Should the bile duct be preserved or removed in radical surgery for gallbladder cancer?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear whether resection of the extrahepatic bile duct in radical surgery for gallbladder cancer should be performed when direct infiltration into the hepatoduodenal ligament is absent. METHODOLOGY: The results of radical surgery with or without bile duct resection were compared in 55 patients with gallbladder cancer without direct extension to the hepatoduodenal ligament. Lymph node dissection and combined resection of involved organs were carried out according to the extent of the tumor. RESULTS: Nodal involvement was present in 43% of patients with tumors more advanced than pT1. Survival rates were similar between patients with or without bile duct resection in stages I-III, while significantly better survival was observed with bile duct resection in stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the adverse effect of bilioenteric anastomosis, preservation of the extrahepatic bile duct is recommended in radical surgery for gallbladder cancer when the tumor is less advanced than stage IV and does not extend to the hepatoduodenal ligament.     

Should intraoperative ultrasonography be used routinely in hepatic hydatidosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recurrent or secondary hydatidosis are the most important problems of hepatic hydatidosis in the late postoperative period. The spread of cystic liquid, overlooked centrally located or pericystic satellite cysts that are inconspicuous during operation are the basic reasons for the problem. METHODOLOGY: In order to prevent the risk of recurrent or secondary hydatidosis, 22 liver hydatid cystic patients were taken for a prospective study. Beyond the routine investigations and researches, after the completion of conventional surgical procedures, intraoperative ultrasonography was applied to all patients. RESULTS: In three patients the existence of cysts were not found by conventional research (13.63%), in another patient (4.54%) cysto-biliary communication which had been determined clinically but was invisible due to difficulty in anatomic localization was verified by means of intraoperative ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ultrasonography has been thought to be beneficial to find centrally localized cysts which may be inconspicuous especially in cases of multiple cysts.     

What is the prognostic significance of metastatic lymph nodes in GIST?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: So many variables have been identified as prognostic factors influencing survival after curative resection in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but the role of lymph node metastasis remains uncertain. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-nine patients with c-Kit positive gastric GIST who underwent surgical resection at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute between 1983 and 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. The prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis was investigated. The endpoints were overall survival and disease free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 35 months. The 5-years estimate survival rate was 53%. Three patients presented lymph node metastasis and developed recurrence disease. Univariate analysis for overall survival identified the size >13.5cm (p = 0.01) and recurrence (p = 0.03) as prognostic factors. Size > 13.5cm and recurrence were independent factors (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) in the multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis for disease free survival identified the size > 13.5cm (p = 0.04) and the grade (p = 0.04) as prognostic factors but, only the size > 13.5cm was an independent factor in the multivariate analysis. Lymph node metastasis had no prognostic significance for overall and disease free survival (p = 0.65 and p = 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GIST lymph node metastasis was not related to poor survival in this study, but more studies are needed to identify the real incidence and the proper role of the GIST metastatic nodal disease.     

Role of nitric oxide in liver transplantation: Should it be routinely used?

Ischemia-reperfusion injury(IRI) continues to be a major contributor to graft dysfunction, thus supporting the need for therapeutic strategies focused on minimizing organ damage especially with growing numbers of extended criteria grafts being utilized which are more vulnerable to cold and warm ischemia. Nitric oxide(NO·) is highly reactive gaseous molecule found in air and regarded as a pollutant. Not surprising, it is extremely bioactive, and has been demonstrated to play major roles in vascular homeostasis, neurotransmission, and host defense inflammatory reactions. Under conditions of ischemia, NO· has consistently been demonstrated to enhance microcirculatory vasorelaxation and mitigate pro-inflammatory responses, making it an excellent strategy for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Clinical studies designed to test this hypothesis have yielded very promising results that includes reduced hepatocellular injury and enhanced graft recovery without any identifiable complications. By what means NO· facilitates extra-pulmonary actions is up for debate and speculation. The general premise is that they are NO· containing intermediates in the circulation, that ultimately mediate either direct or indirect effects. A plethora of data exists explaining how NO·-containing intermediate molecules form in the plasma as S-nitrosothiols(e.g., S-nitrosoalbumin), whereas other compelling data suggest nitrite to be a protective mediator. In this article, we discuss the use of inhaled NO· as a way to protect the donor liver graft against IRI in patients undergoing liver transplantation.     

Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy?

A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the necessity of a pyloric drainage procedure during an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Earlier data recommend performing a pyloric drainage procedure for all esophagectomies; however, recent studies have questioned this. A thorough literature search (January 2001–November 2011) was performed using the terms esophagectomy, pyloroplasty, pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin, and pyloric drainage. Only studies that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure with those undergoing an esophagectomy without a pyloric drainage procedure were selected. Only four studies, comprising 668 patients in total, were identified that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with or without a pyloric drainage procedure, and two additional meta‐analyses were identified and selected for discussion. All studies were retrospective, and because of the heterogeneity of studies, patient demographics, reporting, and statistical analysis of patient outcome, pooling of data and meta‐analysis could not be performed. Careful analysis demonstrated that pyloric drainage procedure was associated with a non‐significant trend for delayed gastric emptying and biliary reflux, while not affecting the incidence of dumping. No correlation was determined between a pyloric drainage procedure and anastomotic leaks, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and overall perioperative morbidity. While there are risks associated with a pyloric drainage procedure and data exist supporting its omission during an esophagectomy, no good conclusion can be drawn from the current literature. Larger multi‐institutional, prospective studies are required to definitively answer this question.     

