Nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND The relation between medications that release nitric oxide, such as nitroglycerin and other nitrovasodilators, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding is uncertain. In animals, these medications reduce the gastric damage induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Nitric oxide, however, inhibits platelet aggregation and may contribute to bleeding from an ulcer. METHODS: We performed a case-control study to determine the risk of bleeding in patients taking nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The case group was made up of 1122 consecutive patients admitted to one of four hospitals with bleeding from a peptic lesion. The 2231 control subjects were 1109 patients hospitalized for other reasons and 1122 outpatients from the same geographic area. RESULTS: In the week before admission, 520 (46.3 percent) of the patients with bleeding had taken a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug other than low-dose aspirin, 120 (10.7 percent) had taken low-dose aspirin (< or = 300 mg per day), 60 (5.3 percent) a nitrovasodilator, and 135 (12.0 percent) an antisecretory agent such as a histamine H2-receptor antagonist or a proton-pump inhibitor. In multivariate models that adjusted for age, sex, and clinical risk factors, the use of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug other than low-dose aspirin was independently associated with an increased risk of bleeding from a peptic ulcer (odds ratio, 7.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.5 to 12.0), as was the use of low-dose aspirin alone (odds ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 3.3). The use of a nitrovasodilator was associated with a decreased risk of bleeding (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.9), as was antisecretory therapy (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.8). In patients taking any type of nonsteroidai antiinflammatory drug, the use of a nitrovasodilator or antisecretory therapy was independently associated with a decreased risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nitrovasodilator drugs is independently associated with a decreased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.     

Incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a major adverse event of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and co-administration of proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists has been established as a means of preventing such an effect. However, the incidence of bleeding associated with NSAID-induced ulcers under conditions where such strong anti-acid agents are used for prevention has yet to be clarified. We aimed to determine the annual incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding among Japanese patients in whom NSAIDs were used in our hospital. Before commencing the study, we recommended to all the physicians in our hospital the best method for caring for NSAID users, focusing on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors or H2 receptor antagonists. We conducted a cohort study involving 17,270 patients for whom NSAIDs had been newly prescribed. Bleeding from gastric ulcers was observed in 8 of the 17,270 patients using NSAIDs (0.05%). The pooled incidence rate for bleeding was calculated as 2.65 (95% confidence interval, 2.56-2.74) and 1.29 (1.27-1.31) per 1,000 patient years for low-dose aspirin and non-aspirin NSAID users, respectively. None of the bleeding ulcer patients required blood transfusion or were in serious condition. In conclusion, gastric ulcer bleeding occurred in low-dose aspirin or non-aspirin NSAID users, but its incidence was low and outcomes were not serious when adequate preventive measures were taken.     

The role of screening for Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulceration in the primary health care setting.

BACKGROUND: It is known that at least 90% of duodenal ulcers are caused by infection with the bacterium Helicobacter pylori. Eradicating this organism usually results in complete resolution of the disease. Testing for H pylori was introduced relatively recently, and thus, many patients known to have uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease who continue to need long-term treatment with ulcer-healing drugs have never been tested for the infection or offered eradication therapy. In modern computerized practices, this subgroup of patients can readily be identified by reference to morbidity and repeat prescribing data. Eradication of H pylori infection in this group of patients has great potential benefit for the individuals concerned as well as cost-saving benefit for the National Health Service. AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether it is worthwhile screening for and treating H pylori infection in patients in a general practice population with previously diagnosed duodenal ulcer disease taking ulcer-healing drugs long term. METHOD: In 1994, in a practice of 7100 patients, morbidity and repeat prescribing data were used to identify 40 patients (0.6%) with proven duodenal ulcer disease taking ulcer-healing medication long term and with uncertain H pylori status. Twenty-nine of the 40 subjects agreed to undergo serology testing for H pylori antibodies. Of 20 (69%) who were positive, 18 (eight women, median age 63.8 years) were given eradication therapy. Seventeen patients received omeprazole 40 mg once daily and amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily for 14 days with metronidazole 400 mg three times daily for the first 7 days; for the remaining patient metronidazole was inadvertently omitted. [13C]Urea breath testing was carried out at the local hospital at least one month after therapy to determine whether eradication treatment had been successful. Subjects were also personally followed up by telephone after 1 and 4 months to assess the success of treatment subjectively. RESULTS: [13C]Urea breath testing showed that H pylori eradication was successful in all 17 patients (100%) who received the intended eradication regimen. Helicobacter pylori was not eradicated in the patient who received only omeprazole and amoxycillin. Four months after successful H pylori eradication, 13 of the 17 (76%) patients remained completely asymptomatic. Two of the four patients who had some recurrent dyspepsia had known gastro-oesophageal reflux and their ongoing symptoms after eradication therapy seemed, on close questioning, to be more attributable to this than to duodenal ulcer disease. CONCLUSION: Testing for and eradication of H pylori is worthwhile in general practice in those patients with previous proven duodenal ulceration who need long-term ulcer-healing medication. The high rate of eradication of H pylori achieved with the regimen used in this study compares very favourably with that of other treatment regimens. However, in patients with duodenal ulcers there may be coexisting pathology, and H pylori eradication does not necessarily result in complete disappearance of dyspeptic symptoms. Thus, when monitoring the outcome of treatment it is important to assess improvement of symptoms as well as objective evidence of eradication.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in clinical situations

