B-CHOP与CHOP方案对老年复发性套细胞淋巴瘤患者的疗效比较

目的 对比硼替佐米联合CHOP（B-CHOP）方案和CHOP方案对老年复发性套细胞淋巴瘤患者的疗效。方法 收集2009年1月至2015年1月老年复发性套细胞淋巴瘤患者38例,随机分为试验组（B-CHOP方案）和对照组（CHOP方案）,每组各19例。试验组采用B-CHOP方案治疗：硼替佐米1.6 mg／m2静推,第1、8天;环磷酰胺750 mg／m2静滴,第2天;阿霉素50 mg／m2静滴,第2天;长春新碱 1.4 mg／m2（最大剂量为2 mg）静滴,第2天;强的松100 mg／天口服,第2～6天。对照组采用CHOP方案：环磷酰胺750 mg／m2静滴,第1天;阿霉素50 mg／m2静滴,第1天;长春新碱 1.4 mg／m2（最大剂量为2 mg）静滴,第1天;强的松100 mg／天口服,第1～5天。两组均以28天为1周期,共化疗8个周期。分别于第4、8个周期化疗完成后采用非霍奇金淋巴瘤国际疗效判断标准进行评价,根据随访资料分析远期生存情况。结果 试验组化疗4个周期后获完全缓解（CR）10例、部分缓解（PR）4例、无反应（NR）3例、进展（PD）2例,8个周期后获CR 12例、PR 4例、NR 1例、PD 2例;对照组化疗4个周期后获CR 3例、PR 2例、NR 10例、PD 4例,8个周期后获CR 5例、PR 3例、NR 7例、PD 4例。试验组第4、8个周期化疗完成后的有效率（RR）为73.7％和84.2％,均高于对照组的26.3％和42.1％,差异有统计学有意义（P＜0.05）。试验组的中位总生存时间为56.0个月,高于对照组的29.0个月（P＜0.05）。两组主要不良反应为发热、白细胞减少、血小板减少和周围神经炎等,且两组不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 在改善老年复发性套细胞淋巴瘤患者的RR和OS方面,B-CHOP方案明显优于CHOP方案。     

BACOD方案治疗复发及难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床研究

 目的　观察BACOD方案治疗复发及难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）的疗效及患者不良反应。方法　65例复发及难治性NHL患者,采用BACOD方案进行化疗,具体为：博莱霉素10 mg／m2,静脉滴注,第2、9天;环磷酰胺750 mg／m2,静脉滴注,第1天;长春地辛3 mg／m2,静脉注射,第1、8天;阿糖胞苷150 mg／m2,静脉滴注,第2天至第5天;地塞米松10 mg／m2,静脉滴注,第1天至第7天,3周为1个疗程。结果　完全缓解18例,部分缓解30例,稳定13例,进展4例,有效率70.8 %。有效患者中位缓解时间 10个月（2～35个月）。1年生存率32.3 %,2年生存率24.6 %。患者主要不良反应为骨髓抑制。结论　BACOD方案可作为复发及难治性NHL的解救方案。     

Treatment of diffuse histiocytic lymphoma (DHL) with COMLA (cyclophosphamide, oncovin, methotrexate, leucovorin, cytosine arabinoside): a 10-year experience in a single institution

