Twelve months of lamivudine treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection increases morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Lamivudine has shown promising results in patients with chronic hepatitis B, but experience with its use in RTR is limited. METHODS: In a prospective, open labeled, uncontrolled trial, 19 HBsAg(+) RTR were treated with lamivudine for 12 months. HBV-serologic analysis, HBV-DNA quantitation, and HBV genome sequence analysis were performed every 3 months. RESULTS: At baseline 16 patients were HBV DNA(+), 12 patients were HBeAg(+)/Ab (-). After 3 months HBV DNA was negative in 80% of patients. In the 3 patients with elevated liver enzymes, normal values were achieved within 12 weeks. At 12 months 4 of 8 HBeAg(+)/Ab(-) patients on treatment showed HBeAb, two of them with loss of HBeAg. Three patients developed mutations of the HBV polymerase gene associated with lamivudine resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine is safe and effective in HB-sAg(+) RTR, the rate of HBe-seroconversion and of lamivudine-resistance is comparable to that of nonimmunosuppressed patients.     

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients

Although in Western Europe and North America the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in patients awaiting renal transplantation, it remains a relevant clinical problem, mainly in patients with a long history of renal replacement therapy (RRT) who may have been infected many years ago. At the same time, a significant proportion of renal transplant recipients (RTR) is at risk for HBV infection in areas with endemic HBV. HBV infection may increase morbidity and mortality in RTR. The majority of long-term studies reported reduced patient survival compared with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative RTR. The risk for morbidity and mortality of HBsAg-positive RTR transplantation is probably related to the extent of pretransplant liver disease. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy in many patients, is required to assess the individual HBsAg-positive patient's risk-benefit ratio. The influence of immunosuppressive therapy on HBV replication and HBV-associated complications is not well established and for clinical practice individually tailored immunosuppression is recommended in HBsAg-positive RTR. Careful screening for HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive RTR and a regular clinical follow-up after renal transplantation (RTX) including liver sonography is required for early detection of HBV-associated complications. With the availability of new antiviral drugs, new options for pre- and posttransplant therapy might improve the prognosis of RTR with chronic HBV infection.     

Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Limited efficacy of lamivudine against hepatitis B virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major complication when HBV carriers receive immunosuppressive therapy. Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) carry the highest risk of fatal HBV disease (up to 12%). METHODS: In an attempt to identify a suitable procedure for the prevention and management of HBV reactivation, the administration of lamivudine over the course was tested in two patients. RESULTS: Generally, the patients transplant courses were successfully managed despite their difficult clinical situations: a high HBV load before transplant in one patient and intense steroid therapy for complicated acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the other patient. However, one patient showed a reactivation of HBV after discontinuing lamivudine and the other showed persistently high DNA polymerase activity despite prolonged administration of lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that lamivudine could have a place in the management of patients who suffer from chronic HBV infection and who are undergoing allogeneic HSCT. However, the efficacy of lamivudine seemed to be limited compared with other settings, including solid organ transplantation and autologous HSCT.     

Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in renal transplant recipients

To evaluate the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in renal transplant recipients, we administered three 40-microgram doses of vaccine to 17 patients who had previously undergone transplantation and were on immunosuppressive therapy. Life-table analysis revealed a cumulative antibody response rate of only 17.6% at 12 months, and the three responders had low titers of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. There were no serious adverse effects and no episodes of graft rejection in responders or nonresponders. In addition, the ratio of helper/inducer (T4) to suppressor/cytotoxic (T8) T cells in vaccinees bore no relationship to the immunogenicity of the vaccine. These data indicate that hepatitis B vaccine is weakly immunogenic in renal transplant recipients and illustrate the need for vaccination prior to transplantation for maximal protection against hepatitis B virus infection.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者存活的影响

