Comparison of a single treatment with Q-switched ruby laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in removing black-blue Chinese tattoos

Abstract

Background: Black and blue are two popular colors in Chinese tattooing. Two Q-switched lasers, ruby and Nd:YAG, are effective for tattoo removal. No reference with regard to a comparison of the effects and adverse reactions in Chinese individuals has been made in the literature. Objective: To compare a single treatment of black-blue tattoos with the Q-switched ruby laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser. Methods: A total of 35 Chinese patients with black-blue tattoos at the laser center of the Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were enrolled into a self-control study. Tattoos were split into two parts or two nearby tattoos on the same body part were used; one side was treated with the Q-switched ruby laser and the other with the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Immediate response, treatment outcome and adverse effects were compared. The statistical significance level was set at p< 0.05. Results: Edema and exudation were more common immediately after ruby laser treatment (p< 0.05). The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser had a significant difference in tattoo lightening versus the Q-switched ruby laser after a single treatment (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse effects between the two lasers. Conclusion: The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser is more effective at tattoo lightening for Chinese individuals. Its immediate response after treatment is slighter than the Q-switched ruby laser.     

Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal

Background: The eyebrow tattoo removal using Q-switched lasers is usually prolonged. Other modalities may be required to enhance the efficacy and shorten the treatment course. Objective: To compare the efficacy of Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser alone versus combination of Q-switched Nd:YAG and Ultrapulse CO₂ lasers for eyebrow tattoo removal after a single session. Patients and methods: After local anesthesia, the right eyebrow of 20 patients was treated with Ultrapulse CO₂ laser with the parameters of 4 J/cm² and 3.2 J/cm² for the first and the second passes. Both eyebrows were then treated with 1064-nm and 532-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. The spot size and pulse duration were 3 mm and 5 nanoseconds for both wavelengths, and the fluence was 7 J/cm² for 1064 nm and 3 J/cm ² for 532 nm. Results: The side treated with combination of Q-switched Nd:YAG and CO₂ lasers improved 75–100% in 6 of 20 patients versus only 1 of 20 in the side treated with Q-switched Nd:YAG alone. Similarly, the right side in 13 of 20 patients showed more than 50% improvement with combination therapy versus the left side (the monotherapy side), where only 6 of 20 cases showed more than 50% improvement. The Mann–Whitney test was 2.85 for the right side and 1.95 for the left side (P value = 0.007). Conclusion: Using Ultra pulse CO₂ laser enhances the efficacy of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in eyebrow tattoo removal.     

A rapid tattoo removal technique using a combination of pulsed Er:YAG and Q-Switched Nd:YAG in a split lesion protocol

Background: Tattoo removal has evolved over the years and though Q-switched laser is the ‘workhorse’ laser, it invariably requires multiple sittings, which are dependent on numerous factors, including the skin colour, location of the tattoo, age of the tattoo, colour of pigment used, associated fibrosis and the kind of tattoo treated. Though ablative lasers, both pulsed CO2 and Er:YAG, have been used for recalcitrant tattoos, very few studies have been done comparing them with pigment-specific lasers. Our study was based on the premise that ablating the epidermis overlying the tattoo pigment with Er:YAG could help in gaining better access to the pigment which would enable the Q-switched laser to work effectively with less beam scattering. Objective: A study of rapid tattoo removal (RTR) technique using a combination of pulsed Er:YAG and Q-Switched Nd:YAG in a split lesion protocol. Materials and methods: This prospective study was undertaken during 2010–13 at a laser Clinic in the Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. A total of 10 patients were recruited, 5 of amateur tattoo and 5 of professional tattoo. After informed consent each tattoo was arbitrarily ‘split’ into two parts. One part was treated with QS Nd:YAG laser(1064 nm) and the other part with Er:YAG laser immediately followed by the QS Nd:YAG. The laser treatments were repeated at 6-week intervals until the tattoo pigment had cleared. On the combination side in subsequent sittings only the QS Nd:YAG was used, to minimize repetitive ablation. To ensure consistency in the intervention methods a trained dermatologist who was independent of the treatment delivery randomly rated 10% of the procedures. Results: The mean improvement achieved by the Q-switched laser (2.93) was less than the combination laser (3.85) side (p = 0.001) and needed more sessions (3.8 vs. 1.6; p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the improvement on the combination side till the second session. On the combination side patients required a maximum of 2 sessions, while the Q-switched laser required 3–5 sessions for appreciable lightening. Conclusion: From our study it was concluded that use of a pulsed ablative laser may help in rapid removal of tattoos in conjunction with QS lasers with minimal side effects and can be used as a RTR.     

