Influence of weight reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Increased body weight is a strong risk factor for hypertension. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to estimate the effect of weight reduction on blood pressure overall and in population subgroups. Twenty-five randomized, controlled trials (comprising 34 strata) published between 1966 and 2002 with a total of 4874 participants were included. A random-effects model was used to account for heterogeneity among trials. A net weight reduction of -5.1 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.03 to -4.25) by means of energy restriction, increased physical activity, or both reduced systolic blood pressure by -4.44 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.93 to -2.95) and diastolic blood pressure by -3.57 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.88 to -2.25). Blood pressure reductions were -1.05 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.43 to -0.66) systolic and -0.92 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.28 to -0.55) diastolic when expressed per kilogram of weight loss. As expected, significantly larger blood pressure reductions were observed in populations with an average weight loss >5 kg than in populations with less weight loss, both for systolic (-6.63 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.43 to -4.82] vs -2.70 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.59 to -0.81]) and diastolic (-5.12 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.48 to -3.75] vs -2.01 mm Hg [95% CI, -3.47 to -0.54]) blood pressure. The effect on diastolic blood pressure was significantly larger in populations taking antihypertensive drugs than in untreated populations (-5.31 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.64 to -3.99] vs -2.91 mm Hg [95% CI, -3.66 to -2.16]). This meta-analysis clearly shows that weight loss is important for the prevention and treatment of hypertension.     

Long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure on BP in patients with hypertension and sleep apnea

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on ambulatory BP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension, and to identify subgroups of patients for whom CPAP could be more effective. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, long-term follow-up trial (24 months) in 55 patients with OSA and hypertension (mean CPAP use, 5.3 +/- 1.9 h/d [+/- SD]). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was measured at baseline and after intervention with CPAP on an intention-to-treat basis. In addition, the correlation between the changes in 24-h mean arterial pressure (24hMAP) and CPAP compliance, OSA severity, and baseline ABPM was assessed. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, a significant decrease was shown only in diastolic BP (- 2.2 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 4.2 to - 0.1; p = 0.03) but not in 24hMAP or other ABPM parameters. However, a correlation between changes in 24hMAP and baseline systolic BP (r = - 0.43, p = 0.001), diastolic BP (r = - 0.38, p = 0.004), and hours of use of CPAP (r = - 0.30, p = 0.02) was observed. A significant decrease in the 24hMAP was achieved in a subgroup of patients with incompletely controlled hypertension at entry (- 4.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, - 7.9 to - 0.9 mm Hg; p = 0.01), as well as in those with CPAP compliance > 5.3 h/d (- 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, - 9.5 to - 1.2 mm Hg; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed that baseline systolic BP and hours of CPAP were independent predictors of reductions in BP with CPAP. CONCLUSION: Long-term CPAP reduced BP modestly in the whole sample. However, patients with higher BP at entry and good CPAP compliance achieved significant reductions in BP.     

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Resistant Hypertension: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aimed to analyze the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and resistant hypertension. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of CPAP on BP in patients with OSA and resistant hypertension, indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until March 20, 2015, were included in the meta‐analysis. A total of five RCTs were identified to meet the inclusion criteria. The pooled changes after CPAP treatment for 24‐hour ambulatory systolic BP and diastolic BP (DBP) were −4.78 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], −7.95 to −1.61) and −2.95 mm Hg (95% CI, −5.37 to −0.53) in favor of the CPAP group. CPAP was also associated with reduction in nocturnal DBP (mean difference, −1.53 mm Hg, 95% CI, −3.07 to 0). The results indicated a favorable reduction in BP with CPAP treatment in patients with OSA and resistant hypertension.     