Between March 1974 and December 1983, 83 patients with diffuse histiocytic lymphoma (DHL) were treated with COMLA (cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2 day 1; Oncovin (Lilly, Indianapolis) 1.4 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15; and cytosine arabinoside 300 mg/m2 and methotrexate 120 mg/m2 days 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, and 71; and leucovorin 25 mg/m2 every six hours X 4, beginning 24 hours after methotrexate). For the purpose of analysis, patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 54) included patients age 65 or under who had received no prior curative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Group 2 (n = 29) included all patients over age 65 and patients who had received prior curative radiation therapy or prior minimal chemotherapy. The median time of follow-up for all patients was 28 months. Group 1 included 11 stage II, ten stage III, and 33 stage IV patients. Of 48 evaluable patients in this group, 21 (44%) achieved a complete remission (CR), eight (17%) achieved a partial remission (PR), and 19 (40%) showed no response (NR). Median survival of CR patients was 114+ months, PR patients, 42 months, and NR patients, 13 months. Six CR patients relapsed. The median disease-free survival of CR patients was 108+ months. Group 2 included nine stage II, seven stage III, and 13 stage IV patients. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, eight (33%) achieved a CR, six (25%) achieved a PR, and ten (42%) showed no response. The median survival of CR patients was 114+ months, that of PR patients was 17 months, and that of NR patients, 9 months. Two CR patients relapsed. The median disease-free survival of CR patients had not been reached at 102 months. The regimen was well tolerated in most patients and toxicity was acceptable. We conclude that COMLA is a well tolerated outpatient chemotherapy regimen capable of inducing durable CRs in some patients with DHL. Results achieved with COMLA, however, are inferior to those of more aggressive treatment programs; thus, the use of COMLA as first-line therapy in DHL should be limited to those patients unable to tolerate a more aggressive treatment program.     

氟达拉滨联合方案治疗复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床疗效观察

目的观察氟达拉滨联合化疗治疗复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床疗效及安全性。方法38例复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者均采用FND方案：氟达拉滨30mg/m² d1~3,米托蒽醌10mg/m² d1,曲安西龙80mg pod 1~5, 28天一周期。结果全组患者CR 8例（21%）,PR 13例（34%）,有效率56%;其中20例复发难治惰性淋巴瘤患者CR7例（35%）,PR9例（45%）,有效率80%; 18例复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者CR 1例（6%）,PR 4例（22%）,有效率28%（ χ²=10.45, P =0.001）。全组患者中位随访22（1~47）月,复发难治惰性淋巴瘤患者中位生存期45（2~47）月,中位无进展生存期18（2~34）月;复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中位生存期15（2~45）月,中位无进展生存期3（1~22）月。不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和肺感染。结论氟达拉滨联合方案治疗惰性淋巴瘤疗效肯定,对复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者疗效尚可,不失为一种治疗选择。     

两种不同方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较(英文)

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the recent efficacy and toxicity of a three-drug platinum-based regimen (A regimen): [cisplatin (DDP) + gemcitabine (GEM) + vinorelbine (NVB)] and a two-drug combination without a platinum drug (B regimen): GEM + NVB, which were used to treat 55 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, in a bid to provide a guidance for clinical treatment. Methods: Twenty-four cases of advanced NSCLC (stage III-IV) patients were treated with A regimen ...     

Long-Term Results in Multiple Myeloma After High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Transplantation According to Response Categories in the Era of Old Drugs

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the long-term prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) and the quality of response to therapy in a cohort of 173 patients treated with high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous transplantation in the era of old drugs.Patients and MethodsA total of 173 patients with de novo MM who received a transplant between 1994 and 2010 were analyzed. VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], dexamethasone) was used as front-line regimen before auto-HPCT. The conditioning was HDM 200 mg/m². Patients were evaluated for clinical response using the criteria from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, modified to include near complete remission (nCR) and very good partial remission (VGPR).ResultsThe response distribution after transplantation in our series was complete remission (CR) in 33 cases (19%), nearly complete remission (nCR) in 38 cases (22%), VGPR in 30 cases (17%), partial remission (PR) in 65 cases (38%), and stable disease (SD) in 7 cases (4%). Patients were followed for 48 ± 36 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for the CR group. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 122 months for CR, 55 months for nCR, 56 months for VGPR, 32 months for PR, and 22 months for SD. Significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the CR and nCR groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively), between the CR and VGPR groups (P = .002 and P = .001, respectively), and between the CR and PR groups (P = .000 and P = .001, respectively). Responses were clustered in 3 main categories, ie, CR, nCR + VGPR + PR, and SD. The respective 10-year PFS and OS values were 58% and 70% for CR, 15% and 18% for nCR + VGPR + PR, and 0% and 0% for SD.ConclusionThe achievement of depth and prolonged response represents the most important prognostic factor. The relapse rate is low for patients in CR after 10 years of follow-up, possibly signifying a cure.     