A randomized,split-face clinical trial of Q-switched alexandrite laser versus Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of bilateral nevus of Ota

Different types of Q-switched (QS) lasers have been used successfully to treat nevus of Ota. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and complication of QS alexandrite (QS Alex) laser versus QS neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) (QS Nd:YAG) laser for bilateral nevus of Ota. Seventeen patients with bilateral nevus of Ota were treated randomly with QS Alex in one half of face and QS Nd:YAG in the other half with an interval of at least 3 months between each. Subjective assessment was made by both patients and dermatologists. Patients were also examined for evidence of complications. All patients experienced improvement (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two sides (p > 0.05). The pain after a short period of laser therapy was more severe for QS Alex than for QS Nd:YAG laser. Vesicles developed in 1 patient after QS Alex therapy. Both QS Alex laser and QS Nd:YAG laser were equally effective at improving bilateral nevus of Ota. Patients tolerate QS Nd:YAG laser better than QS Alex laser.     

Tattoo removal by Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: an objective evaluation using histometry

Background: Tattoos have played an important role in various human cultures for thousands of years. The creation of high power, short pulse Q-switched lasers (QS) has provided a tool for considerable therapeutic advances in tattoo removal. Objective: The aim of the study is to correlate the clinical efficacy of QS Nd: YAG laser for tattoo removal with histological as well as histometric findings. Patients and Methods: QS Nd: YAG laser was used for blue tattoo removal in 12 Egyptian patients. Sessions were done every 2 months for about 6–10 sessions (average 7). Skin phototypes of patients ranged from phototype III to V. Photographs were taken before and after every treatment session. Skin biopsies were taken from the patients before treatment and after six sessions to perform histological and histometric analysis. Results: Eight patients (66.7%) showed excellent response and four patients (33.3%) good response. No textural change or scarring was observed in any patient. Histological examination confirmed the clinical response. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections showed a significant decrease or almost complete disappearance of the tattoo pigment. Meanwhile, histometric study objectively confirmed a significant decrease in ink particle surface area after treatment. Conclusion: QS Nd: YAG laser effectively treats tattoos in dark-skinned Egyptian patients with excellent cosmetic outcome and minimal side effects. The histopathologic and histometric findings significantly correlated with the clinical response.     

A split-tattoo randomized Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium–aluminium–garnet laser trial comparing the efficacy of a novel three-pass,one-session method with a conventional method in the treatment of blue/black tattoos in darker skin types

Tattoos with blue/black ink show good lightening of pigment after treatment with 1064 nm Q-switched (QS) neodymium-doped yttrium–aluminium–garnet (Nd:YAG) laser. In this randomized trial, we compared the efficacy of a novel three pass, one session procedure (R15 method) with a conventional method for treating blue/black tattoos in darker skin types. Tattoos were treated with 1064 nm QS Nd:YAG Laser with a spot size of 4 mm, fluence of 5 J/cm² and frequency of 5 Hz. The tattoo pigment lightening was comparable with both methods. Thread-like tattoos had significantly better pigment lightening with fewer side effects than the broad band-like tattoos. We would like to recommend the R15 method of the QS Nd:YAG laser for thread-like tattoos, which can save patients’ time, cut short the frequency of their hospital visits and, more importantly, decrease the cost involved in it.     

