Sacral skin blood flow response to alternating pressure operating room overlay

Pressure injuries resulting from long surgeries may be caused by prolonged ischemia. Operating table surfaces with alternating pressure (AP) features may reduce the risk of ischemia-induced pressure injuries by providing periodic relief of blood flow occlusions. Prior research investigated alternating loading applied with a single isolated rigid indenter and demonstrated increased perfusion. This study quantified effects of an overlay with AP on sacral skin perfusion for individuals lying supine for 60-min while blood flow was monitored. The mean normalized sacral skin blood flow was found to be greater with the AP overlay over an operating table pad compared to the operating pad alone (pad with AP mean SBF?=?1.45?±?1.16, pad without AP mean SBF?=?1.03?±?0.46, p?=?0.10). Peak and average interface pressure at the sacrum was significantly lower during the deflation cycle of the AP surface compared to the operating pad alone (P?<?0.001), suggesting this periodic reduction resulted in higher mean blood flow. Post-hoc regression analysis showed participant body mass index was a significant predictor of the effectiveness of the AP overlay (p?=?0.012). The results suggest risk for pressure injuries due to prolonged ischemia might be mitigated by the addition of an alternating pressure feature on operating table pads for lower BMI patients.     

Evaluation of pressure ulcer risk and development in operating rooms

AimThis study aimed to determine the risk and development of pressure ulcers in operating rooms.Materials and methodsThe sample of the study included a total of 250 patients. In the study, the risk of pressure ulcers was assessed before the operation, and the development of pressure ulcers was evaluated within 24 h after the operation.ResultsThe risk of pressure ulcers was low before the operation, and Stage I pressure ulcer developed in 12.8% of the patients within 24 h after the operation. The patients had pressure ulcers mostly in their sacrum. Their mean 3S Intraoperative Risk Assessment Scale of Pressure Sore score was 15.68 ± 4.84, suggesting that they were not at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Having a chronic disease (OR = 8.986; 95% CI = 3.697–21.845), undergoing general anesthesia (OR = 3.084; 95% CI = 1.323–7.194), and orthopedic surgery (OR = 10.172; 95% CI = 3.121–33.155) were statistically significant risk factors for pressure ulcers (p < 0.001). Additionally, moderately edematous skin (OR = 3.838; 95% CI = 1.024–14.386), overweight/underweight (OR = 16.333; 95% CI = 3.779–70.602), intraoperative bleeding greater than 800 ml (OR = 13.000; 95% CI = 3.451–48.969), operation time longer than 5 h (OR = 21.667; 95% CI = 2.122–221.223), moderate intraoperative stress (OR = 4.917; 95% CI = 0.425–56.916), body temperature higher than 38.3 °C or lower than 36.1 °C (OR = 5.462; 95% CI = 2.161–13.805), and intraoperative prone position (OR = 3.354; 95% CI = 1.386–8.115) were statistically significant risk factors for the development of pressure ulcers.ConclusionAccording to our preoperative pressure ulcer risk assessment, it is very important to take additional protective measures both during and after surgical operations to prevent pressure ulcers.     

Monitoring the biomechanical and physiological effects of postural changes during leisure chair sitting

BackgroundIndividuals with limited mobility can spend prolonged periods in leisure chairs, increasing their risk of developing a seated acquired pressure ulcer. The present study aims to use objective measures of posture and tissue viability to identify the associated risks of leisure chair related pressure ulcers.MethodsHealthy participants (n = 13) were recruited to sit on a leisure chair with either a viscoelastic foam or air cushion. Participants were asked to adopt four different postures for a period of 10 min followed by a 10 min refractory period. Measurements at the leisure chair-participant interface included interface pressure, transcutaneous tissue gas tensions at the ischial tuberosities, accelerometer data collected from the sternum and subjective comfort levels.ResultsResults indicated that interface pressures remained consistent, with peak pressure index values of less than 60 mmHg across all conditions. A proportion of participants exhibited decreased oxygen tensions associated with increased carbon dioxide tensions during one or more test condition. This was particularly prevalent during the right lean posture on the air cushion (46%). In all cases, normal tissue viability was restored during standing. The accelerometer was able to detect significant changes (p < 0.05) in relative trunk angles during slump and right lean when compared to optimal sitting posture.ConclusionCommercially available leisure chairs have little evidence to support their pressure relieving properties. This study revealed that a proportion of healthy individuals demonstrated a compromised tissue viability in specific postures. Further research is required to assess the impact of these sitting conditions in vulnerable individuals.     

