Smaller tidal volumes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of adult and paediatric self-inflatable bags with three different ventilatory devices

Gastric inflation and subsequent regurgitation of stomach contents is a major hazard of bag-valve-face mask ventilation during the basic life support phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Recent investigations suggested that use of a paediatric self-inflating bag may reduce stomach inflation while ensuring sufficient lung ventilation. The purpose of our study was to examine whether use of a paediatric self-inflating bag in association with laryngeal mask airway, combitube, and bag-valve-face mask may provide adequate lung ventilation, while reducing the risk of gastric inflation in a bench model simulating the initial phase of CPR. Sixteen intensive care unit registered nurses volunteered for our study. Use of a paediatric versus adult self-inflating bag resulted in a significantly (P < 0.01) lower mean (+/- S.D.) tidal lung volume with both the laryngeal mask airway and combitube (laryngeal mask airway 349 +/- 149 ml versus 725 +/- 266 ml, combitube 389 +/- 113 ml versus 1061 +/- 451 ml). Lung tidal volumes were below the European Resuscitation Council recommendation with both self-inflatable bags in the bag-valve-face mask group (paediatric versus adult self-inflatable bag 256 +/- 77 ml versus 334 +/- 125 ml). Esophageal tidal volumes were significantly (P < 0.05) lower using the paediatric self-inflatable bag in the bag-valve-face mask group; almost no gastric inflation occurred with the laryngeal mask airway, and none with the combitube. In conclusion, use of the paediatric self-inflating bag may reduce gastric inflation, but measured lung tidal volumes are below the European Resuscitation Council recommendation when used with either, the laryngeal mask airway, combitube, or bag-valve-face mask.     

Emergency airway management-- comparison of various strategies in an unsecured airway

OBJECTIVES: Gastric inflation and regurgitation of stomach contents are major hazards of bag-valve-mask ventilation in an emergency. The purpose of our study was to determine lung ventilation and gastric inflation when using the bag-valve-face mask, laryngeal mask, and combitube with different sizes of self-inflating bags (max. volume: 700, 1100, 1500 ml). METHODS: Twenty-six training emergency doctors without prior extensive training in emergency airway management volunteered for our study and ventilated a bench model simulating an unintubated respiratory arrest patient with bag-valve-face mask, laryngeal mask, and combitube using paediatric, medium size, and adult self-inflating bags. Lung and gastric tidal volume, as well as lung and gastric peak airway pressure were measured with respiratory monitors and a pneumotachometer. RESULTS: When using either the combitube or the laryngeal mask, the paediatric vs. medium-size and adult self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P < .001) lower mean +/- SEM lung tidal volumes (328 +/- 34 vs. 626 +/- 65 vs. 654 +/- 69 ml; and 368 +/- 30 vs. 532 +/- 48 vs. 692 +/- 67 ml, respectively). No gastric inflation occurred with the combitube, while gastric inflation was comparably low when using the laryngeal mask with either ventilation bag (3 +/- 2 vs. 7 +/- 4 vs. 6 +/- 3 ml; P = NS). The paediatric vs. medium-size and adult self-inflating bag in combination with the bag-valve-face mask resulted in comparable lung tidal volumes (250 +/- 23 vs. 313 +/- 24 vs. 282 +/- 38 ml; P = NS); but significantly (P < .01) lower gastric tidal volumes (147 +/- 23 vs. 206 +/- 24 vs. 267 +/- 23 ml). CONCLUSIONS: Both the laryngeal mask and the combitube proved to be valid alternatives for the bag-valve-face mask in our experimental model. The medium size self-inflating bag seems to be adequate when using either the laryngeal mask or the combitube.     