The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) might lower blood pressure, but evidence from clinical studies is inconsistent, perhaps as a result of small sample size or heterogeneity in study design. This study aimed to assess whether CPAP reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with OSAS, to quantify the effect size with precision, and to identify trial characteristics associated with the greatest blood pressure reductions. METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials of CPAP vs placebo in patients with OSAS specifically reporting 24-hour ambulatory mean blood pressure (MBP). RESULTS: We included a total of 572 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials. According to a random-effects model, the pooled estimate of the effect of the CPAP intervention was a net decrease of 1.69 mm Hg in 24-hour MBP (95% confidence interval, -2.69 to -0.69). Statistical heterogeneity was moderate (I(2) = 41%). Predefined metaregression analyses estimated that 24-hour MBP would decrease by 0.89 mm Hg per 10-point increase in apnea-hypopnea index at entry (P = .006), by 0.74 mm Hg for each increase of 10 arousal events per hour slept (P = .008), and by 1.39 mm Hg for each 1-hour increase in effective nightly use of the CPAP device (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with OSAS, CPAP reduces 24-hour ambulatory MBP, with greater treatment-related reductions in ambulatory MBP among patients with a more severe degree of OSAS and a better effective nightly use of the CPAP device. These reductions in blood pressure are likely to contribute to a better prognosis in terms of adverse cardiovascular events.     

Continuous positive airway pressure does not reduce blood pressure in nonsleepy hypertensive OSA patients.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Several randomised controlled trials have shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment of OSA reduces blood pressure (BP). This randomised, sham-placebo controlled crossover trial assesses whether CPAP produces a similar clinically significant fall in BP in hypertensive OSA patients, but without hypersomnolence. Thirty-five, nonsleepy, hypertensive patients with OSA were treated with CPAP for 1 month, randomised first to either therapeutic or sham-placebo (subtherapeutic CPAP, about 1 cmH(2)O pressure). The second months' alternative treatment followed a 2-week washout period. BP was measured over 24 h, before and at the end of the two treatment periods: mean 24-h BP was the primary outcome variable. There was no overall significant difference in mean 24-h BP: the change in mean 24-h BP on therapeutic CPAP was -2.1 mmHg (sd 8.1), and -1.1 mmHg (sd 8.1) on subtherapeutic CPAP, with a difference of 0.7 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI) +2.9- -4.4). There was a small significant fall in Epworth Sleepiness Score, therapeutic (-1.4) versus sham (-0.3), and difference -1.2 (95% CI -2.0- -0.4), but no change in objective sleepiness. In nonhypersomnolent hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, there is no significant fall in mean 24-h blood pressure with continuous positive airway pressure, in contrast to the fall seen in hypersomnolent patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.     

Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults: a Cochrane review

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation to lower high blood pressure. We searched electronic bibliographic databases and grey literature to identify randomized controlled trials comparing relaxation therapies with no active treatment or sham therapy, enrolling adult participants with raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 85 mm Hg and follow-up > or = 8 weeks. Twenty-five trials with up to 5 years follow-up, assessing 1198 participants, met our inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. Overall, relaxation resulted in small, statistically significant reductions in SBP (mean difference: -5.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.2 to -2.8) and DBP (mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.3 to -1.6) compared to the control. Substantial heterogeneity between trials (I2 > 70%) was not explained by duration of follow-up, type of control, type of relaxation therapy or baseline blood pressure. The 9 trials that reported blinding of outcome assessors found a non-significant net reduction in blood pressure (SBP mean difference: -3.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.7 to 1.4) associated with relaxation, as did the 15 trials comparing relaxation with sham therapy (SBP mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.1 to 0.2). Adequate randomization was confirmed in only seven trials and concealment of allocation in only one. In view of the poor quality of the included trials and unexplained variation between trials, the evidence in favour of a causal association between relaxation and blood pressure reduction is weak. Some of the apparent benefit of relaxation was probably due to aspects of treatment unrelated to relaxation.     

