Economic evaluation of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in the Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Objective: To asses the cost-effectiveness of voriconazole in comparison to conventional amphotericin B and itraconazole for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in the Netherlands.

Methods: The cost-effectiveness of voriconazole in comparison to conventional amphotericin B or itraconazole was evaluated with a decision tree model followed by a life-time Markov model, focusing on long-term survival of patients treated for invasive aspergillosis. Efficacy after 12 weeks of treatment from clinical trials was used to estimate long-term effectiveness by extrapolating these short-term results over time. Information on medical resource consumption, treatment pathways and switch proportions were obtained from both the literature and Experts. Probabilistic analysis was used to compare the cost-effectiveness among the regimens.

Results: With voriconazole, the mean cost for treating invasive aspergillosis per patient was €32?651 (2.5th percentile and 97.5th of uncertainty distribution: €30?037; €36?859), compared to €33?616 (€30?920; €39?633) for conventional amphotericin B and €29?115 (€23?537; €61?414) for itraconazole. The mean survival of patients treated with voriconazole was 174.0 life weeks (160.1; 188.8), compared to 116.1 life weeks (104.8; 128.0) for conventional amphotericin B and 150.4 life weeks (109.1; 194.4) for itraconazole. The beneficial effects of voriconazole on both cost and effectiveness compared with conventional amphotericin B resulted in a probability of 69.8% that voriconazole was a dominant treatment (i.e. less costs and longer survival). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of voriconazole versus itraconazole was €150 per life week (i.e. 7800 euros per life-year gained). Depending on the willingness to pay (WTP) the probability of being cost-effective vs. itraconazole increased to a maximum probability of 70%.

Conclusion: In the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, voriconazole is dominant over amphotericin B and cost-effective in comparison to itraconazole.     

symbol: see text]Caspofungin and [symbol: see text]voriconazole for fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections are difficult to treat and often fatal. Established treatment options include conventional amphotericin B or one of its lipid-based or liposomal formulations, or a triazole antifungal such as fluconazole or itraconazole. [symbol: see text]Caspofungin (Cancidas--Merck Sharp & Dohme) and [symbol: see text]voriconazole (Vfend--Pfizer) are two new antifungals for severe infections caused by Candida spp. (invasive candidiasis) and Aspergillus spp. (invasive aspergillosis). Caspofungin is the first licensed echinocandin antifungal, while voriconazole is a triazole. Promotional claims for caspofungin include that it "provides an effective, yet less toxic, alternative to amphotericin B" while voriconazole is claimed to offer "significantly improved survival in invasive aspergillosis compared with amphotericin B". Here we consider the place of caspofungin and voriconazole in managing patients with severe fungal infections.     

Comparative cost-effectiveness of voriconazole and amphotericin B in treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

PURPOSE: The comparative cost-effectiveness of voriconazole and amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was examined. METHODS: A decision-tree model was constructed comparing 12-week treatment outcomes in a subset of patients enrolled in a clinical trial comparing initial treatment of IPA with amphotericin B versus voriconazole. Patients included those with IPA who underwent a thoracic computed tomographic (CT) scan at baseline. Cost and survival were estimated for those with and without a halo sign at baseline. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing voriconazole with amphotericin B were calculated for both patient subgroups. RESULTS: Patients with a halo sign had similar costs and better survival rates than those without the sign. Within the subgroup of patients with the sign, total costs were lower and survival rates higher for those treated with voriconazole than for those treated with amphotericin B. For patients without a halo sign, total costs and survival rates were higher for those treated with voriconazole versus amphotericin B. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated for IPA, those with a baseline CT halo sign, an early indicator of the condition, appeared to have better survival rates and lower health care costs compared with patients without the sign. In patients with the halo sign, survival rates were higher and costs were lower when voriconazole rather than amphotericin B was used as first-line treatment; survival was better with voriconazole than with amphotericin B when the halo sign was not present. Voriconazole was cost-effective compared with amphotericin B when the halo sign was present, but voriconazole's cost-effectiveness when the sign was not present depended on the cost per life saved.     

Current strategies in the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infections in immunocompromised patients.