Helicobacter pylori is prevalent worldwide, especially in developing countries, and is associated with several upper gastrointestinal diseases. Since it is present in over 90% of duodenal ulcer patients, empirical eradication in these patients is often recommended. In gastric ulcer patients, eradication is indicated only after the infection is confirmed. Testing for H. pylori infection should be carried out in patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage, because eradication has been shown to reduce recurrent bleeding. Both H. pylori and NSAIDs are risk factors for peptic ulceration, and it is reasonable to screen for and eradicate H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer patients taking NSAIDs. H. pylori is a group I carcinogen for gastric adenocarcinoma, and should be eradicated for the primary prevention of this cancer. Eradication of this organism has been reported to result in regression of early low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. The role of H. pylori infection in the causation of gastroesophageal reflux and non-ulcer dyspepsia is not clearly established. Several tests are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. These include invasive tests, such as histology, culture and urease test, and non-invasive tests, such as serology, urea breath test and stool antigen test. The choice of test is determined by clinical indication, pretest probability of infection, as well as the availability, cost, sensitivity and specificity of the test. H. pylori eradication therapy using proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin and amoxycillin for 7 days has a success rate of 85-90%. Improved living standard and sanitation are vital in the control of H. pylori transmission and infection. Future development may include the use of vaccines against H. pylori, and therapies specifically targeting cagA strains of the bacteria.     

Open access gastroscopy findings are unrelated to the use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

This study aims to determine whether priority should be given to patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin when selecting which dyspeptic patients to refer for open access gastroscopy. A total of 8156 patients underwent gastroscopy, all of whom had upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients taking NSAIDs or aspirin showed no significant differences in the frequency of ulcer disease when age-matched groups were compared. Although NSAIDs and aspirin are frequently implicated in gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly, patients referred for investigation of dyspepsia show no increase in major endoscopic pathology.     

The histopathology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastroduodenal damage: correlation with Helicobacter pylori, ulcers, and haemorrhagic events

AIMS: The spectrum of microscopic lesions resulting from the chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), known as chemical gastritis, remains unclear, and the variable prevalence reported in different studies makes this issue a matter of lively debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and importance of chemical gastritis in patients regularly taking NSAIDs. Owing to the high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, particularly in subjects over 60 years of age, and in view of a possible association with damage, the presence of H pylori infection in the same tissue sample was also determined in all patients. METHODS: One hundred and ninety seven subjects were enrolled, 118 of whom were receiving chronic treatment with NSAIDs and 79 of whom were controls, pair matched for age, sex, and clinical symptoms (ulcer-like dyspepsia or upper digestive tract haemorrhage). Antral biopsies taken during upper gastroduodenal endoscopy were assessed for chemical gastritis according to a modified version of Dixon's score, and for Helicobacter correlated chronic active gastritis, according to the updated Sydney system. RESULTS: Chemical gastritis was identified in 11 patients taking NSAIDs (9%) and in four controls (5%) (p < 0.05). Helicobacter pylori was detected in 53 patients taking NSAIDs (45%) and in 34 controls (43%). Patients taking NSAIDs had a significantly higher number of erosions and ulcers and worse endoscores than controls. The presence of H pylori did not appear to increase histological damage, ulcer prevalence, or haemorrhagic events. CONCLUSIONS: Chemical gastritis is present in a limited number of patients regularly taking NSAIDs, and is not strongly correlated with NSAID induced damage. In many cases of peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking NSAIDs, the presence of chemical gastritis or H pylori infection cannot solely account for the development of mucosal damage.     

Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group

BACKGROUND: Each year, clinical upper gastrointestinal events occur in 2 to 4 percent of patients who are taking nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We assessed whether rofecoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, would be associated with a lower incidence of clinically important upper gastrointestinal events than is the nonselective NSAID naproxen among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 8076 patients who were at least 50 years of age (or at least 40 years of age and receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy) and who had rheumatoid arthritis to receive either 50 mg of rofecoxib daily or 500 mg of naproxen twice daily. The primary end point was confirmed clinical upper gastrointestinal events (gastroduodenal perforation or obstruction, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers). RESULTS: Rofecoxib and naproxen had similar efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis. During a median follow-up of 9.0 months, 2.1 confirmed gastrointestinal events per 100 patient-years occurred with rofecoxib, as compared with 4.5 per 100 patient-years with naproxen (relative risk, 0.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.6; P<0.001). The respective rates of complicated confirmed events (perforation, obstruction, and severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding) were 0.6 per 100 patient-years and 1.4 per 100 patient-years (relative risk, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.8; P=0.005). The incidence of myocardial infarction was lower among patients in the naproxen group than among those in the rofecoxib group (0.1 percent vs. 0.4 percent; relative risk, 0.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.7); the overall mortality rate and the rate of death from cardiovascular causes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, treatment with rofecoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, is associated with significantly fewer clinically important upper gastrointestinal events than treatment with naproxen, a nonselective inhibitor.     

Absence of benefit of eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia is uncertain. We tested the hypothesis that curing the infection will relieve symptoms of dyspepsia. METHODS: We randomly assigned 170 H. pylori-infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia to receive twice-daily treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole, 1000 mg of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin for 14 days and 167 such patients to receive identical-appearing placebos; all patients were then followed through regular visits for 12 months. Symptoms were scored on diary cards for seven days before each visit. A carbon-13 urea breath test was performed at base line and repeated at 1 and 12 months, and endoscopic biopsy was performed at 12 months to determine H. pylori status. Treatment was considered successful if the patient had only mild pain or discomfort or none at all. RESULTS: The rate of eradication of H. pylori infection was 90 percent in the active-treatment group and 2 percent in the placebo group at four to six weeks (P<0.001). At 12 months, there was no significant difference between groups in the rate of successful treatment (46 percent in the active-treatment group and 50 percent in the placebo group; relative likelihood of success with active treatment, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.56). There was also no significant difference in the rate of successful treatment at 12 months between patients who were H. pylori-negative and those who were H. pylori-positive (48 percent vs. 49 percent). The rates of successful treatment were also similar when patients were analyzed according to the type of dyspepsia (ulcer-like, reflux-like, or dysmotility-like) and changes in the quality of life. There was no significant association between treatment success and histologic improvement in chronic gastritis at 12 months (P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that curing H. pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia leads to relief of symptoms.     

儿童上消化道出血与幽门螺杆菌感染的关系

目的研究儿童上消化道出血与幽门螺杆菌（Helicobacter pylori,Hp）感染之间的关系。方法对98例上消化道出血患儿组和65例非上消化道出血患儿组同时用13C-尿素呼气试验（13C-UBT）和采用ELISA法测定血清Hp抗体来判断Hp感染情况,所有患儿均行电子胃镜检查。结果上消化道出血患儿组和非上消化道出血患儿组的Hp阳性率分别为59.18%、18.46%,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.001）。结论儿童上消化道出血与幽门螺杆菌感染有密切关系。     

埃索美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡150例疗效观察

目的：观察埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Helicobacter Pylori，简称HP）阳性消化性溃疡的效果。方法：将确诊为HP阳性消化性溃疡150例患者随机分为埃索美拉唑组和奥美拉唑组，每组75例。两组分别给予阿莫西林1g，1日2次，克拉霉素0．5g，1日2次，埃索美拉唑组加用埃索美拉唑20mg，1日2次，奥美拉唑组加用奥美拉唑20mg，1日2次。1周后两组分别单用埃索美拉唑20mg，1日1次，奥美拉唑20mg，1日1次，维持治疗3周。两组患者治疗前和治疗后检测HP状况。结果：埃索美拉唑组溃疡愈合率为93．4％，奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率为90．7％；埃索美拉唑组HP根除率为93．3％，奥美拉唑组HP根除率为90．6％。两组比较溃疡愈合率及HP根除率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；第1天和第2天腹痛缓解率埃索美拉唑组为34．7％和60．0％，奥美扭唑组为16．0％和36．0％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：埃索美拉胜、阿英西林、克拉霉素三联疗法治疗HP感染消化性溃疡优于奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素三联疗法，腹痛缓解较快。     

Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND: After endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers, bleeding recurs in 15 to 20 percent of patients. METHODS: We assessed whether the use of a high dose of a proton-pump inhibitor would reduce the frequency of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. Patients with actively bleeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels were treated with an epinephrine injection followed by thermocoagulation. After hemostasis had been achieved, they were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive omeprazole (given as a bolus intravenous injection of 80 mg followed by an infusion of 8 mg per hour for 72 hours) or placebo. After the infusion, all patients were given 20 mg of omeprazole orally per day for eight weeks. The primary end point was recurrent bleeding within 30 days after endoscopy. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 patients, 120 in each group. Bleeding recurred within 30 days in 8 patients (6.7 percent) in the omeprazole group, as compared with 27 (22.5 percent) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 3.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 9.0). Most episodes of recurrent bleeding occurred during the first three days, which made up the infusion period (5 in the omeprazole group and 24 in the placebo group, P<0.001). Three patients in the omeprazole group and nine in the placebo group underwent surgery (P=0.14). Five patients (4.2 percent) in the omeprazole group and 12 (10 percent) in the placebo group died within 30 days after endoscopy (P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: After endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers, a high-dose infusion of omeprazole substantially reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding.     

Parietal cell protrusions and fundic gland cysts during omeprazole maintenance treatment

Parietal cell protrusion (PCP), swelling and bulging of parietal cells, has been observed in the oxyntic mucosa of patients receiving omeprazole. The frequency of this event and the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified. As such, it is unknown whether there is a relation with either serum gastrin or Helicobacter pylori infection, and whether PCP predisposes to the development of fundic gland cysts (FGC). We therefore investigated the development of PCP and FGC in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients treated with omeprazole and correlated findings to duration of therapy, gastrin, and H pylori infection. In a randomized, double-blinded study, GERD patients were evaluated by endoscopy with biopsy sampling for histology and culture at baseline, and after 3 and 12 months' therapy with omeprazole 40 mg daily. H pylori-positive patients were randomized to additional eradication therapy or placebo antibiotics at baseline. All histological slides were scored blinded for time and outcome of culture for the presence of PCP and FGC. Fasting serum samples from all visits were used for gastrin measurements. The prevalence of PCP increased during omeprazole therapy from 18% at baseline to 79% and 86% at 3 and 12 months (P < .001, baseline v both 3 and 12 months). The prevalence of FGC increased from 8% to 17% and 35% (P < .05, baseline v 12 months). The prevalence of PCP and FGC did not differ among the H pylori-positive and H pylori-negative patients at baseline (PCP 16% v 20% and FGC 7% v 8%, respectively). Whereas H pylori eradication did not significantly affect development of PCP (P = .7), FGC developed significantly more often in the H pylori-eradicated patients when compared with persistent H pylori-positive patients (P < .05). PCP development was related to serum gastrin rise during therapy. In conclusion, PCP occurs in most patients within the first months of omeprazole treatment and is related to increased gastrin levels. FGC develops more gradually and is enhanced by H pylori eradication.     

Dietary nitrate and reductive polyphenols may potentiate the vascular benefit and alleviate the ulcerative risk of low-dose aspirin

The recent revelation that daily low-dose aspirin not only lowers risk for vascular events, but also can notably decrease risk for a range of adenocarcinomas, decreasing total cancer mortality by about 20%, makes it highly desirable to implement this protective strategy on a population-wide basis. Nonetheless, the fact that low-dose aspirin approximately doubles risk for serious gastrointestinal bleeding may impede health authorities from recommending its use by people judged to be at low cardiovascular risk. Nitric oxide (NO) exerts gastroprotective effects by boosting blood flow and mucus production in the gastric mucosa – effects which demonstrably oppose the pro-ulcerative impact of aspirin and other NSAIDs. A nitrate-rich diet, as well as ingestion of reductive catechol-bearing polyphenols, can collaborate in promoting NO generation in gastric juice, and they are protective in rodent models of gastric ulceration. Moreover, a high-nitrate diet, as well as certain reductive polyphenols such as epicatechin and quercetin, can exert platelet-stabilizing effects complementary to those of aspirin, and act in other ways to preserve vascular health. Hence, diets rich in nitrate and reductive polyphenols have the potential to amplify the vascular-protective benefits of low-dose aspirin, while diminishing its pro-ulcerative risk. Low-dose aspirin may be more unequivocally recommendable within the context of such a dietary strategy.     

