Outcomes of liver transplantation in HIV-infected individuals: the impact of HCV and HBV infection.

Liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals is considered to be an experimental therapy with limited reported worldwide experience, and little long-term survival data. Published data suggest that the short-term outcome is encouraging in selected patients. Here, we report our experience in 14 HIV-infected liver allograft recipients, and compare outcomes between those coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the non-HCV group. A total of 14 HIV-infected patients (12 male, 2 female, age range 26-59 years) underwent LT between January 1995 and April 2003. Indications for LT were HCV (n = 7), hepatitis B virus (HBV; n = 4), alcohol-induced liver disease (n = 2), and seronegative hepatitis (n = 1); 3 patients presented with acute liver failure. At LT, CD4 cell counts (T-helper cells that are targets for HIV) ranged from 124 to 500 cells/microL (mean 264), and HIV viral loads from <50 to 197,000 copies/mL. Nine of 12 patients were exposed to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) before LT. In the non-HCV group (n = 7), all patients are alive, all surviving more than 365 days (range 668-2,661 days). No patient has experienced HBV recurrence, and graft function is normal in all 7 patients. However, 5 of 7 HCV-infected patients died after LT at 95-784 days (median 161 days). A total of 4 patients died of complications due to recurrent HCV infection and sepsis, despite antiviral therapy in 3 of them. A total of 3 patients experienced complications relating to HAART therapy. In conclusion, outcome of LT in HIV-infected patients with HBV or other causes of chronic liver disease indicates that LT is an acceptable therapeutic option in selected patients. However, longer follow-up in larger series is required before a conclusive directive can be provided for HCV / HIV coinfected patients requiring LT.     

乙、丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植患者长期存活的影响

目的　了解乙型肝炎病毒（ＨＢＶ） 及丙型肝炎病毒（ＨＣＶ） 感染对肾移植患者长期存活的影响。方法　对８０ 例感染ＨＢＶ、ＨＣＶ 者肾移植术后肝病及排斥的发生情况、死亡原因及长期存活率进行分析。结果　移植后慢性肝病发生率为２１ ．２５％ , 死亡率为１８ ．７５ ％ , 显著高于非感染组（１ ．１９ ％ , Ｐ＜ ０．０１） ;ＨＣＶ 组超急性排斥及加速性排斥的发生率（６ ．０６％ ,９ ．０９ ％ ） 显著高于非感染组（０ ．７２ ％ ,２ ．７４ ％ ; Ｐ＜ ０ ．０１ , Ｐ＜ ０ ．０５）。结论　ＨＢＶ及ＨＣＶ感染显著影响肾移植受者的长期存活率; 移植后肝病及感染是其主要死因; 对ＨＢＶ 及ＨＣＶ 感染患者应采取合理的免疫抑制治疗。     

The natural history of hepatitis C virus in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Although rare in the pediatric population, the natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in pediatric patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV has not been well described. We performed an analysis of all 67 pediatric patients (< 17 years old) who have undergone OLT for HCV in the United States between 1/1988 and 6/2005. The 67 pediatric patients received a total of 83 OLTs for HCV. Following initial OLTs performed for HCV, the patient and allograft survival rates were 71.6% and 55.0%, respectively, at 5 years. Following retransplantation these rates decreased to 55.0% and 33.8%, respectively, following retransplantation. Recipients were listed for retransplantation after 31.3% of all OLTs, and overall recipients were retransplanted after 19.3% of OLTs. The overwhelming majority of retransplants were performed for HCV recurrence. A mean of 1.2 OLTs were performed per patient for HCV. The median time between OLTs for HCV was 290 days. In conclusion, the risk of HCV recurrence in pediatric OLT recipients is high and is associated with a high rate of retransplantation. Still, OLT represents the only treatment option that may achieve long-term survival in pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV that is recalcitrant to medical management.     