The impact of hoist sling fabrics on interface pressure whilst sitting in healthy volunteers and wheelchair users: A comparative study

Aim of the studyTo evaluate the effect of three sling fabrics on gluteal interface pressure whilst sitting in a population of wheelchair users and to compare these to data previously collected in a pilot study with a healthy population.Materials and methodsA repeated measures experimental design was used with 32 adult wheelchair users (15 women, 17 men). Healthy population pilot study consisted of 61 participants (51 women, 10 men) recruited from staff and students at The University of Salford.MethodsGluteal pressures at six pressure zones were recorded using the X-sensor PX100 pressure sensor at 30 s intervals for 10 min. Data were collected in 4 conditions with participants seated in a standardised chair, followed by the chair with slings made of three different fabrics.ResultsThe spacer fabric reduced the mean gluteal pressure more effectively than slipfit and polyester (p = 0.014 and p = 0.01 respectively, 95%CI) and reduced peak pressure at the left ischial tuberosity and coccyx when compared to the slipfit (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005) with the wheelchair users. When comparing data with the pilot study, the mean gluteal pressure and peak pressures at the ischial tuberosities and coccyx were significantly higher in the wheelchair user group (p < 0.005).ConclusionThe fabric identified as the most effective in reducing mean and peak pressures in both groups was the spacer fabric, suggesting that a spacer fabric sling is more likely to reduce the risk of pressure ulcer development.This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.     

Once daily 300 mg aspirin with compression versus compression alone in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (ASPiVLU): A randomised,double-blinded,multicentre, placebo-controlled,clinical trial

AimVenous leg ulcers are lower limb skin ulcers characterised by a cycle of healing and recurrence due to underlying chronic venous insufficiency. While compression improves healing outcomes, many ulcers do not heal. As a daily 300 mg oral dose of aspirin in conjunction with compression may improve healing outcomes, we investigated the effect of adjuvant aspirin on venous leg ulcer healing in participants already receiving compression.Materials and methodsWe conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (known as ASPiVLU). Participants were recruited from six wound clinics in Australia. We screened 844 participants. Community-dwelling adult participants identified at six hospital outpatient clinics and clinically diagnosed with a venous leg ulcer present for 6+ weeks were eligible between April 13, 2015 to June 30, 2018. We randomised 40 participants (n = 19 aspirin, n = 21 placebo) and evaluated against the primary outcome. There were no dropouts. Ten serious adverse events in six participants were recorded. None were study related. The primary outcome measure was healing at 12 weeks based on blinded assessment.ResultsWe found no difference in the number of ulcers healed at 12 weeks between the intervention and control groups.ConclusionThis study could not detect whether or not aspirin affected VLU healing speed. This is likely because we recruited fewer participants than expected due to the high number of people with venous leg ulcers in Australia who were already taking Aspirin; future research should investigate other adjuvant therapies or different study designs.     

The knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention among healthcare support workers in the UK: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundPressure ulcers cause significant, detrimental effects on personal wellbeing. They represent a serious health and social care burden. Nurses and those working in support roles are primarily accountable for preventing pressure ulcers. Healthcare support workers are an expanding group of key workers in the UK.ObjectiveTo examine healthcare support workers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2020 to June 2021, using Knowledge and Attitudes toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention Assessment Tool.ResultsA total of 164 participants completed the questionnaire fully. A low mean knowledge score of 0.42 ± 0.14, but a positive attitude score of 0.76 ± 0.10 per item were reported. The weakest areas of knowledge include aetiology, risk assessment and addressing pressure-reducing interventions for patients at risk. Higher mean scores per item in knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were reported in participants working in acute hospital wards and nursing homes (0.468 ± 0.15, 0.47 ± 0.08 respectively) than those in other settings (p < 0.05). Participants working in primary care scored lowest (0.33 ± 0.12). The scores of participants with more positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention significantly correlated with higher score of knowledge (p < 0.005).ConclusionWhile positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention exist among healthcare support workers, this is overshadowed by significant knowledge deficits. Findings highlight the importance of continuing structured education for support workers across both acute and community settings. A future national survey and interventional study are needed to examine support workers’ pressure ulcer knowledge and to inform a national continuous education strategy.     

