Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics associated with inappropriate hospital use by patients in Manitoba in order to help target concurrent utilization review. Utilization review was developed to reduce inappropriate hospital use but can be a very resource-intensive process. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of a sample of adult patients who received care for medical conditions in a sample of Manitoba hospitals during the fiscal year 1993-94; assessment of patients at admission and for each day of stay with the use of a standardized set of objective, nondiagnosis-based criteria (InterQual). PATIENTS: A total of 3904 patients receiving care at 26 hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute (appropriate) and nonacute (inappropriate) admissions and days of stay for adult patients receiving care for medical conditions. RESULTS: After 1 week, 53.2% of patients assessed as needing acute care at admission no longer required acute care. Patients 75 years of age or older consumed more than 50% of the days of stay, and 74.8% of these days of stay were inappropriate. Four diagnostic categories accounted for almost 60% of admissions and days, and more than 50% of those days of stay were inappropriate. Patients admitted through the emergency department were more likely to require acute care (60.9%) than others (41.7%). Patients who were Treaty Indians had a higher proportion of days of stay requiring acute care than others (45.9% v. 32.8%). Patients' income and day of the week on admission (weekday v. weekend) were not predictive factors of inappropriate use. CONCLUSION: Rather than conducting a utilization review for every patient, hospitals might garner more information by targeting patients receiving care for medical conditions with stays longer than 1 week, patients with nervous system, circulatory, respiratory or digestive diagnoses, elderly patients and patients not admitted through the emergency department.     

The need for acute, subacute, and nonacute care at 105 general hospital sites on Ontario

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of hospital utilization have not taken into account the use of acute care beds for subacute care. The authors determined the proportion of patients who required acute, subacute and nonacute care on admission and during their hospital stay in general hospitals in Ontario. From this analysis, they identified areas where the efficiency of care delivery might be improved. METHODS: Ninety-eight of 189 acute care hospitals in Ontario, at 105 sites, participated in a review that used explicit criteria for rating acuity developed by Inter-Qual Inc., Marlborough, Mass. The records of 13,242 patients who were discharged over a 9-month period in 1995 after hospital care for 1 of 8 high-volume, high-variability diagnoses or procedures were randomly selected for review. Patients were categorized on the basis of the level of care (acute, subacute or nonacute) they required on admission and during subsequent days of hospital care. RESULTS: Of all admissions, 62.2% were acute, 19.7% subacute and 18.1% nonacute. The patients most likely to require acute care on admission were those with acute myocardial infarction (96.2% of 1826 patients) or cerebrovascular accident (84.0% of 1596 patients) and those admitted for elective surgery on the day of their procedure (73.4% of 3993 patients). However, 41.1% of patients awaiting hip or knee replacement were admitted the day before surgery so did not require acute care on admission. The proportion of patients who required acute care on admission and during the subsequent hospital stay declined with age; the proportion of patients needing nonacute care did not vary with age. After admission, acute care was needed on 27.5% of subsequent days, subacute care on 40.2% and nonacute care on 32.3%. The need for acute care on admission was a predictor of need for acute care during subsequent hospital stay among patients with medical conditions. The proportion of patients requiring subacute care during the subsequent hospital stay increased with age, decreased with the number of inpatient beds in each hospital and was highest among patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. INTERPRETATION: In 1995, inpatients requiring subacute care accounted for a substantial proportion of nonacute care days in Ontario's general hospitals. These findings suggest a need to evaluate the efficiencies that might be achieved by introducing a subacute category of care into the Canadian health care system. Generally, efforts are needed to reduce the proportion of admissions for nonacute care and of in-hospital days for other than acute care.     

Inappropriate Use of Hospital Beds in a Tertiary Care Service Hospital

Background

The cost of medical care is continuing to rise and cost containment measures need to focus on inappropriate hospitalization. Armed Forces Medical Services ensure universal access to its consumers but continuous increase in patient load is stretching the capability of service hospitals. The present study was undertaken to determine the rate of inappropriate hospitalization in a large tertiary care service hospital.

Methods

Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was used to assess the appropriateness of hospital days, the study being carried out in the acute medical and acute surgical wards of the hospital on randomly selected days over a period of three months. Results: Inappropriate patient days were found to be 29.48% during the study period, with 34% of acute surgical patient days and 24.4% of acute medical patient days found to be inappropriate. No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of inappropriate hospital stay between serving personnel and ex-servicemen. 31.25% non local patients as compared to 25.81% of local patients were found to have inappropriate hospital stays, though the difference was not found to be statistically significant. 60.71% of inappropriate stays were found in the initial period of admission (1-5 days), the phenomenon being observed both in the acute surgical and acute medical wards.

