Determination of medical device-related pressure injury in COVID-19 patients: A prospective descriptive study

BackgroundCOVID-19 patients are at risk for the development of pressure injuries (PI).AimThe aim of this study was to determine the incidence of medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in patients treated in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)s.MethodsThe sample of the study consisted of 132 patients, and each with a maximum follow-up of 7 days. Data were collected in the COVID-19 ICU of a university hospital between January and May 2021 by using a Patient Characteristics Form, the MDRPI Follow-up Form, the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale, and the Pressure Ulcer Staging Form.ResultsOf the patients, 59.1% (n = 78) developed at least one MDRPI. MRDPI was observed in those with a mean age of 65.45 ± 2.462 years who were invasively ventilated (51.3%), enterally fed (46.2%), placed in the prone position (78.2%), and had a Braden score ≤12 (50%). The most common medical devices that caused MDRPIs included endotracheal tube (ET) (31.2% n = 44), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIVM) (23.4% n = 33), nasal high-flow (11.3% n = 16), nasogastric tube (10.6% n = 15), the ET connection (8.5% n = 12), respectively. The most common sites for pressure injuries were the nose (28.8% n = 34), mouth (25.8% n = 34), ear (12.9% n = 17), lip (9.1% n = 12), and cheek (8.3% n = 11). The most common gradings of MDRPIs were stage 2 (28.8% n = 38), stage 1 (19.7% n = 26), stage 3 (9.1% n = 12) mucous membrane injuries (12.9% n = 17) and suspected deep tissue injuries (9.1% n = 12), respectively. The time to PI was 3 days (25.7% n = 36).ConclusionsMDRPI was common among COVID-19 patients. It was found that the most common cause of pressure injury was ventilators, and PI developed in the mouth and lip sites most frequently in patients in prone position, stage 2 and suspected deep tissue damage was the most common grade. It is important to evaluate the skin in contact with medical devices in COVID-19 patients and to take the necessary interventions to prevent PI.     

Irritant contact dermatitis in healthcare workers as a result of the COVID‐19 pandemic: a cross‐sectional study

COVID‐19 healthcare workers (HCWs) require frequent handwashing and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent infection. However, evidence is emerging that these practices are causing adverse effects on their skin integrity. A single‐centre, cross‐sectional study of HCWs from an Irish hospital was undertaken to evaluate the degree of COVID‐19‐related irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) between April and May 2020. Of 270 participants surveyed, 223 (82.6%) reported symptoms of ICD. The hands were the most commonly affected site (76.47%) and the most frequently reported symptom was dry skin (75.37%). Nearly all (268; 99.26%) HCWs had increased hand‐washing frequency, but 122 (45.35%) did not use emollients. In the ICD group, 24.7% cited a history of dermatitis compared with 4.3% of unaffected staff (P < 0.001). The ICD group recorded PPE usage for an average of 3.15 h compared with the non‐ICD group at 1.97 h (P = 0.21). Promoting awareness of COVID‐19‐related ICD is vital to highlight prevention and treatment for frontline staff.     

Root cause analysis to identify contributing factors for the development of hospital acquired pressure injuries

IntroductionMany hospital settings are adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards pressure injury (PI) development; this requires good planning and the implementation of care, as the incidence of PIs reflects the quality of care given in a hospital or facility.AimTo identify common contributing factors towards the development of PIs in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital and improve patient safety through the reduction of hospital-acquired PIs.MethodThis was done using root cause analysis (RCA). All patients who developed a Stage 3 or 4 deep tissue injuries or unstageable hospital-acquired PI between December 2017 and April 2018 PIs were investigated using RCA. The RCA was facilitated through the use of a contributing framework developed by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel which guides investigations of different areas of care. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from several sources and placed in a timeline to reconstruct the series of events. The investigator then identified if the PI was avoidable or not by comparing the evidence with pre-set criteria. Content analysis was further used to analyse the themes retrieved.ResultsA variety of root causes were common amongst all the cases. These included both flaws in the system, such as poor equipment and inadequate educational programmes, as well as human factors such as a lack of basic routine care. No skin assessment was being performed (n = 0) apart from the assessment done on admission. Documentation of action planning when it comes to PI prevention was also missing (n = 0). It was identified that 7 patients were mobilized on admission while the others (n = 3) had a delay in mobilisation, due to some fragmentation in care. There was no documentation of patient and relative education on the prevention of PIs (n = 0). All the patients were provided with the right pressure redistributing mattress however, some mattresses were bottoming out. Some causes overlapped, with system defects like lack of protocols, equipment and tools pushing human errors to occur. This created a series of events leading to the adverse event. The identification of these factors helped to provide an understanding of the changes that are needed to reduce future harm and improve patient safety.ConclusionRecommendations were proposed to reduce contributing factors to the development of hospital-acquired PIs. These include audits to reinforce adherence to hospital guidelines, streamlining of the documentation system, investment in new equipment and improvements to educational programmes. The recommendations implemented resulted in a decreased incidence rate of HAPIs.     

