Modern antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease

Dual antiplatelet therapy is well recognized in the prevention of thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite clinical benefits of aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, a number of limitations curtail their efficacy: slow onset of action, variability in platelet inhibitory response and potential drug–drug interactions. Furthermore, the single platelet-activation pathway targeted by these agents allows continued platelet activation via other pathways, ensuring incomplete protection against ischemic events, thus, underscoring the need for alternate antiplatelet treatment strategies. A number of novel antiplatelet agents are currently in advance development and many have established superior effects on platelet inhibition, clinical outcomes and safety profile than clopidogrel in high-risk patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current status of P2Y12 receptor inhibition and PAR-1 antagonists in determining a future strategy for individualized antiplatelet therapy.     

Antiplatelet options for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndromes

Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy, a combination of aspirin and a P2Y(12) inhibitor, for 6?12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in all patients and for 1 year in all patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), irrespective of revascularization strategy. Clopidogrel has a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile that results in a delayed and/or subtherapeutic antiplatelet effect, and wide variability in antiplatelet response. New P2Y(12) inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have favorable pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy over clopidogrel and offer an alternative antiplatelet treatment strategy in specific patients. Prasugrel has more potent, rapid, and consistent effects on inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor also appears to have more rapid and consistent antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel. The higher levels of antiplatelet inhibition provided by prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with standard-dose clopidogrel result in improved ischemic outcomes in patients with ACS. Despite an increase in bleeding risk, prasugrel and ticagrelor appear to have a better net clinical benefit, especially in higher-risk patients with ACS.     

Elinogrel, an orally and intravenously available ADP-receptor antagonist. How does elinogrel affect a personalized antiplatelet therapy?

The antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and the ADP-receptor blocker clopidogrel is currently the standard medication after coronary intervention or after acute coronary syndrome to prevent recurrent ischemic events and reduce mortality. However, high interindividual response variability to antiplatelet treatment is described in up to 44% of treated patients. A poor response to clopidogrel is caused by multifactorial mechanisms. Individual risk assessment including platelet function testing (PFT) can help to identify high risk patients, although recent randomized trials to investigate effects of PFT-guided therapy have failed to detect an impact on prognostic outcome. Poor response to standard antiplatelet agents can be overcome by switching to alternate substances. Elinogrel is a novel competitive, reversible ADP-receptor antagonist available in oral and intravenous formulation. Additional treatment with elinogrel showed advantages over clopidogrel, including more rapid, less variable, and more complete inhibition of platelet function without significantly increased bleeding complications. This review gives an overview over the investigational drug elinogrel for use in a personalized antiplatelet approach.     

抗血小板治疗实验室监测之我见

抗血小板药物在各种动脉血栓性疾病防治中具有重要地位。虽然目前抗血小板药物多采用固定剂量给药,但不同患者对抗血小板治疗的反应性存在明显差异。治疗后的血小板高反应性或低反应性可能与血栓事件或出血事件风险相关。基于血小板功能检测的个体化抗血小板治疗方案可能有助于预防血栓或出血不良事件的发生,但目前仍缺乏上述治疗策略能够最终改善患者预后的确切临床证据。迄今为止,对于接受抗血小板治疗的患者是否应常规进行实验室监测仍存在诸多争议。本文对抗血小板治疗反应多样性的成因及血小板功能检测是否可用于指导个体化抗血小板治疗进行讨论。     

脑梗死患者抗血小板药物的精准策略选择

抗血小板治疗是脑梗死全程管理的重要手段之一,然而临床上存在抗血小板药物个体反应差异且其与患者预后密切相关,因此精准选择抗血小板药物具有重要意义。血小板功能检测及基因检测是抗血小板药物精准治疗的核心环节。对于存在高危缺血风险或预后较差、有高出血风险的患者,可考虑行基因检测和（或）血小板功能检测。阿司匹林和氯吡格雷仍是目前最常用的抗血小板药物,其他抗血小板药物的有效性及安全性有待进一步验证。对于阿司匹林抵抗人群,不推荐增加阿司匹林剂量,可考虑换用其他抗血小板药物。基于CYP2C19基因型进行氯吡格雷剂量调整的策略仍有待研究,而携带CYP2C19失功能等位基因的患者,建议换用其他抗血小板药物。     

