Knee rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and repair

Reprinted with permission from The American Journal of Sports Medicine 9:3 140-147, 1981. Presented at the Interim Conference of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, February 8, 1980, Atlanta, GA.Address correspondence to: Lonnie Paulos, MD, 2350 Auburn Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45219.The purpose of this paper is to present the specifics and rationale of our postoperative rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and compare it with an international survey of 50 knee experts. It is important to stress that what we present is opinion. This opinion, however, is based on principles, guidelines, and specifics which we believe are important.The early phases of our program are based upon time and control of forces, both of which are necessary for ligament healing. The classic parameters of return to play do not indicate healing of ligament tissue and must not be substituted for time restraints.After ACL repair and reconstruction, there are five phases of rehabilitation: maximum protection (12 weeks), moderate protection (24 weeks), minimum protection (48 weeks), return to activity (60 weeks), and activity and maintenance.The maximum protection phase consists of the early healing period and controlled motion period. The early healing period is governed by a principle which requires the absolute control of forces to prevent disruption of the suture line or attachment site. This time will vary according to the surgical technique. We do not allow motion during this period. During the controlled motion period, we allow motion but control external forces to protect ligament healing.The moderate protection phase consists of the crutch-weaning and walking periods. The major goal of the moderate protection phase is to prepare the patient for walking. The principles which govern Phase 2 are that walking activities create large anterior cruciate ligament forces and healing strength is still low. A balance of quadriceps and hamstring forces is necessary for proper knee kinematics. De-emphasis of quadriceps exercises and emphasis of hamstring muscles is appropriate; however, both muscle groups must be strengthened. The crutch-weaning period is designed to allow the gradual increase of motion and strength to sustain walking activities.A paradox of exercise exists for strength building. To push weight from 30 degrees of flexion into full extension will protect the patellofemoral joint but will create large forces on the ACL. Our compromise is to push low weight through a full range of motion. We begin full weightbearing no sooner than the 16th week.The final three phases of our program are designed to develop dynamic stability through strength, coordination, and endurance. Phase 3, the maximum protection phase, consists of the protected activity period from the 24th through the 36th week, and the light activity period from the 37th through the 48th week. Restrictions include no running, no jumping, and the use of a brace full-time. The light activity period allows further time to protect the slow healer. This may be shortened or lengthened, depending upon the patient's condition and goals.Phase 4, the return to activity phase, begins nine to 12 months after surgery. It consists of the advanced rehabilitation period and the running period. The advanced rehabilitation period is designed to achieve maximum strength and further enhance neuromuscular coordination and endurance. The running period begins when the operated leg has at least 75 percent of the strength and power of the normal leg.The activity and maintenance phase consists of the return to sport and maintenance periods. On return to sport, the patient must gradually resume full activity by advancing from skill drills. The maintenance program consists of triweekly strength-building sessions, brace protection during sporting, and avoidance of high-risk activities. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991; 13(2):60-70.     

Design and implementation of a neuromuscular training program following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Neuromuscular training programs are increasingly integrated into clinical practice for lower extremity rehabilitation. A few rehabilitation programs have been evaluated for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and for injury prevention, but there is limited scientific evidence of the effect of neuromuscular training following ACL reconstruction. Therefore, a neuromuscular training program was developed for patients after ACL reconstruction. The objective of the neuromuscular training was to improve the ability to generate a fast and optimal muscle firing pattern, to increase dynamic joint stability, and to relearn movement patterns and skills necessary during activities of daily living and sports activities. The main areas considered when designing the postoperative rehabilitation program after ACL reconstruction were: ACL graft healing and ACL strain values during exercises, proprioception and neuromuscular control, and clinical studies on the effect of neuromuscular training programs. The rehabilitation program consists of balance exercises, dynamic joint stability exercises, jump training/plyometric exercises, agility drills, and sport-specific exercise. The patients exercise 3 times a week for 6 months. The scientific and clinical evidence for the rehabilitation program are described and the main exercises in the program are outlined.     