Meta‐analysis of changes in the levels of catecholamines and blood pressure with continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea

Stress from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) stimulates catecholamine release consequently exacerbating hypertension. However, different studies have shown a conflicting impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with OSA on catecholamine levels and blood pressure. We aimed to examine changes to catecholamine levels and blood pressure in response to CPAP treatment. We conducted a meta‐analysis of data published up to May 2020. The quality of the studies was evaluated using standard tools for assessing the risk of bias. Meta‐analysis was conducted using RevMan (v5.3) and expressed in standardized mean difference (SMD) for catecholamines and mean difference (MD) for systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). A total of 38 studies met our search criteria; they consisted of 14 randomized control trials (RCT) totaling 576 participants and 24 prospective cohort studies (PCS) of 547 participants. Mean age ranged between 41 and 62 year and body mass index between 27.2 and 35.1 kg/m². CPAP treatment reduced 24‐hour urinary noradrenaline levels both in RCT (SMD = −1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.63 to − 0.56) and in PCS (SMD = 0.38 (CI: 0.24 to 0.53). SBP was also reduced by CPAP treatment in RCT (4.8 mmHg; CI: 2.0‐7.7) and in PCS (7.5 mmHg; CI: 3.3‐11.7). DBP was similarly reduced (3.0 mmHg; CI: 1.4‐4.6) and in PCS (5.1 mmHg; CI: 2.3‐8.0). In conclusion, CPAP treatment in patients with OSA reduces catecholamine levels and blood pressure. This suggests that sympathetic activity plays an intermediary role in hypertension associated with OSA‐related stress.     

The acute effect of phenylpropanolamine and brompheniramine on blood pressure in controlled hypertension

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute effect of phenylpropanolamine, 75 mg, and brompheniramine, 12 mg, in combination (PPA/B) on blood pressure in patients with controlled hypertension, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). DESIGN: Randomized double-blind crossover trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at one medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 13 healthy volunteers aged 36 to 64 years, receiving medication for hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: Following 24-hour baseline ABPM, participants were randomized to receive either placebo or PPA/B every 12 hours for three doses, while ABPM continued. After a 24-hour washout period, all participants received the crossover regimen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No clinically important or statistically significant difference was noted for mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures during the baseline (125/75), PPA/B (127/72), and placebo (126/73) phases of the study. Within the first four hours of treatment, the mean change in systolic blood pressure from baseline between PPA/B and placebo phases was 1.7 mm Hg (95% CI -5.3 to 8.7), and mean change in diastolic blood pressure was 0.9 mm Hg (95% CI -1.6 to 3.5), excluding a first-dose pressor effect. CONCLUSION: When used as recommended, PPA/B, a commonly used over-the-counter cold medication, has no significant acute effect on blood pressure in patients with controlled hypertension.     

Daytime pulmonary hypertension in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists regarding the development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the absence of lung and heart comorbidity. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether OSA patients without any other cardiac or lung disease develop pulmonary hypertension, and to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on pulmonary artery pressure (P(PA)). METHODS: Twenty-nine patients aged 51 +/- 10 years with OSA and 12 control subjects were studied with pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography for estimation of P(PA) before and after 6-month effective treatment with CPAP. RESULTS: A significantly higher mean P(PA) was found in OSA patients as compared to control subjects (17.2 +/- 5.2 vs. 12.1 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Six out of the 29 OSA patients had mild pulmonary hypertension (P(PA) > or = 20 mm Hg). Significant differences were observed between pulmonary hypertensive and normotensive OSA patients with respect to age (62 +/- 4 vs. 48 +/- 15 years, respectively, p < 0.05), body mass index (41 +/- 7 vs. 32 +/- 4 kg/m(2), p < 0.02) and daytime P(a)O(2) (81 +/- 9 vs. 92 +/- 9 mm Hg, p < 0.05). CPAP treatment was effective in reducing mean P(PA) in both groups of pulmonary hypertensive and normotensive OSA patients (decreases in P(PA) from 25.6 +/- 4.0 to 19.5 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, p < 0.001; from 14.9 +/- 2.2 to 11.5 +/- 2.0 mm Hg, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion (20.7%) of OSA patients without any other lung or heart disease and characterized by older age, greater obesity and lower daytime oxygenation develop mild pulmonary hypertension which has been partially or completely reversed after 6-month CPAP treatment. In conclusion, OSA alone constitutes an independent risk factor for the development of pulmonary hypertension.     

