Anorectal function in the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

The anorectal function of nine patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) (5 F: 4 M, median age, 27 (range, 19–41 years) and nine control subjects (5 F: 4 M, median age, 47 (35–66)P<0.01) has been investigated by a new technique that radiologically visualizes the anorectum during voiding of a semisolid contrast medium, while simultaneously measuring intrarectal pressure and anal sphincter EMG activity. A degree of rectal prolapse was demonstrated in eight of the SRUS patients; six of these lesions were clinically occult. Abnormal failure of the anal sphincter to relax on voiding was present in seven of the SRUS patients. These abnormalities resulted in the SRUS patients requiring a greater increase in intrarectal pressure (median, 100 cm water) to void than the control subjects (median, 65 cm water,P<0.01). This combination of high intrarectal pressure and rectal prolapse during straining seems to be the cause of SRUS This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council.     

Anorectal ergotism: another cause of solitary rectal ulcers

Anorectal ulceration was observed in 6 patients who excessively used suppositories containing ergotamine tartrate. The mucosal lesions of the rectum resembled those observed in the "solitary rectal ulcer syndrome." However, characteristic features of ergotamine-induced ulcers are absence of a mucosal prolapse, lack of a history of constipation, and rapid healing after discontinuation of the drug. Furthermore, the rectal lesion may be associated with anal ulceration, which occasionally presents as the only clinical manifestation of "anorectal ergotism."     

Anorectal Physiology in Solitary Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-Matched Series

PURPOSE Solitary ulcer syndrome is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and chronic ulcer of the rectal wall in patients suffering from outlet constipation. Despite similar surgical options (rectopexy, anterior resection), solitary ulcer syndrome may differ from overt rectal prolapse with regard to symptoms and pathogenesis. The present work analyzed differences between these conditions in a case-control physiology study. METHODS From 1997 to 2002, 931 consecutive subjects were investigated in a single physiology unit for anorectal functional disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal physiology, and evacuation proctography were included in a prospective database. Diagnosis of solitary ulcer syndrome was based on both symptoms and anatomic features in 25 subjects with no overt rectal prolapse (21 females and 4 males; mean age, 37.2 ± 15.7 years) and no past history of anorectal surgery. They were compared with age-matched and gender-matched subjects: 25 with outlet constipation (also matched on degree of internal procidentia), 25 with overt rectal prolapse without any mucosal change, and 14 with overt rectal prolapse and mucosal changes. RESULTS Subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome reported symptomatic levels (digitations, pain, incontinence) similar to those of patients with outlet constipation, but they had significantly more constipation and less incontinence than patients with overt rectal prolapse. Compared with each of the three control groups (dyschezia, rectal prolapse without mucosal change, and rectal prolapse with mucosal change), subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome more frequently had an increasing anal pressure at strain (15 vs. 5, 3, and 1, respectively ; P < 0.01) and a paradoxical puborectalis contraction (15 vs. 9, 1, and 1, respectively; P < 0.05). With respect to evacuating proctography, complete rectal emptying was achieved less frequently in this group (5 vs. 12, 23, and 10, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients with overt rectal prolapse, mean resting and squeezing anal pressures were significantly higher in both groups of subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome and with outlet constipation. Prevalence and levels of anatomic disorders (perineal descent, rectocele) did not differ among the four groups except for rectal prolapse grade and prevalence of enterocele (higher in overt rectal prolapse group). Interestingly, and despite matched controls for degree of intussusception, individuals with solitary ulcer syndrome had circular internal procidentia more often compared with those suffering from outlet constipation without mucosal lesions (15 vs. 8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION This case-controlled study quantifies functional anal disorders in patients suffering from solitary ulcer syndrome. Despite no proven etiologic factor, sphincter-obstructed defecation and circular internal procidentia both may play an important part in the pathogenesis and an exclusive surgical approach may not be appropriate in this context. Presented at the meeting of the American Gastroenterology Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 18, 2004.     

