Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses. I. Technic and results

88 intraabdominal abscesses in 77 patients were treated by percutaneous drainage. Patients were cured in 63 percent. Complications were observed in 11 percent followed by surgery in two instances. Ten out of 75 patients (13 percent) died in the postprocedural course from multiple organ failure or postoperative complications. A fatal outcome, however, was never attributable to the percutaneous procedure. Technical considerations of percutaneous abscess drainage are described in detail. Its similarities with open drainage and advantages over septic surgery are discussed.     

Medical education in China: Historical background,present status,and further development

Sixty-five abscesses, including 6 infected biliary systems and 15 sterile fluid collections, were treated by percutaneous catheter drainage in 77 febrile patients who were evaluated by computerized tomograhy or ultrasonography for intraabdominal infection. Percutaneous catheter drainage and systemic antibiotic administration without surgery provided satisfactory control of infection in 52 of 65 abscesses (80 percent). Catheter drainage followed by surgical exploration for abscess control was performed in an additional 5 of the 65 abscesses (7 percent). Nine deaths (14 percent) occurred in the abscess group of 64 patients. In 15 patients, aspirations, Gram stain, and culture of the abnormal fluid collection revealed sterile fluid. Drainage with a single catheter allowed complete resolution in 14 of 15 sterile collections. Surgery was performed electively in one patient with a fistula from a pancreatic pseudocyst in the small bowel. No deaths occurred in the noninfected group of 15 patients, 2 of whom underwent drainage of coexisting abscesses.     

Let's reclassify pancreatitis

Twenty patients with pancreatic abscesses were studied to determine if recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances have improved the outlook for those with the disease. An abscess developed as a complication of alcoholic pancreatitis in 10 patients and was due to previous surgery in 9. Ultrasonography and computerized tomographic scanning of the abdomen were helpful in the diagnosis and localization of the abscesses. All 20 patients were treated surgically. Operative mortality was 30 percent and was due to multiple system failure from continuing sepsis. Only 2 of 15 patients who had sump drainage died compared with 3 of 4 patients who were drained with Penrose drains alone. There were two deaths among 10 patients who received nutritional support and four deaths in 10 patients who did not receive hyperalimentation. Pancreatic abscess remains a lifethreatening condition. Ultrasonography and computerized tomographic scanning have helped in diagnoses and localization. The addition of sump drainage has reduced the mortality rate from 75 to 13 percent. Nutritional support also appears to be helpful in reducing mortality.     

Improved treatment of intra-abdominal abscess. A result of improved localization, drainage, and patient care, not technique

Outcome in patients with abdominal abscesses treated at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, between 1973 and 1978 (group 1) was compared with that in patients treated between 1981 and 1986 (group 2). Mortality was less in group 2 patients (21% vs 39% in group 1). The decrease in mortality in group 2 was accompanied by a greater percentage of successful predrainage localization (74% vs 55% in group 1), successful initial drainage (76% vs 55% in group 1), and decreased predrainage organ failure (23% vs 52% in group 1). Because failure of initial drainage and predrainage organ failure were associated with increased mortality, improvement in both of these criteria contributed substantially to the lower mortality in group 2 patients. There were no differences in mortality, in initial success in drainage, or in length of hospital stay when 29 group 2 patients who underwent percutaneous drainage were compared with 37 patients who underwent surgical drainage. Mortality (22% vs 21%) and initial success (78% vs 72%) were similar for patients who underwent surgical and percutaneous drainage, respectively. We conclude that initial success in localization and drainage of the abscess is more important than whether drainage is surgical or percutaneous.     

Percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage: Portland area experience

After reviewing 21 patients who have had percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage, we believe that the procedure should be considered for those abscesses that are unilocular without septations, with safe access being a key variable dictating the use of percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage rather than surgery. A computerized tomographic scan of the abdomen should be employed at some stage of the percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage procedure to facilitate safe access to the abscess and to distinguish a synchronous abscess where present. In addition, we believe that percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage should be considered for postsurgical abscesses only and not those that are spontaneous in nature or where the original abnormality cannot be accurately surmised. With regard to catheter management, frequent irrigation of the catheter must be carried out at least every 4 to 6 hours, with high levels of antibiotics present in the blood before irrigation. This must be done to obviate the most frequent and potentially lethal complication of the procedure, namely sepsis. Percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage, although safe for the most part, is capable of inducing considerable morbidity. Our data suggest that percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage is not as efficacious as previous reports have suggested. Traditional surgical drainage techniques are best utilized for those abscesses that are multiple, highly viscous, inaccessible, spontaneous, or unresponsive to percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage.     

