Clinical trial: once-daily mesalamine granules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis - a 6-month placebo-controlled trial

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 990–999

Summary

Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder. Aim To evaluate once‐daily mesalamine (mesalazine) granules (MG) for maintenance of remission of UC. Methods Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of patients (n = 209 MG, n = 96 placebo) with UC in remission [revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding = 0, mucosal appearance <2] who took MG 1.5 g or placebo once‐daily for up to 6 months. Primary efficacy endpoint: the percentage of patients who remained relapse‐free at month 6/end of treatment. Relapse was defined as SDAI rectal bleeding score ≥1 and a mucosal appearance score ≥2, a UC flare, or initiation of medication to treat a UC flare. Results The percentage of relapse‐free patients at month 6/end of treatment was higher with MG than placebo (78.9% vs. 58.3%, P < 0.001) in the intent‐to‐treat analysis. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.025) favouring MG were observed for most secondary endpoints including improvement in rectal bleeding, physician’s disease activity rating, stool frequency, the SDAI at month 6/end of treatment, patients classified as a treatment success and relapse‐free duration. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusions Once‐daily mesalamine (mesalazine) was effective in maintaining remission of UC for 6 months.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral aloe vera gel for active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: The herbal preparation, aloe vera, has been claimed to have anti-inflammatory effects and, despite a lack of evidence of its therapeutic efficacy, is widely used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease. AIM: To perform a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of aloe vera gel for the treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Forty-four evaluable hospital out-patients were randomly given oral aloe vera gel or placebo, 100 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, in a 2 : 1 ratio. The primary outcome measures were clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index /= 3 points; response was defined as remission or improvement), Baron score, histology score, haemoglobin, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and albumin. RESULTS: Clinical remission, improvement and response occurred in nine (30%), 11 (37%) and 14 (47%), respectively, of 30 patients given aloe vera, compared with one (7%) [P = 0.09; odds ratio, 5.6 (0.6-49)], one (7%) [P = 0.06; odds ratio, 7.5 (0.9-66)] and two (14%) [P < 0.05; odds ratio, 5.3 (1.0-27)], respectively, of 14 patients taking placebo. The Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and histological scores decreased significantly during treatment with aloe vera (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively), but not with placebo. Sigmoidoscopic scores and laboratory variables showed no significant differences between aloe vera and placebo. Adverse events were minor and similar in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Oral aloe vera taken for 4 weeks produced a clinical response more often than placebo; it also reduced the histological disease activity and appeared to be safe. Further evaluation of the therapeutic potential of aloe vera gel in inflammatory bowel disease is needed.     

Eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid in mild-to-moderate depression: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

Controversy exists as to whether eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or both are responsible for the efficacy of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in depression. We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-arm, parallel-group trial, comparing the efficacy of EPA versus DHA as adjuvants to maintenance medication treatments for mild-to-moderate depression. Eighty-one mild-to-moderately depressed outpatients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 g/d of EPA or DHA or placebo (coconut oil) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) final score in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised of all randomized patients with at least 1 post-randomization observation (n=62; 61.3% female; mean age 35.1±1.2 years). Allocated treatments were well tolerated. Although there was no significant difference between groups at baseline, patients in the EPA group showed a significantly lower mean HDRS score at study endpoint compared with those in the DHA (p<0.001) or placebo (p=0.002) groups. Furthermore, response to treatment (defined as a ≥50% decrease from the baseline HDRS score) was only observed in 6 patients receiving EPA, while no one in any of DHA or placebo groups responded to treatment. Overall, these data suggest greater efficacy of EPA compared to DHA or placebo as an adjunctive treatment in mild-to-moderate depression. However, further, randomized controlled trials are needed to support these findings.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pseudoephedrine in coryza

1. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of pseudoephedrine in coryza. 2. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, 48 adults with acute coryza received a single oral dose of 60 mg pseudoephedrine (Sudafed; Pfizer Consumer HealthCare Group, Caringbah, NSW, Australia) or matching placebo. Before and after dosing, nasal airway resistance (NAR), nasal volume, the minimum intranasal cross-sectional area (MCA) and the symptom of nasal congestion were measured. 3. Pseudoephedrine produced a significant decrease in NAR (P = 0.005; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.073, 0.383). Nasal volume increased, but this did not reach significance (P = 0.07; 95% CI -0.842, 0.034). There was no change in MCA and symptoms. 4. In conclusion, pseudoephedrine has a moderate effect in decreasing objective measures of nasal congestion in coryza.     