A prospective comparative study on the effectiveness of two different non-adherent polyurethane dressings on split-thickness skin graft donor sites

AimTo analyze differences in re-epithelization, exudate absorbency, ease and pain on dressing removal between ALLEVYN? Non-Adhesive and Betaplast? N.MethodologyPatients admitted to the general ward undergoing split skin grafting were recruited. Allevyn and Betaplast were applied on the donor site. Exudate absorption was assessed daily using an absorbency grading chart. Dressing change was done on post-operative day five. Ease of dressing removal and pain score using the Wong-Baker Pain Scale was assessed. The percentage of re-epithelization for each dressing was assessed.Results30 patients were recruited. There was a statistically significant difference in exudate absorption on post-operative day 3 (z = ?2.006, p = 0.045, T = 236) and post-operative day 4 (z = ?2.026, p = 0.0143, T = 188), pain score (z = ?2.861, p = 0.004, T = 180), ease of removal (z = ?2.668, p = 0.008, T = 126) and re-epithelization (z = ?2.566, p = 0.009, T = 336) between Betaplast and Allevyn.ConclusionBetaplast may have faster re-epithelization, better exudate absorption, and is easier to remove while minimizing discomfort as compared to Allevyn.     

Evaluating the effects of sedentary behaviour on plantar skin health in people with diabetes

BackgroundDiabetes-Related Foot Ulcers (DRFUs) are a common and devastating consequence of Diabetes Mellitus and are associated with high morbidity, mortality, social and economic costs. Whilst peak plantar pressures during gait are implicated cited as a major contributory factor, DRFU occurrence has also been associated with increased periods of sedentary behaviour. The present study was designed aimed to assess the effects of sitting postures on plantar tissue health.MethodsAfter a period of acclimatisation, transcutaneous oxygen tensions (T_CPO₂) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α and IL-1RA) were measured at the dorsal and plantar aspects of the forefoot before, during and after a 20-min period of seated-weight-bearing in participants with diabetes (n = 11) and no diabetes (n = 10). Corresponding interface pressures at the plantar site were also measured.ResultsDuring weight-bearing, participants with diabetes showed increases in tissue ischaemia which were linearly correlated proportional to plantar pressures (Pearson's r = 0.81; p < 0.05). Within the healthy group, no such correlation was evident (p > 0.05). There were also significant increases in post seated weight-bearing values for ratio for IL-1α and IL-1RA, normalised to total protein, post seated weight-bearing in participants with diabetes compared to healthy controls.ConclusionThis study shows that prolonged sitting may be detrimental to plantar skin health. It highlights the need to further examine the effects of prolonged sitting in individuals, who may have a reduced tolerance to loading in the plantar skin and soft tissues.     