Interventional and surgical treatment of pancreatic abscess

Pancreatic abscess is one of the infectious complications of acute pancreatitis. It is a collection principally containing pus, but it may also contain variable amounts of semisolid necrotic debris. Most of these abscesses evolve from the progressive liquefaction of necrotic pancreatic and peripancreatic tissues, but some arise from infection of peripancreatic fluid or collections elsewhere in the peritoneal cavity. Included also are abscesses found after surgical débridement and drainage of pancreatic necrosis. Although open surgical treatment of infected necrosis is the established treatment of choice, percutaneous drainage of abscesses is successful in some circumstances. We used percutaneous catheter drainage in 39 patients during 1987–1995. Only 9 of 29 (31%) attempts at primary therapy were successful; 2 patients died, and 18 required subsequent surgical drainage. On the other hand, 14 of 14 patients with recurrent or residual abscesses after surgical drainage were successfully drained percutaneously. Percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic abscesses may be useful for initial stabilization of septic patients, drainage of further abscesses after surgical intervention (especially when access for reoperation will be difficult), associated abscesses remote from the pancreas, and selected unilocular collections at a sufficient interval after necrotizing pancreatitis to have allowed essentially complete liquefaction.     

Pyogenic liver abscess. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

A retrospective review of 26 adult patients admitted to University of California, Davis, Medical Center (UCDMC) with pyogenic liver abscess (1980-1986) was performed to ascertain the impact of rapid diagnosis and percutaneous drainage. Ultrasonographic examinations and computed tomography (CT) scans were highly sensitive and noninvasive imaging modalities. Sixteen patients had solitary abscesses and seven had multiple microscopic abscesses. The median time interval from admission to diagnosis and therapy was 2 and 3 days, respectively. Origin of the abscess was determined in 22 patients, the biliary tree being the most common source. Medical therapy was successful in three patients with microabscesses but failed in two. Nine patients had percutaneous drainage; two required repetitive percutaneous catheter placement, and two proceeded to surgical drainage. Twelve patients had surgical drainage; one required repetitive surgical drainage. Postdrainage complications were minimal in all groups. Overall mortality role was 11.5% (two patients). Deaths were related to delay in diagnosis, gram-negative sepsis at presentation, and biliary origin of the abscess.     

Strategies in the management of pyogenic psoas abscesses.

The presentation and management of eight patients with pyogenic psoas abscesses treated at the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, between January 1986 and July 1989 are presented. The psoas abscesses were secondary to underlying gastrointestinal disease in six patients and sacral osteomyelitis in one patient. In one patient, the etiology of the abscess could not be determined. The average duration of symptoms in these patients was 16 days. Computed tomography was useful in identifying the abscess, defining its complexity, and planning therapy in all eight patients. Seven patients had complex, multiloculated abscesses, and one patient had a simple abscess. Extraperitoneal drainage was used in all patients. The patients with multiloculated abscesses had open surgical drainage, while the patient with the simple abscess had percutaneous catheter drainage. Most patients with a gastrointestinal etiology for their abscess underwent staged resection 3 to 6 weeks after the drainage procedure. There were no deaths, recurrent abscesses, or fistulae in these patients. Two patients developed thromboembolic complications postoperatively. Extraperitoneal drainage with staged resection of underlying gastrointestinal pathology is a safe and effective way of treating patients with psoas abscesses.     

经腹腔穿刺器置双套管引流治疗腹腔脓肿

目的 探讨经腹腔穿刺器(Trocar)置双套管引流在腹腔脓肿治疗中的应用.方法 回顾性分析2010年6-12月间在南京军区南京总医院接受经腹腔穿刺器置双套管引流的32例腹腔脓肿患者的临床资料.操作方法:超声与CT明确脓肿部位及大小后,在CT或超声下定位并明确穿刺深度,经腹腔穿刺器穿刺置双套管引流.结果 32例患者均成功穿刺,1例因胰腺癌术后出现肝转移合并多脏器功能衰竭死亡,1例因多发小肠瘘感染灶未局限需开腹手术引流;其余30例患者引流后感染症状逐渐缓解,并最终治愈,平均愈合时间为(7±3)d.2例合并穿刺处皮下出血,经局部压迫止血,出血停止.结论 经Trocar穿刺置入双套管引流治疗腹腔脓肿疗效满意,尤其适用于脓液黏稠或存在蜂窝织炎及坏死组织、脓肿呈多囊性且脓腔较大者.

