New-onset atrial fibrillation and outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prior meta-analyses have shown that new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) occurs in up to 40% of patients following cardiac surgery and is associated with substantial major adverse cardiovascular events. The stroke and mortality implications of NOAF in isolated CABG without concomitant valve surgery is not known. We thought that NOAF would be associated with increased risk of stroke and mortality, even in patients undergoing isolated CABG. A blinded review of studies from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science was done by two independent investigators. Stroke, 30-day/hospital mortality, long-term cardiovascular mortality, and long-term (>1 year) all-cause mortality were analyzed. We used Review Manager Version 5.3 to perform pooled analysis of outcomes. Of 4461 studies identified, 19 studies (n = 129 628) met inclusion criteria. NOAF incidence ranged from 15% to 36%. NOAF was associated with increased risk of stroke (unadjusted OR 2.15 [1.82, 2.53] [P < .00001]; adjusted OR 1.88 [1.02, 3.46] [P = .04]). NOAF was associated with increased 30-day/hospital mortality (OR 2.35 [1.67, 3.32] [P < .00001]) and long-term cardiovascular mortality (OR 2.04 [1.35, 3.09] [P = .0007]) NOAF was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality (unadjusted OR 1.79 [1.63, 1.96] [P < .00001]; adjusted OR 1.58 [1.24, 2.00] [P = .0002]). We found that the incidence of NOAF following isolated CABG is high and is associated with increased stroke rate and mortality. Early recognition and management of NOAF could improve outcomes.     

Genetics polymorphisms and atrial fibrillation susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) was used to be considered as nongenetics disorder, but recent studies have revealed that genetics variants conferred susceptibility to AF development, but most with limited evidence. In order to systematically evaluate the overall contributions of gene-disease association studies to current understandings of the genetic susceptibility to atrial fibrillation, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comprehensive searches. Method All studies on the associa...     

Left atrial strain,intervendor variability,and atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the capacity of preinterventional left atrial strain (LAS) to predict AF recurrence (AFR) after catheter ablation by using all relative published data. Intervendor variability regarding different ultrasound stations and strain analysis software suites was taken into consideration. The research was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane database, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing echocardiography LAS prior to catheter ablation of AF cases. The systematic research yielded 10 studies (2 retrospective and 8 prospective, 880 patients in total). LAS differed significantly between the patients with AFR and those with no AF recurrence (nAFR) during the follow-up period (LAS_AFR: 17.5 ± 8.7% vs. LAS_nAFR: 24.1 ± 9.5%, p < 0.00001). A pooled cutoff value of 21.9% for LAS was extracted for the prediction of ablation success. Regarding intervendor variability, subgroup analyses were able to be performed for studies using GE and TomTec software. The difference in LAS_AFR and LAS_nAFR remained significant (p < 0.00001 and p < 0.0001 for TomTec and GE, respectively), while significant intervendor difference in absolute strain values was also detected (p < 0.0001 for both AFR and nAFR groups). LAS prior to catheter ablation is consistently lower in patients who experience AF recurrence. Its incorporation in clinical practice would assist physicians detect patients who require closer follow-up. Intervendor variability appears to be considerable and steps must be taken to document it thoroughly and mitigate it if possible.     

Self-reported physical activity and atrial fibrillation risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (83KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Comparison of postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 randomized controlled trials

Background:Presently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as an effective and convenient intervention has been adopted extensively for patients with severe aortic disease. However, after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR, the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is prevalently found. This meta-analysis was designed to comprehensively compare the incidence of NOAF at different times after TAVR and SAVR for patients with severe aortic disease.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to October 1, 2020 was conducted for relevant studies that comparing TAVR and SAVR in the treatment of severe aortic disease. The primary outcomes were the incidence of NOAF with early, midterm and long term follow-up. The secondary outcomes included permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, as well as mortality and other complications. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures provided in Review Manager 5.2.Results:A total of 16 studies including 13,310 patients were identified. The pooled results indicated that, compared with SAVR, TAVR experienced a significantly lower incidence of 30-day/in-hospital, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year NOAF, with pooled risk ratios (RRs) of 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.41; 5725 pts), 0.30 (95% CI 0.24–0.39; 6321 pts), 0.48 (95% CI 0.38–0.61; 3441 pts), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.37–0.55; 2268 pts) respectively. In addition, TAVR showed lower incidence of MI (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40–0.97) and cardiogenic shock (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19–0.59), but higher incidence of permanent PM (RR 3.16; 95% CI 1.61–6.21) and major vascular complications (RR 2.22; 95% CI 1.14–4.32) at 30-day/in-hospital. At 1- and 2-year after procedure, compared with SAVR, TAVR experienced a significantly higher incidence of neurological events, transient ischemic attacks (TIA), permanent PM, and major vascular complications, respectively. At 5-year after procedure, compared with SAVR, TAVR experienced a significantly higher incidence of TIA and re-intervention respectively. There was no difference in 30-day, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year all-cause or cardiovascular mortality as well as stroke between TAVR and SAVR.Conclusions:Our analysis showed that TAVR was superior to SAVR in decreasing the both short and long term postprocedural NOAF. TAVR was equal to SAVR in early, midterm and long term mortality. In addition, TAVR showed lower incidence of 30-day/in-hospital MI and cardiogenic shock after procedure. However, pooled results showed that TAVR was inferior to SAVR in reducing permanent pacemaker implantation, neurological events, TIA, major vascular complications, and re-intervention.     

