Continuous oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder

BackgroundThe study was conducted to investigate continuous daily levonorgestrel 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg (LNG/EE) on premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD).Study DesignIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, women with PMDD received LNG/EE (n=186) or placebo (n=181) daily for 112 days and completed the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP).ResultsMean DRSP change from baseline to late luteal phase was significantly greater with LNG/EE than placebo at the late luteal phase of the first estimated cycle (?30.52±1.73 [SE] vs. ?22.47±1.77; p<.001) and the worst 5 days during the last on-therapy estimated cycle (?26.77±1.83 vs. ?20.89±1.82; p=.016). Other primary end points were not statistically significant. Significantly more subject taking LNG/EE (52%) than placebo (40%) responded (≥50% improvement in the DRSP 7-day late luteal phase score and Clinical Global Impression of Severity score of ≥1 improvement) at last on-therapy cycle (p=.025).ConclusionsContinuous daily LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg was well tolerated and may be useful for managing the physical, psychological and behavioral symptoms and loss of work productivity related to PMDD.     

Bleeding pattern with drospirenone 3 mg+ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg 24/4 combined oral contraceptive compared with desogestrel 150 mcg+ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg 21/7 combined oral contraceptive

Background

The study was conducted to compare cycle control, bleeding pattern and efficacy of two low-dose combined oral contraceptives.

Study Design

Four hundred fifty-three women were randomized to receive a 24/4 regimen of drospirenone 3 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg (drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg; n=230) or a 21/7 regimen of desogestrel 150 mcg/EE 20 mcg (DSG 150 mcg/EE 20 mcg; n=223), and recorded bleeding daily over 7 treatment cycles.

Results

The duration [mean 4.7 (SD 1.5)-5.2 (SD 2.2) days in the drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 group and 5.1 (SD 1.5)-5.4 (SD 2.1) days in the DSG 150 mcg/ EE 20 mcg group] and maximum intensity (“normal bleeding” for >50% of all subjects) of scheduled bleeding in Cycles 1-6 was comparable between treatment groups. The incidence of unscheduled bleeding during Cycles 2-6 was also similar between the two groups (drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg, 8.8-17.3%; DSG 150 mcg/ EE 20 mcg, 9.4-16.3%).

Conclusion

Drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 achieved an acceptable bleeding profile with reliable cycle control, comparable with an established formulation.     

Safety and bleeding profile of continuous levonorgestrel 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg based on 2 years of clinical trial data in Canada

BackgroundThe study was conducted to evaluate bleeding profile and safety of continuous oral contraceptive (OC) containing levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg.Study DesignHealthy women who participated at seven Canadian sites in 1-year open-label study of LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg daily were eligible for this second-year extension study. Primary end points included bleeding profile and adverse events.ResultsSeventy-nine women enrolled without interrupting pill taking; 62 (78.5%) completed. Adverse events were comparable to cyclic OC regimens, except unscheduled vaginal bleeding. Amenorrhea and absence of bleeding increased to about 80% and 90%, respectively, by Pill Pack 18. Mean (median) number of bleeding days for the last two 90-day intervals was 1.1 (0) and 0.7 (0) days, respectively.ConclusionsContinuous LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg had a safety profile similar to low-dose cyclic OCs. Short-term safety profile remained excellent, with increasing rates of amenorrhea and decreasing incidence of unscheduled bleeding and/or spotting.     

Safety and bleeding profile of continuous levonorgestrel 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg based on 2 years of clinical trial data in Canada

Background

The study was conducted to evaluate bleeding profile and safety of continuous oral contraceptive (OC) containing levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg.

Study Design

Healthy women who participated at seven Canadian sites in 1-year open-label study of LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg daily were eligible for this second-year extension study. Primary end points included bleeding profile and adverse events.

Results

Seventy-nine women enrolled without interrupting pill taking; 62 (78.5%) completed. Adverse events were comparable to cyclic OC regimens, except unscheduled vaginal bleeding. Amenorrhea and absence of bleeding increased to about 80% and 90%, respectively, by Pill Pack 18. Mean (median) number of bleeding days for the last two 90-day intervals was 1.1 (0) and 0.7 (0) days, respectively.

Conclusions

Continuous LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg had a safety profile similar to low-dose cyclic OCs. Short-term safety profile remained excellent, with increasing rates of amenorrhea and decreasing incidence of unscheduled bleeding and/or spotting.     

Ovarian activity and safety of a novel levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol continuous oral contraceptive regimen

Background

A continuous regimen of oral levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg was evaluated for inhibition of ovulation, time to return to ovulation after stopping treatment and safety.

