A new score for improving cardiovascular risk prediction and prevention

Background and aimsThe ultrasonographic detection of subclinical atherosclerosis (scATS) at carotid and femoral vascular sites using the atherosclerosis burden score (ABS) improves the risk stratification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beyond traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. However, its predictive value should be further enhanced. We hypothesize that combining the ABS and the Framingham risk score (FHRS) to create a new score called the FHRABS will improve CV risk prediction and prevention. We aim to investigate if incorporating the ABS into the FHRS improved CV risk prediction in a primary prevention setting.Methods and results1024 patients were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Carotid and femoral plaques were ultra-sonographic detected. Major incident cardiovascular events (MACEs) were collected. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and Youden's index (Ysi) were used to compare the incremental contributions of each marker to predict MACEs.After a median follow-up of 6.0 ± 3.3 years, 60 primary MACEs (5.8%) occurred. The ROC-AUC for MACEs prediction was significantly higher for the FHRABS (0.74, p < 0.024) and for the ABS (0.71, p < 0.013) compared to the FHRS alone (0.71, p < 0.46). Ysi or the FHRABS (42%, p < 0.001) and ABS (37%, p < 0.001) than for the FHRS (31%). Cox proportional-hazard models showed that the CV predictive performance of FHRS was significantly enhanced by the ABS (10.8 vs. 5.5, p < 0.001) and FHRABS (HR 23.30 vs. 5.50, p < 0.001).ConclusionsFHRABS is a useful score for improving CV risk stratification and detecting patients at high risk of future MACEs. FHRABS offers a simple-to-use, and radiation-free score with which to detect scATS in order to promote personalized CV prevention.     

Renal Denervation in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension

BackgroundRenal denervation (RDN) is under investigation for treatment of uncontrolled hypertension and might represent an attractive treatment for patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk. It is important to determine whether baseline CV risk affects the efficacy of RDN.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess blood pressure (BP) reduction and event rates after RDN in patients with various comorbidities, testing the hypothesis that RDN is effective and durable in these high-risk populations.MethodsBP reduction and adverse events over 3 years were evaluated for several high-risk subgroups in the GSR (Global proSpective registrY for syMPathetic renaL denervatIon in seleCted IndicatIons Through 3 Years Registry), an international registry of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (n = 2,652). Comparisons were made for patients age ≥65 years versus age <65 years, with versus without isolated systolic hypertension, with versus without atrial fibrillation, and with versus without diabetes mellitus. Baseline cardiovascular risk was estimated using the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score.ResultsReduction in 24-h systolic BP at 3 years was −8.9 ± 20.1 mm Hg for the overall cohort, and for high-risk subgroups, BP reduction was −10.4 ± 21.0 mm Hg for resistant hypertension, −8.7 ± 17.4 mm Hg in patients age ≥65 years, −10.2 ± 17.9 mm Hg in patients with diabetes, −8.6 ± 18.7 mm Hg in isolated systolic hypertension, −10.1 ± 20.3 mm Hg in chronic kidney disease, and −10.0 ± 19.1 mm Hg in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.0001 compared with baseline for all). BP reduction in patients with measurements at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months showed similar reductions in office and 24-h BP for patients with varying baseline ASCVD risk scores, which was sustained to 3 years. Adverse event rates at 3 years were higher for patients with higher baseline CV risk.ConclusionsBP reduction after RDN was similar for patients with varying high-risk comorbidities and across the range of ASCVD risk scores. The impact of baseline risk on clinical event reduction by RDN-induced BP changes could be evaluated in further studies. (Global proSpective registrY for syMPathetic renaL denervatIon in seleCted IndicatIons Through 3 Years Registry; NCT01534299)     

Implications of routinely measuring Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) among patients attending at a Lipid Clinic

BackgroundLow (≤  0.90) Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) values identify patients at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease and mortality. Implications for CV risk classification from routinely measuring ABI in the context of a Lipid Clinic have not been fully investigated. We aimed to evaluate whether and to what extent routine ABI determination on top of conventional risk prediction models may modify CV risk classification.MethodsConsecutive asymptomatic non-diabetic individuals free from previous CV events attending for a first visit at a Lipid Clinic underwent routine ABI determination and conventional CV risk classification according either to national CUORE model (including age, gender, smoking, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and current use of blood pressure lowering drugs) and SCORE model for low risk countries.ResultsIn the overall sample (320 subjects, mean age 64.8 years) 77 subjects (24.1%) were found to have low ABI value. Forty-two of 250 subjects (16.8%) and 47 of 215 individuals (21.3%) at low or moderate risk according to the CUORE and SCORE models, respectively, were found to have low ABI values, and should be reclassified at high risk.ConclusionIn a series of consecutive asymptomatic individuals in a Lipid Clinic, we observed a high prevalence of low ABI values among subjects deemed at low or moderate risk on conventional prediction models, leading to CV high-risk reclassification of roughly one fifth of patients. These findings reinforce recommendations for routine determination of ABI at least within referral primary prevention settings.     

