Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston-Northwestern twin sisters study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for anal incontinence using an identical twin sisters study design to provide control over genetic variance. METHODS: A total of 271 identical twin sister pairs (mean age 47 years) completed the validated Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory questionnaire detailing the presence and severity of anal incontinence. Data were analyzed using a stepwise logistic regression with repeated binary measures to account for correlated data within twin pairs. Three different statistical models were used to analyze nonobstetric as well as obstetric risk factors separately. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for anal incontinence and higher Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory anal incontinence subscale scores included age 40 years or older (fecal: odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-6.0; flatal: OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.11-3.24), menopause (fecal: OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.15-3.8; flatal: OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.43-3.13), increasing parity (parity > or = 2; fecal: OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.25-7.65; flatal: OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.51), and the presence of stress urinary incontinence (fecal: OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.98; flatal: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.14-2.59). Obesity was associated with significantly higher Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory anal incontinence subscale scores (mean difference 5.18, P = .007). Cesarean delivery after initiation of labor was associated with a lower prevalence of anal incontinence than vaginal birth; however, this difference was not statistically significant (17% compared with 4%, P = .11). No anal incontinence was noted in women who had only elective cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION: Age, menopause, obesity, parity, and stress urinary incontinence are the major risk factors for female anal incontinence.     

Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of anal sphincter damage following delivery in the development of anorectal complaints and urinary incontinence, and to identify obstetric factors associated with subsequent fecal incontinence. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study with matched controls used a postal questionnaire and analysis of delivery and operation records from all women who underwent primary repair of a third or fourth degree perineal rupture in our hospital between 1971 and 1991, and their controls, matched for date and parity. Frequencies of complaints were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio [OR] for matched-control studies. Obstetric risk factors for fecal incontinence were assessed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In the period studied, 171 women underwent a primary repair. One hundred and forty-seven of which returned the questionnaire (86%), compared with 131 of the controls (73%). Analysis was performed on 125 matched pairs with a median follow-up of 14 years. Fecal incontinence was reported by 39 patients and 16 controls (OR: 3.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.57-6.10). Urinary incontinence was reported by 65 cases and 52 controls (OR:1.46; 95% CI: 0.91-2.37). Among women with anal sphincter damage, the extent of anal sphincter damage was an independent risk factor for fecal incontinence. (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.45-4.45). Subsequent vaginal delivery was not associated with the development of fecal incontinence (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 0.85-6.33). In primiparous women mediolateral episiotomy protected for fecal incontinence after anal sphincter damage (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter damage following delivery is significantly associated with subsequent anorectal complaints, but not with urinary incontinence. The extent of sphincter damage is an independent risk factor for the development of fecal incontinence. Mediolateral episiotomy protects for fecal incontinence in primiparous women.     

Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair.

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears and to evaluate symptomatic outcome of primary repair. METHODS: Obstetric-procedure, maternal, and fetal data were registered in 845 consecutive vaginally delivered women. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears were calculated by multiple logistic regression. All 808 Swedish-speaking women who delivered vaginally were included in a questionnaire study regarding anal incontinence in relation to the delivery. Questionnaires were distributed within the first few days postpartum, and at 5 and 9 months postpartum. RESULTS: Six percent of the women had a clinically detected sphincter tear at delivery. Sphincter tears were associated with nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6, 26.2), postmaturity (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0, 6.2), fundal pressure (OR 4.6 95% CI 2.3, 7.9), midline episiotomy (OR 5.5 95% CI 1.4,18.7), and fetal weight in intervals of 250 g (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1, 1.6). Fifty-four percent of women with repaired sphincter tears suffered from fecal or gas incontinence or both at 5 months and 41% at 9 months. Most of the symptoms were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for sphincter tear were identified. Sphincter tear at vaginal delivery is a serious complication, and it is frequently associated with anal incontinence. Special attention should be directed toward risk factors for this complication. Symptoms of anal incontinence should explicitly be sought at follow-up after delivery.     

Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The long-term prevalence of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery is unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of anal incontinence in primiparous women 5 years after their first delivery and to evaluate the influence of subsequent childbirth. METHODS: A total of 349 nulliparous women were prospectively followed up with questionnaires before pregnancy, at 5 and 9 months, and 5 years after delivery. A total of 242 women completed all questionnaires. Women with sphincter tear at their first delivery were compared with women without such injury. Risk factors for development of anal incontinence were also analyzed. RESULTS: Anal incontinence increased significantly during the study period. Among women with sphincter tears, 44% reported anal incontinence at 9 months and 53% at 5 years (P = .002). Twenty-five percent of women without a sphincter tear reported anal incontinence at 9 months and 32% had symptoms at 5 years (P < .001). Risk factors for anal incontinence at 5 years were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2), sphincter tear (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-5.0), and subsequent childbirth (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.6). As a predictor of anal incontinence at 5 years after the first delivery, anal incontinence at both 5 months (OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.0-7.3) and 9 months (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.2-8.2) was identified. Among women with symptoms, the majority had infrequent incontinence to flatus, whereas fecal incontinence was rare. CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence among primiparous women increases over time and is affected by further childbirth. Anal incontinence at 9 months postpartum is an important predictor of persisting symptoms.     

Flatus and faecal incontinence: prevalence and risk factors at 16 weeks of gestation

Objective To evaluate the prevalence of anal incontinence at 16 weeks of gestation and to identify possible maternal and obstetrical risk factors.
Design Cross sectional study and cohort study.
Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Participants Cross sectional study: 7557 women attending antenatal care. Cohort study: a subgroup of 1726 pregnant women with one previous delivery at our department.
Results The prevalence of anal incontinence within the preceding year was 8.6%. Incontinence of liquid and solid stools was reported in 2.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Isolated flatus incontinence at least once a week was reported in 4.2%. The risk of flatus incontinence at least once a week was increased with age > 35 years (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.4) and with previous lower abdominal or urological surgery (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.1) in a logistic regression model controlling for maternal factors. Increasing parity did not increase the risk. The risk of flatus incontinence was increased after anal sphincter tear and birthweight > 4000 g in a logistic regression model controlling for maternal and obstetric variables. Episiotomy was insignificantly associated, while spontaneous perineal tear > 3 cm and a number of other intrapartum factors were not associated.
Conclusion True faecal incontinence is rare among younger women. However, an age > 35 years and previous lower abdominal or urological surgery increased the risk of flatus incontinence in contrast to increasing parity. This suggests that childbirth plays a minor role compared with age. However, when analysing obstetric variables separately, a birthweight > 4000 g, and anal sphincter tears were significant risk factors for flatus incontinence.     

Urinary and anal incontinence in morbidly obese women considering weight loss surgery

OBJECTIVE: To estimate prevalence and correlates of urinary and anal incontinence in morbidly obese women undergoing evaluation for laparoscopic weight loss surgery. METHODS: From October 2003 to February 2005, 180 women with body mass index (BMI) of 40 or greater underwent evaluation for laparoscopic weight loss surgery. Using an established Web site, questionnaires were completed to assess symptoms of urinary incontinence, including the Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire (MESA). Anal incontinence was assessed by asking, "Do you have any uncontrolled anal leakage?" A number of clinical and demographic variables were examined as potential risk factors for urinary incontinence and anal incontinence. RESULTS: Mean age was 39.8 years (range 16-55). Body mass index ranged from 40 to 81 (mean 49.5). Prevalence of urinary incontinence was 66.9% and anal incontinence was 32.0% (45.6% loss of gas only, 21.1% liquid stool only, 24.6% gas and liquid stool only, 8.8% solid stool). In simple logistic regression, presence of urinary incontinence was associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.09), number of children (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.07), anal incontinence (OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.52-15.93), arthritis (OR 6.04, 95% CI 1.76-20.78), and sleep apnea (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.21-4.37). Multivariable logistic regression identified 3 factors independently associated with urinary incontinence: number of children (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12-2.12), arthritis (OR 5.46, 95% CI 1.51-19.73), and anal incontinence (OR 6.27, 95% CI 2.42-16.26). Presence of anal incontinence was associated only with the presence of urinary incontinence (OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.52-15.93). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of urinary and anal incontinence is high in this group of morbidly obese women as compared with the general population. Studies are needed to determine the effect of weight loss on urinary and anal incontinence symptoms in the morbidly obese woman.     

Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Heart & Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Before enrollment in a 4-year, randomized trial of combination hormone therapy to prevent coronary heart disease, 2763 participants completed questionnaires on prevalence and type of incontinence. We measured factors potentially associated with incontinence including demographics, reproductive and medical histories, height, weight, and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. We used multivariate logistic models to determine independent associations between those factors and weekly incontinence by type. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) age of the participants was 67+/-7 years; 89% were white and 8% were black. Fifty-six percent reported weekly incontinence. In multivariate analyses, the prevalence of weekly stress incontinence was higher in white than black women (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 5.1), in women with higher body-mass index (BMI) (OR 1.1 per 5 units, 95% CI 1.0, 1.3), and higher waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.2 per 0.1 unit, 95% CI 1.0, 1.4). The prevalence of weekly urge incontinence was higher in older women (OR 1.2 per 5 years, 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), diabetic women (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 2.0) and women who had reported two or more urinary tract infections in the prior year (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1, 3.6). CONCLUSION: Stress and urge incontinence are common in postmenopausal women and have different risk factors, suggesting that approaches to risk-factor modification and prevention also might differ and should be specific to types of incontinence.     

Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors and prevalence of anal incontinence among women with pelvic floor dysfunctions. METHODS: We evaluated 881 women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and/or genital prolapse. Each completed a bowel questionnaire and underwent a detailed medical, surgical, obstetric, and gynecologic history, and a pelvic examination. Additional testing, when indicated, included office cystometry or multichannel urodynamic evaluation. Multivariable analysis using logistic regression was used to test the overall significance of all variables significantly associated with anal incontinence, using univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 178 women had anal incontinence (20%). These patients were on average older, had a greater body mass index, and had larger birth weight infants than their anal-continent counterparts; 511 were diagnosed with urinary incontinence, and 122 (24%) also had anal incontinence. Women with urinary incontinence were more likely to report anal incontinence events than women continent of urine (24% versus 15%, P =.002). The following associations were found with anal incontinence: infant with birth weight 3800 g or greater (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 2.2), rectocele greater than grade 2 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 3.3), urinary incontinence (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3, 2.8), hemorrhoidectomy (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1, 7.0), irritable bowel syndrome (OR 6.3, 95% CI 3.5, 11.5). CONCLUSION: Among women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, the prevalence of anal incontinence was 20%. Urinary incontinence and severe rectocele were found to be associated with anal incontinence.     

Risk factors for anal sphincter tear in multiparas

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal, newborn, and obstetric risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear in multiparous women. METHODS: This case-control study identified 18,779 multiparous vaginal deliveries from 1992 to 2004 from an obstetric automated record database at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Two hundred eighty-four patients were selected, 145 cases and 139 controls. Variables from the index pregnancy and prior pregnancies were analyzed, and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine significant predictor variables for anal sphincter tear in multiparous women. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five multiparous women with no history of cesarean delivery sustained a sphincter tear. Multivariable logistic regression showed a significant association with episiotomy (odds ratio [OR] 16.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.7-34.4), shoulder dystocia (OR 7.9, CI 1.6-38), forceps delivery (OR 4.7, CI 2.0-11.2), and being married (OR 2.2, CI 1.1-4.6). A second exploratory model that included variables from previous pregnancies, showed that in addition to episiotomy (OR 34.6, CI 8.8-136), shoulder dystocia (OR 11.1, CI 1.3-95.2), forceps delivery (OR 6.1, CI 1.6-23.5), previous sphincter tear (OR 7.7, CI 1.2-48.7), and second stage of labor greater than 1 hour (OR 6.7, CI 1.1-42.5) were associated with tear. CONCLUSION: The strongest clinical risk factors for anal sphincter tear in multiparous women are episiotomy, shoulder dystocia, previous sphincter tear, prolonged second stage of labor, and forceps delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40 to 60 years of age