Safe pharmacologic treatment strategies for osteoarthritis pain in African Americans with hypertension, and renal and cardiac disease

Arthritis is the leading cause of disability in the United States. Osteoarthritis, the most common form of arthritis, is a degenerative joint disease affecting both whites and African Americans similarly. African Americans have a high incidence rate of comorbidities, including hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and diabetes. Treatment of osteoarthritic pain in patients with comorbidities is often complicated by potential safety concerns. Traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) specific NSAIDs have been shown to increase blood pressure in hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive medications. Patients with CVD risk factors taking low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention may be at increased risk for gastrointestinal bleeding with NSAIDs. Diabetics face an increased risk of renal complications. Because NSAIDs are associated with adverse renal effects, they should be used cautiously in patients with advanced renal disease. Acetaminophen is the most appropriate initial analgesic for African Americans with chronic osteoarthritic pain and concurrent hypertension, CVD risk factors or diabetes, and is recommended by the American College of Rheumatology as first-line treatment. Many of the adverse effects commonly associated with NSAIDs are not associated with acetaminophen. Safety concerns surrounding pharmacologic treatment of osteoarthritis in African Americans are reviewed.     

A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group

We report the results of the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study, a blinded trial at 56 North American centers that compared the effects of ticlopidine hydrochloride (500 mg daily) with those of aspirin (1300 mg daily) on the risk of stroke or death. The medications were randomly assigned to 3069 patients with recent transient or mild persistent focal cerebral or retinal ischemia. Follow-up lasted for two to six years. The three-year event rate for nonfatal stroke or death from any cause was 17 percent for ticlopidine and 19 percent for aspirin--a 12 percent risk reduction (95 percent confidence interval, -2 to 26 percent) with ticlopidine (P = 0.048 for cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimates). The rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke at three years were 10 percent for ticlopidine and 13 percent for aspirin--a 21 percent risk reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 38 percent) with ticlopidine (P = 0.024 for cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimates). Ticlopidine was more effective than aspirin in both sexes. The adverse effects of aspirin included diarrhea (10 percent), rash (5.5 percent), peptic ulceration (3 percent), gastritis (2 percent), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1 percent). With ticlopidine, diarrhea (20 percent), skin rash (14 percent), and severe but reversible neutropenia (less than 1 percent) were noted. The mean increase in total cholesterol level was 9 percent with ticlopidine and 2 percent with aspirin (P less than 0.01). The ratios of high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol were similar in both treatment groups. We conclude that ticlopidine was somewhat more effective than aspirin in preventing strokes in this population, although the risks of side effects were greater.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pyloriin clinical situations

Abstract. Helicobacter pylori is prevalent worldwide, especially in developing countries, and is associated with several upper gastrointestinal diseases. Since it is present in over 90% of duodenal ulcer patients, empirical eradication in these patients is often recommended. In gastric ulcer patients, eradication is indicated only after the infection is confirmed. Testing for H. pylori infection should be carried out in patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage, because eradication has been shown to reduce recurrent bleeding. Both H. pylori and NSAIDs are risk factors for peptic ulceration, and it is reasonable to screen for and eradicate H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer patients taking NSAIDs. H. pylori is a group I carcinogen for gastric adenocarcinoma, and should be eradicated for the primary prevention of this cancer. Eradication of this organism has been reported to result in regression of early low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. The role of H. pylori infection in the causation of gastroesophageal reflux and non-ulcer dyspepsia is not clearly established. Several tests are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. These include invasive tests, such as histology, culture and urease test, and non-invasive tests, such as serology, urea breath test and stool antigen test. The choice of test is determined by clinical indication, pretest probability of infection, as well as the availability, cost, sensitivity and specificity of the test. H. pylori eradication therapy using proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin and amoxycillin for 7 days has a success rate of 85–90%. Improved living standard and sanitation are vital in the control of H. pylori transmission and infection. Future development may include the use of vaccines against H. pylori, and therapies specifically targeting cagA strains of the bacteria.     

