. Drug dosages and the times from cessation of anesthesia to extubation, verbal response, recovery of ventilation, and neuropsychological testing, orientation, and discharge readiness were recorded.

Results: Demographics, duration of surgery, and anesthesia were similar between the two groups. Both groups received similar propofol doses. There were no difference in BIS values preoperatively (mean, 96), intraoperatively (mean, 55), and postoperatively (mean, 96). Recovery of BIS and times for verbal response did not differ. At 20, 30, and 40 min after terminating the opioid infusion, the peripheral oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were significantly higher in the remifentanil group compared with the alfentanil group.     

The Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil and Its Metabolite, GR90291, in a Rat Electroencephalographic Model

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo pharmacodynamics and the pharmacodynamic interactions of remifentanil and its major metabolite, GR90291, in a rat electroencephalographic model.

Methods: Remifentanil and GR90291 were administered according to a stepwise infusion scheme. The time course of the electroencephalographic effect (0.5-4.5 Hz) was determined in conjunction with concentrations of the parent drug and the metabolite in blood.

Results: Administration of remifentanil resulted in concentrations of remifentanil and GR90291 in the ranges 0-120 ng/ml and 0-850 ng/ml, respectively. When the metabolite was administered, concentrations of the metabolite in the range 0-220 [micro sign]g/ml and no measurable concentrations of remifentanil were observed. The mean +/- SE values of the pharmacokinetic parameters clearance and volume of distribution at steady state were 920 +/- 110 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1 and 1.00 +/- 0.931/kg for remifentanil and 15 +/- 2 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1 and 0.56 +/- 0.08 1/kg for GR90291. The relative free concentrations in the brain, as determined on the basis of the cerebrospinal fluid/total blood concentration ratio at steady state, were 25 +/- 5% and 0.30 +/- 0.11% for remifentanil and GR90291, respectively. Concentration-electroencephalographic effect relations were characterized on the basis of the sigmoidal Emax pharmacodynamic model. The mean +/- SE values for the maximal effect (Emax), the concentration at which 50% of the maximal effect is obtained (EC50), and Hill factor for remifentanil were 109 +/- 12 [micro sign]V, 9.4 +/- 0.9 ng/ml, and 2.2 +/- 0.3, respectively (n = 8). For GR90291, the mean +/- SE values for EC50 and the Hill factor were 103,000 +/- 9,000 [micro sign]g/ml and 2.5 +/- 0.4, respectively (n = 6).     

Intravenous Remifentanil: Placental Transfer, Maternal and Neonatal Effects

Background: Remifentanil has not been studied in obstetric patients. This study evaluates the placental transfer of remifentanil and the neonatal effects when administered as an intravenous infusion.

Methods: Nineteen parturients underwent nonemergent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia and received 0.1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil intravenously, which was continued until skin closure. Maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood samples were obtained at delivery for analysis of drug concentrations of remifentanil, its metabolite, and blood gases. Maternal vital signs were monitored continuously, and pain and sedation levels were assessed intermittently. Apgar scores were obtained at 1, 5, 10, and 20 min, and Neonatal and Adaptive Capacity Scores were noted 30 and 60 min after delivery. Parturients and newborns were observed for at least 24 h after surgery for side effects.

Results: The means and SDs of UV:MA and UA:UV ratios for remifentanil were 0.88 +/- 0.78 and 0.29 +/- 0.07, respectively. Mean clearance was 93 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1. The mean UV:MA and UA:MV ratios for remifentanil acid were 0.56 +/- 0.29 and 1.23 +/- 0.89, respectively. The mean MA (remifentanil acid):MA (remifentanil) ratio was 2.92 +/- 3.65. There were no adverse effects on the neonates, but there was a sedative effect and respiratory depressant effect on the mothers.     

