The effect of food on the bioavailability of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol from norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol tablets intended for continuous hormone replacement therapy

As part of the development of a combination product containing norethindrone acetate and low-dose ethinyl estradiol for continuous hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, a study was conducted to determine the effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol from tablets containing 1 mg norethindrone acetate/10 micrograms ethinyl estradiol. Eighteen healthy postmenopausal women participated in an open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover study in which 2 x 1/10 norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol tablets were administered fasting and with a high-fat breakfast, and the same dose was administered in solution. Following each treatment, serial blood samples were collected for 48 hours, and plasma ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone concentrations were determined by a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. Individual plasma ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods for each treatment and analyzed by ANOVA to obtain differences between least squares treatment mean values and associated 90% confidence intervals. Rates of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone availability from tablets administered with food were slower than availability rates from tablets administered while fasting. Systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol was unaffected by administration of tablets with food, whereas exposure to norethindrone increased by 27%. Because administration of norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol 1/10 tablets with a high-fat meal did not decrease systemic exposure to norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, this formulation can be taken without regard to meals.     

Pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a combined contraceptive vaginal ring

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) releasing etonogestrel 120microg and ethinylestradiol 15 microg per day and compare them with those of a combined oral contraceptive containing desogestrel 150 microg/ethinylestradiol 30 microg (DSG/EE COC). DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a nonblind, randomised, crossover study in 16 healthy women. METHODS: All volunteers received one cycle of DSG/EE COC before being randomised to 1 of 2 treatment groups. The participants in group 1 received 1 cycle of DSG/EE COC, a treatment period with NuvaRing and an intravenous bolus injection of etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol (150 microg/30 microg). Those in group 2 received a NuvaRing treatment period, 1 cycle of DSG/EE COC and the same intravenous bolus injection. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After the insertion of NuvaRing, maximum serum concentrations of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol were achieved in approximately 1 week. The concentrations subsequently showed a gradual linear decrease in time. The maximum serum concentrations of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol were approximately 40 and 30%, respectively, of those for the DSG/EE COC. In comparison with the DSG/EE COC, the absolute bioavailability for NuvaRing was higher for etonogestrel (102.9 vs 79.2%) and similar for ethinylestradiol (55.6 vs 53.8%). Taking the difference in daily doses into account, systemic exposure to etonogestrel was similar for NuvaRing and the DSG/EE COC, whereas systemic exposure to ethinylestradiol with NuvaRing was only approximately 50% of that for the DSG/EE COC.     

Bioavailability and bioequivalence of etonogestrel from two oral formulations of desogestrel: Cerazette and Liseta.

In a three-period cross-over study with 24 healthy young females (study part 1), the bioavailability of etonogestrel (3-ketodesogestrel) was determined after a single oral dose of two Cerazette tablets (each containing 75 microg desogestrel), one Liseta tablet (containing 150 microg desogestrel and 1.5 mg 17beta-estradiol), and an intravenous dose of 150 microg etonogestrel. Etonogestrel serum levels from 23 subjects could be analysed by radio-immunoassay. The geometric mean bioavailability of etonogestrel from Cerazette and Liseta tablets was 0.79 and 0.82, with 95% confidence intervals of 0.73-0.86 and 0.76-0.88, respectively. Also, the oral formulations were found to be bioequivalent. Subsequently, the single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of etonogestrel from Cerazette tablets were compared with those after multiple dosing of one Cerazette tablet once daily for 7 days, in a subgroup of 12 subjects (study part 2). A steady state was observed from the fourth day of daily dosing onwards, with time-invariant parameters except for a 14% lower dose-normalised AUC. The least-squares geometric means of the elimination half-life of etonogestrel were approximately 30 h for the three single-dose treatments in study part 1, as well as for the single- and multiple-dose treatments of Cerazette in study part 2, without differences between groups.     