Conclusion

The study shows that the rate of inappropriate patient days is quite high among the study population and regular utilization reviews need to be carried out to conserve health care resources available with the service hospitals.Key Words: Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP), Inappropriate patient days (IPD)     

Acute medical bed usage by nursing home residents.

An increasing number of elderly patients in nursing home care appears to be presenting to hospital for acute medical admission. A survey of acute hospital care was undertaken to establish accurately the number and character of such admissions. A total of 1300 acute medical beds was surveyed in Northern Ireland in June 1996 and January 1997 on a single day using a standardised proforma. Demographic details, diagnosis and length of admission were recorded. A total of 84 patients over the age of 65 (mean 79.5 years) admitted from nursing home care was identified in June 1996 and a total of 125 (mean 83.3 years) in January 1997. A total of 88 (70%) of admissions in 1997 were accompanied by a general practitioner's letter. The assessing doctor judged that 12 (9.6%) of admissions in 1997 could have had investigations and or treatment reasonably instituted in a nursing home. The proportion of acute medical beds occupied by nursing home residents was 6% in June 1996 rising to 10% in January 1997. The study accurately identifies the significant contribution of nursing home patients to acute medical admissions and the low proportion in whom admission was unnecessary. Closure of long stay hospital facilities should be accompanied by investment in community medical services and also reinvestment in acute hospital care for elderly people.     

Variation in length of stay as a measure of efficiency in Manitoba hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficiency of Manitoba hospitals by analysing variations in length of stay for patients with similar characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective study. Multiple regression analyses were used to adjust for patient (case-mix) characteristics and to identify differences in length of stay attributable to the hospital of admission for 14 specific, frequently encountered diagnostic categories and for all acute admissions. SETTING: The eight major acute care hospitals in Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Manitoba residents admitted to any one of the eight hospitals during the fiscal year 1989-90, 1990-91 or 1991-92. Patients transferred to or from another institution, those with atypically long stays and those who died in hospital were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The length of stay was strongly influenced by hospital of admission, even after adjustment for key patient characteristics. Excluding the most seriously ill patients and those with the longest stays, approximately 186 beds could potentially have been saved if each hospital had discharged its patients as efficiently as the hospital with the shortest overall length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of days currently invested in treating acute care patients could be eliminated. At least some bed closures in Manitoba hospitals could be accommodated simply through more efficient treatment of patients in the remaining beds, without decreasing access to hospital care.     

Interface between residential aged care facilities and a teaching hospital emergency department in Western Australia

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the appropriateness of emergency department (ED) presentations by people aged>or=65 years living in residential care facilities. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of older residents of residential care facilities who presented to the ED of the Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia, between January and June 2002. Data were reviewed by an expert clinical panel. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Appropriateness of ED presentation, presenting complaint, involvement of a general practitioner/locum doctor prior to transfer, proportion of patients admitted to hospital from the ED, survival to discharge. RESULTS: 541 residents aged>or=65 years were transferred by ambulance to the ED, comprising 8.3% of all ED presentations of people in this age group. The mean age of the study cohort was 83.7 years (SD, 7.0 years), of which 68% were women. Of the 541 presentations, 326 (60%) resulted in hospital admission, and of these, 276 (85%) survived to hospital discharge. Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 25% of all presentations, and 22% were falls-related; pneumonia (11% of presentations) was the single largest presenting complaint. ED attendance was deemed "inappropriate" for 71/541 cases (13.1%; 95% CI, 10.5%-16.2%); in only 25% of ED presentations was a GP/locum doctor involved prior to transfer. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ED presentations by aged care residents were considered to be appropriate, but there was scope for improvement in coordinating care between the hospital ED and residential care institutions.     

An audit of blood component therapy in a Canadian general teaching hospital.

As part of a quality assurance program a retrospective audit of transfusion practices for packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma and albumin was undertaken with predetermined criteria in a general teaching hospital. Of 520 transfusion episodes with 1218 units of packed red blood cells given to 297 patients 88% were considered appropriate; of 106 episodes with 405 units of fresh frozen plasma given to 83 patients 90% were deemed appropriate; and of 187 episodes with 320 units of albumin given to 99 patients 64% were considered appropriate. The results of this audit, when compared with those of other surveys of blood use in a similar population, suggest that pretransfusion approval of requested components would reduce the number of inappropriate transfusions.     