Proktitis aus Sicht der Proktologie*

Proctitis may cause anal bleeding, anal mucus secretion, diarrhea, urge incontinence, pain at defecation, etc. At digital rectal examination a thickened mucosal lining may be palpated and blood is found on the examination glove. At endoscopy erosive or ulcerative lesions are found that bleed easily on contact. Also polyp-like or even tumor-like lesions, telangiectasias and atypical fistulas can be seen. The symptoms and the findings on examination are quite often unspecific; a detailed history of the patient is most important in the work-up for the differential diagnosis. Serological and microbiological examinations should be done as well as biopsies (except for radiation proctitis). Proctitis may occur after applying external agents that cause chemical, thermal as well as pharmaceutical reactions in the rectum. Proctitis may occur after fecal diversion. Ischemic proctitis causes severe pain and fecal incontinence and may occur postoperatively, after shock/anaphylaxis, etc. The solitary rectal ulcer (syndrome) has a more or less mechanical etiology and shows clearly defined pathohistological lesions. It often occurs in women with outlet obstruction and/or rectal, mucosal or hemorrhoidal prolapse. Except for rectal prolapse, treatment of the solitary rectal ulcer is not always simple or successful. The same applies to radiation proctitis that may occur after radiotherapy. Radiated anorectal tissue regenerates slowly or not at all. Therefore invasive procedures should not be performed because of the high risk for the development of ulceration or fistula. Treatment of radiation proctitis is not always simple and it does not have a high level of evidence. In most cases therapy should be performed individually, according to the severity of complaints.     

Anal Sphincter Morphology in Patients With Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the morphologic change of the anal canal in patients with rectal prolapse. METHODS: The endoanal ultrasound scans of 18 patients with rectal prolapse were compared with those of 23 asymptomatic controls. The thickness and area of the internal anal sphincter and submucosa were measured at three levels. RESULTS: Qualitatively, patients with rectal prolapse showed a characteristic elliptical morphology in the anal canal with anterior/posterior submucosal distortion accounting for most of the change. Quantitatively, internal anal sphincter (IAS) and submucosa (SM) thicknesses and area were greater in all quadrants of the anal canal (especially upper) in patients with rectal prolapse compared with controls. There was statistical evidence (in a regression model) of a relationship between increases in all measured variables and the finding of rectal prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of sphincter distortion in rectal prolapse is unknown but may be a response to increased mechanical stress placed on the sphincter from the prolapse or an abnormal response by the sphincter complex to the prolapse. Patients found to have this feature on endoanal ultrasound should undergo clinical examination and defecography to look for rectal wall abnormalities.     

Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND--The aetiology and pathology of rectal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer are poorly understood. AIMS--To examine the full thickness rectal wall in these two conditions. METHODS--The pathological abnormalities in the surgically resected rectal wall were studied from nine patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, 11 complete rectal prolapse, and nine cancer controls. Routine haematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson staining for collagen were performed. RESULTS--The rectal wall from solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens was thickened compared with complete rectal prolapse and controls. The major difference was in the muscularis propria (2.2 v 1.1 v 1.2 mm, medians, p < 0.005) and particularly the inner circular muscular layer, and to a lesser extent the submucosal and outer longitudinal muscular layers. Some solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens showed unique features such as decussation of the two muscular layers (four of nine), nodular induration of inner circular layer (four of nine) and grouping of outer longitudinal layer into bundles (three of nine); these were not seen in complete rectal prolapse or control specimens. CONCLUSIONS--These features, which resemble the features of high pressure sphincter tissue, may be of aetiological importance, and suggest a different pathogenesis for these two disorders. Excess collagen was seen in both disorders, was more severe in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens, and probably reflects a response to repeated trauma.     