Remifentanil Requirements during Sevoflurane Administration to Block Somatic and Cardiovascular Responses to Skin Incision in Children and Adults

Background: The authors found no studies comparing intraoperative requirements of opioids between children and adults, so they determined the infusion rate of remifentanil to block somatic (IR50) and autonomic response (IRBAR50) to skin incision in children and adults.

Methods: Forty-one adults (aged 20-60 yr) and 24 children (aged 2-10 yr) undergoing lower abdominal surgery were studied. In adults, anesthesia induction was with sevoflurane during remifentanil infusion, whereas in children remifentanil administration was started after induction with sevoflurane. After intubation, sevoflurane was administered in 100% O2 and was adjusted to an ET% of 1 MAC-awake corrected for age at least 15 min before surgery. Patients were randomized to receive remifentanil at a rate ranging from 0.05 to 0.35 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 for at least 20 min before surgery. At the beginning of surgery, only the skin incision was performed, and the somatic and autonomic responses were observed. The somatic response was defined as positive with any gross movement of extremity, and the autonomic response was deemed positive with any increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure equal to or more than 10% of preincision values. Using logistic regression, the IR50 and IRBAR50 were determined in both groups of patients and compared with unpaired Student t test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The IR50 +/- SD was 0.10 +/- 0.02 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in adults and 0.22 +/- 0.03 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in children (P < 0.001). The IRBAR50 +/- SD was 0.11 +/- 0.02 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in adults and 0.27 +/- 0.06 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in children (P < 0.001).     

High-dose Remifentanil Does Not Impair Cerebrovascular Carbon Dioxide Reactivity in Healthy Male Volunteers

Background: Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity during high-dose remifentanil infusion was investigated in volunteers by measurement of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and mean CBF velocity (CBFv).

Methods: Ten healthy male volunteers with a laryngeal mask for artificial ventilation received remifentanil at an infusion rate of 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 under normocapnia, hypocapnia, and hypercapnia. Stable xenon-enhanced computed tomography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the left middle cerebral artery were used to assess rCBF and mean CBFv, respectively. If required, blood pressure was maintained within baseline values with intravenous phenylephrine to avoid confounding effects of altered hemodynamics.

Results: Hemodynamic parameters were maintained constant over time. Remifentanil infusion at 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 significantly decreased rCBF and mean CBFv. Both rCBF and mean CBFv increased as the arterial carbon dioxide tension increased from hypocapnia to hypercapnia, indicating that cerebrovascular reactivity remained intact. The average slopes of rCBF reactivity were 0.56 +/- 0.27 and 0.49 +/- 0.28 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for 2 and 4 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 remifentanil, respectively (relative change in percent/mmHg: 1.9 +/- 0.8 and 1.6 +/- 0.5, respectively). The average slopes for mean CBFv reactivity were 1.61 +/- 0.95 and 1.54 +/- 0.83 cm [middle dot] s-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil, respectively (relative change in percent/mmHg: 1.86 +/- 0.59 and 1.79 +/- 0.59, respectively). Preanesthesia and postanesthesia values of rCBF and mean CBFv did not differ.     

Local Cerebral Blood Flow, Local Cerebral Glucose Utilization, and Flow-Metabolism Coupling during Sevoflurane versus Isoflurane Anesthesia in Rats

Background: Compared to isoflurane, knowledge of local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) during sevoflurane anesthesia is limited.

Methods: LCGU, LCBF, and their overall means were measured in Sprague-Dawley rats (8 groups, n = 6 each) during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia, 1 and 2 MAC, and in conscious control animals (2 groups, n = 6 each) using the autoradiographic 2-[(14) C]deoxy-D-glucose and 4-iodo-N-methyl-[(14) C]antipyrine methods.