Continuous positive airway pressure treatment improves pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Daytime pulmonary hypertension (PH) is relatively common in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and is thought to be associated with pulmonary vascular remodeling (PRm). The extent to which PH is reversible with treatment is uncertain. To study this, we measured pulmonary hemodynamics (Doppler echocardiography) in 20 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 48.6 +/- 5.2/h, mean +/- SEM) before and after 1 and 4 mo of CPAP treatment (compliance 4.7 +/- 0.5 h/night). Patients had normal lung function, and no cardiac disease or systemic hypertension. Doppler studies were performed at three levels of inspired oxygen concentration (11%, 21%, and 50%) and during incremental increases in pulmonary blood flow (10, 20, and 30 microg/kg/min dobutamine infusions). Treatment resulted in a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa, 16.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg before CPAP versus 13.9 +/- 0.6 mm Hg after 4 mo CPAP, p < 0.05) and total pulmonary vascular resistance (231.1 +/- 19.6 versus 186.4 +/- 12.3 dyn. s. cm(-)(5), p < 0.05). The greatest treatment effects occurred in the five patients who were pulmonary hypertensive at baseline. The pulmonary vascular response to hypoxia decreased after CPAP (DeltaPpa/DeltaSa(O(2)) 10.0 +/- 1.6 mm Hg before versus 6.3 +/- 0.8 mm Hg after 4 mo CPAP, p < 0.05). The curve of Ppa versus cardiac output (Q), derived from the incremental dobutamine infusion, shifted downward in a parallel fashion during treatment. Systemic diastolic blood pressure also fell significantly. Improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics were not attributable to changes in left ventricular diastolic function or Pa (O(2)). We conclude that CPAP treatment reduces Ppa and hypoxic pulmonary vascular reactivity in OSA and speculate that this may be due to improved pulmonary endothelial function.     

Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial

Experimental and epidemiological studies suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplements may lower blood pressure. We examined the effect of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure and the incidence of hypertension in postmenopausal women. The Women's Health Initiative Calcium/Vitamin D Trial randomly assigned 36 282 postmenopausal women to receive 1000 mg of elemental calcium plus 400 IU of vitamin D3 daily or placebo in a double-blind fashion. Change in blood pressure and the incidence of hypertension were ascertained. Over a median follow-up time of 7 years, there was no significant difference in the mean change over time in systolic blood pressure (0.22 mm Hg; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.49 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (0.11 mm Hg; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.27 mm Hg) between the active and placebo treatment groups. This null result was robust in analyses accounting for nonadherence to study pills and in baseline subgroups of interest, including black subjects and women with hypertension or high levels of blood pressure, with low intakes of calcium and vitamin D or low serum levels of vitamin D. In 17 122 nonhypertensive participants at baseline, the hazard ratio for incident hypertension associated with calcium/vitamin D treatment was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.06.) In postmenopausal women, calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation did not reduce either blood pressure or the risk of developing hypertension over 7 years of follow-up.     

Effect of cocoa and tea intake on blood pressure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence suggests blood pressure-lowering effects of cocoa and tea. We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure due to the intake of cocoa products or black and green tea. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched from 1966 until October 2006 for studies in parallel group or crossover design involving 10 or more adults in whom blood pressure was assessed before and after receiving cocoa products or black or green tea for at least 7 days. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled studies of cocoa administration involving a total of 173 subjects with a median duration of 2 weeks were included. After the cocoa diets, the pooled mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were -4.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.6 to -1.8 mm Hg; P = .002) and -2.8 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.8 to -0.8 mm Hg; P = .006) lower, respectively, compared with the cocoa-free controls. Five studies of tea consumption involving a total of 343 subjects with a median duration of 4 weeks were selected. The tea intake had no significant effects on blood pressure. The estimated pooled changes were 0.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.3 to 2.2 mm Hg; P = .63) in systolic and -0.6 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.5 to 0.4 mm Hg; P = .38) in diastolic blood pressure compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Current randomized dietary studies indicate that consumption of foods rich in cocoa may reduce blood pressure, while tea intake appears to have no effect.     