Preventing recurrence after surgical repair of pressure injuries in patients with spinal cord injury: Effects of a presurgical and postsurgical wheelchair seating intervention by experts

ObjectivePressure injuries in people with spinal cord injury or dysfunction (SCI/D) are known to have a high recurrence rate. As a countermeasure, we perform surgery after adjusting the wheelchair and cushion with the intervention of a seating expert. The effectiveness of seating interventions in postsurgical recurrence prevention was examined.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective analysis, the participants were 19 patients with SCI/D who underwent pressure injury surgical treatment in the gluteal region from 2005 to 2018. The patients with conventional rehabilitation were assigned to Group 1 (n = 8), and those with seating intervention by experts in addition to conventional rehabilitation were assigned to Group 2 (n = 11). The main outcome measure was the presence or absence of recurrence 3 years after the surgery. The recurrence rate was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe recurrence rates were 18% with seating intervention and 75% without; there was a significant difference (p = 0.025). The recurrence odds ratio was 13.5.ConclusionThis study suggests that presurgical seating evaluation and assessment by experts, postsurgical rehabilitation based on presurgical evaluation and assessment, and routine follow-up and seating adjustment according to changes are efficacious for preventing postsurgical pressure injury recurrence in patients with SCI/D.     

Use of nasal septal bone to straighten septal L-Strut in correction of east Asian short nose: A retrospective study

Background

The perpendicular plate of ethmoid (PPE) was used to correct short noses in rhinoplasty in Asians, but the safe harvest of the plate and the assessment of its clinical application has been perplexing to plastic surgeons.

Aims

To explore how to safely cut the perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone and evaluate its application effect.

Patients/Methods

A finite element model was established to guide the clinical operation. A total of 30 patients with short noses were selected. Among them, 15 patients used autologous septal cartilage to lengthen the nasal tip, and 15 patients used the PPE to strengthen the L-shape nasal septum. The differences in the esthetic parameters of the nose, complications, and patients' satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

Results

Significant differences were noted in the nasal dorsal length (p = 0.001), Goode's ratio (p = 0.001), and nasofrontal angle (p = 0.003) after rhinoplasty, and no significant differences were noted in any of the esthetic parameters between the two groups. The symptoms of nasal obstruction in the experimental group were significantly lighter than those in the control group (p = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in the doctors' assessment of outcomes between the two groups (p = 0.48).

Conclusion

The safest region to harvest the PPE is in the middle and lower third. Rhinoplasty improves the esthetics of the patient's nose. The PPE used to strengthen the L-shape nasal septum structure has a smaller probability of nasal septal deviation with the time in Asian short noses.     

A randomized controlled trial to compare the interface pressures of alternating pressure overlay with gel pad versus gel pad alone during prolonged surgery

IntroductionProlonged surgery is a known risk of pressure ulcer formation. Pressure ulcers affect the quality of life, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and pose a burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of an alternating pressure (AP) overlay with Gel pad against the Gel pad in reducing interface pressure (IP) during prolonged surgery.MethodsA total of 180 participants from a tertiary hospital were randomized to AP overlay with Gel pad group (n = 90) and Gel pad group (n = 90). Patients were placed supine on the pressure redistributing surfaces, and IP data under the sacrum and ischial tuberosities were collected at an interval of 30 min from 0 min up to a maximum of 570 min.ResultsBased on data from 133 participants, the average IPs during all the deflation cycles of the AP overlay (with Gel pad) were significantly lower than the average continuous IP recorded for Gel pad throughout the measuring period (p < 0.001). Only three patients (2.26% of study participants) – Gel pad group (n = 2; 2.99%) and AP overlay with Gel pad group (n = 1; 1.52%) developed post-operative pressure ulcer (p = 0.5687).ConclusionsThe lower IP during deflation cycles of the AP overlay (with Gel pad) suggests its potential effectiveness in preventing pressure ulcer formation in patients undergoing prolonged surgery. The prevention and reduction of pressure ulcers will have a considerable impact on the improved quality of life and cost savings for the patient. The study findings may facilitate the formulation of policies for preventing pressure ulcer development in the perioperative setting.     

