The effects of ranitidine and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol

The impact of cimetidine, ranitidine and placebo on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, given either as a single dose (100 mg) or for 7 days (100 mg b.d.), has been evaluated in two separate studies. The doses used were 800 mg cimetidine daily and 300 mg ranitidine daily. The subjects were all young, healthy volunteers. In the single dose study, cimetidine produced a marked increase in the peak plasma concentration of metoprolol and in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve; ranitidine had less effect, though the area under the curve was significantly greater than placebo. In the chronic dosing study, the area under the curve for metoprolol was also significantly higher on cimetidine (1796 ng h/ml; P less than 0.001) whereas the area under the curve on ranitidine (1258 ng h/ml) was comparable to that on placebo (1183 ng h/ml). Despite these drug-induced changes in plasma metoprolol concentration, neither cimetidine nor ranitidine altered the change in exercise-induced heart rate during dosing with metoprolol.     

奥美拉唑胶囊人体药代动力学及相对生物利用度研究

目的 :测定奥美拉唑胶囊的药代动力学及相对生物利用度。方法 :18名志愿者单剂量随机交叉口服40mg 奥美拉唑胶囊和洛赛克胶囊 (对照品 )后 ,经高效液相色谱法测定血药浓度。结果 :口服奥美拉唑胶囊或洛赛克胶囊后 ,血药浓度达峰时间分别为 (2 10±0 64)h和 (1 88±0 70)h ,峰浓度分别为 (895 64±553 07)ng/ml和 (974 67±554 93)ng/ml,曲线下面积分别为 (1971 88±1220 98)ng/(h·ml)和 (2057 60±1306 32)ng/(h·ml)。结论 :奥美拉唑胶囊与洛赛克胶囊相比较 ,具有生物等效性。     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between fluoxetine and metoclopramide in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetic interaction of fluoxetine with metoclopramide in healthy volunteers was evaluated. A dose of 20 mg metoclopramide in combination with 60 mg fluoxetine was administered to 24 healthy male volunteers in a two treatment study design, separated by 8 days in which the fluoxetine alone was administered as a single p.o. dose daily. Plasma concentrations of metoclopramide were determined during a 24 h period following drug administration. Metoclopramide plasma concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters of metoclopramide were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. In the two periods of treatment, the mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 44.02 ng/ml (metoclopramide alone) and 62.72 ng/ml (metoclopramide after pre-treatment with fluoxetine). The times taken to reach Cmax and tmax, were 1.15 h and 1.06 h, respectively. The total areas under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) were 312.61 ng.h/ml and 590.62 ng.h/ml, respectively. The half-life values (t1/2) were 5.52 h and 8.47 h. Statistically significant differences were observed for both AUC(0-infinity) and t1/2 of metoclopramide when administered alone or after 8 days treatment with fluoxetine. The experimental data demonstrate the pharmacokinetic interaction between fluoxetine and metoclopramide and suggest that the observed interaction may be clinically significant, but its relevance has to be confirmed.     

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole was evaluated by single oral administration of omeprazole capsule 20 mg (control group), or single oral administration of fluconazole capsule, 100 mg, and omeprazole, 20 mg, after 4 days of daily oral administration of fluconazole, 100 mg (treated group), to 18 healthy male volunteers. Omeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver through 5-hydroxylation and sulfoxidation reactions catalyzed predominantly by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, respectively. Fluconazole is a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP2C19 and a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4. In treated group, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole from time zero to time infinity (AUC) was significantly greater (3090 vs 491 ng h/ml), terminal half-life of omeprazole was significantly longer (2.59 vs 0.85 h), and peak plasma concentration of omeprazole (C(max)) was significantly higher (746 vs 311 ng/ml) than that in control group. The greater AUC and higher C(max) in treated group could be due to inhibition of omeprazole metabolism by fluconazole.     

Lack of dose-dependent effects of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetic interaction with fexofenadine.

