Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control.

Biliary laser lithotripsy was performed under direct visual control in 35 consecutive patients not amenable to routine endoscopy. The patients had 1-50 (median 1) bile duct stones with the greatest diameter of the largest stone being 9-42 mm (median 20 mm). Conventional endoscopic treatment had failed because of an inaccessible papilla (16 patients), biliary strictures (seven patients), and impaction or large size of calculi (12 patients). Twelve patients, depending on their anatomical condition, underwent peroral cholangioscopy by means of a mother-babyscope system. Percutaneous cholangioscopy was initially carried out in 23 patients, 7-20 days (median 10 days) after creation of a transhepatic fistula. Pulsed dye laser (32 patients) or alexandrite laser (three patients) lithotripsy was applied under an appropriate direct visual control in all cases. Complete stone disintegration succeeded in 33 of 35 patients. All resultant fragments passed the papilla within a mean number of 1.3 treatment sessions. Peroral cholangioscopic lithotripsy failed in two cases. One patient successfully underwent percutaneous laser treatment and the other patient was referred to surgery. Fever, temporary haemobilia, or a subcapsular liver haematoma were seen in a total of eight patients during establishment of the cutaneobiliary fistula. A 95 year old patient who had been admitted with septic cholangitis died because of cardiorespiratory failure 5 days after bile duct clearance. It is concluded that laser lithotripsy performed under a direct visual control is an effective and safe procedure for the non-surgical treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Ductal clearance can usually be achieved in a single treatment session when the papilla and the stones are accessible by the peroral route. Percutaneous cholangioscopic lithotripsy is more time consuming but highly effective even in patients with a difficult anatomy, bile duct strictures, or intrahepatic calculi. This approach should be limited, however, to cases not amenable to retrograde procedures because the creation of the cutaneobiliary fistula is not without risks.     

Pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed dye laser lithotripsy was tested in 25 consecutive patients in whom bile duct stones could not be extracted after endoscopic sphincterotomy. The patients had one to six (mean, 1.8) bile duct stones (diameter, 10-35 mm; mean, 18 mm) located in the common bile duct (18 cases), the intrahepatic bile ducts (6 cases), or in a long cystic duct stump (1 case). Different approaches were tested depending on the presence of a T tube and on the localization of the bile duct stones. When a T tube was present (7 cases), the lithotripsy was performed under direct vision using a choledochoscope inserted through the T-tube tract. In 18 patients without a T tube in place, the lithotripsy was performed under fluoroscopy using a retrograde approach in case of common bile duct stones (14 cases) or under choledochoscopy using a percutaneous transhepatic approach in case of intrahepatic bile duct stones (4 cases). Fragmentation of all the bile duct stones and a complete bile duct clearance were obtained in all 11 cases with procedures performed under direct vision as compared with only 5 of 14 cases with procedures under fluoroscopic control. Moreover, 6 of the 9 failures using the latter approach were offered another session using a choledochoscope inserted through a percutaneous transhepatic tract and were also successfully treated. No complication related to the laser beam was noted. It is concluded that pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones (that are unable to be removed by standard endoscopic techniques) is safe and efficacious provided that it is performed under direct vision. Technical refinements are needed before this procedure can be reliably performed under fluoroscopy.     

Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been used since the mid-1980s to fragment bile duct stones which cannot be removed endoscopically. Early machines required general anaesthesia and immersion in a waterbath. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of the third generation Storz Modulith SL20 lithotriptor in fragmenting bile duct stones that could not be cleared by mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Eighty three patients with retained bile duct stones were treated. All patients received intravenous benzodiazepine sedation and pethidine analgesia. Stones were targeted by fluoroscopy following injection of contrast via a nasobiliary drain or T tube. Residual fragments were cleared at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 69 (83%) patients and in 18 of 24 patients (75%) who required more than one ESWL treatment. Stone clearance was achieved in all nine patients (100%) with intrahepatic stones and also in nine patients (100%) referred following surgical exploration of the bile duct. Complications included six cases of cholangitis and one perinephric haematoma which resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Using the Storz Modulith, 83% of refractory bile duct calculi were cleared with a low rate of complications. These results confirm that ESWL is an excellent alternative to surgery in those patients in whom endoscopic techniques have failed.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones in cystic duct remnants and Mirizzi syndrome