Aspergillus infections have a very high mortality rate. Their incidence is growing because of the increasing number of immunocompromised patients. Treatment of Aspergillus infection is difficult, and the agents used have numerous adverse effects and toxicities. Recently, new and less nephrotoxic formulations of amphotericin B have come onto the market and other new drugs, such as voriconazole and terbinafine, are under evaluation for this infection. Restoration of host immune defences by tapering of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant patients or correction of granulocytopenia in haematological disease is the cornerstone of modern treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. In patients with invasive aspergillosis it is very important to achieve therapeutic concentrations of antimycotic drugs as quickly as possible. Patients at high risk of developing aspergillosis (e.g. those with granulocytopenia) should be treated on the basis of clinical or radiological criteria alone if microbiological or histological diagnosis would significantly delay treatment. Conventional amphotericin B is still the first-line treatment for patients with invasive aspergillosis. In transplant patients receiving other nephrotoxic drugs, particularly cyclosporin, first-line therapy with one of the new amphotericin B formulations should be considered. If the emergence of renal toxicity in any patient precludes aggressive treatment, the patient should be switched to one of the new formulations of amphotericin B. For patients cured with amphotericin B, secondary prophylaxis is needed at the end of the intravenous therapy. Amphotericin B by aerosol or itraconazole are possible solutions. In non-invasive forms of aspergillosis, such as suppurative bronchitis, patients could be treated either with amphotericin B or itraconazole as first-line therapy.     

Invasive aspergillosis in pediatric patients

Abstract

This case-based review examines the growing literature on critical issues related to the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric invasive aspergillosis. Immunocompromised children are at heightened risk for invasive aspergillosis. Children at highest risk include those with new-onset or relapsed hematologic malignancy and recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants. Additional risk factors in stem cell transplant recipients include impaired lymphocyte engraftment and graft-versus-host disease. Pediatric invasive aspergillosis is associated with a high mortality rate (generally >50%) and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent dissemination and death. Tools available for diagnosis include radiologic examinations (primarily computed tomography), the galactomannan assay, bronchoalveolar lavage, and tissue biopsy. Age-related differences in computed tomography and galactomannan assay results have been suggested. Recommended primary therapy for pediatric invasive aspergillosis is voriconazole (7?mg/kg IV q12 hours). Currently approved alternative therapies include liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex, and caspofungin. Posaconazole and itraconazole are also possibilities, but there is no established pediatric dose for posaconazole, and itraconazole dosing is difficult in children. In patients who do not benefit from initial antifungal therapy, options include switching to another agent with a different mechanism of action or combination therapy. Further research is required to better establish optimal approaches to the management of pediatric patients with invasive aspergillosis recalcitrant to initial primary therapy.     

Caspofungin: new preparation. A last resort in invasive aspergillosis

(1) Invasive aspergillosis is rare. It usually occurs in immunocompromised patients and is fatal despite treatment in 40-90% of cases. The reference treatments are standard amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and itraconazole. (2) Caspofungin, an antifungal drug, is now approved in the Europe Union for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, when reference drugs fail or are poorly tolerated. (3) In a non comparative trial in 69 patients, intravenous caspofungin infusion was at least partly effective: 40% of patients survived with few relapses for at least one year following treatment. A historical comparison also favours caspofungin therapy. (4) The safety profile of caspofungin is poorly documented. It includes local reactions at the injection site, systemic reactions linked to the infusion (especially due to histamine release) and hepatic disorders. (5) Caspofungin is known to interact with tacrolimus (lower tacrolimus concentrations), ciclosporin (increased caspofungin bioavailability) and rifampicin (reduced caspofungin bioavailability). (6) In practice, caspofungin is an acceptable option for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis when standard amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and itraconazole are ineffective or poorly tolerated. Its clinical assessment is limited and must be continued.     