The aim of this study was to determine the inhibitory effect of itraconazole at different coadministered doses on fexofenadine pharmacokinetics. In a randomized four-phase crossover study, 11 healthy volunteers were administered a 60-mg fexofenadine hydrochloride tablet alone on one occasion (control phase) and with three different doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg of itraconazole simultaneously on the other three occasions (itraconazole phase). Although the elimination half-life and the renal clearance of fexofenadine remained relatively constant, a single administration of itraconazole with fexofenadine significantly increased mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of fexofenadine (1701/3554, 4308, and 4107 ng h/ml for control; 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg of itraconazole, respectively). Although mean itraconazole AUC(0-48) from 50 mg to 200 mg increased dose dependently from 214 to 772 ng h/ml (p = 0.003), no significant difference was noted in the three parameters, AUC (p = 0.423), C(max) (p = 0.636), and renal clearance (p = 0.495), of fexofenadine among the three doses of itraconazole. Itraconazole exposure at a lower dose (50 mg) compared with the clinical dose (200 mg once or twice daily) had the maximal effect on fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, even though itraconazole plasma concentrations gradually increased after higher doses. These findings suggest that the interaction may occur at the gut wall before reaching the portal vein circulation, and the inhibitory effect must be saturated by substantial local concentrations of itraconazole in the gut lumen after 50-mg dosing.     

Steady state pharmacokinetics and dose-proportionality of phenylpropanolamine in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetics of phenylpropanolamine (PPA) were studied in five healthy male volunteers after single oral doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg of the drug as well as at steady state after seven, 4-hourly doses of PPA. The peak serum concentrations and AUC infinity values increased linearly with an increase in dose, whereas the time to reach peak serum concentrations did not vary significantly between doses. The half-life remained relatively constant with an increase in dose (t1/2 = 3.8 to 4.3 hours), as did renal clearance (ClR = 0.41 to 0.44 l/kg/h). The percentage of unchanged PPA excreted in the urine over a 14 hour period was 64%, 63% and 73% for the 25, 50 and 100 mg doses, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of PPA were found to be linear in the dosage range 25 to 100 mg. Steady state serum concentrations were significantly higher than single dose concentrations, with the mean peak serum concentration increasing from 113 ng/ml after a single dose to 183 ng/ml at steady state. The time at which these were attained decreased from 1.47 hours after a single dose to 0.73 hours at steady state. Both clearance and volume of distribution were significantly different after a single dose compared to steady state (P less than 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found between the other parameters.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Neurochemical studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest deficiencies in the cholinergic system. We evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of tacrine (Cognex), an oral cholinesterase inhibitor, in 12 patients with AD. Patients sequentially received nine doses of 10 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg of tacrine every 6 hours. Blood samples were collected until 24 hours after the final dose. Plasma tacrine concentrations were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 5.1 ng/ml, 20.7 ng/ml, and 33.9 ng/ml following administration of 10 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg doses, respectively. Corresponding mean values for steady-state area under the curve (AUC) were 19.7 ng/ml, 82.9 ng/ml, and 139 ng/ml.hr. Dose-normalized Cmax and AUC values after administration of the 20 mg and 30 mg doses of tacrine were comparable to each other but were significantly greater (p less than .05) than those after the 10 mg doses. The apparent elimination half-life was approximately 3.4 hours for all dosing regimens. Dose-dependent increases in Cmax and AUC values in patients with AD were similar to those previously reported in normal volunteers. The mechanism of the nonlinearity in tacrine pharmacokinetics is unknown.     

Bioequivalence assessment of two different tablet formulations of diltiazem after single and repeated doses in healthy subjects

The study was performed on 14 healthy volunteers in order to compare the pharmacokinetics and hence assess the bioequivalence of two different tablet formulations of diltiazem administered orally. The study was carried out after single doses (60 mg) and repeated doses (60 mg three times a day for six days and 60 mg on the seventh day) according to a randomised, cross-over, open design. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity (ng h/ml), Tmax(h) and Cmax (ng/ml) were calculated for the two formulations after a single dose, while AUCt1-t2 (= AUC for a repetitive dose interval or dosing cycle, ng h/ml) and PTF (peak trough fluctuation) were calculated after repeated doses. The bioequivalence assessment was the shortest 90% confidence interval for the ratio (difference) of expected medians in the respective bioequivalence range (0.80-1.20). The results of this study show that, after either a single dose or repeated doses of test or reference formulations of diltiazem, the pharmacokinetics of the two formulations are similar. The ratios of AUC on day 1 (for single-dose treatment) and on day 7 (for repeated-dose treatment), and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals demonstrate bioequivalence between the two formulations of diltiazem within the accepted range of 0.80-1.20 (80-120%).     