Learning of thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy: how can the learning curve be made short and flat?

Attainment of proficiency in video‐assisted thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy (VATS) for thoracic esophageal cancer requires much experience. We have mastered this procedure safely under the direction of an experienced surgeon. After adoption of the procedure, the educated surgeon directed induction of this surgical procedure at another institution. We evaluated the efficacy of instruction during the induction period by comparing the results at the two institutions in which VATS had been newly induced. We defined the induction period as the time from the beginning of VATS to the time when the last instruction was carried out. From January 2003 to December 2007, 53 patients were candidates for VATS at Kanazawa University (institution 1). Of these, 46 patients underwent curative VATS by a single operator. We divided this period into three parts: the induction period of VATS, post‐induction period, and proficient period when the educated surgeon of institution 1 directed the procedure at Maebashi Red Cross Hospital (institution 2). At institution 1, 12 VATS were scheduled, and nine procedures (75%) (group A) including eight instructions were completed during the induction period (from January 2003 to August 2004). Thereafter, VATS was performed without instruction. In the post‐induction period, nine VATS were scheduled, and eight procedures (88.8%) (group B) were completed from September 2004 to August 2005. Subsequently, 32 VATS were scheduled, and 29 procedures (90.6%) (group C) were completed during the proficient period (from September 2005 to December 2007). The surgeon at Maebashi Red Cross Hospital (institution 2) started to perform VATS under the direction of the surgeon who had been educated at institution 1 from September 2005. VATS was completed in 13 (76.4%) (group D) of 17 cases by a single surgeon including seven instructions during the induction period at institution 2 from September 2005 to December 2007. No lethal complication occurred during the induction period at both institutions. We compared the results of VATS among four groups from the two institutions. There were no differences in the background and clinicopathological features among the four groups. The number of dissected lymph nodes and amount of thoracic blood loss were similar in the four groups (35 [22–52] vs 41 [26–53] vs 32 [17–69] vs 29 [17–42] nodes, P = 0.139, and 170 [90–380] vs 275 [130–550] vs 220 [10–660] vs 210 [75–543] g, P = 0.373, respectively). There was no difference in the duration of the thoracic procedure during the induction period at the two institutions. However, the duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in the proficient period of institution 1 (group C: 266 [195–555] minutes) than in the induction period of both institutions (group A: 350 [280–448] minutes [P = 0.005] and group D: 345 [270–420] mL [P = 0.002]). There were no surgery‐related deaths in any of the groups. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ among the four groups. Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy can be mastered quickly and safely with a flat learning curve under the direction of an experienced surgeon. The educated surgeon can instruct surgeons at another institution on how to perform thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The operation time of thoracoscopic surgery is shortened by experience.     

Distribution of lymph nodes in the mesorectum: how deep is TME necessary?

BACKGROUND: Standardization of total mesorectal excision (TME) had a great impact on decreasing local recurrence rates for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, exact numbers and distribution of lymph nodes (LN) along the mesorectum remains controversial with some studies suggesting that few LNs are present in the distal third of the mesorectum. METHODS: Eighteen fresh cadavers without a history of rectal cancer were studied. The rectum was removed by TME and then was divided into right lateral, posterior and left lateral sides, which were further subdivided into 3 levels (upper, middle and lower). A pathologist determined the number and sizes of the LNs in each of the nine areas, b linded to their anatomical origin. RESULTS: Overall, the mesorectum had a mean of 5.7 LNs (SD=3.7) and on average each LN had a maximum diameter of 3.0 mm (SD=2.7). There was no association between the mean number or size of LNs with gender, BMI, or age. There was a significantly higher prevalence of LNs in the posterior location (2.8 per mesorectum) than in the two lateral locations (0.8 and 1.2 per mesorectum; p=0.02). The distribution of LNs in the three levels of the rectum was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of LNs reinforces the fact that TME should always include the distal third of the mesorectum. Care must be taken to not violate the posterior aspect of the mesorectum.     

Should troponin and creatinine kinase be routinely measured after vascular surgery?

The current guidelines for the evaluation and prediction of adverse cardiovascular events (CVEs) following vascular surgery in high-risk patients recommends serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) but not biomarkers such as cTn-I and CK-MB. The objective of this study was to determine whether biomarkers should be routinely measured in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. A multicenter, prospective study with investigators blinded to core laboratory results was conducted. cTn-I and CK-MB were obtained on the day of surgery, as well as 24 hours, 72 hours and 120 hours after surgery, 24 hours prior to planned hospital discharge and at the onset of symptoms of a suspected CVE. The CVE was adjudicated by an endpoint committee using ECG, biomarker and symptoms data and was defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) occurring up to 30 days after surgery. A total of 784 patients, with a mean age of 70.1 (SD +/- 9.8), underwent vascular surgery. Of the 83 patients with a CVE, cTn-I was positive in 42 and CK-MB was positive in 29 on or before the day of the CVE. The number of patients not classified as having a CVE but positive for elevation of cTn-I or CK-MB was 64 and 20, respectively. cTn-I was more sensitive than CK-MB (50.6% versus 34.9%) for predicting a CVE. The optimum time for measuring cTn-I after surgery with the highest positive predictive value was 24 hours. In conclusion, these data support routine serial measurement of cTn-I after vascular surgery.