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and possible associated risk factors in women 40-60 years old. METHODS: In a normal population study, 502 women with lower urinary tract symptoms and 742 women with no symptoms (controls) were asked about possible associated factors. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven women (97.0%) with symptoms and 564 controls (76.0%) completed the study. Stress incontinence was associated with parity (primipara odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 4. 9; para 2 OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.9, 8.0; para 3 OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.1, 9.5), use of diuretics (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9), hysterectomy (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6, 3.7), and increased body mass index (BMI). Urge incontinence was associated with use of diuretics (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2. 2, 7.1) and BMI. Urgency was associated with parity (primipara OR 1. 9, 95% CI 0.9, 4.2; para 2 OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5, 5.9; para 3 OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 6.5), use of diuretics (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5, 4.7) and BMI. Associations between non-incontinence symptoms (except urgency) and observed factors were weak and inconsistent. Straining at stool and constipation were inversely associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. Overall, lesion of sphincter ani, episiotomy, fetal weight, physical activity, and hormonal status had minor association with lower urinary tract symptoms. CONCLUSION: Lower urinary tract symptoms were associated positively with parity, BMI, prior hysterectomy, use of diuretics, straining at stool, and constipation.     

Changes in urinary and fecal incontinence symptoms with weight loss surgery in morbidly obese women

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence in morbidly obese women undergoing laparoscopic weight loss surgery. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 101 women (aged 20-55 years) with body mass index (BMI) of 40 or more underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and were followed to 6 and 12 months. Presence, severity, and effect of UI were assessed using the Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire, Urogenital Distress Inventory, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Fecal incontinence was assessed by self-report of anal leakage. RESULTS: Mean BMI decreased from 48.9+/-7.2 presurgery to 35.3+/-6.5 at 6 months and 30.2+/-5.7 at 12 months postsurgery. Prevalence of UI decreased from 66.7% presurgery to 41.0% at 6 months and 37.0% at 12 months (P<.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] for change 18.6-40.0%). Reduction in prevalence of UI was significantly associated with decreases in BMI (P=.01). Among incontinent women who lost 18 or more BMI points, 71% regained urinary continence at 12 months. Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire urge and stress scores decreased (both P<.001; 95% CI 0.5-1.85 and 2.71-5.34, respectively), as did scores on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (P<.001; 95% CI 8.31-16.21) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (P<.001; 95% CI 4.71-14.60), indicating reduction in severity. Prevalence of fecal incontinence (solid or liquid stool) decreased from 19.4% to 9.1% at 6 months and 8.6% at 12 months (P=.018; 95% CI 2.1-19.4%). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of UI and fecal incontinence decreased after bariatric surgery. Magnitude of weight loss was associated with reduction in UI prevalence, strengthening the inference that improvements are attributable to weight loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

北京市成年女性粪失禁患病率调查

目的 调查北京市成年女性粪失禁(FI)的患病率,分析FI患病的影响因素.方法 采用分层多阶段系统抽样的方法,应用自填式问卷,对北京市6个区(县)20岁及以上成年女性进行问卷调查.结果 本研究符合条件的调查对象共3058例,年龄在20～79岁之间,平均(48±16)岁.北京市成年女性FI患病率为1.28%(39/3058),FI患病率随年龄增加而升高(P＜0.01).多因素非条件logistic回归分析显示,5个因素进入回归方程,分别为:年龄≥40岁(OR值为3.3,95%CI:1.7～6.8)、患尿失禁(OR值为3.0,95%CI:1.5～6.1)、自然分娩(OR值为2.4,95%CI:1.2～4.9)、家庭人均月收入≤2000元(OR值为3.3,95%CI:1.6～6.5)、经常感到疲劳(OR值为3.0,95%CI:1.5～5.8).结论 北京市成年女性FI患病率不高,但影响因素复杂,应该进一步开展相关研究.     

Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery and to identify opportunities for preventing this cause of fecal incontinence in young women. METHODS: We used baseline data from two groups of women who participated in the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms (CAPS) study: those women who delivered vaginally, either those with or those without a recognized anal sphincter tear. Univariable analyses of demographic and obstetric information identified factors associated with anal sphincter tear. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these factors alone and in combination, adjusted for maternal age, race, and gestational age. RESULTS: We included data from 797 primaparous women: 407 with a recognized anal sphincter tear and 390 without. Based on univariable analysis, a woman with a sphincter tear was more likely to be older, to be white, to have longer gestation or prolonged second stage of labor, to have a larger infant (birth weight/head circumference), or an infant who was in occiput posterior position, or to have an episiotomy or operative delivery. Logistic regression found forceps delivery (OR 13.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9-23.2) and episiotomy (OR 5.3, 95% CI 3.8-7.6) were strongly associated with a sphincter tear. The combination of forceps and episiotomy was markedly associated with sphincter tear (OR 25.3, 95% CI 10.2-62.6). The addition of epidural anesthesia to forceps and episiotomy increased the OR to 41.0 (95% CI 13.5-124.4). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the existence of modifiable obstetric interventions that increase the risk of anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. Our results may be used by clinicians and women to help inform their decisions regarding obstetric interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate, obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based study comparing all singleton deliveries between the years 1988 and 1999 in women with and without uterine leiomyomas was performed. Patients lacking prenatal care were excluded from the analysis. Multivariable analysis, adjusting for possible confounders, such as maternal age, parity and gestational age, was performed to investigate associations between uterine leiomyomas and selected outcomes. RESULTS: There were 105,909 singleton deliveries with 690 (0.65%) complicated by uterine leiomyomas during the study period. Using a multivariable analysis, the following conditions were significantly associated with uterine leiomyomas: nulliparity (odds ratio [OR]=4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-4.7, P<.001), chronic hypertension (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.4, P<.001), hydramnios (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, P<.001), diabetes mellitus (OR=1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, P=.001) and advanced maternal age (OR=1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, P<.001). Higher rates of perinatal mortality (2.2% vs. 1.2%, OR=1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, P<.001) were found in the uterine leiomyoma group as compared to the control group. While adjusting for maternal age, parity, gestational age and malpresentation, pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas had higher rates of cesarean deliveries (OR=6.7, 95% CI 5.5-8.1, P<.001), placental abruption (OR=2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.2, P<.001) and preterm deliveries (<36 weeks' gestation, OR=1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, P=.009) as compared to pregnancies without uterine leiomyomas. Conversely, no significant differences were noted regarding perinatal mortality (OR=1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.8, P=.351) after controlling for maternal age, parity and gestational age using a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Uterine leiomyomas increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, thus emphasizing the importance of appropriate intrapartum management of these high-risk pregnancies.     

Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that a history of subfertility is associated with increased obstetric and perinatal risks. It is unclear if the cause is inherent characteristics in the women or the fertility treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the obstetric and perinatal risks of singleton pregnancies in women with a history of subfertility in comparison with the general population. DESIGN: Population cohort. SETTING: Aberdeen, Scotland. POPULATION: Cases were women attending the Fertility Clinic between 1989 and 1999 who subsequently went on to have singleton pregnancies. Controls included the general population of women who delivered singletons over the same period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies in women with subfertility. The general population of women who delivered singletons over the same period served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetric and perinatal complications in singleton pregnancies. RESULTS: Maternity records were available for a total of 1437 subfertile women and 21,688 controls. Subfertile women were older [mean (SD) age: 31 (4.7) years vs 27 (5.4) years, P < 0.01] and more likely to be primiparous (70% vs 65%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age and parity, subfertile women were at increased risk of pre-eclampsia (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5), placenta praevia (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.2-7.0) and placental abruption (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), and more likely to undergo induction of labour (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.6), caesarean section (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.4) and instrumental delivery (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.6), and deliver low birthweight (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.7) and preterm (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) infants. There were no differences between treatment-related and treatment-independent pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Subfertile women are at higher risk of obstetric complications, which persist after adjusting for age and parity.     