Low-dose mitomycin and weekly low-dose doxorubicin combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma previously treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil

Forty-four evaluable patients with breast carcinoma previously treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) were treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of doxorubicin (A) (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated every 28 days) and mitomycin (MIT) (10 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 28 days). Five patients (11%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 14 patients (32%) had a partial response (PR). The median duration of survival was 11.5 months and the median duration of response was 8 months for responders (CR and PR). Toxicity was moderate and consisted of neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (25%), pneumonitis (11%), and cardiomyopathy (2%). The combination chemotherapy regimen A and MIT is an effective regimen for treating previously treated with CMF.     

晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤115例临床疗效总结与预后分析

目的了解晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗效果及影响预后的因素。方法对1999年2月至2011年2月间初治的115例晚期（Ⅲ/Ⅳ期）霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的近期疗效、远期生存及预后因素进行了回顾性总结与分析。结果治疗后完全缓解80.0%（92/115）,部分缓解13.9%（16/115）,进展6.1%（7/115）。治疗后5年、10年无失败生存与总生存分别为72.2%、68.5%与83.5%、80.9%。单因素分析显示年龄≥45岁,血清β2微球蛋白升高,使用MOPP样化疗方案及化疗未达完全缓解为无失败生存及总生存不良预后因素。此外,血清乳酸脱氢酶升高及国际预后评分≥4分也是总生存不良预后因素。化疗后部分缓解者补充放疗可显著改善无失败生存。多因素分析显示,化疗后未达完全缓解是无失败生存及总生存的独立预后因素。结论本组晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤10年无失败生存与总生存达68.5%与80.9%。预后分析显示,化疗未达完全缓解是影响生存的独立预后因素。     

Survival Benefit and Efficiency of Low Dose Decitabine With CEG Regimen Compared to Decitabine Alone in the Elderly MDS – A Multicenter,Retrospective Study

BackgroundDecitabine are used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but none trials reported overall survival improvement.MethodsHigh-risk MDS and MDS transformed AML (sAML) patients (IPSS-R > 4.5, age above 60 years) in 6 medical centers of China were treated and compared a new regimen (decitabine with CEG) consisted of low dose decitabine (15 mg/m², days 1-3), low dose etoposide (30 mg/m², days 4,6,8,10,12), cytarabine (10 mg/m² per day, days 4-12) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 5ug/kg, adjusted by patients’ WBC level, 12 hours prior to decitabine administration) with decitabine alone. The endpoints were death and disease progression.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of these 2 groups were equivalent and none patients received prior chemotherapy. The treatment response rate (P= .048) and progression free survival (PFS, P = .030) all demonstrated significant improvement compared with decitabine alone. Decitabine with CEG regimen had attained a CR rate of 45.7%, a median OS of 36 (19-53) months and a median PFS of 34 (16.7-51.3) months in high-risk MDS patients, a CR rate of 40% in sAML. While decitabine alone only attained a median OS of 26 (24.5-27.5) months and a CR rate of 18.2% as well as a median progression free survival of 20 (17.6-22.4) months in MDS patients. Treatment response to CR or PR and TP53 mutation were 2 prognostic factor for OS and PFS in decitabine with CEG regimen.ConclusionDecitabine with CEG regimen showed some promising advantage in elderly, high-risk MDS.     

Oral cyclophosphamide therapy for patients with residual or relapsed indolent-type lymphoma after initial treatment for aggressive lymphomas. A sub-group of patients with apparent transformed indolent lymphoma