Results: During anesthesia, mean cerebral glucose utilization was decreased: control, 56 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot]-1; 1 MAC isoflurane, 32 +/- 4 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-43%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 37 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-34%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 23 +/- 3 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-58%); 2 MAC sevoflurane, 23 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-59%). Local analysis showed a reduction in LCGU in the majority of the 40 brain regions analyzed. Mean cerebral blood flow was increased as follows: control, 93 +/- 8 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1; 1 MAC isoflurane, 119 +/- 19 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+28%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 104 +/- 15 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+12%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 149 +/- 17 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+60%); 2 MAC sevoflurane, 118 +/- 21 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+27%). LCBF was increased in most brain structures investigated. Correlation coefficients obtained for the relationship between LCGU and LCBF were as follows: control, 0.93; 1 MAC isoflurane, 0.89; 2 MAC isoflurane, 0.71; 1 MAC sevoflurane, 0.83; 2 MAC sevoflurane, 0.59).     

Acute Opioid Tolerance: Intraoperative Remifentanil Increases Postoperative Pain and Morphine Requirement

Background: Rapid development of acute opioid tolerance is well established in animals and is more likely to occur with large doses of short-acting drugs. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that intraoperative remifentanil administration results in acute opioid tolerance that is manifested by increased postoperative pain and opioid requirement.

Methods: Fifty adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to two anesthetic regimens: (1) desflurane was kept constant at 0.5 minimum alveolar concentrations and a remifentanil infusion was titrated to autonomic responses (remifentanil group); or (2) remifentanil at 0.1 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and desflurane titrated to autonomic responses (desflurane group). All patients were given a bolus of 0.15 mg/kg morphine 40 min before the end of surgery. Morphine was initially titrated to need by postanesthesia care nurses blinded to group assignment. Subsequently, patients-who were also blinded to group assignment-controlled their own morphine administration. Pain scores and morphine consumption were recorded for 24 postoperative h.

Results: The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.3 +/- 0.2 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in the remifentanil group, which was significantly greater than in the desflurane group. Intraoperative hemodynamic responses were similar in each group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly greater in the remifentanil group. These patients required morphine significantly earlier than those in the desflurane group and needed nearly twice as much morphine in the first 24 postoperative h: 59 mg (25-75% interquartile range, 43-71) versus 32 mg (25-75% interquartile range, 19-59;P < 0.01).     

Dobutamine Antagonizes Epinephrine's Biochemical and Cardiotonic Effects: Results of an In Vitro Model Using Human Lymphocytes and a Clinical Study in Patients Recovering from Cardiac Surgery

Background: Patients may receive more than one positive inotropic drug to improve myocardial function and cardiac output, with the assumption that the effects of two drugs are additive. The authors hypothesized that combinations of dobutamine and epinephrine would produce additive biochemical and hemodynamic effects.

Methods: The study was performed in two parts. Phase 1 used human lymphocytes in an in vitro model of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) generation in response to dobutamine (10-8 to 10-4 M) or epinephrine (10-9 M to 10-5 M), and dobutamine and epinephrine together. Phase 2 was a clinical study in patients after aortocoronary artery bypass in which isobolographic analysis compared the cardiotonic effects of dobutamine (1.25, 2.5, or 5 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or epinephrine (10, 20, or 40 ng [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1), alone or in combination.

Results: In phase 1, dobutamine increased cAMP production 41%, whereas epinephrine increased cAMP concentration [almost equal to] 200%. However, when epinephrine (10-6 M) and dobutamine were combined, dobutamine reduced cAMP production at concentrations between 10-6 to 10-4 M (P = 0.001). In patients, 1.25 to 5 [micro sing]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 dobutamine increased the cardiac index (CI) 15-28%. Epinephrine also increased the CI with each increase in dose. However, combining epinephrine with the two larger doses of dobutamine (2.5 and 5 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) did not increase the CI beyond that achieved with epinephrine and the lowest dose of dobutamine (1.25 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot]-1 min (-1)). In addition, the isobolographic analysis for equieffective concentrations of dobutamine and epinephrine suggests subadditive effects.     

Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Administration Reduces Propofol Infusion Requirements during Maintenance of Propofol-N2O Anesthesia: Part I: Comparing Propofol Requirements According to Hemodynamic Responses: Part II: Comparing Bispectral Index in Control and Magnesium Groups

Background: The authors investigated whether an intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate reduces propofol infusion requirements during maintenance of propofol-N2O anesthesia.

Methods: Part I study: 54 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups (n = 27 per group). The patients in the control group received 0.9% sodium chloride solution, whereas the patients in the magnesium group received magnesium (50 mg/kg as a bolus, then 8 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1). To maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at baseline value, the propofol infusion rate was changed when the MAP or the HR changed. The amount of propofol infused excluding the bolus dosage was divided by patient's body weight and total infusion time. Part II study: Another 20 patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 per group). When the MAP and HR had been maintained at baseline value and the propofol infusion rate had been maintained at 80 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 (magnesium group) and 160 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 (control group), bispectral index (BIS) values were measured.

Results: Part I: The mean propofol infusion rate in the magnesium group (81.81 +/- 13.09 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was significantly less than in the control group (167.57 +/- 47.27). Part II: BIS values in the control group (40.70 +/- 3.89) were significantly less than those in the magnesium group (57.80 +/- 7.32).     

Effects of Propofol and Remifentanil on Phrenic Nerve Activity and Nociceptive Cardiovascular Responses in Rabbits

Background: The effects of propofol, remifentanil, and their combination on phrenic nerve activity (PNA), resting heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and nociceptive cardiovascular responses were studied in rabbits.

Methods: Basal anesthesia and constant blood gas tensions were maintained with [alpha]-chloralose and mechanical ventilation. PNA, HR, MAP, and maximum changes in HR and MAP ([DELTA]HR, [DELTA]MAP) evoked by electrical nerve stimulation of tibial nerves were recorded. The comparative effects were observed for propofol at infusion rates from 0.05 to 3.2 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 (group I) and remifentanil from 0.0125 to 12.8 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 alone (group II), and during constant infusions of propofol at rates of 0.1 and 0.8 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 (groups III and IV, respectively). Finally, the effect of remifentanil on propofol blood levels was observed (group V).

Results: The infusion rates for 50% depression (ED50) of PNA, [DELTA]HR, and [DELTA]MAP were 0.41, 1.32, and 1.58 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 for propofol, and 0.115, 0.125, and 1.090 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 for remifentanil, respectively. The ratios for the ED50 values of [DELTA]HR and [DELTA]MAP to PNA were 3.2 and 3.9 for propofol, and 1.1 and 9.5 for remifentanil, respectively. Analysis of the expected and observed responses and isobologrms showed that although their combined effects on PNA, resting HR, and MAP, and [DELTA]MAP were synergistic for [DELTA]HR, they were merely additive. Remifentanil had no effect on propofol blood levels.     

Dose-Response Relationship and Infusion Requirement of Cisatracurium Besylate in Infants and Children during Nitrous Oxide-Narcotic Anesthesia

Background: To determine the effect of age on the dose-response relation and infusion requirement of cisatracurium besylate in pediatric patients, 32 infants (mean age, 0.7 yr; range, 0.3-1.0 yr) and 32 children (mean age, 4.9 yr; range, 3.1-9.6 yr) were studied during thiopentone-nitrous oxide-oxygen-narcotic anesthesia.

Methods: Potency was determined using a single-dose (20, 26, 33, or 40 [mu]g/kg) technique. Neuromuscular block was assessed by monitoring the electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis to supramaximal train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 2 Hz.

Results: Least-squares linear regression analysis of the log-probit transformation of dose and maximal response yielded median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) values for infants (29 +/- 3 [mu]g/kg and 43 +/- 9 [mu]g/kg, respectively) that were similar to those for children (29 +/- 2 [mu]g/kg and 47 +/- 7 [mu]g/kg, respectively). The mean infusion rate necessary to maintain 90-99% neuromuscular block during the first hour in infants (1.9 +/- 0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1; range: 1.3-2.5 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was similar to that in children (2.0 +/- 0.5 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1; range: 1.3-2.9 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1).     