Combined injuries of the medial collateral ligament and the anterior cruciate ligament

Aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effect of acute and late anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with a combined injury of the ACL and the medial collateral ligament (MCL). All MCL injuries were treated non-operatively. In 27 patients (group I) we performed early ACL reconstruction (within the first 3 weeks after injury). The postoperative rehabilitation protocol included brace treatment for all patients over a period of 6 weeks. In 37 patients we performed late ACL reconstruction (after a minimum of 10 weeks). In this group initial non-operative MCL treatment (6 weeks brace treatment) was followed by a period of accelerated rehabilitation. Patients with late ACL reconstruction had a lower rate of loss of motion after finishing the postoperative rehabilitation programme and a lower rate of re-arthroscopies for a loss of extension (group I: 4 patients, group II: 1 patient). The difference in the mean quadriceps muscle strength (group I: 83.3%, group II: 86.3%) was not statistically significant. After a mean interval of 22 months, we saw no difference in the frequency of anterior or medial instabilities or in the loss of motion. The Lysholm score was significantly better in the group with late ACL reconstruction (group I: 85.3, group II: 89.9). The position on the Tegner activity scale decreased in both groups, to 5.5 in group I (preoperatively: 6.0) and to 5.6 in group II (preoperatively: 5.9). With regard to the lower rate of motion complications in the early postoperative period, the lower rate of re-arthroscopies, and the significantly better results in the Lysholm score, we prefer late ACL reconstruction in the treatment of combined injuries of the ACL and the MCL.     

Current concepts in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament disruption

Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries has changed considerably in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the past and present treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruptions in athletic individuals. In addition, this paper will discuss current trends in rehabilitation, such as immediate motion, weight bearing, and close kinetic chain exercises, and provide the scientific rationale for these rehabilitation principles. The treatment of individuals who have suffered an ACL disruption has changed dramatically over the years. The treatment of ACL ruptures has made a full circle. The first reconstructive procedure described used a patellar tendon graft. Then primary ACL repairs were advocated. With the limited success of that procedure, the nonoperative treatment was popularized, with reconstruction performed only after the conservative program failed. With this treatment plan, clinicians noted early degenerative joint changes and an increase in meniscus tears in the ACL deficient knee. Thus, reconstructive surgery using a patellar tendon graft was again advocated. Today, the current trend in the treatment of ACL tears is an arthroscopically assisted procedure to reconstruct the ACL using a bone-tendon-bone graft, such as a patellar tendon. The surgery employs accurate graft placement, tensioning, and fixation, which allows the therapist the opportunity to utilize immediate motion and weight bearing, in addition to strengthening exercises. This paper attempts to explain the rehabilitation process following ACL reconstruction using current scientific and clinical research. The program is based on the anatomy, biomechanics, and healing process of the knee, joint, and ACL. The clinical implications of this paper are numerous. First, we believe the information will assist clinicians in developing their own programs. Second, the data will assist the reader in understanding the sequential healing process. Finally, this paper documents that immediate aggressive rehabilitation is not deleterious to the ACL graft, and early therapy improves the functional outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(6):279-293.     

The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anatomy is very significant if a reconstruction is attempted after its rupture. An anatomic study should have to address, its biomechanical properties, its kinematics, its position and anatomic correlation and its functional properties. In this review, an attempt is made to summarize the most recent and authoritative tendencies as far as the anatomy of the ACL, and its surgical application in its reconstruction are concerned. Also, it is significant to take into account the anatomy as far as the rehabilitation protocol is concerned. Separate placement in the femoral side is known to give better results from transtibial approach. The medial tibial eminence and the intermeniscal ligament may be used as landmarks to guide the correct tunnel placement in anatomic ACL reconstruction. The anatomic centrum of the ACL femoral footprint is 43 % of the proximal-to-distal length of lateral, femoral intercondylar notch wall and femoral socket radius plus 2.5 mm anterior to the posterior articular margin. Some important factors affecting the surgical outcome of ACL reconstruction include graft selection, tunnel placement, initial graft tension, graft fixation, graft tunnel motion and healing. The rehabilitation protocol should come in phases in order to increase range of motion, muscle strength and leg balance, it should protect the graft and weightbearing should come in stages. The cornerstones of such a protocol remain bracing, controlling edema, pain and range of motion. This should be useful and valuable information in achieving full range of motion and stability of the knee postoperatively. In the end, all these advancements will contribute to better patient outcome. Recommendations point toward further experimental work with in vivo and in vitro studies, in order to assist in the development of new surgical procedures that could possibly replicate more closely the natural ACL anatomy and prevent future knee pathology.     

Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs ligamentum patellae

In this study we have analyzed outcome during the early rehabilitation period phase following two different methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: ligamentum patellae (LP) and semitendonosus/gracilis tendon (SG) based reconstruction. This study included 40 patients treated by each method, examined 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Patients in the SG group showed significantly better Lysholm scores at 6 and 12 months, Tegner Activity Scale scores at 3 months, and pain profile assessments at 6 weeks and 3 months than those in the LP group. Significant differences were observed in LP group in range-of-motion at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Stability tests revealed no significant differences between patients in the two groups. SG-based reconstruction of the ACL thus demonstrated advantages over LP-based reconstruction regarding pain and function, while LP-based reconstruction was associated with an earlier return of motion.     