Study Design

This open-label study was conducted in healthy women aged 18-35 years. Ovulation was documented before treatment, and then participants received oral tablets containing LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg to be taken continuously for three 28-day intervals. Ovarian activity was assessed three times per week during the treatment period with transvaginal ultrasound scans and measurements of serum 17β-estradiol, progesterone, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations. Safety assessments included physical examinations, laboratory evaluations and adverse event records.

Results

Thirty-seven of the 58 subjects who received treatment met predefined criteria for efficacy analysis. No on-treatment ovulations occurred in the efficacy or intent-to-treat population. There was evidence of ovulation within 37 days of stopping treatment for 46 (98%) of 47 subjects evaluated posttreatment. The final subject with a history of polycystic ovarian syndrome ovulated by Day 66. The safety profile observed during this 84-day continuous regimen was similar to that seen with other low-dose oral contraceptives administered in a cyclic regimen.

Conclusions

The continuous LNG/EE regimen completely inhibited ovulation, with little evidence of follicular development and with rapid return of ovulatory capacity after stopping treatment.     

Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder with a new drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive formulation

PURPOSE: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study evaluated the efficacy of a new oral contraceptive (OC) formulation containing drospirenone 3 mg and ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mug in treating symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). METHOD: The OC formulation or placebo was administered for 24 days in a 28-day cycle (24/4), rather than the usual 21-day active treatment, 7-day inert-pill regimen. Participants (N=64) were randomized to either study treatment for three cycles and then after a washout period of one treatment-free cycle switched to the alternate treatment. RESULTS: The mean decrease from baseline for total Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) scores while using drospirenone/EE was significantly greater than for placebo (-12.47, 95% CI=-18.28, -6.66; p<.001). A positive response (i.e., a score of 1 or 2 in the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale) occurred in 61.7% and 31.8% of subjects while taking drospirenone/EE and placebo, respectively (p=.009). CONCLUSION: Drospirenone/EE, given in a 24/4 regimen, was superior to placebo for improving symptoms associated with PMDD.     

Efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose,extended-regimen levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen (ADER) combined oral contraceptive consisting of levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg for 42 days, LNG 150 mcg/EE 25 mcg for 21 days, LNG 150 mcg/EE 30 mcg for 21 days and EE 10 mcg for 7 days.

Study Design

This was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study. Sexually active women aged 18–40 years were enrolled and received ADER for up to 1 year (4 consecutive 91-day cycles). Participants kept diaries to record adherence, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index and the life-table method; safety and tolerability were assessed through reported adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 3701 women were enrolled and 2144 completed the study. The Pearl Index was 3.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.49–4.03], based on 70 pregnancies that occurred after ADER initiation and ≤ 7 days after the last LNG/EE or EE-only pill in women aged 18–35 years, excluding cycles in which another contraceptive method was used. Life-table pregnancy rate was 2.82% (95% CI, 2.23%–3.57%) for all users aged 18–35 years. Unscheduled bleeding/spotting decreased with increasing EE doses within each cycle and decreased after cycle 1. No unexpected AEs or changes in laboratory parameters were reported.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that ADER effectively prevented pregnancy with a favorable safety and tolerability profile.     

Cycle control with oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol. A multicenter, randomized comparison of levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (100 micrograms/20 micrograms) and norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol (1000 micrograms/20 micrograms).

A randomized, open-label, multicenter study was undertaken to compare the effects of oral contraceptives (OC) containing 100 micrograms levonorgestrel (LNG)/20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) (Aless/Loette) and 1000 micrograms norethindrone acetate (NETA)/20 micrograms EE (Loestrin Fe 1/20) on menstrual cycle control over four cycles of use. A total of 84 evaluable women provided 274 cycles of exposure in the LNG/EE group, and 89 women provided 289 cycles of exposure in the NETA/EE group. Overall, the LNG/EE group achieved a consistently higher percentage of normal menstrual cycles as well as a lower rate of intermenstrual bleeding and amenorrhea than the NETA/EE group. In cycle 4, 63.8% of cycles were normal in the LNG/EE group compared with 41.9% in the NETA/EE group (p < 0.005). Of the total cycles in the NETA/EE group, 10% were amenorrheic, compared with 1.1% in the LNG/EE group. The occurrence of bleeding and/or spotting was significantly lower in cycles 2 and 3 in the LNG/EE group (41.7% and 34.8%, respectively) compared with the NETA/EE group (62.3% and 56.3%; p < 0.05). Other cycle variables were generally similar between groups, as was the incidence of adverse events. These results demonstrate that good cycle control was achieved with an OC containing 20 micrograms EE and that 100 micrograms LNG/20 micrograms EE produces better cycle control than 1000 micrograms NETA/20 micrograms EE.     

