Randomized phase III study of high-dose fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion with or without leucovorin versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: European organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40952.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to determine whether high-dose fluorouracil (FU) given as a weekly 24-hour infusion is more active than bolus FU + leucovorin (LV), and whether high-dose infusional FU can be modulated by LV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 497 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive bolus FU 425 mg/m2 intravenously + LV 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and repeated on day 28 (FU + LV), or FU 2600 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion alone (FU24h) or in combination with 500 mg/m2 LV (FU24h + LV)-all given weekly x6 followed by a 2-week rest period. Survival was the major study end point. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of more than 3 years, survival did not differ among the treatment groups (median FU + LV, 11.1 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 15.0 months]; FU24h, 13.0 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.4 months]; FU24h + LV, 13.7 months [95% CI, 12.0 to 16.4 months]; P =.724). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for FU24h + LV (median FU + LV, 4.0 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 4.9]; FU24h, 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 5.0]; FU24h + LV 5.6 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7]; P =.029). The response rates in the subgroup of patients with measurable disease were 12%, 10%, and 17% for FU + LV, FU24h, and FU24h + LV, respectively (not significant). Occurrence of grade 3 and 4 diarrhea was higher in the FU24h + LV arm (22%) compared with the FU24h (6%) or FU + LV (9%) arms; however, stomatitis (11% in FU + LV v 3% in FU24h v 5% in FU24h + LV arms) and hematologic toxicity were higher in the bolus FU + LV arm. Global quality of life did not differ within the three arms. CONCLUSION: Neither FU24h + LV nor FU24h prolong survival, relative to bolus FU + LV. Leucovorin increases PFS if added to FU24h, but increases toxicity.     

Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 trial

LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C). RESULTS: The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.     

Palliative second-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as 24-hour infusion and folinic acid (AIO) plus oxaliplatin after pre-treatment with the AIO-regimen in colorectal cancer (CRC)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as a 24-hour infusion (24-h inf.) and folinic acid (FA) (AIO-regimen) plus Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) after pre-treatment with the AIO regimen, focusing in particular on the efficacy of palliative first- and second-line treatment in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-resectable distant CRC metastases were enrolled in a prospective phase II study for palliative second-line treatment after previous palliative first-line treatment in accordance with the AIO regimen. On an outpatient basis, the patients received a treatment regimen comprising biweekly 85 mg/m2 L-OHP in the form of a 2-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion and 500 mg/m2 FA as a 1 to 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 2,600 mg/m2 5-FU administered as a 24-h inf. i.v. once weekly. A single treatment cycle comprised 6 weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks of rest. RESULTS: During second-line treatment, a total of 26 patients received 340 chemotherapy applications. As the main symptom of toxicity, diarrhoea (NCI-CTC toxicity grade 3+4) presented in 5 patients (19%; 95% CI: 4-34), followed by nausea (CTC grade 3) in one patient (4%; 95% CI: 0-11). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for treatment response. The remission data can be summarised as follows: Complete remission (CR): n=1 (4%; 95% CI: 0-13); partial remission (PR): n=3 (13%; 95% CI: 0-27); stable disease (SD): n=11 (48%; 95% CI: 27-68) and progressive disease (PD): n=8 (35%; 95% CI: 15-54). The median progression-free survival (PFS) rate (n=26) was 3.3 months (range 0-11.5), the median survival time counted from the start of second-line treatment (n=26) 11.6 months (range 2.1-33.0) and the median survival time counted from the start of first-line treatment (n=26) 19.9 months (range 7.7-49.8). CONCLUSION: Palliative second-line treatment according to the AIO regimen plus L-OHP is feasible in an outpatient setting and well tolerated by the patients. Tumour control (CR + PR + SD) was achieved in 65% of the patients, the median survival time being 11.6 months. The AIO regimen followed by the 'AIO regimen plus L-OHP' therapy sequence led to a promising median survival time of 19.9 months (range 7.7-49.8).     