调Q开关倍频Nd：YAG激光和超脉冲CO2激光对早期脂溢性角化病的疗效比较

目的探讨两种治疗方法对于早期脂溢性角化病的临床效果。方法将患者随机分为两组,分别用调Q开关Nd：YAG激光和超脉冲CO2激光治疗,对比观察治疗效果：结果调Q开关Nd：YAG激光总有效率为96．12％,超咏冲CO2激光治疗组总有效率97．24％,没有统计学差异。术后两组色素沉着率分别为8．74％和25．35％;色素减退率分别为4．37％和7．38％;调Q开关Nd：YAG激光没有疤痕形成,超脉冲CO2激光疤痕形成率为4．15％;均有统计学差异。结论表明调Q开关Nd：YAG激光是一种理想的治疗手段。     

Patient compliance as a major determinant of laser tattoo removal success rates: A 10-year retrospective study

Abstract

The use and success of high-energy, short-pulse, Q-switched lasers for tattoo removal has been well demonstrated. Three types of lasers are currently commercially available for tattoo removal: the Q-switched ruby laser (694 nm), the Q-switched alexandrite laser (755 nm) and the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (532 nm and 1064 nm). Multiple parameters such as tattoo type, color, location, and patient skin type dictate which laser is optimal in each patient. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of these modalities, there are few papers that address some of the long-term issues of tattoo removal, such as patient compliance, and how these issues impact on the success rates of optimal tattoo removal treatments. In this retrospective study, 10-year data from a single center are presented. Our data include parameters such as clearance rates, number of treatments, wavelength of the utilized laser, and fluence and spot-size setting. In addition, potential complications such as scarring, hypopigmentation, and pain were analyzed. Finally, we examine the patient compliance that accompanied tattoo removal and the reasons behind the typically low success rates for total tattoo clearance.     

Comparison of pulsed dye laser versus combined pulsed dye laser and Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris

Background: Both pulsed dye laser and combined 585/1064-nm (sequential dual-wavelength PDL and Nd:YAG) laser improves inflammatory skin disorders including acne vulgaris. Objective: To compare the efficacy of 585-nm pulsed dye laser versus sequential dual-wavelength PDL and Nd:YAG in treatment of acne vulgaris. Patients and method: Thirty patients with acne vulgaris were treated by PDL alone on half of the face while contra lateral half was treated by combined 585/1064 nm laser. Results: The study showed that inflammatory acne lesions count was significantly reduced by 82.5% (p 0.0001) on PDL sides and by 83.5% (p 0.00001) on combined 585/1064-nm side after 8 weeks, while reduction of non-inflammatory acne lesions was observed at 8 weeks by 58.4% and 71.5% respectively. However, difference between the two modalities was not statistically significant. Conclusion: PDL and combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser treatment were found to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment option for inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne vulgaris.     

An efficacy comparison of hair removal utilizing a diode laser and an Nd:YAG laser system in Chinese women

Abstract

Background: The 800 nm diode laser and the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser have been used successfully for hair removal for many years. Objective: To compare the efficacy of a diode laser with a Nd:YAG laser regarding axillary fossa hair removal in Chinese women. Methods: Twenty-nine Chinese women underwent three treatment sessions at 4-week intervals with a diode laser (34–38 J/cm²) on one side and a Nd:YAG laser (34–40 J/cm²) on the other side. Assessments included the reduction of hair diameter following treatment, the regrowth rate in hair length, total hair reduction and the immediate pain associated with the treatments. Results: At follow-up visit number 1 (4 weeks after the first session), the average reduction in hair diameter on the diode laser side and the Nd:YAG laser side was 2.44 μm and –0.6 μm, respectively. The regrowth rates of the hair were 61.93 μm/day and 59.84 μm/day, respectively, which were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). At follow-up visit number 1, hair reduction was 60.09% and 41.44%, respectively. At follow-up visit number 2 (4 weeks after the second session), hair reduction was noted to be 78.56% and 64.50%, respectively, which were both statistically significant (p < 0.05). Immediate pain scores at the first session were 6.97 and 6.17, respectively; at the second session were 5.48 and 6.69, respectively; and at the third session were 5.76 and 7.45, respectively; all statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The diode laser showed more efficacy and was found to be more comfortable than the Nd:YAG laser for axillary fossa hair removal in Chinese women.     

