Phase I-II trial of weekly gemcitabine plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a dismal disease. Few drugs, including gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have notable antitumor effects against advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU and the efficacy and toxicity profile of weekly gemcitabine plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with histo-/cytologically confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2), followed by a 24-h infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin (300 mg/m2) at day 1, day 8 and day 15 every 28 days, and was termed the GemFL24 regimen. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 1600, 2000, to 2600 mg/m2 in the phase I study, and fixed MTD for subsequent enrolled patients. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the phase I study, and 24 in phase II. The MTD of 5-FU was 2000 mg/m2, with major dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropenia and delayed recovery from neutropenia. The dose intensity of gemcitabine of the 35 patients with 5-FU dosage set at MTD was 593 mg/m2 per week. In the entire series of 42 patients, myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3 neutropenia in eight patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall and clinical benefit response rates were 22% and 46%, respectively; with median progression-free and overall survival of 4.1 and 6.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GemFL24 regimen is a feasible and moderately active treatment with manageable toxicities for advanced pancreatic cancer, and could be a basis for further combination with other anticancer drugs.     

A phase II study of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chemotherapy provides dismal results in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, even when new compounds, such as gemcitabine, are used. Phase I studies of single-drug therapy with docetaxel or irinotecan suggested a response rate of about 15% in these patients. We report here a phase II study of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was given in combination with irinotecan 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Prednisolone premedication and anti-HT3 drugs were systematically administered. Hematopoietic growth factors were given in case of febrile neutropenia or grade 4 neutropenia at the previous cycle. Endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival, and tolerance. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, of whom 25 had metastatic disease. We observed 3 partial responses and 11 stabilizations. The median progression-free survival was 4.3 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity with 18% of patients experiencing a grade 3-4 event. One patient died of neglected febrile neutropenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was well controlled. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: This combination has acceptable tolerance and, despite an 11% response rate, some partial responses and prolonged stabilizations were observed. The treatment induced clinical benefit in 33% of the patients. Further trials should focus on docetaxel or irinotecan, possibly used in combination with more conventional strategies (gemcitabine).     

Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer]

Chemotherapy is expected to play an important role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer because most of pancreatic cancers are being discovered at locally advanced or metastatic stages and recurrence rate is high even after the curative resection. Gemcitabine is a key agent for the first-line therapy of advanced pancreatic cancer. It can enhance the quality of life and prolong the survival of patients. Combination of erlotinib or capecitabine with gemcitabine showed a marginal survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine. If patient's performance state is good, gemcitabine-based platinum combination therapy showed overall survival benefit compared with gemcitabine monothrapy. If the first-line palliative chemotherapy fails, 5-FU, capcitabine, or tegafur with or without combination can be used as the second-line agents. Adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-FU or gemcitabine after curative resection has overall survival benefit. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been proven to be effective in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

AIM: To investigate second-line chemotherapy in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer [(frequency, response, outcome, course of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9)].METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (adenocarcinoma or carcinoma) treated with second-line chemotherapy in our center between 2000 and 2008. All patients received first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine, and prior surgery or radiotherapy was permitted. We analyzed each chemotherapy protocol for second-line treatment, the number of cycles and the type of combination used. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, response rate, grade 3-4 toxicity, dosage modifications and CA 19-9 course.RESULTS: A total of eighty patients (38%) underwent a second-line therapy among 206 patients who had initially received first-line treatment with a gemcitabine-based regimen. Median number of cycles was 4 (range: 1-12) and the median duration of treatment was 2.6 mo (range: 0.3-7.4). The overall disease control rate was 40.0%. The median overall survival and progression-free survival from the start of second-line therapy were 5.8 (95% CI: 4.1-6.6) and 3.4 mo (95% CI: 2.4-4.2), respectively. Toxicity was generally acceptable. Median overall survival of patients with a CA 19-9 level declining by more than 20% was 10.3 mo (95% CI: 4.5-11.6) vs 5.2 mo (95% CI: 4.0-6.4) for others (P = 0.008).CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients could benefit from second-line therapy, and CA 19-9 allows efficient treatment monitoring both in first and second-line chemotherapy.     

Gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with pancreatic cancer show an inoperable locally advanced/ metastatic tumour at the time of diagnosis. The present study was aimed at determining the prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-seven unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine were included in the study and a total of 258 cycles of treatment were applied. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 5%. Thirty-one percent of the patients had stable disease, whereas progressive disease was seen in 49%. Clinical benefit response rate was 15%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months. Median progression-free survival was 3 months, while median overall survival was 9 months. Univariate analysis revealed that worse results were found in patients with performance status (PS) = 2, and in patients with primary tumour location in the body or tail of the pancreas (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis of data revealed that the most important factor was PS of the patient, as the patients with PS = 2 had worse results than the patients with PS = 0-1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low PS is a negative predictive factor for the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine.     

Intra-arterial chemotherapy of advanced pancreatic cancer: a single center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The main aim of the present work was to determine response rates and time to progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Nineteen chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable lesions were treated with intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and epirubicin 60 mg/m2 (FLEC regimen) every 21 days. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were administered on days 4-10 of each cycle. RESULTS: There were 16 patients evaluable for response, of whom 4 (25%) had a partial response, 7 (44%) showed stable disease, and 5 (31%) progressed. Marker response rate was 43%. Median time to progression was 4 months and median overall survival was 6 months. One-year overall survival was 16%. No grade 4 toxicity or severe complications relating to the angiographic procedure were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that intra-arterial FLEC is well tolerated and active against advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer and prognostic factors

Objective. Most patients with pancreatic cancer show an inoperable locally advanced/ metastatic tumour at the time of diagnosis. The present study was aimed at determining the prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine. Material and methods. Sixty-seven unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine were included in the study and a total of 258 cycles of treatment were applied. Results. The overall response rate was 5%. Thirty-one percent of the patients had stable disease, whereas progressive disease was seen in 49%. Clinical benefit response rate was 15%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months. Median progression-free survival was 3 months, while median overall survival was 9 months. Univariate analysis revealed that worse results were found in patients with performance status (PS)?=?2, and in patients with primary tumour location in the body or tail of the pancreas (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis of data revealed that the most important factor was PS of the patient, as the patients with PS?=?2 had worse results than the patients with PS?=?0–1 (p<0.05). Conclusions. Low PS is a negative predictive factor for the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine.     

Phase II Trial of Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Korean Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Prognostic Factors for Chemotherapeutic Response

Background/Aims

Erlotinib and gemcitabine combined chemotherapy is becoming the treatment of choice in advanced pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with erlotinib plus gemcitabine and the prognostic factors for chemotherapeutic response in Korean pancreatic cancer patients.

Methods

Sixty-nine patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were treated with daily erlotinib 100 mg orally and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m²/30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 4-week cycle from 2006 to 2009 were included in this study. This study was a phase II single-center trial.

Results

All 69 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were chemotherapy-naïve. The objective response rate was 18.8%, and the overall tumor-stabilization rate was 49.2%. The median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0 to 9.4 months). The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5 months). Prognostic factors for good chemotherapeutic response were good performance status and the presence of skin rash during chemotherapy. Patients with lower performance scores showed worse chemotherapeutic responses (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; 95% CI, 2.4 to 24.8). Poor responses were predicted by the absence of skin rash during chemotherapy (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.3).

