Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL

The combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, given every 3 weeks (CHOP-21) is standard chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas. To determine whether CHOP given every 2 weeks (CHOP-14) or the addition of etoposide (CHOEP-21, CHOEP-14) can improve results in patients ages 18 to 60 years with good prognosis (normal lactic dehydrogenase [LDH] level), 710 patients were randomized to 6 cycles of CHOP-21, CHOP-14, CHOEP-21 (CHOP plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1-3), or CHOEP-14 in a 2 x 2 factorial study design. Patients in the biweekly regimens received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting from day 4. Patients received radiotherapy (36 Gy) to sites of initial bulky disease and extranodal disease. CHOEP achieved better complete remission (87.6% versus 79.4%; P =.003) and 5-year event-free survival rates (69.2% versus 57.6%; P =.004, primary end point) than CHOP, whereas interval reduction improved overall survival (P =.05; P =.044 in the multivariate analysis). Although the CHOEP regimens induced more myelosuppression, all regimens were well tolerated. CHOEP should be the preferred chemotherapy regimen for young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH level) aggressive lymphoma.     

CHOP vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: long-term results of a multicenter randomized trial

Abstract: From May 1985 to May 1989, 175 patients with previously untreated aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive CHOP or ProMACE-CytaBOM. Eligibility criteria included follicular large-cell, diffuse small cleaved-cell, diffuse mixed, diffuse large-cell and immunoblastic lymphoma with an Ann Arbor stage II, III or IV. One hundred and forty-eight patients were evaluable. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatments in response rate (83.5% [57.5% CR] for CHOP vs. 88% [62% CR] for ProMACE-CytaBOM), time to treatment failure (29% vs. 31% at 5 yr), or overall survival (42% in both groups at 5 yr). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the 2 regimens when response rates and outcome were analyzed for different prognostic subgroups. Toxicity was not significantly different between the 2 regimens, although only 1 patient died as result of treatment-related toxicity in the CHOP arm compared to 6 patients in the ProMACE-CytaBOM group (p = 0.126). In conclusion, in this study ProMACE-CytaBOM has not proved to be superior to CHOP in aggressive lymphomas. This trial gives support to the notion that CHOP still is the standard chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas, and that new treatment approaches for these lymphomas should be compared to CHOP.     

Self-reported quality of life in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy

We studied the impact of CHOP chemotherapy on the quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). 132 patients aged 65 or older, who participated in a randomized, multicenter trial, completed QoL questionnaires (EuroQol-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 and MFI-20) on 8 predefined time-points before, during and following treatment. At baseline, QoL was significantly better on almost all dimensions in patients with a lower compared to patients with a higher age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaPI). During treatment, physical and role functioning and global QoL deteriorated and fatigue increased in the lower aaPI group, whereas QoL of the higher aaPI group remained stable. During follow-up, the QoL was significantly better for patients in complete response (CR) or partial remission (PR) than for patients with progression/relapse. Soon after completion of therapy, the QoL of the lower aaPI group returned to pretreatment levels or better, while patients with higher aaPI showed a significant improvement in QoL compared to baseline levels. The effect of CHOP on the quality of life of elderly patients could be used in counseling this group of patients.     

Equitoxicity of bolus and infusional etoposide: results of a multicenter randomised trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) in elderly patients with refractory or relapsing aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using the CEMP regimen (cisplatinum, etoposide, mitoxantrone and prednisone)

To compare toxicity of etoposide bolus with continuous infusion and to assess the efficacy of the CEMP (cisplatinum, etoposide, mitoxantrone, prednisone) regimen, 47 patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma older than 60 years (n=43) or not qualifying for high-dose chemotherapy (n=4) received five four-weekly CEMP cycles. Patients were randomised to start with bolus or continuous-infusion etoposide and then received bolus and infusional etoposide in an alternating fashion. The primary objective was the comparison of differences in the course of leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia between the two application schedules. CEMP was well tolerated with little organ and moderate haematotoxicity. There was no difference in toxicity between bolus and continuous-infusion etoposide. Complete remission rate was 44% in patients relapsing >or=1 year, 27% in patients relapsing within the first year after achieving complete remission and 5% in primary refractory patients. Median event-free and overall survivals for all patients were 3 and 10 months, respectively. The observed equitoxicity and the more challenging logistics of a 60-h infusion make bolus injection the preferred application of etoposide. As the CEMP regimen is well tolerated and efficacious in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma for whom more aggressive therapies are not feasible, a three-weekly modification of CEMP should be tested in combination with rituximab.     

