Efficacy and Safety of Niraparib as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC After First-Line Chemotherapy: A Randomized,Double-Blind,Phase 3 Study

IntroductionZL-2306-005 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, as first-line maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with platinum-responsive, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).MethodsPatients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to standardized, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo (300 mg [baseline body weight ≥ 77 kg, platelet count ≥ 150,000/μL] or 200 mg) once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review) and overall survival (sample size planned: 591 patients). Secondary end points included investigator-evaluated PFS and safety.ResultsZL-2306-005 was terminated early owing to ES-SCLC treatment landscape changes (data cutoff: March 20, 2020). During July 2018–February 2020, a total of 185 of 272 patients screened were randomized (niraparib: n = 125 [CR = 1, PR = 124]; placebo: n = 60 [CR = 1, PR = 59]). Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (blinded independent central review) was 1.54 months (1.41–2.69, niraparib) and 1.36 months (1.31–1.48, placebo); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46–0.95, p = 0.0242). Median overall survival was 9.92 months (9.33–13.54, niraparib) and 11.43 months (9.53–not estimable, placebo); HR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.62–1.73, p = 0.9052). Median investigator-evaluated PFS was 1.48 months (1.41–2.56, niraparib) and 1.41 months (1.31–2.00, placebo); HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.61–1.26; p = 0.4653). Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events occurred in 34.4% (niraparib) and 25.0% (placebo) of patients.ConclusionsZL-2306-005 did not reach primary end points. Nevertheless, niraparib as maintenance therapy modestly improved PFS in patients with platinum-responsive ES-SCLC, with acceptable tolerability profile and no new safety signal.     

Phase 2 prospective open label study of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel,trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 HER2+ breast cancer (HER2+ BC) to determine pathologic complete response (pCR), invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), and overall survival.

Methods

Forty-five patients with HER2+ BC Stages II–III were to be enrolled from 2013 to 2017. Patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m² intravenously), weekly trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg), and six cycles of pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg intravenously day 1 every 21 days).

Results

Median follow-up was 60 months (95% CI, 32.3–55.6) and pCR was 29/45 (64%). The 5-year iDFS for patients who achieved pCR (N = 29) was 96.3% (95% CI, 76.5–99.5) and non-pCR patients (N = 16) was 74.3% (95% CI, 39.1–91.0). The 5-year overall survival (N = 45) was 94.1% (95% CI, 77.6–98.5). Based on hormonal status, the 5-year iDFS for HR+ pCR patients (N = 14) was 92.3% (95% CI, 56.6–98.9) and for HR− (N = 15) was 100% (p = .3).

Conclusions

This anthracycline/carboplatin-free regimen with nab-paclitaxel achieved a pCR rate of 64% in patients with HER2+ BC. The 5-year iDFS in patients with and without pCR was 96.3% and 74.3%, respectively. The pCR rate is comparable with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab therapy in the NAT setting, but with fewer treatment-associated toxicities. This finding suggests the possibility of safe avoidance of anthracyclines and carboplatin as components of NAT in patients with HER2+ BC.     

Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system

This study analyzed outcomes of systemic chemotherapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the digestive system. Clinical data from 258 patients with unresectable or recurrent NEC of the gastrointestinal tract (GI) or hepato‐biliary‐pancreatic system (HBP), who received chemotherapy, were collected from 23 Japanese institutions and analyzed retrospectively. Patients had primary sites in the esophagus (n = 85), stomach (n = 70), small bowel (n = 6), colorectum (n = 31), hepato‐biliary system (n = 31) and pancreas (n = 31). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months the esophagus, 13.3 months for the stomach, 29.7 months for the small bowel, 7.6 months for the colorectum, 7.9 months for the hepato‐biliary system and 8.5 months for the pancreas. Irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) were most commonly selected for GI‐NEC and HBP‐NEC. For patients treated with IP/EP (n = 160/46), the response rate was 50/28% and median OS was 13.0/7.3 months. Multivariate analysis among patients treated with IP or EP showed that the primary site (GI vs HBP; hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.97) and baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase levels (not elevated vs elevated; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.94) were independent prognostic factors for OS, while the efficacy of IP was slightly better than for EP (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.48–1.33; P = 0.389). IP and EP are the most common treatment regimens for NEC of the digestive system. HBP primary sites and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels are unfavorable prognostic factors for survival. A randomized controlled trial is required to establish the appropriate chemotherapy regimen for advanced NEC of the digestive system. This study was registered at UMIN as trial number 000005176.     

