Immediate custom implant provisionalization: a prosthetic technique.

Surgical and restorative techniques that can reduce the loss of hard and soft tissues that often accompany implant placement are desirable. The use of a customized provisional restoration will provide a mechanism to assist the clinician in achieving the preservation of hard and soft tissue. This article will explore clinical scenarios in which the fabrication of an immediate, customized provisional abutment and restoration can be utilized to guide tissue healing and improve the aesthetics of implant restorations. This article will focus on the use of a provisional restoration after traditional healing.     

Immediate placement and provisionalization of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations: a retrospective study

Immediate implant placement into extraction sockets has been widely reported in the dental literature, but few studies have evaluated immediate loading of such implants. This retrospective study evaluated 206 implants placed into fresh extraction sites using a flapless technique, followed by immediate provisionalization with nonoccluding single-tooth restorations and definitive restoration within 2 weeks. Cumulative survival and success rates were 98.77% (mean follow-up, 23.1 months). Periodontitis did not influence the outcome adversely. Within the limitations of this study, immediate implant placement and restoration, followed by definitive loading within 2 weeks, achieved outcomes comparable to those historically reported for delayed implants.     

Immediate restoration of an immediate single-tooth implant

Traditional implant protocol specifies an unloaded healing period prior to restoration. Shorter healing times may be appropriate in some circumstances, and examples of early loading have been reported in the dental literature. This case report involves immediate implant placement at the time of tooth extraction, combined with construction of a restoration, inserted directly after implant surgery. The clinical procedures are described, and the specific indications which may permit this approach are presented.     

Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalization of maxillary single-tooth replacements: a prospective randomized study with BioComp implants.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of immediately loaded solid plasma sprayed (TPS) BioComp (BioComp Industries BV, Vught, The Netherlands) implants versus immediate provisionalized but non-loaded BioComp implants in the anterior and premolar region of the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (31 females and 17 males) with a mean age of 42.3+/-13.1 years (range 19 to 78 years) were included in the study. Fifty threaded TPS implants were placed and provisionalized within 24 hours after surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. In the immediate loaded (IL) group (n=24) the occlusion of the provisional was designed with normal contacts in centric relation and at lateral excursions, while in the non-immediate loaded (IP) group (n=24) the provisional restoration was adjusted to clear all occlusal contacts or contacts at lateral excursions. Patients were instructed to eat a soft diet and to avoid placing food in the area of the provisional crown during the first 6 weeks. Regular clinical and radiographic controls were performed and the survival rate and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were evaluated at delivery of the definitive restoration at 6 months. At 1 year, radiographic coronal bone defects and gingival esthetics between the 2 groups were assessed. RESULTS: Of the IL group, 2 fixtures were lost, while 3 implants were lost in the IP group. The failing implants showed increasing mobility at 2 to 3 weeks after insertion, and were removed. The remaining 45 implants were stable at every subsequent follow-up examination, and 6 months after implant placement, ISQ values were measured. The mean ISQ value in the IL group was 63.7+/-5.8 versus 63.2+/-4.3 for the IP group (P=.78). The mean mesial marginal bone loss after 12 months in the IL group was 0.27+/-0.2 mm versus 0.28+/-0.22 mm in the IP group (P=.9). The mean distal marginal bone loss after 12 months in the IL group was 0.19+/-0.15 mm versus 0.2+/-0.11 mm in the IP group (P=.87). All implants of the IL group had an ideal gingival buccal margin, versus 91% of the IP group. Full regeneration of the mesial interdental papilla was observed in 70% of the IL group versus 91% of the IP group, while full regeneration of the distal papilla was observed in 91% of both the IL and IP implants. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in ISQ mean values in radiographic bone loss and gingival esthetics were found between immediate non-loaded provisionalization and immediately loaded BioComp implants in the maxilla.     

临时种植体即刻负载在半颌即刻种植中的应用

目的：评价临时种植体即刻负载在半颌即刻种植中的应用效果。方法：20例半颌即刻种植患者行136枚即刻种植体植入,采用95枚临时种植体即刻负载恢复患者牙列。3-6月后行固定修复。结果：即刻负载临时种植体和即刻种植体成功率达100%。结论：临时种植体即刻负载半颌即刻种植是很好的临床方法。     

Immediate implant therapy in clinical practice: single-tooth replacement

Once viewed as an esoteric treatment option, implant therapy has demonstrated long-term predictability at least equal to that of more "conventional" treatment modalities. The continued evolution of implant surface technology and restorative options has made implant therapy the treatment modality of choice in many if not most, clinical situations. It is, therefore, only natural that the role of immediate implant therapy continues to expand. Proponents of immediate implant therapy advocate its use at the time of tooth removal or, in a partially or fully edentulous arch, to meet a variety of clinical challenges.     

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants

An inevitable loss of soft and hard tissue after tooth extraction often results in a compromised site for anterior implant esthetics in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization has been a viable option for replacing failing maxillary anterior teeth as it preserves the vertical existing osseous and gingival architecture. With the simultaneous addition of soft‐ and hard‐tissue grafts, the peri‐implant horizontal tissue topography can also be maintained. The esthetic success of immediate implant placement and provisionalization procedures is influenced by a number of factors that can be identified as patient‐dependent or clinician‐dependent. This article describes in detail the process of patient selection, indications, contraindications, diagnosis, treatment planning and treatment execution required to achieve functional and esthetic success with immediate implant placement and provisionalization.     