Abstract：

Objective To study the effects of placement of double cannula using trocar puncture for intra-abdominal abscess drainage. Methods A retrospective study was performed to investigate the clinical data of 32 patients undergoing intra-abdominal abscess drainage with double cannula placed using trocar puncture between June 2010 and December 2010. Techniques: the location and size of the abscess was evaluated by ultrasound and CT. Placement of double cannula using trocar puncture was performed under CT or ultrasound guidance. Results Trocar puncture was successful in all the patients . One patient died of liver metastasis and multiple organ failure after surgery for pancreatic cancer. One patient required laparotomy and drainage because non-localization of sepsis from intestinal fistula. The remaining 30 patients experienced alleviation of septic symptoms after drainage and eventually cured. The mean healing time was (7±3) days. Two patients developed subcutaneous bleeding and were management by local compression. Conclusions Placement of double cannula using trocar puncture for intra-abdominal abscess drainage results in satisfactory outcomes. This technique is especially suitable for abscesses with viscous drainage, those with the presence of phlegmon or necrotic debris, and those with multiple large cavities.     

The surgical management of pancreatic abscess.

In the past 6 years we have operated on 13 patients with pancreatic abscess. Sepsis recurred in all 12 in whom the primary procedure was closed drainage. Following further surgical debridement of these recurrent abscesses 2 patients had further closed drainage and in 10 the cavities were packed open to heal by granulation. One patient underwent primary open packing which eliminated the pancreatic abscess but the patient subsequently died. Six patients (46%) died: one of lung abscesses after recovering completely from secondary open packing, one of an unsuspected carcinoma of the pancreas after secondary closed drainage and 4 of multiple organ failure after secondary open packing. There were no residual intraabdominal abscesses in any of these at autopsy. Four of those who died had initially presented with catastrophic pancreatitis according to Ranson's criteria and all 3 patients with initial sepsis scores of greater than or equal to 15 died. Open packing, whilst appearing to provide better drainage of pancreatic abscesses than closed drainage does not have a dramatic influence on mortality. Future reports of the results of open and closed methods of treating pancreatic abscesses should take account of both the severity of pancreatitis and of sepsis.     

CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses

The effective treatment of intracranial abscess remains controversial. Progress in technology, linked with the development of neuronavigational systems, has made stereotactic aspiration and drainage of intracerebral abscesses effective and valid alternatives to traditional methods, namely, conservative medical treatment or open surgical excision. Between 1995 and 2002, 12 patients at our hospital underwent drainage of intracerebral abscesses under stereotactic guidance. Ten patients had solitary lesions and two had multiple abscesses. The appropriate antibiotic schemes were administered following culture of the aspirated material. The size of the abscess, the mass effect, and response to antibiotic treatment were followed up by repeated CT scans. All patients showed improvement and, at the end of treatment, returned to their previous activities. There were neither deaths nor any postoperative complication. A second aspiration was required in one patient due to recurrence of the abscess. The CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses helps achieve all treatment goals. It drains the contents of the abscess, reduces mass effect, and confirms diagnosis. It is minimally invasive, carries minimal morbidity and mortality, and can be performed on compromised patients under local anesthesia.     

CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses

The effective treatment of intracranial abscess remains controversial. Progress in technology, linked with the development of neuronavigational systems, has made stereotactic aspiration and drainage of intracerebral abscesses effective and valid alternatives to traditional methods, namely, conservative medical treatment or open surgical excision. Between 1995 and 2002, 12 patients at our hospital underwent drainage of intracerebral abscesses under stereotactic guidance. Ten patients had solitary lesions and two had multiple abscesses. The appropriate antibiotic schemes were administered following culture of the aspirated material. The size of the abscess, the mass effect, and response to antibiotic treatment were followed up by repeated CT scans. All patients showed improvement and, at the end of treatment, returned to their previous activities. There were neither deaths nor any postoperative complication. A second aspiration was required in one patient due to recurrence of the abscess. The CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses helps achieve all treatment goals. It drains the contents of the abscess, reduces mass effect, and confirms diagnosis. It is minimally invasive, carries minimal morbidity and mortality, and can be performed on compromised patients under local anesthesia.     

Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses

Eleven patients with 12 abdominal abscesses underwent percutaneous insertion of tube drains into the abscess cavities under radiographic control. Once inserted the catheters were managed in the same way as surgically placed drains. Broad-spectrum antibiotic cover was provided. Of the abscesses 10 resolved and 2 required open drainage; 1 of the latter patients improved dramatically on percutaneous drainage. There were 2 deaths, neither of which was related to the procedure.     

Does drainage of intraabdominal pus reverse multiple organ failure?

Intraabdominal abscess induced multiple organ failure in 21 patients. Sepsis was most often due to perforation of the colon and was located with almost equal frequency in the upper and lower abdomen. Four patients died after single laparotomy for drainage. Seventeen were drained operatively more than once (average 3.4 operations) at mean intervals of 10 days. Sixteen of the 21 patients (76 percent) died with multiple organ failure despite drainage. Organ function improved temporarily in only one patient. Autopsy showed that pus had persisted or recurred in three patients. No significant predictors of survival were identified, although the advantage appears to lie with the younger patient in whom multiple organ failure develops relatively late after sepsis (mean 13 days) and who needs ventilatory assistance for less than 1 week. The location, size, and bacteriologic characteristics of abscesses do not appear to influence outcome. This study shows that early and repeated drainage of intraabdominal pus will not reverse multiple organ failure in the majority of patients.     

Drainage of hepatic,intraabdominal, and mediastinal abscesses guided by computerized axial tomography: Successful alternative to open drainage

Open surgical drainage of intraabdominal, intrahepatic, and mediastinal abscesses is well established. Although this may be the procedure of choice when there are indications for treatment of concurrent intraabdominal and mediastinal surgical disease, with the advent of computerized axial tomography and ultrasonography we have identified a patient population best served by percutaneous catheter drainage. The procedure involves precise localization using ultrasound or CAT scanning, fine needle aspiration for confirmation of diagnosis, and injection of radiopaque contrast medium with fluoroscopic observation to localize the abscess. Catheter placement is usually achieved by a Seldinger technique, although a trochar-cannula method is occasionally required. Our experience with 24 patients, as well as review of the world literature provides a cumulative experience of 252 patients, has led us to believe that this approach is successful 83 percent of the time with a minimal incidence of complications. Percutaneous catheter drainage of intrahepatic, intraabdominal, and mediastinal abscesses guided by computerized axial tomography is the treatment of choice in patients who do not have other indications for exploration.     

Pyogenic liver abscess: a review of 10 years' experience in management

BACKGROUND: Over the past 15 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology techniques have allowed accurate localization of liver abscesses and image-guided percutaneous drainage. This review examines whether these technical advances improve clinical results and discusses the selection of treatment for patients with liver abscesses. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients were treated for pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between January 1987 and June 1997. The hospital records were examined and clinical presentation, laboratory, radiological and microbiological findings were recorded. Associations between these findings and failure of initial non-operative management were determined using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Independent predictors were then determined by logistic regression. This analysis was repeated to determine factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Cholelithiasis and previous hepatobiliary surgery were the most frequently identifiable causes of PLA, each responsible in 15 patients. All 98 patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics and in 13 patients this was the only therapy. Of the remaining 85 patients, six proceeded straight to laparotomy and 79 had percutaneous drainage, of whom 15 required subsequent laparotomy. Factors predicting failure of initial non-operative management were unresolving jaundice, renal impairment secondary to clinical deterioration, multiloculation of the abscess, rupture on presentation and biliary communication. The overall hospital mortality rate was 8%. CONCLUSION: Pyogenic liver abscess remains a disease with significant mortality. Image-guided percutaneous drainage is appropriate treatment for single unilocular PLA. Surgical drainage is more likely to be required in patients who have abscess rupture, incomplete percutaneous drainage or who have uncorrected primary pathology.     