Efficacy of intravenous magnesium for the management of non-post operative atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Intravenous magnesium (IV Mg), a commonly utilized therapeutic agent in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response, is thought to exert its influence via its effect on cellular automaticity and prolongation of atrial and atrioventricular nodal refractoriness thus reducing ventricular rate. We sought to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of IV Mg versus placebo in addition to standard pharmacotherapy in the rate and rhythm control of AF in the nonpostoperative patient cohort given that randomized control trials (RCTs) have shown conflicting results.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials comparing IV Mg versus placebo in addition to standard of care were identified via electronic database searches. Nine RCTs were returned with a total of 1048 patients. Primary efficacy endpoints were study-defined rate control and rhythm control/reversion to sinus rhythm. The secondary endpoint was patient experienced side effects.

Results

Our analysis found IV Mg in addition to standard care was successful in achieving rate control (odd ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13−3.11, p = .02) and rhythm control (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04−2.03, p = .03). Although not well reported among studies, there was no significant difference between groups regarding the likelihood of experiencing side effects.

Conclusions

IV Mg, in addition to standard-of-care pharmacotherapy, increases the rates of successful rate and rhythm control in nonpostoperative patients with AF with rapid ventricular response and is well tolerated.     

Upregulated miR-328-3p and its high risk in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

Background:Several studies have shown miR-328-3p increased in atrial fibrillation (AF), but some researches indicated no difference or even decreased. This inconsistent result confuses researchers, and it is urgent to know the truth. This study is to assess the association between miR-328-3p levels in plasma/atrial tissue and patients with AF.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest were searched from inception to February 1, 2021. The standardized mean differences (SMD) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the association between miR-328-3p levels and AF.Results:Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for our meta-analysis. Overall, the levels of miR-328-3p were higher in patients with AF than in the control group (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI [0.10, 1.28], P = .022). After adjustment, the overall SMD was 0.82 (95% CI [0.22, 1.42], P = .007). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable, and the trim-fill analysis showed that the results were credible. Subgroup analyses showed that AF patients, n ≥ 30, various of comorbidity, articles published earlier, and Asia groups had higher levels of expression of miR-328-3p.Conclusions:High levels of miR-328-3p are significantly associated with an increased risk of AF. It implies that miR-328-3p played an important role in diagnosis and may serve as a potential momentous, and useful biomarker to identify AF.     

Efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset AF.Methods:A comprehensive systematic literature search will be conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the vernakalant with AF. Two reviewers will independently assess the quality of the selected studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration''s tool for RCTs. The bias risk of the RCT will be assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results from these questions will be graphed and assessed using Review Manager 5.3.Results:The results of this meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Conclusion:This review will evaluate the safety and efficacy of vernakalant for patients with AF, provide more recommendations for patients or researchers, and high-level evidence for clinical decision-making.     

Physical activity and incidence of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether physical activity increases or decreases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between AF and extent of physical activity.     

Association of gut microbiome dysbiosis with the progression of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review

Objective

Many clinical and preclinical studies have implicated an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and its progression to imbalances in the gut microbiome composition. The gut microbiome is a diverse and complex ecosystem containing billions of microorganisms that produce biologically active metabolites influencing the host disease development.

Methods

For this review, a literature search was conducted using digital databases to systematically identify the studies reporting the association of gut microbiota with AF progression.