伏立康唑与伊曲康唑治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺曲霉菌感染的循证药物经济学评价

目的： 通过Meta分析评价伏立康唑与伊曲康唑治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺曲霉菌感染的安全性、有效性和经济性。方法： 计算机检索中国知网（CNKI）、万方数据库、维普数据库等中文数据库和PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane Library等英文数据库,检索伏立康唑与伊曲康唑治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺曲霉菌感染的临床对照试验,使用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析,采用成本-效果分析方法进行经济学评价,并进行单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析。结果： Meta分析结果显示,在疗效方面,伏立康唑优于伊曲康唑（OR=3.40,95%CI：2.22~5.21,P<0.01）,在安全性方面,2种方案无显著性差异（OR=0.86,95%CI：0.40~1.84,P=0.70）,均具有较好的安全性。药物经济学评价结果显示,相比于伊曲康唑,伏立康唑治疗的增量成本效果比（ICER）值为45 928.35元,敏感性分析结果与基本分析结果基本一致,说明基础分析结果较为稳定。结论： 伏立康唑治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺曲霉菌感染的疗效优于伊曲康唑,但伏立康唑治疗的ICER值过高,因此伊曲康唑治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺曲霉菌感染更具有经济性。     

Echinocandins: role in antifungal therapy, 2005

Novel therapies to treat invasive fungal infections have revolutionised the care of patients with candidiasis, aspergillosis and other less common fungal infections. Physicians in the twenty first century have access to safer versions of conventional drugs (i.e., lipid amphotericin B products), extended-spectrum versions of established drugs (i.e., voriconazole), as well as a new class of antifungal agents; the echinocandins. The increased number of options in the antifungal armamentarium is well timed, as the incidence of both invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis, and the financial burden associated with these infections, have increased significantly in the past several decades. The increasing incidence of fungal infections has risen in parallel with the increase in critically ill and immunocompromised patients. Candida is the fourth most common bloodstream isolate, approximately 50% of which are non-albicans species. Estimates suggest there to be 9.8 episodes of invasive candidiasis per 1000 admissions to surgical intensive care units, with attributable mortality at 30% and cost per episode of US44,000 dollars. The burden of candidiasis is even higher in the paediatric population, with Candida being the second most common bloodstream infection. The increase in non-albicans candidiasis mandates the introduction of new antifungal agents capable of treating these often azole-resistant isolates. In addition, there has been a rise in the incidence of invasive aspergillosis, the most common invasive mould infection following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with an estimated incidence of 10 - 20%. The mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis has increased by 357% since 1980. Unfortunately, the overall survival rate among patients treated with amphotericin B, and even voriconazole, remains suboptimal, as evidenced by the failure of treatment in 47% of patients in the landmark voriconazole versus amphotericin B trial. Given the increasing incidence and suboptimal outcomes of these serious fungal infections, novel therapies represent an opportunity for significant advancement in clinical care. The current challenge is to discover the optimal place for the echinocandins in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.     

Voriconazole: new preparation. Invasive aspergillosis: benefits to be confirmed

(1) Amphotericin B is the antifungal drug of choice for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, severe candidiasis and Fusarium infection. Voriconazole is an antifungal azole sold in France for oral and intravenous treatment of these infections. (2) In 391 patients with established or probable invasive aspergillosis, combined analysis of two trials comparing voriconazole (intravenously then orally) with conventional amphotericin (intravenously) showed that the 12-week survival rate was significantly higher with voriconazole (70.8% versus 57.9%). Unfortunately, these results are undermined by methodological flaws such as the lack of blinding, the very different intravenous treatment periods in the two groups, and subsequent oral treatment with different antifungal drugs. Voriconazole has not been compared with liposomal amphotericin B. (3) In the treatment of severe candidiasis, and severe Scedosporium and Fusarium infections, we only have the (favourable) results of non comparative trials in small numbers of patients refractory to other antifungal drugs. (4) The main adverse effects were visual disturbances, elevated hepatic enzyme levels, acute renal failure, and sometimes serious cutaneous reactions. It lengthens the QT interval and can cause torsades de pointes. It inhibits the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CY3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, hence a high risk of potentially serious drug interactions. (5) Voriconazole can be given by mouth or by IV infusion, whereas liposomal amphotericin B must be given intravenously. (6) In practice, another more rigorous trial is needed to confirm the favourable results obtained with voriconazole in invasive aspergillosis. Voriconazole is the first-line treatment for severe Scedosporium infections, despite limited experience. It is a last resort for severe candidiasis and severe Fusarium infection.     