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of bile duct calculi is established, there are few studies of the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct remnant stones and for Mirizzi syndrome. METHODS: Patients who required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones were identified in a cohort of 239 patients with bile duct stones treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy between January 1989 and December 2001 at a single institution. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone contact. OBSERVATIONS: Six women (age range 19-85 years) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones after failure of endoscopic treatment measures. Three of the patients presented with retained cystic duct remnant calculi (one also had Mirizzi syndrome type I), and 3 presented with Mirizzi syndrome type I. The stones were fragmented successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in all patients; the fragments were extracted endoscopically in 5 patients. Endoscopy plus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was definitive treatment for all patients except one who subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones in a cystic duct remnant and in Mirizzi syndrome can be successfully treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in conjunction with endoscopic measures. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is especially useful when surgery is contraindicated.     

Tonnenkonkremente – Besonderheiten beim Hochbetagten

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction are established therapeutic procedures for common bile duct stones. Various nonsurgical techniques are available to increase the success rate, especially in patients with giant stones; these include mechanical lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, intraductal lithotripsy, and percutaneous transhepatic procedures. Endoscopic intervention in the treatment of symptomatic common bile stones in elderly patients and especially in cases of giant bile duct stones is also safe and is not associated with a higher complication rate compared with the normal population.     

术中胆道镜联合液电碎石治疗难治性肝内胆管结石的评价

目的探讨术中胆道镜联合液电碎石治疗难治性肝内胆管结石的治疗策略和临床价值。方法11例难治性肝内胆管结石患者,术中经直视及胆道镜下对患者肝实质、肝内胆管及结石状况进行探查、评估。对拟保留肝叶内的胆管结石采用胆道镜下液电碎石、取石,一次无法取净的患者,二期经窦道胆道镜下液电碎石、取石。结果所有11例患者经术中或二期碎石,均取净结石,治疗成功率100％。手术顺利,术后无手术并发症。本组随访10例,失访1例,随访时间1～3年。3例停用熊去氧胆酸片1～2年后复发肝内胆管小结石,其余7例患者随访期间未见复发。结论术中胆道镜联合液电碎石在有效保证难治性肝内胆管结石治疗成功的同时,最大程度的保护了肝组织,降低了治疗难度及手术风险,减少了术后并发症的发生,提高了患者的生存质量。     

Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Mechanical lithotripsy is used to break large bile duct stones. This study investigated the predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and basket removal of stones. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed for stones of large size (>15 mm diameter) that precluded extraction intact. Success was defined as complete clearance of the duct. Various predictive factors, including size and number of stones, stone impaction, serum bilirubin, presence of cholangitis, and bile duct diameter were analyzed in relation to the success or failure of lithotripsy. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis, which was found in 401 patients. Of the latter patients, 87 had large stones that required mechanical lithotripsy. Lithotripsy was successful in 69 (79%) patients. Impaction of the stone(s) in the bile duct was the only significant factor that predicted failure of lithotripsy and consequent failure of bile duct clearance. Other factors, including stone size, were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical lithotripsy is successful in about 79% of patients with large bile duct stones. The only significant factor that predicts failure of mechanical lithotripsy is stone impaction in the bile duct.     

Extracorporeal piezoelectric and intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy in problematic bile duct calculi

More than 90% of all common bile duct stones are today extracted endoscopically after papillotomy with the Dormia basket in combination with the mechanical lithotripter. For patients with endoscopically unremovable stones, there are now new therapies as an alternative to surgical intervention. Ductal stones can either be fragmented by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or by peroral cholangioscopic guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The remaining fragments can then be easily extracted endoscopically. If the stone cannot be removed by using these new techniques, a palliative endoprosthesis can by implanted. We report on our experiences and results with the extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy and the intracorporeal electrohydraulic therapy in 44 patients with complicated bile duct stones. Applying extracorporeal shock wave therapy, treatment was successful in 75% of the patients with common bile duct stones, intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy was successful in 71%. By combination of both techniques, the calculi could be removed in 84% of those patients where before one of both therapies had failed. Finally, the rate of success in the above mentioned 44 patients was 93%. It could be shown by this investigation that both therapeutic methods complete each other in the treatment of the complicated common bile duct stones.     

