Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: A study of 281 Western patients

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare survival between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2013 we consecutively and retrospectively included all patients with first occurrence of HCC within Milan criteria receiving SR or RFA as first-line treatment. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared after inverse probability weighting (including confounding factor). Results: A total of 281 patients (RFA 178, SR 103) were enrolled. In multivariate Cox regression RFA and SR were not independent predictors of survival or recurrence. The respective weighted 5 years OS and DFS for patients with propensity scores between 0.1–0.9 in the SR and RFA groups were 54–33% and 60–16.9%, P?=?0.695 and P?=?0.426, respectively. Local tumour progression rate did not differ according to treatment (P?=?0.523). Major complication rate was higher in the SR group, P?=?0.001. Hospitalisation duration was lower in the RFA group (mean 2.19 days, range 2–7) than in the SR group (mean 10.2 days, range 3–30), P?<?0.001. Conclusion: This large Western study has shown that OS and DFS did not differ after RFA (using mainly multipolar devices) and SR, for HCC within the Milan criteria in a European population, with a shorter hospitalisation time and a lower complication rate for RFA.     

Needle track seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: 14-year experience at a single centre

Purpose: To determine the incidence, risk factors and prognosis associated with needle track seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablations (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a long-term follow-up.

Materials and methods: A total of 741 HCC patients undergoing percutaneous RFA were retrospectively analysed. Mean follow-up interval was 34.3?±?26.8 months. All seeding neoplasms were diagnosed by imaging modalities with or without pathological evaluation. Risk factors, including Child–Pugh grading, tumour size, number, location, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, track number, biopsy before RFA and electrode type were performed by univariate analysis. Further therapy and survival of seeding after RFA were assessed. Survival analysis was analysed by Kaplan–Meier method.

Results: Twelve patients (12 tumours) were diagnosed as seeding. It corresponds to an incidence of 1.6% (12/741) per patient and 0.9% (12/1341) per tumour. Seeding developed an average of 14.0?±?8.1 months (6–33 months). Significant risk factors included tumour >3?cm (p?=?0.031), subcapsular tumour (p?=?0.031), biopsy before RFA (p?=?0.001) and non-cool-tip electrode (p?=?0.034). Eight patients received local therapy and four cases only received systematic therapy for uncontrolled advanced hepatic tumour or distal metastasis. Of eight patients receiving local therapy, one patient had local recurrence 16 months later and other seven patients did not have local recurrence for 3–73 months. The cumulative survival rates after seeding were 55.6%, 27.8%, 9.3% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively.

Conclusion: Needle track seeding is a rare delayed complication after percutaneous RFA. Tumour >3?cm, subcapsular tumour, biopsy before RFA and non-cool-tip electrode are potential risk factors for seeding. Local therapies are effective methods for seeding patients.     

Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for patients with extrahepatic oligometastases of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic outcome of percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for extrahepatic oligometastases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study, and all patients provided written informed consent. Between April 2004 and December 2015, 116 oligometastases (diameter, 5–50?mm; 20.3?±?10.4) in 79 consecutive HCC patients (73 men and 6 women; average age, 50.3?years ±13.0) were treated with RFA. We focussed on patients with 1–3 extrahepatic metastases (EHM) confined to 1–2 organs (including the lung, adrenal gland, bone, lymph node and pleura/peritoneum) who were treated naïve with curative intent. Survival, technical success and safety were evaluated. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyse the survival data.

Results: No immediate technical failure occurred, and at 1 month, the technique effectiveness rate was determined to be 95.8%. After a median follow-up time of 28.0 months (range, 6–108 months), the 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 91, 70 and 48%, respectively, with a median survival time of 33.5 months. Time to unoligometastatic progression (TTUP) of less than 6 months (p?p?=?0.001) were significant indicators of shorter OS. The 1-, 2- and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 34, 21 and 8%, respectively, with a median DFS time of 6.8 months. DFS was better for those with lung metastases (p?=?0.006). Major complication occurred in nine (9.5%, 9/95) RFA sessions without treatment-related mortality.

