Suicide and epilepsy: do antiepileptic drugs increase the risk?

Introduction: Years after the US FDA issued an alert on an increased risk of suicide ideation and behavior in people with epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), this issue still remains controversial. The FDA alert was based on a meta-analysis of clinical trials of AEDs in all indications.

Areas covered: We discuss major methodological problems of this meta-analysis. Available evidence coming from the published studies is also discussed highlighting that the majority of them are also affected by major methodological limitations, which do not allow an absolute conclusion.

Expert opinion: Suicide in epilepsy is a complex phenomenon but most agree that suicide rates are higher in people with epilepsy when compared to the general population. Screening for suicide seems to be appropriate and well-designed prospective studies are urgently needed in order to clarify fully a possible role of AEDs.     

Michaelis-menten absorption kinetics in drugs: — Examples and implications

Summary It is shown that the absorption of phenylbutazone, naproxen, and chlorthiazide is governed by a dose limiting mechanism. This dose dependency may be explained by a saturation absorption process mathematically obeying Michaelis-Menten type kinetics. Observed dose relationships for tetracycline, fenclozic acid and related compounds, phenytoin, and possibly digoxin and digitoxin may be explained if a saturable process in absorption is postulated. This behavior may be produced by insolubility of the drug compound, a limited window of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract, or a capacity limited absorption because of the carrier or the transport mechanism involved. The need for suitably designed dose response studies with new drug compounds is discussed.     

Do ATP-binding cassette transporters cause pharmacoresistance in epilepsy? Problems and approaches in determining which antiepileptic drugs are affected

Resistance to multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a common problem in epilepsy, affecting at least 30% of patients. One prominent hypothesis to explain this resistance suggests an inadequate penetration or excess efflux of AEDs across the blood - brain barrier (BBB) as a result of overexpressed efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp), the encoded product of the multidrug resistance- 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) gene. Pgp and MDR1 are markedly increased in epileptogenic brain tissue of patients with AED-resistant partial epilepsy and following seizures in rodent models of partial epilepsy. In rodent models, AED-resistant rats exhibit higher Pgp levels than responsive animals; increased Pgp expression is associated with lower brain levels of AEDs; and, most importantly, co-administration of Pgp inhibitors reverses AED resistance. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that Pgp plays a significant role in mediating resistance to AEDs in rodent models of epilepsy - however, whether this phenomenon extends to at least some human refractory epilepsy remains unclear, particularly because it is still a matter of debate which AEDs, if any, are transported by human Pgp. The difficulty in determining which AEDs are substrates of human Pgp is mainly a consequence of the fact that AEDs are highly permeable compounds, which are not easily identified as Pgp substrates in in vitro models of the BBB, such as monolayer (Transwell(?)) efflux assays. By using a modified assay (concentration equilibrium transport assay; CETA), which minimizes the influence of high transcellular permeability, two groups have recently demonstrated that several major AEDs are transported by human Pgp. Importantly, it was demonstrated in these studies that Pgp-mediated transport highly depends on the AED concentration and may not be identified if concentrations below or above the therapeutic range are used. In addition to the efflux transporters, seizure-induced alterations in BBB integrity and activity of drug metabolizing enzymes (CYPs) affect the brain uptake of AEDs. For translating these findings to the clinical arena, in vivo imaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) with (11)C-labelled AEDs in epileptic patients are under way.     

Statistical modeling of dose-response relationships in clinical trials— a case study

This paper presents a model-based assessment of the relationship between the dose of a test treatment and response. The data set used in the analysis describes the results of two clinical trials that were designed to assess the dose-response relationship of a test treatment. The models described in the paper are fit using weighted regression as implemented by the SAS procedure CATMOD. Relationships between weighted regression and other similar procedures are discussed.     