A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare irinotecan with the Nordic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) bolus schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) and FA 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2 (FLIRI)] or the Lv5FU2 schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and infused 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2 (Lv5FU2-IRI)] due to uncertainties about how to administrate 5-FU with irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 567) with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive FLIRI or Lv5FU2-IRI. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced. PFS did not differ between groups (median 9 months, P = 0.22). Overall survival (OS) was also similar (median 19 months, P = 0.9). Fewer objective responses were seen in the FLIRI group (35% versus 49%, P = 0.001) but the metastatic resection rate did not differ (4% versus 6%, P = 0.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (11% versus 5%, P = 0.01) and grade 2 alopecia (18% versus 9%, P = 0.002) were more common in the FLIRI group. The 60-day mortality was 2.4% versus 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan with the bolus Nordic schedule (FLIRI) is a convenient treatment with PFS and OS comparable to irinotecan with the Lv5FU2 schedule. Neutropenia and alopecia are more prevalent, but both regimens are equally well tolerated.     

FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study.

PURPOSE: In metastatic colorectal cancer, phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of fluorouracil (FU) with leucovorin (LV) in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin over FU + LV alone. This phase III study investigated two sequences: folinic acid, FU, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by folinic acid, FU, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6; arm A), and FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI (arm B). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with assessable disease were randomly assigned to receive a 2-hour infusion of l-LV 200 mg/m(2) or dl-LV 400 mg/m(2) followed by a FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-hour infusion 2,400 to 3,000 mg/m(2) every 46 hours every 2 weeks, either with irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) or with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. At progression, irinotecan was replaced by oxaliplatin (arm A), or oxaliplatin by irinotecan (arm B). RESULT: Median survival was 21.5 months in 109 patients allocated to FOLFIRI then FOLFOX6 versus 20.6 months in 111 patients allocated to FOLFOX6 then FOLFIRI (P =.99). Median second progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months in arm A versus 10.9 in arm B (P =.64). In first-line therapy, FOLFIRI achieved 56% response rate (RR) and 8.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 54% RR and 8.0 months median PFS (P =.26). Second-line FOLFIRI achieved 4% RR and 2.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 15% RR and 4.2 months PFS. In first-line therapy, National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and grade 2 alopecia were more frequent with FOLFIRI, and grade 3/4 neutropenia and neurosensory toxicity were more frequent with FOLFOX6. CONCLUSION: Both sequences achieved a prolonged survival and similar efficacy. The toxicity profiles were different.     

Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of two doses of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) versus FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment groups: 36 to FU (500 mg/m(2))/LV (500 mg/m(2)) alone, 35 to FU/LV + low-dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and 33 to FU/LV + high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). FU/LV was given weekly for the first 6 weeks of each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Compared with the FU/LV control arm, treatment with bevacizumab (at both dose levels) plus FU/LV resulted in higher response rates (control arm, 17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 34%; low-dose arm, 40%, 95% CI, 24% to 58%; high-dose arm, 24%, 95% CI, 12% to 43%), longer median time to disease progression (control arm, 5.2 months, 95% CI, 3.5 to 5.6 months; low-dose arm, 9.0 months, 95% CI, 5.8 to 10.9 months; high-dose arm, 7.2 months, 95% CI, 3.8 to 9.2 months), and longer median survival (control arm, 13.8 months; 95% CI, 9.1 to 23.0 months; low-dose arm, 21.5 months, 95% CI, 17.3 to undetermined; high-dose arm, 16.1 months; 95% CI, 11.0 to 20.7 months). After cross-over, two of 22 patients had a partial response to bevacizumab alone. Thrombosis was the most significant adverse event and was fatal in one patient. Hypertension, proteinuria, and epistaxis were other potential safety concerns. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results of this randomized trial support further study of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with a weekly schedule of high-dose leucovorin and 48-hour 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and safety of an alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given as a weekly 48-hour infusion in combination with leucovorin (LV) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested the activity of a regimen consisting of a four times per week schedule of high-dose LV (150 mg/m2) followed by a 48-hour 5-FU infusion (2,600 mg/m2) alternated with CPT-11 (350 mg/m2). An alternating cycle was to be performed every 8 weeks. Treatment was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal occurred. Thirty-five consecutive patients with measurable MCRC, aged 18-80, with a performance status < or =2, were entered into our study from May 1998 to January 2000. RESULTS: Four complete and 9 partial responses were observed (objective response rate was 37%; 95% confidence interval, CI: 21.5-55.1%); an additional 46% of the patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 6.2 months, median time to progression 8 months (95% CI: 5.9-10.1%), and overall survival was 18.5 months (95% CI: 15.1-21.9%). The 1-year survival was 68%. No toxic deaths occurred. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity per patient in any cycle was: mucositis 9% and diarrhea 11% for the infusional 5-FU part, nausea/vomiting 3%, diarrhea 14%, and neutropenia 43% for the CPT-11 part of regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Our alternating schedule of 5-FU/LV and CPT-11 is a well-tolerated outpatient treatment as front-line therapy for MCRC with comparable efficacy to regimens with both drugs given together.     

Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens: a multicenter observational cohort study (TCTG 2nd-BV study)

The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as the second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully clarified, although bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the second-line setting has demonstrated a survival benefit. We investigated the efficacy of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in mCRC patients who failed oxaliplatin-containing regimens without bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or bevacizumab plus FOLFOX as second-line chemotherapy between July 2007 and March 2008 were registered (trial registration: UMIN000001547). Patient background data and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response, and bevacizumab-related adverse events were prospectively collected every 6?months. A total of 195 patients were enrolled from 26 institutions. Among them, 115 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI after failure of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group), and 45 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX after failure of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group). Median PFS was 8.3?months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-9.9) for the FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group and 7.8?months (95% CI, 5.8-9.7) for the FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group. Median OS was 21.6?months (95% CI, 17.6-25.6) and 16.5?months (95% CI, 11.8-21.2), respectively. Overall response rates were 25 and 29%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 bevacizumab-related adverse events were hypertension (5.0%) and bleeding (3.8%). FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU showed comparable efficacy to FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU.     

A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial

Previous small phase II trials have demonstrated that the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin(CDDP) could have clinical activity in metastatic biliary tract cancer. This randomised phase II trial was designed to assess the activity and safety of a high-dose infusional weekly 5FU alone (HDFU) and the combination of 5FU, folinic acid (FA) and CDDP. Patients were included if they had histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status < or = 2, bilirubin <2 x upper normal limit, adequate haematological and renal functions and had not received prior chemotherapy, even in the adjuvant setting. Treatments: Arm A (HDFU) consisted of cycles of 5FU 3 g/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), 24 h infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks; Arm B (5FU+FA+CDDP) consisted of cycles of 5FU 2.0 g/m(2) i.v. with folinic acid 500 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), once every two weeks, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks. From February 1997 to June 1999, 58 patients were randomised (29 in each arm). Patients had a median age of 58 years in Arm A and 62 years in Arm B, locally advanced disease was present in 21% of the patients in Arm A and 11% in Arm B. WHO performance status of 0/1/2 was noted in 48%/45%/7% of the patients in Arm A and 54%/43%/4% in Arm B. In both arms, the most common metastatic sites were the liver and peritoneum. Twenty-eight patients were eligible in each arm and one patient did not start the allocated therapy in Arm B. The median number of cycles was 2 [range 1-12] in Arm A and 2 [range 1-6] in Arm B. Responses for the eligible patients who started their allocated therapy were as follows: Complete Response (CR) 0% in Arm A, 4% in Arm B, Partial Response (PR) 7% in Arm A, 15% in Arm B resulting in an overall response rate [95% CI] of 7.1% in Arm A [0.9-23.5%] and 19% [6.3-38.1%] in Arm B. Disease stabilisation was observed in 46% in Arm A and 44% in Arm B. National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) grade 3-4 adverse events (% of patients in Arm A/Arm B) were neutropenia 4%/26%, thrombopenia 0%/7%, stomatitis 0%/4%, vomiting 7%/14%, diarrhoea 0%/11% and neurotoxicity 4%/0%. There was one early toxic death in Arm B. The median overall survival (OS) [95% CI] was in Arm A/Arm B: 5.0 [4.0-7.4] months/8.0 [5.8-11.8] months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 [1.7-4.7] months/3.3 [2.3-6.7] months. Cisplatin in combination with 5FU+FA showed a higher activity than HDFU, but was more toxic. These results are not sufficient to start a phase III trial. However, our group is planning a phase III trial comparing 5FU+folinic acid versus the same schedule+oxaliplatin a platinum analogue.     