Barium enema and defaecography in the diagnosis and evaluation of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Forty-three patients with histologically proven solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum were examined by defaecography and 33 by barium enema. Barium enema showed changes in the rectum in all cases. Thickening of the rectal folds and spasm were most common, followed by ulceration and pseudopolypoid change. None of these changes is individually pathognomonic of the solitary ulcer syndrome, but viewed in conjunction they are highly suggestive of the condition. During defaecography, intussusception of the rectum was observed in 34 cases (79%). In 19 (44%) a complete external prolapse was present while intra-anal and intra-rectal intussusception was found in 15 (35%). Intussusception arose in most cases from the mid-rectum, and rarely from a rectal mucosal prolapse of the ampulla. Awareness of the abnormalities of the solitary ulcer syndrome on barium enema enables the radiologist to suggest the diagnosis and recommend defaecography to establish the functional disorder, which may help determine the appropriate medical or surgical treatment.     

Preservation of faecal continence during rises in intra-abdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap valve?

Studies were carried out in 15 normal subjects and 14 patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence to test whether a rectoanal flap valve could be responsible for maintaining faecal continence in man. Intraluminal pressures were recorded from the rectum and from three sites in the anal canal during serial increases in intra-abdominal pressure, produced by forced expiration into a sphygmomanometer keeping the height of the column of mercury at prescribed levels. The anal pressures in the normal volunteers always remained higher than the intrarectal pressures even when these were as high as 230 cm H2O. This pressure gradient was the reverse of that which would be found if an anterior rectal flap valve maintained continence and suggests instead that continence is normally maintained by a reflex contraction of the external anal sphincter. The anal pressures in patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence, however, fell below the rectal pressure as the intra-abdominal pressure increased, creating the conditions for a flap valve. The valve was incompetent, however, because fluid infused into the rectum leaked from the anus whenever the rectal pressure exceeded the anal pressure.     

A rare case of rectal prolapse associated with rectal adenocarcinoma: case report.

Despite the fact that colorectal polyps and solitary rectal ulcers may be present in conjunction with rectal prolapse, association between rectal prolapse and rectal cancer is very rare. As far as we could determine, there are only a few articles concerning rectal cancer in association with rectal prolapse in the literature. This case, a 63-year-old female patient, had suffered from a rectal prolapse since childhood and presented as a case of rectal cancer. At presentation, she complained of constipation and rectal bleeding for the previous six months. At physical examination there was a relaxed anal sphincter and a large reddish mass protruding via the anal canal when the patient strained. There was a fungating lesion in the upper left part of the rectal mucosa. An incisional biopsy was performed, the histopathological result of which was adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Changes in bowel habits, chronic constipation and chronic irritation seen in rectal prolapse may be responsible for the development of rectal cancer. Thus, a detailed history, digital rectal examination and rectosigmoidoscopic examination are important, particularly in patients with long-term rectal prolapse.     

Influence of rectal prolapse on the asymmetry of the anal sphincter in patients with anal incontinence

Background  

Anal sphincter defects have been shown to increase pressure asymmetry within the anal canal in patients with fecal incontinence. However, this correlation is far from perfect, and other factors may play a role. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of rectal prolapse on anal pressure asymmetry in patients with anal incontinence.     

Intrarectal pressures and balloon expulsion related to evacuation proctography.

Seventy four patients with constipation were examined by standard evacuation proctography and then attempted to expel a small, non-deformable rectal balloon, connected to a pressure transducer to measure intrarectal pressure. Simultaneous imaging related the intrarectal position of the balloon to rectal deformity. Inability to expel the balloon was associated proctographically with prolonged evacuation, incomplete evacuation, reduced anal canal diameter, and acute anorectal angulation during evacuation. The presence and size of rectocoele or intussusception was unrelated to voiding of paste or balloon. An independent linear combination of pelvic floor descent and evacuation time on proctography correctly predicted maximum intrarectal pressure in 74% of cases. No patient with both prolonged evacuation and reduced pelvic floor descent on proctography could void the balloon, as maximum intrarectal pressure was reduced in this group. A prolonged evacuation time on proctography, in combination with reduced pelvic floor descent, suggests defecatory disorder may be caused by inability to raise intrarectal pressure. A diagnosis of anismus should not be made on proctography solely on the basis of incomplete/prolonged evacuation, as this may simply reflect inadequate straining.     