Sex Differences in Morphine-induced Ventilatory Depression Reside within the Peripheral Chemoreflex Loop

Background: This study gathers information in humans on the sites of sex-related differences in ventilatory depression caused by the [micro sign]-opioid receptor agonist morphine.

Methods: Experiments were performed in healthy young men (n = 9) and women (n = 7). Dynamic ventilatory responses to square-wave changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (7.5-15 mmHg) and step decreases in end-tidal oxygen tension (step from 110 to 50 mmHg, duration of hypoxia 15 min) were obtained before and during morphine infusion (intravenous bolus dose 100 [micro sign]g/kg, followed by 30 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1). Each hypercapnic response was separated into a fast peripheral and slow central component, which yield central (Gc) and peripheral (Gp) carbon dioxide sensitivities. Values are mean +/- SD.

Results: In carbon dioxide studies in men, morphine reduced Gc from 1.61 +/- 0.33 to 1.23 +/- 0.12 l [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05) without affecting Gp (control, 0.41 +/- 0.16 and morphine, 0.49 +/- 0.12 l [middle dot] [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1, not significant). In carbon dioxide studies in women, morphine reduced Gc, from 1.51 +/- 0.74 to 1.17 +/- 0.52 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05), and Gp, from 0.54 +/- 0.19 to 0.39 +/- 0.22 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05). Morphine-induced changes in Gc were equal in men and women; changes in Gp were greater in women. In hypoxic studies, morphine depressed the hyperventilatory response at the initiation of hypoxia more in women than in men (0.54 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.34 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] %-1, respectively; P < 0.05). The ventilatory response to sustained hypoxia (i.e., 15 min) did not differ between men and women.     

Remifentanil versus Morphine Analgesia and Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Double Blind Study

Background: The rapid onset and offset of action of remifentanil could make it quickly adjustable to the required level of sedation in critically ill patients. The authors hypothesized that the efficacy of a remifentanil-based regimen was greater than that of a morphine-based regimen.

Methods: Forty intent-to-treat patients were randomly allocated to receive a blinded infusion of either remifentanil 0.15 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 or morphine 0.75 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1. The opioid infusion was titrated, in the first intent, to achieve optimal sedation defined as Sedation Agitation scale of 4. A midazolam open-label infusion was started if additional sedation was required.

Results: The mean percentage hours of optimal sedation was significantly longer in the remifentanil group (78.3 +/- 6.2) than in the morphine group (66.5 +/- 8.5). This was achieved with less frequent infusion rate adjustments (0.34 +/- 0.25 changes/h) than in the morphine group (0.42 +/- 0.22 changes/h). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and extubation time were significantly longer in the morphine group (18.1 +/- 3.4 h, 73 +/- 7 min) than in the remifentanil group (14.1 +/- 2.8 h, 17 +/- 6 min), respectively. Remifentanil mean infusion rate was 0.13 +/- 0.03 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1, whereas morphine mean infusion rate was 0.68 +/- 0.28 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1. More subjects in the morphine group (9 of 20) than in the remifentanil group (6 of 20) required midazolam. The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable across the two treatment groups.     

Sevoflurane Increases Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Normocapnic Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy

Background: The data on the effect of sevoflurane on intracranial pressure in humans are still limited and inconclusive. The authors hypothesized that sevoflurane would increase intracranial pressure as compared to propofol.

Methods: In 20 patients with no evidence of mass effect undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, anesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl and propofol and maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a continuous propofol infusion, 100 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1. The authors assigned patients to two groups randomized to receive only continued propofol infusion (n = 10) or sevoflurane (n = 10) for 20 min. During the 20-min study period, each patient in the sevoflurane group received, in random order, two concentrations (0.5 times the minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] and 1.0 MAC end-tidal) of sevoflurane for 10 min each. The authors continuously monitored lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and anesthetic concentrations.