肝移植术后胆道并发症病因分析

目的探讨原位肝移植术后胆道并发症的病因.方法回顾性分析235例尸体供肝和36例活体供肝原位肝移植的临床资料,总结术后胆道并发症的病因.结果36例活体肝移植受体术后胆道并发症的发生率为5.6%,235例尸体供肝肝移植受体术后胆道并发症的发生率为19.1%;肝内胆道狭窄和胆道铸型结石形成等严重胆道并发症在活体肝移植中未发生.讨论缺血时间尤其热缺血时间是导致严重胆道并发症的最主要的原因,所留取的受体胆道长度也是影响胆道并发症的一个主要因素.     

Use of Grafts From Anti-HBc–Positive Donors in Liver Transplantation: A 5-Year,Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment of choice for advanced hepatic disease. The growing gap between waiting list patients and the number of donations has led to acceptance of less than optimal donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year experience with anti hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)–positive liver donors.

Patients and Methods

All recipients of anti-HBc–positive grafts from January 2005 to December 2010 were evaluated annually after OLT for liver disease etiology, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) liver biopsy histology and serology for hepatitis B virus (HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBV-DNA), hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis D virus as well as antiviral prophylaxis to prevent de novo HBV.

Results

Among the 249 OLT performed from January 2005 to December 2010, (9.3%) cases used grafts from anti-HBc–positive donors. Etiologics of liver disease among the recipients were HBV (n = 13; 32.5%), HCV (n = 13; 32.5%) or other causes (n = 14; 35%). In 20 of the 40 patients (50%), HCC was found in the explanted organ. Of 40 recipients of anti-HBc–positive grafts 11 died, and 7 (17.5%) required retransplantation. Various regimens were employed as post-transplantation antiviral prophylaxis: (l) Immune globulin (25.8%); (2) Oral antiviral drugs (9.7%); and (3) combined prophylaxis (51.6%) or no treatment (12.9%). No difference was observed in patient or graft survival in relation to the etiology of liver disease, the MELD score, or the presence of HCC at the time of OLT, except graft survival was significantly reduced among recipient who underwent transplantation for non-HBV or non-HCV liver diseases compared with those engrafted due to viral hepatitis (P = .0062). No difference was observed in histologic features (grading and staging) compared with the antiviral prophylactic therapy; the 2 patients (5%) who developed de novo HBV had not received prophylaxis after OLT.

Conclusions

Matching anti-HBc–positive grafts to recipients without HBV infection before OLT, may be especially safe.     

Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation

Eighteen liver transplant recipients were followed up for 10 years after a trial of immunosuppression withdrawal. Three groups were identified according to the early outcome of complete (group A, n = 5), partial (group B, n = 9), and unsuccessful (group C, n = 4) withdrawal of immunosuppression. The indications for liver transplantation (LT) (August 1983-December 1988) were as follows: primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 3), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 3), acute liver failure (n = 3), hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1), HCV and alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 1), cystic fibrosis (n = 1), and liver metastases from testicular teratoma (n = 1). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine. All patients experienced 1 or more complications of prolonged immunosuppression (median, 7 years; range, 5-11). Thirteen patients (72%) are alive at a median interval of 17 years (range, 16-21) after LT. Of the 5 patients in group A, 2 currently have normal graft function with no rejection episodes, and 3 have restarted immunosuppression following late low-grade acute rejection (n = 1), retransplantation for chronic rejection (n = 1), and kidney transplantation (n = 1). Of the 9 patients in group B, 5 died. The deaths were due to ruptured arterial pseudoaneurysm following retransplantation, HCC recurrence, cardiac failure, renal failure, and posttransplant lymphoma at 5, 7, 7, 14, and 17 years after LT, respectively. All 4 patients in group C are alive on a full immunosuppressive regimen. Long-term follow-up of 18 LT recipients withdrawn from immunosuppression has shown that at a median of 17 years 10% of patients remain off all immunosuppression.     

Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis B and C Virus-Related Cirrhosis: Mid-Term Results

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is almost universal; cirrhosis develops in up to 30% of cases. Currently there is interest in the midterm outcomes of HCV patients with concomitant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among OLT recipients. We therefore retrospectively analyzed our database of patients who underwent OLT for HCV-HBV-related cirrhosis. Between April 1992 and December 2008, 350 patients underwent OLT, including 20 (5.7%) transplanted for HBV-HCV cirrhosis. We assessed patient and graft survivals at 1 and 5 years, as well as the progression of fibrosis. Protocol liver biopsies were available yearly after OLT. The survival curves were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier approach and chronic hepatitis evaluated according to the Ishak scoring system. At a median follow-up of 68.4 ± 53 months, the 1- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 80% and 70%, respectively. The 5-year fibrosis progression rate was 0.17 ± 0.08 units of fibrosis. The only patient who developed histologic cirrhosis within 10 years of follow-up showed a lamivudine-resistant HBV recurrence. Patients transplanted for HBV-HCV coinfection showed a lower fibrosis progression rate compared with HCV monoinfected subjects.     

Liver transplantation using donors older than 80 years: a single-center experience

AIM: The shortage of organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has forced transplantation centers to expand the donor pool by using donors traditionally labeled as "extended criteria donors." One such example is OLT using a donor with advanced age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients who received a liver graft from cadaveric donors older than 80 years. We analyzed pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics, as well as the evolution of the recipients. RESULTS: All 10 donors were older than 80 years (median age, 83.5; range, 80-93). No steatosis (>30%) was accepted in the older donor group. Medium follow-up was 19.5 months. The most frequent cause for OLT was hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (8/10 patients). We had 1 case of primary nonfunction, 1 patient died immediately after surgery because of extrahepatic complications (cardiac arrest), and 2 other patients had a severe HCV recurrence and died after 1 and 2 years from OLT, respectively. Five patients had HCV recurrence and biliary complications were present in 60% of the patients. No cases of acute or chronic rejection were described. Overall survival rates after 1 and 3 years were 80% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Old donor age is not an absolute contraindication to OLT. Liver grafts from donors older than 80 years can be used knowing that there is a high risk of postoperative complications. Furthermore, the increased risk of developing severe HCV recurrence, related to older donor age, suggests that such livers should be used in HCV-negative recipients.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者存活的影响

目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和(或)丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响及预防措施。方法 HBV和(或)HCV感染肾移植受者110例(感染组),其中HBV感染受者56例、HCV感染受者52例,HBV与HCV合并感染2例。非HBV与非HCV感染受者694例(非感染组)。感染组受者术前有病毒复制者予积极治疗,研究早期肝功能正常者可接受肾移植,后期均用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,要求连续3～6个月HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)0copy/ml,HCV核糖核酸(RNA)0copy/ml方可接受肾移植。术后定期检测HBV与HCV,定期检测感染组受者HBVDNA滴度、HCVRNA滴度。发现HBV复制,选用拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯治疗,酌情减少免疫抑制剂用量。分别比较两组术后1、3、5年人、肾存活率,比较两组的肝功能衰竭病死率。结果非感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年94.2%、91.4%,3年为86.4%、85.2%,5年为82.7%、78.9%;感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年90.2%、88.1%,3年为88.9%、86.2%,5年为81.5%、76.3%;两组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。感染组中14例(12.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,其中10例为HBV感染者,非感染组受者无1例死于肝衰竭。感染组术后肝衰竭病死率明显高于非感染组(12.7%、0,P<0.05)。结论受者术前HBV和(或)HCV感染会明显增加肾移植术后肝衰竭死亡危险。患者术前处于病毒复制期应予积极治疗,在肝炎病毒停止复制6个月后再考虑肾移植。长期随访中应定期复查HBV与HCV感染指标,早确诊、早治疗,并及时调整免疫抑制剂剂量。     

Clinical and Virologic Outcomes of Hepatitis B and C Viral Coinfection After Liver Transplantation: Effect of Viral Hepatitis D

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C viral (HCV) dual-infection-associated liver disease is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation. The clinical and virologic outcomes in such patients have not been well studied. We retrospectively studied 13 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV positivity who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and survived at least 30 days post-OLT Antibody to hepatitis delta virus (HDV) was negative in 8 patients (group I) and positive in 5 patients (group 11). Eleven of the 13 patients received standard hepatitis B immune prophylaxis, and they all remained HBsAg negative. All group I patients were HCV RNA positive after transplantation; in contrast, all group II patients were HCV RNA negative. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels were elevated in 88% (7 of 8) of the patients in group I compared with 20% (1 of 5 patients) in group II. None of the patients had graft loss from chronic rejection or recurrent hepatitis. Three patients had unsuspected hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant. We conclude that among liver transplant recipients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HDV infection is associated with the suppression of HCV replication and mild inflammatory activity after OLT     