Évaluation du risque cardiovasculaire chez les patients hypertendus selon le SCORE2 et le SCORE OP dans une population d'Afrique subsaharienne

BackgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular risk assessment is performed using specific algorithms, particularly SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP developed by the European Society of Cardiology.Patients and methodsProspective cohort study from February 1, 2022, to July 31, 2022, enrolling 410 hypertensive patients. Epidemiological, paraclinical, therapeutic, and follow-up data were analyzed. Cardiovascular risk stratification of patients was performed using SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP algorithms. We compared the initial and 6-month cardiovascular risks.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 60.88 ± 12.35 years with a female predominance (sex ratio = 0.66). In addition to hypertension, dyslipidemia (45.4%) was the most frequently associated risk factor. A high proportion of patients were classified as high (48.6%) and very high (46.3%) cardiovascular risk, with a significant difference between men and women. Reassessment of cardiovascular risk after 6 months of treatment found significant differences compared with the initial cardiovascular risk (p < 0.001). The rate of patients at low to moderate cardiovascular risk (49.5%) increased substantially, whereas the proportion of patients at very high risk decreased (6.8%).ConclusionOur study conducted at Abidjan Heart Institute in a young population of patients with hypertension revealed a severe cardiovascular risk profile. Almost half of the patients are classified at very high cardiovascular risk, based on the SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP. The widespread use of these new algorithms for risk stratification should lead to more aggressive management and prevention strategies for hypertension and associated risk factors.     

Primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension: Assessment of cardiovascular risk at diagnosis and after treatment

Background and aimsPrimary aldosteronism (PA), the most frequent form of secondary hypertension, is characterized by a higher rate of cardiovascular (CV) events than essential hypertension (EH).Aim of the study was to evaluate the cardiovascular risk according to the ESH/ESC 2007 guidelines, in patients with PA and with EH, at diagnosis and after treatment.Methods and resultsWe prospectively studied 102 PA patients (40 with aldosterone producing adenoma-APA and 62 with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism-IHA) and 132 essential hypertensives at basal and after surgical or medical treatment (mean follow-up period 44 months for PA and 42 months for EH).At baseline evaluation the stratification of CV risk was significantly different: the predominant risk category was the high CV risk (50% in total PA, 53% in PA matched for blood pressure values and 55% in EH), but the very high risk category was twice in PA than in EH patients (36% in total PA and 33% in matched PA vs. 17% in EH, p < 0.05). The worse risk profile of PA was due to a higher prevalence of glycemic alterations, metabolic syndrome and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (p < 0.05).After adequate treatment, the CV risk was significantly reduced becoming comparable in PA and in EH patient due to a reduction of hypertension grading, prevalence of metabolic syndrome, hypertension persistence and LVH (p < 0.05).ConclusionPatients with PA present a high CV risk, which is in part reversible after specific treatment, due both to the reduced blood pressure values and to the improvement of end-organ damage.     

Cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected individuals: A comparison of three risk prediction algorithms

IntroductionCardiovascular (CV) risk is known to be increased in HIV-infected individuals. Our aim was to assess CV risk in HIV-infected adults.MethodsCV risk was estimated for each patient using three different risk algorithms: SCORE, the Framingham risk score (FRS), and DAD. Patients were classified as at low, moderate or high CV risk. Clinical and anthropometric data were collected.ResultsWe included 571 HIV-infected individuals, mostly male (67.1%; n=383). Patients were divided into two groups according to antiretroviral therapy (ART): naïve (7.5%; n=43) or under ART (92.5%; n=528). The mean time since HIV diagnosis was 6.7±6.5 years in the naive group and 13.3±6.1 years in the ART group. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was identified in 33.9% (n=179) and 16.3% (n=7) of participants in the ART and naïve groups, respectively. MS was associated with ART (OR=2.7; p=0.018). Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl (OR=13.643, p<0.001) was one of the major factors contributing to MS. Overall, high CV risk was found in 4.4% (n=23) of patients when the SCORE tool was used, in 20.5% (n=117) using the FRS, and in 10.3% (n=59) using the DAD score. The observed agreement between the FRS and SCORE was 55.4% (k=0.183, p<0.001), between the FRS and DAD 70.5% (k=0.465, p<0.001), and between SCORE and DAD 72.3% (k=0.347, p<0.001).ConclusionOn the basis of the three algorithms, we detected a high rate of high CV risk, particularly in patients under ART. The FRS was the algorithm that classified most patients in the high CV risk category (20.5%). In addition, a high prevalence of MS was identified in this patient group.     