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer—A Meta-Analysis

IntroductionWe performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line therapy in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.MethodsRandomized trials comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy were identified. We retrieved the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) of the intention-to-treat population and EGFR mutation–defined subgroups. We used the fixed-effects inverse variance–weighted method to pool estimates of treatment efficacy. Statistical tests were two sided.ResultsIn the three included studies that compared immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab [n = 292], pembrolizumab [n = 691], and atezolizumab [n =144]) against docetaxel (n = 776), immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged OS over that with docetaxel overall (n = 1903, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61–0.77, p < 0.0001) and in the EGFR wild-type subgroup (n = 1362, HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58–0.76, p < 0.0001) but not in the EGFR-mutant subgroup (n = 186, HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70–1.55, p < 0.81; treatment-mutation interaction p = 0.03).ConclusionIn EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not improve OS over that with docetaxel. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy should be elucidated to guide selection of second-line treatment for these patients.     

Prognostic factors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with TCF3::PBX1 in CCCG-ALL-2015: A multicenter study

Background

Contemporary risk-directed treatment has improved the outcome of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and TCF3::PBX1 fusion. In this study, the authors seek to identify prognostic factors that can be used to further improve outcome.

Methods

The authors studied 384 patients with this genotype treated on Chinese Children's Cancer Group ALL-2015 protocol between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. All patients provisionally received intensified chemotherapy in the intermediate-risk arm without prophylactic cranial irradiation; those with high minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥1% at day 46 (end) of remission induction were candidates for hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Results

The overall 5-year event-free survival was 84.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.6–88.3) and 5-year overall survival 88.9% (95% CI, 85.5–92.4). Independent factors associated with lower 5-year event-free survival were male sex (80.4%, [95% CI, 74.8–86.4] vs. 88.9%, [95% CI, 84.1–93.9] in female, p = .03) and positive day 46 MRD (≥0.01%) (62.1%, [95% CI, 44.2–87.4] vs. 87.1%, [95% CI, 83.4–90.9] in patients with negative MRD, p < .001). The presence of testicular leukemia at diagnosis (n = 10) was associated with particularly dismal 5-year event-free survival (33.3% [95% CI, 11.6–96.1] vs. 83.0% [95% CI, 77.5–88.9] in the other 192 male patients, p < .001) and was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio [HR], 5.7; [95% CI, 2.2–14.5], p < .001).

Conclusions

These data suggest that the presence of positive MRD after intensive remission induction and testicular leukemia at diagnosis are indicators for new molecular therapeutics or immunotherapy in patients with TCF3::PBX1 ALL.     

Daratumumab,Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Three-year Follow-up of CASTOR

BackgroundIn the phase III CASTOR study in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone. Outcomes after 40.0 months of median follow-up are discussed.Patients and MethodsEligible patients had received ≥ 1 line of treatment and were administered bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for 8 cycles with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression.ResultsOf 498 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (D-Vd, n = 251; Vd, n = 247), 47% had 1 prior line of treatment (1PL; D-Vd, n = 122; Vd, n = 113). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with D-Vd versus Vd in the ITT population (16.7 vs. 7.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.40; P < .0001) and the 1PL subgroup (27.0 vs. 7.9 months; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32; P < .0001). In lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median PFS was 7.8 versus 4.9 months (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.68; P = .0002) for D-Vd (n = 60) versus Vd (n = 81). Minimal residual disease (MRD)–negativity rates (10⁻⁵) were greater with D-Vd versus Vd (ITT: 14% vs. 2%; 1PL: 20% vs. 3%; both P < .0001). PFS2 was significantly prolonged with D-Vd versus Vd (ITT: HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38-0.61; 1PL: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.51; P < .0001). No new safety concerns were observed.ConclusionAfter 3 years, D-Vd maintained significant benefits in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with a consistent safety profile. D-Vd provided the greatest benefit at first relapse and increased MRD-negativity rates.     