A randomised phase II study of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomised phase II study to compare irinotecan monotherapy with irinotecan in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) regarding efficacy and safety of these regimens in second-line therapy after failed fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 55 patients with mCRC after failure of a first-line therapy were randomised to receive either irinotecan 80 mg/m2 followed by FA 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 24 h weekly for 6 weeks, with courses repeated on day 50 (arm A), or irinotecan 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, with cycles repeated on day 43 (Arm B). RESULTS: Both regimens yielded a partial response rate of 11% with identical progression-free survival (3.7 months for both regimens) and similar overall survival (9.5 months for the combination therapy vs. 10.7 months for the monotherapy). Both regimens were very well tolerated, and the combination of irinotecan with 5-FU/FA did not result in increased toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that irinotecan alone or in combination with infusional 5-FU/FA is an effective and safe regimen for CRC patients who failed first-line therapies. However, the role of 5-FU in addition to irinotecan for fluoropyrimidine failures remains unclear. Due to the small sample size, a decision cannot be made which therapy should be preferred, and a significant contribution to the efficacy of single-agent irinotecan is not obvious from this small randomised phase II trial.     

Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of two regimens of irinotecan, combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), and the Mayo Clinic regimen as first-line therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 152 patients with advanced CRC were randomised, and 149 patients were treated intravenously by irinotecan 125 mg/m2, FA 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen; n=46), or irinotecan 350 mg/m2 alternating with FA 20 mg/m2/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day for 5 days (arm B; n=53), or FA 20 mg/m2/ day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day over 5 days every 4 weeks (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen; n=50). Patients were analyzed for tumor response, time to progression, overall survival, safety and quality of life. The overall response rate for evaluable patients in arm A was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17-49%], in arm B was 32% (95% CI, 16-49%) and in arm C was 26% (95% CI, 12-40%). Median times to progression were 7.9, 7.0 and 6.9 months and median survival times were 22.2, 17.0 and 18.2 months for arms A, B and C, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population. The main grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7%, 39% and 12%) and diarrhea (6%, 21% and 18%). In conclusion, both regimens containing irinotecan were active and well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC.     

Multicenter phase II study of Nordic fluorouracil and folinic acid bolus schedule combined with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This Nordic multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a 3-minute bolus injection with FU 500 mg/m(2) and, 30 minutes later, by a bolus injection with FA 60 mg/m(2) every second week. The same doses of FU and FA were also given on day 2. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 82 assessable patients achieved a complete (n = 4) or partial (n = 47) response, leading to a response rate of 62% (95% CI, 52% to 72%). Nineteen patients showed stable disease, and 12 patients had progressive disease. Thirty-eight of the 51 responses were radiologically confirmed 8 weeks later (confirmed response rate, 46%; 95% CI, 36% to 58%). The estimated median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 7.7 months), and the median overall survival was 16.1 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.6 months) in the intent-to-treat population. Neutropenia was the main adverse event, with grade 3 to 4 toxicity in 58% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed in seven patients. Nonhematologic toxicity consisted mainly of neuropathy (grade 3 in 11 patients and grade 2 in another 27 patients). CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of FU+FA (Nordic FLOX) is a well-tolerated, effective, and feasible bolus schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that yields comparable results compared with more complex schedules.     

An alternating regimen of irinotecan/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and activity of a combination schedule with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP), brief infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) patients. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients were treated with CPT-11 125 mg/m2 as a 90-min intravenous infusion, followed by FA 20 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 over a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8. L-OHP was administered at 85 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 15, in combination with a FA 60 mg/m2 intravenous bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 15-16. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 50 assessable patients achieved a complete (n=5) or partial (n=20) response, leading to a response rate of 50% (95% CI 35-64%). Eighteen (36%) patients showed stable disease. The median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months (95% CI 9.6-10.9 months). After a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median survival was not reached. Grade 3 neutropenia (8%), grade 3 nausea/vomiting (6%) and grade 3 diarrhea (2%) were the major adverse events. CONCLUSION: This alternating three-drug regimen is very well tolerated, manageable and effective in terms of activity and time to progression.     