Facial scars after a road accident--combined treatment with pulsed dye laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

We report the case of a woman who presented with several facial scars following a road accident. Treatment was carried out using combined laser treatment with pulsed dye laser (PDL) and Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (QS Nd:YAG laser). No side effects or complications from treatment were noted or reported. The patient had very good cosmetic results with this combined technique. A variety of facial scars – erythematous, pigmented, atrophic, and hypertrophic – may occur as a result of trauma, surgery, burns, and skin disease. Surgery with other adjunctive methods including radiotherapy, intralesional steroids, and pressure therapy have shown variable results. Laser treatment has been attempted for scar revision since the 1980s. The PDL is the optimal treatment for reducing scar bulk and symptoms. It also decreases erythema and telangiectasia associated with scars, normalizes the skin surface texture, and improves the scar pliability. The QS Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) is highly effective for traumatic tattoo removal, resulting in complete clearance in the majority of cases.     

Paradoxical darkening of unperceived tattoo ink after relatively low fluence from a Q‐switched Nd:YAG (1064‐nm) laser in the course of treatment for melasma

Although Q‐switched (QS) lasers are the mainstay of modern tattoo removal, paradoxical darkening of tattoo ink may occur. This darkening of tattoo ink is dependent on laser wavelength, pulse duration and fluence, with high‐energy, nanosecond‐pulsed lasers more prone to induce tattoo‐ink darkening. Laser toning, consisting of multiple‐passed QS neodymium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Nd:YAG), 1064‐nm laser treatment with low fluence, short pulse duration (< 10 ns), and a repetition rate of 10 Hz has been successful in the treatment of melasma. A mistake commonly made during laser toning is to scorch scalp hair, eyebrows or eyelashes, but this phenomenon is reversible. A more problematic error is caused by treatment of eyeliner or eyebrow tattoos. We report a patient who experienced changes in unperceived, skin‐coloured tattoos, turning them blue after QS Nd:YAG laser treatment of melasma.     

Permanent makeup removal using Q‐switched Nd:YAG laser

Red‐brown tattoos are usually treated with a frequency‐doubled Q‐switched (QS) neodymium : yttrium–aluminum–garnet Nd:YAG laser (532 nm), because red and pink pigments show maximum absorption between 500 and 570 nm. Using a QS laser for red‐brown tattoo removal has sometimes led to paradoxical darkening of the tattoo pigments, and this darkened grey‐black colour may be difficult to remove. A woman with red‐brown cosmetic tattoos on her eyebrows was treated using a QS Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) initially with low fluence and subsequently with increasing fluences at 6‐weekly intervals. After the first treatment, a slight darkening of the tattoo pigments was seen, but this faded and complete clearance was achieved after five treatments. There was no downtime during every treatment and there were no scars, pigmentary alterations or textural changes.     

Laser Removal of Tattoos

Tattoos are placed for different reasons. A technique for tattoo removal which produces selective removal of each tattoo pigment, with minimal risk of scarring, is needed. Nonspecific methods have a high incidence of scarring, textural, and pigmentary alterations compared with the use of Q-switched lasers. With new advances in Q-switched laser technology, tattoo removal can be achieved with minimal risk of scarring and permanent pigmentary alteration. There are five types of tattoos: amateur, professional, cosmetic, medicinal, and traumatic. Amateur tattoos require less treatment sessions than professional multicolored tattoos. Other factors to consider when evaluating tattoos for removal are: location, age and the skin type of the patient. Treatment should begin by obtaining a pre-operative history. Since treatment with the Q-switched lasers is painful, use of a local injection with lidocaine or topical anaesthesia cream may be used prior to laser treatment. Topical broad-spectrum antibacterial ointment is applied immediately following the procedure. Three types of lasers are currently used for tattoo removal: Q-switched ruby laser (694nm), Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (532nm, 1064nm), and Q-switched alexandrite laser (755nm). The Q-switched ruby and alexandrite lasers are useful for removing black, blue and green pigments. The Q-switched 532nm Nd:YAG laser can be used to remove red pigments and the 1064nm Nd:YAG laser is used for removal of black and blue pigments. The most common adverse effects following laser tattoo treatment with the Q-switched ruby laser include textural change, scarring, and pigmentary alteration. Transient hypopigmentation and textural changes have been reported in up to 50 and 12%, respectively, of patients treated with the Q-switched alexandrite laser. Hyperpigmentation and textural changes are infrequent adverse effects of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and the incidence of hypopigmentary changes is much lower than with the ruby laser. The development of localized and generalized allergic reactions is an unusual complication following tattoo removal with the Q-switched ruby and Nd:YAG lasers. Since many wavelengths are needed to treat multicolored tattoos, not one laser system can be used alone to remove all the available inks and combination of inks. While laser tattoo removal is not perfect, we have come a long way since the advent of Q-switched lasers. Current research is focusing on newer picosecond lasers, which may be more successful than the Q-switched lasers in the removal of the new vibrant tattoo inks.     