Full-dose CHOP chemotherapy combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in elderly patients: a prospective study

We assessed the efficacy and safety of full-dose CHOP regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to treat aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in elderly patients. Forty-two patients with untreated disease were included in this study, aged 70-79 years, with stage II or higher disease and a performance status of 0-3, without severe organ dysfunction. Of the 40 patients who could be evaluated 87.5% achieved complete remission, with a 4-year survival rate of 69% and a 3-year progression-free survival rate of 49%. When stratified by the International prognostic Index, the 4-year survival rate was 90.9% for the low and low-intermediate risk group and 41.3% for the high-intermediate and high risk group, whereas the 3-year progression survival rate was 87.7% and 11.3%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was found in 31 instances of granulocytopenia (77.5%) and 7 of anemia (17.5%). Nonhematological toxicity of grade 3 or 4 included pneumonia in two patients, heart failure in one, and gastrointestinal bleeding in one. Full-dose CHOP regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support could achieve a high-dose intensity in elderly patients whose general physical condition was good and hence achieved a high complete remission rate, but the disease often recurred within 2 years. Consequently, a new therapeutic strategy needs to be established, particularly for patients with high-intermediate or high risk.     

CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages II to IV aggressive NHL were included in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to II congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P <.001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P =.96 and P =.22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P <.001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF. The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P <.05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy.     

CHOP方案联合利妥昔单抗治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤

弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)中最主要的亚型,占成人NHL的30%~40%[1]。临床上75%初诊DLBCL患者已为Ⅱ~Ⅳ期,而且DLBCL中一半患者年龄>60岁,CHOP方案目前为公认的治疗DLBCL标准方案,但老年患者诱导治疗缓解率低。强烈化疗虽可以提高年轻患者的治疗效果,但老年     

Obesity negatively impacts outcome in elderly female patients with aggressive B‐cell lymphomas treated with R‐CHOP: results from prospective trials of the German high grade non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma trial group

To study if obesity is a risk factor in elderly patients (>60 years) with aggressive B‐cell lymphoma, the outcomes of 576 elderly patients treated with rituximab in the RICOVER‐60 trial were analysed in a retrospective study with regard to body mass index (BMI) and gender. Of the 576 patients, 1% had low body weight (BMI < 18·5), 38% were normal weight (18·5 ≤ BMI < 25), 42% were overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30) and 19% were obese (BMI ≥ 30). Event‐free (EFS), progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to BMI showed no significant differences for all and for male patients. EFS (P = 0·041), PFS (P = 0·038) and OS (P = 0·031) were significantly better for female non‐obese patients. A multivariate analysis adjusted for International Prognostic Index risk factors confirmed these results, with the following hazard ratios (HR) for obesity (BMI ≥ 30) for EFS/PFS/OS: all patients – 1·4/1·4/1·4 (not significant); male patients – 1·2/1·2/1·0 (not significant) and female patients – 1·7 (P = 0·032)/1·9 (P = 0·022)/2·0 (P = 0·017). In conclusion, obesity is a risk factor that influences treatment outcome in elderly female patients with aggressive B‐cell lymphoma treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab + cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone). The inferior outcomes in obese female patients may be due to faster rituximab clearance in obese females.     