Retrospective comparison of two different schedules of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a single institution experience

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of weekly irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and folinic acid (FA) regimen (IFL) versus biweekly irinotecan with infusional 5-FU and FA (FOLFIRI) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatments outcome of 86 pts (IFL - 38 pts, FOLFIRI - 48 pts) was evaluated. Chemotherapy regimens were as follows: IFL - intravenous (i.v.) infusion irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) over 90 min and 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) preceded by FA 20 mg/m(2) both given by i.v. bolus injection, all repeated on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 every 6 weeks; FOLFIRI - i.v. irinotecan 180 mg/ m(2) on days 1 and 15 with subsequent FA 200 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion and i.v. bolus injection of 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU immediately followed by 22-hour i.v. infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 152 (mean - 4) IFL cycles and 328 (mean - 6) FOLFIRI cycles were administered. Average dose intensity was 0.8 and 0.78 respectively. Toxicities were mild and manageable for both regimens evaluated. Overall response rate was 36.8% in IFL arm and 44.7% in FOLFIRI arm. At the median follow-up of 16 months in IFL arm and 14 months in FOPFIRI arm the two year survival was 38% and 45%, the median survival was 18 months and 21.5 months, and the median progression free survival was 6 months and 9.4 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, both IFL and FOLFIRI regimens have acceptable toxicity at a similar level of dose intensity. Compared to IFL, FOLFIRI seems to improve progression-free survival.     

A randomized phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of an experimental chemotherapy regimen (irinotecan + oxaliplatin, IRINOX) and two standard arms (LV5 FU2 + irinotecan or LV5 FU2 + oxaliplatin) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a study of the Digestive Group of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess activity and safety of an experimental combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IRINOX) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, 80 patients were treated: arm A (IRINOX) in 40 patients received at day 1 oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) biweekly, standard arm B received a biweekly simplified folinic acid (FA) and fluorouracil (FU), FA 200 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion and bolus injection of 5FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, then a two 400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion of FU on days 1 and 2 with either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (20 patients) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (20 patients). RESULTS: Twenty-one partial responses (52.5%, median duration 7.2 months) were observed with the IRINOX arm and two complete and 20 partial responses (55%, median duration 6.4 months) with arm B. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.4 and 19 months, respectively, in the IRINOX arm and 8.1 and 20.4 months in arm B. Main grade 3/4 toxic effects were, respectively, neutropenia 42.5% and 32.5%; febrile neutropenia 10% and 5%; diarrhea 32.5% and 7.5%; vomiting 10.0% and 5%; neurosensory toxicity 17.5% and 7.5%. CONCLUSION: The IRINOX arm has a manageable toxicity and is active.     

Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the safety/tolerability of the EGFR-antibody cetuximab when added to irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-expressing CRC received cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) as an initial dose, and thereafter 250 mg/m(2) weekly. In addition, patients received infusional 5-FU (24 h) in two dose levels (1500 mg/m(2), low 5-FU group, n = 6 or 2000 mg/m(2), high 5-FU group, n = 15), plus FA at 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at 80 mg/m(2), weekly x6 q50d. RESULTS: Twenty patients were assessable for tolerability after the first cycle. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the low 5-FU group and three DLTs (20%) in the high 5-FU group (two patients with diarrhea grade 3 and one patient with diarrhea grade 4). In the low 5-FU group all six patients received >80% of the planned dose. In the high 5-FU group, seven of 14 patients (50%) received < or =80% of the planned chemotherapy dose during the first cycle due to dosage reductions whilst treatment delays occurred in 10/14 patients. During the whole study period, the common grade 3/4 adverse events were acne-like rash (38%) and diarrhea (29%). Chemotherapy did not affect the pharmacokinetics of cetuximab determined at weeks 1 and 4. Fourteen patients (67%, 95% CI 47% to 87%) had a confirmed response, and six (29%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 9.9 months [lower 95% confidence limit (CL) 7.9, upper 95% CL not reached]. Median survival time was 33 months (lower CL 20, upper CL not reached). Four patients received secondary surgery with curative intent, and a fifth was potentially eligible for surgery but declined. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of cetuximab to weekly infusional 5-FU/FA plus irinotecan is safe and first data suggest a promising activity. The 5-FU dose of 1500 mg/m(2) is recommended for further studies.     