Suboptimal control of cardiovascular risk factors in myocardial infarction survivors in a cardiac rehabilitation program

Introduction and objectivesAs short-term mortality continues to decrease after myocardial infarction (MI), secondary prevention strategies attain increasing relevance. This study aimed at assessing the control of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, in a contemporary cohort of MI survivors who completed an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) program.MethodsObservational, retrospective cohort study including patients admitted to a tertiary center with acute MI between November 2012 and April 2017, who completed a phase II EBCR program after discharge. Achievement of low-density lipoprotein (LD) cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c guideline recommended targets was assessed. Lipid profile parameters were assessed and compared at three time points (hospitalization, beginning and end of the program).ResultsA total of 379 patients were included. Mean age was 58.8±10.6 years; 81% were male. Considering the European Society of Cardiology's guidelines on contemporary data collection, 61%, 87% and 71% achieved the recommended LDL cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c targets, respectively, at the end of the program. Combining all three risk factors, 42% achieved the recommended targets. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein decreased between the beginning and the end of the program [0.14 (0.08-0.29) mg/L to 0.12 (0.06-0.26) mg/L; p<0.001].ConclusionDespite contemporary management strategies, including enrollment in a structured EBCR program, a substantial number of patients presented suboptimal control of CV risk factors. Considering the dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes results, less than half of the enrolled individuals achieved the recommended targets. These findings highlight a pivotal unmet need which could be particularly relevant in improving CV outcomes by enhancing secondary prevention profiles.     

Care manager to control cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: The Raffaello cluster randomized trial

Background and aimThis cluster randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of a disease and care management (D&CM) model in cardiovascular (CVD) prevention in primary care.Methods and resultsEligible subjects had ≥1 among: blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg; glycated hemoglobin ≥ 7%; LDL-cholesterol ≥ 160 or ≥100 mg/dL (primary or secondary prevention, respectively); BMI ≥ 30; current smoking. The D&CM intervention included a teamwork including nurses as care managers for the implementation of tailored care plans. Control group was allocated to usual-care. The main outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving recommended clinical targets for ≥1 of uncontrolled CVD risk factors at 12-month. During 2008–2009 we enrolled 920 subjects in the Abruzzo/Marche regions, Italy. Following the exclusion of L'Aquila due to 2009 earthquake, final analyses included 762 subjects. The primary outcome was achieved by 39.1% (95%CI: 34.2–44.2) and 25.2% (95%CI: 20.9–29.9) of subjects in the intervention and usual-care group, respectively (p < 0.001). The D&CM intervention significantly increased the proportion of subjects who achieved clinical targets for both diabetes and hypertension, with no differences in hypercholesterolemia, smoking status and obesity.ConclusionsThe D&CM intervention was effective in controlling cardiovascular risk factors, in particular hypertension and diabetes. Numbers needed to treat were small. Such intervention may deserve further consideration in clinical practice.Registration number: ACTRN12611000813987.     

Population implications of lipid lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: data from the 1995 Scottish health survey

