Methods. Repetitive flexion–extension motions combined with 1472 N of compression were applied to two groups of nine porcine motion segments. Five N m of axial torque was applied to one group. Load–displacement behaviour was quantified, and planar radiography was used to document tracking of the nucleus pulposus and to identify fractures.
Findings. The occurrence of facet fractures was found to be higher (P = 0.028) in the axial torque group (7/9), compared to the no axial torque group (2/9). More hysteresis energy was lost up to 3000 cycles of loading in the axial torque group (P < 0.014). The flexion–extension cycle stiffness was not different between the two groups until 4000 cycles of loading, after which the axial torque group stiffness increased (P = 0.016). The percentage of specimens that herniated after 3000 cycles of loading was significantly larger (P = 0.049) for the axial torque group (71%) compared to the no axial torque group (29%).
Interpretation. Small magnitudes of static axial torque alter the failure mechanics of the intervertebral disc and vertebrae in combined loading situations. Axial torque appears to accelerate the susceptibility for injury to the intervertebral joint complex. This suggests tasks involving axial torque with other types of loading, apart from axial twist motion, should be monitored to assess exposure and injury risk. 相似文献