The effects of continuous positive airway pressure therapy withdrawal on cardiac repolarization: data from a randomized controlled trial

Aims The preliminary evidence supports an association between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), disturbed cardiac repolarization, and consequent cardiac dysrhythmias. The aim of the current trial was to assess the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy withdrawal on the measures of cardiac repolarization in patients with OSA. Methods and results Forty-one OSA patients established on CPAP treatment were randomized to either CPAP withdrawal (subtherapeutic CPAP) or continue therapeutic CPAP for 2 weeks. Polysomnography was performed, and indices of cardiac repolarization (QT(c), TpTe(c) intervals) and dispersion of repolarization (TpTe/QT ratio) were derived from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) at baseline and 2 weeks. Continuous positive airway pressure withdrawal led to a recurrence of OSA. Compared with therapeutic CPAP, subtherapeutic CPAP for 2 weeks was associated with a significant increase in the length of the QT(c) and TpTe(c) intervals (mean difference between groups 21.4 ms, 95% CI 11.3-1.6 ms, P < 0.001 and 14.4 ms, 95% CI 7.2-21.5 ms, P < 0.001, respectively) and in the TpTe/QT ratio (mean difference between groups 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.03, P = 0.020). There was a statistically significant correlation between the change in apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) from baseline, and both the change in the QT(c) interval and the TpTe(c) interval (r = 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.77, P < 0.001 and r = 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-0.67, P = 0.003, n = 41, respectively). Conclusion Continuous positive airway pressure withdrawal is associated with the prolongation of the QT(c) and TpTe(c) intervals and TpTe/QT ratio, which may provide a possible mechanistic link between OSA, cardiac dysrhythmias, and thus sudden cardiac death.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm birth and later systolic blood pressure

Lower birth weight because of fetal growth restriction is associated with higher blood pressure later in life, but the extent to which preterm birth (<37 completed weeks' gestation) or very low birth weight (<1500 g) predicts higher blood pressure is less clear. We performed a systematic review of 27 observational studies that compared the resting or ambulatory systolic blood pressure or diagnosis of hypertension among children, adolescents, and adults born preterm or very low birth weight with those born at term. We performed a meta-analysis with the subset of 10 studies that reported the resting systolic blood pressure difference in millimeters of mercury with 95% CIs or SEs. We assessed methodologic quality with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The 10 studies were composed of 1342 preterm or very low birth weight and 1738 term participants from 8 countries. The mean gestational age at birth of the preterm participants was 30.2 weeks (range: 28.8-34.1 weeks), birth weight was 1280 g (range: 1098-1958 g), and age at systolic blood pressure measurement was 17.8 years (range: 6.3-22.4 years). Former preterm or very low birth weight infants had higher systolic blood pressure than term infants (pooled estimate: 2.5 mm Hg [95% CI: 1.7-3.3 mm Hg]). For the 5 highest quality studies, the systolic blood pressure difference was slightly greater, at 3.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.6-5.0 mm Hg). We conclude that infants who are born preterm or very low birth weight have modestly higher systolic blood pressure later in life and may be at increased risk for developing hypertension and its sequelae.     