The early treatment of motion complications after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

The use of active and passive knee motion in the immediate postoperative period and a treatment plan for early postoperative limitations in knee motion has proven highly effective in restoring motion after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Of 207 knees, 189 (91%) regained a full range of motion of 0 degrees-135 degrees. The remaining 18 knees (9%) did not regain motion as rapidly as the others and were placed in an early postoperative phased treatment program. Six knees had serial extension casts, nine had early gentle manipulation under anesthesia, and three had arthroscopic lysis of intraarticular adhesions and scar tissue. Fourteen of these 18 knees regained a full range of knee motion. Two of the remaining four knees lacked 5 degrees of full extension, whereas the other two, in patients who had failed to follow medical advice and the rehabilitation program, had permanent and significant limitation of motion. The incidence of postoperative motion problems was related to the extent of the surgical procedure. The incidence was 4% in patients who had only ACL reconstruction, 10% in cases in which added lateral extraarticular procedure had been done, 12% where a meniscus repair had been done, and 23% where a medial collateral ligament repair was done.     

Update on accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed knee continues to be a topic of intense interest among surgeons and therapists. Since 1987, over 880 patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction using the central one-third of the bone patellar tendon bone graft have followed our accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Follow-up of the patients reveals early return to athletic activity and maintenance of long-term stability. Our 1987 accelerated rehabilitation program continues to be modified, with less constraints placed on the postoperative patient in our present rehabilitation protocol. These recent changes are once again prompted by noncompliant patients who, with close follow-up evaluation, continue to yield excellent results. Our present accelerated rehabilitation protocol is divided into four phases. The initial phase encompasses the preoperative period. The second phase involves the initial 2 weeks post ACL reconstruction. The third phase dates from 2-5 weeks postoperation, and the final phase (greater than 5 weeks) involves a safe return to athletic play. Our goal with the accelerated rehabilitation protocol remains to decrease postoperative complications without jeopardizing the long term stability of the ACL reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(6):303-308.     

Traditional versus Accelerated Rehabilitation following ACL Reconstruction: A One-Year Follow-Up

Postoperative rehabilitation programs are believed to influence clinical outcome. The purpose of this paper was to outline the evolution of postoperative rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Because of the controversy surrounding accelerated ACL rehabilitation and the concept of gaining terminal knee extension immediately following reconstruction, the authors felt justified in carrying out a retrospective comparison of traditional rehabilitation versus an accelerated approach. The objective variables under consideration included range of motion, isokinetic strength, and ligamentous stability. Results showed that active and passive range of motion, including hyperextension, returned more quickly and more fully in the accelerated group. Ligamentous stability was found to be equal to or better in the accelerated group despite a more aggressive rehabilitation approach. The results of this study indicated that an accelerated rehabilitation program following ACL reconstruction resulted in improved range of motion and strength gains without compromising stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(6):309-316.     

A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part I: continuous passive motion, early weight bearing, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common surgical knee procedure that requires intensive postoperative rehabilitation by the patient. A variety of randomized controlled trials have investigated aspects of ACL reconstruction rehabilitation. A systematic review of English language level 1 and 2 studies identified 54 appropriate randomized controlled trials of ACL rehabilitation. Topics discussed in this part of the article include continuous passive motion, early weight bearing in motion, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation.     

The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation

This review of the literature assessed what is known about the biomechanics of the normal anterior cruciate ligament during rehabilitation exercises, the biomechanical behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament graft during healing, and clinical studies of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. After anterior cruciate replacement, immobilization of the knee, or restricted motion without muscle contraction, leads to undesired outcomes for the ligamentous, articular, and muscular structures that surround the joint. It is clear that rehabilitation that incorporates early joint motion is beneficial for reducing pain, minimizing capsular contractions, decreasing scar formation that can limit joint motion, and is beneficial for articular cartilage. There is evidence derived from randomized controlled trials that immediately after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, weightbearing is possible without producing an increase of anterior knee laxity and is beneficial because it lowers the incidence of patellofemoral pain. Rehabilitation with a closed kinetic chain program results in anteroposterior knee laxity values that are closer to normal, and earlier return to normal daily activities, compared with rehabilitation with an open kinetic chain program. This review revealed that more randomized, controlled trials of rehabilitation are needed. These should include the clinicians' and patients' perspective of the outcome, and biomarkers of articular cartilage metabolism.     