Results: Lumbar CSF pressure increased by 2 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SD) with both 0.5 MAC and 1 MAC of sevoflurane. Cerebral perfusion pressure decreased by 11 +/- 5 mmHg with 0.5 MAC and by 15 +/- 4 mmHg with 1.0 MAC of sevoflurane. Systolic blood pressure decreased with both concentrations of sevoflurane. To maintain blood pressure within predetermined limits (within +/- 20% of baseline value), phenylephrine was administered to 5 of 10 patients in the sevoflurane group (range = 50-300 [micro sign]g) and no patients in the propofol group. Lumbar CSF pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and systolic blood pressure did not change in the propofol group.     

Remifentanil-induced Postoperative Hyperalgesia and Its Prevention with Small-dose Ketamine

Background: Remifentanil-induced secondary hyperalgesia has been documented experimentally in both animals and healthy human volunteers, but never clinically. This study tested the hypotheses that increased pain sensitivity assessed by periincisional allodynia and hyperalgesia can occur after relatively large-dose intraoperative remifentanil and that small-dose ketamine prevents this hyperalgesia.

Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive (1) intraoperative remifentanil at 0.05 [mu]g [middle dot]kg-1 [middle dot]min-1 (small-dose remifentanil); (2) intraoperative remifentanil at 0.40 [mu]g [middle dot]kg-1 [middle dot]min-1 (large-dose remifentanil); or (3) intraoperative remifentanil at 0.40 [mu]g [middle dot]kg-1 [middle dot]min-1 and 0.5 mg/kg ketamine just after the induction, followed by an intraoperative infusion of 5 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 until skin closure and then 2 [mu]g [middle dot]kg-1 [middle dot]min-1 for 48 h (large-dose remifentanil-ketamine). Pain scores and morphine consumption were recorded for 48 postoperative hours. Quantitative sensory tests, peak expiratory flow measures, and cognitive tests were performed at 24 and 48 h.

Results: Hyperalgesia to von Frey hair stimulation adjacent to the surgical wound and morphine requirements were larger (P < 0.05) and allodynia to von Frey hair stimulation was greater (P < 0.01) in the large-dose remifentanil group compared with the other two groups, which were comparable. There were no significant differences in pain, pressure pain detection threshold with an algometer, peak flow, cognitive tests, or side effects.     

Remifentanil Induces Systemic Arterial Vasodilation in Humans with a Total Artificial Heart

Background: To assess intrinsic vascular effects of remifentanil, increased concentrations were infused in critically ill patients with a total artificial heart.

Methods: In the early postoperative period after implantation of a total artificial heart, nine ventilated patients requiring short general anesthesia were included in this study. After anesthesia was induced with 0.3 mg/kg intravenous etomidate, the artificial heart settings were modified to render cardiac output "preload-independent." While maintenance of anesthesia was ensured by a continuous infusion of etomidate, increased concentrations of remifentanil (from 0.1 to 1 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) were infused in steps of 5 min under hemodynamic monitoring, including left and right atrial pressures, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, and left and right cardiac indices. The invasive procedure was started under the highest concentration of remifentanil tolerated by the patient. Infusion of remifentanil was stopped at the end of the invasive procedure, while etomidate infusion was maintained. New hemodynamic measurements were performed at the end of the 12-min recovery period.

Results: Remifentanil produced a dose-dependent and significant decrease in systemic arterial pressure and vascular resistances (n = 9) from a concentration of 0.25 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1. No significant changes were observed on pulmonary vascular resistances (n = 6). Neither right (n = 9) nor left (n = 6) atrial pressures were affected by remifentanil infusion. Hemodynamic variables returned to baseline value over the 12-min recovery period.