Comparison of interface pressures in two dynamic pressure ulcer prevention supports (NIMBUS 3 and SUMMIT): A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPressure ulcers are a risk for bedridden patients and various supports exist to prevent them. The Pressure Relief Index (PRI) evaluates pressure relief of dynamic mattresses over time. This study compared the PRI of the SUMMIT mattress (AKS-France) and the NIMBUS 3 (HNE Medical).MethodsIn this non-blinded, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority study, patients aged ≥60 with a BMI of 16–35 kg/m2, predominantly confined to bed, able to walk with aid and with pelvic symmetry were recruited from a hospital rehabilitation department from March–April 2012. Exclusion criteria included past or present pressure ulcers, inability to remain supine and deep vein thrombosis. Peak pressures of the sacrum were recorded at 0.1 Hz during a single complete 10-min inflating cycle on both mattresses, with the order determined via electronic randomization allocation.ResultsThirty-one subjects were included and randomized; with 14 finally analyzed in the SUMMIT-NIBMUS 3 order group and 16 in the NIMBUS 3-SUMMIT group. The difference in PRI <30 mmHg between the two mattresses was 13.2% [0.3–26.1] (p < 0.05), allowing a non-inferiority - superiority switch. The SUMMIT mattress demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of time <30 mmHg (p = 0.0454). No significant difference in mean minimal pressure was seen (p = 0.3231) and mean maximal pressure was in favor of SUMMIT mattress (p = 0.0096). BMI did not affect pressure profile. There were no adverse events.ConclusionsEvaluated by the PRI, the SUMMIT mattress had a better interface pressure profile than the NIMBUS 3 in older patients. The PRI is a promising tool for clinical decision-making and research, warranting validation.     

Effects of cycle periods and pressure amplitudes of alternating pressure on sacral skin blood flow responses

BackgroundThere are no guidelines on selecting alternating pressure (AP) configurations on increasing sacral skin blood flow (SBF).AimThe specific aims were to compare different cycle periods and pressure amplitudes of AP on sacral SBF responses in healthy people to establish the efficacy and safety of the protocols.MethodsTwo studies were tested, including the cycle period study (8 2.5-min vs 4 5-min protocols) and the pressure amplitude study (75/5 vs 65/15 mmHg protocols). Sacral SBF was measured using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in 20 participants. AP loads were randomly applied using an indenter through the rigid LDF probe. Each protocol included a 10-min baseline, 20-min AP and 10-min recovery periods. A 30-min washout period was provided. The SBF response was normalized to the baseline SBF of each condition of each participant.ResultsFor the cycle period study, the 4 5-min cycle protocol partially restored more SBF than the 8 2.5-min cycle protocol at the low-pressure phase (0.87 ± 0.04 vs 0.71 ± 0.03, p < 0.05) and at the high-pressure phase (0.25 ± 0.03 vs 0.19 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). For the pressure amplitude study, the 75/5 mmHg protocol partially restored more sacral SBF than the 65/15 mmHg protocol at the low-pressure phase (0.87 ± 0.1 vs 0.25 ± 0.03, p < 0.05) but not at the high-pressure phase (0.23 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02, non-significant).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that 1) a cycle period of 5 min was better than 2.5 min and 2) a pressure amplitude of 75/5 mmHg was better than 65/15 mmHg. The finding provides insights for selecting the AP configurations for increasing SBF.     