Proposed practice guidelines for nonoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation of physically active individuals

Nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture has not been a successful option for those who participate in high-level physical activity. However, there are instances when patients may want to attempt to return to physically demanding activities with nonoperative rehabilitation for an ACL injury. The purpose of this commentary is to describe guidelines for nonoperative management of physically active individuals with ACL injuries who wish to return to preinjury levels of physical activity. The guidelines are based on the results of 2 clinical studies that improved the overall success of nonoperative management of physically active individuals with ACL ruptures. A decision-making process for selecting appropriate candidates for nonoperative management (rehabilitation candidates) is described. Individuals are classified as rehabilitation candidates if they have no concomitant ligament or mensical damage associated with the ACL injury, have a unilateral ACL injury, and meet all 4 of the following criteria: (1) timed hop test score of 80% or more of the uninjured limb, (2) Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 80% or more, (3) global rating of knee function of 60% or more, and (4) no more than 1 episode of giving way since the incident injury to the time of testing. Individuals meeting the criteria of a rehabilitation candidate undergo an intensive rehabilitation program before returning to high-level activity. The rehabilitation program consisting of lower extremity muscle strength training, cardiovascular endurance training, agility and sport-specific skill training, and a training program using balance perturbations is described.     

Biomechanics and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

For years, bioengineers and orthopaedic surgeons have applied the principles of mechanics to gain valuable information about the complex function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The results of these investigations have provided scientific data for surgeons to improve methods of ACL reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation. This review paper will present specific examples of how the field of biomechanics has impacted the evolution of ACL research. The anatomy and biomechanics of the ACL as well as the discovery of new tools in ACL-related biomechanical study are first introduced. Some important factors affecting the surgical outcome of ACL reconstruction, including graft selection, tunnel placement, initial graft tension, graft fixation, graft tunnel motion and healing, are then discussed. The scientific basis for the new surgical procedure, i.e., anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction, designed to regain rotatory stability of the knee, is presented. To conclude, the future role of biomechanics in gaining valuable in-vivo data that can further advance the understanding of the ACL and ACL graft function in order to improve the patient outcome following ACL reconstruction is suggested.     

Nachbehandlung nach vorderem Kreuzbandersatz

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common orthopedic operation. The success of the operation depends on a large number of different factors. In addition to a lively discussion on single and double bundle reconstructions or anatomical and non-anatomical placement of the drill canal there is considerable disagreement on the follow-up treatment after ACL reconstruction. This article deals with the course of healing after an operation as well as the various rehabilitation phases and their specific characteristics. The question of orthotic devices, exercise with continuous passive motion tracks and criteria for the return to sport activities will be dealt with on the basis of the current literature.     

Early application of negative work via eccentric ergometry following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVES: To present a progressively increasing negative-work exercise program via eccentric ergometry early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and to suggest the potential of negative work to amplify the return of quadriceps size and strength. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 26-year-old highly active recreational athlete who sustained an ACL tear while skiing in January 2004 and then again while skiing in February 2005. This individual underwent an arthroscopically assisted ACL-R with a double-loop semitendinosusgracilis autograft initially, then a patellar tendon autograft following his ACL graft rupture. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, a progressive negative-work exercise program was initiated using an eccentric ergometer. The patient completed 31 training sessions of 5 to 30 minutes in duration over a 12-week period following the ACL-R and 33 training sessions of the same frequency and duration following the ACL revision. OUTCOMES: Following ACL-R, quadriceps volume increased 28% (involved lower extremity) and 14% (uninvolved lower extremity) during the 12-week training program. Following revision, quadriceps volume returned to similar levels at the same postoperative period as those achieved after the initial surgery (2% less on the involved side and 2% greater on the uninvolved side). Quadriceps strength, 15 weeks after ACL-R, exceeded preoperative measures by an average of 20% (involved) and 14% (uninvolved). Quadriceps strength after ACL revision exceeded all previous measures. DISCUSSION: This case report suggests that if gradually and progressively applied, negative work via eccentric ergometry can be both safe and efficacious early after ACL-R. Eccentric exercise may mitigate the prevalent muscle size and strength deficits commonly observed after ACL-R. The results of this case suggest a need for continued research with early negative work interventions following ACL-R.     