Conclusions

Erlotinib and gemcitabine chemotherapy is a tolerable treatment regimen and has a favorable therapeutic effect in Korean patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Impact of gemcitabine on the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A previous randomized trial showed gemcitabine was superior to 5-fluorouracil in overall patient survival. However, the incremental improvement in survival was minimal. It is 2.5 years since gemcitabine has become available for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in clinical practice in Japan. The current study was conducted to examine whether treatment outcomes have changed since the introduction of gemcitabine therapy. METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were surveyed. Patients admitted before April 2001 received 5-fluorouracil, and those admitted subsequently received gemcitabine. The patients were divided into the gemcitabine group (n = 50) and the non-gemcitabine group (n = 41), and these groups were compared for five outcomes, objective response rate, non-progressive disease rate, carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 response rate, actual survival time, and difference between estimated and observed survivals. The estimated survival time was determined using the prognostic index reported in the previous study. RESULTS: Except for the objective response rate, the four other outcomes in the gemcitabine group were significantly superior to those in the non-gemcitabine group. The frequency of non-progressive disease, CA19-9 response, and favorable prognosis compared with the estimated survival, were 58%, 22%, and 60%, respectively, in the gemcitabine group, and 22%, 6%, 30%, respectively, in the non-gemcitabine group. The median survival time in the gemcitabine and non-gemcitabine group was 5.73 and 2.87 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that there was a definite improvement in pancreatic cancer treatment after gemcitabine was introduced.     

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the major causes of cancer death in Europe with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Although surgery cannot guarantee a cure, the 5-year survival does improve to around 10% following resection and increases to 20-30% with adjuvant chemotherapy. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) 1 trial was the first adequately powered, randomized study to assess chemoradiotherapy (CRT), concurrent with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and chemotherapy [5-FU/folinic acid (FA)] in resected pancreatic cancer. There was a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, but not for adjuvant CRT. Adjuvant CRT also did not improve survival in the EORTC multicenter prospective randomized trial by Klinkenbijl et al. (1999). The phase 3 RTOG 9704 trial compared pre- and postchemoradiation gemcitabine to pre- and postchemoradiation 5-FU. Overall there was no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. Adjuvant gemcitabine significantly improved disease-free survival and later overall survival compared to surgery alone in the CONKO-001 randomized trial. The ESPAC-3(v2) trial compared adjuvant gemcitabine versus 5-FU/FA. The final 2-year analysis demonstrated median survival from resection of patients treated with 5-FU/FA was 23.0 months (95% CI: 21.1, 25.0) and 23.6 months (95% CI: 21.4, 26.4) for patients treated with gemcitabine. Further randomized studies will assess the role of adjuvant combination chemotherapy (ESPAC-4). The key to the future of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer will be the identification of novel and effective agents, and better biomarker technology underpinned by translational research which will inform the design of future trials.     

Clinical impact of radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background

Although a randomized controlled trial for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) has demonstrated a survival advantage for treatment with gemcitabine alone, chemoradiotherapy remains the treatment of choice for locally advanced disease in Japan. The aim of this study was to compare the survival benefits associated with gemcitabine and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable PC.

Patients

Seventy-seven patients with locally advanced unresectable PC were retrospectively enrolled from April 2001 to December 2006. All cases were histologically proven, and patients received gemcitabine chemotherapy (n = 30) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (based on 5-fluorouracil, n = 28, or gemcitabine, n = 19, as a radiosensitizer) at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital.

Results

Patients who received chemoradiotherapy had significantly better performance status than those who had chemotherapy. Tumor response was 0% for chemotherapy and 13% chemoradiotherapy, but survival benefit was similar among patients in the chemotherapy group (overall response (OS) 12 months; progression-free survival (PFS), 3 months) and those in the chemoradiotherapy group (OS, 13 months; PFS, 5 months). Two-year survival was 21% for chemotherapy patients and 19% for chemoradiotherapy patients. Severe toxicities (Grade 3–4 National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0) were significantly more frequent for chemoradiotherapy than for chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine chemotherapy showed similar survival benefit compared to 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy.     