The effect of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle on nursing workload costs

AimThis study investigated the effect of care under the guidance of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle on pressure ulcer incidence rates and on nursing workload costs.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective pre-post interventional study was conducted in an anesthesia and reanimation intensive care unit. The sample consisted of 16 nurses and 84 patients.MethodsThe study was conducted in two periods: (1) nursing workload of pre-care bundle period and (2) nursing workload of post-care bundle period. In the collection of data, 6 forms (the demographic data forms, the Braden scale, nurse information form, the care bundle follow-up form and nursing workload follow-up form) were administered. The main outcomes of the study; Pressure ulcer incidence rate was evaluated with Form V, and nursing workload costs were evaluated with Form VI. These forms were evaluated daily by the nurses. In the first period (15.09.2018–30.11.2018), pressure ulcer incidence rates and nursing workload costs were evaluated before training. Then, the researcher trained nurses on how to prevent pressure ulcers and use the care bundle. The care bundles components were risk assessment, skincare, activity, in-service training, nutrition, wetness/incontinence and support surface management, and keeping records. In the second period (01.12.2018–15.02.2019), pressure ulcer incidence rates and nursing workload costs were evaluated after the training. The outcomes of the two periods regarding the incidence of pressure ulcers and nursing workload costs were compared.ResultsThe pressure ulcer incidence rates before and after the care bundle were 22.1 and 13.0 per 100 patient-day, respectively. There was a decrease in pressure ulcer incidence rates after the care bundle, but it wasn't significant (p = 0.138). The total workload cost of pressure ulcer prevention was significantly lower after the care bundle than before (p = 0.001).ConclusionThe pressure ulcer incidence rates were lower after the care bundle than before, albeit insignificantly. The total pressure ulcer prevention workload costs were significantly lower after the care bundle than before. The reduction in pressure ulcer incidence and workload cost indicates that the use of care bundle is effective. Healthcare professionals in intensive care units should use a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle more often.     

Determination of medical device-related pressure injury in COVID-19 patients: A prospective descriptive study

BackgroundCOVID-19 patients are at risk for the development of pressure injuries (PI).AimThe aim of this study was to determine the incidence of medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in patients treated in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU)s.MethodsThe sample of the study consisted of 132 patients, and each with a maximum follow-up of 7 days. Data were collected in the COVID-19 ICU of a university hospital between January and May 2021 by using a Patient Characteristics Form, the MDRPI Follow-up Form, the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale, and the Pressure Ulcer Staging Form.ResultsOf the patients, 59.1% (n = 78) developed at least one MDRPI. MRDPI was observed in those with a mean age of 65.45 ± 2.462 years who were invasively ventilated (51.3%), enterally fed (46.2%), placed in the prone position (78.2%), and had a Braden score ≤12 (50%). The most common medical devices that caused MDRPIs included endotracheal tube (ET) (31.2% n = 44), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIVM) (23.4% n = 33), nasal high-flow (11.3% n = 16), nasogastric tube (10.6% n = 15), the ET connection (8.5% n = 12), respectively. The most common sites for pressure injuries were the nose (28.8% n = 34), mouth (25.8% n = 34), ear (12.9% n = 17), lip (9.1% n = 12), and cheek (8.3% n = 11). The most common gradings of MDRPIs were stage 2 (28.8% n = 38), stage 1 (19.7% n = 26), stage 3 (9.1% n = 12) mucous membrane injuries (12.9% n = 17) and suspected deep tissue injuries (9.1% n = 12), respectively. The time to PI was 3 days (25.7% n = 36).ConclusionsMDRPI was common among COVID-19 patients. It was found that the most common cause of pressure injury was ventilators, and PI developed in the mouth and lip sites most frequently in patients in prone position, stage 2 and suspected deep tissue damage was the most common grade. It is important to evaluate the skin in contact with medical devices in COVID-19 patients and to take the necessary interventions to prevent PI.     

A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients

BackgroundData on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (PU's) among ICU patients is sparse.ObjectiveTo compare PU outcomes in medial ICU patients nursed on either a reactive mattress overlay (ROHO^®, ROHO Inc, Belleville, IL, USA) or an active alternating pressure mattress (NIMBUS^®3, ArjoHuntleigh, Luton Bedfordshire, UK).DesignPilot prospective single blind randomised controlled clinical trial.InterventionTwo types of pressure redistributing mattress.PatientsTwo groups of eight patients.MethodsPatients included in the study were those at high risk (Norton scale <8) or with a PU on admission.ResultsThe two groups had similar patient characteristics. However, the NIMBUS 3 group presented with more ulcers per patient on admission (62.5%) and more severe ulcers (20% category 3) while four patients (50%) presented with a single superficial ulcer in the ROHO group.HealingThe progress of the ulcers showed significant decreases in PU surface area (p = 0.05), total PUSH tool score (p = 0.01) in the NIMBUS 3 group compared to the ROHO group. In the NIMBUS 3 group 82% of the ulcers improved versus none in the ROHO group (p = 0.002) and 18% remained stable versus 33%. None of the ulcers deteriorated in the NIMBUS 3 group versus 67% in the ROHO group (p = 0.006). Full thickness wounds (Category 3) were present in 22% of the NIMBUS 3 group versus 0% of the ROHO group on admission and in 0% versus 66.7% (p = 0.008) respectively at the end of the pilot study.PreventionNon-blanching erythema occurred equally in both arms at baseline; skin remained intact for the NIMBUS 3 group while 50% in the ROHO group worsened with superficial tissue loss.ConclusionThis small pilot study suggests that ‘active’ alternating therapy is a useful adjunct in the care of highly vulnerable patients, while the outcomes may be less favourable when using ‘reactive’, constant low pressure devices.     

Sacral interface pressure can be alleviated by repositioning with a small-angle change using an automated bed in patients with spinal cord injury

Aim of the studyThis study aimed to compare interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region in different positions, including small-angle changes, in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Furthermore, we analyzed the clinical factors influencing pressure to identify the pressure injury (PI) high-risk group.Materials and methodsAn intervention was conducted for patients with paraplegia (n = 30) with SCI. In the first and second trials, interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region were recorded from large- and small-angled positions using the automatic repositioning bed, which can change the angle of the back, lateral tilt, and knee.ResultsPositions with back raised ≥45° showed significantly higher pressure on the sacrum than most other positions. The pressure and contact area differences were statistically insignificant for combinations of small-angled changes <30°.Additionally, the duration of injury (β = 0.51, p = 0.010) and neurological level of injury (NLI) (β = −0.47, p = 0.020) were significant independent predictors of average pressure. Similarly, the duration of injury (β = 0.64, p = 0.001), the Korean version of the spinal cord independence measure-III (β = −0.52, p = 0.017), and body mass index (BMI; β = −0.34, p = 0.041) were significant independent predictors of peak pressure.ConclusionsFor repositioning, combinations of small-angle changes <30° effectively reduce pressure on the sacral region in patients with SCI. Lower BMI, longer duration of injury, lower functioning score, and NLI ≥ T7 are predictors of high sacral pressures, which increase the risk for PI. Therefore, patients with these predictors require strict management.     

Feasibility of a repositioning schedule on pressure ulcer prevention in a French Intensive Care Unit: A pre and post-intervention pilot study

AimsAs a prerequisite of a multicentre study, we conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a daily repositioning schedule in critically ill patients. The schedule was adapted to the patient's clinical condition, and the estimated risk for developing a pressure ulcer using the Braden scale.DesignA single-center pre and post-intervention pilot study in a French Intensive Care Unit of a university teaching hospital. This study followed TREND guidelines.MethodsDuring the first period (March to May 2018), pressure ulcer prevention was performed according to usual care. During the second period (June to August 2018), the repositioning schedule was adapted to the estimated risk for developing a pressure ulcer according to the Braden scale. Eligible patients had no pressure ulcer at baseline, were intubated within 24 hours of admission and expected to receive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours. The primary outcome was the rate of pressure ulcer development at 28 days of hospitalization or at discharge or death, as compared with usual care. Secondary outcomes included the feasibility and safety of the schedule, as assessed by caregivers’ adherence and workload, and the rate of adverse events.ResultsIn the pre-intervention period 20 participants were included, and 14 patients were included in the post-intervention period. There was no decrease in the pressure ulcers incidence with the intervention (25% vs. 28.6%; P = 1). The number of daily repositioning performed increased from 3.3 [IQR 3.0; 3.9] during the pre-intervention period to 4.3 [IQR 3.8; 5.2] during the post-intervention period (P < 0.05), where it differed from the number scheduled by 0.6 [IQR 0.1; 1.4] per day, indicating satisfactory adherence of caregivers to the protocol. Adverse events rate did not differ between the two periods (55.9% vs. 57.1%; P = 0.90).ConclusionA personalised daily repositioning schedule in critically ill patients is feasible and safe. The efficacy of such a strategy, together with its economic impact, need to be assessed in a multicentre randomized trial.     