Conclusions: CT-guided RFA for oligometastatic HCC may provide favourable efficacy and technical success with a minimally invasive approach.     

Association of primary tumor location with long-term oncological prognosis following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

PurposeThere is a striking laterality in the site of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a strong predominance for the right side; however, the impact of primary tumor location on long-term prognosis after hepatectomy of HCC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of primary tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis after hepatectomy for HCC.Patients and methodsData of consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatectomy for HCC between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of left-sided HCC (LS group) and right-sided HCC (RS group) were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. COX regression analysis was performed to assess the adjusted effect of tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis.ResultsOf the 2799 included patients, 707 (25.3%) and 2092 (74.7%) were in the LS and RS groups, respectively. Using PSM analysis, 650 matched pairs of patients were created. In the PSM cohort, median OS (66.0 vs. 72.0 months, P = 0.001) and RFS (28.0 vs. 51.0 months, P < 0.001) were worse among patients in the LS group compared to individuals in the RS group. After further adjustment for other confounders using multivariable COX regression analyses, HCC located on the left side remained independently associated with worse OS and RFS.ConclusionTumors located on the left side are associated with poorer OS and RFS after hepatectomy for HCC. Careful surgical options selection and frequent follow-up to improve long-term survival may be justified for HCC patients with left-sided primary tumors.     

Minimally invasive surgery versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a high-volume liver surgery center in East Asia

Background & aimsThe outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs. percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain inconclusive. This study thus aimed to compare the outcomes of both treatments for early-stage HCCs.MethodsThis retrospective study consecutively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed early-stage HCCs treated with MIS or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2018. Outcomes were compared between the MIS and RFA groups both before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsA total of 119 and 481 patients underwent MIS and percutaneous RFA, respectively. Patients undergoing percutaneous RFA exhibited older age (p = 0.007) and higher rates of Child–Pugh class B (p < 0.001) and multifocal disease (p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was 73.7 months in the MIS group, which was significantly higher than that for the RFA group of 65.1 months (p = 0.003). 50% HCC recurrence after MIS was not reached. The mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 49.6 months for the MIS group, which was significantly higher than the RFA group of 41.3 months (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥65 (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13–2.31, p = 0.009), RFA (HR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.14–4.29, p = 0.019), and Child–Pugh class B (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.29–3.21, p = 0.002) remained risk factors for OS, and RFA (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.42–3.35; p < 0.001) remained a risk factor for RFS. After PSM, 103 patients were included in each group. No significant difference in OS was identified (p = 0.198), but RFS was higher in the MIS group than the RFA group (p = 0.003). Severe postoperative complications occurred at the same rate (1%) in both groups (p > 0.99).ConclusionAfter PSM, severe postoperative complication and OS rates were found to be comparable between the MIS and RFA groups, but RFS was higher in the MIS group than the RFA group, suggesting that MIS may have better outcomes for patients with early-stage HCC.     

Comparison of efficacy and complications between radiofrequency ablation and repeat surgery in the treatment of locally recurrent thyroid cancers: a single-center propensity score matching study

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and complication rates of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and repeat surgery in the treatment of locally recurrent thyroid cancers.

Materials and methods: A total of 221 patients with locally recurrent thyroid cancers who underwent either RFA (n?=?96) or repeat surgery (n?=?125) between March 2008 and March 2017 were retrospectively enrolled (range of follow-up, 1–10?years). Each cohort consisted of 70 patients after propensity score adjustment. Patients with more than three recurrent lesions were excluded. The primary and secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and complication rates, respectively. Recurrence-free survival curves were compared via the log-rank test. The complications—voice changes, hypocalcemia, and immediate procedural complications—were compared between the groups. In addition, pretreatment serum thyroglobulin (T_g) levels and those at the last follow-up were also compared between the two groups to examine therapeutic efficacy.