Appropriateness of red blood cell transfusion in Australasian intensive care practice

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and appropriateness of use of allogenic packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in Australian and New Zealand intensive care practice. SETTING: Intensive care units of 18 Australian and New Zealand hospitals: March 2001. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicentre study. METHODS: All admissions to participating intensive care units were screened and all patients who received a transfusion of RBC were enrolled. The indications for transfusion were recorded and compared with Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines. Transfusions conforming to these guidelines were deemed appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RBC transfusion in intensive care and transfusion appropriateness. RESULTS: 1808 admissions to intensive care units were screened: 357 (19.8%) admissions (350 patients) received an RBC transfusion while in intensive care. Overall, 1464 RBC units were administered in intensive care on 576 transfusion days. The most common indications for transfusion were acute bleeding (60.1%; 880/1464) and diminished physiological reserve (28.9%; 423/1464). The rate of inappropriate transfusion was 3.0% (44/1464). Diminished physiological reserve with haemogloblin level > or = 100 g/L was the indication in 50% (22/44) of inappropriate transfusions; no indication was provided for 31% (15/44). CONCLUSION: The rate of inappropriate transfusion in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units in 2001 was remarkably low.     

Predicting outcome after appendicectomy

Aim To validate an intraoperative appendicitis severity score (IASS) and examine outcome following emergency appendectomy. Methods A prospective study was undertaken, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. Data were obtained independently on preoperative Alvarado scores, IASS (0-3: 0 no inflammation, 1 engorged appendix/no peritonitis, 2 peritoneal reaction/exudate or 3 evidence of perforation/abscess) and postoperative outcome parameters. Results There were 149 patients identified with a mean age of 20.7 years. There was no association between Alvarado score and length of hospital stay, septic complication, patient sex or duration of symptoms (p>0.05). IASS was found to be an independent risk factor for septic complication, wound infection (p<0.05) and length of hospital stay (p<0.001). There was no correlation between preoperative duration of symptoms or time until surgery and intraoperative score. Conclusions This simple scoring system can identify patients more likely to suffer morbidity following emergency appendicectomy. Specifically, this system identifies patients who have a high risk of sepsis and therefore could be of use when comparing healthcare performance.     

The early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Comparison of a simple algorithm with a computer program for electrocardiogram interpretation

The sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation by a simple algorithm was compared with a computer read ECG machine. Clinical data and ECG findings on 264 consecutive patients admitted to a coronary care unit with suspected acute myocardial infarction were prospectively entered into an algorithm with 13 end-points. These end-points were compared with the interpretations of a computer read ECG machine (Marquette MAC PC). 86 patients (32.5%) had confirmed acute infarction. 85% of those with infarction had some form of ST elevation on their initial ECG. Patients with ST elevation presented earlier (4.9 ± 4.9 versus 8.0 ± 9.7 hours after symptom onset, p<0.001), and were older (66.5 ± 11.0 versus 62.0 ± 12.5 years, p <0.01) than those without infarction. According to the algorithm 94.2% of patients with infarction had some form of ECG abnormality, compared with 55.6% of those without infarction (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the algorithm was 92.3% of the area of the graph. This was more (p<0.01) than the area under the ROC curve of the interpretations of the computer read ECG machine (83.9%). Marked ST elevation with reciprocal changes was the most specific indicators of infarction (Likelihood ratio 51.7). The algorithm, therefore, was comparatively sensitive and specific in the early diagnosis of acute infarction.     

How do physicians adapt when the coronary care unit is full? A prospective multicenter study

Reducing the numbers of coronary care unit (CCU) beds would decrease expensive unnecessary admissions, but might also block appropriate admissions. To study how physicians adapt to limited CCU beds, we compared their decisions to admit patients to the CCU when the CCU was full with those made when the CCU was not full. We studied 4479 patients who presented with symptoms suggesting acute cardiac ischemia to six New England hospital emergency rooms over 16 months. Of the 2931 patients found on follow-up not to have acute ischemia, 33% of those presenting when the CCU was not full were admitted to the CCU vs 24% of such patients presenting when the CCU was full (P = .0005), a 27% drop. Of the 725 patients proving to have angina pectoris, 74% of those presenting when the CCU was not full were admitted to the CCU vs 62% of such patients presenting when the CCU was full (P = .007), a 16% reduction. Of the 823 patients found to have myocardial infarction, 90% were admitted to the CCU both when the CCU was not full and when it was full. Importantly, for no group did mortality increase when the CCU was full. These data suggest that physicians can safely adapt to substantial reductions in the availability of CCU beds.     

Comparison of long-term care in an acute care institution and in a long-term care institution