Increasing doses of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Combined 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and folinic acid (FA) is the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The aims of this study were to individualize the dose of 5FU in a weekly schedule in which the maximum tolerated dose of 5FU is administered to each patient, and to evaluate the impact of increasing 5FU doses on response and survival. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (30 evaluable for response) with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with weekly intravenous doses of FA 150 mg/m2 and a fast infusion of 5FU, at an initial dose of 600 mg/m2 which was increased by 60 mg/m2 every week until the appearance of a side effect, in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose for the patient. RESULTS: We obtained 11 objective responses (36.7%, median survival 22 months) and 15 disease stabilizations (50%, median survival 15 months); there were four cases of progressive disease (13.3%, median survival 4 months). The overall survival was 15 months. Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) tolerated 5FU doses of 720 mg/m2 or more. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly 5FU with high-dose FA modulation can be individualized by dose escalation. A 5FU dose of 720 mg/m2 per week seems to be critical, as higher doses are no more effective and lead to severe side effects. This schedule gives good results in terms of response, even though the complete response rate remains low.     

Randomized phase II study of two irinotecan schedules for patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to an anthracycline, a taxane, or both.

PURPOSE: A pressing need exists for agents active against anthracycline- or taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC), or both. Previous clinical trials suggested that irinotecan might have such activity. We conducted this multicenter phase II study to assess efficacy and tolerability of two irinotecan schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MBC patients who experienced disease progression after one to three chemotherapy regimens, including at least one anthracycline- or taxane-based regimen, were randomly assigned to irinotecan in 6-week cycles comprising 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks, then a 2-week rest (weekly) or 240 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The weekly arm had 52 assessable patients; the every-3-weeks arm had 51 assessable patients. In the weekly arm, the objective response (complete regression [CR] + partial regression [PR]) rate was 23% (one CR, 11 PR; 95% CI, 13% to 37%). Median response duration was 4.9 months (range, 1.9 to 15.9 months), and median overall survival was 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 14.2 months). In the every-3-weeks arm, the objective response rate was 14% (nine PR; 95% CI, 6% to 26%), median response duration was 4.2 months (range, 3.1 to 13.9 months), and median overall survival was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 12.3 months). Treatment generally was well tolerated, especially in the weekly arm. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events with > or = 10% incidence included neutropenia (29%) and diarrhea (17%) in the weekly arm and neutropenia (36%), vomiting (20%), dyspnea (18%), nausea (16%), and diarrhea (12%) in the every-3-weeks arm. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan is active with good tolerability in refractory MBC. Irinotecan (especially weekly) warrants additional study as monotherapy and in combination regimens in this setting.     

Double alternate modulation of high-dose 5-Fluorouracil by interferon-alpha-2b and phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic Acid in patients with advanced colorectal-cancer

We conducted a multicenter phase II trial in patients with advanced colorectal cancer to investigate the antitumor efficacy of double alternate modulation of high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (60 mg/kg/48 h = 2400 mg/m(2)/48 h) by interferon alpha-2b (IFN alpha) (10 MU/dose s.c. prior to and halfway 5FU, uneven cycles) and phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid (PALA) (250 mg/m(2) i.v. 24 h before 5FU, even cycles). Cycles were given weekly for 4 weeks and once every 2 weeks thereafter. Twenty one patients with progressive or symptomatic disease were treated ambulatory. Two patients (10%, 95% confidence interval 1-30%) achieved a partial response. Therefore, this schedule of double alternate modulation of 5FU is unlikely to be superior to single modulation of 5FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Since no grade III/IV toxicity (WHO) occurred during 251 cycles, which is in contrast to our previous studies using the same 5FU schedule, it might be possible that alternate modulation allows more intense 5FU schedules compared to single or double modulation schedules.