Knotting of an epidural catheter: a rare complication

Knotting of an epidural catheter leading to entrapment is a rare complication of epidural catheterization. A lumbar epidural catheter inserted in a 28-year-old woman for caesarean section anesthesia and postoperative analgesia proved difficult to remove. After multiple attempts and placing the patient in the same position as when the catheter was initially inserted, the entrapped catheter was dislodged intact, revealing a double knot near its distal tip. Leaving catheters of less than 4 cm in length in the epidural space may help to avoid this complication. It is important the patient be informed of the techniques involved in the extraction of the resistant catheter because patient's cooperation is important for the nonsurgical removal of an entrapped epidural catheter.     

Management of the sheared epidural catheter: is surgical extraction really necessary?

Trauma to epidural catheters on insertion or removal may result in shearing or breakage. Although there is no evidence of neurologic sequelae from a sheared catheter, many reports still advocate eventual surgical removal. The literature suggests the following options: (1) using slow continuous force at all times; (2) discontinuing application of force if the catheter begins to stretch and reapplying traction several hours later; (3) placing of the patient in the same position as insertion; (4) placing the patient in the lateral decubitus position if possible; (5) attempting to remove in extreme flexion if the previous interventions are not efficacious; (6) attempting extension if flexion fails; (7) attempting removal after injection of preservative-free normal saline through the catheter; (8) considering use of a convex surgical frame; (9) considering computed tomographic scan to identify the etiology of entrapment; (10) considering leaving a retained epidural catheter in place in adult patients; (11) providing patient education regarding "red flags" to watch out for; and (12) neurosurgical consultation for all cases in which the catheter fragment is in the spinal canal.     

Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia: a new technique

A new technique is described for delivering combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. The disadvantages of the needle-through-needle technique and the two-needle techniques are discussed. The new technique is a modification of the two-needle technique. The spinal needle is introduced and once cerebrospinal fluid is seen at the hub of the needle, the stylet is replaced. The epidural space is then identified and the epidural catheter placed. The spinal needle obturator is then removed and intrathecal injection performed. This technique avoids problems associated with placing an epidural catheter after an intrathecal injection and the potential problem of placing a spinal needle when an epidural catheter has already been placed. This technique requires further evaluation.     

Stimulating thoracic epidural placement via a lumbar approach causes significant spinal cord damage in a porcine model

Background

Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia is a valuable and common technique for analgesia but involves risk to the spinal cord. There is significant pediatric experience safely placing thoracic epidurals via a caudal approach. The use of a stimulating catheter offers the advantage of real-time confirmation of appropriate catheter placement. We hypothesize that the tip of a stimulating epidural catheter can be reliably advanced to the thoracic epidural space with lumbar insertion in a porcine model.

Methods

This prospective experimental porcine study evaluated the feasibility of placing the tip of a stimulating epidural catheter to a predefined thoracic epidural location after percutaneous lumbar epidural access in six live pigs. After the lumbar epidural space was accessed, a stimulating epidural catheter was advanced until the targeted thoracic myotome was stimulated. The final position of the catheter in relation to the targeted location was determined by fluoroscopy. All animals were euthanized at the end of the experiment, necropsy and spinal cord histology were then performed to assess the extent of spinal cord damage.

Results

In all animals the epidural catheter tip could be accurately advanced to the targeted thoracic myotome. Gross subdural bleeding occurred in three of the six animals and deep spinal damage was observed in two of the six animals. In one animal, the catheter was placed in the subarachnoid space.

Conclusions

Accurate access to the thoracic epidural space is possible via a lumbar approach using a stimulating epidural catheter. Based on gross and histopathological examination, this technique resulted in frequent complications, including subdural hemorrhage, deep spinal cord damage, and subarachnoid catheter placement.     

The position of epidural catheters in obstetric regional anaesthesia.

The fate of plastic catheters threaded into the epidural space was studied radiographically in a total of 125 catheters in 75 patients. The longer the segment of catheter, the less likely it is to reach the intended position, because it may curl up or become deflected. The most reliable technique for accurately placing an epidural catheter at any specific level is to enter the epidural space as close as possible to that level, so that the catheter does not need to be threaded for more than 2--3 cm.     