Helicobacter pylori infection and erosive gastritis

One hundred and eleven patients were included in the study. Thirty seven had erosive gastritis, thirty four chronic gastritis and forty were controls without any gastrointestinal diseases confirmed by symptoms and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients with erosive gastritis were divided into non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users and non-users. H pylori status was determined by urease test, serology and/or histology. The prevalence of H pylori was compared between the various groups. The prevalence of H pylori infection in erosive gastritis, chronic gastritis and controls was 68%, 76% and 65%, respectively, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05), 8 out of 11 patients with erosive gastritis and NSAID use (73%) were positive for H pylori. Likewise 17/26 patients with erosive gastritis without NSAID use (65%) were positive for H pylori (P > 0.05). Body of the stomach (65%) was the commonest site for erosions compared to antrum (43%) or fundus (27%) (P < 0.02). H pylori infection does not predispose to erosive gastritis. NSAID use does not affect H pylori prevalence. Routine H pylori eradication is, therefore, not indicated in patients with erosive gastritis infection. Body of the stomach is the most predominant site for erosions.     

Chemical gastritis and Helicobacter pylori related gastritis in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: comparison and correlation with peptic ulceration.

AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence and significance of chemical gastritis, in comparison with gastritis related to Helicobacter pylori in patients receiving non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen patients were studied, 174 of whom were taking NSAIDs. Chemical gastritis was defined as the presence of foveolar hyperplasia, muscle fibres in the lamina propria, oedema and vasodilation, in the absence of a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate. RESULTS: Chemical gastritis was found in 46 (26%) patients taking NSAIDs, and three (7%) in subjects not taking these drugs (p less than 0.01). H pylori was detected in 56 (32%) subjects taking NSAIDs compared with 22 (50%) not taking these agents (p less than 0.02). Ulcers were found in 16 out of 72 patients (22%) taking NSAIDs and without H pylori infection or chemical gastritis compared with 27 out of 56 (48%) with H pylori related gastritis (p less than 0.01), and 25 out of 46 (54%) with chemical gastritis (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Peptic ulcers associated with the use of NSAIDs seem to occur more commonly in patients with chemical gastritis or H pylori infection. Patients taking NSAIDs also seem to have a greater prevalence of chemical gastritis but a lower prevalence of H pylori than those not taking these drugs.     

Efficacy of two triple eradication regimens in children with Helicobacter pylori infection

Triple therapy with bismuth subsalicylate, amoxicillin, metronidazole (BAM) or with omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin (OAC) has been commonly used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. We compared the efficacy of these triple therapies in children with H. pylori infection. We retrospectively analyzed results in 233 children with H. pylori infection and treated with OAC (n=141) or BAM (n=92). Overall eradication rates of triple therapy with OAC and BAM were 74% and 85%, respectively, which showed no statistical difference. Our study showed that the triple therapy with BAM was more effective for the first-line eradication of H. pylori infection in Korean children, but has no statistical difference with OAC regimen.     

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin.

BACKGROUND: Patients with arthritis and vascular disease may receive both low-dose aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. We therefore investigated potential interactions between aspirin and commonly prescribed arthritis therapies METHODS: We administered the following combinations of drugs for six days: aspirin (81 mg every morning) two hours before ibuprofen (400 mg every morning) and the same medications in the reverse order; aspirin two hours before acetaminophen (1000 mg every morning) and the same medications in the reverse order; aspirin two hours before the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (25 mg every morning) and the same medications in the reverse order; enteric-coated aspirin two hours before ibuprofen (400 mg three times a day); and enteric-coated aspirin two hours before delayed-release diclofenac (75 mg twice daily) RESULTS: Serum thromboxane B(2) levels (an index of cyclooxygenase-1 activity in platelets) and platelet aggregation were maximally inhibited 24 hours after the administration of aspirin on day 6 in the subjects who took aspirin before a single daily dose of any other drug, as well as in those who took rofecoxib or acetaminophen before taking aspirin. In contrast, inhibition of serum thromboxane B(2) formation and platelet aggregation by aspirin was blocked when a single daily dose of ibuprofen was given before aspirin, as well as when multiple daily doses of ibuprofen were given. The concomitant administration of rofecoxib, acetaminophen, or diclofenac did not affect the pharmacodynamics of aspirin CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant administration of ibuprofen but not rofecoxib, acetaminophen, or diclofenac antagonizes the irreversible platelet inhibition induced by aspirin. Treatment with ibuprofen in patients with increased cardiovascular risk may limit the cardioprotective effects of aspirin.