Effectiveness of various airway management techniques in a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient

The purpose of this study was to assess the levels of lung and gastric tidal volumes paramedics achieve when performing ventilation with bag-valve-mask, laryngeal mask, and Combitube. Twenty paramedics performed ventilation with a bag-valve mask, laryngeal mask, and Combitube in a bench model simulating an unintubated cardiorespiratory arrest patient. Lung and gastric tidal volumes and lung and gastric peak airway pressures were subsequently measured. The results showed that mean +/- SEM lung tidal volumes were significantly higher with the laryngeal mask and Combitube compared to the bag-valve-mask (701 +/- 264 vs. 742 +/- 311 vs. 353 +/- 110 mL, respectively). No gastric inflation occurred with the Combitube; gastric inflation was significantly lower with the laryngeal mask compared to the bag-valve-mask (25 +/- 15 vs. 230 +/- 25 mL, respectively). Both the laryngeal mask and Combitube proved to be valid alternatives for bag-valve-mask ventilation in our bench model simulating an unintubated patient with cardiorespiratory arrest.     

Intubating laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube, 1100 ml self-inflating bag-alternatives for basic life support?

Insufficient oxygenation, ventilation and gastric inflation with subsequent regurgitation of stomach contents is a major hazard of bag-valve-face mask ventilation during the basic life support phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The European Resuscitation Council has recommended smaller tidal volumes of approximately 500 ml as an effort to reduce gastric inflation; furthermore, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube have been recently developed in order to provide rapid ventilation and to secure the airway. The purpose of our study was to examine whether usage of a newly developed medium-size self-inflating bag (maximum volume, 1100 ml) in association with the intubating laryngeal mask airway, and laryngeal tube may provide adequate lung ventilation, while reducing the risk of gastric inflation in a bench model simulating the initial phase of CPR. Twenty house officers volunteered for our study. When using the laryngeal tube, and the intubating laryngeal mask airway, respectively, the medium-size (maximum volume, 1100 ml) versus adult (maximum volume, 1500 ml) self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P<0.05) lower mean+/-S.E.M. lung tidal volumes (605+/-22 vs. 832+/-4 ml, and 666+/-27 vs. 887+/-37 ml, respectively), but comparable peak airway pressures. No gastric inflation occurred when using both devices with either ventilation bag. In conclusion, both the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in combination with both an 1100 and 1500 ml maximum volume self inflating bag proved to be valid alternatives for emergency airway management in a bench model of a simulated unintubated cardiac arrest victim.     

Emergency airway management by non-anaesthesia house officers--a comparison of three strategies

Objectives—The purpose of this study was to determine effects of different airway devices and tidal volumes on lung ventilation and gastric inflation in an unprotected airway.

Methods—Thirty one non-anaesthesia house officers volunteered for the study, and ventilated a bench model simulating an unintubated respiratory arrest patient with bag-valve-facemask, laryngeal mask airway, and combitube using paediatric and adult self inflating bags.

Results—The paediatric versus adult self inflating bag resulted with the laryngeal mask airway and combitube in significantly (p<0.001) lower mean (SEM) lung tidal volumes (376 (30) v 653 (47) ml, and 368 (28) v 727 (53) ml, respectively). Gastric inflation was zero with the combitube; and 0 (0) v 8 (3) ml with the laryngeal mask airway with low versus large tidal volumes. The paediatric versus adult self inflating bag with the bag-valve-facemask resulted in comparable lung tidal volumes (245 (19) v 271 (33) ml; p=NS); but significantly (p<0.001) lower gastric tidal volume (149 (11) v 272 (24) ml).

Conclusions—The paediatric self inflating bag may be an option to reduce the risk of gastric inflation when using the laryngeal mask airway, and especially, the bag-valve-facemask. Both the laryngeal mask airway and combitube proved to be valid alternatives for the bag-valve-facemask in this experimental model.

     

Assessment of the use of the laryngeal tube for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a manikin.

During 60 3-min CPR sequences, the face mask, laryngeal tube and tracheal tube were compared using an Ambu Megacode Trainer. Ten 3-min sequences each were performed for both a combination of the face mask and laryngeal tube with a bag-valve device (compression-ventilation ratio 5:1). With continuous chest compressions, ten 3-min CPR sequences each were performed for a combination of the laryngeal tube and tracheal tube with a bag-valve device and ten 3-min CPR sequences each for a combination of the laryngeal tube and tracheal tube with an automatic transport ventilator. Signs of gastric inflation occurred only with the face mask. Ventilation with the laryngeal tube was significantly better than with the face mask and comparable to the tracheal tube during ventilation with the bag-valve device and with the automatic transport ventilator. Chest compressions caused a significant decrease in tidal volumes during ventilation with the automatic transport ventilator. The findings of this study support the idea of the laryngeal tube as a new adjunct for emergency airway management, but will have to be verified during clinical practice.     