Cost-effectiveness of cadaveric and living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric liver transplantation (5-year survival >80%) represents the standard of care for end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Because the demand for cadaveric organs exceeds their availability, living-donor liver transplantation has gained increasing acceptance. Our aim was to assess the marginal cost-effectiveness of cadaveric and living-donor orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in adults with ESLD. METHODS: Using a Markov model, outcomes and costs of ESLD treated (1) conservatively, (2) with cadaveric OLT alone, and (3) with cadaveric OLT or living-donor OLT were computed. The model was validated with published data. The case-based scenario consisted of data on all 15 ESLD patients currently on our waiting list (3 women, 12 men; median age, 48 years [range, 33-59 years]) and on the outcome of all OLT performed for ESLD at our institution since 1995 (n=51; actuarial 5-year survival 93%). Living-donor OLT was allowed in 15% during the first year of listing; fulminant hepatic failure and hepatocellular carcinoma were excluded. RESULTS: Cadaveric OLT gained on average 6.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient compared with conservative treatment, living-donor OLT, an additional 1.3 QALYs compared with cadaveric OLT alone. Marginal cost-effectiveness of a program with cadaveric OLT alone and a program with cadaveric and living-donor OLT combined were similar (E 22,451 and E 23,530 per QALY gained). Results were sensitive to recipient age and postoperative survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Offering living-donor OLT in addition to cadaveric OLT improves survival at costs comparable to accepted therapies in medicine. Cadaveric OLT and living-donor OLT are cost-effective.     

Impact of the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation on the long-term viability of the graft.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) on graft viability is still not accurately defined. Our study aims to evaluate the magnitude and rate of progression of HCV-induced liver damage after OLT in a single institution cohort of 122 HCV-infected recipients. METHODS: All patients transplanted at our institution between 1988 and 1996 with positive serum HCV antibodies before OLT, minimum postoperative survival of 6 months, and without hepatitis B virus coinfection or severe non-HCV-related graft complications were retrospectively included in the study. RESULTS: HCV infection recurrence was almost universal, and genotype 1b was observed in 87% of the cases. After a median histological follow-up of 43 months (range: 7-96), evidences of HCV-induced histological damage were found in 94% of the cases. The actuarial rates of severe graft damage (including cirrhosis, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and submassive liver necrosis) were 15%, 33%, and 44% at 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively, and among these patients, 52% developed decompensated liver disease during the follow-up and 36% lost their grafts. The biochemical severity at the onset of the recurrent hepatitis and the development of cholestasis or cytomegalovirus disease were independent predictors of severe HCV-related graft damage. No differences were found in graft and patient survival when positive-HCV OLT recipients were compared with a coetaneous cohort of 215 non-HCV OLT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection recurrence leads to severe liver damage and subsequently to clinical decompensation in a significant proportion of OLT recipients. Some clinical and biochemical characteristics can predict the severity of HCV-induced graft damage.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响

对乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原阳性与丙型肝炎病毒抗体阳性的肾移植患者慢性肝脏疾病的发病情况进行研究，以探讨肝炎病毒感染对肾移植患者的患乾。结果表明，ＨＢｓＡｇ阳性或ＨＣＶ抗体阳性患者慢性直脏疾病的发病率明显高于阴性患者，但其对人／肾１年存活率的影响不显著；     

Retrospective-prospective study of safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals in HIV/HCV-coinfected participants with decompensated liver disease pre– or post–liver transplant