Nutritional status as a predictor of the incidence of pressure injury in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimPressure injuries are a significant health care problem worldwide, and many factors influence their occurrence and development. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the role of nutritional status in the development rate of pressure injuries as a potentially modifiable risk factor.MethodsStudy designs included cohort (prospective and retrospective), case-control, and RCTs if the association between nutrition status and pressure injuries was reported. Databases searched included: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on April 20th, 2022. The data were analyzed using OR and random effect model in Revman5.3 and STATA 15 Software. Report this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA 2020 statement.ResultsA total of 22 separate studies were retained in this systematic review. Of these, 16 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies were assessed as low risk and sixteen as a moderate risk of bias. All RCTs were B quality. The odds ratio of the incidence of pressure injuries in malnourished and non-malnourished patients was 3.66(95% CI: 2.77–4.83). In the three RCTs studies(n = 870), the odds ratio of the incidence of pressure ulcers in patients with standard nutrition to those with specific nutritional interventions was 1.35(95%CI:1.02–1.78).ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed that nutritional status is significantly associated with pressure injuries. Malnutrition can increase the incidence of pressure injuries, and specific nutritional interventions can reduce the incidence of pressure injuries compared to standard nutrition.     

Influence of blistering lesions on foot functionality in hikers

BackgroundFriction blisters are formed by abrasion from frictional forces on the upper layer of the epidermis and can make physical activity an uncomfortable experience. To our knowledge, no previous studies have considered how these injuries affect the functionality of the foot. For this reason, the main aim of this study was to evaluate foot function in hikers, with or without blisters.Material and methodsThis case-control study examined 298 hikers who walked the Camino de Santiago long-distance trail (in northern Spain); 207 had one or more blistering foot lesions and 91 had no blisters. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, and the number of blisters and their locations on the foot were recorded. All participants self-completed the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire, in their native language.ResultsPain and disability were significantly greater among the hikers with blisters (pain p=<0.001; disability p = 0.015). However, there were no significant differences in the limitation of physical activity between those with blisters (case group) and the control group (p = 0.144). Neither was there any correlation between the number of blisters and pain, disability or limitation of activity. However, the location of the lesion did influence foot functionality. Blisters on the metatarsal heads were more limiting and caused greater pain (right foot p = 0.009; left foot p = 0.017), greater disability (right foot p = 0.005; left foot p = 0.005), greater limitation of activity (on right foot p = 0.012) and more loss of foot functionality (right foot p = 0.002; left foot p = 0.007).ConclusionThe hikers with blisters experienced reduced foot functionality in terms of pain and disability. The number of blisters was not related to foot functionality. Blisters located on the metatarsal heads caused the greatest increase in pain, disability and limitation of activity.     

Protective equipment-related pressure ulcers in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

AimThis systematic review was carried out to examine pressure ulcers in healthcare staff due to the use of protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic and the precautions taken to prevent these injuries.MethodRelevant studies were retrospectively searched. Seven English keywords identified from MESH were used while searching. The search was carried out in five international databases by trying various combinations of these words during February 15–25, 2021. This systematic review was updated by rescanning databases on December 20, 2021 and a total of 611 studies were attained.Results17 studies which met the study inclusion criteria, which were conducted mostly through online survey method in different study designs and which included a total of 24,889 healthcare professionals were examined. The incidence of PPE-related pressure ulcers was found to be between 30% and 92.8%. Grade I pressure ulcers were the most common (44.1%–82%). The incidence of skin problems except PPE-related pressure ulcers such as itching, redness and dry skin was found to be between 42.8–88.1%. Risk factors that frequently played a role in the development of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were longer use of PPE and sweating. PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were more frequent over the nose (nasal bone/nasal bridge), ears, forehead and cheeks. PPE-related itching, redness and dry skin mostly occurred. Several dressing applications were found to be effective in the prevention of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems that might develop especially on the facial region.ConclusionPPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were found to be higher among healthcare professionals. Data regarding the sealing of dressing applications against viral transmission in the prevention of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems are limited. It is estimated that future studies will be performed to prevent device-related pressure ulcers in healthcare workers. It is suggested that there is a need to conduct studies with larger samples where expert researchers make observations for pressure ulcers in order to determine the prevalence and incidence of PPE-related pressure ulcers.     