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy and change of biliary manometry patterns.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) is used to remove bile duct stones. This work aims to evaluate the clinical usefulness of PTCSL and the reversibility of the terminal bile duct dysfunctions after PTCSL. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients who underwent PTCSL using mechanical and/or electrohydraulic lithotripsy over the past 10 years (20 patients with common bile duct stones and 10 with intrahepatic bile duct stones) were evaluated. Terminal bile ductal pressure was measured using the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) tube prior to and after lithotripsy by means of variable-load cholangiomanometry. RESULTS: Complete stone extraction was possible in 26 patients (86.7%). The other 4 patients had intrahepatic stones. Complications included 2 cases of hemobilia, one of pneumonia, and 3 of localized peritonitis. Of 26 patients without residual stones, only 4 patients had a linear pressure flow (P-F) pattern which indicates normal biliary tract function prior to lithotripsy. In 17 of 22 patients with other type P-F patterns, however, these types also changed to a linear pattern after complete removal of stones. The P-F pattern of the other 5 patients remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: PTCSL is a safe and efficient method treating biliary tract lesions while preserving the function of the sphincter of Oddi. The terminal biliary tract function normalized after stone removal. Thus, PTCSL was useful for patients with complicated bile duct stones not accessible to endoscopic retrograde management.     

纤维胆道镜下钬激光碎石及狭窄矫形治疗难取性胆管结石

目的 探讨纤维胆道镜下钬激光治疗胆管残余结石及肝内胆管膜性狭窄的临床效果。方法 经T管逆行胆管造影及纤维胆道镜诊疗后判定为疑难胆管残余结石12例，共有肝内外胆管残余结石29颗，其中3例合并肝内胆管严重膜性狭窄5处，均采用钬激光碎石及膜性狭窄切开矫形术。结果 12例疑难胆管残余结石均于纤维胆道镜下钬激光碎石并取净。5处肝内胆管膜性狭窄切开矫形成功。11例获得随访未见明显的症状及结石复发。结论 胆道镜下钬激光在液体环境中粉碎胆管结石及汽化切开胆管膜性狭窄的方法简便，效果确切，安全可靠。     

Treatment of cholecystolithiasis from the internal medicine viewpoint

There is no better treatment method for the cholecystolithiasis accompanied by symptoms than the cholecystectomy. In the so-called mute gall an expecting attitude is justified. During the last years for selected patients with gallstones and calculi in the common bile duct, respectively, non-surgical therapeutic methods were developed. So it is possible for carriers of gallstones with slight to moderate complaints to undergo a medicamentous trial of litholysis with chenodesoxycholic acid or ursodesoxycholic acid or above all with a combination of these two bile acids. X-ray-negative calculi of less than 1.5 cm with a functioning gallbladder are the prerequisite. The extracorporeal stoss-wave lithotripsy is a new interesting method as well as the percutaneous or retrograde instillation of methyl-butyl ether. In these cases we are at the beginning, the international development should be pursued with attention. In calculi of the bile duct apart from operative methods the papillotomy and the extraction of calculi more than stood the test. The stoss-wave lithotripsy in calculi of the bile duct, which are to be removed neither by instillation of solvents nor endoscopically is a way out of the difficulty in contrast to the operation. As it is evident from the demonstrated facts the cholecystectomy, as the Swiss surgeon Rewbridge remarked already over 50 years ago, is really not the last answer to the problems of the cholelithiasis. Today it is the point to use the method best suited for the patient.     

Endoscopy for bile duct stones

In the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and advanced non-invasive imaging studies, pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for bile duct stones should be reserved for selected patients. ERCP remains the therapy of choice for removal of bile duct stones in the post-cholecystectomy patient and in patients with intact gallbladders. Bile duct stones can be cleared in nearly all patients using endoscopic techniques of sphincterotomy and mechanical lithotripsy. Difficult or complex bile duct stones can be endoscopically removed in the majority of patients with additional techniques such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, intraductal lithotripsy and/or stent placement. In non-operative patients in whom stone clearance cannot be achieved, long-term stent placement is a potential option in patients who are not candidates for further therapy. Endoscopic therapy may be effective in selected patients with intrahepatic biliary stones.     

Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillotomy is successful in more than 95% of the cases of choledocholithiasis. For patients with difficult bile duct stones not responding to mechanical lithotripsy, different methods for stone fragmentation have been developed. AIM: To compare the results of laser lithotripsy with a stone-tissue recognizing system, when guided by fluoroscopy only or by cholangioscopy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002 we have treated 89 patients with difficult bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laser lithotripsy. Unsuccessful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic were also performed before laser in 35% and 26% of the cases, respectively. RESULTS: Laser was effective in 79.2% of 72 patients guided by cholangioscopy and in 82.4% of 17 cases steered by fluoroscopy. The median number of impulses in the latter was 4,335 and 1,800 with the former technique. Two parameters influenced the manner of laser guidance. In cases of stones situated above a stricture, cholangioscopic control was more effective (64.7% vs. 31.9%). When the stones were in the distal bile duct, fluoroscopic control was more successful. CONCLUSION: In cases of difficult stones in the distal bile duct, laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic control is very effective and easily performed. Cholangioscopic guidance should be recommended just in cases of intrahepatic stones or in patients with stones situated proximal to a bile duct stenosis. In these cases, cholangioscopy should be performed either endoscopically or percutaneously.     

Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Common Bile Duct Stones: Experience in Four High-Risk Patients

Choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy was applied through a percutaneous transhepatic approach in four high-risk patients with common bile duct stones that were not extractable by duodenoscopic means. All stones were fragmented and removed from three patients, but one patient died from bronchopneumonia before ductal clearance could be achieved. The procedure was well tolerated, without any complication. The major disadvantage is the multiple maneuvers required and the prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy provides a safe and effective alternative for nonoperative treatment of common bile duct stones in high-risk patients when the duodenoscopic approach fails.     

Difficult bile duct stones

Opinion statement Bile duct stones are routinely removed at time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after biliary sphincterotomy with standard balloon or basket extraction techniques. However, in approximately 10% to 15% of patients, bile duct stones may be difficult to remove due to challenging access to the bile duct (periampullary diverticulum, Billroth II anatomy, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy), large (> 15 mm in diameter) bile duct stones, intrahepatic stones, or impacted stones in the bile duct or cystic duct. The initial approach to the removal of the difficult bile duct stone is to ensure adequate biliary sphincter orifice diameter with extension of biliary sphincterotomy or balloon dilation of the orifice. Mechanical lithotripsy is a readily available adjunct to standard stone extraction techniques and should be available in all ERCP units. If stone extraction fails with these maneuvers, two or more bile duct stents should be inserted, and ursodiol added to aid in duct decompression, stone fragmentation, and stone dissolution. Follow-up ERCP attempts to remove the difficult bile duct stones may be performed locally if expertise is available or alternatively referred to a tertiary center for advanced extracorporeal or intracorporeal fragmentation (mother-baby laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy) techniques. Nearly all patients with bile duct stones can be treated endoscopically if advanced techniques are utilized. For the rare patient who fails despite these efforts, surgical bile duct exploration, percutaneous approach to the bile duct, or long-term bile duct stenting should be discussed with the patient and family to identify the most appropriate therapeutic option. A thoughtful approach to each patient with difficult bile duct stones and a healthy awareness of the operator/endoscopy unit limitations is necessary to ensure the best patient outcomes. Consultation with a dedicated tertiary ERCP specialty center may be necessary.     

Successful shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones using ultrasound guidance

Eighteen patients with 41 gallstones in the common bile duct, common hepatic, cystic, and intrahepatic ducts underwent shock-wave lithotripsy using the electrohydraulic Sonolith 3000 lithotripter. Lithotripsy was performed using ultrasound guidance alone under intravenous analgesia/sedation. All patients previously had failed stone extraction via retrograde endoscopy, T-tube, or cholecystostomy., Lithotripsy was performed according to an FDA-approved protocol allowing a maximum of two 2500 shock-wave treatments at a 48 hr interval. Following the final lithotripsy or cholangiographic evidence of stone fragmentation, residual fragments were removed via endoscopic or percutaneous route within 24–72 hr. Ultrasound localization of gallstones was aided by continous infusion of the common bile duct with saline solution. In 15 of the 18 patients, complete fragmentation of the stones was accomplished, two had minimal fragmentation, and one with an encysted stone had no fracturing. No serious complications were encountered. Overall nonsurgical stone-free success rate was 17 of 18 patients, indicating biliary duct stones can be successfully treated using an ultrasound-guided lithotripter and intravenous sedation alone.     