2种方案治疗生育期功能失调性子宫出血的最小成本分析

目的:比较去氧孕烯炔雌醇片和炔雌醇环丙孕酮片治疗生育期女性功能失调性子宫出血的疗效与成本。方法:选择95例生育期功能失调性子宫出血患者,运用药物经济学成本-效果分析方法,对去氧孕烯炔雌醇片和炔雌醇环丙孕酮片治疗方案的临床疗效及成本进行分析、比较。结果:去氧孕烯炔雌醇片和炔雌醇环丙孕酮片治疗生育期功能失调性子宫出血总有效率分别为98.08%和97.67%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);费用分别为(425.7±70.5)元和(515.5±88.2)元,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:去氧孕烯炔雌醇片治疗生育期女性功能失调性子宫出血疗效较好,且更为经济。     

Desogestrel, a new progestational compound, and the liver

The short- and long-term effects on the liver of oral contraceptive preparations containing the new progestational compound 13-ethyl-11-methylene-18,19-dinor-17 alpha-pregn-4-en-20-yn-17-ol (desogestrel) and ethinylestradiol (EE) were studied in multicentre efficacy trials. The following combinations (desogestrel/EE content per daily tablet in micrograms) were investigated: 150/30, 125/50, 100/50 and 75/50, to be taken once daily for 21 days, and a normophasic preparation containing 7 tablets with 50 micrograms EE and 15 tablets containing 125 micrograms desogestrel and 50 micrograms EE. Liver function parameters (SGOT, SGPT, alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin) were monitored in the serum of 1856 women for periods of up to 36 treatment cycles. The incidence of values (single and combined) above the upper normal limits before treatment was 3.3%. A combination of values above upper normal limits before treatment was observed in 31 women (1.6%). In practically all cases values normalized during treatment; no deterioration was observed. During treatment a combination of values above the upper normal limits was observed in 30 women (having normal pretreatment values); they were distributed over the various preparations and unrelated to the period of contraceptive treatment. The values normalized in the majority of women during the course of treatment. This study shows that with oral contraceptive combinations containing desogestrel and EE (30 or 50 micrograms) liver function is not affected.     

Bioequivalence assessment of three different estradiol formulations in postmenopausal women in an open, randomized, single-dose, 3-way cross-over study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the bioavailability of estradiol (E2) following oral, single-dose administration of equimolar doses of three HRT preparations in a 3-way cross-over study in postmenopausal women. METHODS: 18 healthy subjects were enrolled. Free E2 and estrone (E1) serum concentrations were determined using commercially available immunoassay kits. Bioequivalence testing was performed between the following oral formulations: (a) 1.5 mg E2 tablets versus 2 mg E2V tablets; and (b) 1.5 mg E2 plus 0.15 mg DSG tablets versus 1.5 mg E2 tablets. RESULTS: For both E2 and E1 the E2 tablet was bioequivalent with both the E2V and the E2/DSG tablet with respect to the rate and extent of absorption (bioavailability). Although the mean tmax values of the three tablet formulations were similar, the variability was too large to prove formal bioequivalence. CONCLUSION: E2 tablets and E2/DSG tablets were bioequivalent and also bioequivalence of E2 tablets with commercially available E2V was found, which ensures a sequential HRT preparation without large variations in estrogen serum concentrations.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of oral doses of rizatriptan 10 mg on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics in healthy female volunteers

Rizatriptan (MAXALT), a potent, oral 5-HT1B/1D agonist with a rapid onset of action, is available now for the acute treatment of migraine. This study examined the pharmacokinetic and clinical interaction between rizatriptan 10 mg and the components (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 35 micrograms and norethindrone [NET] 1.0 mg) of a well-established oral contraceptive combination product, ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. Levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a protein increased by EE to which NET binds, were also examined. In this two-period crossover study, 20 healthy young female subjects received a coadministration of 8 days of rizatriptan treatment (6 days of single-dose 10 mg rizatriptan and 2 days of multiple-dose rizatriptan, 10 mg q 4 hours for three doses, giving a total daily dose of 30 mg on Days 7 and 8) or matching placebo along with their daily dose (one tablet) of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 within their oral contraceptive cycle. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, and SHBG concentrations. Safety evaluations included routine laboratory safety studies, physical examinations, and monitoring for ECG, vital signs, and adverse events. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of EE or NET between the rizatriptan and placebo treatment periods, thus indicating that rizatriptan had no meaningful effect on the disposition of either the EE or the NET component of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The SHBG concentration did not change throughout the entire study. Clinically, coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 was well tolerated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature showed no consistent trend or clinically important changes. Adverse events following coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 were similar to those reported when placebo was given with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The findings of this study indicate that there is little potential for dosages as high as 30 mg/day, the maximum recommended dosing schedule, of rizatriptan to alter the plasma concentrations of oral contraceptives.     

