WBRT for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: for whom and when?—Contemporary point of view

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) is estimated between 20% and 40% of patients with solid cancer. The most common cause of this failure is lung cancer, and in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM represent a common site of relapse in 30–55% cases. The basic criteria of therapeutic decision-making are based on the significant prognostic factors which are components of prognostic scores. The standard approach to treatment of BM from NSCLC include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) which is used as adjuvant modality after local therapy (surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) or as primary treatment and it remains the primary modality of treatment for patients with multiple metastases. WBRT is also used in combination with systemic therapy. The aim of presented review of literature is trying to answer which patients with BM from NSCLC should receive WBRT and when it could be omitted. There were presented the aspects of application of WBRT in relation to (I) choice between WBRT or the best supportive care and (II) employment of WBRT in combination with local treatment modalities [surgical resection or stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS)] and/or with systemic therapy. According to data from literature we concluded that the most important factor that needs to be considered when assessing the suitability of a patient for WBRT is the patient’s prognosis based on the Lung-molGPA score. WBRT should be applied in treatment of multiple BM from lung cancer in patients with favourable prognosis and in in patients with presence of EML4-ALK translocation before therapy with crizotinib. Whereas WBRT could be omitted in patients with poor prognosis and after primary SRS.     

Minimally invasive image-guided therapy of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with limited treatment options and poor life expectancy. The only curative option is surgical resection, but only 15%-20% of patients are resectable at presentation because more than 50% of patients has distant metastasis at diagnosis and the rest of them has locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The standard of care first line treatment for LAPC patients is chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. Recent developments in minimally invasive ablative techniques may add to the treatment armamentarium of LAPC. There are increasing number of studies evaluating these novel ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and irreversible electroporation. Most studies which included pancreatic tumor ablation, demonstrated improved overall survival in LAPC patients. However, the exact protocols are yet to set up to which stage of the treatment algorithm ablative techniques can be added and in what kind of treatment combinations. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer has dismal prognosis with 5-year survival is only 3%. The most common metastatic site is the liver as 90% of pancreatic cancer patients develop liver metastasis. Chemotherapy is the primary treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, when the tumor is not responding to chemotherapy or severe drug toxicity develops, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease progression and improve survival in selected patients. During the last decade new therapeutic options arose with the advancement of minimally invasive technologies to treat pancreatic cancer patients. These new therapies have been a topic of increasing interest due to the severe prognostic implications of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer and the low comorbid risk of these procedures. This review summarizes new ablative options for patients with LAPC and percutaneous liver-directed therapies for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease.     

Radiotherapy for brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer in distinct clinical indications and scenarios

Management of brain metastases (BM) from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is complex and not supported by a strong evidence from prospective clinical trials. Owing to the different clinical and pathological characteristics of SCLC, patients with this histology were not included in the prospective studies on the value of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and local surgical or ablative radiation treatment like stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Chemotherapy also represents a major part of the armamentarium against BM from SCLC due to the well-recognized chemoresponsiveness of this cancer and the frequent presentation of BM with extracranial progression. WBRT in combination with chemotherapy has long been a standard approach in this setting. However, data on the neurocognitive toxicity and the lack of documented impact on overall survival of WBRT in the management of BM from other solid tumors, as well as the increasing availability of the stereotactic radiotherapy technologies, has led to the increasing use of SRS with omission of WBRT also in SCLC. In the current review the use of different modalities of radiotherapy and ways of combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy for BM from SCLC will be presented for distinct clinical situations: presentation of BM synchronous with primary, metachronous presentation of BM—without previous prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) vs. after PCI, and asymptomatic BM found at the staging before PCI.     

A nomogram for predicting brain metastases of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients and estimating the efficacy of therapeutic strategies