Decreasing peak flow rate with a new bag-valve-mask device: effects on respiratory mechanics,and gas distribution in a bench model of an unprotected airway

Reducing inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure may be important in order to minimise the risk of stomach inflation when ventilating an unprotected airway with positive pressure ventilation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a newly developed bag-valve-mask device (SMART BAG), O-Two Systems International, Ont., Canada) that limits peak inspiratory flow. A bench model simulating a patient with an unintubated airway was used consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung (lung compliance, 100 ml/cm H(2)O, airway resistance 4 cm H(2)O/l/s, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure 20 cm H(2)O and simulated stomach). Twenty nurses were randomised to each ventilate the manikin using a standard single person technique for 1 min (respiratory rate, 12/min) with either a standard adult self-inflating bag, or the SMART BAG. The volunteers were blinded to the experimental design of the model until completion of the experimental protocol. The SMART BAG vs. standard self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P<0.05) lower mean+/-S.D. peak inspiratory flow rates (32+/-2 vs. 61+/-13 l/min), peak inspiratory pressure (12+/-2 vs. 17+/-2 cm H(2)O), lung tidal volumes (525+/-111 vs. 680+/-154 ml) and stomach tidal volumes (0+/-0 vs. 17+/-36 ml), longer inspiratory times (1.9+/-0.3 vs. 1.5+/-0.3 s), but significantly higher mask leakage (26+/-13 vs. 14+/-8%); mask tidal volumes (700+/-104 vs. 785+/-172 ml) were comparable. The mask leakage observed is not an uncommon factor in bag-valve-mask ventilation with leakage fractions of 25-40% having been previously reported. The differences observed between the standard BVM and the SMART BAG are due more to the anatomical design of the mask and the non-anatomical shape of the manikin face than the function of the device. Future studies should remove the mask to manikin interface and should introduce a standardized mask leakage fraction. The use of a two-person technique may have removed the problem of mask leakage. In conclusion, using the SMART BAG during simulated ventilation of an unintubated patient in respiratory arrest significantly decreased inspiratory flow rate, peak inspiratory pressure, stomach tidal volume, and resulted in a significantly longer inspiratory time when compared to a standard self-inflating bag.     

Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation

Reducing inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure may be important in order to minimise the risk of stomach inflation when ventilating an unprotected airway with positive pressure ventilation. This study was designed to yield enough power to determine whether employing an inspiratory gas flow limiting bag-valve device (SMART BAG, O-Two Medical Technologies Inc., Ontario, Canada) would also decrease the likelihood of stomach inflation in an established bench model of a simulated unintubated respiratory arrest patient. The bench model consists of a training lung (lung compliance, 50 ml/cm H2O; airway resistance, 4 cm H2O/l/s) and a valve simulating lower oesophageal sphincter opening at a pressure of 19 cm H(2)O. One hundred and ninety-one emergency medicine physicians were requested to ventilate the manikin utilising a standard single-person technique for 1 min (respiratory rate, 12/min; Vt, 500 ml) with both a standard adult bag-valve-mask and the SMART BAG. The volunteers were blinded to the experimental design of the model until completion of the experimental protocol. The SMART BAG versus standard bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly (P < 0.001) lower (mean +/- S.D.) mean airway pressure (14 +/- 2 cm H2O versus 16 +/- 3 cm H2O), respiratory rates (13 +/- 3 breaths per min versus 14 +/- 4 breaths per min), incidence of stomach inflation (4.2% versus 38.7%) and median stomach inflation volumes (351 [range, 18-1211 ml] versus 1426 [20-5882 ml]); lung tidal volumes (538 +/- 97 ml versus 533 +/- 97 ml) were comparable. Inspiratory to expiratory ratios were significantly (P < 0.001) increased (1.7 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.6). In conclusion, the SMART BAG reduced inspiratory flow, mean airway pressure and both the incidence and actual volume of stomach inflation compared with a standard bag-valve-mask device while maintaining delivered lung tidal volumes and increasing the inspiratory to expiratory ratio.     

Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes

If the airway of a cardiac arrest patient is unprotected, basic life support with low rather than high inspiratory flow rates may reduce stomach inflation. Further, if the inspiratory flow rate is fixed such as with a resuscitator performance may improve; especially when used by less experienced rescuers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of limited flow ventilation on respiratory variables, and lung and stomach volumes, when compared with a bag valve device. After institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained, 20 critical care unit registered nurses volunteered to ventilate a bench model simulating a cardiac arrest patient with an unprotected airway consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung [with lung compliance, 50 ml/0.098 kPa (50 ml/cmH(2)O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l/s (4 cmH(2)O/l/s)] oesophagus [lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 0.49 kPa (5 cmH(2)O)] and simulated stomach. Each volunteer ventilated the model with a self-inflating bag (Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark; max. volume, 1500 ml), and a resuscitator providing limited fixed flow (Oxylator EM 100, CPR Medical devices Inc., Toronto, Canada) for 2 min; study endpoints were measured with 2 pneumotachometers. The self-inflating bag vs. resuscitator resulted in comparable mean +/- SD mask tidal volumes (945 +/- 104 vs. 921 +/- 250 ml), significantly (P < 0.05) higher peak inspiratory flow rates (111 +/- 27 vs. 45 +/- 21 l/min), and peak inspiratory pressure (1.2 +/- 0.47 vs. 78 +/- 0.07 kPa), but significantly shorter inspiratory times (1.1 +/- 0.29 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.35 s). Lung tidal volumes were comparable (337 +/- 120 vs. 309 +/- 61 ml), but stomach tidal volumes were significantly (P < 0.05) higher (200 +/- 95 vs. 140 +/- 51 ml) with the self-inflating bag. In conclusion, simulated ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest patient using a resuscitator resulted in decreased peak flow rates and therefore, in decreased peak airway pressures when compared with a self-inflating bag. Limited flow ventilation using the resuscitator decreased stomach inflation, although lung tidal volumes were comparable between groups.     

Optimizing bag-valve-mask ventilation with a new mouth-to-bag resuscitator

When ventilating an unintubated patient with a self-inflating bag, high peak inspiratory flow rates may result in high peak airway pressure with subsequent stomach inflation; this may occur frequently when rescuers without daily experience in bag-valve-mask ventilation need to perform advanced airway management. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a newly developed self-inflating bag (mouth-to-bag resuscitator; Ambu, Glostrup, Denmark) that limits peak inspiratory flow. A bench model simulating a patient with an unintubated airway was used, consisting of a face mask, manikin head, training lung (lung compliance, 100 ml/0.098 kPa (100 ml/cm H(2)O)); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/l per second (4 cm H(2)O/l/s), oesophagus (LESP, 1.96 kPa (20 cm H(2)O)) and simulated stomach. Twenty nurses were randomised to ventilate the manikin for 1 min (respiratory rate: 12 per minute) with either a standard self-inflating bag or the mouth-to-bag resuscitator, which requires the rescuer to blow up a single-use balloon inside the self-inflating bag, which in turns displaces air towards the patient. When supplemental oxygen is added, ventilation with up to 100% oxygen may be obtained, since expired air is only used as the driving gas. The mouth-to-bag resuscitator therefore allows two instead of one hand sealing the mask on the patient's face. The volunteers were blinded to the experimental design of the model until completion of the experimental protocol. The mouth-to-bag resuscitator versus standard self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P<0.05) higher mean+/-S.D. mask tidal volumes (1048+/-161 vs. 785+/-174 ml) and lung tidal volumes (911+/-148 vs. 678+/-157 ml), longer inspiratory times (1.7+/-0.4 vs. 1.4+/-0.4 s), but significantly lower peak inspiratory flow rates (50+/-9 vs. 62+/-13 l/min) and mask leakage (10+/-4 vs. 15+/-9%); peak inspiratory pressure (17+/-2 vs. 17+/-2 cm H(2)O) and stomach tidal volumes (16+/-30 vs. 18+/-35 ml) were comparable. In conclusion, employing the mouth-to-bag resuscitator during simulated ventilation of an unintubated patient in respiratory arrest significantly decreased inspiratory flow rate and improved lung tidal volumes, while decreasing mask leakage.     