Unmet needs in oral antiplatelet therapy with ADP receptor blocking agents

Antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel are treatment cornerstones for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Drawbacks of dual therapy with these agents include slow onset and offset of effect and wide response variability. Clopidogrel may provide little benefit if administered too close to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and increase major bleeding risk if given too close to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or other surgery. It may not provide sufficient antiplatelet coverage prior to CABG if stopped too long before intervention and leave patients without antiplatelet coverage due to hyporesponsiveness. Prasugrel has made steps towards addressing these limitations by exhibiting more efficient metabolism, more rapid onset of effect, and greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. The TRITON-TIMI38 trial in ACS patients undergoing PCI showed prasugrel produced greater ischemic event protection than clopidogrel but significantly increased major bleeding risk. AZD6140, the first reversible oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, provides more rapid onset of effect and greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. In DISPERSE2, a phase II trial in ACS patients, AZD6140 did not increase bleeding risk, reduced bleeding risk among CABG patients, and produced numerical reductions in myocardial infarction risk. AZD6140 is being compared with clopidogrel in PLATO, a phase III trial in approximately 18000 ACS patients.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus: special considerations

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher rates of ischemic events in patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, thereby underscoring the need to develop more effective and specific strategies toward mitigation of the cardiovascular burden associated with DM. Platelet hyper-reactivity associated with DM is a central contributor to this high risk, since platelets are the key players in the processes underpinning atherothrombotic complications, thereby representing a specific therapeutic target. Oral dual antiplatelet therapy comprising the combination of aspirin (75–100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) has been, for years, the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, despite the use of this therapy, high rates of cardiovascular events continue to occur, especially within the cohort of patients with DM. These observations could be in part explained by an inadequate clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, which has been associated with impaired clinical outcomes. In particular, DM is associated with a higher prevalence of reduced responsiveness to standard dual antiplatelet therapy, which may contribute to the higher rates of ischemic events seen in this population. These findings have prompted the identification of alternative dual antiplatelet treatment regimens to optimize platelet inhibition. The present review aims to describe benefits and limitations of oral dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (75 mg) and to appraise the evidence regarding alternative oral dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, which include higher doses of aspirin and clopidogrel or the combination of prasugrel or ticagrelor with aspirin, focusing on patients with DM.     

Antiplatelet options for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndromes

Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy, a combination of aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, for 6–12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in all patients and for 1 year in all patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), irrespective of revascularization strategy. Clopidogrel has a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile that results in a delayed and/or subtherapeutic antiplatelet effect, and wide variability in antiplatelet response. New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have favorable pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy over clopidogrel and offer an alternative antiplatelet treatment strategy in specific patients. Prasugrel has more potent, rapid, and consistent effects on inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor also appears to have more rapid and consistent antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel. The higher levels of antiplatelet inhibition provided by prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with standard-dose clopidogrel result in improved ischemic outcomes in patients with ACS. Despite an increase in bleeding risk, prasugrel and ticagrelor appear to have a better net clinical benefit, especially in higher-risk patients with ACS.     

New Antiplatelet Agents and the Role of Platelet Function Testing in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a guideline mandated for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite its use, thrombotic events continue to occur both early and late. Platelet function testing has been used to define the in vitro effects of new antiplatelet agents, and it has been suggested that it be used to choose therapy. The role of platelet function testing, particularly with newer antiplatelet agents, remains unclear.