The effect of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: An increased intake of magnesium might lower blood pressure (BP), yet evidence from clinical trials is inconsistent, perhaps as a result of small sample size or heterogeneity in study design. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that tested the effects of magnesium supplementation on BP. Twenty trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Random effects models and meta-regression methods were used to pool study results and to determine the dose-response relationship of magnesium to BP. RESULTS: The 20 studies included 14 of hypertensive and 6 of normotensive persons totaling 1220 participants. The doses of magnesium ranged from 10 to 40 mmol/day (median, 15.4 mmol/day). Magnesium supplementation resulted in only a small overall reduction in BP. The pooled net estimates of BP change (95% confidence interval [CI]) were -0.6 (-2.2 to 1.0) mm Hg for systolic BP and -0.8 (-1.9 to 0.4) mm Hg for diastolic BP. However, there was an apparent dose-dependent effect of magnesium, with reductions of 4.3 mm Hg systolic BP (95% CI 6.3 to 2.2; P < .001) and of 2.3 mm Hg diastolic BP (95% CI 4.9 to 0.0; P = .09) for each 10 mmol/day increase in magnesium dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis detected dose-dependent BP reductions from magnesium supplementation. However, adequately powered trials with sufficiently high doses of magnesium supplements need to be performed to confirm this relationship.     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on pulmonary artery pressure in patients with isolated obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) can occur in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the absence of cardiac or lung disease. Data on the development and severity of PH, and the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on pulmonary artery (PA) pressures in these patients have been inconsistent in the literature. We sought to determine whether CPAP therapy affects PA pressures in patients with isolated OSA in this meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and other databases from January 1980 to August 2015. Studies of patients with OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index >10 events/h, and PH, defined as PA pressure >25 mmHg were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A total of 222 patients from seven studies (341.53 person-years) had reported PA pressures before and after treatment with CPAP therapy. 77 % of participants were men, with a mean age of 52.5 years, a mean apnea–hypopnea index of 58 events/h, and mean PA pressure of 39.3 ± 6.3 mmHg. CPAP treatment duration ranged from 3 to 70 months. Using fixed effects meta-analysis, CPAP therapy was associated with a decrease in PA pressure of 13.3 mmHg (95 % CI 12.7–14.0) in our study population. This meta-analysis found that CPAP therapy is associated with a significantly lower PA pressure in patients with isolated OSA and PH.     

Association between blood pressure and serum thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration within the reference range: a population-based study

CONTEXT: The association between thyroid function and blood pressure is insufficiently studied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the investigation was to study the association between TSH within the reference range and blood pressure. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cross-sectional, population-based study. SUBJECTS: A total of 30,728 individuals without previously known thyroid disease were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure and odds ratio for hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg or current or previous use of antihypertensive medication), according to categories of TSH. RESULTS: Within the reference range of TSH (0.50-3.5 mU/liter), there was a linear increase in blood pressure with increasing TSH. The average increase in systolic blood pressure was 2.0 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.6 mm Hg] per milliunit per liter increase in TSH among men, and 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI 1.4-2.3 mm Hg) in women. The corresponding increase in diastolic blood pressure was 1.6 mm Hg (95% CI 1.2-2.0 mm Hg) in men and 1.1 mm Hg (95% CI 0.8-1.3 mm Hg) in women. Comparing TSH of 3.0-3.5 mU/liter (upper part of the reference) with TSH of 0.50-0.99 mU/liter (lower part of the reference), the odds ratio for hypertension was 1.98 (95% CI 1.56-2.53) in men and 1.23 (95% CI 1.04-1.46) in women. CONCLUSION: Within the reference range of TSH, we found a linear positive association between TSH and systolic and diastolic blood pressure that may have long-term implications for cardiovascular health.     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVES: Previous reports on the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on blood pressure has shown contradictory results. Accordingly, we have investigated the effects of CPAP on blood pressure and on the potential reversal of the diagnosis of hypertension in patients with OSA evaluated repeatedly by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: We studied 122 patients (104 men and 18 women), 55.1+/-10.5 years of age, with diagnosis of OSA corroborated by overnight polysomnography at the clinic. Among those patients, 83 were treated with CPAP after their first evaluation, while 39 remained without CPAP for the duration of the trial. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours, at baseline and after 2 and 4 months of intervention. RESULTS: There was a small, but not statistically significant, reduction in ambulatory blood pressure in patients treated with CPAP (0.7 and 1.5 mmHg in 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 2 months of therapy; 2.0 and 2.3 mmHg after 4 months; P>0.239). The blood pressure reduction was very similar in patients with OSA followed for 4 months without CPAP (1.9 and 2.2 mmHg in 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; P=0.543). We found a high (77%) prevalence of hypertension among the patients participating in this study, although only 37% were receiving antihypertensive medication at the time of recruitment. The prevalence of hypertension was slightly but not significantly reduced to just 74% after 4 months of treatment with CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: The small reduction in blood pressure for consecutive profiles of ambulatory monitoring can probably be explained by the documented 'ABPM pressor effect' on patients using the ambulatory device for the first time. The high prevalence of hypertension among patients with OSA is not significantly reduced by treatment with CPAP. These results suggest that patients with OSA should always be properly evaluated for diagnosis of hypertension, and provided, if needed, with antihypertensive treatment apart from the recommended CPAP.     