Solitary rectal ulcer and complete rectal prolapse: one condition or two?

We studied the physiological features of patients with complete rectal prolapse and different degrees of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome to determine whether these conditions are likely to form part of the same disorder. 52 solitary rectal ulcer patients (median age 31, 40 females), and 15 complete rectal prolapse patients (median age 31, 12 females) were studied. Solitary rectal ulcer patients were divided into 3 groups, based on the extent of accompanying rectal prolapse (no prolapse, internal prolapse, or external prolapse). Both solitary rectal ulcer patients without prolapse and with internal prolapse had significantly higher maximum anal resting (p<0.01 for both groups) and squeeze pressure (p<0.05 for both groups) than complete rectal prolapse patients. In contrast, solitary rectal ulcer patients having external prolapse were similar to those with complete rectal prolapse. Solitary rectal ulcer patients without rectal prolapse had significantly decreased anal and rectal electrosensitivity (p<0.01 for both) when compared to healthy control subjects. Solitary rectal ulcer patients therefore have a spectrum of clinical and physiological features — this condition may comprise a range of different disease entities. The findings also suggest a different underlying aetiopathophysiology of solitary rectal ulcer from that of complete rectal prolapse.

---

Résumé Nous avons étudié les données physiologiques de patients présentant un prolapsus rectal complet et différents degrés du syndrome d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum afin de déterminer si ces conditions constituent des composantes d'un même trouble. Cinquante-deux patients porteurs d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum (médiane 31 ans, 40 femmes) et 15 prolapsus complets du rectum (âge médian 31; 12 femmes) ont été étudiés. Les ulcères solitaires du rectum ont été répartis en 3 groupes selon l'extension du prolapsus rectal (pas de prolapsus, prolapsus interne, prolapsus extériorié). Les patients porteurs d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum sans prolapsus et ceux porteurs d'un prolapsus interne ont une pression anale de repos maximale élevée de manière significative (P<0.001 dans les deux groupes) et une pression de rétention (P<0.005) dans les deux groupes ainsi qu'un canal anal plus long (P<0.005 dans les deux groupes comparativement aux patients porteurs d'un prolapsus rectal complet). A l'inverse, les patients porteurs d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum accompagné d'un prolapsus externe présentaient des valeurs similaires à celles observées en cas de prolapsus rectal complet. Les patients porteurs d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum sans prolapsus ont une diminution significative de l'électrosensitivité anale et rectale (P<0.001 dans les deux groupes) en comparaison à des sujets sains. Les patients porteurs d'un ulcère solitaire du rectum ont donc un large spectre d'anomalies cliniques et physiologiques pouvant comprendre un nombre très varié d'entités pathologiques différentes. Ces constatations suggèrent une étiopathophysiologie différente en cas d'ulcère solitaire du rectum qu'en cas de prolapsus rectal complet.

     

A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment

The management of rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RIMP) is not based on an accepted classification of the lesion which helps to choose the appropriate treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to report a new endoscopic grading of RIMP and to evaluate its clinical value. Thirty-two patients (7 men, 25 women; mean age 56 years, range 28–72) affected by symptomatic RIMP were prospectively classified as follows: RIMP was defined as first degree when detectable below the anorectal ring on straining, as second degree when it reached the dentate line, and as third degree when it reached the anal verge. Anal manometry was carried out in 26 patients, and anal ultrasound and defecography in 6 prior to surgery. A correlation was found between the occurrence and severity of symptoms and the degree of the prolapse as obstructed defecation, bleeding and fecal soiling affected mainly patients with third-degree RIMP. At manometry the maximal resting tone was 60±23 mmHg and voluntary contraction 96±41 mmHg (mean±SEM). At anal ultrasound the mean internal sphincter thickness was 2.1±0.2 mm, and external sphincter thickness was 7.0±0.8 mm. A significant rectocele and rectal intussusception (n=2) and a nonrelaxing puborectalis muscle on straining (n=2) were observed at defecography in cases with third-degree RIMP. The anorectal angle was 100±75° at rest, 63±20° on squeezing, and 115±9° on straining. A conservative treatment with high-fiber diet and/or rubber band ligation was carried out in all cases of first and in most patients with second-degree RIMP (n=26). Those who required surgery, i.e., stapled transanal excision of the prolapse (n=6), had either severely symptomatic third-degree RIMP with solitary ulcer syndrome (n=4) or second-degree RIMP (n=2). A positive outcome was achieved in 71% of cases. The proposed classification evaluated by the present study may be of clinical value in managing rectal internal mucosal prolapse. Accepted: 18 June 1999     