Objective

We review the rationale for platelet function testing and its application in monitoring patients on antiplatelet therapy. We also review recent clinical trials of newer antiplatelet agents. On the basis of this review, we reach conclusions on the current role of antiplatelet function testing in monitoring modern antiplatelet therapy and the role of the new antiplatelet agents in the treatment of ACS.

Methods

We reviewed recent publications on platelet function testing and clinical trials of newer antiplatelet therapies compared with clopidogrel.

Results

Platelet function testing is complex, but there is now a bedside test, VerifyNow. High platelet reactivity has been associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Recent clinical trials have not found any advantage in outcomes in patients who have their therapy adjusted by monitoring their platelet function. Newer agents, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor, produce more rapid, complete, less variable effects on platelet function than clopidogrel. Prasugrel was found to improve outcomes compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous intervention. Ticagrelor is beneficial in all patients with ACS and reduces cardiovascular mortality compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor improves outcomes in patients undergoing stenting. Recent studies to assess the role of platelet function monitoring of the effects of clopidogrel and modifying treatments have not been successful.

Conclusion

Recent clinical trials have indicated that newer antiplatelet agents have advantages over clopidogrel in the treatment of ACS. Platelet function testing gives us a guide to the timing, efficacy, and variability of therapy and can correlate with poor patient outcomes; however, the use of antiplatelet function testing to tailor therapy does not seem appropriate.     

Prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel represents the key treatment strategy for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a broad inter-individual response variability to such treatment strategy, and a considerable number of patients persist with inadequate platelet inhibition, which has been associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. Overall, these findings underscore the need for novel antiplatelet agents able to achieve greater platelet inhibition; this can potentially reduce ischemic event rates. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY 640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor. Laboratory studies have shown prasugrel to be associated with more prompt, potent and predictable degrees of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. In a large-scale clinical study, which was comprised of high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI, prasugrel was shown to significantly reduce the short- and long-term risk of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis. However, such significant reduction in ischemic events occurred at the expense of a higher risk of bleeding. Recent clinical trial data analyses have led to a better understanding of the efficacy and safety of prasugrel. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel in ACS patients.     

Mechanism of action and clinical development of platelet thrombin receptor antagonists

Atherothrombotic disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists has shown improved short- and long-term clinical outcomes but is associated with increased bleeding risk, and the rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high. Selective inhibition of the principal protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 for thrombin, the most potent platelet activator, represents a promising novel strategy to reduce ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Two PAR-1 antagonists are currently being tested in clinical trials: SCH 530348 and E5555. Both have demonstrated an antiplatelet effect without increasing bleeding time in preclinical trials. Results of Phase II trials showed that SCH 530348, in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, was well tolerated and not associated with increased bleeding risk. The safety and tolerability of E5555 is being evaluated in patients with coronary artery disease and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in four Phase II clinical trials. Two large-scale Phase III trials assessing the efficacy of SCH 530348 in addition to the standard of care are currently ongoing. This article provides an overview of the current status of knowledge on platelet thrombin receptor antagonists, focusing on pharmacologic properties and clinical development.     

Variable effect of P2Y12 inhibition on platelet thrombus volume in flowing blood

Summary. Background and objectives: Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention receive aspirin and P2Y12 ADP receptor inhibitors to reduce thrombotic complications. The choice of methodology for monitoring the effects of treatment and assessing its efficacy is still a topic of debate. We evaluated how decreased P2Y12 function influences platelet aggregate (thrombus) size measured ex vivo. Methods and results: We used confocal videomicroscopy to measure in real time the volume of platelet thrombi forming upon blood perfusion over fibrillar collagen type I at a wall shear rate of 1500 s^?1. The average volume was significantly smaller in 31 patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (19) or ticlopidine (12) than in 21 controls, but individual values were above the lower limit of the normal distribution, albeit mostly within the lower quartile, in 61.3% of cases. Disaggregation of platelet thrombi at later perfusion times occurred frequently in the patients. Vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, reflecting P2Y12 inhibition, was also decreased in the patient group, and only 22.6% of individual values were above the lower normal limit. We found no correlation between volume of thrombus formed on collagen fibrils and level of P2Y12 inhibition, suggesting that additional and individually variable factors can influence the inhibitory effect of treatment on platelet function. Conclusions: Measurements of platelet thrombus formation in flowing blood reflects the consequences of antiplatelet therapy in a manner that is not proportional to P2Y12 inhibition. Combining the results of the two assays may improve the assessment of thrombotic risk.     

Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: the emergency physician's perspective

The platelet plays a central role in the pathogenesis of coronary thrombosis after atherosclerotic plaque rupture, and its active inhibition forms a cornerstone of the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Early treatment with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone in reducing recurrent ischemic events in patients presenting with ACS, and is a useful adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention, especially with stenting. There is a potential for increased bleeding complications in patients on clopidogrel therapy who subsequently undergo urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Consequently, many emergency physicians withhold clopidogrel treatment until it is clear that urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery will not be required. The potential untoward effects seem to be minimized by withholding antiplatelet therapy 3-5 days before surgery. Intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors inhibitors are also particularly useful in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, and may have some utility in the medical management of patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS, starting in the emergency department. For patients presenting to the emergency department with ACS, the benefits and risks of initiating clopidogrel or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy need to be considered on an individual basis.     

急性冠脉综合征部分特殊人群抗血小板治疗研究进展

抗血小板治疗是急性冠脉综合征（acute coronary syndrome, ACS）患者治疗的基石,而阿司匹林联合一种P2Y12 受体抑制剂是目前指南的I类推荐。抗血小板治疗在降低ACS患者心血管主要不良事件的同时,也增加了其出血风险。因此,对于部分特殊人群如高龄、合并糖尿病、卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作（TIA）及接受溶栓的ST段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）患者,在评估缺血风险与出血风险的同时,其抗血小板治疗的方案呈现着巨大的个体差异,本文就目前部分特殊人群的抗血小板治疗的研究进展进行综述。     

Prasugrel

The antithrombotic therapy in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is subject of several new therapeutic approaches. Simultaneous treatment with aspirin and a thienopyridin (clopidogrel) represents the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome and following coronary stenting recommended by many guidelines. Without true evidence this drug combination is used for the prevention of arterial thrombosis in many other vascular interventions (e.g. carotid stenting, aortic stenting, peripherial arterial stents). The main problems of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel are the slow onset of action and the high interindividual variation in the degree of platelet inhibition. The thienopyridin prasugrel is a more potent platelet inhibitor with a more rapid onset of action and smaller interindividual variations in platelet inhibition. The therapeutic superiority of prasugrel with respect to coronary events and stent thromboses was proven in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary interventions. Specifically patients with Diabetes mellitus and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction seemed to benefit most due to the improved inhibition of platelet activity. A higher rate of bleeding complications was seen in those over the age of 75 years and a body weight below 60 kg for which a daily dose of 5mg/day was approved. Further clinical studies with prasugrel in patients with non-invasively treated acute coronary syndromes are ongoing.     

ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the role of adjunctive antiplatelet therapy

Antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risks of recurrent myocardial infarction and restenosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is critically important to optimize the early treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Traditionally, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; aspirin) has been recommended for patients with suspected STEMI, but this agent targets only one of several pathways of platelet aggregation. Antiplatelet agents with different inhibitory mechanisms may act synergistically with ASA. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are generally not used with fibrinolytic agents in acute STEMI management; indeed, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus bolus fibrinolytics increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Aggressive antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel reduces mortality in STEMI patients and offers significant clinical benefits, without an associated increase in major bleeding events. Recent trials support the development of an early and aggressive approach to more complete platelet inhibition using clopidogrel, in combination with ASA, for patients with STEMI.     