Predictors of urinary incontinence in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess risk factors associated with occurrence of urinary incontinence among postmenopausal women. METHODS: We followed up 1,017 postmenopausal health maintenance organization enrollees, aged 55 to 75 years, for 2 years. The primary outcome measures were any urinary incontinence and severe incontinence reported at 12- or 24-month follow-up visits. RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of any amount or frequency of urinary incontinence in the past year was 66%. Among the 345 women without incontinence at baseline, 65 (19%) at 1 year and 66 (19%) at 2 years reported any incontinence. Ninety-two of 672 (14%) and 96 of 672 (14%) women with incontinence at baseline reported no incontinence at years 1 and 2. In an adjusted multiple logistic regression model, independent predictors of any incontinence included white race (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.6), vaginal estrogen cream (OR 2.0, CI 1.1-3.7), vaginal dryness (OR 1.6, CI 1.2-2.2), vaginal discharge (OR 1.5, CI 1.0-2.2), 6 or more lifetime urinary tract infections (OR 1.8, CI 1.2-2.6), and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (OR 1.7, CI 1.0-3.1). In adjusted models, predictors of severe incontinence were history of hysterectomy (OR 1.8, CI 1.1-2.7) and any vaginal symptom (OR 1.7, CI 1.0-2.8). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of incontinence-free postmenopausal women developed urinary incontinence during 2 years of follow-up. Because vaginal symptoms are associated with urinary incontinence, their relationship with other risk factors, including vaginal Escherichia coli colonization and vaginal estrogen cream use, warrant additional study. Similarly, diabetic peripheral neuropathy and hysterectomy associations suggest areas for future investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae

OBJECTIVE: To identify obstetric and other risk factors for urinary incontinence that occurs during pregnancy or after childbirth. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of women. SETTING: Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand). POPULATION: A total of 3405 primiparous women with singleton births delivered during 1 year. METHODS: Questionnaire responses and obstetric case note data were analysed using multivariate analysis to identify associations with urinary incontinence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary incontinence at 3 months after delivery first starting in pregnancy or after birth. RESULTS: The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 29%. New incontinence first beginning after delivery was associated with older maternal age (oldest versus youngest group, OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.35-3.02) and method of delivery (caesarean section versus spontaneous vaginal delivery, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19-0.41). There were no significant associations with forceps delivery (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.92-1.51) or vacuum delivery (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.83-1.63). Incontinence first occurring during pregnancy and still present at 3 months was associated with higher maternal body mass index (BMI>25, OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.16-2.43) and heavier babies (birthweight in top quartile, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12-2.19). In these women, caesarean section was associated with less incontinence (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.58) but incontinence was not associated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Women have less urinary incontinence after a first delivery by caesarean section whether or not that first starts during pregnancy. Older maternal age was associated with new postnatal incontinence, and higher BMI and heavier babies with incontinence first starting during pregnancy. The effect of further deliveries may modify these findings.     