Comparison of the 532-nm KTP and 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers for the treatment of cherry angiomas

Abstract

Background: Laser therapy is the treatment of choice for cherry angiomas since it is more effective and has better cosmetic results. There is no comparative study about the treatment efficacies with KTP and Nd:YAG lasers for cherry angiomas. Objective: To compare the efficacy and side effects of 532-nm KTP and 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers for the treatment of cherry angiomas. Methods: Two comparable lesions of the same patient were chosen. One of them was treated with the KTP laser while the other was treated with the Nd:YAG laser. Sessions were repeated every 4 weeks until complete clearance was achieved. Side effects were evaluated using a severity scale (0 to 4). Results: The number of sessions was significantly higher with the KTP than with the Nd:YAG laser (p = 0.002). Erythema, edema, pain and scar formation were higher in the Nd:YAG laser group (erythema: p = 0.001; edema: p < 0.001; pain: p < 0.001; scar: p < 0.001). The hyperpigmentation rate was statistically higher with the KTP laser (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Both KTP and Nd:YAG lasers were found to be effective methods. The Nd:YAG laser offered fewer treatment sessions, but a higher risk of scar formation. The KTP laser seems more advantageous, but in dark-skinned patients the Nd:YAG laser may be preferable.     

Intradermal tranexamic acid injections to prevent post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation after solar lentigo removal with a Q-switched 532-nm Nd:YAG laser

Introduction: Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) after solar lentigo removal using a Q-switched (QS) 532-nm Nd:YAG laser is a cause for concern. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intradermal injections of tranexamic acid (TA) at reducing the risk of PIH after QS 532-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines. Methods: Twenty-five patients with 50 solar lentigines on forearms underwent QS 532-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment. Then, TA (50 mg/mL) was injected randomly into one lesion and 0.9% normal saline was injected intradermally into another lesion. Two blinded dermatologists and a Mexameter® evaluated photographs at baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Results: At the end of the study, the mean melanin index (MI) had decreased significantly in both groups. The TA group showed a significant reduction in the mean MI compared with that in the control group at week 4 (p = 0.025). The overall PIH rates were 16% and 28% in the TA and control groups, respectively. The side effects of TA were minimal and they were resolved within 1 h. Conclusion: Single dose of intradermal TA (50 mg/mL) injected can reduce the risk of developing PIH 4 weeks after 532-nm QS Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines.     

Efficacy and safety of 1064‐nm Q‐switched Nd:YAG laser with low fluence for keloids and hypertrophic scars

Background Several treatment modalities using laser devices have been used for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with various therapeutic outcomes. Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of 1064‐nm Q‐switched (QS) Nd:YAG laser with low fluence on keloids and hypertrophic scars. Methods Keloids and hypertrophic scars located at 21 anatomic sites in 12 Korean patients (10 men and 2 women; mean age 23.8 years, range 21–33) were treated using 1064‐nm QS Nd:YAG laser with low fluence at 1–2 week intervals. Treatment settings were 1.8–2.2 J/cm², 7‐mm spot size and 5–6 passes with appropriate overlapping. Results Follow‐up data collected 3 months after the final treatment revealed decreases in the mean score for the following lesion characteristics: pigmentation from 1.8 to 1.2; vascularity from 1.4 to 1.0; pliability from 3.0 to 2.0 and height from 2.3 to 1.8. The modified Vancouver General Hospital Burn Scar Assessment score decreased from 8.6 to 5.9 (P < 0.0001). Observed side‐effects were a mild prickling sensation during treatment, and mild post‐treatment erythema, both of which resolved within few hours. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that QS Nd:YAG laser with low fluence may be used for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.     