Meta-analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and their effects on blood pressure

BACKGROUND: Nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed and are associated with blood pressure (BP) elevation. The development of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) raises the issue of the magnitude of BP response compared with nonselective NSAIDs. We therefore performed a meta-analysis comparing the effects of coxibs with placebo, nonselective NSAIDs, and each other on BP elevation and hypertension. METHODS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving coxibs were published before May 2004, with a total of 45 451 participants in which BP data were available. The Cohen method statistically combined weighted mean difference (WMD). The Der Simonian and Laird method pooled results concerning the relative risk (RR) of developing hypertension and the RR of clinically important BP elevations. RESULTS: Among the trials analyzed, coxibs caused a WMD point estimate increase in systolic and diastolic BP compared with placebo (3.85/1.06 mm Hg) and nonselective NSAIDs (2.83/1.34 mm Hg). Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were associated with a nonsignificantly higher RR of causing hypertension compared with placebo (RR, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.84; P = .10) and nonselective NSAIDs (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.87-1.78; P = .23). Rofecoxib induced a WMD point estimate increase in systolic BP (2.83 mm Hg) and a nonsignificantly higher risk of developing clinically important systolic BP elevation (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.00-2.26; P = .05) compared with celecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were associated with a point-estimate BP elevation compared with placebo and nonselective NSAIDs. There was a nonsignificantly higher incidence of developing hypertension compared with nonselective NSAIDs, as was observed with rofecoxib compared with celecoxib. These BP elevations may be clinically significant in relation to increased cardiovascular risk.     

Coenzyme Q10 in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of the clinical trials

Our objective was to review all published trials of coenzyme Q10 for hypertension, assess overall efficacy and consistency of therapeutic action and side effect incidence. Meta-analysis was performed in 12 clinical trials (362 patients) comprising three randomized controlled trials, one crossover study and eight open label studies. In the randomized controlled trials (n=120), systolic blood pressure in the treatment group was 167.7 (95% confidence interval, CI: 163.7-171.1) mm Hg before, and 151.1 (147.1-155.1) mm Hg after treatment, a decrease of 16.6 (12.6-20.6, P<0.001) mm Hg, with no significant change in the placebo group. Diastolic blood pressure in the treatment group was 103 (101-105) mm Hg before, and 94.8 (92.8-96.8) mm Hg after treatment, a decrease of 8.2 (6.2-10.2, P<0.001) mm Hg, with no significant change in the placebo group. In the crossover study (n=18), systolic blood pressure decreased by 11 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 8 mm Hg (P<0.001) with no significant change with placebo. In the open label studies (n=214), mean systolic blood pressure was 162 (158.4-165.7) mm Hg before, and 148.6 (145-152.2) mm Hg after treatment, a decrease of 13.5 (9.8-17.1, P<0.001) mm Hg. Mean diastolic blood pressure was 97.1 (95.2-99.1) mm Hg before, and 86.8 (84.9-88.8) mm Hg after treatment, a decrease of 10.3 (8.4-12.3, P<0.001) mm Hg. We conclude that coenzyme Q10 has the potential in hypertensive patients to lower systolic blood pressure by up to 17 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by up to 10 mm Hg without significant side effects.