Persistence with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: the UK experience

Introduction The objective of this paper was to determine the persistence with teriparatide at 12 months in all patients in the UK who were prescribed the treatment since its launch.Methods Virtually all patients prescribed teriparatide in the UK receive treatment through Healthcare at Home, Basingstoke, UK. Data was obtained to assess the start date, discontinuation date and reason for discontinuation in all patients receiving teriparatide since its launch. Persistence was defined as the number of patients continuing treatment.Results A total of 1,104 patients were included in the analysis. The median duration of use in all patients was 252 days. Of the 435 patients who were at least 12 months post-initiation of treatment, persistence was 87%. Forty-two patients (3.8%) had discontinued treatment due to adverse events.Conclusions This study demonstrates that persistence with teriparatide at 12 months is very high and is probably greater than that of existing oral therapies for osteoporosis. The reasons for the high persistence rates seen with teriparatide are likely to be multi-factorial. The high persistence rates should help to optimise the effectiveness of therapy in this group of high-risk patients.     

Characteristics of patients initiating teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis

Summary The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients initiating teriparatide were compared with those of patients initiating bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. In these samples of commercially insured, Medicare, and Medicaid patients, patients initiating teriparatide were older, in poorer health, and appeared to have more severe osteoporosis than patients initiating bisphosphonates. Introduction The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients initiating teriparatide are compared with those of patients initiating bisphosphonates. Methods Beneficiaries (45 years and older) with at least one claim for teriparatide or a bisphosphonate from 2003 to 2005 and continuous enrollment in the previous 12 months and subsequent 6 months were identified from commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid administrative claims databases. Patients initiating teriparatide (commercial/Medicare (N = 2,218); Medicaid (N = 824)) were compared to patients initiating bisphosphonates (commercial/Medicare (N = 97,570); Medicaid (N = 77,526)) in terms of age, provider specialty, comorbidities, prior use of osteoporosis medications, fractures, BMD screening, health status, and resource utilization. Results Teriparatide patients were older and in poorer health than bisphosphonate patients. Approximately 38% of teriparatide patients in both groups had fractured in the pre-period compared to 16% of commercial/Medicare and 15% of Medicaid bisphosphonate patients. Teriparatide patients were more likely to have used osteoporosis medications in the pre-period (79.9% versus 32.1% (commercial/Medicare); 82.2% versus 19.6% (Medicaid)). Conclusions In these samples of patients, those initiating teriparatide differed from those initiating bisphosphonates. Teriparatide patients were older, in poorer health, and appeared to have more severe osteoporosis than bisphosphonate patients. Comparisons of treatment outcomes should take these differences in patient characteristics into consideration.     

Adrenal effects of teriparatide in the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis

Summary  

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of teriparatide on the hypophysis–adrenal axis in postmenopausal women. Treatment with teriparatide increased plasmatic and urinary levels of cortisol after 6 and 12 months. Our paper demonstrates a possible direct secretagogue effect of teriparatide on adrenals in osteoporotic postmenopausal women.     

Histomorphometric changes by teriparatide in alendronate-pretreated women with osteoporosis

Summary

The level of increased bone formation after 24 months of treatment with teriparatide (rhPTH (1–34), TPTD) is similar in patients who were either treatment-naïve (TN) or had lower bone turnover initially due to previous alendronate (ALN) therapy.

Introduction

Bone anabolic effects of TPTD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis may be blunted during the initial phase after switching from ALN to TPTD. To explore the long-term implications, we examined histomorphometric and biochemical markers of bone turnover of patients on TPTD therapy after long-term ALN treatment.

Methods

Paired biopsies were obtained after tetracycline double labeling at baseline and after 24 months of TPTD treatment from 29 ALN-pretreated (64.5?±?16.4 months) and 16 TN patients. Biochemical markers were measured at baseline, during the treatment, or at study end.

Results

Compared with the baseline, after 24-month TPTD, activation frequency (Ac.F.) and osteoid surface (OS) increased in both groups: 0.11–0.34 cycles per year, 3.96–9.8% in the ALN-pretreated group and 0.19–0.33 cycles per year, 6.2–11.3% (p?<?0.05) in the TN group, respectively. Biochemical and histomorphometric markers correlated positively both at baseline and endpoint. Serum amino terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) correlated with Ac.F. (r?=?0.57, p?<?0.001 and r?=?0.48, p?<?0.01) and OS (r?=?0.51, p?<?0.01 and r?=?0.56, p?<?0.01) at baseline and endpoint, respectively. Following 3 months of treatment, increases in biochemical markers like PINP predicted the increase in Ac.F. (r?=?0.52, p?<?0.01) and OS (r?=?0.54, p?<?0.01) after 24 months.