PYOGENIC LIVER ABSCESS: A REVIEW OF 10 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE IN MANAGEMENT

Background : Over the past 15 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology techniques have allowed accurate localization of liver abscesses and image-guided percutaneous drainage. This review examines whether these technical advances improve clinical results and discusses the selection of treatment for patients with liver abscesses. Methods : Ninety-eight patients were treated for pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between January 1987 and June 1997. The hospital records were examined and clinical presentation, laboratory, radiological and microbiological findings were recorded. Associations between these findings and failure of initial non-operative management were determined using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Independent predictors were then determined by logistic regression. This analysis was repeated to determine factors associated with mortality. Results : Cholelithiasis and previous hepatobiliary surgery were the most frequently identifiable causes of PLA, each responsible in 15 patients. All 98 patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics and in 13 patients this was the only therapy. Of the remaining 85 patients, six proceeded straight to laparotomy and 79 had percutaneous drainage, of whom 15 required subsequent laparotomy. Factors predicting failure of initial non-operative management were unresolving jaundice, renal impairment secondary to clinical deterioration, multiloculation of the abscess, rupture on presentation and biliary communication. The overall hospital mortality rate was 8%. Conclusion : Pyogenic liver abscess remains a disease with significant mortality. Image-guided percutaneous drainage is appropriate treatment for single unilocular PLA. Surgical drainage is more likely to be required in patients who have abscess rupture, incomplete percutaneous drainage or who have uncorrected primary pathology.     

Intrahepatic pyogenic abscesses: treatment by percutaneous drainage

During a 6 year period, 18 liver abscesses in 12 patients were identified by computerized tomography. Five patients had presumed hematogenous seeding. Five patients previously had bilioenteric anastomoses, stents, or both to relieve obstructive jaundice. Four patients with abscesses had recent abdominal operations. Diagnosis was established by guided needle aspiration and treatment was provided by percutaneous catheter drainage. Organism-specific antibiotics were administered to all patients. Patients were evaluated for recurrence by serial computerized tomographic studies and were clinically followed up for a minimum of 15 months. Ten of 12 patients (83 percent) and 16 of 18 abscesses (89 percent) were successfully treated by percutaneous catheter drainage. Two failures required operative intervention. In summary, the low morbidity and high success rate in treating hepatic abscesses by percutaneous drainage suggests that this therapy be tried before operative intervention is considered.     

Percutaneous catheter versus open surgical drainage in the treatment of abdominal abscesses

In the past 3 years, percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) was performed for 24 abdominal and retroperitoneal abscesses while open surgical drainage (OSD) was used for treatment of 24 similar abscesses at the affiliated hospitals of UMDNJ-Rutgers Medical School. Although the method of treatment was arbitrarily selected by the attending physician, the two groups were similar with respect to abscess location, underlying illnesses, and previous operations. In the PCD group, 17 of 24 abscesses developed after operations versus 16 of 24 in the OSD group. Location of abscesses were: PCD group: abdominal (9), renal (5), pelvic (4), subphrenic (3), hepatic (2), pancreatic (1); OSD group: abdominal (10), renal (4), subphrenic (4), pelvic (3), hepatic (2), pancreatic (1). With PCD, the abscesses were localized by ultrasound or computerized tomography scan; a 20- or 22-gauge needle passed into the cavity, followed by progressively larger guide wires, dilators, and catheters; the pus evacuated; and abscess cavity thoroughly irrigated with sterile saline. Percutaneous catheter drainage was successful in 22 of 24 cases. There were two inconsequential complications. The mean post-PCD hospital stay was 11.7 days. With OSD, five patients developed major complications, including three deaths from sepsis. The mean post-OSD stay for surviving patients was 21.2 days. The advantages of PCD versus OSD are: 1) precise noninvasive localization of abscesses, 2) avoidance of general anesthesia, 3) avoidance of major complications, and 4) shorter postdrainage hospital stay. Open surgical drainage should be reserved for cases where PCD fails to control sepsis, close fistulae, or when noninvasive scanning either fails to demonstrate a discrete abscess in the face of intra-abdominal sepsis or identifies an abscess that cannot be percutaneously drained without traversing the bowel.     

Percutaneous drainage of prostatic abscesses

Percutaneous catheter drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses currently is a well established technique. We report on 2 anuric patients on maintenance hemodialysis who presented with a prostatic abscess. We elected to use a transperineal, percutaneous drainage technique. Adequate drainage was documented by pelvic computerized tomography scans and followup confirmed satisfactory long-term results.