Salvage chemotherapy according to the ASHAP protocol: a single-center study of 24 patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Numerous salvage protocols for relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas have been described. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity of the ASHAP protocol, which combines a continuous infusion of doxorubicin and cisplatin with high-dose cytarabine and methylprednisolone. Twenty-four patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were treated with a median of 3 cycles (range: 1–5) of ASHAP. Twelve patients achieved a complete and four a partial remission for an overall response rate of 67%. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 60% and 40%, respectively. Ten of the responding patients were consolidated by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, four patients are in continuous complete remission, while six patients suffered relapses (two fatal). For reasons of low risk profile [international prognostic index (IPI) score of 0, n=2] or age >60 years (n=4), consolidation was limited to involved-field radiotherapy in six patients. All of these patients are alive after a median follow-up of 37 months, with two relapses. Factors predicting a poor response to salvage therapy were primary refractory disease, elevated lactate dehydrogenase activity, and an IPI score of 2. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression with grade III or IV neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring in 88% or 75%, respectively, of the patients. Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild. There were no treatment-related deaths. The ASHAP regimen is a highly active and well-tolerated salvage protocol for patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas which compares favorably with other established protocols.     

Cost analysis of CHOP (-like) chemotherapy regimens for patients with newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Many cost analyses of stem-cell transplantations are available, which is in sharp contrast to the level of cost analyses on first-line chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Given the scarcity of cost analyses of first-line chemotherapy for NHL, it is difficult to assess the economic impact of upcoming new treatment modalities. Therefore we performed an analysis on costs of diagnosis and treatment of patients with newly diagnosed NHL who were treated with standard CHOP (-like) chemotherapy. As many NHL patients are treated in trials and the economic effects of the trial participation are unknown, our analysis included both patients treated according to trial protocols and patients treated according to standard local practice (SLP). The cost analysis was based on the total medical consumption of the patients. It was found that costs of the trial and SLP groups are within comparable ranges, although costs of diagnostic tests were somewhat higher within the trials. In elderly patients, SLP chemotherapy was discontinued more frequently in case of leucocytopenia or thrombocytopenia. This analysis provides basic information about the costs of first-line standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed aggressive NHL and the plausible ranges in which these costs may vary. Given the results, we will initiate larger studies to investigate whether trial treatments (showing more or less similar costs as SLP treatments) are more cost-effective for patients with aggressive NHL.     

波替单抗治疗伴或不伴有肾功能不全的老年多发性骨髓瘤

目的：通过回顾性分析波替单抗（硼替佐米）为主的化疗方案治疗老年多发性骨髓瘤（MM）患者的治疗结果,探讨其治疗效果、不良反应及对合并肾功能不全患者的疗效。方法对2007年1月至2012年12月在解放军总医院第一附属医院住院治疗的46例老年MM患者进行回顾性分析,依据肾功能是否正常将患者分为肾功能不全组14例,肾功能正常组32例;依据是否初治分为初治组25例,复治组21例。分别采用波替单抗为主的化疗方案治疗,比较各组患者治疗2个疗程及4个疗程后的总反应率（ORR）,并统计治疗后的相关不良反应。结果46例患者中,治疗2个疗程后初治组ORR为88.0%（22/25）,复治组ORR为76.2%（16/21）,但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。4个疗程后初治组ORR为90.0%（9/10）,复治组ORR为75.0%（15/20）,两组间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。完成4个疗程时肾功能不全组ORR为90.9%（10/11）,肾功能正常组ORR为73.7%（14/19）,两组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。治疗相关的不良反应包括末梢神经炎、胃肠道反应、血小板减少等,对症处理后均可控制。结论波替单抗为主的化疗方案治疗老年MM患者疗效显著,疗效随疗程增加逐渐提高。对于合并肾功能不全老年患者,尽早使用波替单抗为主的化疗方案,可纠正肾功能不全,改善患者生活质量。含波替单抗的化疗方案在该组老年患者治疗中有较好的安全性。     

Successful treatment of histiocytic sarcoma with induction chemotherapy consisting of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide and upfront consolidation auto-transplantation

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare malignant neoplasm that often exhibits an aggressive clinical presentation. In this report, we describe the case of a 38-year-old female with advanced-stage HS who was found to have a subcutaneous tumor in the left calf and enlarged lymph nodes in the left inguinal and internal iliac regions. The subcutaneous tumor and inguinal nodes were resected operatively. Immunohistochemistry of the surgical specimens showed that the malignant cells stained positive for CD163, CD68, and related markers; a diagnosis of HS was established. Following the administration of induction chemotherapy consisting of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide, the remaining internal iliac tumors disappeared. At that point, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation was performed as consolidation treatment. The patient remains alive with no evidence of disease for 30 months post-treatment. This report provides valuable insight into the treatment of advanced HS.     

Dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) followed by repeated stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of aggressive high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a 4-course high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) protocol including autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) after courses 2, 3, and 4 was investigated in 110 patients, aged 18 to 60 years, with primary diagnosis of aggressive NHL (aNHL), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels above normal. At dose level 1 (DL1), course 1 consisted of cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 70 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 450 mg/m2, and prednisone 500 mg. With courses 2 and 3 cyclophosphamide and etoposide were escalated to 4500 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. With course 4 cyclophosphamide and etoposide were given at 6000 mg/m2 and 1000 mg/m2, respectively. At DL2 etoposide was further increased to 600, 960, 960, and 1480 mg/m2 with courses 1 to 4, respectively. Therapy as per protocol was completed by 81.8% of patients. Overall survival at 5 years was 67.2%, freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 62.1%, and treatment-related mortality was 4.5%. There was a trend to better FFTF at DL2 compared to DL1 (66.9% versus 54.2%). Repetitive HDT with escalated CHOP plus etoposide is feasible and effective treatment of patients with aNHL. DL2 of this therapy is being used in an ongoing phase 3 study.     

Response and adverse drug reactions to combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison of CHOP, COP-BLAM, COP-BLAM III, and THP-COPBLM

We retrospectively compared therapeutic results and adverse events in 198 elderly patients (> or = 70 yr old) with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosed between 1981 and 1995 who underwent CHOP, COP-BLAM, COP-BLAM III, or THP-COPBLM chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 138 patients (69.7%). The CR rate was 47.0% for CHOP, 76.3% for COP-BLAM, 67.9% for COP-BLAM III, and 74.4% for THP-COPBLM therapy (p = 0.013). The 5-yr survival rate was 37.0% for CHOP, 49.0% for COP-BLAM, and 53.5% for COP-BLAM III. The event-free survival rate showed no significant differences between the four treatments. Adverse events of Grade 3 or worse were commonly anemia or granulocytopenia in patients receiving THP-COPBLM therapy. Cardiac sympathetic dysfunction and cardiac mitochondrial damage were less common with pirarubicin than with doxorubicin. For elderly patients, it is better to select therapy with as few adverse events as possible based on the complications and medical history of the individual patients.     

CNOP (mitoxantrone) chemotherapy is inferior to CHOP (doxorubicin) in the treatment of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (meta-analysis)

Mitoxantrone has a broad anti-tumour activity including lymphoma with potentially less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin, which may be of particular importance in elderly patients. However, an important issue is whether mitoxantrone is as efficacious as doxorubicin in the treatment of aggressive lymphomas. Through search of several relevant databases and contacts with lymphoma investigators worldwide, we identified nine randomised studies of previously untreated patients comparing CHOP and CNOP chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Five trials were included where doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) was compared with mitoxantrone (10-12 mg/m2) and the interval between chemotherapy courses was 3-4 wk. In none of these trials rituximab was used. Odds ratios of complete remission (CR) were pooled using a fixed effects model, and odds ratios of overall survival (OS) were pooled using a random effects model. CNOP was significantly inferior to CHOP with regard to CR rate. CNOP was also inferior, but not significantly to CHOP with regard to OS. No formal testing of side effects could be made. However, the two regimens were equally myelosuppressive. Clinical evidence of symptomatic congestive heart disease was not more frequent among patients treated with CHOP. However, gastrointestinal toxicities and alopecia were more common in this group. CHOP chemotherapy is more efficacious than CNOP at equitoxic (myelosuppression) doses. CHOP is, however, associated with more alopecia and gastrointestinal toxicity.