Open-label,multicentre, randomised,phase II study of the EpSSG and the ITCC evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in childhood and adolescent patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (the BERNIE study)

PurposeWe evaluated the role of bevacizumab as part of the multi-modality treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS).Patients and methodsEligible patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years were randomised to receive induction chemotherapy (four cycles of IVADo + five cycles of IVA, ±bevacizumab), surgery and/or radiotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy (12 cycles of low-dose cyclophosphamide + vinorelbine, ±bevacizumab). The primary objective was event-free survival (EFS) evaluated by an independent radiological review committee.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-four patients were randomised to receive chemotherapy alone (n = 80) or with bevacizumab (n = 74). At the data cut-off for the primary efficacy analysis, median EFS was 14.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8–35.9) with chemotherapy and 20.6 months (95% CI: 15.2–24.9) with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.61–1.41; P = 0.72). The HR for EFS in patients with RMS (n = 103) was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.73–2.09) versus 0.64 (95% CI: 0.32–1.26) for those with NRSTS (n = 49). Objective response rate was 36.0% (95% CI: 25.2–47.9) with chemotherapy and 54.0% (95% CI: 40.9–66.6) with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (difference of 18.0%; 95% CI: 0.6–35.3). There were no treatment-related deaths and no increased incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities with bevacizumab.ConclusionThe addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy appeared tolerable in children and adolescents with metastatic RMS/NRSTS, but the primary end-point of EFS did not show statistically significant improvement.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00643565.     

Efficacy and Safety of Ceritinib (450 mg/d or 600 mg/d) With Food Versus 750-mg/d Fasted in Patients With ALK Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (ALK)–Positive NSCLC: Primary Efficacy Results From the ASCEND-8 Study

IntroductionIn an earlier report of the ASCEND-8 study (open-label, phase I, three-arm study, treatment-naive patients and pre-treated patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC), it was shown that ceritinib 450 mg with food had comparable exposure and better gastrointestinal tolerability than 750-mg fasted.MethodsHere, we report efficacy and updated safety data from primary efficacy analysis of the ASCEND-8 study. Key secondary endpoints were overall response rate and duration of response, assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1.ResultsIn total, 306 patients were randomized to ceritinib 450-mg fed (n = 108) or 600-mg fed (n = 87) or 750-mg fasted (n = 111), of which 304 patients were included in safety analysis and 198 treatment-naive patients (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase [ALK]–positive by immunohistochemistry) were included in the efficacy analysis (450-mg fed [n = 73], 600-mg fed [n = 51], and 750-mg fasted [n = 74]). The BIRC-assessed overall response rate was 78.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.9–86.9), 72.5% (95% CI: 58.3–84.1), and 75.7% (95% CI: 64.3–84.9), respectively; and the median duration of response (months) by BIRC was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 11.2–NE), 20.7 (95% CI: 15.8–NE), and 15.4 (95% CI: 8.3–NE), respectively. Based on the safety analysis (n = 304), the 450-mg fed arm showed the highest median relative dose intensity (100% versus 78.5% versus 83.7%), lowest proportion of patients with dose reductions (24.1% versus 65.1% versus 60.9%), and lowest proportion of patients with gastrointestinal toxicities (75.9% versus 82.6% versus 91.8%).ConclusionCeritinib at a dose of 450 mg with food compared to 750-mg fasted showed consistent efficacy and less gastrointestinal toxicity.     

Patterns of recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to inform personalized surveillance protocols

Background

Development of evidence-based post-treatment surveillance guidelines in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is limited by comprehensive documentation of patterns of recurrence and metastatic spread.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with R/M HNSCC at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between 1998– 2019 was performed (n = 447). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified patterns of recurrence and predictors of survival.