Extracorporeal lithotripsy of bile duct stones using ultrasonography for stone localization

In 19 patients, extraction of bile duct stones through the papilla using a Dormia basket or a mechanical lithotripter was not possible following endoscopic sphincterotomy. After the insertion of a nasobiliary drain, extracorporeal lithotripsy was performed with intravenous sedation using an ultrasonographic stone localization system. The number and location of stones were first determined by retrograde cholangiography. At the time of lithotripsy, saline was injected in the bile ducts to modify the acoustic impedance of tissues surrounding the stones, and subsequent ultrasonography was effective in localizing all stones present in 4 of 5 (80%) patients with intrahepatic stones, and 13 of 14 (93%) with common bile duct stones. In 10 patients (53%), fragmentation was satisfactory and the bile ducts were cleared completely. The mean single stone diameter was significantly smaller in successful cases of fragmentation compared with failures (22.8 +/- 6.6 mm vs. 40 +/- 10 mm). The results in patients with multiple stones were significantly worse than those in patients with single stones of similar size (25% vs. 100% successful fragmentation). Reasons for this difference in results included the small size of the focal area and the reduced ability of ultrasonography (1) to adequately visualize multiple calculi individually and (2) to assess the degree of stone destruction. Care was taken to first await the resolution of infection or the correction of coagulation abnormalities when present; no morbidity following extracorporeal lithotripsy was observed. Despite its 3-step approach (endoscopic sphincterotomy, lithotripsy, and endoscopic extraction), the need for only intravenous sedation and the absence of patient immersion in water render this technique attractive for elderly and frail patients.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of bile duct stones resistant to endoscopic extraction

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones after sphincterotomy has a success rate of up to 95%. Failures occur in patients with extremely large stones, intrahepatic stones, and bile duct strictures. This study examined the efficacy and the safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a large cohort of patients in whom routine endoscopic measures including mechanical lithotripsy had failed to extract bile duct stones. METHODS: Out of 1587 consecutive patients, endoscopic stone extraction including mechanical lithotripsy was unsuccessful in 313 (20%). These 313 patients (64% women, median age, 73 years) underwent high-energy extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Stone targeting was performed fluoroscopically (99%) or by ultrasonography (1%). RESULTS: Complete clearance of bile duct calculi was achieved in 281 (90%) patients. In 80% of the patients, the fragments were extracted endoscopically after shock-wave therapy; spontaneous passage was observed in 10%. For patients with complete clearance compared with those without there were no differences with regard to size or number of the stones, intrahepatic or extrahepatic stone location, presence or absence of bile duct strictures, or type of lithotripter. Cholangitis (n = 4) and acute cholecystitis (n = 1) were the rare adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bile duct calculi that are difficult to extract endoscopically, high-energy extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective therapy regardless of stone size, stone location, or the presence of bile duct stricture.     

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gall stones--in vitro and animal studies.

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of human gall stones was investigated in vitro in a bath of saline and in a saline perfused bile duct. The technique was effective--only two stones could not be shattered. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy power requirement correlated with mechanical strength of stones, but not with biochemical composition. A trend toward higher power requirement was recorded with larger stones and stones over 2 cm in diameter could not be fragmented. Safety studies indicated that electrohydraulic lithotripsy was safe, provided the probe tip was not in contact with the bile duct wall. In vivo studies did not show any late effects after 10 days. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy is likely to be useful in the management of biliary calculi.     

Intrahepatic stones: the percutaneous approach.

Intrahepatic stones are prevalent in the Far East, whereas they are infrequently seen in Western countries. Hepatolithiasis can cause recurrent attacks of cholangitis, with a risk of liver abscesses, sepsis or hepatic failure. Immediate biliary decompression can usually be achieved by endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Definitive treatment should aim for complete elimination of bile stasis and removal of all stones. Hepatic resection promises the best long term results when the disease is limited to segments or the left liver lobe. Endoscopic retrograde choledochopancreatography is not well established for intrahepatic stones because of frequent failures due to associated biliary strictures, angulated ducts or peripherally impacted concrements. In contrast, percutaneous procedures can be easily performed through a T tube tract for residual stones after surgery. Establishment of a transhepatic fistula allows a targeted approach to liver segments with catheters or miniscopes, without the need for laparotomy. Biliary strictures can be dilated with balloons, and intrahepatic stones can be removed with baskets under fluoroscopic or cholangioscopic control. These techniques can be combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy for disintegration of impacted calculi. The risk of stone recurrence is particularly high in patients with associated biliary stenoses. Temporary or long term transhepatic intubation is a promising approach in these cases. The optimal management of intrahepatic stones remains a challenging task that requires an experienced team of gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists.