A prospective study of subclinical myocardial damage in endovascular versus open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is considered to be less invasive and better tolerated by the cardiovascular system than open repair. Our aim was to assess the true incidence of perioperative myocardial damage associated with endovascular vs open infrarenal AAA repair. METHODS: Between July 1999 and June 2001, preoperative and postoperative serum troponin T (TnT) levels were measured in all patients presenting for elective AAA repair at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. The incidence of myocardial damage was recorded on the basis of standard clinical, biochemical, and electrocardiographic changes or a subclinical increase of 50% or more in serum TnT. Patients were excluded if the TnT increase was associated with a significant increase of serum creatinine (> or =50%) with no other evidence of myocardial ischemia. The differences between the two groups were analyzed with the chi 2 test and odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 35 open and 112 endovascular AAA repairs were included in the study. There was no significant difference in age, sex, preoperative serum creatinine, or preoperative serum TnT between the two treatment groups. Seventeen patients had biochemical evidence of myocardial damage, which was clinically obvious in only one patient. Even though the incidence of previous myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients undergoing endovascular repair (41%) than open repair (22%; P < .05), the overall incidence of myocardial damage (clinical or subclinical) was significantly higher in the open group compared with the endovascular group (8 [25%] of 32 vs 9 [8%] of 109, respectively; odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-10.49; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: There is a previously underestimated incidence of subclinical myocardial damage associated with surgery for infrarenal AAA which is lower after endovascular than open repair.     

The influence of aneurysm size on perioperative cardiac outcome in elective open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size and growth has been found to be associated with local generation of inflammation markers such as interleukin-6. Inflammation also seems to be important in perioperative adverse cardiac events. We hypothesized that patients with a large AAA are at increased risk for cardiac events. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a computed tomography angiography scan before open elective infrarenal AAA repair between March 2000 and December 2005 at three hospitals were analyzed. All patients were screened for the clinical risk factors of age, gender, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, renal failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as for cardioprotective medication. Postoperative data on troponin release, creatine kinase/creatine kinase isoenzyme MB, and electrocardiogram were routinely collected on days 1, 3, 7, and 30. The main outcome measure was the combined end point of 30-day cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of AAA size on postoperative cardiac outcome. RESULTS: The study included 500 patients. Their mean age was 69.8 +/- 9.5 years, and 431 (86%) were men. Thirty-one patients (6.2%) had perioperative cardiovascular complications, consisting of 15 (3.0%) cardiovascular deaths and 16 (3.2%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions. After correction for other risk factors, including age, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, medication use, duration of surgery, and intraoperative blood loss, AAA size was independently associated with perioperative nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (3.2% increase in risk for each millimeter added, 95% confidence interval 1.1% to 6.2%, P = .007). CONCLUSION: A larger AAA size is independently associated with an increased incidence of perioperative cardiovascular complications after elective infrarenal AAA repair.     

Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses during endovascular and conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: To compare changes in plasma catecholamines, acid-base status and cardiovascular dynamics in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair under standard general anaesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. MATERIALS: 30 patients scheduled for elective infrarenal AAA repair. METHODS: Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations, acid-base status and cardiovascular measurement were compared before surgery, and 5 min after aortic clamping and clamp release (conventional group) or occlusion and release (endovascular group) in patients undergoing endovascular (n = 15) or conventional AAA repair (n = 15). RESULTS: Arterial pH (p < 0.005) and base deficit (p < 0.05) increased, and plasma bicarbonate decreased (p < 0.005) during aortic cross-clamping in the conventional group. pH decreased further (p < 0.005), and base deficit and pCO2 increased (both p < 0.005) after clamp release. These changes were significantly greater than during endovascular repair, in whom within-group changes were not statistically significant. Values were similar in the two groups 30 min after reperfusion. Plasma epinephrine concentrations increased during conventional surgery (p < 0.05) and were greater than in the endovascular group (p < 0.05). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations increased during surgery in both groups but the changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma catecholamine concentrations, changes in cardiovascular variables and acid-base status were increased during conventional compared with endovascular AAA repair.     