Genetic variability of pain perception and treatment—clinical pharmacological implications

Evidence of a genetic control of pain has led to efforts to exploit genotyping information from pain patients for the development of analgesics and for the selection of pharmacological approaches to pain. Research on translating the genetic bases of familial insensitivity to pain has contributed to the discovery of crucial molecular pathways of pain and to the identification of new analgesic targets (e.g., the Na_v1.7 sodium channel, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptors, nerve growth factor). Moreover, human genetic variants leading to enhanced or reduced function of specific molecular pathways are employed as substitutes for the lack of modulator molecules usable in humans, enabling nociceptive or anti-nociceptive pathways in humans to be studied before drug development. Translational approaches have also been used to verify the importance of experimentally discovered pain pathways in humans, such as GTP cyclohydrolase 1 and the potassium channel K_v9.1. In addition to these uses of genetics as a research tool, an individualized pharmacological therapy based on the patient’s genotype has been attempted. In terms of analgesics in clinical use, such an approach is at the present time only marginally available. For future analgesic targeting, for example, Na_v1.7 or TRPA1, the genotype may be the target of a selective cure for syndromes caused by increased-function mutations in the coding genes. The consideration of human genetics in drug studies may accelerate analgesic drug development while reducing cost because the clinical success may be partly anticipated by including information of functional genetic variants that mimic the action of future analgesics. These developments show that genotyping information obtained from studies on pain patients plays a role in the clinical pharmacology of pain.     

Prescription of anti-osteoporosis drugs during 2004–2007—a nationwide register study in Norway

Purpose  

To assess 1-year prevalence, incidence rates and minimum refill of anti-osteoporosis drug use in Norway by age, gender and place of residence during 2004–2007.     

Is nitric oxide involved in the anticonvulsant action of antiepileptic drugs?

Experimental data indicate that nitric oxide (NO) may play a role in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. It is also possible that NO-mediated events are involved in the expression of the anticonvulsant action of some antiepileptics. The aim of this review was to assemble current literature data on the role of NO in the anticonvulsant action of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The influence of various NO synthase inhibitors (NOSI) on antiseizure activity of AEDs was tested in many animal experimental models of epilepsy (electrically and pharmacologically evoked seizures, sound-induced convulsions, amygdala-kindled seizures). Although some NOSI were able to modify the anticonvulsive properties of AEDs, the involvement of NO pathway in the mechanisms of action of AEDs in most cases does not seem probable, since the effects of NOSI were not reversed by L-arginine, a NO precursor.     

Clinical pharmacology: drugs as a benefit and/or risk in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy?

Death may be the consequence of natural or unnatural causes, such as accidents, homicide, and suicide, which have no relationship to the disease of epilepsy. Direct causes of death include status epilepticus, and indirect causes may be head trauma or drowning subsequent to a seizure. When death occurs suddenly and without explanation, the term sudden unexpected unexplained death is used. Unexplained is a term that clinicians and research scientists are working to clarify. Numerous preclinical animal studies have been conducted as models for sudden death and have led to clinical studies in persons with epilepsy. These studies show that sympathetic nerve stimulation, ouabain, or coronary occlusion increased temporal dispersion of recovery of ventricular excitability and led to an underlying electrical instability that predisposed the ventricularmyocardium to arrhythmia. Cardiac arrhythmias in an animal model for ouabain-induced toxicity were associated with neural autonomic dysfunction. Neural discharges were characterized by increases, decreases, or no change in the discharge of postganglionic cardiac sympathetic nerves monitored simultaneously, predisposing to cardiac arrhythmia. Stimulation of the sympathetic ventrolateral cardiac nerve produced a shift in the origin of the pacemaker and tachyarrhythmias because the nerve is not uniformly distributed to the various regions of the heart but is localized to the atrioventricular junctional and ventricular regions. Such nonuniform distribution of sympathetic nerves would also contribute to initiation of arrhythmia as a nonuniform neural discharge occurred. Studies examining the physiology and pharmacology of this finding in multiple animal models found that subconvulsant, interictal discharge was associated with autonomic cardiac neural non-uniform discharge and cardiac arrhythmias. As a result of further investigations, Lathers and Schraeder edited a book in 1990 that summarized the clinical problem of sudden unexpected death and epilepsy (SUDEP). The contributors concluded that there was a paucity of clinical data addressing the mechanism of death. Regulatory response resulting from the consequent increased awareness of SUDEP occurred in 1993, when the FDA focused attention of practitioners and pharmaceutical manufacturers on the question of whether use of anticonvulsant drugs contributes to or prevents sudden unexpected death in epileptic persons. The FDA-convened panel of scientists considered the prevalence of sudden unexpected death in patients involved in studies associated with developing new anticonvulsant drugs and reviewed data on the risk of sudden unexpected death in patients taking lamotrigine. The risk of SUDEP was no different from thatfound in the young epilepsy population in general. Estimated SUDEP rates in patients receiving the new anticonvulsant drugs lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tigabine, and zonisamide were found to be similar to those in patients receiving standard anticonvulsant drugs, suggesting that SUDEP rates reflect population rates and not a specific drug effect. The FDA required warning labels on the risk of SUDEP in association with the use of each of the above-mentioned drugs. Another effect of bringing SUDEP to the attention of epilepsy researchers has been the expansion of basic science and the development of epidemiological and clinical studies directed at this phenomenon. Results from some of these studies are discussed in this article.     

Therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and in the postpartum period: is it useful?

As in all patient populations, epilepsy is common in pregnant women. Consequently, approximately 1 in 200 pregnancies is exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Although exposure to AEDs in utero has been associated with an increased risk of major fetal malformations, most women with epilepsy require medication throughout pregnancy, since seizures themselves may be potentially harmful not only for the mother but also for the developing fetus. Physiological changes during pregnancy result in a reduction in the serum concentrations of most AEDs, particularly in late pregnancy. Changes in protein binding lead to a greater reduction in total than free (active) drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy show interindividual variability and are not well understood for most newer AEDs. However, recent studies have shown that changes in lamotrigine clearance are particularly marked, with increases in each trimester and a significant fall in plasma concentrations, leading to consequent breakthrough seizures in some women. Concentrations may then rise precipitously after delivery, leading to symptoms of lamotrigine toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring could theoretically guide adjustment of AED dosage to achieve good seizure control while minimising fetal exposure, although there are several limitations to such monitoring. Firstly, there are wide interindividual variations in serum drug concentrations, with seizure control often correlating poorly with a given therapeutic range. Secondly, therapeutic ranges have not been well defined for newer AEDs and their measurement is often not always available. Thirdly, for highly protein-bound drugs, although measurement of free drug concentrations may more accurately reflect drug availability during pregnancy than total drug concentrations, assays for this are not always available and may be unreliable. Thus, it may be useful, prior to pregnancy, to establish the total and free drug concentrations required to achieve optimal seizure control in a given individual. Regular monitoring of AEDs has been advocated in each trimester and shortly after delivery, with adjustment of dosage to avoid seizure precipitation during pregnancy or symptoms of toxicity after birth. More frequent monitoring has been recommended for lamotrigine. However, aggressive drug monitoring of any AED has yet to be proven to be effective in improving seizure control or care. Furthermore, higher doses may be associated with a greater potential for teratogenicity and it is not yet known whether longer term adverse effects may be related to in utero exposure in the latter half of pregnancy. There is limited evidence about the relationship of maternal serum drug concentrations and teratogenicity. While there is a theoretical role for therapeutic drug monitoring in improving the risk-to-benefit ratio of AED therapy during pregnancy, there are many practical limitations. Future work is needed to clarify its role in improving seizure control during pregnancy and identifying serum drug concentrations that may be considered safe for fetal exposure.     

Review of rivastigmine and its clinical applications in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders

Rivastigmine (Exelon?, Novartis) is a novel intermediate-acting reversible and non-competitive carbamate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) that was recently introduced for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Preclinical studies have shown that rivastigmine has many similarities to other currently available cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and some important differences. The drug has been evaluated for this use in two well designed, published, adequately powered, Phase III, 26 week clinical trials that included a total of more than 1500 rivastigmine and 700 placebo recipients. Most of these patients had concomitant disorders that were being treated with numerous other drugs. These studies indicate that rivastigmine (6 - 12 mg/day) usually produces cognitive, global and functional changes that indicate significantly less deterioration than was observed with placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate AD, with higher doses producing more benefits. Rivastigmine is beneficial in all three domains (namely cognition, daily activities and behaviour) of AD. Data on long-term efficacy support continued benefits of rivastigmine beyond 6 months. Rivastigmine is generally well-tolerated with no requirement for routine electrocardiogram (ECG) or blood monitoring. Rivastigmine causes adverse events that are generally those expected from a ChEI and mainly involve gastrointestinal system. They are usually mild-to-moderate, of short duration and responsive to dosage reduction. They occur mostly during the dosage titration phase and decrease during the maintenance phase. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions are unlikely. The consistent efficacy in treating all three domains (cognition, daily functioning and behaviour) and good tolerability, particularly with slow titration, makes rivastigmine a good first-line ChEI therapy for the treatment of AD. Therapeutic dose range is 6 - 12 mg/day. Rivastigmine should be started at 1.5 mg b.i.d. with meals and increased at 2 - 4 week intervals to achieve the highest tolerated dose.