Conclusions

The increased level of formation is similar in patients who were either TN or had lower bone turnover initially due to previous ALN therapy. Elevated bone formation in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was sustained over a 24-month period by TPTD. Biochemical markers of bone formation are a good surrogate for the assessment of TPTD effects.     

Treatment responses with once-weekly teriparatide therapy for osteoporosis

Summary

Monitoring bone mineral density is useful to assess treatment response for osteoporosis, but it does not always reflect fracture prevention. Two types of bone mineral density thresholds were used to analyze data from a once-weekly teriparatide trial, and they appear to be useful indicators of treatment success for osteoporosis.

Introduction

This study aimed to clarify whether the criteria of treatment response could be used to evaluate treatment success with once-weekly teriparatide.

Methods

The data of subjects whose lumbar or femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the TOWER study were included. The least significant change (LSC) and the absolute change were used as the criteria for judgment of treatment success. The correlation between the incidence of fractures and the treatment response was also assessed.

Results

There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the placebo and teriparatide groups. Once-weekly teriparatide therapy for 72 weeks showed treatment success in 79.2 % of the subjects for lumbar BMD and 44.1 % for femoral neck BMD by LSC and in 50.5 and 39.6 % by absolute change, respectively. A lower incidence of vertebral fracture was observed in patients who achieved treatment success for lumbar BMD. With the LSC, some treatment success was observed in the early phase of treatment, and it increased with treatment duration.

Conclusions

It appears that the LSC could be used as a surrogate efficacy indicator at an earlier stage of treatment, and the absolute criterion of ?2.5SD was confirmed as a useful marker of long-term treatment success.

     

PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis may require treatment with the bone anabolic drug teriparatide. While changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are one measure of response, BMD changes often require a minimum of one year to observe measureable changes. Biochemical markers of bone turnover change within 1 to 3 months of initiating osteoporosis therapy. Monitoring with a marker such as procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), an osteoblast-derived protein, during teriparatide treatment may provide clinically useful information for managing patients with osteoporosis. Clinical trials have shown consistent increases in PINP within 3 months of initiating teriparatide, increases that are significantly greater than placebo and significantly different from baseline. Increases in PINP concentrations during teriparatide treatment correlate well with increases in skeletal activity assessed by radioisotope bone scans and quantitative bone histomorphometry parameters. Individuals treated with teriparatide in clinical trials usually experienced an increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L from baseline, while those given placebo usually did not. In the clinical setting, patients experiencing a significant increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L after initiating teriparatide therapy may receive an earlier confirmation of anabolic effect, while those who do not may be assessed for adherence, proper injection technique, or undetected secondary conditions that might mitigate an anabolic response. PINP monitoring may provide information supplemental to BMD monitoring and be a useful aid in managing patients receiving anabolic osteoporosis treatment in the same way that biochemical markers of bone resorption are useful in monitoring antiresorptive therapy. This review examines PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis.     

Increases in BMD correlate with improvements in bone microarchitecture with teriparatide treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Increases in BMD are correlated with improvements in 2D and 3D trabecular microarchitecture indices with teriparatide treatment. Therefore, improvements in trabecular bone microarchitecture may be one of the mechanisms to explain how BMD increases improve bone strength during teriparatide treatment. INTRODUCTION: Bone strength is determined by BMD and other elements of bone quality, including bone microarchitecture. Teriparatide treatment increases BMD and improves both cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture. Increases in lumbar spine (LS) BMD account for approximately 30-41% of the vertebral fracture risk reduction with teriparatide treatment. The relationship between increases in BMD and improvements in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture has not yet been studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between increases in BMD and improvements in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture after teriparatide treatment was assessed using data from a subset of patients who had areal BMD measurements and structural parameters from transiliac bone biopsies in the Fracture Prevention Trial. 2D histomorphometric and 3D microCT parameters were measured at baseline and 12 (n = 21) or 22 (n = 36) mo. LS BMD was assessed at baseline and 12 and 18 mo, and femoral neck (FN) BMD was measured at baseline and 12 mo. Pearson correlation was performed to assess the relationship between actual changes in BMD and actual changes in microarchitectural parameters. RESULTS: Changes in LS BMD at 12 mo were significantly correlated with improvements in trabecular bone structure at 22 mo: 2D bone volume (r = 0.45, p = 0.02), 2D mean wall thickness (r = 0.41, p = 0.03), 3D bone volume (r = 0.48, p = 0.006), 3D trabecular thickness (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), 3D trabecular separation (r = -0.37, p = 0.04), 3D structural model index (r = -0.54, p = 0.001), and 3D connectivity density (r = 0.41, p = 0.02). Changes in LS BMD at 18 mo had similar correlations with improvements in bone structure at 22 mo. Changes in FN BMD at 12 mo were significantly correlated with changes in 2D mean wall thickness (r = 0.56, p = 0.002), 3D bone volume (r = 0.51, p = 0.004), 3D trabecular thickness (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), 3D trabecular separation (r = -0.46, p = 0.01), and 3D structural model index (r = -0.55, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in BMD are correlated with improvements in trabecular microarchitecture in iliac crest of patients with teriparatide treatment. Therefore, improvements in trabecular bone microarchitecture may be one of the mechanisms to explain how BMD increases improve bone strength during teriparatide treatment.     

