Accuracy of mandible-independent maxillary repositioning using pre-bent locking plates: a pilot study

The double splint method is considered the gold standard for maxillary repositioning, but the procedure is lengthy and prone to error. Recent splintless methods have shown high repositioning accuracy; however, high costs and technical demands make them inaccessible to many patients. Therefore, a new cost-effective method of mandible-independent maxillary repositioning using pre-bent locking plates is proposed. Plates are bent on maxillary models in the planned position prior to surgery. The locations of the plate holes are replicated during surgery using osteotomy guides made from thermoplastic resin sheets. Pre-bent plates are subsequently fitted onto the maxilla, and plate holes are properly set to reposition the maxilla. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this method for maxillary repositioning and the reproducibility of the plate holes. Fifteen orthognathic surgery patients were evaluated retrospectively by superimposing preoperative simulations over their postoperative computed tomography models. The median deviations in maxillary repositioning and plate hole positioning between the preoperative plan and postoperative results were 0.43 mm (range 0–1.55 mm) and 0.33 mm (range 0–1.86 mm), respectively. There was no significant correlation between these deviations, suggesting that the method presented here allows highly accurate and reliable mandible-independent maxillary repositioning.     

Accuracy of maxillary repositioning in two-jaw surgery with conventional articulator model surgery versus virtual model surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of maxillary repositioning using the recently introduced computerized virtual model surgery (VMS) with conventional articulator model surgery (AMS). Forty-two patients who had undergone bimaxillary surgery were investigated retrospectively in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: conventional AMS (n = 23) and VMS (n = 19) for intermediate splint fabrication in maxillary positioning. Planned surgical movements and actual postsurgical changes of the lateral and frontal cephalometric measurements were compared. Although variations from the planned surgical movements were relatively small, both methods had statistically significant errors in some of the linear measurements. Both groups had a similar range of errors. The overall absolute mean discrepancy between the planned and actual surgical movements for the linear measurements was 1.17 mm (0–3.6 mm) in AMS and 0.95 mm (0–3.2 mm) in VMS. Of the total measurements, measurements reflecting a surgical discrepancy of more than 2 mm or 2° comprised 12.0% of the cases in AMS and 7.9% in VMS. The surgical accuracy of maxillary positioning with VMS was comparable to conventional AMS. Because VMS has the definitive advantage of eliminating the complex laboratory step and shortening the laboratory time, this can be accepted as an alternative to AMS.     

Postoperative skeletal stability and accuracy of a new combined Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy for superior repositioning of the maxilla

Postoperative skeletal stability and accuracy were evaluated in a combination of Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomies for superior repositioning of maxilla in bi-maxillary surgeries in 19 consecutive patients. 9 underwent Le Fort I osteotomy alone (preoperative planned superior movement <3.5 mm). 10 underwent Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy (combination group) (preoperative planned superior movement >3.5 mm). The maxilla was osteotomized and fixed with 4 titanium Le Fort plates followed by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible, fixed with 2 semi-rigid titanium miniplates. Maxillomandibular fixation was performed for 1 week. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, 3, 6, 12 months later. The changes in point A, point of maxillary tuberosity, and upper molar mesial cusp tip were examined. Discrepancy between the planned and measured superior movement of the maxilla in the Le Fort I and combination groups was 0.30 and 0.23 mm, respectively. The maxillae in both groups were repositioned close to their planned positions during surgery. 1 year later, both groups showed skeletal stability with no significant postoperative changes. When high superior repositioning of the maxilla is indicated, horseshoe osteotomy combined with Le Fort I is reliable and useful for accuracy and postoperative stability.     

Reaching the vertical versus horizontal target position in multi-segmental Le Fort I osteotomy is more difficult,but yields comparably stable results to one-segment osteotomy

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the postoperative outcomes of preoperatively planned positional changes for Le Fort I osteotomy in 77 patients (average age 26.6 years). Movement relapse and planning accuracy were evaluated by lateral cephalometric analysis, with an average follow-up of 257 days. In one-segment osteotomy cases, 73% of the horizontal movements were positioned within 2 mm of the surgical plan. With posterior–inferior repositioning of the maxilla, results fell within 2 mm of the prescribed plan in 60% of cases. Maxillary advancement and superior repositioning proved more stable than inferior maxillary repositioning. Relapse did not differ between three-piece and one-piece osteotomies for any movements; however, in three-piece cases, only half of the positional changes on average stayed within 2 mm of the prescribed surgical plan. Relapse did not vary with bone grafting among the groups. To summarize, in most Le Fort I osteotomy cases, the surgical plan is achieved within 2 mm, with posterior extrusion of the maxilla showing the greatest deviation both in reaching the target and maintaining the result achieved. Although maxillary segmentation makes the surgical plan more difficult to achieve, the results are at least as stable as those of one-piece osteotomies.     