Determination of the effect of prophylactic dressing on the prevention of skin injuries associated with personal protective equipments in health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic

AimThe present study was carried out as a comparative observational study in order to determine the effect of prophylactic dressing on the prevention of skin injuries due to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) working with COVID-19 patients. In addition, the effect of nasal strip on the prevention of discomfort in breathing with mask was also investigated.Materials and methodsThe present study was carried out with 48 HCWs (Control Group-CG, n = 20; Experimental Group 1-EG1, n = 20; Experimental Group 2-EG2, n = 8) who use PPE on the face region and work with COVID-19 patients. Data was collected with Data Collection Form developed by researchers. In participants in CG, normal procedures of the institution in using PPE were followed. In EG1, prophylactic dressing was used on risky areas on the face. In EG2, nasal strip sticky on one side was used in addition to prophylactic dressing. The evaluation of the facial skin was made once a day by a researcher with expertise in wound management.ResultsGroups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics of participants. Overall rate of skin injuries associated with PPE use was 47.9%. Skin injuries developed in all participants in CG (n = 20), and in two and one participants in EG1 and EG2 respectively, with significant difference between groups. The most common skin injuries were Stage 1 pressure injury (29.2%), blanchable erythema of intact skin (27.1%) and itching (18.8%). No participant in EG2 reported discomfort in breathing (n = 8). Significant difference was found between groups in favor of EG2 in terms of experiencing discomfort in breathing (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn the present study, it was established that using prophylactic dressing under PPE prevents skin injuries on the facial skin and using nasal strip prevents discomfort in breathing with mask. In view of these results, it was recommended that prophylactic dressing should be used under PPE.     

Seated buttocks anatomy and its impact on biomechanical risk

AimThe objective of this study was to describe the amount, types, and shapes of tissue present in the buttocks during sitting (i.e., seated buttocks soft tissue anatomy), and the impact of seated buttocks soft tissue anatomy on biomechanical risk.Materials and methodsThe buttocks of 35 people, including 29 full-time wheelchair users with and without a history of pelvic pressure ulcers were scanned sitting upright on 3” of flat HR45 foam in a FONAR Upright MRI. Multi-planar scans were analyzed to calculate bulk tissue thickness, tissue composition, gluteus maximus coverage at the ischium, the contour of the skin, and pelvic tilt.ResultsBulk tissue thickness varied from 5.6 to 32.1 mm, was composed mostly of adipose tissue, and was greatest in the able-bodied cohort. Skin contours varied significantly across status group, with wheelchair users with a history of pressure ulcers having tissue with a peaked contour with a radius of curvature of 65.9 mm that wrapped more closely to the ischium (thickness at the apex = 8.2 mm) as compared to wheelchair users with no pressure ulcer history (radius of curvature = 91.5 mm and apex thickness = 14.5 mm). Finally, the majority of participants presented with little to no gluteus coverage over their ischial tuberosity, regardless of status group.ConclusionsThis study provides quantitative evidence that Biomechanical Risk, or the intrinsic characteristic of an individual's soft tissues to deform in response to extrinsic applied forces, is greater in individuals at greater risk for pressure ulcers.     