BackgroundTo establish a nomogram for predicting the outcome of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases (BMs) and to estimate the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies.MethodsThe data of 129 cases with BM from the period between January 1st 2011 and December 31st 2014 were collected, and all of the cases were pathologically confirmed to be lung adenocarcinoma, stages I–IV and with 19 and/or 21 exon mutations of EGFR. Cox regression analysis and log-rank test were used for data analysis. The nomogram was used to establish the progression models.ResultsIn the univariate analysis, the stage, ECOG score, interval between the diagnosis of lung cancer and BM, the number of brain metastatic lesions, and the diameter of the maximal brain metastatic lesion correlated well with overall survival (OS). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the ECOG score, interval between the diagnosis of lung cancer and BM, and the number of brain metastatic lesions correlated well with the OS. Patients were divided into the poor prognostic group and the good prognostic group based on the nomogram prognostic model score. Subgroup analysis showed that in the poor prognostic group, the OS of patients who received radiotherapy was better than that of the patients who did not receive radiotherapy as the first-line treatment (30 vs. 19 months, P<0.05). The OS was 30 months in the TKI subgroup and 21 months in the no TKI subgroup, but no statistical difference was found (P>0.05). Patients in the good prognostic group who received radiotherapy had a better 3-y OS rate than the patients who received no radiotherapy as the first-line treatment (91.2% vs. 58.1%, P<0.05). The 3-y OS rate was 87.6% in the TKI subgroup and 67.8% in the no TKI group (P<0.05).ConclusionsWe established an effective nomogram model to predict the progression of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with BM and the therapeutic effect of the individual treatments. Radiotherapy was beneficial for the patients of both the poor and good prognostic groups, but TKI may be better suited for treating the patients with good prognosis.     

Management of brain metastases in elderly patients with lung cancer

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) is continuing to grow in the elderly population with lung cancer, but these patients are seriously under-represented in clinical trials. Thus, their treatment is not based on the evidence from randomized prospective studies. Age is a well recognized poor prognostic factor for survival in patients with BM from lung cancer, which is reflected in prognostic scales, but its impact on the patients'' prognosis reflected by its value in gradually updated grading indices seems to decrease. The reason for poorer outcomes in the elderly is unknown—it may result from the influence of the age per se, simplified staging work-up and suboptimal treatment in this patient subgroup or the excess toxicity of the aggressive anticancer treatment secondary to the impaired physiological regulation mechanisms and comorbidities. The main goal of treatment of BM is to ameliorate neurological symptoms and delay neurological progression, with the focus on the improvement and maintenance of the patients’ quality of life. The possible treatment options for BM from lung cancer are whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies and best supportive care. The aim of this review is to summarize the problems related to the management of BM in elderly patients with lung cancer, to analyze the value of the above mentioned treatment options, and to provide an insight into the influence of age-related clinical factors on the patients’ outcomes.     

Efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with whole-brain radiation therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundBrain metastases (BMs) develop in 20–65% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and are associated with a poor prognosis. Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively inhibits the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, is safe and significantly prolongs the survival of chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer patients. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of apatinib combined with concurrent brain radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with BMs.MethodsThis trial enrolled patients with non-recurrent BM from histologically-confirmed NSCLC without any limits regarding the BM size/quantity. Eligibility criteria were patients 18–75 years old with measurable BM from histologically-confirmed NSCLC (including both newly-diagnosed and previously treated NSCLC) and expected survival time greater than 3 months. Oral apatinib (500 or 250 mg/day) was started within 1 week prior to commencing whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB) and continued until one week after radiotherapy completion. In addition to toxicities, analyzed outcomes included intracranial overall response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), intracranial progression free survival (iPFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsFrom July 2016 to January 2020, 16 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. After 3 months of brain radiotherapy, the iORR was 75%, the iDCR was 100%, and the brain edema index (EI) was significantly reduced compared to that before brain radiation therapy (4.2 vs. 1.9; P=0.02). The median iPFS was 16.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.1–37.4 months]. The median OS was 26 months (95% CI: 17.0–54.0 months). Most of the patients tolerated apatinib well, but 7 patients had side effects, most commonly grade 1 or 2. Only 2 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events (hypertension and oral mucositis), and no grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed.ConclusionsApatinib combined with WBRT-SIB appears to be safe and effective in treating BMs in NSCLC patients.     

短程全脑放疗在非小细胞肺癌脑转移病人中的疗效观察

目的探讨非小细胞肺癌脑转移病人的全脑放疗的疗程以及影响其预后的因素。方法分析101例非小细胞肺癌脑转移全脑放疗病人，其中35例接受5天5×4GY的放疗，另外66例接受2周10×3GY或4周20×2GY的放疗，同时观察6个可能影响预后的因素：包括年龄、性别、KPS、脑转移灶数、是否有颅外转移灶、肺癌确诊到全脑放疗时间、递归分割分析级别。结果全脑放疗的疗程与生存率没有相关性，通过单变量分析：（年龄〈60岁：年龄≥60岁，P=0．020）、（KPS≥70：KPS〈70P〈0．001）、肿瘤确诊到接受全脑放疗时间（〉12月：≤12月P=0．007）、有无颅外转移（P〈0．001），提高生存率与这些因素有显著相关性。结论短程的5×4GY更容易被大部分非小细胞肺癌脑转移病人所接受，因为它与长程放疗生存率相似，短程放疗节约治疗时间、节省治疗费用。     