Preoperative cardiac assessment for patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a survey of current practice by vascular surgeons in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory

Background: The reported mortality rate following open elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) varies between 0 and 12%. Much of the mortality and major morbidity is caused by cardiac events. The evidence regarding best practice for cardiac assessment and optimization of this patient group is unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current practice of cardiac risk factor assessment by vas­cular surgeons in New South Wales (NSW) and Australian Capital Territory (ACT) for patients undergoing open elective repair of infrarenal AAA. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 46 surgeons in NSW and ACT identified as expressing a principal or major interest in vascular surgery. If no response was received within 3 weeks, a second questionnaire was sent and if no response was received after the second mailing, a telephone survey of non‐responders was conducted. Data were collated regarding the importance of risk factors elicited by clinical history, preoperative investigation, referral for cardiological opinion, use of perioperative beta‐blockade and the timing of aortic surgery in relation to coronary artery revascularization and acute myocardial infarction. Results: The overall response rate was 87% (40/46) and the median (range) response time was 14 (4?109) days. Only 22 of 40 and 23 of 40 surgeons consider diabetes mellitus or renal impairment, respectively, to be important when assessing cardiac risk and 34 of 40 surgeons do not employ a validated risk index in preoperative assessment. Sixteen of 40 surgeons refer all patients needing AAA repair to a cardiologist, while 24 of 40 would initiate cardiac investigations themselves (either stress electrocardiography, scintigraphy or echocardiography). Seventeen surgeons always or usually commenced perioperative beta‐blockade with wide variations in the commencement (1 to > 28 days preoperatively) and duration (< 1 week to > 28 days postoperatively) of treatment. The timing of AAA repair following coronary revascularization ranged from < 1 week to 6 months and delay in surgical repair of AAA following myocardial infarction ranged from < 1 week to > 6 months. Conclusion: Preoperative assessment of cardiac risk in patients for repair of AAA lacks consensus among vascular surgeons in NSW and ACT. The diversity of clinical practice may rest with the paucity of prospective trials published in the medical literature or the influence of local institutional facilities.     

Randomisierte Studienlage zur Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas

In four studies (EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE) on the treatment of asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients were randomly allocated to either endovascular or surgical treatment. Patients with an AAA ≥5 cm, physical fitness and anatomical suitability were included for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The EVAR procedure for AAA showed a lower risk of perioperative mortality but was associated with a higher cardiovascular and aneurysm-related complication rate. In mid-term and long-term follow-up there were no differences in survival after EVAR and open aortic repair (OAR). While OAR was associated with higher cardiovascular perioperative mortality, EVAR demonstrated higher mortality in the follow-up period due to cardiac and aneurysm-related complications. Both treatment options can therefore be considered as equal and can both be offered to patients. The EVAR procedure should be the first choice of treatment of AAA in physically fit patients with suitable anatomy and OAR should be preferred when EVAR does not seem to be technically feasible or for patients where lifelong surveillance is not possible. No significant differences were observed regarding quality of life, sexual dysfunction or costs of treatment.     

肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后并发症的防治

目的　总结肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后常见并发症的预防与处理。　方法对已施行腔内治疗的 71例肾下腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析 ,讨论常见并发症发生的原因、处理、结果及预后。　结果　 71例接受腔内治疗的肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤患者技术成功率1 0 0 % ,无中转开腹手术者。原发性内漏 8例 ,神经并发症合并急性血栓形成 1例。一过性缺血性肠炎 2例。无肾动脉梗死、肢体栓塞等并发症。平均随访时间 (2 6± 5)个月。围手术期病死率 1 3 % (1 /71 ) ,总病死率 4 2 % (3/ 71 )。死亡原因 2例为急性心肌梗死 ,1例为急性心功能衰竭。随访过程中发现 3例原发性内漏转为持续性内漏 ,另发现继发性内漏 4例。本组患者 1个月后内漏发生率 9 8%(7/ 71 )。 2例继发性Ⅰ型内漏随访中瘤体增大 ,1例进行二期腔内治疗。　结论　动脉瘤的腔内治疗具有创伤小、技术操作可行、效果肯定的优点 ,内漏血是该技术主要并发症。对漏血量及瘤体有增大趋势的内漏应积极处理     

Selective evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A 16-year experience.