Lymph node or bone marrow biopsy from sixty-one patients affected by aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) were retrospectively evaluated to assess the histology at relapse. Eighteen cases (29.5%) were proven to have relapsed or persistent low-grade lymphoma after conventional therapy. In 5/18 patients association of low and high-grade lymphoma was detectable at diagnosis by bone marrow biopsy. In the remaining 13/18 no evidence of follicular lymphoma was detected at diagnosis. The outcome of these patients was compared to that of 43 patients relapsed without change in histology and treated by a second line therapy. Of these 43 patients, 13 were not responders (NR), 10 achieved a partial remission (PR) and 18 complete remission (CR). Two were lost during follow-up. The 18 patients with residual/relapsed indolent subtype received oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg/day for 15 days every month for six months): 3 of them had NR, 5 CR, and 10 PR. The overall survival (OS) median time was 39 months in low-grade resistant/relapsed patients and 20 months in patients with aggressive histology. OS at 24 months was 71 and 41%, respectively, (p < 0.02). Most of the patients with high-grade disease were refractory or relapsed after a median of five months, whereas cases with low-grade NHL showed a long lasting stable PR. We suggest that the higher grade patients with residual or relapsed low grade lymphoma were, in fact, transformed low-grade at diagnosis and, after removing the more aggressive component by chemotherapy, it is possible to manage these patients by conventional therapy for indolent lymphomas.     

小剂量CHG预激方案治疗老年人急性髓系白血病的临床研究

 目的　探讨小剂量CHG预激方案[小剂量阿糖胞苷（Ara-C）、高三尖杉酯碱（HHT）联合粒细胞集落刺激因子（G-CSF）]对老年急性髓系白血病（AML）的治疗疗效和毒副作用。方法　选择 年龄＞60岁的AML初治患者共35例,采用CHG方案治疗：在化疗前12 h皮下注射粒细胞集落刺激因子（G-CSF）200 μg／m2后,应用14 d,HHT 1 mg／m2,第1天至第14天,1次／d;Ara-C 10 mg／m2,第1天至第14天,皮下注射,每12 h 1次。治疗过程中,WBC＞20×109／L时暂停使用G-CSF,但不停化疗,待WBC回落后再继续使用。对完全缓解（CR）者后期可选择不同方案交替巩固化疗。结果　第1个疗程后12例患者获得CR,15例获得部分缓解（PR）,8例未缓解（NR）。第2个疗程后,15例PR患者5例取得CR,8例NR患者有2例获得PR,总有效率83 %（29／35）。17例获得CR的患者中11例按计划巩固强化治疗未复发,生存期为12～34个月,中位生存18个月;6例复发,经过原方案诱导后1例CR、4例 PR、1例NR。CHG方案血液学毒性低,非血液学毒性不明显。结论　初治的老年AML患者采用小剂量CHG预激方案诱导缓解的疗效较好、不良反应可耐受。     

GEMOX方案联合重组人血管内皮抑素一线治疗晚期胆系肿瘤的初步观察

目的 观察吉西他滨（GEM）、奥沙利铂（OXA）联合重组人血管内皮抑素（恩度）一线治疗晚期胆系肿瘤（BTCs）的疗效及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月至2013年8月ⅣB期BTCs患者 48例,分为联合组（n=20）和单纯化疗组（n=28）。联合组：吉西他滨1000mg／m2静滴,d1、d8;奥沙利铂 100mg／m2 静滴 d2,3周为1周期;恩度 15mg 静滴 d1～d14,3周为1周期。单纯化疗组仅给予GEMOX方案化疗,剂量与使用方法同联合组。2个周期后按照RECIST11标准评价近期疗效,参考KPS变化评价生活质量（QoL）,根据NCI CTC30标准评价不良反应,并观察疾病进展时间（TTP）和总生存时间（OS）。结果 联合组获CR 1例、PR 3例、SD 12例、PD 4例,有效率（RR）为200％,疾病控制率（DCR）为80.0％;中位TTP为8.6个月,中位OS为14.0个月;QoL改善稳定率为80.0％。单纯化疗组获CR 1例、PR 5例、SD 15例、PD 7例,RR 为21.5％,DCR 为75.0％;中位TTP为 6.0个月,中位OS 为10.0个月; QoL改善稳定率为71.4％。两组中位TTP和OS的差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组最常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制,其他不良反应包括恶心呕吐、肝功能损害、外周神经炎、皮肤过敏反应等,以1～2级为主,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。化疗联合恩度组仅2例出现心电图T波改变,1例出现房性早搏,1例出现轻度血压升高。结论 GEMOX联合恩度方案一线治疗转移性BTCs疗效较好,可以改善或稳定QoL,延长生存时间,且耐受性较好,值得临床推广使用和进一步深入观察。     