Effect of raltegravir on estradiol and norgestimate plasma pharmacokinetics following oral contraceptive administration in healthy women

AIMS

Oral contraceptives such as norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol (Ortho Tri-Cyclen®) are commonly prescribed in the HIV-infected patient population. A placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the effect of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of the estrogen and progestin components of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol [ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of norgestimate (NGT)].

METHODS

In each of two periods, nineteen healthy women established on norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol contraception (21 days of active contraception; 7 days of placebo) received either 400 mg raltegravir or matching placebo twice daily on days 1–21. Pharmacokinetics were analysed on day 21 of each period.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the EE component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administrated with raltegravir relative to EE alone was 0.98 (0.93–1.04) for the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_{0–24 h}) and 1.06 (0.98–1.14) for the maximum concentration of drug in the plasma (C_max); the GMR (90% CI) for the NGMN component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administered with raltegravir relative to NGMN alone was 1.14 (1.08–1.21) for AUC_{0–24 h} and 1.29 (1.23–1.37) for C_max. There were no discontinuations due to a study drug-related adverse experience, nor any serious clinical or laboratory adverse experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltegravir has no clinically important effect on EE or NGMN pharmacokinetics. Co-administration of raltegravir and an oral contraceptive containing EE and NGT was generally well tolerated; no dose adjustment is required for oral contraceptives containing EE and NGT when co-administered with raltegravir.     

去氧孕烯炔雌醇治疗绝经过渡期功能失调性子宫出血的临床疗效及对血清性激素水平的影响

目的探讨去氧孕烯炔雌醇治疗绝经过渡期功能失调性子宫出血（功血）的临床疗效及对血清性激素水平的影响。方法选择2010年4月至2012年10月在本院治疗并确诊为绝经过渡期功血患者94例,随机分为观察组和对照组,各47例。观察组在诊断性刮宫术后3天给予去氧孕烯炔雌醇治疗,对照组在诊断l生刮宫术后3天给予醋酸甲羟孕酮片治疗。对比观察两组止血时间、临床疗效和药物不良反应。检测患者治疗前后促卵泡生成素（FSH）、黄体生成素（LH）、雌激素（E：）的水平。结果观察组临床疗效总有效率为97．87％,明显高于对照组53．19％,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;观察组控制出血时间和完全止血时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。治疗后观察组FSH水平明显下降,与对照组和本组治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;而LH、E：水平与治疗前比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。对照组治疗前后FSH、LH和E,的水平比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。对照组不良反应率高于观察组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论去氧孕烯炔雌醇在围绝经期功血患者止血中安全有效,值得临床应用。     

Effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of chronically administered oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

The effect of rofecoxib, a highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET), two common components of a combination oral contraceptive product, was examined. A double-blind, two-period crossover study was conducted in 18 healthy women who received ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35, a combination of EE (35 microg) and NET (1 mg), concurrently for 14 days with either 175 mg rofecoxib or matching placebo during two consecutive menstrual cycles. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and albumin. The AUC(0-24 h) geometric mean ratio (GMR: rofecoxib/placebo) with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) of EE and NET was 1.13 (1.06, 1.19) and 1.18 (1.13, 1.24), respectively. The Cmax GMR of EE and NET was 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) and 1.04 (0.99, 1.09), respectively. In each case, the 90% CIs satisfied the predefined bioequivalence limits of (0.80, 1.25). Measures of SHBG and albumin and routine clinical and laboratory safety parameters showed no clinically meaningful changes. The addition of rofecoxib to the oral contraceptive was not associated with any clinically important changes in EE or NET pharmacokinetics and thus would not be anticipated to influence the efficacy of this contraceptive regimen.     

Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) : relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 50 mg/mL oral suspension and 200mg and 800mg tablet formulations

PURPOSE: To investigate the bioavailability and bioequivalence of three different formulations of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093): 50 mg/mL oral suspension (test 1), 200mg tablets (test 2) and 800mg tablets (reference). DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Single-centre, open-label, randomised, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy subjects. The study consisted of three consecutive periods separated by a washout period of 7 days or more. Each subject received a single dose of eslicarbazepine acetate 800mg on three different occasions: 16mL of oral 50 mg/mL suspension, four 200mg tablets or one 800mg tablet. RESULTS: Eslicarbazepine acetate was rapidly and extensively metabolised to BIA 2-005. Maximum BIA 2-005 plasma concentrations (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinfinity) were, respectively (arithmetic mean +/- SD), 18.0 +/- 4.6 microg/mL and 325.7 +/- 64.9 microg x h/mL for test 1, 16.0 +/- 4.0 microg/mL and 304.2 +/- 66.0 microg x h/mL for test 2, and 17.0 +/- 4.1 microg/mL and 301.1 +/- 60.0 microg x h/mL for the reference formulation. Point estimate (PE) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUCinfinity test 1/reference geometric mean ratio were 1.09 and 1.01, 1.15; for Cmax ratio, PE and 90% CI were 1.07 and 0.97, 1.15. When test 2 and the reference formulations were compared, the PE and 90% CI were 0.99 and 0.94, 1.07 for the AUCinfinity ratio, and 0.94 and 0.86, 1.02 for the Cmax ratio. Bioequivalence of test versus reference formulations is thus accepted for both AUCinfinity and Cmax because the 90% CIs lie within the acceptance range of 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profiles of eslicarbazepine acetate oral 50 mg/mL suspension, 200mg tablet and 800mg tablet formulations were essentially similar, and the formulations can be considered bioequivalent.     

Concomitant administration of lumiracoxib and a triphasic oral contraceptive does not affect contraceptive activity or pharmacokinetic profile

This study evaluated the effect of lumiracoxib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN) in Triphasil-28 (a triphasic oral contraceptive). Females stabilized on Triphasil-28 continued on Triphasil-28 alone for another month (Treatment Period 1), then also received lumiracoxib (400 mg daily) or placebo for 28 days each (Periods 2 and 3) in a double-blind crossover design. Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed on Day 21 of Periods 2 and 3. Progesterone and plasma sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured before and 2 hours after Triphasil-28 administration on Day 21 of all three treatment periods. Lumiracoxib had no significant effect on EE or LN pharmacokinetics or on progesterone or SHBG concentrations, indicating that anovulation and Triphasil-28 effectiveness was maintained. Adverse events were similar for lumiracoxib and placebo. Therefore, no clinically important consequences are anticipated if lumiracoxib is coadministered with oral contraceptives containing EE or LN.     

Levetiracetam: relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of a 10% oral solution (750 mg) and 750-mg tablets

Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug, is used worldwide as an adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures. The availability of a new oral solution formulation would provide an additional treatment option for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets. A phase I single-center, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-dose study was conducted to confirm that a 10% oral solution of levetiracetam was bioequivalent to the 750-mg oral tablet and to characterize its pharmacokinetics. Each of 24 healthy subjects received a single oral 750-mg dose of the randomized levetiracetam formulation (7.5 mL of 10% solution or 750-mg tablet) on day 1 and a single oral dose of the alternate formulation on day 8. Serial blood samples were collected from 0 to 36 hours after each dose administration for determination of plasma levetiracetam concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two formulations was evaluated. The mean levetiracetam plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters essentially were identical for the oral 10% solution and tablet and consistent with previously reported levetiracetam pharmacokinetics. The 90% confidence limits of the geometric mean ratio of the two formulations for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable time point, and maximum plasma concentration were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating bioequivalence of the two formulations. Both levetiracetam formulations were well tolerated. The levetiracetam 10% oral solution is a bioequivalent, well-tolerated alternative to the tablet formulation in patients who have difficulty swallowing.     

Pulsed estrogen therapy: pharmacokinetics of intranasal 17-beta-estradiol (S21400) in postmenopausal women and comparison with oral and transdermal formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of estradiol and estrone were assessed in postmenopausal women receiving S21400, a novel 17beta-estradiol formulation administered by nasal route; the results were compared with those obtained with oral and transdermal routes. Thirty six women received three treatments: a specified dose of 17beta-estradiol (100, 300 or 450 microg) given once and as 2 doses, 12 h apart, using three parallel dose groups in a randomised, crossover study. Thereafter, a reservoir patch (50 microg/day of 17beta-estradiol) or a tablet of 2 mg micronised 17beta-estradiol were randomly administered. Plasma concentrations of estradiol and estrone were measured by radioimmunoassays. Following intranasal dosing, estradiol was rapidly absorbed with plasma concentrations reaching maximal values (approximately 1400 pg/ml with a single 300 microg dose) after 10-30 min and returning within 12 h to levels of untreated postmenopausal women. Systemic exposure to estradiol was dose proportional and independent of the treatment regimen. Moreover, the dose of 300 microg gave an estimated 24 h systemic exposure to exogenous estradiol close to that of the 50 microg/day reservoir patch or the 2 mg tablet. The mean estrone to estradiol ratio was similar and 4-fold lower than those with the patch and the tablet, respectively. In conclusion, by this new route for estrogen replacement therapy, the nasal route, the pharmacokinetics of estradiol as S21400 were linear and displayed a 'pulsed' kinetic profile, different from those obtained with the usual routes of administration.     

去氧孕烯炔雌醇片在人工流产术后预防官腔粘连的效果分析

目的研究去氧孕烯炔雌醇片在人工流产术后预防官腔粘连的效果。方法选择2009年3月～2013年3月本院接诊的100例行人工流产术的患者,随机均分为观察组和对照组。观察组患者在术后即给予患者去氧孕烯炔雌醇片口服,对照组患者采用常规的抗生素及益母草颗粒治疗,治疗后对两组患者的宫腔粘连发生情况及两组患者的阴道出血时间、月经复潮时间及阴道出血量进行比较分析。结果观察组患者官腔粘连发生率（4．0％）明显低于对照组（16．0％）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（X2=-4．0000,P=-O．0455）。观察组患者的阴道出血时间、月经复潮时间明显短于对照组,阴道出血量明显少于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈O．01）。结论去氧孕烯炔雌醇片在人工流产术后预防宫腔粘连的疗效显著,可降低宫腔粘连发生率,缩短阴道出血时间及月经复潮时间,减少阴道出血量。     

Bioavailability of two new formulations of paracetamol, compared with three marketed formulations, in healthy volunteers

The aim of this study was to compare the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of two new paracetamol formulations, powder sachet and tablet, with that of three commercially available paracetamol formulations: two conventional solid tablets and one effervescent tablet. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in an open, single dose (paracetamol 1,000 mg), randomized, five-way, crossover study. Formulations studied included: formulation A: 2 x 500 mg paracetamol tablets (Laboratorios Belmac S.A.); formulation B: 1 x 1,000 mg paracetamol powder sachets (Laboratorios Belmac, S.A.); formulation C: 2 x 500 mg paracetamol film-coated tablets (Panadol, SmithKline Beecham); formulation D: 2 x 500 mg paracetamol tablets (Tylenol, McNeil); and formulation E: 1 x 1,000 mg effervescent paracetamol tablets (Efferalgan, UPSA). The primary variables were area under the plasma concentration time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax). Mean AUC(0-infinity) ranged from 52.6 (B) to 56.3 microg x h/ml (D); mean Cmax varied between 17.98 (C) and 20.73 microg/ml (E); mean tmax ranged from 0.40 (E) to 0.88 h (C); and median t(1/2) varied between 2.65 (C) and 2.81 h (A). Formulations A, B and E showed significantly shorter tmax than formulation C. The tmax and Cmax values found for formulations A and B were very similar to that found for E, an effervescent tablet formulation. In conclusion, the two new formulations of paracetamol tested in this study were absorbed rapidly after a single oral dose in healthy volunteers, similar to an effervescent paracetamol formulation and significantly faster than two ordinary commercialized paracetamol tablets.     