Effect of silymarin on the oral bioavailability of ranitidine in healthy human volunteers

The effect of silymarin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine was investigated in 12 healthy male human volunteers aged 19-26 years. After an overnight fast, ranitidine 150 mg was administered to the volunteers either alone or after 7 days pretreatment with thrice daily dose of 140 mg silymarin. The wash-out period between each treatment was 7 days. Serum levels of ranitidine were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on non-compartmental model analysis using the computer program KINETICA. There was no influence of silymarin on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine. Concomitant administration of silymarin at this dosage did not alter ranitidine C(max) and AUC(0-infinity). There was a significant difference in area under the first moment curve (AUMC) and mean residence time. This result is useful in predicting the interaction of silymarin with other cytochrome 3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates at normal dosage.     

Influence of rifampicin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of celecoxib in healthy male volunteers

The effect of rifampicin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of celecoxib was investigated in 12 healthy male human volunteers. After an overnight fast, celecoxib 200 mg was administered to the volunteers, either alone or after 5 days pretreatment with once daily dose of 600 mg rifampicin. Serum concentrations of celecoxib were estimated by reverse phase HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on non-compartmental model analysis using the computer program KINETICA. A significant difference was observed in AUC(0-1) (4531.28 +/- 2147 vs 1629.1 +/- 1006 ng x h x ml(-1), p < 0.0001), AUC(0-infinity) (4632.42 +/- 2221.75 vs 1629.46 +/- 1012.61 ng x h x ml(-1), p = 0.0006), Cmax (544.89 +/- 273.91 vs 238.61 +/- 146.34 ng/ml, p = 0.04), t(1/2) (9.3 +/- 3.58 vs 4.0 +/- 1.43 h, p = 0.0317) and Cl/f (43.14 +/- 36.23 vs 122.85 +/- 95 l x h(-1), p < 0.0001) of celecoxib administered before and after rifampicin pretreatment. However, time to reach peak concentration, tmax (4 +/- 0.88 vs 4 +/- 0.83 h) and volume of distribution Vd/f (583 +/- 251 vs 710 +/- 690 l/kg) were not affected significantly. Rifampicin pretreatment reduced the AUC of celecoxib by 64% and increased the clearance by 185%. This may be due to increased metabolism of celecoxib due to the induction of cytochrome P4502C9 (CYP2C9) in liver. This interaction has a significant clinical relevance and may warrant dosage adjustment when celecoxib is co-administered with rifampicin in chronic treatment conditions, such as tuberculosis, leprosy and other infections of joints, bones, etc.     

The paradoxical effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on glibenclamide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

The potential interactions between H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, and glibenclamide were studied in 15 non-smoking male volunteers. The study consisted of six treatment phases. Treatment A (3 h oral glucose tolerance test) consisted of 75 g dextrose in 300 ml carbonated water. Treatment B consisted of one 5 mg tablet of glibenclamide in addition to a glucose tolerance test. Treatment C, cimetidine 300 mg orally four times daily for 4 days and Treatment D, ranitidine 150 mg orally twice daily for 4 days were administered in a randomized, crossover fashion. On day 3 of Treatments C and D, subjects received an oral glucose tolerance test. On day 4 of Treatments C and D, subjects received 5 mg of glibenclamide in addition to cimetidine (Treatment E) or ranitidine (Treatment F) and an oral glucose tolerance test. Compared with the control treatment, cimetidine increased the glibenclamide AUC (973 vs 710 ng ml-1 h), but during ranitidine dosing glibenclamide AUC (726 ng ml-1 h) was not significantly different from the control. Apparent oral glibenclamide clearance decreased from 8.25 l h-1 under the control treatment to 6.0 l h-1 following cimetidine but was unchanged during ranitidine (7.97 l h-1). Plasma glucose concentrations were unexpectedly higher when glibenclamide was administered with cimetidine or ranitidine (glucose AUC 237 mg dl-1 h, 228 mg dl-1 h) when compared with glibenclamide administered alone (195 mg dl-1 h, P less than 0.0001). Plasma insulin concentrations were significantly elevated when H2-receptor antagonists and glibenclamide were administered concurrently.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Omeprazole hydroxylation is inhibited by a single dose of moclobemide in homozygotic EM genotype for CYP2C19