OBJECTIVE—To determine the proportion of the population, firstly, with cholesterol  5.0 mmol/l and, secondly, with any cholesterol concentration, who might benefit from statin treatment for the following: secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD); primary prevention at CHD risk 30%, 20%, 15%, and 6% over 10 years; and primary prevention at projected CHD risk 20% over 10 years (CHD risk at age 60 years if actual age < 60 years).
SUBJECTS—Random stratified sample of 3963 subjects aged 35-64 years from the Scottish health survey 1995.
RESULTS—For secondary prevention 7.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9% to 8.6%) of the population with cholesterol  5.0 mmol/l would benefit from statins. For primary prevention, the prevalence of people at CHD risk 30%, 20%, 15%, and 6% over 10 years is 1.5% (95% CI 1.2% to 1.9%), 5.4% (95% CI 4.7% to 6.1%), 9.7% (95% CI 8.8% to 10.6%), and 32.9% (95% CI 31.5% to 34.4%), respectively. At projected CHD risk 20% over 10 years, 12.4% (95% CI 11.4% to 13.5%) would be treated with statins. Removing the 5.0 mmol/l cholesterol threshold makes little difference to population prevalence at high CHD risk.
CONCLUSIONS—Statin treatment would be required for 7.8% of the population for secondary prevention. For primary prevention, among other factors, guidelines should take into account the number of patients needing treatment at different levels of CHD risk when choosing the CHD risk to target. The analysis supports a policy of targeting treatment at CHD risk 30% over 10 years as a minimum, as recommended in current British guidelines, with a move to treating at CHD risk 15% over 10 years as resources permit.


Keywords: statins; coronary risk; secondary prevention; primary prevention     

Which serum uric acid levels are associated with increased cardiovascular risk in the general adult population?

Our aim was to determine the serum uric acid (SUA) levels associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) and all‐cause death in the general adult population. We analyzed data obtained in two independent cross‐sectional surveys performed in the Czech Republic in 2006‐09 and 2015‐18, involving 1% population random samples in nine districts, aged 25‐64 years, stratified by age and gender. Ten‐year mortality data were obtained in a cohort with examination in 2006‐09. Final analyses included 3542 individuals (48.2% men) examined in 2006‐09, and 2304 (47.4% men) examined in 2015‐18. From a cohort examined in 2006‐09, 122 men and 60 women were reported dead (33% and 27% from CV disease). In men, there was no association of baseline SUA levels with baseline SCORE category or 10‐year mortality rates. In women, each 10 µmol/L increase in baseline SUA levels was associated with an increase in baseline SCORE category (P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses in women identified the baseline SUA cutoff values discriminating: 1. between low/intermediate and high/very high SCORE categories (309 µmol/L), 2. CV mortality (325 µmol/L), and 3. all‐cause mortality (298 µmol/L). After adjusting for confounders including SCORE, Cox regression analysis confirmed that the baseline SUA cutoffs of 309 µmol/L and 325 µmol/L were associated with 4‐times (P = .010) and 6‐times (P = .036) greater risk of CV mortality, whereas the cutoff of 298 µmol/L was associated with 87% greater risk of all‐cause mortality (P = .025). In conclusion, the SUA cutoff value of 309 µmol/L identified women at high/very high SCORE category and was associated with 4‐times greater risk of observed CV mortality over 10 years.     

Assessing the applicability of 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines for secondary stroke prevention in the BOSS study

Using data from the Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcome in TIA or Ischemic Stroke (BOSS) study, we aim to test the applicability and feasibility of stroke secondary prevention recommendations from the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline. Patients were categorized based on their blood pressure (BP) status at 3 months. The nonhypertension group was defined as those without a diagnosis of hypertension. The other patients were further divided into three subgroups according to office BP measured at 3‐month visit (BP <130/80, 130‐139/80‐89, and ≥140/90 mm Hg). The primary outcome was any stroke within one year. The associations between BP status and 1‐year prognosis (recurrent stroke, recurrent stroke/TIA, and poor functional outcome [modified Rankin scale score 3‐6]) were estimated. Among 2341 IS/TIA patients, additional 1056 patients were classified as uncontrolled hypertension at the 90‐day visit according to the new guidelines. Adjusted hazard/odds ratios (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for recurrent stroke in BP <130/80, 130‐139/80‐89, and ≥140/90 compared with nonhypertension group were 2.42 (95% CI: 0.87‐6.76), and 4.30 (95% CI: 1.73‐10.70), respectively. The prevalence of hypertension and uncontrolled BP among BOSS study population was substantially higher based on the new guidelines. BP of 130‐139/80‐89 did not show the worsened clinical outcomes compared with people without hypertension. Our study adds to the growing uncertainty about secondary prevention BP goal for IS/TIA patients.     

Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in very elderly patients receiving antihypertensive drug therapy: a subgroup analysis of Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure (HONEST) study

The appropriate target blood pressure (BP) in elderly patients with hypertension remains uncertain. We investigated the relationship between morning home systolic blood pressure (MHSBP) during follow-up and cardiovascular (CV) risk in outpatients receiving olmesartan-based treatment aged <75 years (n = 16799) and ≥75 years (n = 4792) in the HONEST study. In the follow-up period (mean 2.02 years), the risk for major CV events was significantly higher in patients with MHSBP ≥155 mmHg compared with <125 mmHg in both age groups in Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for other risk factors and there was no significant difference in trend between the two groups (interaction P = 0.9917 for MHSBP). Hazard ratios for CV events for 1-mmHg increase in MHSBP were similar in patients aged <75 years and in patients aged ≥75 years. The incidence of adverse drug reactions related to excessive BP lowering was lower in patients <75 years than in patients ≥75 years (0.73 vs 1.02%, P = 0.0461).

In conclusion, the study suggests even in patients ≥75 years antihypertensive treatment targeting the same MHSBP levels in patients <75 years may be beneficial in reducing CV risk when treatment is tolerated.     

Suboptimal lipid levels in clinical practice among Portuguese adults with dyslipidemia under lipid-lowering therapy: Data from the DISGEN-LIPID study

IntroductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Portugal. Hypercholesterolemia has a causal role in atherosclerotic CVD. Guidelines recommend that cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction should be individualized and treatment goals identified. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary treatment target.MethodsDISGEN-LIPID was a cross-sectional observational study conducted in 24 centers in Portugal in dyslipidemic patients aged ≥40 years, on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for at least three months and with an available lipid profile in the previous six months.ResultsA total of 368 patients were analyzed: 48.9% men and 51.1% women (93.9% postmenopausal), of whom 73% had a SCORE of high or very high CV risk. One quarter had a family history of premature CVD; 31% had diabetes; 26% coronary heart disease; 9.5% cerebrovascular disease; and 4.1% peripheral arterial disease. Mean baseline lipid values were total cholesterol (TC) 189 mg/dl, LDL-C 116 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 53.5 mg/dl, and triglycerides (TG) 135 mg/dl. Women had higher TC (p<0.001), LDL-C (non-significant) and HDL-C (p<0.001), and lower TG (p=0.002); 57% of men and 63% of women had LDL-C>100 mg/dl (p=0.28), and 58% of men and 47% of women had LDL-C>70 mg/dl (p=0.933).ConclusionThese observational data show that, despite their high-risk profile, more than half of patients under LLT, both men and women, did not achieve the recommended target levels for LDL-C, and a large proportion also had abnormal HDL-C and/or TG. This is a renewed opportunity to improve clinical practice in CV prevention.     

Cardiometabolic phenotype and UKPDS risk in male type 2 diabetic patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), an obesity comorbidity, is an independent risk factor for diabetes (T2DM) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). While OSAS prevalence and association with MACE are well documented in the general population, such information is not available in T2DM.MethodsWe analyzed 467 consecutive male T2DM outpatients in whom OSAS was diagnosed through Epworth's Sleepiness Scale (ESS), overnight oximetry and polysomnography. OSAS (+) (n = 43) were compared to OSAS (?) (n = 424) regarding cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and/or MACE.ResultsMean (1 SD) age was 64 (12) years, diabetes duration 13 (9) years. Metabolic syndrome prevalence was 77%, HbA_1c 7.6 (1.6) %. OSAS prevalence was 9%. There were no differences in age, diabetes duration, smoking, blood pressure and lipids between OSAS (+) and (?). There were significant differences in ESS score, ethanol intake, hypertension, BMI, waist, relative/absolute fat, conicity index, and visceral fat, all significantly higher in OSAS (+). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure was used by 37% of OSAS (+). HOMA hyperbolic product was significantly lower in OSAS (+), as a result of more severe insulin resistance. OSAS (+) were less often in primary prevention (PP) for CV disease than OSAS (?) (43% vs. 66%; p < 0.003). MACE and coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence were 61 and 63% higher in OSAS (+) (61% vs. 38%; p < 0.01 and 44% vs. 27%; p < 0.03), who showed a higher stroke prevalence (15% vs. 8%; NS).ConclusionsOSAS is frequent in male T2DM patients. With gender and diabetes ruled out as confounders, our results indicate a strong association between OSAS and CV risk factors, such as hypertension, BMI, waist, relative/absolute/visceral fat, conicity, liver steatosis and hypoandrogenicity. Using the T2DM-specific UKPDS calculator, CVD risk estimates were high though not different between OSAS subgroups in primary CV prevention. OSAS patients with T2DM showed a marked increase in MACE/CAD, making a case for aggressive tertiary prevention.     