Effect of multiple-dose dexloxiglumide on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives in healthy women

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of dexloxiglumide, a selective cholecystokinin receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (OC). A single-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy young female subjects who received Ortho Tri-Cyclen containing ethinyl estradiol (EE, 0.035 mg) and norgestimate (NE, 0.180 mg/0.215 mg/0.250 mg per 7-day phase, respectively) for 5 days (days 17-21) concurrently with either 200 mg dexloxiglumide (3 times a day on days 17-20, followed by a single dose on day 21) or matching placebo during 2 consecutive 28-day OC dosing cycles. Plasma was sampled up to 24 hours for the determination of EE, NE, and 17-deactyl norgestimate (17-DNE, a rapidly formed pharmacologically active metabolite of NE). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs, dexloxiglumide/placebo) of the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours with corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.21 (1.17-1.26) and 0.92 (0.89-0.95), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of C(max) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.15 (1.09-1.20) and 0.93 (0.90-0.96), respectively. Coadministration of OC and dexloxiglumide was well tolerated and safe. Comparable systemic exposure of EE and 17-DNE in the presence and absence of dexloxiglumide suggests that dexloxiglumide treatment is unlikely to interfere with the safety and efficacy of oral contraceptives based on the analysis of the resulting pharmacokinetic profile.     

Influence of taranabant, an orally active, highly selective, potent cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) inverse agonist, on ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin plasma pharmacokinetics

Taranabant, an orally active, potent, and highly selective CB-1 receptor inverse agonist, is being developed for the treatment of obesity. This randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, crossover study evaluated the effect of taranabant on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin in healthy women receiving > or =3 months of therapy with oral contraceptives. Nineteen participants with normal menstrual cycles received oral contraceptives on days 1 to 21 during 2 consecutive contraceptive cycles. Participants received taranabant 6 mg/day or placebo on days 1 to 21 of each contraceptive cycle. Plasma samples were collected predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose on day 21 of each cycle for determination of AUC0-24 h and Cmax of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin. Lack of a clinically important effect was declared if the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-24 h and Cmax in the absence and presence of taranabant were contained within the predefined bounds of (0.8, 1.25). The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin, respectively, were 0.93 (0.87, 1.00) and 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) for AUC0-24 h and 0.95 (0.88, 1.01) and 0.95 (0.88, 1.01) for Cmax. In summary, coadministration of multiple-dose taranabant 6 mg with oral contraceptives did not lead to clinically meaningful alterations in the pharmacokinetic profiles of ethinyl estradiol or norelgestromin.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a transdermal contraceptive patch and an oral contraceptive

This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a transdermal contraceptive patch and a norgestimate-containing oral contraceptive. Healthy women (n = 34) applied a patch once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks during each of 2 cycles and received an oral contraceptive for 21 consecutive days during each of 2 cycles. Plasma concentrations of norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol peaked and waned after daily oral contraceptive administration, whereas they rose and reached steady-state levels after first patch application. Norelgestromin exposure was similar; ethinyl estradiol exposure was higher for the patch than oral contraceptive. Hepatic estrogenic activity, assessed by hepatic globulin synthesis, was similar for corticosteroid-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin-binding capacity and higher for sex hormone-binding globulin for the patch versus oral contraceptive. The clinical significance of the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles between the patch and oral contraceptive is not fully known. No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events were recorded.     

Placebo-controlled comparative study of the anxiolytic activity and of the pharmacokinetics of oral and sublingual lorazepam in generalized anxiety

In a randomized crossover study, twelve patients presenting a generalized anxiety disorder received either a 1 mg oral tablet or a 1 mg sublingual tablet of lorazepam three times daily for 7 days. After a 7-day washout period, each patient received a 7-day treatment with the other tablet form. Treatments were administered in a double-blind manner using placebos of both the oral and sublingual tablets. Psychiatric evaluations were carried out before and following each of the three periods. Blood samples were drawn at intervals for 48 h following the last dose of each treatment. The plasma concentrations of lorazepam were measured by gas chromatography using an electron-capture detector. Both the oral and sublingual lorazepam produced a significant anxiolytic effect; there was no statistically significant difference between the therapeutic effectiveness of the two forms of lorazepam. The main pharmacokinetic parameters for the oral and sublingual tablets were, respectively: elimination half-life 15.6h and 11.7h; maximal concentration 40.8 ng ml-1 and 42.2 ng ml-1; time to reach maximal concentration 1.2h and 1.4h; corrected area under the curve 310.6 ng hml-1 and 313.6 ng hml-1. There was no statistically significant difference between the oral and sublingual tablets for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters measured.