Effectiveness of a foot self-management intervention that utilized commercially available infrared thermometers: Mixed methods research incorporating a pilot RCT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a foot self-management strategy that utilized a commercially-available infrared thermometer (CAIT) for prevention of diabetic foot ulcers.Research Design and MethodsIn this six-month pilot randomized controlled trial, Phase 2 of a three-phase mixed methods research study, 62 participants were randomized to a thermometer and education group (n = 34) and an education-only group (n = 26). Both groups received foot care education and were assessed by a certified orthotist. All participants recorded their number of steps and recorded a foot assessment in a logbook daily. The thermometer and education group also recorded their daily temperature assessment. A temperature difference of >4° Fahrenheit (F) between the two feet prompted participants to rest their feet. Participants were directed to see their healthcare provider if the temperature difference did not decrease to below 4° F in two days. Phase 3 of the study explored the Phase 2 results to understand the findings further.ResultsThe strategy improved foot assessment and action: the thermometer and education group had significantly more days with any assessment completed than the education-only group (150.98/180 vs. 119.84/180, p = 0.02). Phase 3 findings showed that the thermometer engaged participants, prompted action, and offered reassurance regarding foot health.ConclusionsA CAIT is a tool that could support foot self-management and may offer several benefits, such as promoting and providing structure for a foot assessment and direction for action.Clinical trial reg noNCT0306776 clinicaltrials.gov.     

Preventing recurrence after surgical repair of pressure injuries in patients with spinal cord injury: Effects of a presurgical and postsurgical wheelchair seating intervention by experts

ObjectivePressure injuries in people with spinal cord injury or dysfunction (SCI/D) are known to have a high recurrence rate. As a countermeasure, we perform surgery after adjusting the wheelchair and cushion with the intervention of a seating expert. The effectiveness of seating interventions in postsurgical recurrence prevention was examined.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective analysis, the participants were 19 patients with SCI/D who underwent pressure injury surgical treatment in the gluteal region from 2005 to 2018. The patients with conventional rehabilitation were assigned to Group 1 (n = 8), and those with seating intervention by experts in addition to conventional rehabilitation were assigned to Group 2 (n = 11). The main outcome measure was the presence or absence of recurrence 3 years after the surgery. The recurrence rate was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe recurrence rates were 18% with seating intervention and 75% without; there was a significant difference (p = 0.025). The recurrence odds ratio was 13.5.ConclusionThis study suggests that presurgical seating evaluation and assessment by experts, postsurgical rehabilitation based on presurgical evaluation and assessment, and routine follow-up and seating adjustment according to changes are efficacious for preventing postsurgical pressure injury recurrence in patients with SCI/D.     

Design and evaluation of a dynamic air cushion for pressure ulcers prevention

Wheelchair users have a higher risk of developing pressure ulcers due to prolonged seated pressure. Pressure ulcers can be painful, may require surgical intervention, and even become life-threatening if infection occurs. To prevent pressure ulcers from forming the patient must either offload themselves or rely on a caregiver to move them allowing pressure redistribution over the seated area. In this work, we designed a dynamic air cushion to relieve pressure on loaded areas using sequences of inflation and deflation of the air cushion cells. The purpose of these sequences is to offload pressure from high-risk areas. To evaluate the effect of the alternating sequences on seated pressure and blood perfusion, we recorded interface pressure, skin blood flow, superficial tissue oxygen saturation, blood concentrations of oxygenated hemoglobin, and deoxygenated hemoglobin from twenty-one healthy volunteers who were asked to sit on the air cushion for static mode recording (3 min) and during the inflation/deflation sequences (up to 22 min). The alternating sequences consisted of ten combined inflation and deflation steps. Results showed that, after applying the alternating sequences, interface pressure reduced significantly $(p=0.02)$ compared to the static mode. Moreover, the coefficient of variation of the seated pressure was higher ($p<0.001)$ during the alternation sequence compared to the static mode. However, interface pressure under the right and left ischial tuberosities increased ($p<0.001)$ during the alternation sequence compared to the static mode. In addition, during the alternating sequences, males had larger dispersion index values of both right and left ischial tuberosities pressure compared to females. Furthermore, the maximum value of oxygen saturation ($p=0.04$) and skin blood flow ($p=0.001$) increased during the pressure alternation sequences compared to the static mode. The study findings highlighted the positive effects of the designed dynamic air-cushion to relieve pressure on compressed areas and enhance blood perfusion similar to manual offloading approaches. The outcomes of this study are encouraging to evaluate the performance of the designed air cushion in studies involving wheelchair users.