Results: After propensity score matching, both groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the RFA and surgery groups (p?=?.2). There were no significant differences in mean serum T_g levels and their mean decrease after treatment between the groups (p?=?.891 and p?=?.963, respectively). Immediate procedural complications and voice changes also showed no significant between-group differences (p?=?.316, p?=?.084, respectively). Hypocalcemia occurred only in the repeat surgery group (n?=?18). Overall complications were significantly more frequent in the repeat surgery group (RFA, n?=?7; surgery, n?=?27; p?<?.001).

Conclusion: RFA may be an effective and safe alternative to repeat surgery in the treatment of a small number of locally recurrent thyroid cancers.     

Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma approached by curative-intent treatment: A propensity score analysis comparing radiofrequency ablation and liver resection

IntroductionPatients with a single small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) may be definitively treated by Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a very low rate of peri-operative morbidity. However, results are still controversial comparing RFA to Liver Resection (LR).MethodsAll consecutive patients treated by RFA or LR for a single untreated small HCC on liver cirrhosis between January 2006-December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were matched 1:1 basing on: age, MELD-score, platelet count, nodule's diameter, HCV status, α-fetoprotein level, and Albumin-Bilirubin score. First analysis compered LR to RFA. Second analysis compared Laparoscopic LR (LLR) to RFA.ResultsOf 484 patients with single small HCC, 91 patients were selected for each group after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PS-M). The 5-years OS was 70% and 60% respectively for LR and RFA group (P = 0.666). The 5-year RFS was 36% and 21% respectively for LR and RFA group (P < 0.001). Patients treated by LR had a significantly longer hospital stay and higher complications rate. Comparing 50 cases of LLR and 50 of RFA, the 5-years OS was 79% and 56% respectively for LLR and RFA group (P = 0.22). The 5-year RFS was 54% and 19% respectively for LR and RFA group (P < 0.001). Post-operative complications were not significantly different.ConclusionsLLR confers similar peri-operative complications rate compared to RFA. LLR should be considered as a first-line approach for the treatment of a single small HCC as it combines the effectiveness of open LR and the safety profile of RFA.     

Resection of liver metastases from breast cancer: a multicentre analysis

Background

Surgery is becoming more practical and effective than conservative treatment in improving the poor outcomes of patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). However, there is no generally acknowledged set of standards for identifying BCLM candidates who will benefit from surgery.

Methods

Between January 2011 and September 2018, 67 female BCLM patients who underwent partial hepatectomy were selected for analysis in the present study. Prognostic factors after hepatectomy were determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IHRFS).

Results

The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS of patients treated with surgery was 93.5%, 73.7% and 32.2%, respectively, with a median survival time of 57.59 months. The Pringle manoeuvre [hazard radio (HR)?=?0.117, 95% CI0.015–0.942, p?=?0.044] and an increased interval between breast surgery and BCLM diagnosis (HR0.178, 95% CI 0.037–0.869, p?=?0.033) independently predicted improved overall survival for BCLM patients. The 1-, 2- and 3-year IHRFS of patients who underwent surgery was 62.8, 32.6% and 10.9%, respectively, with a median intrahepatic recurrence-free survival time of 13.47 months. Moderately differentiated tumours (HR ?0.259, 95% CI 0.078–0.857, p?=?0.027) and the development of liver metastasis more than 2 years after breast surgery (HR ?0.270, 95% CI 0.108–0.675, p?=?0.005) might be predictors of increased IHRFS.

Conclusions

An interval of more than 2 years between breast cancer surgery and liver metastasis seems to be an indication of liver surgery in BCLM patients. The Pringle manoeuvre and moderately differentiated tumours are potential predictors associated with OS and IHRFS, respectively, as benefits from liver resection. Studies with increased sample sizes are warranted to validate our results.

     

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus surgical resection for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: intermediate-term results

Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) and surgical resection (SR) in patients with recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and to identify the prognostic factors associated with the two treatment methods.

Methods: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved. A total of 121 patients (102 men and 19 women) with 136 ICCs after hepatectomy from April 2011 to January 2017 were reviewed. Fifty-six patients underwent US-PMWA and 65 patients underwent SR. Survival, recurrence and liver function were compared between the two groups. Effect of changes in key parameters [i.e., overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)] was statistically analyzed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on clinicopathological variables to identify factors affecting long-term outcome.