目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和(或)丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响及预防措施。方法 HBV和(或)HCV感染肾移植受者110例(感染组),其中HBV感染受者56例、HCV感染受者52例,HBV与HCV合并感染2例。非HBV与非HCV感染受者694例(非感染组)。感染组受者术前有病毒复制者予积极治疗,研究早期肝功能正常者可接受肾移植,后期均用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,要求连续3～6个月HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)0copy/ml,HCV核糖核酸(RNA)0copy/ml方可接受肾移植。术后定期检测HBV与HCV,定期检测感染组受者HBVDNA滴度、HCVRNA滴度。发现HBV复制,选用拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯治疗,酌情减少免疫抑制剂用量。分别比较两组术后1、3、5年人、肾存活率,比较两组的肝功能衰竭病死率。结果非感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年94.2%、91.4%,3年为86.4%、85.2%,5年为82.7%、78.9%;感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年90.2%、88.1%,3年为88.9%、86.2%,5年为81.5%、76.3%;两组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。感染组中14例(12.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,其中10例为HBV感染者,非感染组受者无1例死于肝衰竭。感染组术后肝衰竭病死率明显高于非感染组(12.7%、0,P<0.05)。结论受者术前HBV和(或)HCV感染会明显增加肾移植术后肝衰竭死亡危险。患者术前处于病毒复制期应予积极治疗,在肝炎病毒停止复制6个月后再考虑肾移植。长期随访中应定期复查HBV与HCV感染指标,早确诊、早治疗,并及时调整免疫抑制剂剂量。     

Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant recipients.

Non-A, non-B hepatitis is a significant cause of liver disease among renal allograft recipients. In order to assess the impact and prevalence of hepatitis C in a series of renal allograft recipients, we retrospectively screened 621 consecutive patients transplanted between 1979 and 1989 and 484 cadaver organ donors retrieved in the same interval for serologic evidence of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection using the enzyme-linked assay for anti-HCV antibody. Of 596 HBsAg negative patients, 180 (30%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplant. One-year posttransplant, 117 (22%) had detectable levels of anti-HCV antibody. Chemically significant hepatitis developed in 52/234 (22%) anti-HCV positive patients, and 26 of these followed a clinical course consistent with chronic hepatitis. Significantly more males and patients with antibody to HCV detectable at 1 year posttransplant were in the group experiencing an increase in liver enzymes. Ten-year patient and graft survival was 78% and 50%, respectively, for the anti-HCV positive patients who had an elevation of alanine aminotransferase, and 76% and 57% for the cohort maintaining normal liver function (P = NS). There were also no differences in patient and graft survival among the anti-HCV positive group and the consistently sero-negative patients. Of 484 cadaver organ donors with serum available for analysis (out of 1200 retrieved), 67 (14%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of organ donation. Among 23 anti-HCV negative kidney recipients who received a kidney from an HCV antibody positive donor, only one had seroconverted at 1 year posttransplant. Antibody to HCV appears to be widespread among renal transplant recipients and cadaver organ donors. We were unable to demonstrate any evidence of long-term adverse effects on patient and graft survival among anti-HCV positive patients employing the first generation anti-HCV assay.     

Clinical course of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients

Patients with end-stage renal disease are at high risk for exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although both viral replication and liver disease progression are accelerated after renal transplantation, the long-term impact of chronic HCV infection is unclear. Our aim was to analyze the course of HCV infection in renal transplant recipients and the effects of HCV reactivation on patient and graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the 21-year (1985-2006) data of 1274 renal transplant recipients, 43 of whom were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The mean posttransplant follow-up of 43 patients was 62.0 +/- 7.3 months. At the time of transplantation, HCV RNA was positive in 11 (25.6%) patients and negative in 32 (74.4%) patients. HCV reactivation was seen in 19 (45.2%) patients at a mean time of 20.8 +/- 5.7 months. In 31 (72%) patients, acute rejection occurred, whereas graft loss occurred in 10 (23%) patients. Three (7%) patients died. Among 43 patients, 22 (51.2%) were treated with interferon before transplantation. There was a statistically significant association between pretransplant interferon therapy and pretransplant HCVRNA level (P=.024), but no significant association of HCV reactivation and graft rejection, mortality, or kidney survival. CONCLUSION: HCV reactivation occurred in nearly half of the renal transplant recipients, mostly in the second year. Patient survival and graft survival were not affected by HCV reactivation. Anti-HCV positivity should not preclude chronic renal failure patients from renal transplantation.     

Durability of the hepatitis B vaccination in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine implementation, HBV infection has significantly decreased. However, adult renal transplant recipients show a higher rate of seroreversion compared to the general population, leading to HBV infection risk. Data are limited in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Retrospective data were collected to determine the seroprotection and durability of HBV vaccination in pediatric renal transplant patients from 2004 to 2014. One hundred subjects were categorized based on pre‐ and post‐transplant hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). Pretransplant, 85 recipients (85%) had a positive HBsAb compared to 15 (15%) with negative HBsAb. In univariable analyses, other than age (P < .05) no significant differences existed pretransplant by demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, or number of vaccinations. Of the 85 pretransplantation responders, 53 (62%) remained HBsAb positive post‐transplantation, 28 (32%) seroreverted, and 4 developed indeterminate titers. All seroreversions occurred within 5 years post‐transplant. Receipt of a living donor organ had higher risk of reversion (P = .005). No significant differences were found in demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, vaccination number, or acute rejection. Despite vaccination, 15% of pediatric renal transplant candidates were seronegative, and an additional 32% lost seroprotection within 5 years post‐transplantation leaving nearly half of transplant recipients at risk for HBV infection.     