Improvement in health-related quality of life in osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide

Background  

Individuals with osteoporosis and recent vertebral fractures suffer from pain and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). To determine whether patients with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide experienced improvement in HRQL and pain symptoms after several months of therapy.     

Literature review: The effects of teriparatide therapy at the hip in patients with osteoporosis

Teriparatide is a skeletal anabolic treatment for patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture. Because adequate clinical trials have not yet been conducted to assess the efficacy of teriparatide for reducing the risk of hip fracture, we review here the literature regarding how treatment with teriparatide affects the hip in patients with osteoporosis. Teriparatide increases cancellous bone volume, improves bone architecture, and – uniquely among osteoporosis treatments – increases cortical thickness and cortical porosity. By bone scan and positron emission tomography, teriparatide increases bone formation throughout the skeleton, including the hip. Consistent with these findings, studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography for longitudinal assessment of changes at the hip have consistently shown increases in areal and volumetric bone mineral density, cortical thickness, and finite element-estimated hip strength in patients treated with teriparatide. Finally, in clinical fracture-outcome trials, treatment with teriparatide has been shown to reduce the risk of nonvertebral fracture, a composite endpoint that includes hip fracture. Taken together, this body of evidence suggests that teriparatide positively affects the hip in patients with osteoporosis.     

特立帕肽与阿仑膦酸盐对比治疗骨质疏松症有效性及安全性的Meta分析

目的评价特立帕肽与阿仑膦酸盐对比治疗骨质疏松症有效性和安全性的差异。方法荟萃分析。采用Cochrane系统评价的方法,检索Medline(1966～2011年)、EMbase(1966～2010年)、Cochrane图书馆(2010年)及中国生物医学文献数据库CBM(1979～2010年)有关采用特立帕肽或阿仑膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症的临床对照研究文献资料,按照纳入和排除标准限定研究对象,通过Jadad评分量表进行文献质量评估后,使用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 4.2统计软件进行Meta分析,以获得二者治疗骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性是否有差异的相关证据。结果共纳入使用特立帕肽或阿仑膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症的临床对照研究6项(760例)。各项研究中腰椎BMD的升高幅度存在异质性,采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析,特立帕肽治疗组在随访期间腰椎BMD的升高幅度比阿仑膦酸盐组高5.16%(95%CI,4.07%～6.26%),P<0.01,差异具有显著的统计学意义。随访期内发生的不良反应包括高钙血症(2.84%,特立帕肽组),背痛(3.98%,阿仑膦酸盐组)等。采用固定效应模型进行Mete分析,合并OR值为0.75(95%CI,0.51～1.11),P=0.15,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论特立帕肽对骨质疏松症患者腰椎BMD的升高幅度高于阿仑膦酸盐,二者的安全性近似,但尚需更多高质量的前瞻性临床对照研究进一步证实。     

Response rate of bone mineral density to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

PURPOSE: It is desirable for clinicians to know what bone mineral density (BMD) response they can expect in women treated with osteoporosis therapies. The focus of this analysis was to determine what percentage of women attained a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that equaled or exceeded the least significant change (LSC) value of 3%. METHODS: Data from three clinical trials involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were examined. The Fracture Prevention Trial was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial examining the safety and efficacy of teriparatide 20 and 40 microg/day. The other two trials were double-blinded, head-to-head comparisons of alendronate 10 mg/day and teriparatide 20 or 40 microg/day, respectively. Only treatment-compliant women who had lumbar spine BMD measurements at all specified time points in these trials were included. For reference, we also examined the percentage of women with lumbar spine BMD responses to alendronate. Hip BMD responses that equaled or exceeded 3% were also examined. RESULTS: According to the LSC criteria, 91% of the teriparatide 20 microg/day group and 94% of the teriparatide 40 microg/day group were lumbar spine BMD responders at 18 months in the Fracture Prevention Trial. In the teriparatide 20 microg/alendronate head-to-head trial, 94% of women receiving teriparatide had a lumbar spine BMD response that equaled or exceeded the 3% criterion at 18 months compared to 75% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). In the teriparatide 40 microg/day group of the other head-to-head trial, 92% of women achieved the 3% criterion for the lumbar spine at 12 months compared to 69% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). The median 3-month change in amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 [PINP] in women who had a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide at 18 months was larger than in women who did not have a lumbar spine BMD response. However, the median 3-month PINP change in lumbar spine BMD nonresponders still exceeded the LSC value of 10 microg/L. Although the percentage of teriparatide-treated women with a hip BMD response that met the 3% criterion was significantly greater than for placebo, there was no significant difference between the percentage of teriparatide 20 microg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day responders in the comparison trial. The baseline characteristics of teriparatide lumbar spine responders and nonresponders were similar. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that the vast majority of treatment-compliant postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and minimal prior bisphosphonate exposure have a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that meets or exceeds the LSC. The characteristics of teriparatide responders and nonresponders were not significantly different; thus, we were unable to discern any characteristics that could be used to identify potential nonresponders.     