Effects of decreasing inspiratory times during simulated bag-valve-mask ventilation

During CPR, an inspiratory time of 2 s is recommended when the airway is unprotected; indicating that approximately 30% of the resuscitation attempt is spent on ventilation, but not on chest compressions. Since survival rates may not decrease when ventilation levels are relatively low, and uninterrupted chest compressions with a constant rate of approximately 100/min have been shown to be lifesaving, it may be beneficial to cut down the time spent on ventilation, and instead, increase the time for chest compressions. In an established bench model of a simulated unprotected airway, we evaluated if inspiratory time can be decreased from 2 to 1 s at different lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) levels during ventilation with a bag-valve-mask device. In comparison with an inspiratory time of 2 s, 1 s resulted in significantly (p < 0.001) higher peak airway pressure and peak inspiratory flow rate, while lung tidal volumes at all LOSP levels were clinically comparable. Neither ventilation strategy produced stomach inflation at 20 cmH2O LOSP, and 1 s versus 2 s inspiratory time did not produce significantly higher (mean +/- S.D.) stomach inflation at 15 (8 +/-9 ml versus 0 +/- 0 ml; p < 0.01) and 10 cmH2O LOSP (69 +/- 20 ml versus 34 +/- 18 ml; p < 0.001), and significantly lower stomach inflation at 5 cmH2O LOSP (219 +/- 16 ml versus 308 +/- 21 ml; p < 0.001) per breath. Total cumulative stomach inflation volume over constantly decreasing LOSP levels with an inspiratory time of 2 s versus 1 s was higher (6820 ml versus 5920 ml). In conclusion, in this model of a simulated unprotected airway, a reduction of inspiratory time from 2 to 1 s resulted in a significant increase of peak airway pressure and peak inspiratory flow rate, while lung tidal volumes remained clinically comparable (up to approximately 15% difference), but statistically different due to the precise measurements. Theoretically, this may increase the time available for, and consequently the actual number of, chest compressions during CPR by approximately 25% without risking an excessive increase in stomach inflation.     

Emergency airway management by intensive care unit nurses with the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube

When using the laryngeal tube and the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), the medium-size (maximum volume 1100 ml) versus adult (maximum volume 1500 ml) self-inflating bags resulted in significantly lower lung tidal volumes. No gastric inflation occurred when using both devices with either ventilation bag. The newly developed medium-size self-inflating bag may be an option to further reduce the risk of gastric inflation while maintaining sufficient lung ventilation. Both the ILMA and laryngeal tube proved to be valid alternatives for emergency airway management in the experimental model used.     

A strategy to optimise the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway

When ventilating an unintubated patient with a standard adult self-inflating bag, high peak inspiratory flow rates may result in high peak airway pressures with subsequent stomach inflation. In a previous study we have tested a newly developed mouth-to-bag-resuscitator (max. volume, 1500 ml) that limits peak inspiratory flow, but the possible advantages were masked by excessive tidal volumes. The mouth-to-bag-resuscitator requires blowing up a balloon inside the self-inflating bag that subsequently displaces air, which then flows into the patient's airway. Due to this mechanism, gas flow and peak airway pressures are reduced during inspiration when compared with a standard bag-valve-mask-device. In addition, the device allows the rescuer to use two hands instead of one to seal the mask on the patient's face. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator, which was modified to produce a maximum tidal volume of 500 ml, compared with a paediatric self-inflating bag (max. volume, 380 ml), and a standard adult self-inflating bag (max. volume, 1500 ml) in an established bench model simulating an unintubated patient with respiratory arrest. The bench model consisted of a face mask, manikin head, training lung (lung compliance, 100 ml/0.098 kPa (100ml/cm H2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/(l s) (4 cm H2O/(l s)), and a valve simulating lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 1.47 kPa (15 cm H2O). Twenty critical care nurses volunteered for the study and ventilated the manikin for 1 min with a respiratory rate of 20 min(-1) with each ventilation device in random order. The mouth-to-bag-resuscitator versus paediatric self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) higher lung tidal volumes (302 +/- 41 ml versus 233 +/- 22 ml), and peak airway pressure (10 +/- 1 cm H2O versus 9 +/- 1 cm H2O), but comparable inspiratory time fraction (28 +/- 5% versus 27 +/- 5%, Ti/Ttot), peak inspiratory flow rate (0.6 +/- .01 l/s versus 0.6 +/- 0.2 l/s), and stomach inflation (149 +/- 495 ml/min versus 128 +/- 278 ml/min). In comparison with the adult self-inflating bag, there was significantly (P < 0.05) less gastric inflation (3943 +/- 4896 ml/min versus 149 +/- 495 ml/min versus 128 +/- 278 ml/min, respectively) with both devices, but the standard adult self-inflating bag had significantly higher lung tidal volumes (566 +/- 77 ml), peak airway pressure (13 +/- 1 cm H2O), and peak inspiratory flow rate (0.8 +/- 0.11 l/s). In conclusion, comparing the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator with small tidal volumes versus the paediatric self-inflating-bag during simulated ventilation of an unintubated patient in respiratory arrest resulted in comparable marginal stomach inflation, but significantly reduced the likelihood of gastric inflation compared to the adult self-inflating-bag. Lung tidal volumes were improved from approximately 250 ml with the paediatric self-inflating-bag to approximately 300 ml with the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator.     

Effects of face mask ventilation in apneic patients with a resuscitation ventilator in comparison with a bag-valve-mask

Bag-valve-mask ventilation in an unprotected airway is often applied with a high flow rate or a short inflation time and, therefore, a high peak airway pressure, which may increase the risk of stomach inflation and subsequent pulmonary aspiration. Strategies to provide more patient safety may be a reduction in inspiratory flow and, therefore, peak airway pressure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of bag-valve-mask ventilation vs. a resuscitation ventilator on tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and peak inspiratory flow rate in apneic patients. In a crossover design, 40 adults were ventilated during induction of anesthesia with either a bag-valve-mask device with room air, or an oxygen-powered, flow-limited resuscitation ventilator. The study endpoints of expired tidal volume, minute volume, respiratory rate, peak airway pressure, delta airway pressure, peak inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory time fraction were measured using a pulmonary monitor. When compared with the resuscitation ventilator, the bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly higher (mean+/-SD) peak airway pressure (15.3+/-3 vs. 14.1+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p=0.001) and delta airway pressure (14+/-3 vs. 12+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p<0.001), but significantly lower oxygen saturation (95+/-3 vs. 98+/-1%, respectively; p<0.001). No patient in either group had clinically detectable stomach inflation. We conclude that the resuscitation ventilator is at least as effective as traditional bag-valve-mask or face mask resuscitation in this population of very controlled elective surgery patients.     

Comparison of different airway management strategies to ventilate apneic,nonpreoxygenated patients

OBJECTIVE: Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for providing emergency ventilation, but acquiring and maintaining intubation skills may be difficult. Recent reports indicate that even in urban emergency medical services with a high call volume, esophageal intubations were observed, requiring either perfect intubation skills or development of alternatives for emergency ventilation. DESIGN: Simulated emergency ventilation in apneic patients employing four different airway devices that used small tidal volumes. SETTING: University hospital operating room. SUBJECTS: Forty-eight ASA I/II patients who signed written informed consent before being enrolled into the study. INTERVENTIONS: In healthy adult patients without underlying respiratory or cardiac disease who were breathing room air before undergoing routine induction of surgery, 12 experienced professional paramedics inserted either a laryngeal mask airway (n = 12), Combitube (n = 12), or cuffed oropharyngeal airway (n = 12) or placed a face mask (n = 12) before providing ventilation with a pediatric (maximum volume, 700 mL) self-inflating bag with 100% oxygen for 3 mins. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three of 12 cuffed oropharyngeal airway patients, two of 12 laryngeal mask airway patients, and one of 12 Combitube patients, oxygen saturation fell below 90% during airway device insertion, and the experiment was terminated; no oxygenation failures occurred with the bag-valve-mask. Oxygen saturation decreased significantly (p <.05) during insertion of the Combitube and laryngeal mask but not with the bag-valve-mask and cuffed oropharyngeal airway; however, oxygen saturation increased after 1 min of ventilation with 100% oxygen. No differences in tidal lung volumes were observed between airway devices. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics were able to employ the laryngeal mask airway, Combitube, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in apneic patients with normal lung compliance and airways. In this population, bag-valve-mask ventilation was the most simple and successful strategy. Small tidal volumes applied with a pediatric self-inflating bag and 100% oxygen resulted in adequate oxygenation and ventilation.     