An accurate chairside technique for fabricating a temporary restoration for ITI single-tooth implant

Current implant restoration techniques depend upon a well-fitting, anatomic provisional restoration--especially at the restoration margin--to promote healthy soft tissue contours, which are necessary for successful final restorations. The ITI implant system presents a particular challenge in this regard because of the configuration of the implant head and shoulder, especially when these are placed subgingivally. A chairside method for obtaining an accurate marginal fit and customized contours in the single-tooth provisional restoration is described and illustrated.     

不翻瓣即刻牙种植临床研究

目的：介绍一种微创的即刻牙种植方法,并对其临床效果尤其是美学效果进行评价。方法：对19例颊侧上端边缘骨板完整、无明显急性根尖或牙周炎症的前牙或前磨牙进行微创拔牙术,清创拔牙窝后不翻瓣即刻植入种植体,接上适当高度和直径的愈合基台,制作塑料过度义齿固定于邻牙。3-6个月后制作永久上部结构。病例随访3-18个月,对种植体周围的软硬组织进行评价。结果：19例患者19颗种植体均获得良好骨结合,随访期内无一种植体松动脱落。种植修复成功率100%。种植体周软硬组织保存良好,种植美学效果令人满意。结论：只要选择好适应症,不翻瓣即刻种植短期可获得有保障性的临床效果,方法确实可行。     

Immediate provisionalization on a new implant design for esthetic restoration and preserving crestal bone

PURPOSE: This article describes how the concept of platform switching has been incorporated into a new implant design as a method of reducing crestal bone loss and maintaining the gingival papillae. A 6-month study of the effects of this implant on bone loss is described. MATERIALS: Ten new platform switched implants were placed into fresh anterior maxillary extraction sites in 3 men and 7 women, ranging in age between 29 and 45 years old, and immediately provisionalized. The adjoining bone height was evaluated with digital radiography on the day after implant placement, and at 15 days, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months later. RESULTS: After 6 months, the mean bone loss on the mesial of the central-incisor implants was 0.05 mm. The mean bone loss was 0.07 mm on the distal of the central incisor implants, 0.07 mm on the mesial of the lateral-incisor implants, and 0.06 mm on the distal of the lateral-incisor implants. CONCLUSIONS: An implant design that incorporates the concept of platform switching is a simple and effective way to control circumferential bone loss around dental implants, helping to ensure a predictable esthetic result.     

Evaluation of a single-tooth implant

Fifty-nine commercially pure titanium implants in 59 subjects were compared with internal control teeth for 3 years. Nineteen coated implants of identical design were placed in 17 of the subjects and compared with the titanium implants. Demographic data, microbial DNA, aspartate aminotransferase levels, Plaque Index, width of adjacent keratinized tissue, probing depths, bleeding on probing, relative attachment levels, mobility, and radiographic bone height were studied. The only statistically significant changes over time were improved plaque scores in the subjects and slight bone loss around the implants. There were no differences between the 2 types of implants. Mobility was less and probing depth and bleeding on probing were greater in the implant sites than in the control sites.     

上颌单颗前牙不翻瓣即刻种植修复的临床效果观察

目的 评价即刻种植即刻修复联合不翻瓣技术在上颌单颗前牙位点的临床应用效果,并探讨其技术要点.方法 选择上颌单颗中切牙无法保留的患者17例,采用不翻瓣技术,拔除患牙后即刻植入种植体,并即刻行种植体支持临时冠修复,术后2个月复诊调整临时冠外形,术后3个月行最终修复.最终修复后1、3、6、12、24个月复诊.最终修复即刻、1...     

Computer-guided implant placement with immediate provisionalization: a case report.

Placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone is challenging for clinicians because of patients exacting esthetic demands and preexisting anatomy. This article presents an option for highly demanding surgical cases with the use of computer-guided implant placement and immediate provisionalization. This technique optimizes implant placement and soft tissue esthetics while providing the patient with an immediate fixed restoration.     

Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Preliminary results after one year

According to the standard protocol, a load-free healing period is one of the most emphasized requirements for implant integration. Recent studies have encouraged a progressive shortening of the healing period for single-tooth implants and immediate loading has been proposed for the aesthetic zone in the maxilla. The present study evaluated clinical outcomes of immediately loaded FRIALIT-2 Synchro implants 12 months after placement in the maxillary incisal region. In the course of our investigation, nine patients have been treated following an immediate loading protocol. The stepped-screw type implants were inserted with an increasing torque up to 45 Ncm, thus measuring the primary stability of the implants. All implants were immediately restored with unsplinted acrylic resin provisional crowns and the patients provided with occlusal splints. Regular controls were performed at monthly intervals, intraoral radiographs were taken directly after implant placement, 6 and 12 months post insertion. The survival rate, clinical stability (Periotest) and radiographic coronal bone defects (CBD) were evaluated at delivery of the definitive superstructures (CBD 6) and 6 months later (CBD 12). Twelve FRIALIT-2 Synchro stepped screws of 3.8, 4.5 and 5.5 mm diameter and 13 and 15 mm length were placed in the incisal maxillary region. The median Periotest value 6 months post insertion was -2 with a minimum of -5 and a maximum of +2. The mean coronal bone level changes (CBD) at 6 and 12 months were 0.45 and 0.75 mm. No implant failed up to 12 months after insertion, resulting in a 100% survival rate. The presented results showed promising data for immediately loaded single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Periotest values were within the range published for submerged implants. The radiographic coronal bone resorption after 6 and 12 months was even less than evaluated for implants placed in a standard two-stage procedure. It is evident that successful immediate loading protocols require a careful and strict patient selection aimed at achieving the best primary stability and avoiding any excessive functional or non-functional loading. Additional research needs to be done to provide data in situations where problems of poor bone quality, multiple implants or augmentation procedures must be overcome.