Surgical removal of a looped and knotted epidural catheter in a postpartum patient--a case report

We report a case of unsuccessful removal of an epidural catheter in a postpartum patient following a labour epidural analgesia, which ultimately required surgical intervention and fenestration ligamentum flavum to remove the epidural catheter. A 26 year old, requested an epidural analgesia for her labour pain. The epidural catheter was inserted under aseptic technique, and she was comfortable throughout her labour and had a normal vaginal delivery 4 hours later. One hour later, the acute pain nurse tried to remove the epidural catheter and encountered difficulty, she reported this to the resident on call, who also tried and found it unusually difficult to remove. A senior consultant was involved where he found a high resistance, several methods had been tried unsuccessfully. Surgical removal was the option, patient and partner were informed and consented, a neurosurgeon was consulted. Through a small incision (1 inch) a fenestration of ligamentum flavum was performed and a knotted and looped epidural catheter was removed. Patient was discharged next day, and in the follow up and subsequent visits patient remained well with no other complaints.     

Repeated failure of epidural analgesia: an association with epidural fat?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To report the case of a patient who experienced repeated failed epidural analgesia associated with an unusual amount of fat in the epidural space (epidural lipomatosis). CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old female presented for an elective small bowel resection. An L(1-2) epidural catheter was placed for postoperative analgesia. The patient gave no indication of having pain at the time of emergence from general anesthesia or in the first 2 hours in the recovery room. Assessment of the level of hypoesthesia to ice while the patient was comfortable in the recovery room suggested a functional epidural catheter (cephalad level of T(10)). Two hours after admission to the recovery room the patient began to complain of increasing pain. Another 6 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered via the catheter. The patient's pain decreased, but remained substantial, and there was minimal evidence of sensory block above the T(10) level. Subsequently, a T(10) epidural catheter was placed. Testing confirmed proper placement of the catheter in the epidural space at the T(10) level. A test dose of 5 mL 0.25% bupivacaine resulted in prompt and complete relief of the patient's pain. However, the level of hypoesthesia to ice did not exceed the T(10) level. Approximately 1 hour later the patient complained of increasing discomfort again. There was no evidence of any sensory block, and there was no response to a bolus of 8 mL 1% lidocaine. A thorough examination of the patient did not suggest any cause for the pain other than a malfunctioning epidural catheter. A third epidural catheter was placed at the T(8-9) level. This catheter was again confirmed to be in the epidural space with a test dose of 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. The level of hypoesthesia to ice was restricted to a narrow bilateral band from T(7)-T(9). Analgesia failed 2 hours later. The epidural catheter was removed and the patient's pain was subsequently managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed extensive epidural fat dorsal to the spinal cord from C(5)-C(7) and from T(3)-T(9). An imaging diagnosis of asymptomatic epidural lipomatosis was established. CONCLUSION: We have described a case of repeated failure of epidural analgesia in a patient with epidural lipomatosis.     

Skin lesions on the back along the epidural Catheter

We report a patient with anemia and hypoalbuminemia who developed decubitus ulcer along the epidural catheter. A 35-year-old woman underwent cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Erosive and erythematous skin lesions along the epidural catheter were noted 48 hours after insertion of the epidural catheter. The skin lesions were thought to be decubitus ulcer along the epidural catheter due to mechanical pressure caused by fixation of the catheter with an adhesive tape after prolonged supine position.     

Vertebral osteomyelitis secondary to epidural catheter use: a case report.

STUDY DESIGN: A case of vertebral osteomyelitis secondary to epidural catheter use is reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of vertebral osteomyelitis after the use of an epidural catheter. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral osteomyelitis is a rare but serious complication of epidural catheter use that apparently has not been reported previously in orthopedic literature. METHODS: A patient underwent abdominal surgery, and an epidural catheter was used for postoperative pain relief. He presented 3 months later with severe midlumbar pain. Magnetic resonance imaging and microbiologic examination of a specimen obtained at open biopsy were used in the investigation. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging suggested vertebral osteomyelitis involving L1-L3. The patient underwent open debridement and posterior instrument stabilization. Biopsies taken from L3 pedicles yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which had been recovered earlier from the epidural catheter tip. CONCLUSION: Vertebral osteomyelitis is a rare but serious complication of epidural catheter use.     