Reduction of cardiac mortality associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains an important goal. Five hundred consecutive urgent or elective operations for infrarenal nonruptured AAA were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on preoperative cardiac status: group I (n = 260, 52%), no clinical or electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD); group II (n = 212, 42.2%), clinical or ECG evidence of CAD considered stable after further evaluation with studies such as dipyridamole-thallium scanning, echocardiography, or coronary arteriography; group III (n = 28, 5.6%), clinical or ECG evidence of CAD considered unstable after further evaluation. Group I had no further cardiac evaluation and groups I and II underwent AAA repair without invasive treatment of CAD. Group III underwent repair of cardiac disease before (n = 21) or coincident with (n = 7) AAA repair. In all instances, perioperative fluid volume management was based on left ventricular performance curves constructed before operation. The 30-day operative mortality rate for AAA repair in all 500 patients was 1.6% (n = 8). There was one (0.4%) cardiac-related operative death in group I, which was significantly less than the five (2.4%) in group II (p less than 0.02). Total mortality for the two groups were also significantly different, with one group I death (0.4%) and seven group II deaths (3.3%), (p less than 0.02). These data support the conclusions that (1) the leading cause of perioperative mortality in AAA repair is myocardial infarction, (2) correction of severe or unstable CAD before or coincident with AAA repair is effective in preventing operative mortality, (3) patients with known CAD should be investigated more thoroughly to identify those likely to develop perioperative myocardial ischemia so that their CAD can be corrected before AAA repair, and (4) patients with no clinical or ECG evidence of CAD rarely die of perioperative myocardial infarction, and thus selective evaluation of CAD based on clinical grounds in AAA patients is justified.     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

The prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and concomitant coronary artery disease

Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications such as cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an established, cost-effective technique for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This review will focus on the additional prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for perioperative and late prognosis in patients with AAA and CAD.     

Perioperative myocardial injury after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair predicts outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial injury, detected by rises in cardiac troponin I (TnI), is common and associated with decreased survival following open AAA surgery. We examined the relationship between perioperative myocardial injury and postoperative outcome. DESIGN: Observational Cohort Study. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients who underwent elective open AAA repair were screened for perioperative myocardial injury or infarction using serial TnI measurements (taken on days 1, 3, and 7), ECG and clinical assessment. The primary outcome was survival free of cardiac failure, or myocardial infarction (MI) at follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty (47%) of the 43 patients had a TnI elevation. Of these, 11 (26%) patients met the criteria for MI. At a mean (+/-SD) follow-up of 1.5+/-0.8 years, 12 (28%) subjects had experienced at least one endpoint event. Survival free of cardiac failure or MI was 55% in patients who had TnI rises compared to 87% in those without (P=0.02). Logistic regression revealed that TnI elevation was an independent predictor of outcome with an odds ratio of 5.4 (95% CI 1.2-2.4, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Perioperative myocardial injury after elective open AAA repair predicts outcome after surgery. Routine TnI measurement should be considered in all patients, especially in those with high cardiovascular risk.     

Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveThe Zenith Fenestrated Endovascular Graft (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) has expanded the anatomic eligibility of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Current data on ZFEN mainly consist of single-institution experiences and show conflicting results. Therefore, we compared perioperative outcomes after repair using ZFEN with open complex AAA repair and infrarenal EVAR in a nationwide multicenter registry.MethodsWe identified all patients undergoing elective AAA repair using ZFEN, open complex AAA repair, and standard infrarenal EVAR between 2012 and 2016 within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular module. Open complex AAA repairs were defined as those with a juxtarenal or suprarenal proximal AAA extent in combination with an aortic cross-clamping position that was above at least one renal artery. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality, defined as death within 30 days or within the index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative renal dysfunction (creatinine concentration increase of >2 mg/dL from preoperative value or new dialysis), occurrence of any complication, procedure times, blood transfusion rates, and length of stay. To account for baseline differences, we calculated propensity scores and employed inverse probability-weighted logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 6825 AAA repairs—220 ZFENs, 181 open complex AAA repairs, and 6424 infrarenal EVARs. Univariate analysis of ZFEN compared with open complex AAA repair demonstrated lower rates of perioperative mortality (1.8% vs 8.8%; P = .001), postoperative renal dysfunction (1.4% vs 7.7%; P = .002), and overall complications (11% vs 33%; P < .001). In addition, fewer patients undergoing ZFEN received blood transfusions (22% vs 73%; P < .001), and median length of stay was shorter (2 vs 7 days; P < .001). After adjustment, open complex AAA repair was associated with higher odds of perioperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-18), postoperative renal dysfunction (OR, 13; 95% CI, 3.6-49), and overall complication rates (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.3-7.5) compared with ZFEN. Compared with infrarenal EVAR, ZFEN presented comparable rates of perioperative mortality (1.8% vs 0.8%; P = .084), renal dysfunction (1.4% vs 0.7%; P = .19), and any complication (11% vs 7.7%; P = .09). Furthermore, after adjustment, there was no significant difference between the odds of perioperative mortality, postoperative renal dysfunction, or any complication between infrarenal EVAR and ZFEN.ConclusionsZFEN is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open complex AAA repair, and outcomes are comparable to those of infrarenal EVAR. Long-term durability of ZFEN compared with open complex AAA repair warrants future research.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: risk stratified outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The impact of co-morbid conditions on early and late clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was assessed in concurrent cohorts of patients stratified with respect to risk for intervention. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: As a minimally invasive strategy for the treatment of AAA, endovascular repair has been embraced with enthusiasm for all prospective patients who are suitable anatomical candidates because of the promise of achieving a durable result with a reduced risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: From April 1994 to March 2001, endovascular AAA repair was performed in 236 patients using commercially available systems. A subset of patients considered at increased risk for intervention (n = 123) were categorized, as such, based on a preexisting history of ischemic coronary artery disease, with documentation of myocardial infarction (60%) or congestive heart failure (35%), or due to the presence of chronic obstructive disease (21%), liver disease, or malignancy. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality (30-day) was 6.5% in the increased-risk patients as compared to 1.8% among those classified as low risk (P = NS). There was no difference between groups in age (74 +/- 9 years vs. 72 +/- 6 years; mean +/- SD), surgical time (235 +/- 95 minutes vs. 219 +/- 84 minutes), blood loss (457 +/- 432 mL vs. 351 +/- 273 mL), postoperative hospital stay (4.8 +/- 3.4 days vs. 4.0 +/- 3.9 days), or days in the ICU (1.3 +/- 1.8 days vs. 0.5 +/- 1.6 days). Patients at increased risk of intervention had larger aneurysms than low-risk patients (59 +/- 13 mm vs. 51 +/- 14 mm; P <.05). Stent grafts were successfully implanted in 116 (95%) increased-risk versus 107 (95%) low-risk patients (P = NS). Conversion rates to open operative repair were similar in increased-risk and low-risk groups at 3% and 5%, respectively. The initial endoleak rate was 22% versus 20%, based on the first CT performed (either at discharge or 1 month; P = NS). To date, increased-risk patients have been followed for 17.4 +/- 15 months and low-risk patients for 16.3 +/- 14 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis for cumulative patient survival demonstrated a reduced probability of survival among those patients initially classified as at increased risk for intervention (P <.05, Mantel-Cox test). Both cohorts had similar two-year primary and secondary clinical success rates of approximately 75% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early and late clinical outcomes are comparable after endovascular repair of AAA, regardless of risk-stratification. Notably, 2 years after endovascular repair, at least one in five patients was classified as a clinical failure. Given the need for close life-long surveillance and the continued uncertainty associated with clinical outcome, caution is dictated in advocating endovascular treatment for the patient who is otherwise considered an ideal candidate for standard open surgical repair.     

Current results of elective aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal and occlusive disease

Decisions to resect small aortic aneurysms or employ non-operative treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease must depend on current rather than historical surgical results. To assess current morbidity and mortality, we reviewed 200 consecutive aortic resections in two groups of patients treated from 1981 to 1989: those undergoing elective aortofemoral bypass for occlusive disease (AFB, no. 100) or resection of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA, no. 100). Indications for AFB included claudication (54%), rest pain (32%), and gangrene (13%). AAA size ranged from 3 to 14 cm (mean 6.5 +/- 2.4 cm); 45% presented with abdominal or back pain. Patients undergoing AFB were younger (AFB 61.5 +/- 10 years vs AAA 68.7 +/- 8.9 years) with a higher incidence of some atherosclerotic risk factors, diabetes mellitus 30% vs 10%, tobacco use 77% vs 49%, hyperlipidemia 21% vs 7%; p less than 0.001). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was more prevalent in AAA patients (49% vs 34%; p less than 0.001). Postoperative mortality was not different in occlusive or aneurysmal disease (3% AFB vs 2% AAA), nor was the occurrence of serious complications such as myocardial infarction (2% vs 1%) or pulmonary embolism (2% vs 3%). Improvements in patient selection, perioperative care and surgical technique have lowered the mortality of elective aortic surgery. Given the current standard of care, an aggressive approach to AAA even in high risk patients is appropriate. The low morbidity of AFB for occlusive disease mandates a critical appraisal of less effective nonoperative therapies.     