Clinical review: Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical update

CONTEXT: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy with incompletely understood pathogenesis and poor prognosis. Patients present with hormone excess (e.g. virilization, Cushing's syndrome) or a local mass effect (median tumor size at diagnosis > 10 cm). This paper reviews current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in ACC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Original articles and reviews were identified using a PubMed search strategy (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi) covering the time period up until November 2005. The following search terms were used in varying combinations: adrenal, adrenocortical, cancer, carcinoma, tumor, diagnosis, imaging, treatment, radiotherapy, mitotane, cytotoxic, surgery. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Tumors typically appear inhomogeneous in both computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with necroses and irregular borders and differ from benign adenomas by their low fat content. Hormonal analysis reveals evidence of steroid hormone secretion by the tumor in the majority of cases, even in seemingly hormonally inactive lesions. Histopathology is crucial for the diagnosis of malignancy and may also provide important prognostic information. In stages I-III open surgery by an expert surgeon aiming at an R0 resection is the treatment of choice. Local recurrence is frequent, particularly after violation of the tumor capsule. Surgery also plays a role in local tumor recurrence and metastatic disease. In patients not amenable to surgery, mitotane (alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs) remains the treatment of choice. Monitoring of drug levels (therapeutic range 14-20 mg/liter) is mandatory for optimum results. In advanced disease, the most promising therapeutic options (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin plus mitotane, and streptozotocin plus mitotane) are currently being compared in an international phase III trial (www.firm-act.org). Adjuvant treatment options after complete tumor removal (e.g. mitotane, radiotherapy) are urgently needed because postoperative disease-free survival at 5 yr is only around 30%, but options have still not been convincingly established. National registries, international cooperations, and trials provide important new structures for patients but also for researchers aiming at systematic and continuous progress in ACC. However, future advances in the management of ACC will mainly depend on a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis facilitating the use of modern cancer treatments (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors).     

结直肠癌肝转移立体定向消融放疗

全身治疗和转移灶局部治疗可以改善结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的生存。体部立体定向放射治疗,又称立体定向消融放疗(SABR),不仅是转移灶局部治疗的有效手段,还对全身免疫状态具有一定的影响。SABR可以直接杀伤肿瘤细胞,也通过对肿瘤细胞和非肿瘤细胞的影响改变肿瘤免疫微环境。SABR联合免疫治疗可能通过影响免疫应答的各个环节增加照射区域之外病灶远隔效应的发生率。立体定向近距离消融(SABT)是一种独立的微创治疗体系,具有疗程短、精确性高、疗效确切的特点。现就SABR和SABT在CRLM中的应用进行综述。     

Preoperative evaluation and indications for pulmonary metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an established treatment that can provide improved long-term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In the current era, where treatment options other than PM such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), immunotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy are available, thoracic surgeons should review the approach to the preoperative evaluation and the indications. Preoperative evaluation consists of history and physical examinations, physiological tests, and radiological examinations. Radiological examinations serve to identify the differential diagnosis of the pulmonary nodules, evaluate their precise number, location, and features, and search for extra thoracic metastases. The indication of PM should be considered from both physiological and oncological points of view. The general criteria for PM are as follows; (I) the patient has a good general condition, (II) the primary malignancy is controlled, (III) there is no other extrapulmonary metastases, and (IV) the pulmonary lesion(s) are thought to be completely resectable. In addition to the general eligibility criteria of PM, prognostic factors of each tumor type should be considered when deciding the indication for PM. When patients have multiple poor prognostic factors and/or a short disease-free interval (DFI), thoracic surgeons should not hesitate to observe the patient for a certain period before deciding on the indication for PM. A multidisciplinary discussion is needed in order to decide the indication for PM.     

PET-CT limitations in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: to whom more aggressive approach in radiotherapy and surgery should be directed?

This editorial comments on the study by Paravati et al., which reported on the incidence of occult regional lymph node metastases in PET-CT T1T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A central location and the size of the tumor were shown to be the strongest predictors of the risk of occult nodal disease. Authors comment that in view of limitations of modern imaging, as well as the reported negative predictive value (NPV) of invasive staging methods, the choice of therapeutic options as the extent of surgery (lobectomy or sublobar resection) or radiotherapy [stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conformal radiotherapy (RT) with some forms of elective nodal irradiation (ENI)] should consider tumor’s characteristics and not be based only on imaging and invasive staging modalities.     