Results

Median overall survival (mOS) improved over time (6.7 months in 1998–2007 to 11.8 months in 2008–2019, p = .006). Predictors of worse mOS included human papillomavirus (HPV) negativity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–2.6), high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (HR, 2.1 [1.4–3.0], disease-free interval (DFI) ≤6 months (HR, 1.4 [1.02–2.0]), and poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ≥2; HR, 1.91.1–3.4). In this cohort, 50.6% of recurrences occurred within 6 months of treatment completion, 72.5% occurred within 1 year, and 88.6% occurred within 2 years. Metachronous distant metastases were more likely to occur in patients with HPV-positive disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.3 [1.4–4.0]), DFI >6 months (OR, 2.4 [1.5–4.0]), and body mass index ≥30 (OR, 2.3 [1.1–4.8]). Oligometastatic disease treated with local ablative therapy was associated with improved survival over polymetastatic disease (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24–0.55).

Conclusion

These data regarding patterns of distant metastasis in HNSCC support the clinical utility of early detection of recurrence. Patterns of recurrence in this population can be used to inform individualized surveillance programs as well as to risk-stratify eligible patients for clinical trials.

Plain Language Summary

• After treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), patients are at risk of recurrence at prior sites of disease or at distant sites in the body.
• This study includes a large group of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC and examines factors associated with survival outcomes and recurrence patterns.
• Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive HNC have good survival outcomes, but if they recur, this may be in distant regions of the body and may occur later than HPV-negative patients.
• These data argue for personalized follow-up schedules for patients with HNC, perhaps incorporating imaging studies or novel blood tests.

     

Afatinib versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed in Japanese patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutations: Subgroup analysis of LUX‐Lung 3

In LUX‐Lung 3, afatinib significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma patients and overall survival (OS) in Del19 patients. Preplanned analyses in Japanese patients from LUX‐Lung 3 were performed. Patients were randomized 2:1 to afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed, stratified by mutation type (Del19/L858R/Other). Primary endpoint was PFS (independent review). Secondary endpoints included OS, objective response, and safety. Median PFS (data cut‐off: February 2012) for afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was 13.8 vs 6.9 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.70; P = 0.0014) in all Japanese patients (N = 83), with more pronounced improvements in those with common mutations (Del19/L858R; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15–0.52; P < 0.0001) and Del19 mutations (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06–0.39; P < 0.0001). PFS was also improved in L858R patients (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20–1.25; P = 0.1309). Median OS (data cut‐off: November 2013) with afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was 46.9 vs 35.8 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40–1.43; P = 0.3791) in all Japanese patients, with greater benefit in patients with common mutations (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29–1.12; P = 0.0966) and Del19 mutations (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13–0.87; P = 0.0181); OS was not significantly different in L858R patients (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.40–3.21; P = 0.8212). Following study treatment discontinuation, most patients (93.5%) received subsequent anticancer therapy. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were diarrhea, rash/acne, nail effects and stomatitis with afatinib and nausea, decreased appetite, neutropenia, and leukopenia with cisplatin/pemetrexed. Afatinib significantly improved PFS versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in Japanese EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma patients and OS in Del19 but not L858R patients ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT00949650).     

IMpower132: Atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in Japanese patients

IMpower132 explored the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Key eligibility criteria for the phase 3, open-label, IMpower132 study included age ≥18 y, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-squamous NSCLC per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and no prior systemic treatment for stage IV NSCLC. Patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) or carboplatin (area under the concentration curve, 6 mg/mL/min) (APP arm) or chemotherapy alone (PP arm). The co-primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. A subgroup analysis was conducted in Japanese patients. In the Japanese subgroup (n = 101), median OS was 30.8 (95% CI, 24.3 to not estimable) mo in the APP arm (n = 48) and 22.2 (95% CI, 15.7-30.8) mo in the PP arm (n = 53; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.36-1.14]). PFS was 12.8 (95% CI, 8.6-16.6) mo in the APP arm vs 4.5 (95% CI, 4.1-6.7) mo in the PP arm (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21-0.58]). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 68.8% of APP arm patients and 44.2% of PP arm patients. Consistent with global study results, atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy improved efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs.     