Device capable of reducing gastric inflation during artificial ventilation in a manikin model

Gastric inflation is a significant issue when ventilation is performed in cases of unprotected airway. The objective of this study was to compare the amounts of gastric insufflation and tidal volumes produced by a hose-extended bag-valve-mask (BVM) device supplemented by an interposed reservoir bag with a similar BVM without the reservoir in a simulated human model. Fourteen academic dental staff members performed 10 ventilations on a manikin using the reservoir-supplemented device in comparison to the control BVM in a randomized order. Lung compliance was adjusted to 45 (high) and 4.5 mL/mbar (low), and the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) simulator to a pressure of 15 and 3 mbar, respectively, in different settings. Lower tidal volumes were observed with the new device than with the control BVM at high compliance with LOSP of 15 mbar (median 506 vs. 787 mL, respectively; p = 0.0002) and LOSP of 3 mbar (median 544 vs. 794 mL, respectively; p = 0.0006), as well as during ventilation at low lung compliance and LOSP of 3mbar (median 131 vs. 163 mL, respectively; p = 0.0342). No differences were detected at low lung compliance and LOSP of 15 mbar (median 175 vs. 194 mL; p = 0.3804). Gastric inflation almost exclusively occurred in case of low lung compliance, being markedly lower with the new device than with the control device at 15 mbar LOSP (300 vs. 2225 mL, respectively; p = 0.0006), and at 3 mbar LOSP (1138 vs. 3050 mL, respectively; p = 0.0001). Application of the hose-extended bag-valve-mask device supplemented with a reservoir bag reduces tidal volumes. Marked reduction of gastric inflation by use of this device becomes effective under conditions with low lung compliance.     

Smaller tidal volumes with room-air are not sufficient to ensure adequate oxygenation during bag-valve-mask ventilation

The European Resuscitation Council has recommended decreasing tidal volume during basic life support ventilation from 800 to 1200 ml, as recommended by the American Heart Association, to 500 ml in order to minimise stomach inflation. However, if oxygen is not available at the scene of an emergency, and small tidal volumes are given during basic life support ventilation with a paediatric self-inflatable bag and room-air (21% oxygen), insufficient oxygenation and/or inadequate ventilation may result. When apnoea occurred after induction of anaesthesia, 40 patients were randomly allocated to room-air ventilation with either an adult (maximum volume, 1500 ml) or paediatric (maximum volume, 700 ml) self-inflatable bag for 5 min before intubation. When using an adult (n=20) versus paediatric (n=20) self-inflatable bag, mean +/-SEM tidal volumes and tidal volumes per kilogram were significantly (P<0.0001) larger (719+/-22 vs. 455+/-23 ml and 10.5+/-0.4 vs. 6.2+/-0.4 ml kg(-1), respectively). Compared with an adult self-inflatable bag, bag-valve-mask ventilation with room-air using a paediatric self-inflatable bag resulted in significantly (P<0.01) lower paO(2) values (73+/-4 vs. 87+/-4 mmHg), but comparable carbon dioxide elimination (40+/-2 vs. 37+/-1 mmHg; NS). In conclusion, our results indicate that smaller tidal volumes of approximately 6 ml kg(-1) ( approximately 500 ml) given with a paediatric self-inflatable bag and room-air maintain adequate carbon dioxide elimination, but do not result in sufficient oxygenation during bag-valve-mask ventilation. Thus, if small (6 ml kg(-1)) tidal volumes are being used during bag-valve-mask ventilation, additional oxygen is necessary. Accordingly, when additional oxygen during bag-valve-mask ventilation is not available, only large tidal volumes of approximately 11 ml kg(-1) were able to maintain both sufficient oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination.     