PET/CT imaging of lung cancer

Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has a diagnostic and prognostic value in the initial staging, restaging, and surveillance of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When used in conjunction with conventional radiologic imaging, PET imaging has been shown to result in significant changes in clinical management of NSCLC. Specifically, baseline PET imaging can improve initial staging and guide surgical and radiotherapy planning, whereas repeat PET imaging after the initiation of chemoradiotherapy can predict tumor response and help tailor therapy. After the end of definitive treatment, PET has greater diagnostic accuracy than other imaging modalities for the detection of tumor recurrence. The recent development of fused PET/CT imaging has improved the radiologic evaluation of NSCLC patients by combining metabolic and anatomic imaging; however, this has resulted in more complexity in the image interpretation. It is important for the interpreting physician to understand the role PET/CT plays in the staging, assessment of treatment, and follow-up after therapy in the multidisciplinary management of patients with NSCLC.     

非小细胞肺癌脑转移预后影响因素

目的探讨非小细胞肺癌脑转移的生存情况及预后影响因素。方法选取我院2014年6月至2018年12月确诊139例非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者,收集临床资料并随访生存时间。运用Kaplan-Meier法对每个临床因素的不同水平进行生存分析,Log-rank法进行生存曲线的比较。采用单因素、多因素分析方法来筛选非小细胞肺癌脑转移的预后影响因素。结果本研究139例患者中位生存时间为11.2个月,对症支持组、全脑放疗组、靶向治疗组、全脑放疗+靶向治疗组、全脑放疗+化疗+靶向治疗组分别为8.1个月、10.1个月、14.6个月、16.7个月、23.4个月。单因素分析显示病理类型、发生脑转移的时间、EGFR突变的状态、RPA分级以及治疗方式对非小细胞肺癌脑转移的发生有显著影响作用。多因素分析表明KPS评分、RPA分级、治疗方法、发生脑转移的时间及EGFR突变状态是影响生存期的独立预后因素。结论经积极治疗(化疗+全脑放疗+靶向治疗)脑转移瘤患者可以获得更长生存期,高KPS评分、RPA I级、异时性脑转移及EGFR敏感突变型是非小细胞肺癌脑转移的预后良好因素。     

Bronchoscopic treatments for early‐stage peripheral lung cancer: Are we ready for prime time?

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer‐related death worldwide and surgical lobectomy remains the preferred therapy for patients with early‐stage NSCLC. Medical comorbidities and advanced age preclude resection in many patients and minimally invasive ablative therapies are needed for treatment. Stereotactic ablative radiation is established as an effective modality in this patient group, although may be contraindicated in some patients with prior radiation exposure, comorbidities or centrally positioned tumours. Percutaneous ablative methods are available, although are frequently associated with significant complications. Numerous endoscopic ablative techniques are under evaluation. With a more favourable safety profile and the ability to provide diagnosis and staging information potentially within a single procedure, there is a strong rationale for development of bronchoscopic ablative modalities. In the following article, the authors aim to explore the role bronchoscopic ablation may play in treatment of peripheral lung tumours, and to describe a pathway to establishing these modalities as part of routine care. The current status of several bronchoscopic ablative options is discussed in detail.     

Combined modality treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Among all nonmetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the best survival rates are observed in patients who undergo surgery. Nevertheless, 5-year survival rates vary between 20% and 60% depending on the stage of the disease. Several combined modality treatments have been investigated to improve outcome in localized NSCLC. These include local treatment, systemic before local treatment, concomitant systemic and local treatments, and systemic after local treatment. Preoperative irradiation was shown to be of no benefit on local recurrence rates or overall survival. Even doses of radiation >/=40 grays (Gy) were associated with lower survival rates. Postoperative irradiation did not influence survival in stage III disease and seemed to be deleterious in stages I and II disease. Modern radiotherapy techniques might be of interest in this setting but have been insufficiently tested. The early phase III studies of preoperative chemotherapy versus primary surgery in stage III NSCLC showed a tremendous difference in favor of chemotherapy. A larger study did not confirm these results but suggested that preoperative chemotherapy might have a greater effect in stages I and II of the disease. In locally advanced disease, chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy was shown to increase survival when compared with radiotherapy alone. Studies comparing concurrent chemoradiation with radiotherapy only were in favor of the concomitant schedule, which improved local control. Promising results have been reported with chemoradiation followed by surgery in stage IIIa and even stage IIIb disease. Randomized studies of postoperative chemotherapy demonstrated a 5% improvement in 5-year survival over adjuvant-free treatment. Postoperative chemoradiation showed no advantage over postoperative radiotherapy. Several trials that are ongoing or whose accrual was recently completed should further define the role of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC and of trimodality treatments in advanced disease. Targeted agents are being developed in the postoperative setting. New schedules of chemoradiation with higher therapeutic indexes are also being investigated in nonresectable stage III NSCLC.     