Results: The OS and RFS after MWA were comparable to that of SR (p?=?.405, and p?=?.589, respectively). Estimated 5-year OS rates were 23.7% after MWA and 21.8% after SR; for RFS, estimated 3-year RFS rates were 33.1% after MWA and 30.6% after SR. Major complication rates in SR group were higher than that in MWA (p?<?.001) (SR, 13.8% vs. MWA, 5.3%). Multivariate analysis showed tumor number (p?=?.012), ALBI grade (p?=?.007), and metastasis (p?=?.016), may become OS rate predictors.

Conclusions: US-PMWA had comparable oncologic outcomes with SR and could be a safe and effective treatment for recurrent ICC after hepatectomy.     

Prognostic value of tumor deposits in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with propensity score matching

Background

The actual risks posed by tumor deposits (TDs) in colorectal cancer are still incompletely assessed. We explored the prognostic value of TDs in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients using propensity score matching (PSM) method.

Methods

Consecutive LARC patients in Peking University First Hospital between 2011 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were conducted to explore prognostic values of TDs. PSM method was conducted to minimize selection bias. The correlation between TDs number and prognosis was explored.

Results

Four hundred and fifty-one LARC patients were recruited, and 78 (17.3%) patients were with TDs. Multivariate Cox analysis identified that the presence of TDs was an independent prognostic risk factor for overall survival (OS) (P?=?0.044). PSM identified 76 matched pairs of LARC patients, and Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that patients with TDs experienced worse  OS (log-rank P?=?0.0220) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (log-rank P?=?0.0117). Subgroup analysis of 50 pairs extracted by PSM from 246 LARC patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) further proved that TDs were significantly associated with worse OS (log-rank P?=?0.0415), and the association was barely significant for RFS (log-rank P?=?0.0527). There were non-significant tendencies towards higher mortality in TDs?≥?2 than TD?=?1 group (log-rank P?=?0.348 for OS, log-rank P?=?0.087 for RFS).

Conclusion

Our study manifested that the presence of TDs was an independent risk factor for LARC patients. The prognostic value of TDs for LARC patients with LNM should not be ignored.

     

Clinical efficacy and predictors of outcomes of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma – A systematic review

BackgroundPrimary hepatectomy is an accepted treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with good long-term survival, but high rates of recurrence. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC after initial hepatectomy.MethodsElectronic searches identified 22 eligible studies comprising of 1125 patients for systematic review. Studies with >10 patients, adopting repeat hepatectomy treatment for recurrent HCC initially treated with hepatectomy were selected for inclusion. A predetermined set of data comprising demographic details, morbidity and mortality indices and survival outcomes were collected for every study and tabulated.ResultsMajority of patients selected for repeat hepatectomy had Child-Pugh A (median 94%, range 40–100). Intrahepatic recurrence occurred at a median of 22.4 (range 12–48) months in this patient cohort with single nodule recurrences comprising of 70% of cases. The median mortality rate was 0% (range 0–6%). Prolonged ascites was observed in a median of 4% (range 0–32%), bleeding in 1% (range 0–9%), bile leak in 1% (range 0–6%) and liver failure in 1% (range 0–2%). The median disease-free survival was 15 (range 7–32) months and median overall survival was 52 (range 22–66) months. Median 3-year and 5-year survival was 69% (range 41–88%) and 52% (range 22–83%) respectively. Recurrences occurring 12–18 months after initial hepatectomy was consistently associated with improved survival.ConclusionSynthesized data from observational studies of repeat hepatectomy suggests that this treatment approach for recurrent HCC is safe and achieves long-term survival. Standardization of criteria for repeat hepatectomy and a randomized trial are warranted.     

Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging

Purpose: To analyse the precise ablative margin (AM) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the correlation between AM and local tumour progression (LTP) with a three-dimension (3D) reconstruction technique.