AIMS: The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its metabolites in healthy subjects were evaluated to determine if a single dose of moclobemide inhibited CYP2C19 activity. METHODS: Sixteen volunteers, of whom eight were extensive metabolizers (EM) and eight were poor metabolizers for CYP2C19, participated in two studies. Venous blood samples were collected for 24 h after oral ingestion of 40 mg omeprazole with or without 300 mg moclobemide coadministration. The pharmacokinetic change of omeprazole, omeprazole sulphone and 5-hydroxyomeprazole concentrations were assessed to test for an interaction between omeprazole and moclobemide. RESULTS: The coadministration of moclobemide in EMs approximately doubled the mean AUC (from 1834 to 3760 ng ml(-1) h) and C(max) (from 987 to 1649 ng ml(-1)) of omeprazole, and increased the AUC of omeprazole sulphone without changing AUC ratio of omeprazole to omeprazole sulphone. Moclobemide coadministration more than doubled the AUC ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole (from 2.5 to 5.3) in EMs, too. There was a significant decrease in Cmax and AUC of 5-hydroxyomeprazole in PMs but no significant changes were seen in the results for omeprazole and omeprazole sulphone AUCs. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of moclobemide resulted in significant suppression of CYP2C19 activity in EMs. We conclude that physicians prescribing moclobemide should pay attention to its pharmacokinetic interactions even on the first day of coadministration with CYP2C19 substrates.     

Variable omeprazole kinetics in healthy Jordanian adults

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of orally administered omeprazole in healthy adult Jordanian men. METHOD: Plasma concentrations of omeprazole were measured over a 12 h period after administration of a single oral dose of 40 mg omeprazole (Losec), AstraZeneca, UK). Subjects were healthy adult Jordanian men age 18-38 (24 +/- 4, mean +/- SD). The pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the plasma concentration-time profiles for AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf), C(max), t(max), t(1/2e) and K(e). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic of omeprazole were scattered over a wide range. The median AUC(0-inf) was 784.86 +/- 1182.88 (ng.h/ml), and the median C(max) was 521 +/- 354 (ng/ml) (median +/- SD). In general, most subjects showed normal distribution (approximately 90%). Some subjects (10%) did show very high AUC and C(max) compared with the reported AUC and C(max) levels. These subjects had higher half-lives and lower rates of elimination. CONCLUSION: Significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole after a single dose administration was noted. Approximately 10% of the study group showed very high omeprazole plasma levels and AUCs. Differences in the pharmacokinetics might be due to differences in the genetic make-up of subjects.     

Effects of itraconazole and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a substrate of P-glycoprotein

AIMS: Fexofenadine is a substrate of several drug transporters including P-glycoprotein. Our objective was to evaluate the possible effects of two P-glycoprotein inhibitors, itraconazole and diltiazem, on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a putative probe of P-glycoprotein activity in vivo, and compare the inhibitory effect between the two in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a randomized three-phase crossover study, eight healthy volunteers were given oral doses of 100 mg itraconazole twice daily, 100 mg diltiazem twice daily or a placebo capsule twice daily (control) for 5 days. On the morning of day 5 each subject was given 120 mg fexofenadine, and plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of fexofenadine were measured up to 48 h after dosing. RESULTS: Itraconazole pretreatment significantly increased mean (+/-SD) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of fexofenadine from 699 (+/-366) ng ml-1 to 1346 (+/-561) ng ml-1 (95% CI of differences 253, 1040; P<0.005) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0,infinity] from 4133 (+/-1776) ng ml-1 h to 11287 (+/-4552) ng ml-1 h (95% CI 3731, 10575; P<0.0001). Elimination half-life and renal clearance in the itraconazole phase were not altered significantly compared with those in the control phase. In contrast, diltiazem pretreatment did not affect Cmax (704+/-316 ng ml-1, 95% CI -145, 155), AUC0, infinity (4433+/-1565 ng ml-1 h, 95% CI -1353, 754), or other pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine. CONCLUSIONS: Although some drug transporters other than P-glycoprotein are thought to play an important role in fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, itraconazole pretreatment increased fexofenadine exposure, probably due to the reduced first-pass effect by inhibiting the P-glycoprotein activity. As diltiazem pretreatment did not alter fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, therapeutic doses of diltiazem are unlikely to affect the P-glycoprotein activity in vivo.     

Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmokinetics of zolpidem: a two-treatment period study in healthy volunteers

1. Our objective was to evaluate a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between zolpidem and fluvoxamine in healthy volunteers. 2. The study consisted of two periods: Period 1 (reference), when each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg zolpidem; and Period 2 (test), when each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg zolpidem and 100 mg fluvoxamine. Between the two periods, the subjects were treated for 6 days with a single daily dose of 100 mg fluvoxamine. 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of zolpidem given in each treatment period were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and the data from two periods were compared to determine statistically significant differences. 4. In the two periods of treatments, the mean peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) were 56.4 ± 25.6 ng/mL (zolpidem alone) and 67.3 ± 25.8 ng/mL (zolpidem after pretreatment with fluvoxamine). The t(max), times taken to reach C(max), were 0.83 ± 0.44 and 1.26 ± 0.74 h, respectively, and the total areas under the curve (AUC(0-∞)) were 200.9 ± 116.8 and 512.0 ± 354.6 ng h/mL, respectively. The half-life of zolpidem was 2.24 ± 0.81 h when given alone and 4.99 ± 2.92 h after pretreatment with fluvoxamine. 5. Fluvoxamine interacts with zolpidem in healthy volunteers and increases its exposure by approximately 150%. The experimental data showed the pharmacokinetic interaction between zolpidem and fluvoxamine, and suggest that the observed interaction might be clinically significant, but its relevance has to be confirmed.     

Effect of roxithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin in volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of concomitant administration of roxithromycin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of lovastatin. METHODS: In an open, randomized, crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received 80 mg lovastatin orally either alone or concomitantly with 300 mg roxithromycin after 5-day pretreatment with roxithromycin 300 mg daily. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin (lactone and acid) were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of lovastatin lactone with and without roxithromycin were maximum concentration (Cmax) 8.49+/-6.80/16.3+/-9.4 ng ml(-1), time to Cmax (tmax) 1.8+/-0.4/1.7+/-0.6 h, terminal plasma half-life (t1/2) 4.3+/-2.0/3.7+/-2.5 h, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) 53+/-60/85+/-67 ng ml(-1) h. The respective parameters of lovastatin acid were Cmax 24.6+/-13.4/17.8+/-11.0 ng ml(-1), tmax 3.7+/-1.1/4.1+/-0.7 h, t1/2 3.2+/-2.5/4.3+/-2.8 h, AUC0-infinity 149+/-123/105+/-58 ng ml(-1) h. Mean bioavailability of lovastatin lactone was lower and that of lovastatin acid was higher with concomitant treatment. However, the differences were significant only with respect to lovastatin lactone (AUC and Cmax) and Cmax of lovastatin acid. CONCLUSION: Roxithromycin does not influence the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin in such a way that dosage adjustment of lovastatin seems to be necessary during co-administration.     

Similar bioavailability of dexmethylphenidate extended (bimodal) release, dexmethyl-phenidate immediate release and racemic methylphenidate extended (bimodal) release formulations in man

OBJECTIVE: The d-isomer of methylphenidate (d-MPH) is the pharmacologically active part of the racemic mixture of methylphenidate (d,l-MPH), which has been used for decades in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A modified release formulation with bimodal release for the pure d-enantiomer (Focalin XR) has been developed to enable a fast onset of action and a sustained activity for once-daily administration. It was intended to achieve a bimodal concentration-time profile as observed after administration of two immediate release Focalin tablets. The pharmacokinetics of this d-MPH bimodal release formulation were compared with a d-MPH immediate release formulation and a similar bimodal release formulation of d,l-MPH in healthy adult volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 volunteers received a single 20 mg dose of d-MPH bimodal release formulation, two 10 mg doses of a d-MPH immediate release formulation given 4 h apart and a single 40 mg dose of d,l-MPH bimodal release formulation (1 : 1 ratio for d : l enantiomers). The washout between treatments in this 3-way crossover study was 7 days. RESULTS: All three formulations were well-tolerated at the doses tested. The d-MPH bimodal release formulation generated two distinct d-MPH plasma concentration peaks and both peak concentrations and the time to peak were similar to those of the d-MPH immediate release formulation given 4 h apart and the d,l-MPH bimodal release formulation. The three formulations had Cmax and AUC0-infinity values of 15.5 +/- 4.3 ng/ml and 119 +/- 41 ng x h/ml for bimodal release d-MPH, 17.9 +/- 5.3 ng/ml and 115 +/- 40 ng A h/ml for immediate release d-MPH, and 16.4 +/- 4.4 ng/ml and 122 +/- 36 ng x h/ml for d,l-MPH bimodal release, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the 20 mg extended (bimodal) release formulation of d-MPH (Focalin XR) demonstrated a bimodal concentration-time profile and was bioequivalent to two 10 mg doses of immediate release d-MPH (Focalin) and was bioequivalent to 40 mg extended (bimodal) release d,l-MPH (Ritalin LA).     