Voriconazole: in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis

Voriconazole, a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent, inhibits the cytochrome P450-dependent enzyme 14-alpha-sterol demethylase, thereby disrupting the fungal membrane and stopping fungal growth. The drug shows excellent in vitro activity against Aspergillus spp., including itraconazole- and amphotericin B-resistant A. fumigatus isolates. At 12 weeks, 52.8% of voriconazole recipients achieved a successful outcome (complete or partial response) versus 31.6% of amphotericin B recipients in a randomised, nonblind trial in 392 patients (aged > or =12 years) with invasive aspergillosis. Patients received intravenous voriconazole (6 mg/kg once every 12 hours on day 1, then 4 mg/kg once every 12 hours for > or =7 days; patients could then be switched to oral voriconazole 200mg once every 12 hours) or intravenous amphotericin B (1 to 1.5 mg/kg/day for > or=14 days). At the investigators' discretion, those who failed to respond to or experienced toxicity with the initial randomised drug could be switched to other licensed antifungal therapy. Voriconazole was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events were transient visual disturbances (approximately 30% of patients) and skin rashes (6%). Voriconazole was generally better tolerated than amphotericin B; voriconazole recipients experienced significantly (p < 0.02 both comparisons) fewer treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events. The incidence of visual disturbances was significantly (p < 0.001) higher with voriconazole than amphotericin B treatment.     

Nebulization of four commercially available amphotericin B formulations in persistently granulocytopenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: evidence for long-term biological activity

The nebulization of amphotericin B desoxycholate (AMB-DOC), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) has been investigated. Particle sizes of generated aerosol droplets were measured. Pulmonary amphotericin B deposition and amphotericin B concentration in blood directly after nebulization and at six weeks after nebulization was measured in healthy rats. The efficacy of nebulized amphotericin B formulations was evaluated in persistently granulocytopenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Treatment was given either after or before fungal inoculation. The endpoint was survival of animals. Aerosol particle sizes, expressed as the values for the mass median diameter were 1.38, 2.43, 0.90 and 2.29 microm for AMB-DOC, L-AMB, ABLC and ABCD, respectively. Amphotericin B concentrations in the lungs directly after nebulization exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration of Aspergillus fumigatus and amphotericin B was still detected in lungs of rats at six weeks after nebulization. Treatment, started at 16 h after fungal inoculation, resulted in a significantly prolonged survival as compared with sham-treated rats for all four formulations. Prophylactic treatment at one week before fungal inoculation resulted in a significantly prolonged survival for all four formulations. Aerosol treatment given at two weeks before inoculation was effective only for AMB-DOC and L-AMB, whereas treatment given at six weeks resulted in a significantly prolonged survival for L-AMB only. All commercially available amphotericin B preparations could be nebulized efficiently and may be of value in the prophylactic treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.     

伏立康唑治疗侵袭性真菌感染有效性及安全性的Meta分析

目的系统评价伏立康唑治疗侵袭性真菌感染的有效性及安全性。方法检索PubMed、Co-chrane Library、EMbase、CNKI、CBM、VIP数据库,收集截至2011年12月已发表的伏立康唑治疗深部真菌感染的随机对照试验。由2名研究者按照纳入标准独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价质量后,采取RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入研究7项,676例。Meta分析结果提示,伏立康唑、两性霉素B的治疗成功率比较,差异无统计学意义;伏立康唑、伊曲康唑的治疗成功率、不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义;伏立康唑治疗成功率略高于米卡芬净组(P=0.11),但差异无统计学意义,其不良反应发生率高于米卡芬净(P=0.000 6)。结论伏立康唑在治疗侵袭性真菌感染中表现出高效低毒的特点。随着其临床应用愈加广泛,其价值有待进一步检验。     

Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients

Morbidity and mortality caused by invasive Aspergillus infections are increasing. This is because of the higher number of patients with malignancies treated with intensive immunosuppressive therapy regimens as well as their improved survival from formerly fatal bacterial infections, and the rising number of patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell or organ transplantation. Early initiation of effective systemic antifungal treatment is essential for a successful clinical outcome in these patients; however, clinical clues for diagnosis are sparse and early microbiological proof of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is rare. Clinical diagnosis is based on pulmonary CT scan findings and non-culture based diagnostic techniques such as galactomannan or DNA detection in blood or bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Most promising outcomes can be expected in patients at high risk for aspergillosis in whom antifungal treatment has been started pre-emptively, backed up by laboratory and imaging findings. The gold standard of systemic antifungal treatment is voriconazole, which has been proven to be significantly superior to conventional amphotericin B and has led to a profound improvement of survival rates in patients with cerebral aspergillosis. Liposomal amphotericin B at standard dosages appears to be a suitable alternative for primary treatment, while caspofungin, amphotericin B lipid complex or posaconazole have shown partial or complete response in patients who had been refractory to or intolerant of primary antifungal therapy. Combination therapy with two antifungal compounds may be a promising future strategy for first-line treatment. Lung resection helps to prevent fatal haemorrhage in single patients with pulmonary lesions located in close proximity to larger blood vessels, but is primarily considered for reducing the risk of relapse during subsequent periods of severe immunosuppression. Strict reverse isolation appears to reduce the incidence of aspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing aggressive anticancer therapy. Well designed, prospective randomised studies on infection control measures effective to prevent aspergillosis are lacking. Prophylactic systemic antifungal treatment with posaconazole significantly improves survival and reduces IA in acute myeloid leukaemia patients and reduces aspergillosis incidence rates in patients with intermediate-to-severe graft-versus-host reaction emerging after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Voriconazole prophylaxis may be suitable for prevention of IA as well; however, the results of large clinical trials are still awaited.     

Aspergillus susceptibility testing in patients with cancer and invasive aspergillosis: difficulties in establishing correlation between in vitro susceptibility data and the outcome of initial amphotericin B therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES: As the failure of amphotericin B therapy in patients with invasive aspergillosis often exceeds 50%, we sought to determine the relationship between in vitro amphotericin B resistance and clinical failure of amphotericin B against invasive aspergillosis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University cancer center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixteen patients with cancer and invasive aspergillosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The correlation between in vitro amphotericin B susceptibility, defined by both the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and Etest methods, and other prognostic factors with failure of initial amphotericin B therapy was retrospectively evaluated. Data for correlation could be clearly assessed in only 18 (16%) of the 116 patients. Admission to the intensive care unit was the only prognostic factor associated with failure of initial amphotericin B treatment in these 18 patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Several important obstacles underlie the correlation of in vitro susceptibility testing with in vivo efficacy of individual antifungal agents in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Such correlations could be determined in only a small subset of patients.     

Current antifungal treatment of fusariosis

Fungi of the genus Fusarium are well known as major plant pathogens and soil inhabitants, but also cause a broad spectrum of human infections. Fusariosis is the second most common mould infection after aspergillosis, and keratitis is the most encountered implantation infection in immunocompetent individuals. Natamycin is active against Fusarium species both in vitro and in vivo, and is used along with voriconazole as the mainstay of treatment for Fusarium keratitis. Onychomycosis is treated with terbinafine, voriconazole and sometimes itraconazole. Cure is possible despite high in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Recently, disseminated infections have increased dramatically, mainly affecting severely immunocompromised patients. The remarkable intrinsic resistance of Fusarium species to most antifungal agents results in high mortality rates in this patient population. Recovery of neutropenia is essential for patient survival and treatment should include voriconazole or amphotericin B as first–line and posaconazole as salvage therapy.     

Systemic antifungal therapy: new options, new challenges

The frequency of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically in recent decades because of an expanding population at risk. Until now, treatment options for invasive mycoses have been primarily amphotericin B and the azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole. Traditional agents are limited by an inadequate spectrum of activity, drug resistance, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The recent approval of caspofungin and voriconazole clearly has expanded the number of existing antifungal drugs available. However, the enthusiasm that accompanies their availability is counterbalanced by limited clinical experience, high drug acquisition costs, and distinctive toxicities. The pharmacologic characteristics, extent of clinical experience (efficacy and toxicity), and drug acquisition costs among available systemic antifungal agents are compared, with emphasis on the new agents. Also, recommendations on the role of each agent are provided according to the most common indications for systemic antifungal therapy: invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and febrile neutropenia.     