Urinary incontinence: prevalence and risk factors at 16 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of urinary incontinence at 16 weeks of gestation and to identify possible maternal and obstetric risk factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and cohort study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. POPULATION: Cross-sectional study: 7795 women attending antenatal care. Cohort study: a sub-group of 1781 pregnant women with one previous delivery at our department. RESULTS: Prevalence and maternal risk factors: the prevalence of urinary incontinence within the preceding year was 8.9% among women at 16 weeks of gestation (nulliparae, 3.9%, para 1, 13.8%, para 2+, 16.2%). Stress or mixed incontinence occurred at least weekly in 3% of all the women. After adjusting for age, parity, body mass index, smoking, previous abortions, and previous lower abdominal or urological surgery in a logistic regression model, primiparous women who had delivered vaginally had higher risk of stress or mixed urinary incontinence than nulliparous women (OR 5.7; 95% CI 3.9-8.3). Subsequent vaginal deliveries did not increase the risk significantly. Young age, body mass index > 30, and smoking were possible risk factors for developing urinary incontinence. Obstetric factors: weight of the newborn > 4000 g (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.6) increased the risk of urinary incontinence; mediolateral episiotomy in combination with birthweight > 4000 g also increased the risk (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.2-10.2); a number of other intrapartum factors did not increase the risk of urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The first vaginal delivery was a major risk factor for developing urinary incontinence; subsequent vaginal deliveries did not increase the risk significantly. Birthweight > 4000 g increased the risk; episiotomy in combination with birthweight > 4000 g also increased the risk.     

Perinatal factors associated with cerebral palsy in children born in Sweden

OBJECTIVE: To identify perinatal factors associated with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: This was a case-control study based on the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and the Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry, including 2,303 infants born in Sweden 1984-1998 with a diagnosis of CP and 1.6 million infants without this diagnosis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Infants born preterm had a highly increased risk for CP, and constituted 35% of all cases; OR 34 (95% CI 29-39) in weeks 23-27, OR 37 (95% CI 32-42) in weeks 28-29, OR 26 (95% CI 23-30) in weeks 30-31, and OR 3.9 (95% CI 3.4-4.4) in weeks 32-36. Boys had a higher risk (sex ratio 1.36:1), particularly before term (sex ratio 1.55:1). Other factors associated with CP were being small or large for gestational age at birth, abruptio placentae (OR 8.6, 95% CI 5.6-13.3), maternal insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type 1 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1), preeclampsia (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-2.4), being a twin (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), maternal age older than 40 years (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8) or 35-39 years (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), primiparity (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3), and smoking (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3). In term infants, low Apgar scores were associated with a high risk for CP; OR 62 (95% CI 52-74) at score 6 at 5 minutes, OR 498 (95% CI 458-542) at score 3. Other factors associated with CP in term infants were breech presentation at vaginal birth (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4-3.7), instrumental delivery (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3), and emergency cesarean delivery (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-2.0). CONCLUSION: Preterm birth entails a high risk for CP, but 65% of these children are born at term. Several obstetric factors and low Apgar scores are associated with CP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Incontinence severity and major depression in incontinent women

OBJECTIVE: Research has shown an association between urinary incontinence and depression. Studies that use community-based samples and major depressive disorder diagnostic criteria are needed. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with major depression in women with urinary incontinence. METHODS: We conducted an age-stratified postal survey of 6,000 women aged 30-90 years. Subjects were randomly selected from enrollees in a large health maintenance organization in Washington state. Main outcome measures were prevalence of current major depression and adjusted odds ratios for factors associated with major depression in women with urinary incontinence. RESULTS: The response rate was 64% (n = 3,536) after applying exclusion criteria. The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 42% (n = 1,458). The prevalence of major depression was 3.7% (n = 129), with 2.2% in those without incontinence versus 6.1% in those with incontinence. Among women with incontinence, major depression prevalence rates differed by incontinence severity (2.1% in mild, 5.7% in moderate, and 8.3% in severe) and incontinence type (4.7% in stress, 6.6% in urge/mixed). Obesity (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-4.0), current smoking (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.9), lower educational attainment (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3), moderate incontinence (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.6), and severe incontinence (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-9.1) were each associated with increased odds of major depression in women with urinary incontinence, controlling for age and medical comorbidity. Compared with women with incontinence alone, women with comorbid incontinence and major depression had significantly greater decrements in quality of life and functional status and increased incontinence symptom burden. CONCLUSION: Women with moderate-to-severe urinary incontinence should be screened for comorbid major depression and offered treatment if depression is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.