Splintless orthognathic surgery in edentulous patients—a pilot study

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictability of a splintless treatment protocol for edentulous patients undergoing orthognathic surgery in four consecutive cases. All operations were virtually planned, followed by computer-aided design of individual osteotomy guides and patient-specific fixation implants, which were three-dimensionally printed in titanium. In order to evaluate the discrepancy between the planned and the achieved postoperative result, the postoperative outcome was compared to the virtual treatment plan. Rotational and translational movement and discrepancies with the planned movements were quantified for the maxilla; the advancement was quantified for the mandible. For the maxilla, there was a mean translation discrepancy of 0.6 mm. With regard to rotation, there was a mean discrepancy of 1.9°, 0.1°, and 0.4° for pitch, yaw, and roll, respectively. The mean discrepancy in translation of the mandible was 0.4 mm. The results of this pilot study indicate that the splintless treatment protocol for orthognathic surgery in edentulous patients presented here is accurate and predictable.     

Precision of maxillary repositioning during orthognathic surgery: A prospective study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of surgical splints and an external reference point to reposition the maxilla during orthognathic surgery. Before surgery, a radiological marker was inserted inside the orthodontic bracket of the first right maxillary molar. A surgical splint was utilized to reposition the maxilla in the sagittal and coronal planes after the osteotomy. The vertical position was established by measuring the distance between a Kirschner wire inserted at bony nasion and the orthodontic wire. Preoperative and postoperative cephalometric radiographs were obtained and manually traced. The radiological marker and the tip of the right maxillary incisor were used as specific landmarks. Their displacement on the pre- and postoperative radiographs was measured. The actual surgical movement of the maxilla was compared to the initial surgical planning. 23 patients met the inclusion criteria to participate in the study. The mean difference between the planned and executed movements of the maxilla was 0.1 mm (p = 0.71). The difference was not statistically significant for any given movements of the maxilla. The use of surgical splints made from model surgery combined with an external reference point at bony nasion is accurate methods for repositioning the maxilla during orthognathic surgery.     

Custom made cutting guides and osteosynthesis plates versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in positioning and fixation of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized study

The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of maxilla positioning in orthognathic surgery with the use of custom-made devices (cutting guides and patient-fitted osteosynthesis plates) comparing to CAD/CAM splints.A prospective randomized study was performed. Patients with dentofacial deformities undergoing orthognathic surgery were compared, using customized guides (experimental group) vs. CAD/CAM surgical splints (control group) for the repositioning of the upper maxilla. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were used to compare positioning and fixation of the maxilla in the three planes of space.A total of 30 patients were included in the study (15 patients in each study group). The mean error obtained with customized guides was 0.8 mm (range 0.1–1.9) in the anterior-posterior axis, 0.4 mm (range 0–1.4) in the vertical axis and 0.2 mm (range 0–1.1) in the horizontal axis. There were statistically significant differences in the anterior-posterior and vertical axes in favour of the customized implants, whereas there were no differences in the horizontal plane. Furthermore, there was a mean reduction of the operative time of 36.5 min in the experimental group.Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient specific surgical guides should be preferred when accuracy of repositioning of the maxilla and saving operative time are the priority.     

Do patient-specific cutting guides and plates improve the accuracy of maxillary repositioning in hemifacial microsomia?

The aim of this retrospective study was to use computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) patient-specific plates and cutting guides for the waferless positioning and fixation of the maxilla after bimaxillary osteotomies in cases of hemifacial microsomia with condylar dysplasia or absence of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and to compare the results with the CAD/CAM fabricated surgical wafer by 3-dimensional analysis. Eighteen patients were selected from the hospital database, preoperative surgical planning and simulation were done on 3-dimensional computed tomographic models for all patients, and they were divided into Group I – in which CAD/CAM patient-specific cutting guides and plates were used; and Group II – in which CAD/CAM fabricated surgical wafers were used. Finally, the outcome was evaluated by comparing planned with postoperative outcomes. The largest discrepancies of the Le Fort I segment were 0.50 (0.18) mm in the anteroposterior direction and 0.82 (0.60)° in the yaw orientation with Group I. The largest discrepancies of the Le Fort I segment were 1.32 (1.40) mm in superioinferior direction and 8.48 (7.73)° in the yaw orientation with Group II. The CAD/CAM patient-specific cutting guides and plates proved to be reliable and have great value in improving the accuracy in repositioning the Le Fort I segment and in the efficacy of orthognathic treatment of hemifacial microsomia with condylar dysplasia or no TMJ. The CAD/CAM patient-specific cutting guides and plates are therefore a useful alternative to the wafer technique.     

Does a learning curve exist for accuracy in three-dimensional planning for maxillary positioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of time, and experience, on the accuracy of maxillary repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery performed using virtual surgical planning (VSP). Patients who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery were reviewed. Maxillary position on pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans was compared. The patients were divided into groups according to the year in which VSP was performed and surgery completed. Linear distances between upper jaw reference landmarks were measured in all three planes of space to determine accuracy between the preoperative VSP and the surgical outcome at various time points. One hundred subjects met the eligibility criteria for assessment and were allocated to groups: 2013 (n = 10), 2014 (n = 17), 2015 (n = 39), 2016 (n = 20), and 2017 (n = 14). Overall, the results demonstrated improved precision in maxillary position over the years, with more accurate results in patients who underwent surgery in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Mean linear differences between planned and obtained results demonstrated more accurate results in the horizontal direction, followed by transverse and vertical directions. An overall average difference within 1 mm was observed for 51.3% of the measurements included in the sample group. Time, and surgeon experience, can influence the accuracy of maxillary positioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.     

Accuracy of Le Fort I osteotomy in bimaxillary splint-based orthognathic surgery: focus on posterior maxillary movements

This retrospective study was performed to verify the accuracy of horizontal and vertical repositioning of the maxilla in bimaxillary osteotomy with a focus on posterior vertical displacement. Data from 39 orthognathic patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery including a one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy with pitch rotation and advancement at the University Hospitals of Leuven (Belgium), between January 2015 and April 2016, were included in the study. Preoperative and 1-week postoperative lateral cephalograms were digitized and imported into cephalometric software. Horizontal and vertical measurements of dental landmarks were used to assess the accuracy of maxillary repositioning, and errors were reported in terms of the mean and absolute mean. The horizontal advancements were randomly under- and over-corrected an average of 1.4 mm ± 1.2 mm. Vertical repositioning of the anterior maxilla followed the planning. A tendency for under-correction was found for posterior vertical intrusion of the maxilla. The same tendency towards under-correction of posterior maxillary inferior repositioning was detected when planned movements were greater than 3 mm. For all studied groups, no significant difference was found between the planning and the results achieved, validating the use of intermediate splints.     

Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial

Data from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and optical scans (intraoral or model scanner) are required for computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS). This study compared the accuracy of implant position when placed with CAIS guides produced by intraoral and extraoral (model) scanning. Forty-seven patients received 60 single implants by means of CAIS. Each implant was randomly assigned to either the intraoral group (n = 30) (Trios Scanner, 3Shape) or extraoral group (n = 30), in which stereolithographic surgical guides were manufactured after conventional impression and extraoral scanning of the stone model (D900L Lab Scanner, 3Shape). CBCT and surface scan data were imported into coDiagnostiX software for virtual implant position planning and surgical guide design. Postoperative CBCT scans were obtained. Software was used to compare the deviation between the planned and final positions. Average deviation for the intraoral vs. model scan groups was 2.42° ± 1.47° vs. 3.23° ± 2.09° for implant angle, 0.87 ± 0.49 mm vs. 1.01 ± 0.56 mm for implant platform, and 1.10 ± 0.53 mm vs. 1.38 ± 0.68 mm for implant apex; there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CAIS conducted with stereolithographic guides manufactured by means of intraoral or extraoral scans appears to result in equal accuracy of implant positioning.     

Two-point nasomaxillary fixation of the Le Fort I osteotomy: assessment of stability at one year postoperative

The purpose was to assess maxillary position among patients undergoing Le Fort I maxillary advancement with internal fixation placed only at the nasomaxillary buttresses. This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing a Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement, with internal fixation placed only at the nasomaxillary buttresses. Demographic and cephalometric measures were recorded. The outcome of interest was the change in maxillary position between immediately postoperative (T1), 6 weeks postoperative (T2), and 1 year postoperative (T3). Fifty-eight patients were included as study subjects (32 male, 26 female; mean age 18.4 ± 1.8 years). Twenty-five subjects (43.1%) had a diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Forty-three subjects (74.1%) had bimaxillary surgery, 16 (27.6%) had bone grafts, and 18 (31.0%) had segmental maxillary osteotomies. At T3, there were no subjects with non-union, malunion, malocclusion, or relapse requiring repeat surgery. Mean linear changes between T1 and T3 were ≤1 mm. Mean angular changes between T1 and T3 were <1°. There was no significant difference in stability in multi-segment maxillary osteotomies (P =  0.22) or with bone grafting (P =  0.31). In conclusion, anterior fixation alone in the Le Fort I osteotomy results in a stable maxillary position at 1 year postoperative.     

Evaluating the accuracy of resection planes in mandibular surgery using a preoperative,intraoperative, and postoperative approach

In mandibular surgery, three-dimensionally printed patient-specific cutting guides are used to translate the preoperative virtually planned resection planes to the operating room. This study was performed to determine whether cutting guides are positioned according to the virtual plan and to compare the intraoperative position of the cutting guide with the resection performed. Nine patients were included. The exact positions of the resection planes were planned virtually and a patient-specific cutting guide was designed and printed. After surgical placement of the cutting guide, intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed. Postoperative CT was used to obtain the final resection planes. Distances and yaw and pitch angles between the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative resection planes were calculated. Cutting guides were positioned on the mandible with millimetre accuracy. Anterior osteotomies were performed more accurately than posterior osteotomies (intraoperatively positioned and final resection planes differed by 1.2 ± 1.0 mm, 4.9 ± 6.6°, and 1.8 ± 1.5°, respectively, and by 2.2 ± 0.9 mm, 9.3 ± 9°, and 8.3 ± 6.5° respectively). Differences between intraoperatively planned and final resection planes imply a directional freedom of the saw through the saw slots. Since cutting guides are positioned with millimetre accuracy compared to the virtual plan, the design of the saw slots in the cutting guides needs improvement to allow more accurate resections.     

Precision of orthognathic digital plan transfer using patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis versus mixed analogue–digitally planned surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Over the last decade, the accuracy of three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery has been investigated extensively. The absence of high-quality controlled trials, limited number of studies overall, and methodological flaws have hindered its use in general clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery compared to the classic occlusal wafers. Eighteen patients were randomly allocated to two groups: CAD/CAM splints and patient-specific osteosynthesis were used for maxillary positioning in group 1; occlusal wafers fabricated on a semi-adjustable articulator were used in group 2. Patients were assessed for linear and angular deviations of maxillary position from the virtual plan using cone beam computed tomography scans. The CAD/CAM group showed mean deviations of 0.26 mm vertically, 0.17 mm anteroposteriorly, and 0.07 mm mediolaterally, while the classic wafer group showed mean deviations of 1.45 mm vertically, 1.31 mm anteroposteriorly, and 0.71 mm mediolaterally. Statistical analysis showed that the proposed workflow provided a significantly more accurate plan transfer compared to classic occlusal wafers. Despite the statistical significance, the clinical significance was less appreciated. However, this new technology facilitated cases with skeletal asymmetry, reduced operating times, and allowed a trainee surgeon to perform the procedure with great accuracy and minimal time. The main limitation was the high cost.     

Accuracy of analytic model planning in bimaxillary surgery

The purpose of this study was to assess our method of analytic model planning in achieving a planned maxillary advancement for the correction of a dentofacial deformity. A consecutive series of 20 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, at a minimum, were included in the study group. For each study subject, consistent analytic model planning with splint fabrication was used to establish the desired horizontal repositioning of the maxilla. Using preoperative and 5-week postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs, an analysis was designed to assess the difference between the planned and actual advancement of the maxilla. The average difference between the planned and actual 5-week postsurgical advancement of the maxilla was 0.6 mm (range 0.2–1.0, P > 0.05). There was a strong correlation between the two data sets (R = 0.96). The results of the study indicate that the described method of analytic model planning is reliable (within 1 mm) in achieving the planned level of maxillary advancement in bimaxillary orthognathic procedures.     

Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA: Part 3: Inferior and anterior repositioning surgery

Having studied the effect of maxillary advancement and maxillary impaction in parts 1 and 2 of this research, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of different fixation models in inferiorly and anteriorly repositioned maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy. Two separate three-dimensional finite element models, simulating the inferiorly advanced maxilla at Le Fort I level, were used to compare 2- and 4-plate fixation. Model INF-2 resulted in 247 897 elements and 53 247 nodes and INF-4 consisted of 273 130 elements and 59 917 nodes. The stresses occurring in and around the bone and plate–screw complex were computed. The highest Von Mises stresses on the plates and maximum principal stresses on the bones were found in INF-2, especially under horizontal and oblique loads, when compared with INF-4. The present biomechanical study shows that the traditionally used 4-plate fixation technique, following Le Fort I inferior and anterior repositioning surgery, without bone grafting, provides fewer stress fields on the maxillary bones and fixation materials.     

Effect of computer-assisted design and manufacturing cutting and drilling guides accompanied with pre-bent titanium plates on the correction of skeletal class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial

This study was performed to assess the effect of correcting skeletal class II malocclusion based on the application of computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) cutting and drilling guides accompanied with pre-bent titanium plates. Fifty patients with skeletal class II malocclusion were recruited into this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial and assigned to two groups. Patients underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy directed by CAD/CAM cutting and drilling guides accompanied with pre-bent titanium plates (group A) or CAD/CAM splints (group B). Postoperative assessments were performed. Differences between the virtually simulated and postoperative models were measured. Patients in both groups had a satisfactory occlusion and appearance. More accurate repositioning of the proximal segment was found in group A than in group B when comparing linear and angular differences to reference planes; however, no significant difference was revealed for the distal segment. In conclusion, CAD/CAM cutting and drilling guides with pre-bent titanium plates can provide considerable surgical accuracy for the positional control of the proximal segments in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for the correction of skeletal class II deformities.     

Splintless surgery using patient-specific osteosynthesis in Le Fort I osteotomies: a randomized controlled multi-centre trial

The accuracy of orthognathic surgery has improved with three-dimensional virtual planning. The translation of the planning to the surgical result is reported to vary by >2 mm. The aim of this randomized controlled multi-centre trial was to determine whether the use of splintless patient-specific osteosynthesis can improve the accuracy of maxillary translation. Patients requiring a Le Fort I osteotomy were included in the trial. The intervention group was treated using patient-specific osteosynthesis and the control group with conventional osteosynthesis and splint-based positioning. Fifty-eight patients completed the study protocol, 27 in the patient-specific osteosynthesis group and 31 in the control group. The per protocol median anteroposterior deviation was found to be 1.05 mm (interquartile range (IQR) 0.45–2.72 mm) in the patient-specific osteosynthesis group and 1.74 mm (IQR 1.02–3.02 mm) in the control group. The cranial–caudal deviation was 0.87 mm (IQR 0.49–1.44 mm) and 0.98 mm (IQR 0.28–2.10 mm), respectively, whereas the left–right translation deviation was 0.46 mm (IQR 0.19–0.96 mm) in the patient-specific osteosynthesis group and 1.07 mm (IQR 0.62–1.55 mm) in the control group. The splintless patient-specific osteosynthesis method improves the accuracy of maxillary translations in orthognathic surgery and is clinically relevant for planned anteroposterior translations of more than 3.70 mm.     

Improvement in accuracy of maxillary repositioning of Le Fort I osteotomy with Orthopilot™ Navigation System: evaluation of 30 patients

Traditional model surgery with facebow transfer is not very accurate. We aimed to demonstrate that the Orthopilot™ Navigation System improves the accuracy of maxillary repositioning during Le Fort I osteotomy. Thirty patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy alone or associated to sagittal split osteotomy. The maxilla positioning was done in two phases. First, the maxilla was positioned with the traditional occlusal splint, the position (“without Orthopilot™”) was recorded by the Orthopilot™. In the second phase, the Orthopilot™ was used to improve positioning; and the final position (“with Orthopilot™”) was recorded, after osteosynthesis. Positioning data were compared with planned data. Positioning data with and without the Orthopilot™ were also compared. Accuracy was classified in distinct classes with three major criteria (conformity, non-conformity, failure) according to the discrepancies. Conformity rate was significantly greater with the Orthopilot™ (2 without the Orthopilot™ compared with 8 with the Orthopilot™; p = 0.01). The failure rate was significantly lower with the Orthopilot™ (18 without Orthopilot™ compared with 7 with the Orthopilot™; p = 0.002). Dispersions of discrepancies were usually lower in all directions with the Orthopilot™. Navigation reduced the risk of discrepancy without cancelling it, especially when large movements are planned. The Orthopilot™ therefore improved the accuracy of traditional occlusal splint during Le Fort I osteotomy.