Comparison of a novel norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) with the oral contraceptive Loestrin Fe 1/20

This multicenter study compared the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new triphasic norgestimate (180/215/250 μg)/ethinyl estradiol 25 μg regimen (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) (n = 1,723) with that of norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 μg (Loestrin Fe 1/20) (n = 1,171). Healthy women were treated for up to 13 cycles. Demographics were similar between regimens. Contraceptive efficacy was comparable for Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo and Loestrin Fe 1/20. The overall and method failure probabilities of pregnancy through 13 cycles were 1.9% and 1.5%, respectively, with Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo and 2.6% and 2.4%, respectively, with Loestrin Fe 1/20. Breakthrough bleeding and spotting was reported by a significantly lower percentage of participants in the Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo group compared with the Loestrin Fe 1/20 group. At representative Cycles 1, 3, 6, 9, and 13, breakthrough bleeding and spotting rates were 16.3, 11.5, 10.3, 7.9, and 7.7%, respectively, in the Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo group and 34.9, 22.9, 22.2, 15.9, and 13.1%, respectively, in the Loestrin Fe 1/20 group. Compliance and safety data were similar for the two regimens.     

Evaluation of a unique oral contraceptive in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). This is the first trial of a unique oral contraceptive containing a combination of drospirenone (DRSP, 3 mg) and ethinyl estradiol (EE, 30 microg) for the treatment of PMDD. DRSP is a spironolactone-like progestin with antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid activity. Spironolactone has been shown to be beneficial in PMS, whereas oral contraceptives have shown conflicting results. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 82 women with PMDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. [DSM IV]) were randomized to receive DRSP/EE or placebo for three treatment cycles. The primary end point was change from baseline in luteal phase symptom scores as assessed on the Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences (COPE) scale. Patients treated with DRSP/EE showed a numerically greater change from baseline compared with those treated with placebo on each of the 22 COPE items and each of the 4 symptom factors. Between-group differences in symptom improvement reached statistical significance in factor 3 only (appetite, acne, and food cravings, p = 0.027). The secondary end points, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Profile of Mood States (PMS), were consistent with the primary end point in that patients treated with the oral contraceptive showed a numerically greater improvement from baseline compared with those treated with placebo. The results of this study show a consistent trend in the reduction of symptoms that suggested a beneficial effect of DRSP/EE for the treatment of PMDD, despite limitations of the study design.     

Endometrial histology following 1 year of a continuous daily regimen of levonorgestrel 90 micro g/ethinyl estradiol 20 micro g

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a continuous daily regimen of levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 micro g/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 micro g on endometrial histology. METHODS: This was a substudy of a large phase 3 trial conducted in six sites in North America. Healthy and sexually active women aged between 18 and 49 years took LNG 90 micro g/EE 20 micro g daily for 1 year. Results from endometrial biopsies performed at pretreatment baseline and those after at least 6 months of treatment were compared. RESULTS: Of the 146 participants, 93 had a baseline biopsy and completed at least six pill packs. Before treatment, 56 subjects (60%) had an endometrial biopsy with findings classified as "weakly proliferative or proliferative." During the last on-therapy visit, 48 subjects (52%) had an endometrium categorized as "other," which included primarily an inactive or benign endometrium (n=42). No hyperplasia or malignancy was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: The results of a 1-year continuous regimen of LNG 90 micro g/EE 20 micro g were shown to have a good endometrial safety profile.     

The effect of ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg and levonorgestrel 250 mcg on the pituitary-ovarian function during normal tablet-taking and when tablets are missed

A new combined pill containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol and 250 micrograms of levonorgestrel has been developed. The safety margin of this type of low-dose preparation needed to be assessed and this was done by evaluating daily levels of LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone, 1-NG and EE2 as well as cervical mucus characteristics in six patients when one and then two consecutive pills were deliberately omitted mid-way through the cycle. Results demonstrated that there was no evidence of breakthrough ovulation, although there was some continued ovarian steroidogenesis, a feature consistent with previous studies using combined preparations. Existing instructions to patients regarding missed pills should continue in order to ensure maximal contraceptive safety.     

Safety and efficacy of an extended-regimen oral contraceptive utilizing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Seasonique, a 91-day extended-regimen oral contraceptive (OC) utilizing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) during the typical hormone-free interval. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, 1-year study of Seasonique [30 microg EE/150 microg levonorgestrel (LNG)] for 84 days followed by EE 10 microg for 7 days was conducted in sexually active, adult women of childbearing potential. All patients completed daily electronic diaries to monitor compliance and bleeding. RESULTS: Method failure rate was 0.78 (Pearl index) and 0.64% (life table analysis). Cycle control and safety of the regimen were similar to that reported for other OCs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Seasonique is effective, safe and well tolerated for the prevention of pregnancy.     