Principles of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation

It is known that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction needs to be combined with detailed postoperative rehabilitation in order for patients to return to their pre-injury activity levels, and that the rehabilitation process is as important as the reconstruction surgery. Literature studies focus on how early in the postoperative ACL rehabilitation period rehabilitation modalities can be initiated. Despite the sheer number of studies on this topic, postoperative ACL rehabilitation protocols have not been standardized yet. Could common, “ossified” knowledge or modalities really prove themselves in the literature? Could questions such as “is postoperative brace use really necessary?”, “what are the benefits of early restoration of the range of motion (ROM)?”, “to what extent is neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) effective in the protection from muscular atrophy?”, “how early can proprioception training and open chain exercises begin?”, “should strengthening training start in the immediate postoperative period?” be answered for sure? My aim is to review postoperative brace use, early ROM restoration, NMES, proprioception, open/closed chain exercises and early strengthening, which are common modalities in the very comprehensive theme of postoperative ACL rehabilitation, on the basis of several studies (Level of Evidence 1 and 2) and to present the commonly accepted ways they are presently used. Moreover, I have presented the objectives of postoperative ACL rehabilitation in tables and recent miscellaneous studies in the last chapter of the paper.     

Is bone tunnel osseointegration in hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction important?

A 27-year-old man underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring autograft with femoral and tibial interference screw fixation. Four weeks after surgery, he developed a discharging hematoma through the graft harvest-tibial tunnel incision, which persisted. The patient required further surgical intervention 7 weeks after the initial surgery. The wound was debrided, the tibial interference screw was removed, and the tibial tunnel was completely cleared of graft remnants. Arthroscopy of the knee was performed, in which the ACL graft appeared healthy and viable. No evidence of intra-articular sepsis was found. Postoperatively, the rehabilitation program was uneventful and, at 36 months, the patient has unrestricted activity and no clinical evidence of excessive ACL laxity. This case supports the importance of marginal articular surface healing of the ACL graft, suggesting that tibial intratunnel healing becomes redundant.     

Physical therapy and rehabilitation in chondral lesions

Although most patients with articular cartilage defects are asymptomatic, some may have symptoms such as pain, effusion, muscle weakness, and limited range of motion. The goals of rehabilitation in chondral lesions are to relieve clinical symptoms, obtain painless full range of motion and muscle strength, and improve function. The key point in the rehabilitation program is to improve sensorimotor function and decrease pain and disability without increasing cartilage degeneration. Basic principles in the postoperative rehabilitation period are the same as those in conservative treatment. However, the rehabilitation program should be modified depending on the surgical procedure. Each phase of the rehabilitation program should be designed considering the type of surgical procedure, estimated healing time, restoration of joint mobility and muscle strength, and the extent of pain and effusion. Exposing the healing cartilage to shear stress under compression may have adverse effects on the healing process. For this reason, the early stage of rehabilitation (0-6 weeks) is comprised of passive, active-assistive and non-weight bearing range of motion exercises. Postoperative weight-bearing depends on the size, nature, and location of the lesion and the surgical procedure. Restriction in weight bearing is recommended in all treatment procedures except for cartilage debridement. For a successful outcome, open communication should exist between the rehabilitation team and the surgeon and the rehabilitation program should be individualized.     

Decreased range of motion following acute versus chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Eighty patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were compared to 80 patients with chronic ACL reconstruction. Before reconstruction, all patients had 0 degrees-120 degrees active motion, performed a straight leg raise without loss of extension, and demonstrated good quadriceps control. At 3 months, 4 acute patients had decreased range of motion (<10 degrees-120 degrees), but none at 6 or 12 months, and did not require repeat surgery. One chronic patient had decreased range of motion at 3 and 6 months and 1 patient had decreased range of motion at 1 year; both patients required operative intervention. Using these specific preoperative criteria, no increased incidence of decreased range of motion was found when an ACL reconstruction was performed within 3 weeks of injury.     

ACL injuries and stem cell therapy

Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are very frequent injuries, particularly in young and active people. Arthroscopic reconstruction using tendon auto- or allograft represents the gold-standard for the management of ACL tears. Interestingly, the ACL has the potential to heal upon intensive non-surgical rehabilitation procedures. Several biological factors influence this healing process as local intraligamentous cytokines and mainly cell repair mechanisms controlled by stem cells or progenitor cells. Understanding the mechanisms of this regeneration process and the cells involved may pave the way for novel, less invasive and biology-based strategies for ACL repair. This review aims to focus on the current knowledge on the mechanisms of ACL healing, the nature and potential of ligament derived stem/progenitor cells as well as on the potential and the limitations of using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treating injured ACL.