Single dose pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in young and elderly volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of the H1-receptor antagonist cetirizine were studied from 0 to 48 h after a single oral intake of 10 mg in 10 elderly volunteers (60 to 90 years) and in 10 young healthy volunteers (21 to 29 years). In young healthy volunteers about 60% of an oral dose of cetirizine was excreted in the urine in unchanged form. Mean plasma concentrations were slightly higher in the elderly subjects. Cmax (362 ng/ml), Tmax (1.30 h), terminal half-life (11.8 h) and AUC infinity (4316 ng.h/ml) in the elderly subjects were somewhat higher than in the young subjects (Cmax: 337 ng/ml, Tmax: 1.12 h, terminal half-life: 10.6 h, AUC: 3721 ng.h/ml), but the difference was not significant. The mean cumulative urinary excretion at 32 h was significantly lower in the elderly subjects. It is concluded that the slight differences in pharmacokinetics of cetirizine between young and elderly subjects after single oral intake can be attributed to the decreased renal clearance in the elderly.     

Lack of effect of sucralfate on the absorption and pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of sucralfate pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone following a single oral dose in healthy male volunteers. After an over night fast, and according to a randomized schedule, each volunteer (n = 9) received a single oral dose of rosiglitazone 8 mg (Avandia tablets, 4 mg x 2) with or without pretreatment of sucralfate 2 g (Recolfate tablets, 1 g x 2) in an open-label crossover study with a 2-week washout period. Plasma samples were collected over a period of 24 hours at regular intervals. Safety assessment included monitoring of the vital signs, blood parameters, and ECG. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed for any of the calculated rosiglitazone pharmacokinetic parameters in the two treatment groups. The mean parameters, AUC0-infinity and Cmax, following rosiglitazone administration alone were 3825.02 ng x h/ml and 664.47 ng/ml, respectively, and for rosiglitazone administered after pretreatment with sucralfate were 4848.19 ng x h/ml and 624.88 ng/ml, respectively. The t(max) for rosiglitazone alone and for rosiglitazone after sucralfate treatments was 1.11 and 1.67 hours, respectively. The mean elimination half-life for rosiglitazone and rosiglitazone after sucralfate treatment was 4.35 and 4.51 hours, respectively. Fraction of rosiglitazone absorbed was calculated by the Wagner-Nelson method, and no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed for the two treatments. Since sucralfate pretreatment did not show any significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone, no dose adjustment is warranted for rosiglitazone when it is administered with sucralfate.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between zolpidem and carbamazepine in healthy volunteers

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between zolpidem and carbamazepine in healthy volunteers. The study consisted of 2 periods: period 1 (reference), when each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg zolpidem, and period 2 (test), when each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg zolpidem and 400 mg carbamazepine. Between the 2 periods, the participants were treated for 15 days with a single daily dose of 400 mg carbamazepine. Pharmacokinetic parameters of zolpidem administered in each treatment period were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. In the 2 periods of treatments, the mean peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) were 59 ng/mL (zolpidem alone) and 35 ng/mL (zolpidem after pretreatment with carbamazepine). The t(max), times taken to reach C(max), were 0.9 hours and 1.0 hour, respectively, and the total areas under the curve (AUC(0-∞)) were 234.9 ng·h/mL and 101.5 ng·h/mL, respectively. The half-life of zolpidem was 2.3 and 1.6 hours, respectively. Carbamazepine interacts with zolpidem in healthy volunteers and lowers its bioavailability by about 57%. The experimental data demonstrate the pharmacokinetic interaction between zolpidem and carbamazepine and suggest that the observed interaction may be clinically significant, but its relevance has to be confirmed.