A case of rectal cancer arising from long-standing prolapsed mucosa of the rectum

Mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS) has been recognized as a chronic benign inflammatory disorder, characterized mainly by rectal mucosal prolapse. Disorders representing this condition include solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), rectal prolapse, proctitis cystica profunda, and inflammatory cap polyps. The gross appearance of rectal MPS can be occasionally misinterpreted as rectal cancer. In contrast, there have been a few reports of colorectal cancer originating from prolapsed mucosa. Herein, we report a case of MPS associated with two independent rectal cancers extending into the submucosal layer. We speculate that long-standing MPS may increase the risk of malignant transformation.     

Anal sensitivity test: What does it measure and do we need it?

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the anal sensitivity in controls and in different patient groups and to establish factors that determine anal sensitivity. METHODS: Anorectal function tests were performed in 387 patients with different anorectal diseases. Anal sensitivity was measured in 36 controls. Anal sensitivity was measured by means of mucosal electrosensitivity (MES) using a catheter with two electrodes placed in the anal canal. A constant current (square wave stimuli 100 μsec, pulses per second) was increased stepwise from 1 to 20 mAmp until the threshold sensation was reached. Other tests used were anal manometry (maximum basal pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, rectal compliance (maximum rectal volume and pressure), endosonography (submucosal thickness), defects and thickness of internal and external sphincter), electromyography (maximum contraction pattern, Grade 1 (solitary contractions) to Grade 4 (interference pattern)), and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Multiple regression analysis was performed. It was postulated that age, local conditions (anal scars, anal fissures, hemorrhoids, mucosal prolapse, proctitis, sphincter thickness and defects, and submucosal thickness), and neurologic factors could influence anal sensitivity. RESULTS: Controls had an MES of 3.4±1.7. MES was significantly increased compared with controls in patients with fecal incontinence, soiling, hemorrhoids, mucosal prolapse, constipation, anal scars, anal surgery, and sphincter defects; patients with fecal incontinence had the highest MES (6.7±4.3;P <0.0001). Patients with anal fissures and proctitis showed no differences compared with controls. MES correlated significantly with age (R =0.29), maximum basal pressure (R =?0.29), maximum squeeze pressure (R =?0.32), submucosal thickness (R =0.19), maximum contraction pattern (R =?0.39), single-fiber electromyography (R =0.39), and maximum rectal volume and pressure (0.14). Multiple regression analysis showed that age, internal sphincter defects, and submucosal thickness significantly influenced anal sensitivity, but explained only 10 percent of the variance. CONCLUSION: Anal sensitivity is diminished in all patients with anorectal diseases except for anal fissures and proctitis. There are correlations with other anorectal function tests. Anal sensitivity is determined for 10 percent by age, internal sphincter defects, and thickness of the submucosa. Anal sensitivity measurement, therefore, has limited clinical value and should be used in conjunction with other tests in a research setting.     

Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse.