Review article: maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Seventy percent of patients with ulcerative colitis can expect to experience a relapse over a 12 month period. Sulfasalazine was the first drug demonstrated to reduce this relapse rate to 21 percent. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the main active component, and preparations containing only 5-ASA have similar efficacy to sulfasalazine. 5-ASA is readily absorbed from the small intestine; to achieve high a colonic lumenal concentration therefore requires special release formulation. A variety of 5-ASA preparations is available, differing in their release mechanism, efficacy and side effect profile. Most patients can be maintained in remission using oral 5-ASA medication. For patients with distal or left sided disease the use of rectal 5-ASA is also of proven benefit in maintaining remission. Some patients with frequent or severe relapses require stronger immunosuppression, and in these patients azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are of proven benefit. Azathioprine is also invaluable for maintaining remission in patients who have been treated with cyclosporin for a fulminant acute episode of colitis. The exciting spectre of natural bacterial therapies (probiotics) deserves further exploration.     

Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,dose-escalation trial

BACKGROUND: Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal models of colitis. AIM: To evaluate repifermin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with active ulcerative colitis were enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive treatment for five consecutive days with intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1, 5, 10, 25 or 50 microg/kg, or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of repifermin. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical remission at week 4, defined as a score of zero on the endoscopic appearance and stool blood components of the Mayo score and a score of zero or unity on the stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. RESULTS: At week 4, the rates of clinical remission in the 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg repifermin groups were 19%, 9%, 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively, and 11% for the placebo group (P = 0.32 for repifermin vs. placebo). The frequencies of commonly occurring adverse events and severe adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1-50 microg/kg was very well tolerated, but there was no evidence that repifermin was effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis at these doses. An additional study to determine the efficacy of repifermin at doses of > 50 microg/kg or for a longer treatment duration may be warranted, as the maximally tolerated dose was not reached in the present study.     

Mesalamine in the treatment and maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the GI tract that is characterized by mucosal inflammation in the colon. Mesalamine (mesalazine) is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the first-line treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate UC. There are multiple formulations of mesalamine available, primarily differentiated by their means of delivering active mesalamine to the colon. Mesalamine has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials to induce both clinical response and remission, and maintain clinical remission, in these patients. It has few serious adverse effects and is generally well tolerated by patients. The main areas of uncertainty with use of mesalamine in patients with UC center on the optimal dose for induction of response, how to maintain patient adherence and the role of mesalamine in cancer chemoprophylaxis. Generic forms of mesalamine have yet to be approved by regulatory bodies in the USA.     

Mesalamine in the treatment and maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the GI tract that is characterized by mucosal inflammation in the colon. Mesalamine (mesalazine) is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the first-line treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate UC. There are multiple formulations of mesalamine available, primarily differentiated by their means of delivering active mesalamine to the colon. Mesalamine has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials to induce both clinical response and remission, and maintain clinical remission, in these patients. It has few serious adverse effects and is generally well tolerated by patients. The main areas of uncertainty with use of mesalamine in patients with UC center on the optimal dose for induction of response, how to maintain patient adherence and the role of mesalamine in cancer chemoprophylaxis. Generic forms of mesalamine have yet to be approved by regulatory bodies in the USA.     

MMX Multi Matrix System mesalazine for the induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: MMX mesalazine [LIALDA (US), MEZAVANT XL (UK and Ireland) MEZAVANT (elsewhere)] utilizes MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology which delivers mesalazine throughout the colon. Two phase III studies have already evaluated MMX mesalazine in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Aim To provide more precise estimates of the efficacy of MMX mesalazine over placebo by combining the patient populations from the two phase III studies. Methods Combined data from two 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed. Patients randomized to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily), 4.8 g/day (once daily) or placebo were reviewed. The primary end point was clinical and endoscopic remission (modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index of /=1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from week 0). Results Data from 517 patients were analysed. 8-week remission rates were 37.2% and 35.1% in the MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day and 4.8 g/day groups, vs. 17.5% on placebo (P < 0.001, both comparisons). 8-week complete mucosal healing rates were 32% in both MMX mesalazine groups compared with 16% on placebo. Adverse event frequency was similar in all groups. Conclusion MMX mesalazine is effective and generally well tolerated for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.     

A randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind trial of sertraline for postpartum depression

Rationale

Postpartum depression (PMD) occurs in roughly 10 % of postpartum women and negatively impacts the mother and her offspring, but there are few placebo-controlled studies of antidepressant treatment in this population.

Objective

The objective was this study is to compare the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline to placebo for treating PMD.

Methods

This was a single-center, 6-week, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of sertraline with a 1-week placebo lead-in. The participants (n?=?38) were women with depression onset within 3 months of delivery; a subset (n?=?27) met strict DSM-IV criteria for PMD (onset within 4 weeks of delivery). The participants were prescribed sertraline 50 mg or placebo daily to a maximum of 200 mg/day. Primary outcome variables were the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scores, which were used to determine the rates of response and remission.

Results

Sertraline produced a significantly greater response rate (59 %) than placebo (26 %) and a more than twofold increased remission rate (53 % vs. 21 %). Mixed models did not reveal significant group by time effects, although in the subset of women who met the DSM-IV criteria, there was a statistically significant group by time effect for the HAM-D, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and CGI.

Conclusions

Women with PMD are more likely to have a remission of their depression with sertraline treatment, a finding that is more pronounced in women who have onset of depression within 4 weeks of childbirth. These data support the continued use of 4 weeks for the DSM-5 postpartum onset specifier for major depressive disorder.     

Flutamide in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Summary Purpose: To evaluate the impact of flutamide on survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: This single institution, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study compared flutamide in the dose of 250 mg three times daily (n = 23) versus placebo (n = 23) in patients with histologically proven, previously untreated unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary endpoints included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, performance status and response rate. Results: Both the groups were well matched with regards to demographic, disease related and treatment variables. This small sample sized study, failed to demonstrate a dramatic effect on survival with the use of flutamide. Median overall survival was 151 days with the use of flutamide as compared to 136 with placebo (p = 0.51). The 6-month survival rate was 39.13% in both arms of study and 1-year survival was 4.35% versus 13.04% for the flutamide group. There was no statistically significant difference in time to deterioration of performance status (flutamide 90 days versus placebo 68 days, p = 0.59) and all patients died as a result of tumor progression. Conclusions: Anti-androgen drug flutamide in the dose of 250 mg three times daily does not appear to prolong overall survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine in the prevention of psychotic relapse

Sustained response to antipsychotic therapy is an important outcome measure for patients with psychotic disorders. Placebo control in studies of relapse prevention contributes valuable information yet provokes much debate. This study, using placebo as a control, evaluated olanzapine's efficacy in preventing a psychotic relapse. Participants were stable minimally symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study included 4 phases: (1) 4-day to 9-day screening/evaluation (N = 583), (2) 6-week conversion to open-label olanzapine (N = 493; 10-20 mg/d), (3) 8-week stabilization on olanzapine (N = 458; 10-20 mg/d), and (4) 52-week randomized (2:1), double-blind maintenance with olanzapine (N = 224; 10-20 mg/d) or placebo (N = 102). Primary relapse criteria were clinically significant changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive item cluster or rehospitalization due to positive symptoms. Statistical methodology allowed sequential real-time estimation of efficacy across blinded treatment groups and multiple interim analyses, which permitted study termination when efficacy was significantly different between treatments. A significant between-treatment difference emerged 210 days after first patient randomization to double-blind treatment. Thus, 151 (46.3%) of the randomized patients were discontinued early and 34 (10.4%) of the planned patient enrollment were not required. The olanzapine group had a significantly longer time to relapse (P < 0.0001) than the placebo group. The 6-month cumulative estimated relapse rate (Kaplan-Meier) was 5.5% for olanzapine-treated patients versus 55.2% for placebo-treated patients. The design of this study enabled appropriate statistical testing of the primary hypothesis while minimizing exposure of patients to a less effective treatment than olanzapine. In remitted stabilized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, olanzapine demonstrated a positive benefit-to-risk profile in relapse prevention.     