化疗序贯自体造血干细胞移植治疗淋巴瘤的疗效评价及影响因素分析

目的:探讨化疗序贯自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)对淋巴瘤患者的疗效及影响因素.方法:回顾性分析2015年09月至2020年12月于我科接受大剂量化疗(HDC)序贯自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗的患者,并进行疗效及不良反应评价.结果:40例患者,其中非霍奇金淋巴瘤34例,霍奇金淋巴瘤6例;男性27例,女性13例,...     

异长春花碱加异环磷酰胺加顺铂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌

目的 评价异长春花碱加异环磷酰胺加顺铂（NIP）联合方案作为第一线化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌病人的疗效及毒副作用。方法 化疗方案包括异长春花碱25mg/m^2 20min静脉输注第1d和第8d,异环磷酰胺1．2g/m^2 3h静脉输注第1－3d,美司纳400mg-800mg于0、4、8h静脉推注第2－3d,顺铂25mg/m^2 2h静脉输注第1－3d。每3周重复疗程。结果 共54例病人进行本项研究。51例可评价疗效,54例可评价毒性反应。总缓解率为53％,3例（6％）完全缓解,24例（47％）部分缓解。16例（31％）肿瘤稳定,8例（16％）肿瘤发展。中位缓解期7个月,全组中位生存期10个月。本化疗方案的剂量限制毒性为骨髓抑制,其中72％的病人发生3－4度中性粒细胞下降。结论 NIP是治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌有效的联合化疗方案,毒性反应能够耐受,值得进一步研究。     

改良Hyper-CVAD/MA方案治疗儿童淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤的疗效观察

目的观察改良Hyper-CVAD/MA方案在儿童淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤（LBL）初始治疗中的临床疗效。方法总结改良Hyper-CVAD/MA方案（分为A方案和B方案）初始治疗11例儿童LBL患者的临床资料。结果11例患者共完成A方案41例次,B方案40例次,鞘内注射34例次。化疗相关不良反应主要为骨髓抑制100%（81/81）、胃肠道反应39.5%（32/81）、细菌感染33.3%（27/81）、肝损害14.8%（12/81）,均未影响化疗进程。1~2疗程化疗后完全缓解（CR）27.3%（3/11）,部分缓解（PR）45.4%（5/11）,疾病稳定（SD）27.3%（3/11）;3~4疗程后CR 72.7%（8/11）,PR 18.2%（2/11）,SD 9.1%（1/11）;6~8疗程后CR 81.8%（9/11）,PR 9.1%（1/11）,疾病进展（PD）9.1%（1/11）,总体缓解率为90.9%。中位随访时间19月,平均（23.6±15.4）月,无病生存9例,带瘤生存1例,死亡1例。结论改良Hyper-CVAD/MA方案初始治疗儿童LBL患者疗效满意,化疗相关不良反应易耐受。     

紫杉醇联合奈达铂治疗晚期食管癌的临床观察

目的:观察紫杉醇(PTX)联合奈达铂(NDP)治疗晚期食管癌的临床疗效和不良反应.方法:晚期食管癌患者51例,紫杉醇135-175mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天;奈达铂80-100mg/m2,加入生理盐水500ml中静滴2h,第2天;21天为1周期,连用2个周期后评价疗效.结果:全组50例可评价疗效,总有效率58.0%(29/50),完全缓解3例,部分缓解26例,中位生存期为9.8个月,中位疾病进展时间5.7个月, 中位缓解时间4.5个月.主要不良反应为骨髓抑制所致的血小板及白细胞减少,消化道反应轻,未发现肝肾功能损害.结论:紫杉醇联合奈达铂治疗晚期食管癌近期疗效高,安全性较好,患者可耐受,值得临床观察应用.     