重视肝癌的立体定向放射消融治疗

肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤,手术切除及肝移植被认为是目前HCC可能的治愈方法,但仅30%～40%的患者能够受益。体部立体定向放射消融治疗(SABR)是近几年应用于体部恶性肿瘤治疗的一种新的精确放疗技术,以"少分次、大剂量"改变了传统的剂量分割模式,因其提高了体部恶性肿瘤的局部控制率、延长了总生存时间而受到重视。射波刀(CK)完成的SABR放疗技术具有高精度、无创伤的优点,可完成实时追踪照射(很好地解决了肿瘤的呼吸移动对治疗的影响),获得了理想的治疗有效率和局部无进展生存率、总生存率,同时3级以上放疗毒性反应发生率很低,是一种理想的治疗技术,为进一步提高HCC的临床疗效带来了新的希望。     

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: role of tumor markers and liver biopsy

Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a significant impact on survival by implementation of effective treatment strategies, including hepatic resection, locoregional ablative therapy, and liver transplantation. The use of serum tumor markers and biopsy are particularly important for diagnosis of small hepatic lesions with atypical features on imaging studies. α-Fetoprotein remains the most frequently used tumor marker for the diagnosis of HCC. The development of novel serum biomarkers for HCC, identification of molecular markers for tissue immunohistochemistry, and emergence of new diagnostic techniques such as proteomic profiling may improve the early detection rate of HCC in the future.     

Technical advances in external radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Radiotherapy techniques have substantially improved in the last two decades. After the introduction of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, radiotherapy has been increasingly used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Currently, more advanced techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy(SABR), and charged particle therapy, are used for the treatment of HCC. IMRT can escalate the tumor dose while sparing the normal tissue even though the tumor is large or located near critical organs. SABR can deliver a very high radiation dose to small HCCs in a few fractions, leading to high local control rates of 84%-100%. Various advanced imaging modalities are used for radiotherapy planning and delivery to improve the precision of radiotherapy. These advanced techniques enable the delivery of high dose radiotherapy for early to advanced HCCs without increasing the radiation-induced toxicities. However, as there have been no effective tools for the prediction of the response to radiotherapy or recurrences within or outside the radiation field, future studies should focus on selecting the patients who will benefit from radiotherapy.     

SBRT治疗Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的最新研究进展

体部立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)又称为立体消融放射疗法,如今已经成为治疗Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),尤其是不能手术患者的标准方法之一.过去的10年中,大量回顾性研究和临床试验的结果显示,SBRT在治疗Ⅰ期NSCLC中充分发挥了灵活、安全及高效的特点.近年来,随着Ⅱ期临床试验的进展,大家对SBRT的放射生物学特点、临...     

Current role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as an invaluable tool for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). EUS is currently the most sensitive imaging tool for the detection of solid pancreatic tumors. Conventional EUS has evolved, and new imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced harmonics and elastography, have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy during the evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. More recently, evaluation with artificial intelligence has shown promising results to overcome operator-related flaws during EUS imaging evaluation. Currently, an appropriate diagnosis is based on a proper histological assessment, and EUS-guided tissue acquisition is the standard procedure for pancreatic sampling. Newly developed cutting needles with core tissue procurement provide the possibility of molecular evaluation for personalized oncological treatment. Interventional EUS has modified the therapeutic approach, primarily for advanced pancreatic cancer. EUS-guided fiducial placement for local targeted radiotherapy treatment or EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation has been developed for local treatment, especially for patients with pancreatic cancer not suitable for surgical resection. Additionally, EUS-guided therapeutic procedures, such as celiac plexus neurolysis for pain control and EUS-guided biliary drainage for biliary obstruction, have dramatically improved in recent years toward a more effective and less invasive procedure to palliate complications related to PDAC. All the current benefits of EUS in the diagnosis and management of PDAC will be thoroughly discussed.