A combination of statins and beta-blockers is independently associated with a reduction in the incidence of perioperative mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the combined beneficial effect of statin and beta-blocker use on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (AAA). BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing elective AAA-surgery identified by clinical risk factors and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as being at high-risk often have considerable cardiac complication rate despite the use of beta-blockers. METHODS: We studied 570 patients (mean age 69+/-9 years, 486 males) who underwent AAA-surgery between 1991 and 2001 at the Erasmus MC. Patients were evaluated for clinical risk factors (age>70 years, histories of MI, angina, diabetes mellitus, stroke, renal failure, heart failure and pulmonary disease), DSE, statin and beta-blocker use. The main outcome was a composite of perioperative mortality and MI within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality or MI occurred in 51 (8.9%) patients. The incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly lower in statin users compared to nonusers (3.7% vs. 11.0%; crude odds ratio (OR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.74; p=0.01). After correcting for other covariates, the association between statin use and reduced incidence of the composite endpoint remained unchanged (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.70; p=0.01). Beta-blocker use was also associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoint (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.54). Patients using a combination of statins and beta-blockers appeared to be at lower risk for the composite endpoint across multiple cardiac risk strata; particularly patients with 3 or more risk factors experienced significantly lower perioperative events. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of statin and beta-blocker use in patients with AAA-surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative mortality and nonfatal MI particularly in patients at the highest risk.     

Predictors of Cardiac Morbidity And Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

The aim of this study was to determine predictors of cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. This was a retrospective cohort study that took place in a University-affiliated county hospital. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were collected from a consecutive series of patients who underwent repair of the thoracic aorta at our institution between 1998 and 2003. Perioperative complications and mortality were identified for each patient. Fifty-nine patients underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. The endografts were successfully deployed in 58 (98%) patients. Nine (15%) died perioperatively, 4 (7%) from cardiac causes. There were 12 (20%) perioperative cardiac events. A history of myocardial infarction (MI) was the only preoperative risk factor that was predictive of a cardiac event (p = 0.001). The cardiac event rate was 29% for patients who did not receive perioperative beta-blockade vs. 8% in patients who did (p = 0.04). Intraoperative predictors of MI were estimated blood loss (2480 cc vs. 680 cc, p = 0.01), intravenous (IV) fluids (2955 cc vs. 2010 cc, p =0.02), and length of operation (269 min vs. 178 min, p = 0.02). From these results we concluded that mortality associated with endovascular repair of thoracic aorta remains significant. Patients with a history of MI had a higher perioperative cardiac event rate. Intraoperative predictors of perioperative cardiac events included blood loss, IV fluid requirement, and length of operation. Perioperative beta-blockade is important in endovascular thoracic surgery as a protection against postoperative cardiac events. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, Carlsbad, CA, April 11-13, 2003.     

Factors affecting long-term mortality after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

HYPOTHESIS: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has made considerable advancements with respect to perioperative mortality. However, fewer data are available regarding factors affecting long-term mortality, including the impact of adverse perioperative cardiac events. Perioperative clinical cardiac risk factors are significant predictors of long-term mortality.Design, Setting, and PATIENTS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of 468 patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from June 3, 1996, to January 31, 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to identify statistically significant independent predictors of long-term survival (beyond 30 days and after discharge from the hospital). RESULTS: The mean age was 74 years, and 90% of the patients were male. Median follow-up was 2.57 years (interquartile range, 0.92-4.06 years). The leading cause of death was cardiac in nature. On multivariate analysis, the number of preoperative clinical cardiac risk factors (P < .001), spending 2 or more days in the intensive care unit (P < .001), and having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P < .001) were predictors of decreased long-term survival. Of note, having a perioperative non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was not predictive of decreased survival (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse cardiac events are the leading cause of long-term mortality following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Preoperative clinical cardiac risk factors are significant predictors of long-term mortality, as are a prolonged intensive care unit stay and a perioperative ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A perioperative non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not influence long-term outcome.     