Methods: From March 2011 to May 2013, 134 patients who underwent RFA for 159 primary or recurrent HCCs within Milan criteria were enrolled. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were performed 1?week before and 1?month after treatment. The AM was measured in various directions using a 3D reconstruction technique that shows the index tumour and ablated zone on the same image. The average of all obtained AMs (average AM) and the smallest AM (min-AM) were calculated.

Results: The min-AM after RFA ranged from 1 to 9.3?mm (median?±?standard deviation, 4.8?±?1.8?mm). LTP was observed in 19 tumours from 19 patients. The median min-AM was 3.1?±?1.6?mm for patients with LTP, while the median min-AM of patients without LTP was 5.1?±?1.8?mm (p?=?0.023). After RFA, the 1-, 2- and 3-year LTP rates were 10.9, 25.9 and 35.1%, respectively, for patients with min-AM <5?mm, and 4.1, 4.1 and 4.1%, respectively, for patients with min-AM ≥5?mm (p?=?0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that only min-AM <5?mm was an independent risk factor for LTP after RFA (p?=?0.044, hazard ratio =4.587, 95% confidence interval, 1.045–22.296).

Conclusions: The 3D reconstruction technique is a precise method for evaluating the post-ablation margin. Patients with min-AM less than 5?mm had a higher probability of developing LTP.     

Prognostic significance of systemic immune-inflammation index-based nomogram for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation

BackgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended treatment for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in early stage HCC is not discussed. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to explore the prognostic value of SII based on lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts in patients with HCC after RFA.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the prognostic value of the SII in training and validation cohorts, and then established an effective nomogram for HCC after RFA based on SII. The C-index, and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (t-AUC) were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration value of the nomogram.ResultsAn optimal cut-off value for the SII of 324.55×10⁹ stratified the patients with HCC into high- and low-SII groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that SII was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Moreover, SII was an independent prognostic factor for early-stage HCC with normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. The t-AUC of the SII was higher for OS and RFS than for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). A high preoperative SII was associated with multiple tumors, larger tumors, and higher levels of AFP. A well-discriminated and calibrated nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFS with C-indexes of 0.80, which was significantly higher than that obtained with other prognostic clinical indexes.ConclusionsThe SII is an independent prognostic factor affecting the survival outcomes of patients with early-stage HCC. The comprehensive nomogram based on SII presented in this study is a promising model for predicting RFS in HCC patients after RFA.     

Safety of radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers.

Materials and methods: Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Library of Cochrane databases were searched up to 12 July 2016 for studies on the safety of RFA for treating benign thyroid nodules or recurrent thyroid cancers. Pooled proportions of overall and major complications were assessed using random-effects modelling. Heterogeneity among studies was determined using the χ² statistic for the pooled estimates and the inconsistency index I².

Results: A total of 24 eligible studies were included, giving a sample size of 2421 patients and 2786 thyroid nodules. 41 major complications and 48 minor complications of RFA were reported, giving a pooled proportion of 2.38% for overall RFA complications [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42%–3.34%] and 1.35% for major RFA complications (95% CI: 0.89%–1.81%). There were no heterogeneities in either overall or major complications (I²?=?1.24%–21.79%). On subgroup analysis, the overall and major complication rates were significantly higher for malignant thyroid nodules than for benign thyroid nodules (p?=?0.0011 and 0.0038, respectively).

Conclusions: RFA was found to be safe for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers.     

Combining transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with that of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All possible trials comparing RFA plus TACE with RFA alone for HCC were included into this meta-analysis. We estimated the summary odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) to assess the effects. Nineteen eligible studies matched the selection criteria, including 1,728 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of TACE and RFA (OR_1 year?=?2.14, 95 % CI?=?1.57–2.91, P?<?0.001; OR_3 years?=?1.98, 95 % CI?=?1.28–3.07, P?=?0.001; OR_5 years?=?2.70, 95 % CI?=?1.42–5.14, P?=?0.003) were associated with higher survival rates. No evidence of publication bias was observed. High-quality evidence suggests that TACE plus RFA improve the survival rates compared with RFA alone for patients with HCC.     