The effect of norethisterone (500 mcg) and ethinyl estradiol (35 mcg) capsules on the pituitary-ovarian axis

Previous studies have noted a differential absorption of steroid hormones when they were suspended in a medium of polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400). The effect of this formulation, containing norethisterone 500 mcg and ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg, on the pituitary-ovarian axis was studied in twelve patients in order to assess its efficacy, while hopefully improving cycle control. Results demonstrated for the most part suppression of ovulation with initially, good cycle control.     

Follicular development in a 7-day versus 4-day hormone-free interval with an oral contraceptive containing 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg norethindrone acetate

Background

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) formulations with 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) have a greater incidence of ovarian hormone production and follicular development, which can be managed by shortening the number of hormone-free days per COC cycle. This study evaluates differences in follicular development during a 7-day versus 4-day hormone-free interval in a COC regimen with 20 mcg EE and 1 mg norethindrone acetate.

Study Design

Forty-one healthy women were randomized in an open-label fashion to this formulation in either a 24/4 or a 21/7 day regimen for three cycles. Estradiol, progesterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and inhibin B were measured daily from Cycle 2, Day 21 to Cycle 3, Day 3 and on Day 7 of Cycle 3. Follicular diameter and Hoogland score were calculated on Cycle 2, Days 21, 24 and 28 and Cycle 3, Days 3 and 7.

Results

Sixty-six percent of subjects in the 21/7 group and 70% of the subjects in the 24/4 group developed a follicle greater than 10 mm diameter. Ovarian steroid hormone levels, Hoogland scores and bleeding patterns were not statistically significant between the groups.

Conclusion

In contrast to prior studies, this analysis suggests no difference in follicle development or bleeding patterns among women receiving a 21/7 or 24/4 regimen of a 20-mcg EE/1-mg norethindrone acetate COC.     

Bleeding pattern and cycle control with an estradiol-based oral contraceptive: a seven-cycle, randomized comparative trial of estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel

Background

This study compared the bleeding pattern, cycle control and safety of an oral contraceptive (OC) comprising estradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG; administered using a dynamic dosing regimen) with a monophasic OC containing ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg/levonorgestrel 100 mcg (EE/LNG). E2V releases estradiol (E2), which is identical to endogenously produced 17β-estradiol.

Study design

This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy trial lasting seven cycles in healthy women aged 18-50 years.

Results

Overall, 798 women were randomized and received allocated treatment (399 per group). There were significantly fewer bleeding/spotting days reported by women who received E2V/DNG than those who received EE/LNG [17.3±10.4 vs. 21.5±8.6, respectively, p<.0001, Reference Period 1 (Days 1-90); and 13.4±9.vs. 15.9±7.1, respectively, p<.0001, Reference Period 2 (Days 91-180)]. Through Cycles 1-7, the occurrence of scheduled withdrawal bleeding per cycle was 77.7-83.2% with E2V/DNG and 89.5-93.8% with EE/LNG (p<.0001 per cycle). The duration and intensity of scheduled withdrawal bleeding were reduced with E2V/DNG vs. EE/LNG. The incidence of intracyclic bleeding was similar with E2V/DNG (10.5%-18.6%) and EE/LNG (9.9%-17.1%) (p>.05 per cycle). No unintended pregnancies occurred with E2V/DNG, but there was one unintended pregnancy with EE/LNG. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 10.0% and 8.5% of women taking E2V/DNG and EE/LNG, respectively. Overall, 79.4% of women were satisfied with E2V/DNG and 79.9% with EE/LNG.

Conclusions

A novel OC composed of E2V/DNG is associated with an acceptable bleeding profile that is comparable to that of an EE-containing OC.     

Evaluation of a continuous regimen of levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol: phase 3 study results

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a continuous daily regimen of levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 microg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 microg (continuous LNG/EE). METHODS: Healthy women aged 18-49 years with regular menstrual cycles for 3 months enrolled in this single-treatment open-label study and took one pill of LNG 90 microg/EE 20 microg daily for 12 months. RESULTS: For the 2134 subjects enrolled, the Pearl Index method failure was 1.26, and user failure was 0.34. While on Pill Pack 13, 58.7% of subjects reported amenorrhea and 79.0% reported absence of bleeding. Overall, the number of bleeding and spotting days per pill pack declined progressively. Adverse events and discontinuations were comparable to those reported for cyclic oral contraceptive (OC) regimens, except for higher rates in those related to uterine bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous LNG/EE demonstrated a good safety profile and efficacy similar to cyclic OCs. The regimen continuously inhibited menses, increased the incidence of amenorrhea over time and, except for a subset of women, decreased the number of bleeding and spotting days.