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: The Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 cohort

COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, is still afflicting thousands of people across the globe. Few studies on COVID-19 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are available. Here, we analyzed data from the CLL cohort of the Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 (NCT04352556), which included 256 CLL patients enrolled between 25 February 2020 and 1 February 2021. Median age was 70 years (range 38–94) with male preponderance (60.1%). Approximately half of patients (n = 127) had received at least one line of therapy for CLL, including 108 (83.7%) who were on active treatment at the time of COVID-19 or received their last therapy within 12 months. Most patients (230/256, 89.9%) were symptomatic at COVID-19 diagnosis and the majority required hospitalization (n = 176). Overall, after a median follow-up of 42 days (IQR 24–96), case fatality rate was 30.1%, and it was 37.5% and 24.4% in the first (25 February 2020–22 June 2020) and second wave (23 June 2020–1 February 2021), respectively (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, male sex (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03–3.24, p = 0.04), age over than 70 years (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.23–4.05, p = 0.01), any treatment for CLL given in the last 12 months (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04–2.84, p = 0.04) and COVID-19 severity (severe: HR 5.66, 95% CI 2.62–12.33, p < 0.0001; critical: HR 15.99, 95% CI 6.93–36.90, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with poor survival. In summary, we report a dismal COVID-related outcome in a significant fraction of CLL patients, that can be nicely predicted by clinical parameters.     

A single-center analysis of the survival benefits of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

Background

Surgical resection is the only curative treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, the prognosis of BTC remains unsatisfactory. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy for BTC.

Methods

We performed a historical cohort study that involved 198 patients who underwent R0 surgical resection. Patients who underwent major hepatectomy were administered biweekly intravenous gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m². Otherwise, patients were administered intravenous gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m² in 3 weekly infusions, which were followed by a 1-week pause. The primary outcome was overall survival. The hazard ratio (HR) of adjuvant chemotherapy was estimated by propensity score-stratified Cox regression that was adjusted for confounders.

Results

Forty patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The HR of adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.47 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.28–0.95; P = 0.03]. Subgroup analysis showed that the survival benefits were possibly modified by lymph node positivity (HR 0.19; 95 % CI 0.07–0.58; interaction, P = 0.22), stage III (HR 0.11; 95 % CI 0.02–0.50; interaction, P < 0.01), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (HR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.01–0.67; interaction, P = 0.05), and poorly differentiated tumor (HR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.03–0.85; interaction, P = 0.13).

Conclusions

Adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy for BTC may be effective, particularly for patients with stage III and ICC.     

Three- versus six-month adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer patients: the efficacy results of Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) participation to the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) project

BackgroundThe International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) aimed to investigate whether a 3 months (3M) of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month (6M) administration in 3-year disease-free survival (3yDFS) in high-risk (HR) stage II or stage III colon cancer (CC).MethodsHellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)-IDEA randomized patients between 3M and 6M of CT with FOLFOX4 or CAPOX.ResultsIn total 1115 patients, 413 with HR stage II and 702 with stage III CC, were randomized. The median follow-up was 67.0 (38.3–126.0) months. Overall, 394 DFS events (202 in 3M arm and 192 in 6M arm) where recorded. The 3yDFS rate was 77.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 72.1% to 82.3%] for 3M and 77.9% (72.6% to 82.5%) for 6M of treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 1.05 (95% CI 0.61–1.55); P = 0.647]. Eighty DFS events (3M N = 41; 6M N = 39) were observed in HR stage II patients for a 3yDFS rate of 82.7% and 83.4%, respectively (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.68–1.63, P = 0.829). For stage III patients, 314 DFS events (3M N = 161 and 6M N = 153) were observed, for a 3yDFS rate of 72.9% for 3M versus 74.1% for 6M (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.81–1.42, P = 0.622). For HR stage II patients receiving FOLFOX4, 3yDFS rate was 76.7% for 3M and 79.3% for 6M (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.54–2.70). For HR stage II patients receiving CAPOX the 3yDFS rate was 85.4% for 3M and 83.8% for 6M (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.59–1.67). For stage III patients receiving FOLFOX4, the 3yDFS rate was 71.5% for 3M and 77.3% for 6M (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.74–1.86). For stage III patients receiving CAPOX, the 3yDFS rate was 74.5% for 3M and 74.7% for 6M (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.70–1.44).ConclusionsThe results of the HORG-IDEA study are in line with those of the global IDEA project, indicating that the 3yDFS is dependent on the administered adjuvant regimen and the choice and duration of regimen should be personalized.ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NumberNCT01308086.     