Detection of subdural placement of epidural catheter using nerve stimulation

PURPOSE: To report the detection of a subdural catheter placement using nerve stimulation through an epidural catheter. CLINICAL FEATURES: An 85-yr-old gentleman was scheduled for radical cystectomy and creation of an ileal conduit. Combined general anesthesia and regional technqiue was selected. An epidural catheter (19 G Arrow Flextip Plus) was inserted prior to induction of general anesthesia. Intra-operatively, the patient received 5 mg morphine and 10 ml bupivacane 0.5% via the epidural catheter. The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the operation and did not require intravenous opioids. The patient was discharged to the ward with an order for epidural morphine for pain control. The next day, the patient remained comfortable. As an ongoing quality assessment to survey the success rate of epidural catheters at our institution, all patients are invited to have their catheter assessed using an electrical epidural stimulation test. Electrical stimulation (1-10 mA) with a segmental motor response (truncal or extremities movement) indicates that the catheter is in the epidural space. No motor response indicates that it is not. In this case, subdural catheter placement was suspected because a diffuse motor response including right anterior chest wall, back muscle, and bilateral lower extremities was observed using only 0.3 mA. Subdural catheter placement was subsequently confirmed by a radiograph showing a very thin film of dye spreading cephalad and caudad over many segments. CONCLUSION: This new electrical test helps to detect subdural placement objectively.     

Epidural haematoma following anticoagulant treatment in a patient with an indwelling epidural catheter

We report the occurrence of an epidural haematoma after the removal of a lumbar epidural catheter, which had been inserted 2 days previously for surgery to revise a thrombosed femoral–popliteal graft. Pre-operatively the patient received intravenous heparin by infusion, but this was stopped 7 h prior to epidural insertion. Coagulation studies were normal. The epidural catheter insertion was unremarkable. Postoperatively, the patient received a continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl (3 μg.ml⁻¹) and bupivacaine (0.0625%), in addition to systemic anticoagulant therapy with heparin. On the second postoperative day, the patient was noted to have developed bilateral leg weakness (following transfer to another department for Doppler studies). The epidural catheter was inadvertently removed while the patient was anticoagulated and paraparesis developed overnight. After a significant delay, an epidural haematoma was diagnosed and treated by decompressive laminectomy. At operation an epidural haematoma extending posteriorly from T₁₂ to L₃ was removed.     

Accidental severance of epidural catheter used in a patient with postoperative delirium

A 79-year-old man with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a lumbar epidural catheter inserted for postoperative pain control of bypass graft surgery with continuous epidural analgesia. Five days after the operation, we noticed that forced traction by the patient with delirium had led to the catheter tip being separated and left behind in his body. The remaining portion of the catheter was detected using a lateral lumbar roentgenogram and CT imaging, and it was later removed surgically. We conclude that it was necessary to change the method of analgesia in this patient, since it was difficult to maintain the epidural catheter.     

Spinal myoclonus possibly caused by epidural anesthesia

We report a patient who developed a rare neurological complication of spinal myoclonus possibly caused by an epidural catheter. A 24-yr-old female received laparoscopy and intrauterine curettage under general combined with epidural anesthesia. Spinal myoclonus started about 4 hours after the last epidural drug injection and disappeared 2 hours following removal of the epidural catheter. The patient was discharged without any untoward neurological sequelae.     

Total spinal anaesthesia as a complication of local anaesthetic test-dose administration through an epidural catheter

We describe a case of total spinal anaesthesia, which occurred after a 3-ml lignocaine (20 mg ml(-1)) test dose was administered through an epidural catheter in a 79-year-old patient scheduled for gastrectomy under combined general and epidural anaesthesia. The surgery was postponed, and the patient required admission to the intensive therapy unit. Spinal MRI from the total spinal cord did not reveal any pathology. During the next 24 h the patient recovered and after 11 days was successfully operated on under general anaesthesia. No late complications followed. We presume that during placement, the epidural catheter had migrated to the spinal canal as a result of technical difficulties. Although controversial, we consider that administering a standard test dose of local anaesthetic via an epidural catheter is recommended, especially in high-risk patients and when epidural space identification or catheter placement poses technical difficulties. A test dose of local anaesthetic does not fully prevent complications.     

Spinal epidural hematoma following epidural catheter removal in a paraplegic patient

Spinal epidural hematoma is a rare and devastating complication of epidural catheter removal in an anticoagulated patient. The diagnosis could be quite challenging, especially in patients with preexisting neurological deficits. A 35-year-old patient with remote spinal cord injury and T4 level paraplegia developed a spinal epidural hematoma on the 7th postoperative day. The hematoma developed after epidural catheter removal with concurrent administration of unfractionated heparin.     