Comparison of an oxygen-powered flow-limited resuscitator to manual ventilation with an adult 1,000-mL self-inflating bag

BACKGROUND: Positive-pressure ventilation of patients with unprotected airways during cardiopulmonary resuscitation can cause gastric dilation. OBJECTIVE: Determine if there is a significant difference in volume delivered to lungs and stomach while using an adult 1,000-mL disposable bag-valve-mask (BVM) device and the oxygen-powered, flow-limited Oxylator EMX resuscitator. METHODS: We used a bench model to simulate a patient with an unprotected airway, consisting of an intubation manikin, lung analog, and simulated lower esophageal sphincter set at an opening pressure of 20 cm H2O. The BVM and the Oxylator were used to provide mask ventilation at a verbally prompted rate of 12 breaths/min. RESULTS: The volumes delivered with the BVM and the Oxylator to the lungs and stomach were not significantly different: 262 + 112 mL versus 297 + 99 mL and 227 + 199 mL versus 159 + 73 mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant difference between the Oxylator and BVM when comparing tidal volume delivered to lungs and stomach during ventilation of a simulated unconscious nonintubated patient. More research on BVM use and the Oxylator should be done to validate the American Heart Association's guideline recommendations for ventilating unconscious patients with unprotected airways. Research on gastric dilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation needs to be done with bench models using manikins that simulate chest excursion, bidirectional airway flow, lung impedance, and gastric compliance.     

Assessment of pulmonary mechanics and gastric inflation pressure during mask ventilation

INTRODUCTION: Mask ventilation is a procedure routinely used in emergency medicine. Potential hazards are inadequate alveolar ventilation and inflation of the stomach with air, leading to subsequent regurgitation and aspiration. The aim of this study was to measure lung function and gastric inflation pressures during mask ventilation. METHODS: For this purpose, 31 patients scheduled for routine urological procedures were studied during induction of anesthesia. Lung function was assessed by recording respiratory flow and pressure directly at the face mask. Gastric inflation was observed with a microphone taped to the epigastric area. RESULTS: Gastric inflation occurred in 22 of the 31 patients. Mean gastric inflation pressure was 27.5 +/- 6.55 cm H2O, mean compliance was 67 +/- 24.1 ml/cm H2O, mean resistance was 17.4 +/- 6.41 cm H2O/L/sec, and the mean respiratory time constant was 1.1 +/- 0.26 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that inspiratory pressure be limited to 20 cm H2O, and that an inspiratory time of at least four times the respiratory time constant be allowed. Monitoring airway pressure and gastric inflation is a simple technique that may improve the safe-ty of patients during mask ventilation.     

New airways for resuscitation?

Over the last 15 years supraglottic airway devices (SADs), most notably the classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have revolutionised airway management in anaesthesia. In contrast for resuscitation, both in and outside hospital, facemask ventilation and tracheal intubation remain the mainstays of airway management. However there is evidence that both these techniques have complications and are often poorly performed by inexperienced personnel. Tracheal intubation also has the potential to cause serious harm or death through unrecognised oesophageal intubation. SADs may have a role in airway management for resuscitation as first responder devices, rescue devices or for use during patient extraction. In particular they may be beneficial as the level of skill required to use the device safely may be less than for the tracheal tube. Concerns have been expressed over the ability to ventilate the lungs successfully and also the risk of aspiration with SADs. The only SADs recommended by ILCOR in its current guidance are the classic LMA and combitube. Several SADs have recently been introduced with claims that ventilation and airway protection is improved. This pragmatic review examines recent developments in SAD technology and the relevance of this to the potential for using SADs during resuscitation. In addition to examining research directly related to resuscitation both on bench models and in patients the review also examines evidence from anaesthetic practice. SADS discussed include the classic, intubating and Proseal LMAs, the combitube, the laryngeal tube, laryngeal tube sonda mark I and II and single use laryngeal masks.