Correlation of pretransplant and early post‐transplant response assessment with outcomes after reduced‐intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

Chemotherapy sensitivity, defined simply as at least a partial response to chemotherapy, is an important outcome predictor for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients undergoing reduced‐intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). The authors hypothesized that further differentiation of chemotherapy sensitivity by specific response, complete remission (CR) versus partial remission (PR) versus stable disease (SD) versus progression of disease (PD), correlates with post‐transplant outcomes.

METHODS:

The impact of pretransplant and early (28 days) post‐transplant disease response on transplant outcomes was analyzed in 63 NHL patients treated with reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT.

RESULTS:

The 3‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (median potential follow‐up after reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT = 58 months) for all patients was 37% and 47%, respectively. The 3‐year EFS based on pretransplant response was: CR = 50%; PR = 66%; SD = 18%; no patient with PD pretransplant reached 3‐year follow‐up. The 3‐year OS based on pretransplant response was: CR = 63%; PR = 69%; SD = 45%. The 3‐year EFS based on post‐transplant response was: CR = 57%; PR = 32%; SD = 33%; no patient with PD post‐transplant reached 3‐year follow‐up. The 3‐year OS based on post‐transplant response was: CR = 65%; PR = 43%; SD = 50%. In multivariate analyses, pretransplant response was the best predictor of EFS (P < .0001). Pretransplant response (P < .0001) and age (P = .0035) were jointly associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data suggest that NHL patients with pretransplant SD, generally considered inappropriate candidates, may benefit from reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT, and patients with pretransplant PD should only receive this therapy in clinical trials. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Mitomycin-C, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (L-FAM2) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study

Thirty previously untreated patients with advanced measurable gastric cancer were given a combination chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2, and leucovorin, 200 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3, mitomycin-C, 10 mg/m2 on day 1 (every other cycle) and adriamycin, 40 mg/m2 on day 2, repeated every 21 days. The overall response rate was 46% (14/30; 95% confidence limits: 28%-64%) including 4 patients with a complete remission. Eight patients progressed. Median duration of remission (CR+PR) was 10 months, with a median survival of 13, 8 and 4 months for CR+PR, NC and PD, respectively. Main toxicities were leukopenia (WHO grade III-IV in 36% of the patients) and alopecia. One patient died from myocardial infarction after an adriamycin cumulative dose of 480 mg/m2. No other treatment-related death occurred. L-FAM2 is an effective combination for advanced gastric carcinoma. Further studies based on the association of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in combination with other active drugs are warranted.     

ABVD方案治疗复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床分析

目的研究吡柔比星+博来霉素+长春新碱+氮烯咪胺(ABVD)方案挽救化疗复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2017年3月收治的无法接受强烈化疗或自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT),接受ABVD方案挽救化疗的复发/难治DLBCL患者35例。ABVD方案如下:吡柔比星25 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,博来霉素10 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,长春新碱1.4 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,氮烯咪胺375 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅。28天为1个周期,化疗6个周期。观察近期疗效、1年生存率、总生存时间(OS)和不良反应。结果随访截止于2019年3月,中位随访14.4个月。全组患者经ABVD方案挽救化疗后,获CR 8例、PR 17例、SD 6例、PD 4例;有效率(RR)为71.5%,疾病控制率(DCR)为88.6%。中位缓解持续时间为3.5个月(95%CI:3.13~3.87个月),1年生存率为45.7%,中位OS为13.0个月(95%CI:11.90~14.10个月)。25例国际预后指数(IPI)评分低中危组患者(0~2分)的RR、DCR、1年生存率、中位OS分别为84.0%、100.0%、60.0%和14.0个月(95%CI:12.71~15.30个月),均高于10例中高危组患者(3~4分)的40.0%、60.0%、10.0%和6.0个月(95%CI:3.65~8.35个月),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而不同CD5表达情况以及ABVD方案不同治疗线程的患者上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全组主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和消化道反应,发生率分别为61.8%(24/35)和14.3%(5/35),以1~2级为主。结论 ABVD方案对多次化疗、无法接受强烈化疗或ASCT的低中危型复发/难治DLBCL疗效可靠、耐受性好,值得进一步临床研究。