Anesthetic management of a patient with acute idiopathic pandysautonomia

Acute idiopathic pandysautonomia (AIPD) is a very rare disease with acute onset of impairment in the peripheral sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. We report the anesthetic management of a patient with AIPD undergoing bladder lithotomy and scrotum abscess drainage. A 64-year-old man had a severe orthostatic hypotension, and was extremely sensitive to intravenous norepinephrine because of denervation hypersensitivity. Before the surgery, the patient was sufficiently hydrated. We planned to administer a vasopressor (phenylephrine) and a vasodilator (nicardipine) at 1/10 of usual doses. After placement of a radial artery catheter, combined epidural and spinal anesthesia was performed with the patient in a right lateral position. Blood pressure decreased slightly after placing him in a supine position. However, no medication was needed, and the patient showed no perioperative complications.     

Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review

We noted in our practice of obstetric anesthesia at a large teaching hospital that the epidural catheter failure rate was higher than previously reported. We undertook this study to determine the incidence of epidural catheter failure in parturients and to determine the primary causes of failure. After institutional approval, we evaluated the charts of parturients who received epidural analgesia for labor or anesthesia for cesarean section for 6 randomly selected months spanning one year. We examined 4240 anesthesia records for patient-related data, operator-related data (years of training) and technical information. The participants were unaware there was a study in progress, and data were collected in a systematic fashion so as to minimize data collection related biases. Chi2, Mantel-Haenszel chi2, analysis of variance and univariate logistic regression were used to analyze data. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall epidural catheter failure rate was 13.1% with a dural puncture rate of 1.03%. The major causes of catheter failure were no analgesia and unilateral block. The experience of the anesthesiologist, the mode of delivery, patient age, patient weight, type of epidural catheter, occurrence of paresthesia and the use of CSE were all associated with significantly different epidural catheter replacement rates. Despite the initially high failure rate, the overall patient satisfaction rate was greater than 98%.     

Determining epidural catheter location using nerve stimulation with radiological confirmation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of epidural stimulation to confirm epidural catheter placement has been shown. This case report describes the benefits and problems of using the epidural stimulation test to confirm epidural catheter placement and provides supporting evidence for these observations using radiological imaging. CASE REPORT: METHODS: A nerve stimulator was connected to the proximal end of an epidural catheter via an adapter. The cathode lead was connected to the adapter. The anode lead was connected to an electrode placed on the upper extremity as a grounding site. Using 1 to 10 mA current, a segmental motor response indicated that the catheter was in the epidural space. The absence of a motor response indicated that it was not. CASES: In the first patient, the new test predicted subcutaneous epidural catheter placement, which was subsequently confirmed radiologically. In the second patient, the catheter tip was found to be lying near a nerve root, which was again confirmed radiologically. In the third case, a negative test was initially observed with only local muscle movement over the biceps area (T2). After relocation of the grounding electrode to the lower extremity, segmental intercostal muscle movement (T4-5 level) was observed. The catheter placement was radiologically shown to be in the T4-5 region. CONCLUSION: This report illustrates some of the potential benefits and problems of using the nerve stimulation test to confirm epidural catheter placement, with radiological verification.     

Risikoabwägung vor Periduralkatheterentfernung bei akutem Koronarsyndrom

Perioperative pain therapy using an epidural catheter is the standard operating procedure for numerous surgical interventions. The necessity of initiating anticoagulant therapy in a patient with an epidural catheter requires a careful weighing up between thromboembolic complications and epidural hematoma. The case presented here of a 47-year-old female patient who was operated on for mastectomy with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap demonstrates a possible solution to this dilemma. The patient sustained a perioperative ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with drug-eluting stents while undergoing epidural pain therapy. By using the short-acting antiplatelet drug tirofiban over a time period of 7 days the gap for dual antiplatelet therapy was reduced with the help of specific platelet aggregation assays to a time frame of a few hours to minimize the risk of stent thrombosis. The epidural catheter was removed without complications under consideration of the current recommendations for regional anesthesia and antithrombotic agents.     

Intrapleural placement of a thoracic epidural catheter in a patient with spinal stenosis

Due to the close proximity of the thoracic epidural space and parietal pleura, pleural puncture with intrapleural catheter placement is a potential complication of thoracic epidural anesthesia. The authors present a case of an obese patient with a history of spinal stenosis that underwent thoracotomy. Repeated failed attempts at epidural anesthesia were complicated by intrapleural placement of the catheter. The patient subsequently developed clinical signs of pneumothorax and required urgent thoracostomy.