In vitro susceptibility testing of Candida and Aspergillus spp. to voriconazole and other antifungal agents using Etest: results of a French multicentre study

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antifungal agent voriconazole were determined using the Etest and compared with those of amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole using 1986 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Voriconazole MICs were also compared with those of amphotericin B and itraconazole using 391 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Voriconazole was found to have more potent activity and lower MIC values than amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole against C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis and C. kefyr. Against C. glabrata and C. krusei, voriconazole was more active than either of the other two azole antifungals but had similar activity to amphotericin B. For species of Aspergillus, MIC values of voriconazole were lower than those of amphotericin B and itraconazole against A. fumigatus and A. flavus, and were similar to those of amphotericin B against A. niger. Against A. terreus, MIC values for voriconazole and itraconazole were similar. A. terreus is known to be resistant to amphotericin B, and this was reflected in higher MIC values compared with those of voriconazole and itraconazole. Voriconazole therefore compares very favourably with other antifungal agents against a large number of clinical isolates of Candida and Aspergillus spp.     

孕产妇感染侵袭性肺曲霉病1例并文献复习

目的 提高对孕产妇罹患侵袭性肺曲霉病的认识.方法 结合1例侵袭性肺曲霉病孕产妇患者的临床资料及诊治经过并复习相关文献,对侵袭性肺曲霉病的临床表现、影像学特点、诊断要点及治疗进行分析.结果 患者女,27岁,孕产妇,因咳嗽、咳痰、呼吸困难伴发热半个月于2011年4月18日入我院呼吸内科.患者半个月前(临产前1 d)突发咳嗽、咳痰、呼吸困难伴高热,在当地医院住院给予多种抗生素治疗,但病情无好转且喘息加重而紧急转入我院.入院后病情危重,影像显示双肺多发性侵袭性空洞,5次痰分离出烟曲霉菌,纤支镜刷检物培养出烟曲霉菌.在积极支持治疗和对症处理的基础上,先后给予伏立康唑、伊曲康唑、两性霉素B、卡泊芬净治疗4个月,复查双肺CT影像明显吸收、空洞愈合,患者康复出院.结论 随着人口老龄化及免疫抑制剂的广泛应用,侵袭性肺曲霉病目前已不少见,相关报道亦较多,但孕产妇感染本病、病情进展凶险且被成功救治的病例目前尚未见报道,此报道一例.     

Voriconazole treatment of invasive aspergillosis: real-world versus health-economic model results

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess, in a real-world setting, the predictive validity (in terms of clinical outcome and treatment cost) of the voriconazole arm of a health-economic model applied in the Belgian reimbursement submission for use of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: A non-interventional study was designed to prospectively collect clinical response and direct costs data related to the treatment of invasive aspergillosis with voriconazole (oral, intravenous) in real-world practice. The outcomes of this study were compared with the inputs and outputs of the health-economic model. For the analysis, unit costs of 2002 from the public payer's perspective, as used in the model, were applied. RESULTS: Data from 116 patients with invasive aspergillosis starting treatment with voriconazole were collected. At 12 weeks, there were similar rates of satisfactory clinical response for the observational study and the model, the latter based on the results of a clinical study (50% vs 53%, respectively). Overall mortality rates at 84 days were 42% in the observational study and 29% in the model. Average total healthcare cost associated with voriconazole treatment was lower in the observational study compared with the model for all patients. When the cost for all hospitalization days from the start until the end of the fungal infection was included in the analysis, the average total cost was euro19,674. When the cost for only those hospitalization days solely related to the fungal infection was included in the analysis, the average total cost was euro12,376. These costs are below the cost predicted by the model of euro21,298. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that the results provided in the voriconazole arm of the health-economic model were valid estimates with regard to real-world outcomes but with a slightly better survival rate and higher costs than in real life.     

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment of unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.