The ideal blood pressure target to prevent cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: A neutral viewpoint

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and essential hypertension are often associated, and retrospective data analyses suggest an association between lower blood pressure (BP) values and lower cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with T2DM. However, the most recent intervention trials fail to demonstrate a further CV risk reduction, for BP levels <130/80 mm Hg, when compared to levels <140/90 mm Hg. Moreover, a J-shaped, rather than a linear, relationship of BP reduction with incident CV events has been strongly suggested. We here debate the main available evidences for and against the concept of ‘the lower the better’, in the light of the main intervention trials and meta-analyses, with a particular emphasis on the targets to be pursued in elderly patients. Finally, the most recent guidelines of the scientific societies are critically discussed.     

Sex differences in cardiovascular and disease-related features in axial spondyloarthritis. A multicenter study of 912 patients

ObjectivesTo determine the potential impact of sex-specific disease-related characteristics on cardiovascular (CV) disease in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).MethodsCross-sectional study of the Spanish AtheSpAin cohort to study CV disease in axSpA. Data on carotid ultrasound and CV disease and disease-related features were collected.Results611 men and 301 women were recruited. Classic CV risk factors were significantly less prevalent in women, who also showed a lower frequency of carotid plaques (p = 0.001), lower carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) values ​​(p<0.001) and CV events (p = 0.008). However, after adjustment for classic CV risk factors, only the differences with respect to carotid IMT remained statistically significant. Women showed higher ESR at diagnosis (p = 0.038), and more active disease (ASDAS, p = 0.012, and BASDAI, p<0.001). They had shorter disease duration (p<0.001), lower prevalence of psoriasis (p = 0.008), less structural damage (mSASSS, p<0.001), and less mobility limitation (BASMI, p = 0.033). To establish whether these findings could lead to sex differences in CV disease burden, we compared the prevalence of carotid plaques in men and women with the same level of CV risk stratified according to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). Men included in the low-moderate CV risk SCORE category had more carotid plaques (p = 0.050), along with longer disease duration (p = 0.004), higher mSASSS (p = 0.001) and psoriasis (p = 0.023). In contrast, in the high-very high-risk SCORE category, carotid plaques were observed more frequently in women (p = 0.028), who were characterized as having worse BASFI (p = 0.011), BASDAI (p<0.001) and ASDAS (p = 0.027).ConclusionDisease-related features may influence the expression of atherosclerosis in patients with axSpA. This may be especially applicable to women at high CV risk, characterized by greater disease severity and more severe subclinical atherosclerosis than men, suggesting a stronger interaction between disease activity and atherosclerosis in women with axSpA.     

Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021

We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global cardiovascular diseases risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year cardiovascular diseases risk, lifetime cardiovascular diseases risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm ?SCORE2, SCORE2-OP? is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular diseases events (myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular mortality) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (< 50, 50-69, ≥ 70 years).Different flow charts of cardiovascular diseases risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in diabetic patients, and in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.     

Secondary Prevention of Coronary Disease with ACE Inhibition-does Blood Pressure Reduction with Perindopril Explain the Benefits in EUROPA?

Aims  We determined whether blood pressure (BP) lowering by perindopril was related to its benefit in the EUROPA study. Methods and results  Twelve thousand two hundred eighteen patients with documented coronary artery disease received perindopril 8 mg once daily or matching placebo after a 4-week run-in period in which all patients received perindopril. Patients were excluded if systolic (S) BP was >180 or <100 mmHg. Mean age was 60 years (range 26–89). 27% had a history of hypertension. After 4.2 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) was observed in 603 (9.9%) placebo versus 488 (8.0%) perindopril patients [20% relative risk reduction (RRR), CI 9–29%, P = 0.003]. There was no interaction between baseline SBP levels (using JNC-7 cutoff values) and treatment effect. If anything, the greatest RRR of the primary endpoint (32%) occurred in patients with the lowest SBP (<120 mmHg) in whom perindopril did not reduce SBP. Also, RRR during blinded treatment was comparable, irrespective of whether BP decreased or not or of the extent of BP reduction during perindopril treatment. Conclusion  The treatment benefit in EUROPA cannot be fully explained by baseline BP or BP reduction with perindopril. Other mechanisms including direct anti-atherosclerotic effects of ACE inhibition may play a role.