Population-based matching comparison between radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundLoco-regional therapies are evolving for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has changed the landscape in treating HCC; however, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection (PEI/PAI) remains a widely used and easily performed technique by experienced clinicians. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of RFA compared to that of PEI/PAI remains unclear.MethodsRecords of 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed HCC between 2007 and 2013 were drawn from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The primary outcome measures were the overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the effectiveness of RFA and PEI. Median follow-up time was 61.6 months (36–120 months).ResultsAfter PSM, 4496 patients diagnosed with stage I-III HCC, who were initially treated with RFA (3372 patients) or PEI/PAI (1124 patients), were assessed. Compared to PEI/PAI, patients treated with RFA had better 5- and 9-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients treated with RFA vs PEI/PAI were 61.5 vs 41.9 months and 72.1 vs 45.2 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox model analysis revealed that, except for patients with high cell grade or advanced stage, RFA resulted in better overall survival (HR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.68–0.81, P < 0.001) and local recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.63–0.75, P < 0.001) than PEI/PAI.ConclusionsRFA provides advantages over conventional PEI/PAI for HCC. Considering technological advances in instruments, loco-regional therapies for HCC can be employed in carefully selected patients.     

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation vs. surgical resection for thoracoabdominal wall implants from hepatocellular carcinoma: intermediate-term results

Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and surgical resection (SR) in patients with thoracoabdominal wall implants from hepatocellular carcinom (HCC) and to identify the prognostic factors associated with the two treatment methods.

Materials and methods: A total of 47 patients (mean age, 56.7?±?15.9 years, range, 18–78 years; 34 men and 13 women) with 61 thoracoabdominal wall HCC seeding were included from April 2007 to May 2017. Twenty-five patients underwent US-guided MWA and 22 patients underwent SR. Survival, recurrence and liver function were compared between the two groups. Effect of changes in key parameters (i.e. overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local tumour reoccurrence-free (LTRF)) was statistically analysed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on several clinicopathological variables to identify factors affecting long-term outcome and recurrence.

Results: The OS, DFS and LTRF after MWA were comparable to those of SR (p?=0.493, p?=?0.578 and p?=0.270, respectively). Estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 63% after MWA and 48.1% after SR; for disease-free survival, estimated 5-year rates were 67.5% after MWA and 48.8% after SR; estimated 24-month LTRF rates were 71.3% after MWA and 87.8% after SR. The MWA group had less surgical time (p?=?<0.001), estimated blood loss (p =?<0.001) and post-operative hospitalisation (p?=?0.032) and cost (p?=?0.015). Multivariate analysis showed remnant intrahepatic tumour (p?=0.007), Child Pugh grade (p?=?0.009) and metastasis (p=?<0.001), were predictors for survival rate.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA is a safe and effective treatment method for metastatic HCC on the thoracoabdominal wall with similar outcomes to SR. Residual intrahepatic HCC, Child Pugh grade and distant metastasis are predictors for survival.     

Recurrence‐free and overall survival among elderly stage III colon cancer patients treated with CAPOX or capecitabine monotherapy