5-fluorouracil continuous infusion combined with cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer: a Japanese Cooperative Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is extremely poor. To improve their prognosis, providing effective chemotherapy is necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of combined chemotherapy (FP therapy) using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in Japanese chemo-naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-seven previously untreated patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with FP therapy. 5-fluorouracil was administered at 500 mg/m2/day by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days and cisplatin was administered at 80 mg/m2 intravenously on the 1st day. Therapy was repeated every 4 weeks until there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Three patients achieved partial responses, whereas none exhibited a complete response. The overall response rate was 8% (95% confidence interval, 2-22%) and the response durations were 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. The median survival time of patients was 5 months. Toxicities were generally mild and acceptable, although nausea/vomiting was the most commonly observed toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: FP therapy on this schedule had limited anti-tumor activity for pancreatic cancer, indicating that, practically, it should not be performed in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Medical treatment of pancreatic cancer: new hopes after 10 years of gemcitabine

Exocrine pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. R0 resection of the tumor is to date the only potentially curative approach, but less than 20% of patients are eligible for a curative surgery at diagnosis. Until recently, gemcitabine was the standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, since it was shown more than a decade ago to induce clinical benefit and to improve survival when compared to weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil. In order to improve patients' outcome many trials have, during the last 10 years, explored the pharmacokinetic modulation of gemcitabine and combination therapies with gemcitabine and other anti-cancer agents with consistent negative results. It is finally a trial assessing the efficacy of a combination chemotherapy without gemcitabine: the FOLFIRINOX regimen, reported this year, that has shown for the first time a significant improvement in progression free and overall survivals. In parallel, many trials testing new targeted agents in these patients are currently ongoing. After 10 years without significant progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients, the hope that a significant improvement in the outcome of these patients can be achieved has been raised.     

Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background  Many studies of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer have been reported with a median survival time of approximately 10 months. Recently, gemcitabine (GEM) has been administered immediately after chemoradiation. The clinical outcome of chemoradiation therapy in conjunction with 5-FU and second-line chemotherapy with GEM after disease progression has not been clarified. Methods  Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with concurrent radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/fraction; total dose, 50.4 Gy) with 5-FU (200 mg/m² every day) until disease progression, followed by GEM (1000 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15, and every 4 weeks) as second-line therapy. Results  Of the 18 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who received chemoradiation therapy with 5-FU, there were three partial responses, giving a response rate of 17%. The median time to progression was 170 days. The median survival time was 443 days. During chemoradiation therapy, the incidences of grade 3 or 4 anorexia, nausea, mucositis, and gastric ulcer were 33%, 22%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. Sixteen patients received second-line chemotherapy with GEM, of whom one patient had a partial response. The median time to progression from the initiation of GEM was 113 days, and median overall survival time was 231 days. Major toxicities were hematological toxicities: grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 75% and anemia in 31%. Conclusions  The treatment strategy with concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance chemotherapy with 5-FU followed by second-line chemotherapy with GEM may be an option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and benefit of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has never been demonstrated although it is regularly used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been conducted. In this trial, a second-line treatment with the OXFU regimen (OXA 130 mg/m2 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), every 3 weeks) was offered to patients progressing after single agent treatment. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 32 patients (12 males, median age 57 years) treated in the single agent arms received the OXFU combination in second-line treatment. WHO performance status was at least 2 in 61% of the patients. There was no objective response and 3 patients (17%) had a disease stabilisation. Median time to progression from the start of second-line treatment was 0.9 months. Median overall survival was 4.9 months from the start of front-line therapy and 1.3 months from the start of second-line therapy. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial bring arguments to support a modest value of second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

Phase II study of cisplatin combined with weekly gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combination therapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been reported as an effective regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the toxicity and synergism are known to depend on the schedule of cisplatin. A phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of a single dose of cisplatin in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with measurable, metastatic pancreatic carcinoma, not locally advanced diseases, were included. The patients were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) i.v. administered 6 h after gemcitabine infusion on day 1 with adequate prehydration. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients, 5 with recurrent disease after curative operation, were enrolled from January 2000 to March 2004. The objective response rate was 16 of 52 patients (1 complete response and 15 partial response). Disease stabilization was seen in 10 patients (20.8%). The median survival was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.7-13.0 months), with 76.1% of patients alive at 6 months and 50% alive at 12 months. The median time to progression was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.16-7.98 months). Major toxicity profiles were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: The modified regimen of a single dose of cisplatin per cycle in combination with weekly gemcitabine appeared to have a more favorable therapeutic index and comparable toxicity profiles.     

Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2)

AIM: FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia. CONCLUSION: FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.     

A phase II study of weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

No single agent or combination chemotherapy protocol, with the exception of gemcitabine, has so far proven superior to standard bolus 5-fluorouracil regimes for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The present phase II trial was designed to study whether the effectivity of 5-fluorouracil can be improved with a weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil schedule. 26 patients with cytologically or histologically verified, metastasized (n = 21) or locally advanced (n = 5) previously untreated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included in this study. Treatment consisted of weekly applications of 2,600 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil as 24-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36. Treatment was repeated at day 50 and was continued until disease progression. Primary endpoints of the study were response rates and toxicity, secondary endpoints were survival and clinical benefit in terms of performance status, body weight and analgesia consumption. Toxicity of the regimen was mild with only four instances of grade-3 toxicity. Response rates were 8% (95% CI = 1.2-13.7) with two partial remissions. Improvement of at least one parameter of clinical benefit for > or = four weeks was observed for 11.5% of the study patients. The most prominent effect was a transient stabilization of objective tumor measurements (48% [95% CI = 27.8-68.7]) and individual parameters of clinical benefit (50-75%). Median survival was 248 days (95% CI = 164-459) for all patients included in the study. The present study indicates that the high-dose 5-fluorouracil regimen shows weak activity in advanced pancreatic cancer which seems comparable to gemcitabine.     

S-1 plus gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and maintenance therapy with S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.METHODS: Subjects selected in the study were patients who had unresectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases, adequate organ and marrow functions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and no prior anticancer therapy. Initially the subjects received two cycles of chemotherapy, oral administration of S-1 40 mg/m² twice daily from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-d cycle, with 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on day 1 and day 8. Two weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, S-1 was administered orally with concurrent IMRT. Oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m² per day twice daily from day 1 to day 14 and from day 22 to day 35. Radiation was concurrently delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/d, 5 times per week, 28 fractions). One month after the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m² per day twice daily for 14 d, followed by a 14-d rest period. This cycle was repeated as maintenance therapy, until unacceptable toxicity occurred or the disease worsened. Thirty-two patients were involved in this study. The median follow-up was 15.6 mo (range: 8.6-32.3 mo).RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the scheduled course of chemotherapy, while 30 patients (93.8%) received chemoradiotherapy with two patients ceasing to continue with radiotherapy. The major toxic effects were nausea and leukopenia. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, the objective tumor response was partial response in 17 (53.1%) patients, stable disease in 9 (28.1%), and progressive disease in 6 (18.8%). The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 15.2 mo and 9.3 mo, respectively. The survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 34.4%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with IMRT and maintenance therapy with S-1 alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer may be considered a well-tolerated, promising treatment regimen.     

5-FU,folinic acid and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P) for unresectable pancreatic cancer

AIM: To prospectively evaluate efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil + folinic acid + cisplatin (LV5FU2-P) combination in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1998 and June 2000, 35 patients, mean age 61 years (37-75), with advanced (n=2) or metastatic (n=33) pancreatic cancer and initial performance status (WHO) of 0 (n=9), 1 (n=14) or 2 (n=12) were enrolled in the study. Two consecutive groups of patients were treated twice monthly, the first group (n=19) received the LV5FU2 regimen: a 2 hour-infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2), followed by 22-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on 2 consecutive days and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. The second group (n=16) received a simplified schedule with bolus leucovorin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) 48-hour infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. Clinical symptoms and performance status were monitored together with weight changes. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 months. RESULTS: Three patients (9%) exhibited grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 31% of the patients (neutropenia: n=3, thrombocytopenia: n=1, vomiting: n=3, mucositis: n=3, diarrhea: n=1). There were no treatment-related deaths. Objective response was observed in 10 patients (29%, 95% confidence interval: 20-40%) including one complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.5 and 9 months, respectively. Six-months and 1-year survival rates were 70% and 25%, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 40% of the patients and performance status improved in 50%. CONCLUSION: LV5FU2-P regimen is active and well tolerated. It should be compared to gemcitabine as a first line therapy in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.