Cadaveric renal transplantation in hepatitis B antigen-positive recipients using hepatitis B antigen-positive donor organs with lamivudine treatment

Although renal transplantation has been regarded as the best renal replacement therapy in end-stage renal disease patients, there have never been enough organ donors. Therefore, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients are often given priority over HBsAg-positive patients. We performed cadaveric renal transplantation in six HBsAg-positive recipients given HBsAg-positive donor organs who were on lamivudine treatment. Donors were found to have normal renal function by serum and urine laboratory tests. All recipients underwent liver biopsies before transplantation; those with liver cirrhosis were excluded. All recipients were treated with 100 mg lamivudine once daily because of positive titers of hepatitis B viral (HBV) DNA (three patients), and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (three patients). During the follow-up period, one patient died from hepatic failure at 50 months after transplantation without deterioration of graft function. The remaining five patients showed sustained normal ALT levels. Decreases in HBV DNA titer were observed among patients who were positive before transplantation, but did not reverse to negative. Acute rejection developed in two patients: one was treated successfully with steroid pulse therapy, and the other had two bouts of acute rejection within a 33-month interval. The first was successfully treated with steroid pulse therapy, but the second failed. The four remaining patients have maintained normal renal function for a considerable time. HBsAg-positive donor organs must be used carefully in renal transplantation of HBsAg-positive recipients.     

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) has been described as a specific manifestation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in liver allograft recipients characterized by a rapid progression to liver failure. Only sporadic cases have been reported in other immunocompromised groups infected with HBV and in a few transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We present the occurrence of FCH in 4 HCV-infected renal transplant recipients within a series of 73 renal transplant recipients with HCV infection followed up closely serologically and with consecutive liver biopsies. All 4 patients received the triple-immunosuppressive regimen (azathioprine, cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone). The interval from transplantation to the appearance of liver dysfunction was 1 to 4 months and to histological diagnosis, 3 to 11 months. The biochemical profile was analogous to a progressive cholestatic syndrome in 3 patients, whereas the fourth patient had only slightly increased alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT) levels. Liver histological examination showed the characteristic pattern of FCH in 2 patients, whereas the other 2 patients had changes compatible with an early stage. All patients were anti-HCV negative at the time of transplantation, whereas 2 patients, 1 with incomplete and 1with complete histological FCH features, seroconverted after 3 and 31 months, respectively. The patients were HCV RNA positive at the time of the first liver biopsy and showed high serum HCV RNA levels (14 to 58 x 10(6) Eq/mL, branched DNA). HCV genotype was 1b in 3 patients and 3a in 1 patient. After histological diagnosis, immunosuppression was drastically reduced. Two patients died of sepsis and liver failure 16 and 18 months posttransplantation, whereas the seroconverted patients showed marked improvement of their liver disease, which was histologically verified in 1 patient. In conclusion, FCH can occur in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients. It seems to develop as a complication of a recent HCV infection during the period of maximal immunosuppression and is associated with high HCV viremia levels. There are indications that drastic reduction of immunosuppression may have a beneficial effect on the outcome of the disease.     

血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性肾移植患者临床用药特点

目的 探讨血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性。肾移植患者术后临床用药特点。方法 40例同种异体。肾移植患者，男22例，女18例。年龄30～56岁。其中乙型肝炎感染29例、丙型肝炎感染9例、乙型肝炎合并丙型肝炎感染2例。患者肝功能正常，随机分为普乐可复组（n=20），环孢素A组（n=20）。观察患者术后肝、肾功能情况及人／。肾存活率。结果 40例患者术后随访2年，普乐可复组肝功能异常发生率、急性排斥反应发生率明显低于环孢素A组（分别为15％vs30％，5％vs20％），2组2年人／肾存活率均为100％。结论 血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性患者接受肾移植术后首选普乐可复作为基础免疫制剂方案，可减少排斥反应发生率，对肝脏的损害程度轻。