大光斑低能量Q开关1064nm Nd:YAG激光治疗雀斑

目的:评价大光斑低能量模式Q开关1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗雀斑的疗效和安全性。方法:应用大光斑低能量模式Q开关1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗15例成人女性雀斑患者。治疗参数:波长1064 nm,脉宽10 ns,光斑7 mm,能量密度1.5~2.0 J/cm2,频率10 hz,每2~3周一次,治疗3~5次。末次治疗结束后随访6个月。结果:8例患者76%~100%皮损颜色变淡,4例51%~75%皮损颜色变淡,3例26%~50%皮损颜色变淡。所有患者治疗后仅有轻微红斑,数小时内消退,治疗后无色沉发生。随访6个月后2例患者复发。结论:大光斑低能量Q开关1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗雀斑安全有效。     

A split-face,evaluator-blind randomized study on the early effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser versus Er:YAG micropeel in light solar lentigines in Asians

Abstract

Background: Asians are prone to develop epidermal pigmentary lesions as a result of photoaging. Solar lentigines, especially those which are light in color, show somewhat limited response to pigment lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Objectives: We sought to compare the early effects as well as side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG and Er:YAG micropeel in treating light solar lentigines in Asians. Patient and methods: This was a split-face, evaluator-blind, randomized controlled study. A single session of treatment was performed on Asian patients with light facial lentigines. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser was allocated to one half of the face, and Er:YAG micropeel to the other half. The response to therapy was evaluated by two independent dermatologists with standardized photographs taken 2 weeks and 1 month after the laser treatment. Patients’ satisfaction and preference in treatment were also assessed. Results: Fifteen patients completed the study and were analyzed. A reduction in pigment was observed with both lasers during the study period. The degree of pigment reduction in the Q-switched Nd:YAG treated side of the face was significantly higher than that of the Er:YAG micropeel treated side at 2-week follow-up (p < 0.001). The degree of pigment reduction between the Q-switched Nd:YAG-treated side and the Er:YAG micropeel-treated side was similar at 1-month follow-up (p = 0.110). Conclusion: While there is no perfect therapy for light solar lentigines, a single session of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and Er:YAG micropeel was shown to reduce pigmentation. The immediate effects (2-week follow-up) were better with the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser but there was no great difference between the two laser types at 1-month follow-up due to the greater degree of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation following Q-switched Nd:YAG. Both laser types could be applied either singly in turns, or in combination for maximal efficacy in future.     

Pulsed dye laser versus long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloid: A comparative randomized split-scar trial

Introduction: Keloids and hypertrophic scars are benign fibrous growths that occur after trauma or wounding of the skin and present a major therapeutic problem. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of pulsed dye laser (PDL) versus Nd:YAG laser in hypertrophic scar and keloid. Methods: Twenty patients with hypertrophic scars and keloid were included in this prospective, randomized, split-scar study. Half of each scar was randomized to treatment with a 595-nm PDL and the contralateral half with the 1064-nm Nd:YAG. Each patient received 6 laser treatment sessions at 1-month intervals. The scars were evaluated at baseline and one month after the last laser session using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS). Results: One month after the last laser treatment, final total VSS analysis of treated sites by PDL and long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser revealed significant improvements (p < 0.001), whereas the average percentage of improvement in the total VSS was 55.14% for PDL and 65.44% for Nd:YAG laser. However, there were no statistically significant differences between PDL- and long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-treated sites for total VSS (p = 0.074). Limitations: This was a single-center non-controlled trial, which included a small number of patients and subjective outcome measures. Conclusion: PDL and long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatments for keloid and hypertrophic scar provide significant improvement with insignificant difference between both modalities.