Results

In a total of 14 studies, 2479 patients were recruited for the final analysis. More than half (n = 8) of the studies reported alterations in alpha diversity in atrial fibrillation. As for the beta diversity, 10 studies showed significant alterations. Almost all studies that assessed gut microbiota alterations reported major taxa associated with atrial fibrillation. Most studies focused on short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), whereas three studies evaluated TMAO levels in the blood, which is the breakdown product of dietary l -carnitine, choline, and lecithin. Moreover, an independent cohort study assessed the relationship between phenylacetylglutamine (PAGIn) and AF.

Conclusion

Intestinal dysbiosis is a modifiable risk factor that might provide newer treatment strategies for AF prevention. Well-designed research and prospective randomized interventional studies are required to target the gut dysbiotic mechanisms and determine the gut dysbiotic-AF relationship.     

Relationship between serum uric acid levels and different types of atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis

AimIncreasing evidence supports the hypothesis that high serum uric acid (SUA) levels are related to atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the incidence of AF in patients with hyperuricemia and SUA levels in different types of AF is not entirely clear. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the relationship between SUA and incidence of AF, and the variation in SUA levels in different types of AF.Data synthesisRelevant reports were searched for in Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. A fixed-effects model combining relative risk (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to evaluate the correlation between SUA and AF. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) of SUA values were calculated using a random-effects model to evaluate the differences in SUA levels among different types of AF.A total of 31 studies with 504,958 participants were included in this research. The results from 8 cohort studies showed that high SUA levels significantly increased the incidence of AF [RR (95% CI): 1.92 (1.68–2.20); P < 0.01]. The results from 29 studies revealed that SUA levels elevated in patients with AF [SMD (95% CI): 0.55 (0.43–0.66); P < 0.001]. Meanwhile, SUA levels in new-onset AF [SMD (95%CI): 0.24 (0.10–0.38); P = 0.001], paroxysmal AF [SMD (95%CI): 0.52 (0.33–0.72); P < 0.001] and persistent AF [SMD (95%CI): 1.23 (0.98–1.48); P < 0.001] were significantly higher than that in patients without AF.ConclusionsHigh SUA levels had an obvious correlation with the occurrence rate of AF. In addition, SUA levels were significantly different among patients with new-onset, paroxysmal and persistent AF.     

The efficacy of high-power short-duration radiofrequency for atrial fibrillation ablation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Studies comparing data between the high-power short-duration radiofrequency (HPSR) and low power longer duration therapy were limited and inconsistent. Therefore, we conduct a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of HPSR on outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods:The online literature is searched using the following combination of medical subject heading terms: “high-power” OR “high power” AND “radiofrequency” AND “atrial fibrillation.” MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science (ISI database) will be searched without any language restrictions. All clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of HPSR in the treatment of atrial fibrillation will be considered eligible for analysis. The present study will be performed by Review Manager Software (RevMan Version 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Ethical approval and patient consent are not required because this study is a literature-based study.Results:This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of HPSR on outcomes for patients with AF.Registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/WAEBN.     

Management of stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation with anti-thrombotic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction:Long term management of patients with stable coronary artery disease of >1 year after myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation is unclear. Current guidelines recommend using oral anti-coagulation (OAC) alone although the recommendation is weak and there is low quality evidence. Two new randomized control trials (RCTs) were published recently. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of these studies on patient outcomesObjective:To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs and observational studies to compare OAC alone versus OAC plus single anti-platelet therapy.Methods:Electronic searches were conducted using appropriate terms from 3 databases. Relevant studies included. Data extracted and analysis were performed using STATA.Measurements:Summary statistics were pooled and measured for primary and secondary outcomes of both treatment arms.Main results:Eight studies involving 10,120 patients were included for the analysis. Five thousand two hundred thirty-seven patients were on combination therapy while 4883 were on OAC alone. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.067; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.912–1.249; P value .417). There was no statistically significant difference even in the measured secondary outcomes namely all cause mortality (HR 1.048; 95% CI 0.830–1.323; P value .695), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.863; 95% CI 0.593–1.254; P value .439). However, we found statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the incidence of MI with higher incidence in mono therapy group (HR 1.229; 95% CI 1.011–1.495; P value .039) and higher incidence of major bleeding in the combination therapy group in the subgroup analysis (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.464–0.907; P value .011).Conclusion:We found no reduction of major adverse cardiac event between combination therapy and mono therapy. Although mono therapy showed increased risk of major bleeding overall, subgroup analysis of the RCTs showed increased risk of major bleeding in the combination therapy group. MI was higher in the mono therapy group compared to the combination therapy group, however this outcome was not reproducible in the subgroup analysis of the RCTs.