三联抗血小板药物对非ST段抬高性急性冠脉综合征患者血清炎症因子及内皮功能的影响

目的探讨短期三联抗血小板药物对非ST段抬高性急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者血清炎症因子和血管内皮功能的影响,为三联抗血小板药物治疗非ST段抬高性ACS提供进一步的临床依据。方法急性非ST段抬高性ACS患者82例,随机分为三联抗血小板药物治疗组(治疗组)和二联抗血小板治疗组(对照组);观察组患者给予阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、替罗非班三联抗血小板药物;对照组患者给予阿司匹林,氯吡格雷二联抗血小板药物。观察治疗48 h后患者血清炎症因子(hs-CRP、IL-6)及反映血管内皮功能的指标(ET-1、NO、PGI2)的水平变化情况。结果三联抗血小板药物较二联抗血小板药物更有效地降低非ST段抬高性ACS患者血清炎症因子及改善血管内皮功能,主要的不良反应为皮下瘀斑、牙龈出血。结论对于非ST段抬高性ACS患者,三联抗血小板药物在短期的抗炎、改善血管功能方面要优于二联抗血小板治疗,值得临床推广应用。     

A case–control study on platelet reactivity in patients with coronary stent thrombosis

Summary. Background: The pathophysiology of stent thrombosis (ST) has evolved from the identification of single causative factors to a complex multifactorial model. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients with a history of ST exhibit heightened platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and aspirin. Patients/methods: Pretreatment and on‐treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and aspirin, as well as dual antiplatelet therapy resistance, was determined in 84 patients with a history of definite ST (cases: 41 early ST; 43 late ST) and in 103 control patients with a previously implanted coronary stent but no ST after the index procedure. Platelet function was evaluated with optical aggregometry, the VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin assays, the PFA‐100 Innovance P2Y* cartridge, the flow cytometric vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein assay and urine 11‐dehydrothromboxane B₂ measurement before and after the administration of a 600‐mg loading dose of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01012544. Results: Patients with a history of early ST clearly demonstrated higher on‐clopidogrel platelet reactivity than controls. Patients with both early and late ST exhibited heightened on‐aspirin platelet reactivity status, and dual antiplatelet therapy resistance was more frequent. Conclusions: Patients with a history of early ST exhibit a poor response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, both early and late ST are strongly and independently associated with heightened on‐aspirin platelet reactivity, and dual antiplatelet therapy resistance is more frequent.     

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: Guidance for Nurse Practitioners

Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) is recommended after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to reduce the risk of secondary ischemic events. DAPT is recommended for at least 12 months after ACS, with prolonged DAPT suggested in patients with low bleeding risk. Nurse practitioners have an important role in managing patients after ACS, acting as patient advocates and collaborating with the cardiology provider to ensure adherence to DAPT. This review describes current recommendations for DAPT in patients with ACS and the nurse practitioners role in maximizing benefits of antiplatelet therapy.     

肠溶阿司匹林和氯吡格雷在抗血小板治疗中上消化道出血的相关危险因素分析

[目的]分析肠溶阿司匹林和氯吡格雷在抗血小板治疗中导致上消化道出血的相关危险因素.[方法]回顾性分析2009年2月至2013年5月冠状动脉硬化性心脏病患者98例的临床资料,其中58例患者采用肠溶阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗（观察组）;其余40例患者则单独采用肠溶阿司匹林或氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗（对照组）,比较两组患者的上消化道出血发生率并分析统计导致患者上消化道出血的相关危险因素.[结果]观察组上消化道出血发生率8.6％明显高于对照组2.5％（P＜0.05）;Logistic回归分析发现高龄（＞60岁）、服用时间超过3个月、有既往消化道出血病史和抗血小板药物联合使用是抗血小板治疗中增加上消化道出血的危险因素.[结论]抗血小板药物联合使用增加患者上消化道出血的几率,同时对高龄、服药时间较久及既往有上消化道出血史的患者应高度警惕上消化道出血的可能.