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of CAPOX and capecitabine on recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among elderly stage III colon cancer patients and to evaluate the effect of (non‐)completion. Patients aged ≥70 years who underwent resection only or who were subsequently treated with CAPOX or capecitabine in 10 large non‐academic hospitals were included. RFS and OS were analyzed with Kaplan‐Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics. 982 patients were included: 630 underwent surgery only, 191 received CAPOX and 161 received capecitabine. Five‐year RFS and OS did not differ between capecitabine and CAPOX (RFS: 63% vs. 60% (p = 0.91), adjusted HR = 0.99 (95%CI 0.68‐1.44); OS: 66% vs. 66% (p = 0.76), adjusted HR = 0.93 (95%CI 0.64–1.34)). After resection only, RFS was 38% and OS 37%. Completion rates were 48% for CAPOX and 68% for capecitabine. Three‐year RFS and OS did not differ between patients who discontinued CAPOX early and patients who completed treatment with CAPOX (RFS: 61% vs. 69% (p = 0.21), adjusted HR = 1.42 (95%CI 0.85–2.37); OS: 68% vs. 78% (p = 0.41), adjusted HR = 1.17 (95%CI 0.70–1.97)). Three‐year RFS and OS differed between patients who discontinued capecitabine early and patients who completed treatment with capecitabine (RFS: 54% vs. 72% (p = 0.01), adjusted HR = 2.07 (95%CI 1.11–3.84); OS: 65% vs. 80% (p = 0.01), adjusted HR = 2.00 (95%CI 1.12–3.59)). Receipt of CAPOX or capecitabine is associated with improved RFS and OS. The advantage does not differ by regimen. The addition of oxaliplatin might not be justified in elderly stage III colon cancer patients.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma abutting large vessels: comparison of four percutaneous ablation systems

Purpose: To compare overall local tumour progression (OLTP), defined as the failure of primary ablation or local tumour progression, with single applicator monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cluster-RFA and multi-bipolar radiofrequency (mbpRFA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?≤?5?cm abutting large vessels (≥3?mm).

Materials and methods: This multicenter, retrospective, per-nodule study was performed from 2007 to 2015. The study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was waived. A total of 160/914 HCC nodules treated by thermal ablation and abutting large vessels (40 per treatment group) treated by monopolar RFA, MWA, cluster-RFA or mbpRFA were matched for tumour size, alpha-feto-protein level and vessel size. OLTP rates were compared by the log-rank test and the multivariate Cox model after matching.

Results: No differences were observed in tumour size, vessel size or alpha-feto-protein levels among the three groups (p?=?1). The cumulative 4-year OLTP rates following monopolar RFA, cluster-RFA, multi-bipolar RFA and MWA were 50.5%, 16.3%, 16.3% and 44.2%, respectively (p?=?0.036). On multivariate Cox regression, vessel size ≥10?mm, monopolar RFA and MWA were independent risk factors of OLTP compared to cluster-RFA or mbpRFA.

Conclusion: Multi-applicator RFA provides better local tumour control in HCC abutting large vessels than single-applicator techniques (monopolar RFA or MWA).     

Prognostic value and association of sarcopenic obesity and systemic inflammatory indexes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy and the establishment of novel predictive nomograms

BackgroundThe specific impacts of sarcopenic obesity (SO) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the association between SO and systemic inflammation remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value and association of SO and systemic inflammation with outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC and develop novel nomograms based on SO and inflammatory indexes for survival prediction.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 452 patients with HCC who underwent radical hepatectomy between January 2012 and March 2015 in Fujian Provincial Hospital as the training cohort. In addition, 275 patients during the same period were enrolled as the external validation cohort. Patients were classified into different groups according to the presence of sarcopenia and obesity. Different inflammation indexes were evaluated to select the best predictor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to investigate the associations between inflammatory indexes and SO. The inflammatory indexes with the highest predictive values and SO were selected for subgroup analyses to establish a novel classification system: the SOLMR grade. SOLMR grades identified in the multivariate Cox analysis were selected to construct novel nomograms for OS and RFS.ResultsSO (P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. The lymphocyte‐monocyte ratio (LMR) had the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) for OS (P<0.001) and RFS (P<0.001) and was identified as an independent factor of SO (P=0.001). SO and the LMR were selected to establish the SOLMR grade. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that SOLMR grade was a significant independent predictor of OS (P<0.001) and RFS (P<0.001). Nomograms based on SOLMR grades were generated and accurately predicted 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS in HCC patients. The C-index of the novel nomograms was higher than those of the other conventional staging systems (P<0.001).ConclusionsBoth SO and the LMR were independent risk factors for OS and RFS in HCC patients after hepatectomy. The LMR was an independent factor of SO. The novel nomograms developed from the SOLMR grading system combining SO with the LMR provide good prognostic estimates of the outcomes of HCC patients.