腹主动脉瘤术后死亡与严重并发症分析

目的:分析腹主动脉瘤(AAA)围手术期死亡与严重并发症的发生情况与防治策略。方法:回顾分析2009年1月—2014年12月中南大学湘雅医院143例接受手术治疗的AAA患者临床资料。结果:全组围手术期(术后30 d内)死亡6例(4.2%),发生严重并发症20例(14.0%)。腔内修复术患者术后病死率低于开腹手术患者,但差异未达统计学意义(1.3%vs.7.5%,P0.05);腔内修复术患者严重并发症发生率明显低于开腹手术患者(6.6%vs.22.4%,P0.05),术前合并冠心病的患者术后心血管并发症的发生率明显高于非冠心病患者(9.1%vs.0.9%,P0.05),而术前合并高血压术后心血管并发症的发生率无明显增加(4.8%vs.2.5%,P0.05);术前合并其他系统基础疾病的患者例数较少,未作相关统计分析。结论:腔内修复术在降低AAA围手术期病死率与严重并发症发生率方面较开放手术有明显优势;对于术前合并冠心病的患者应积极采取预防措施预防与防止术后心血管并发症的发生。     

手术治疗腹主动脉瘤205例远期疗效分析

目的评价手术治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤的围手术期和远期效果。方法回顾性分析205例肾下型腹主动脉瘤切除术的临床资料,总结围手术期并发症和远期生存率,评价手术治疗腹主动脉瘤的安全性和远期疗效。结果30 d围手术期死亡率为1．0％;手术时间3-6 h,平均(3．8±1．4)h;ICU恢复时间中位数为16 h。围术期主要并发症包括心功能不全18例,呼吸功能不全10例,急性心肌梗塞2例,急性脑梗塞2例,急性肾功能衰竭4例;寿命表分析1、3、5年生存率分别为96．2％,83．1％,75．8％,随访中未发现与人工血管移植有关的死亡病例和并发症。结论手术仍是腹主动脉瘤的标准治疗方法。术前全身系统风险的评估和围手术期的谨慎管理在提高手术治疗效果中起重要作用。     

Sex differences in perioperative outcomes after complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveFemale sex is associated with worse outcomes after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, the impact of female sex on complex AAA repair is poorly characterized. Therefore, we compared outcomes between female and male patients after open and endovascular treatment of complex AAA.MethodsWe identified all patients who underwent complex aneurysm repair between 2011 and 2017 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular module. Complex repairs were defined as those for juxtarenal, pararenal, or suprarenal aneurysms. We compared rates of perioperative adverse events between female and male patients stratified by open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We calculated propensity scores and used inverse probability-weighted logistic regression to identify independent associations between female sex and our outcomes.ResultsWe identified 2270 complex aneurysm repairs, of which 1260 were EVARs (21.4% female) and 1010 were open repairs (30.7% female). After EVAR, female patients had higher rates of perioperative mortality (6.3% vs 2.4%; P = .001) and major complications (15.9% vs 7.6%; P < .001) compared with male patients. In contrast, after open repair, perioperative mortality was not significantly different (7.4% vs 5.6%; P = .3), and the rate of major complications was similar (29.4% vs 27.4%; P = .53) between female and male patients. Furthermore, even though perioperative mortality was significantly lower after EVAR compared with open repair for male patients (2.4% vs 5.6%; P = .001), this difference was not significant for women (6.3% vs 7.4%; P = .60). On multivariable analysis, female sex remained independently associated with higher perioperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.9; P = .007) and major complications (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.2; P = .002) in patients treated with EVAR but showed no significant association with mortality (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P = .69) or major complications (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5; P = .74) after open repair. However, the association of female sex with higher perioperative mortality in patients undergoing complex EVAR was attenuated when diameter was replaced with aortic size index in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-3.9; P = .091).ConclusionsFemale sex is associated with higher perioperative mortality and more major complications than for male patients after complex EVAR but not after complex open repair. Continuous efforts are warranted to improve the sex discrepancies in patients undergoing endovascular repair of complex AAA.     

肾动脉平面下腹主动脉瘤的外科治疗

目的：探讨肾动脉平面下腹主动脉瘤的外科治疗经验。方法：传统开放手术治疗27例中择期手术19例,动脉瘤破裂行急症手术8例;腔内手术治疗4例。结果：围手术期并发心力衰竭3例,呼吸衰竭8例,急性心肌梗死1例,急性肾功能衰竭4例,术后严重出血1例,死亡5例,余均治愈。结论：外科手术是治疗肾动脉平面下腹主动脉瘤的有效手段,而腔内治疗以其安全、微创、对人体内环境干扰小等优点将成为未来发展的趋势。