Efficacy data on teriparatide (parathyroid hormone) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Until recently, the only therapeutic agents available for postmenopausal osteoporosis acted by inhibiting bone resorption and decreased the fracture risk by no more than 50%. Teriparatide, the recombinant 1-34 fragment of human parathyroid hormone, is a bone formation enhancer that has recently been licensed for use in established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Intermittent parathyroid hormone administration preferentially stimulates bone formation. The resultant increase in bone mass and improvement in bone architecture translate into a large decrease in the fracture risk that constitutes a major advance in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Further work is needed to define the role for teriparatide in the therapeutic strategy for postmenopausal osteoporosis and to determine whether this agent is best used alone or in synchronous or sequential combination with bone resorption inhibitors.     

Effect of raloxifene after recombinant teriparatide [hPTH(1–34)] treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Summary Loss of bone mineral density occurs after discontinuation of teriparatide, if no subsequent treatment is given. Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at lumbar spine and further increased bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck, whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment. Introduction We compared the sequential effects of raloxifene treatment with a placebo on teriparatide-induced increases in bone mineral density (BMD). A year of open-label raloxifene extended the study to assess the response with and without delay after discontinuation of teriparatide. Methods Following a year of open-label teriparatide 20 μg/day treatment, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 157) or a placebo (n = 172) for year 2, followed by a year of open-label raloxifene. BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Results The raloxifene and placebo groups showed a decrease in lumbar spine (LS) BMD in year 2 for raloxifene and placebo groups (−1.0 ± 0.3%, P = 0.004; and −4.0 ± 0.3%, P < 0.001, respectively); the decrease was less with raloxifene (P < 0.001). Open-label raloxifene treatment reversed the LS BMD decrease with a placebo, resulting in similar decreases 2 years after randomization (−2.6 ± 0.4% (raloxifene-raloxifene) and −2.7 ± 0.4% (placebo-placebo). At study end, LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD were higher than pre-teriparatide levels, with no significant differences between the raloxifene-raloxifene and placebo-raloxifene groups, respectively (LS: 6.1 ± 0.5% vs. 5.1 ± 0.5%; FN: 3.4 ± 0.6% vs. 3.0 ± 0.5%). Conclusion Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at the LS and increased FN BMD whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment. Preliminary data presented previously at the International Osteoporosis Foundation World Congress on Osteoporosis, Toronto Canada June 2–6, 2006, abstract published: Adami S, Munoz-Torres M, Econs MJ, Sipos A, Xie L, Dalsky GP, McClung M, Felsenberg D, Brown JP, Brandi ML, San Martin J. Effect of raloxifene after teriparatide treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(Suppl 2):S137.     

Effect of teriparatide on pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis with multiple vertebral fractures

Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is very rare, but it can cause severe vertebral compression fractures with disabling back pain. PLO patients have commonly been treated with antiresorptive agents against high bone turnover. There are, however, some concerns regarding the use of bisphosphonates: (1) PLO occurs during the first pregnancy with a high possibility of recurrence during the second pregnancy, (2) long-term outcomes of bisphosphonates in PLO are lacking, and (3) there is a possibility of bisphosphonates accumulated in the bones crossing the placenta. Therefore, alternative therapies must be considered. We analyzed the effect of teriparatide (TPTD), the human recombinant parathyroid hormone (1-34), for 18?months in three women with PLO. Multiple vertebral fractures with severe back pain appeared within 6?months after their first childbirth. Two of them had a family history of osteoporosis. Lactation was discontinued immediately after diagnosis of PLO. Calcium carbonate, cholecalciferol, and TPTD were prescribed. The back pain immediately resolved. Bone mineral density (BMD) increased by 14.5-25.0% (mean 19.5%) at the lumbar spine and by 9.5-16.7% (mean 13.1%) at the femoral neck, after 18?months of treatment. The final Z scores in these PLO patients were nearly normalized. Two women had a second baby without any complication. BMD significantly improved after 18 months of treatment with TPTD without further fractures. In conclusion, TPTD should be considered to avoid long-term morbidity in young patients with PLO and is highly encouraged for use in PLO patients with multiple vertebral fractures.