Once daily 300 mg aspirin with compression versus compression alone in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (ASPiVLU): A randomised,double-blinded,multicentre, placebo-controlled,clinical trial

AimVenous leg ulcers are lower limb skin ulcers characterised by a cycle of healing and recurrence due to underlying chronic venous insufficiency. While compression improves healing outcomes, many ulcers do not heal. As a daily 300 mg oral dose of aspirin in conjunction with compression may improve healing outcomes, we investigated the effect of adjuvant aspirin on venous leg ulcer healing in participants already receiving compression.Materials and methodsWe conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (known as ASPiVLU). Participants were recruited from six wound clinics in Australia. We screened 844 participants. Community-dwelling adult participants identified at six hospital outpatient clinics and clinically diagnosed with a venous leg ulcer present for 6+ weeks were eligible between April 13, 2015 to June 30, 2018. We randomised 40 participants (n = 19 aspirin, n = 21 placebo) and evaluated against the primary outcome. There were no dropouts. Ten serious adverse events in six participants were recorded. None were study related. The primary outcome measure was healing at 12 weeks based on blinded assessment.ResultsWe found no difference in the number of ulcers healed at 12 weeks between the intervention and control groups.ConclusionThis study could not detect whether or not aspirin affected VLU healing speed. This is likely because we recruited fewer participants than expected due to the high number of people with venous leg ulcers in Australia who were already taking Aspirin; future research should investigate other adjuvant therapies or different study designs.     

Efficacy of gel containing organic extra virgin olive oil for peristomal skin hygiene: A pilot randomised controlled trial

AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of the application, during stoma hygiene, of a pH-neutral gel containing organic EVOO (oEVOO) for the maintenance of peristomal skin integrity.MethodPatients with a colostomy or ileostomy were enrolled in a pilot randomized controlled trial and assigned treatment with a pH-neutral gel made from natural products including oEVOO or usual stoma hygiene gel. The primary outcome was three domains of abnormal peristomal skin: Discolouration, Erosion and Tissue overgrowth. Secondary outcomes that were evaluated included skin moisture; oiliness; skin elasticity; water-oil balance; patients’ perceptions; difficulty inserting and removing the pouching system; pain, any other chemical, infectious, mechanical, or immunological complications of concern. The intervention lasted 8 weeks.ResultsTwenty-one patients were recruited for the trial and randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 12) or the control group (n = 9). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of patient characteristics. No significant differences between groups were identified either at baseline (p = 0.203) or at the end of the intervention (p = 0.397). In the experimental group, domains of abnormal peristomal skin improved after the intervention. The difference observed before and after the intervention was statistically significant (p = 0.031).ConclusionThe use of a gel containing oEVOO has shown similar levels of efficacy and safety to other gels commonly used for peristomal skin hygiene. It is also relevant to highlight that a significant improvement in skin condition was observed in the experimental group before and after the intervention.     

Manifestaciones dermatológicas en los profesionales de la salud asociadas al uso de equipo de protección personal para la atención de los pacientes con infección por COVID-19 en los hospitales del área metropolitana de la ciudad de México

BackgroundSince the outbreak of the coronavirus disease-2019 (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019, thousands of healthcare workers have faced this highly contagious disease; For its handling, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) consisting of masks, goggles and protective clothing is needed for long periods of time, generating the appearance of various skin manifestations (pressure injuries, contact dermatitis, urticaria and exacerbation of pre-existing skin diseases).ObjectiveTo describe the frequency of cutaneous manifestations caused by the use of PPE in healthcare workers and the risk factors for developing them.MethodologyFrom June 4 to 14, 2020; 1,000 surveys were distributed online to health workers from 12 hospitals in the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Results. 78% showed dermatological alterations associated with PPE, mainly xerosis, scaling and erythema, with greater involvement in the hands, the nasal bridge and the cheeks, usually accompanied by itching and pain. There was a relationship between the use of PPE and the exacerbation of dermatological diseases, mainly rosacea (OR 2.96). It was shown that the alcohol gel increased 1.8 and 2 times the risk of presenting xerosis and fissures respectively, with an association (OR 2.3) between constant hand washing and xerosis.ConclusionThe exacerbation and increase of dermatosis associated with the use of PPE and the associated factors for its appearance were observed.     

Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases

BackgroundThe ear is a region that has a high prevalence of cutaneous carcinomas and several guidelines indicate Mohs micrographic surgery as the first-choice treatment in such cases. Although the technique allows maximum preservation of healthy tissue, many auricular surgical wounds constitute a challenge due to the peculiar local anatomy, with evident curves and reliefs. Auricular reconstruction should prioritize function before aesthetics, but without leaving the latter aside, since postoperative distortions can have a significant psychological impact.ObjectiveTo describe the authors’ experience in auricular reconstruction after Mohs surgery and to evaluate the most frequently used repair methods.MethodsRetrospective study of consecutive cases submitted to Mohs surgery and auricular reconstruction, over a period of 3 years.ResultsOne hundred and one cases were included and the most common repair method was primary closure (n = 35), followed by full-thickness skin graft (n = 30) and flaps (n = 24). In thirty cases, reconstruction methods were associated. Seven patients had complications (partial graft necrosis, postoperative bleeding or infection).Study limitationsRetrospective design and the absence of long-term follow-up of some cases.ConclusionsThe dermatologic surgeon should be familiarized with different options for auricular reconstruction. Primary closure and skin grafts were the most frequently used repair methods.     

Adaptation of a MR imaging protocol into a real-time clinical biometric ultrasound protocol for persons with spinal cord injury at risk for deep tissue injury: A reliability study

BackgroundHigh strain in soft tissues that overly bony prominences are considered a risk factor for pressure ulcers (PUs) following spinal cord impairment (SCI) and have been computed using Finite Element methods (FEM). The aim of this study was to translate a MRI protocol into ultrasound (US) and determine between-operator reliability of expert sonographers measuring diameter of the inferior curvature of the ischial tuberosity (IT) and the thickness of the overlying soft tissue layers on able-bodied (AB) and SCI using real-time ultrasound.Material and methodsPart 1: Fourteen AB participants with a mean age of 36.7 ± 12.09 years with 7 males and 7 females had their 3 soft tissue layers in loaded and unloaded sitting measured independently by 2 sonographers: tendon/muscle, skin/fat and total soft tissue and the diameter of the IT in its short and long axis. Part 2: Nineteen participants with SCI were screened, three were excluded due to abnormal skin signs, and eight participants (42%) were excluded for abnormal US signs with normal skin. Eight SCI participants with a mean age of 31.6 ± 13.6 years and all male with 4 paraplegics and 4 tetraplegics were measured by the same sonographers for skin, fat, tendon, muscle and total. Skin/fat and tendon/muscle were computed.ResultsAB between-operator reliability was good (ICC = 0.81–0.90) for 3 soft tissues layers in unloaded and loaded sitting and poor for both IT short and long axis (ICC = −0.028 and −0.01). SCI between-operator reliability was good in unloaded and loaded for total, muscle, fat, skin/fat, tendon/muscle (ICC = 0.75–0.97) and poor for tendon (ICC = 0.26 unloaded and ICC = −0.71 loaded) and skin (ICC = 0.37 unloaded and ICC = 0.10).ConclusionA MRI protocol was successfully adapted for a reliable 3 soft tissue layer model and could be used in a 2-D FEM model designed to estimate soft tissue strain as a novel risk factor for the development of a PU.     

Hemicellulose dressing versus rayon dressing in the re-epithelialization of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a multicenter study

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a hemicellulose dressing with that of rayon dressing in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Twenty-eight patients were selected from five different hospitals and randomized into two groups: hemicellulose dressing group and rayon dressing group. All patients underwent split-thickness skin grafting for various reasons, and the skin graft donor site wounds were covered with hemicellulose dressing (n = 14) or rayon dressing (n = 14). The donor site was assessed on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 for hyperemia, pruritus, pain, exudate level, and adherence of the wound dressing. At the 60-day follow-up visit, the donor site was assessed again for pruritus and pain. Touch-pressure, thermal, and pain sensibility tests were performed preoperatively and on postoperative day 60 together with the assessment of color and texture of the re-epithelialized area. In all patients, re-epithelialization was completed between 14 and 21 days after surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to pain, hyperemia, pruritus, exudate, and final appearance (color and texture) of the skin graft donor site. The rayon dressing provided significantly better adherence than the hemicellulose dressing, and both dressings showed similar results with regard to the parameters evaluated when used in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.