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) coinfected patients with advanced liver disease. STOP-Coinfection was a multicenter prospective and retrospective, open-label study using sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy to treat HIV/HCV-coinfected participants pre– or post–liver transplant (LT). Sixty-eight participants with end-stage liver disease (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥7 and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score 6–29) were enrolled, 26 had hepatocellular carcinoma. Forty-two participants were treated pre–LT and 26 post–LT. All participants completed therapy without need for dose reduction or transfusion; eight required two or more courses of therapy. Ninety-three percent achieved a sustained virologic response and DAA therapy was well tolerated. Despite HCV cure, 12 end-stage liver disease participants required subsequent LT, 7 for decompensated liver disease. Thirteen participants died, 10 with decompensated liver disease pre–LT and three post–LT. Overall, transplant free survival was 42.8% at 4 years and post–LT survival was 87.9% at 5 years. We conclude that sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy is safe and highly effective in HCV-HIV patients with decompensated liver disease and post–LT, with post–LT survival rates comparable to other indications. This removes one of the last barriers to liver transplantation in this challenging cohort of recipients.     

The use of extracorporeal photopheresis for allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Originally introduced for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven effective to reverse allograft rejection. The aim of the present work was to show the results of a single-center experience with ECP for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection in selected liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of five LT patients (M:F=4:1; median age 51 years) undergoing ECP for biopsy-proven allograft rejection between January 1996 and December 2003. In this period 476 LT were performed on 441 patients. RESULTS: The indications for LT were three cases of HCV-related cirrhosis, complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma in two; one HBV-HDV-alcoholic cirrhosis; and one fulminant HBV hepatitis. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression with induction using anti-IL2R monoclonal antibodies. Indications for ECP were: ductopenic rejection in one patient with HCV recurrence; steroid-resistant acute rejection in two; acute rejection in a major ABO-mismatched liver graft; and one acute rejection in a patient with a proven allergy to steroids. The median interval from LT to inception of ECP was 43 days. The median number of ECP sessions per patient was 20. During the course of ECP, two patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia, associated in one case with bacterial pneumonia. All patients tolerated ECP and there were no procedure-related complications. At a median follow-up of 7.9 months after start of ECP, neither rejection relapses nor HCV/HBV recurrences have been observed. Three patients are off ECP with complete reversal and low-dose immunosuppression. Two patients are still receiving ECP with full-dose immunosuppression: one has achieved normal liver function but ECP is indicated due to a major ABO-incompatible liver graft, while the other patient's liver functions have not yet returned to baseline values.     

Experience of a successful pediatric liver transplant program in Mexico

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been very difficult to develop in Mexico and for many years its occurrence was anecdotal. This report presents the results of a pediatric liver transplant program, analyzing the variables that affect outcomes. Between June 1998 and March 2004, 35 OLT were performed in 34 recipients including 80% cadaveric whole-organ grafts and 20% segmental grafts, with 11% from cadaveric and 9% from living donors. Most of the recipients were infants or toddlers weighing less than 15 kg. There was only 1 case of arterial thrombosis (2.8%); the graft was saved with a Kasai procedure. Biliary complications were present in 22% of cases, all resolved with reoperations. Posttransplant cytomegalovirus infection or reactivation (28%), acute rejection (25%), or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (5.7%) were not a cause of graft or patient loss. Overall, 1- and 5-year patient survival rates are 77.1% and 74.2%, respectively; however, when the 1998-2000 cohort was compared with the 2001-2004 cohort, there was a significant difference in survival (P = .004). The 1-year patient survival for the later group is 91.6%. We performed the first successful living donor liver transplantation and the first simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in a child in our country. Our results demonstrate that pediatric liver transplantation is a feasible undertaking in Mexico, with survival rates comparable to those of foreign centers.     

Predictors of survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Hepatitis C.

The efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not well defined. This study examines the variables that may determine the outcome of OLT for HCC in HCV patients. From 1990 to 1999, 463 OLTs were performed for HCV cirrhosis. Of these patients, 67 with concurrent HCC were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses considered the following variables: gender, pTNM stage, tumor size, number of nodules, vascular invasion, incidental tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative chemoembolization, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) tumor marker, lobar distribution, and histological grade. Overall OLT survival of HCV patients diagnosed with concomitant HCC was significantly lower when compared to patients who underwent OLT for HCV alone at 1, 3, and 5 years (75%, 71%, and 55% versus 84%, 76%, and 75%, respectively; P < 0.01). Overall survival of patients with stage I HCC was significantly better than patients with stage II, III, or IV (P < .05). Eleven of 67 patients developed tumor recurrence. Sites of recurrence included transplanted liver (5), lung (5), and bone (1). Twenty-four of 67 patients (36%) died during the follow-up time. Causes of deaths included recurrent HCC in 8 of 24 patients (12%) and recurrent HCV in 3 of 24 patients (4.5%), whereas 13 (19.5%) patients died from causes that were unrelated to HCV or HCC. Both univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that pTNM status (I versus II, III, and IV; P < .05) was a reliable prognostic indicator for patient survival. Presence of vascular invasion (P = .0001) and advanced pTNM staging (P = .038) increased risk of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant chemoembolization and adjuvant chemotherapy reduced risk of death after OLT in HCC recipients. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of OLT for patients with HCC in a large cohort of chronic HCV patients. Advanced tumor stage, and particularly vascular invasion, are poor prognostic indicators for tumor recurrence. Early pTNM stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative chemoembolization were associated with positive outcomes for patients who underwent OLT for concomitant HCV and HCC.     

Necrosis percentage of radiologically treated hepatocellular carcinoma at hepatectomy for liver transplantation

Among a cohort of 414 liver transplantations (OLT) performed form 1996 to 2009, we analyzed 86 patients (20.7%) who were affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) superimposed on cirrhosis, including 82 with a preoperative diagnosis of tumor; 4 cases had the diagnosis established upon histologic examination after hepatectomy. The gender of 75 patients was male (91.5%), and female in 7 cases (8.5%). The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 10 (range, 6-23). The underlying liver disease was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis (41.46%), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis (15.6%), or alcohol-related cirrhosis (29.3%); cryptogenic; HCV+HIV; HBV+HIV; or HCV+HBV+HIV cirrhosis were present in an other few patients. The diagnosis of HCC and the preoperative staging were defined through radiologic evaluations, without biopsy confirmation in any case. All patients underwent pretransplant radiologic treatments to reduce the drop-out risk while a waiting OLT; OLT was performed for HCC patients within the Milan criteria. Upon histologic examination, the median HCC necrosis was 57 ± 36%; in 22 cases (26.8%), there were no necrotizing effects. Forty patients (48.8%) display a satisfying degree of disease control with 26 patients (31.7%) downstaged effect; 15 patients (18.3%) showed neoplastic progression with advanced neoplastic disease exceeding the Milan criteria at hepatectomy. One patient had nonevaluable necrosis (1.2%). Our experience showed preoperative radiologic treatments to be not curative but serving as a bridge to OLT.     

Outcomes of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients because of reportedly poor outcomes. This prospective, multicenter US cohort study compared patient and graft survival for 89 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients and 2 control groups: 235 HCV-monoinfected LT controls and all US transplant recipients who were 65 years old or older. The 3-year patient and graft survival rates were 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47%-71%] and 53% (95% CI = 40%-64%) for the HCV/HIV patients and 79% (95% CI = 72%-84%) and 74% (95% CI = 66%-79%) for the HCV-infected recipients (P < 0.001 for both), and HIV infection was the only factor significantly associated with reduced patient and graft survival. Among the HCV/HIV patients, older donor age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3 per decade], combined kidney-liver transplantation (HR = 3.8), an anti-HCV-positive donor (HR = 2.5), and a body mass index < 21 kg/m(2) (HR = 3.2) were independent predictors of graft loss. For the patients without the last 3 factors, the patient and graft survival rates were similar to those for US LT recipients. The 3-year incidence of treated acute rejection was 1.6-fold higher for the HCV/HIV patients versus the HCV patients (39% versus 24%, log rank P = 0.02), but the cumulative rates of severe HCV disease at 3 years were not significantly different (29% versus 23%, P = 0.21). In conclusion, patient and graft survival rates are lower for HCV/HIV-coinfected LT patients versus HCV-monoinfected LT patients. Importantly, the rates of treated acute rejection (but not the rates of HCV disease severity) are significantly higher for HCV/HIV-coinfected recipients versus HCV-infected recipients. Our results indicate that HCV per se is not a contraindication to LT in HIV patients, but recipient and donor selection and the management of acute rejection strongly influence outcomes.