Biopsies of the external anal sphincter, puborectalis, and levator ani muscles have been examined in 24 women and one man with long-standing anorectal incontinence, 18 of whom also had rectal prolapse, and in two men with rectal prolapse alone. In 16 of the women anorectal incontinence was of unknown cause, but in eight there was a history of difficult labour. Similar biopsies were examined in six control subjects. In all the incontinent patients there was histological evidence of denervation, which was most prominent in the external anal sphincter muscle biopsies, and least prominent in the levator ani muscles. Myopathic features, which were thought to be secondary, were present in the more abnormal biopsies. There were severe histological abnormalities in small nerves supplying the external anal sphincter muscle in the three cases in which material was available for study. We suggest that idiopathic anorectal incontinence may be the result of denervation of the muscles of the anorectal sling, and of the anal sphincter mechanism. This could result from entrapment or stretch injury of the pudendal or perineal nerves occurring as a consequence of rectal descent induced during repeated defaecation straining, or from injuries to these nerves associated with childbirth.     

Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment

Forty-five patients with soiling but without faecal incontinence were evaluated by means of anorectal function investigations (anal manometry, rectal capacity and saline infusion test). The causes of soiling and the effect of treatment on both soiling and anorectal function were studied. The results were compared with a control group of 161 patients without soiling or incontinence. The diagnoses were haemorrhoids (10), mucosal prolapse (7), rectal prolapse (6), fistulae (5), proctitis (3), faecal impaction (2), rectocele with intussusception (2), scars after fistulectomy (2) and others (8). Simple inspection and proctoscopy were generally sufficient to establish a diagnosis. For two patients the diagnosis rectocele was made after defaecography. Anorectal test results did not differ between the soiling and control group, did not contribute to establish a diagnosis and did not change after treatment. Only patients with a rectal prolapse had abnormal results in anorectal function tests: a low basal sphincter pressure and a limited continence reserve. Appropriate therapy resulted in complete recovery (44%) or improvement of symptoms (29%).     

Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal canal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.     

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children

SRUS is a rare condition in children, which usually presents with a symptom complex of rectal bleeding, passage of mucus and straining on defecation, tenesmus, perineal and abdominal pain, sensation of incomplete defecation, constipation and rectal prolapse. The underlying etiology of SRUS is not fully understood but it is likely to be secondary to ischemic changes in the rectum associated with paradoxical contraction of pelvic floor and external anal sphincter muscles and rectal prolapse. Conservative measures like high intake of fluids and fibers, laxatives, biofeedback and behavior modification therapy may be beneficial for treatment of constipation. Excision of rectal ulcer and surgery of overt rectal prolapse, however, may be required in refractory cases not responding to conservative treatments. A therapeutic role for botulinum toxin injection into the external anal sphincter for treatment of SRUS associated with constipation and paradoxical contraction of pelvic floor and external anal sphincter muscles in children, may exist.     

Anorectal dysfunction and rectal prolapse in progressive systemic sclerosis

Our aim was to characterize the clinical spectrum of anorectal dysfunction among eight patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) who presented with altered bowel movements with or without fecal incontinence. The anorectum was assessed by physical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, and anorectal manometry. There was concomitant involvement of the other regions of the digestive tract in all patients as determined by barium studies, endoscopy, or manometry: eight esophageal, three gastric, four small bowel, and two colonic. Seven patients had fecal incontinence, and four also had second-degree complete rectal prolapse. Abnormal anorectal function, particularly abnormal anal sphincter resting pressures, were detected in all patients; anal sphincter pressures were lower in those with rectal prolapse. Rectal capacity and wall compliance were impaired in seven of seven patients. Successful surgical correction of prolapse in three patients resulted in restoration of incontinence for six months and seven years in two of the three patients. We conclude that rectal dysfunction and weakness of the anal sphincters are important factors contributing, respectively, to altered bowel movements and fecal incontinence in patients with gastrointestinal involvement by PSS. Rectal prolapse worsens anal sphincter dysfunction and should be sought routinely as it is a treatable factor aggravating fecal incontinence in patients with PSS.This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1992, and appears in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1992;102:A473.Supported in part by the General Clinical Research Center Grant 00585 from the National Institutes of Health.