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.MethodsLiterature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.ResultsNineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.83; I² = 0; P < .001; n = 4) and grade 3–4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41–2.02; I² = 26.5; P = .809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.ConclusionsCombined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.     

Phase‐1 study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy‐naïve Japanese patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Persistent androgen synthesis under castration status in adrenal gland, testes and tumor cells is thought to be one of the major causes of development and progression of castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Abiraterone acetate (AA), the prodrug of abiraterone, which is an inhibitor of androgen synthesis enzymes, was evaluated for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, preliminary efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with CRPC in a phase‐1, open‐label and dose‐escalation study. Chemotherapy‐naïve Japanese CRPC patients (N = 27) received one of four AA daily doses (250 mg [n = 9], 500 mg [n = 6], 1000 [1 h premeal] mg [n = 6] and 1000 [2 h postmeal] mg [n = 6]) continuously through 28‐day treatment cycles. In the first cycle, AA monotherapy was given on days 1–7 for pharmacokinetics, and AA plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) from days 8 to 28. Of 27 patients, 9 continued treatment with AA until the data cut‐off date (18 July 2013). Over the evaluated dose range, plasma abiraterone concentrations increased with dose, with median t_max 2–3 h. At each dose level, mean serum corticosterone concentrations increased, while testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations rapidly decreased following a single AA dose and were further reduced to near the quantification limit on day 8 regardless of the dose. At least 3 patients from each dose‐group experienced ≥50% prostate‐specific antigen reduction, suggesting clinical benefit from AA in Japanese CRPC patients. AA was generally well‐tolerated, and, therefore, the recommended AA dosage regimen in Japanese CRPC patients is 1000 mg oral dose under modified fasting conditions (at least 1 h premeal or 2 h postmeal). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT01186484.     

Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations are lifestyle-based guidelines that aim to reduce cancer risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating associations between a score for adherence to the 2018 Cancer Prevention Recommendations and cancer risk was conducted.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for studies published to November 28, 2022. In meta-analysis, the estimated risk ratios and 95% CIs for adherence score as a continuous (per 1-point increment) and categorical (highest vs. lowest score category) variable using random-effects models were estimated.

Results

Eighteen studies (11 cohort; seven case-control) were included investigating incidence of breast (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), prostate (n = 2), lung (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 1), endometrial (n = 1), unknown primary cancer (n = 1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 1), and overall (any) cancer (n = 1). The summary risk ratio per 1-point increment in adherence score was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.93; I² = 76.5%; n = 7) for breast cancer, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84–0.91; I² = 26.2%; n = 4) for colorectal cancer, and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86–0.98, I² = 66.0%; n = 2) for lung cancer. There were no significant associations with prostate or other cancers. Meta-analysis results using categorical adherence score variables were consistent with these findings.

Conclusions

Greater adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations was associated with lower risk of breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Future studies investigating associations with risk of other forms of cancer are warranted.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42022313327.     

Surgical efficacy and quality of wide resection of the pelvic peritoneum in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

PurposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of adding an extensive pelvic peritoneal stripping procedure, termed “wide resection of the pelvic peritoneum,” (WRPP) to standard surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer on survival effectiveness and to investigate the role of ovarian cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the pelvic peritoneum.MethodsA total of 166 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing surgical treatment at Kumamoto University Hospital between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach: standard surgery (SS) group (n = 36), WRPP group (standard surgery plus WRPP, n = 100), and rectosigmoidectomy (RS) group (standard surgery plus RS, n = 30). Survival outcomes were compared between the three groups. CD44 variant 6 (CD44v6) and EpCAM expression, as markers of ovarian CSCs, in peritoneal disseminated tumors were evaluated using immunofluorescence staining.ResultsWith respect to patients with stage IIIA–IVB ovarian cancer, there were significant differences in overall and progression-free survival between the WRPP and SS groups, as revealed by univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.69; P = 0.003 and HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.95; P = 0.032, respectively) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17–0.70; P = 0.003 and HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.95; P = 0.032, respectively). Further, no significant differences were observed in survival outcomes between the RS group and the SS or WRPP group. Regarding the safety of WRPP, no significant differences in major intraoperative and postoperative complications were found between the three groups. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed a high percentage of CD44v6/EpCAM double-positive ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal disseminated tumors.ConclusionThe present study demonstrates that WRPP significantly contributes to improved survival in patients with stage IIIA–IVB ovarian cancer. WRPP could result in eradicating ovarian CSCs and disrupting the CSC niche microenvironment in the pelvic peritoneum.     

Clinical Response to Upfront Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors among Patients with Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and Tyrosine Kinase Gene Fusion

IntroductionMyeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusion (MLN-TK) is an entity encompassed of a heterogeneous group of rare hematopoietic neoplasms that are driven by gene fusion involving PDGDRA/B, FGFR1, JAK2, FLT3 or ETV6::ABL1. Though patients presenting with chronic phase MLN-TK with PDGFRA fusion display a favorable outcome in response to upfront TK inhibitor (TKI) therapy, the outcomes of MLNs driven by other TK fusions are not well described. In this study, we aimed to critically analyze the treatment outcomes of patients with MLN-TK, focusing on the role of upfront TKIs in both chronic- and blast-phase diseases.MethodsThe retrospective study included patients with confirmed MLN-TK from 3 centers and assessed demographic and clinical variables, treatment, and outcomes.ResultsForty-two patients with confirmed MLN-TK [PDGFRA (n = 22), PDGFRB (n = 4), FGFR1(n = 10), JAK2 (n = 2); and FLT3 (n = 3)] were included. Fifteen of 25 (60%) chronic-phased patients received upfront TKI therapy had a long-term remission. Nine of 16 (60%) blast-phase patients with upfront TKIs also achieved complete remission and remained alive at a median follow-up of 20 months. All 3 patients with blast phase disease who received upfront chemotherapy without positive response did not respond to subsequent TKI therapy, emphasizing the importance of initiating TKI therapy early. Upfront TKI therapy was associated with longer overall survival in univariate analyses (HR, 0.054 [95% CI, 0.007-0.42]) and multivariate analyses (HR, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.002-0.47]).ConclusionThe outcomes of upfront TKI therapy are excellent for MLN-TK in both chronic and blast phases, regardless of gene abnormalities.     

Circulating tumor DNA-based molecular residual disease detection for treatment monitoring in advanced melanoma patients

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially improved overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma; however, the lack of biomarkers to monitor treatment response and relapse remains an important clinical challenge. Thus, a reliable biomarker is needed that can risk-stratify patients for disease recurrence and predict response to treatment.

Methods

A retrospective analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay on prospectively collected plasma samples (n = 555) from 69 patients with advanced melanoma was performed. Patients were divided into three cohorts: cohort A (N = 30), stage III patients receiving adjuvant ICI/observation; cohort B (N = 29), unresectable stage III/IV patients receiving ICI therapy; and cohort C (N = 10), stage III/IV patients on surveillance after planned completion of ICI therapy for metastatic disease.

Results

In cohort A, compared to molecular residual disease (MRD)-negative patients, MRD-positivity was associated with significantly shorter distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; hazard ratio [HR], 10.77; p = .01). Increasing ctDNA levels from the post-surgical or pre-treatment time point to after 6 weeks of ICI were predictive of shorter DMFS in cohort A (HR, 34.54; p < .0001) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in cohort B (HR, 22; p = .006). In cohort C, all ctDNA-negative patients remained progression-free for a median follow-up of 14.67 months, whereas ctDNA-positive patients experienced disease progression.

Conclusion

Personalized and tumor-informed longitudinal ctDNA monitoring is a valuable prognostic and predictive tool that may be used throughout the clinical course of patients with advanced melanoma.