Oral tobramycin in ulcerative colitis: effect on maintenance of remission

Oral tobramycin for 7 days has been shown to be of benefit as an adjunct to conventional medication in acute ulcerative colitis. Eighty-one patients (40 who had received tobramycin; 41 placebo) who had been enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of this drug in acute disease were subsequently followed to determine whether this short-term benefit persisted. Relapse was defined as a liquid stool frequency of three times daily with rectal bleeding. Results were analysed by the log-rank test on Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Treatment failure was defined as a lack of response by the end of the acute trial period, or subsequent relapse. In a second analysis, only those entering remission at the end of the acute trial were considered, and followed to relapse. Although at the start of the follow-up period significantly fewer patients in the tobramycin group had failed (failed: tobramycin 9, placebo 24; not failed tobramycin 31; placebo 17;P= 0.001), the failure-free survival curves subsequently converged and did not differ significantly. After 1 and 2 years, the failure-free survival rates were 40% (S.E. = 7.8%) and 20% (S.E. = 6.3%) for the tobramycin group and 24% (S.E. = 6.7%) and 12% (S.E. = 5.1%) for the placebo group. When only those entering remission were considered, there was no significant difference in the relapse rates in the two groups. Benefit from tobramycin is therefore short-lived and may reflect short-term changes in the faecal flora.     

Duloxetine-bupropion combination for treatment-resistant atypical depression: A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combined bupropion versus placebo using duloxetine as active reference drug, in patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression with atypical features and a history of treatment resistance, were evaluated in this preliminary six-week study. Patients (n=46) had a baseline Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) ≥14 and were randomly assigned to 150/300 mg/day bupropion vs. placebo, which was added to 60 to 120 mg/day duloxetine depending on baseline depression severity. Atypical features of depression were assessed using the additional eight-item module of the Structured Interview Guide for the HAM-D with the Atypical Depression Supplement. By week 6, only five (21.7%) patients receiving duloxetine+placebo vs. six (26.1%) patients on the bupropion combination achieved response. No significant difference in final HAM-D scores between the two groups was observed between those patients achieving response. The presence of a higher number of atypical features significantly predicted non-response, with the relevant binary logistic regression model correctly classifying 17 out 22 (77.3%) of non-responders [Exp(B)=0.294; p=0.016] vs. 17 out 23 (73.9%) [Exp(B)=0.353; p=0.028] non-responder cases in the “+placebo” and “+bupropion” groups, respectively. In those patients receiving bupropion, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to withdrawal were more common among those receiving lower doses of the combination drug, and no life-threating dangers were noted. Additional studies, including an adequate course of duloxetine trial, are nonetheless aimed to allow a firm conclusion about the usefulness of the combination of duloxetine and bupropion for treatment-resistant cases of major depression with atypical features.     

Safety and efficacy of azathioprine in the maintenance of ciclosporin-induced remission of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that azathioprine prolongs the response to ciclosporin of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis, but no specific data are available concerning its toxicity in this indication. AIM AND METHODS: The charts of 21 patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis who received azathioprine overlapping with a successful ciclosporin course were reviewed for the onset of toxicity. The controls consisted of 48 initial responders to steroids who received azathioprine for steroid-dependence or resistance/toxicity. RESULTS: Two of the 21 patients were withdrawn because of hypersensitivity to azathioprine. The remaining 19 were treated for a median of 18 months together with a median daily steroid dose of 35 mg (10-75 mg) to be tapered off. Toxicity (31%) included leukopenia alone (two cases), cholestasis alone (one case), cholestasis and increased amylase (one case), increased amylase alone (one case), and cutaneous infection (one case). The frequency of withdrawal was 21%. The mean daily steroid doses were reduced from 38 mg to 3.8 mg in the study cohort, and from 25 mg to 8 mg in the controls, among whom toxicity (27%) included four cases each of leukopenia and increased amylase, two cases each of alteration of liver enzymes and infection, and one case of gastric intolerance. Ten of the 48 controls (20%) were withdrawn from the study. CONCLUSION: Azathioprine is as effective and safe in the maintenance of the response of patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis to ciclosporin as it is in the treatment of those who respond to steroids.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of desvenlafaxine succinate in the treatment of major depressive disorder

The antidepressant efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine succinate (desvenlafaxine) were evaluated in a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Outpatients with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder were treated with fixed once-daily doses of desvenlafaxine 200 or 400 mg for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. At the final on-therapy evaluation, adjusted mean change from baseline in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score was greater for desvenlafaxine 200 and 400 mg/day vs. placebo. Both desvenlafaxine doses showed greater efficacy than placebo on the secondary efficacy measures, including the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale scores, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores, CGI-Severity, and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression response rate. Desvenlafaxine 200 mg/day was also significantly better than placebo on remission, Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity overall scores, and some Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity subscale scores. Desvenlafaxine 400 mg/day was significantly better than placebo on selected Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity subscale scores. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and safety assessments revealed few clinically significant changes in vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiogram results. These data provide support for the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.     

Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Seventy percent of patients with ulcerative colitis can expect to experience a relapse over a 12 month period. Sulfasalazine was the first drug demonstrated to reduce this relapse rate to 21 percent. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the main active component, and preparations containing only 5-ASA have similar efficacy to sulfasalazine. 5-ASA is readily absorbed from the small intestine; to achieve high a colonic lumenal concentration therefore requires special release formulation. A variety of 5-ASA preparations is available, differing in their release mechanism, efficacy and side effect profile. Most patients can be maintained in remission using oral 5-ASA medication. For patients with distal or left sided disease the use of rectal 5-ASA is also of proven benefit in maintaining remission. Some patients with frequent or severe relapses require stronger immunosuppression, and in these patients azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are of proven benefit. Azathioprine is also invaluable for maintaining remission in patients who have been treated with cyclosporin for a fulminant acute episode of colitis. The exciting spectre of natural bacterial therapies (probiotics) deserves further exploration.     

Clinical trial: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase II study of subcutaneous interferon-β-1a in moderately active ulcerative colitis

Background  Ulcerative colitis (UC) pathophysiology is characterized by an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Interferon (IFN)-β-1a has potent immunoregulatory properties, including stimulation of host defence mechanisms and thus represents a potential treatment.
Aim  To extend pilot data and identify a suitable dose of IFN-β-1a to achieve endoscopically confirmed remission (ECR) in patients with moderately active UC and to evaluate safety.
Methods  In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with moderately active UC were randomized to IFN-β-1a 44 or 66 μg, or placebo, subcutaneously three times weekly for 8 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up.
Results  Endoscopically-confirmed remission was observed in 23.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.8–35.7] of placebo patients, 29.2% (95% CI: 18.6–41.8) of the IFN-β-1a 44 μg group and 20.0% (95% CI: 11.1–31.8) of the 66 μg group ( P  = 0.45). Improvements with IFN-β-1a 44 μg were greater than with placebo for most secondary efficacy outcomes, although significance was not achieved. Placebo response rates were higher than expected from previous trials. Adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of IFN treatment.
Conclusions  Interferon-β-1a was generally well tolerated at the doses tested, but a significant therapeutic benefit in patients with UC was not observed.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of trazodone hydrochloride in chronic low back pain syndrome

A 6-week placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of trazodone hydrochloride for the relief of chronic low back pain. Forty-two subjects (22 trazodone, 20 placebo) with a 20.3-year average history of back pain were titrated to an average dose of trazodone 201 mg or placebo 238 mg and evaluated daily on a Visual Analogue Scale of pain intensity, at 2-week intervals on an observer rating of pain behavior while walking, and before and after the trial on the Beck Depression Inventory, the Sickness Impact Profile, and a solid state microcomputer (Vitalog) that measured physical activity. Trazodone blood levels and urine toxicology screens were also obtained. There were no significant differences between groups in treatment effect. The results of this study require confirmation by longer trials with larger, less chronic, more homogeneous samples at higher doses with follow-up assessments.     

A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of amitriptyline in bulimia

Bulimia is an eating disorder characterized by a pattern of episodic binge-eating. Patients with this eating disorder frequently demonstrate depressive symptoms when seen for evaluation. A familial association between bulimia and affective disorders has also been suggested. The authors report a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of amitriptyline hydrochloride in a series of 32 female outpatients who satisfied DSM-III criteria for bulimia. The results of this study indicated that amitriptyline hydrochloride at a dosage of 150 mg at bedtime had significant antidepressant activity in this group of patients. Patients in both the placebo and active drug group also received a minimal behavioral treatment program in addition to drug therapy. Both groups demonstrated considerable improvement in eating behavior. The magnitude of this improvement was dramatic and not anticipated. The drug was well tolerated and was not associated with weight gain or increased carbohydrate craving.