BACKGROUND: Acute care hospitals in Quebec are required to reserve 10% of their beds for patients receiving long-term care while awaiting transfer to a long-term care facility. It is widely believed that this is inefficient because it is more costly to provide long-term care in an acute care hospital than in one dedicated to long-term care. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality and cost of long-term care in an acute care hospital and in a long-term care facility. METHODS: A concurrent cross-sectional study was conducted of 101 patients at the acute care hospital and 102 patients at the long-term care hospital. The 2 groups were closely matched in terms of age, sex, nursing care requirements and major diagnoses. Several indicators were used to assess the quality of care: the number of medical specialist consultations, drugs, biochemical tests and radiographic examinations; the number of adverse events (reportable incidents, nosocomial infections and pressure ulcers); and anthropometric and biochemical indicators of nutritional status. Costs were determined for nursing personnel, drugs and biochemical tests. A longitudinal study was conducted of 45 patients who had been receiving long-term care at the acute care hospital for at least 5 months and were then transferred to the long-term care facility where they remained for at least 6 months. For each patient, the number of adverse events, the number of medical specialist consultations and the changes in activities of daily living status were assessed at the 2 institutions. RESULTS: In the concurrent study, no differences in the number of adverse events were observed; however, patients at the acute care hospital received more drugs (5.9 v. 4.7 for each patient, p < 0.01) and underwent more tests (299 v. 79 laboratory units/year for each patient, p < 0.001) and radiographic examinations (64 v. 46 per 1000 patient-weeks, p < 0.05). At both institutions, 36% of the patients showed anthropometric and biochemical evidence of protein-calorie undernutrition; 28% at the acute care hospital and 27% at the long-term care hospital had low serum iron and low transferrin saturation, compatible with iron deficiency. The longitudinal study showed that there were more consultations (61 v. 37 per 1000 patient-weeks, p < 0.02) and fewer pressure ulcers (18 v. 34 per 1000 patient-weeks, p < 0.05) at the acute care hospital than at the long-term care facility; other measures did not differ. The cost per patient-year was $7580 higher at the acute care hospital, attributable to the higher cost of drugs ($42), the greater use of laboratory tests ($189) and, primarily, the higher cost of nursing ($7349). For patients requiring 3.00 nursing hours/day, the acute care hospital provided more hours than the long-term care facility (3.59 v. 3.03 hours), with a higher percentage of hours from professional nurses rather than auxiliary nurses or nursing aides (62% v. 28%). The nurse staffing pattern at the acute care hospital was characteristic of university-affiliated acute care hospitals. INTERPRETATION: The long-term care provided in the acute care hospital involved a more interventionist medical approach and greater use of professional nurses (at a significantly higher cost) but without any overall difference in the quality of care.     

An audit of the effect of intravenous antibiotic treatment on spirometric measures of pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis

Background  This retrospective audit was undertaken to compare the efficacy of home intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, hospital IV antibiotic therapy and a combination of these 2 approaches, as determined by spirometric measures of lung function in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, each with an acute respiratory exacerbation. Methods  Pulmonary function, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow rate between 25 per cent and 75 per cent of vital capacity (FEF_25–75), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were compared between groups at the beginning and at the end of an IV antibiotic course. Results  Treatment of exacerbations resulted in a significant improvement (p<0.05) in lung function irrespective of where patients were treated. The percentage improvement in FEV₁, FVC, and FEF_25–75, were significantly greater in patients treated in hospital compared to those who had home IV treatment (p<0.05). Conclusion  Hospital IV antibiotic therapy resulted in greater improvements in FEV₁, FVC and FEF_25–75 than home IV antibiotic therapy in CF patients with an acute respiratory infection.     

Outpatient follow up appointments; Are we using the resources effectively?

Objective

British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) guidelines and government initiatives have put pressure on the effective use of outpatient resources. Follow up appointments need to be carefully managed to ensure efficient use of available resources. The aim of this study was to audit outpatient follow up service with particular attention to the appropriateness of the appointments made.

Methods

All patients attending a general urology clinic were assessed by a form completed for each individual appointment. The source of the appointment and the time interval was recorded and each follow up appointment was judged to be either appropriate or inappropriate by the person giving the consultation. For those deemed to be inappropriate, justification was sought and the notes independently reviewed by a different clinician to verify this categorisation.

Results

Of 164 appointments made, 143 patients attended for follow up. A total of 131 appointments were considered to be appropriate (92%) with only 12 deemed by the consulting clinician to be inappropriate (8%). The commonest cause for an inappropriate appointment was failure to appreciate that follow up had already been arranged for a different date. There was no correlation between the source of the referral and an inappropriate referral.

Conclusion

This audit suggests an effective use of the outpatient follow up resource with respect to the appropriateness and timing of follow up consultations. Other areas of resource management such as default rates should be investigated in an attempt to improve the efficiency of a service.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin utilization in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin IVIG utilization at King Khalid University Hospital, an 850 bed tertiary care academic center, over a-3-year period. METHODS: Patients who received IVIG in the period from January 2003 to December 2005 at King Khalid University Hospital were identified retrospectively using the hospital computer system. Their charts were subsequently reviewed. We collected data pertaining to patients' demographics, indication of IVIG, dose regimen and physician specialty. Indications were categorized into 4 different categories: US Food and Drug Administration FDA-labeled; off-label recommended as first line; off-label recommended as alternative; and not recommended. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were identified. Intravenous immunoglobulin was given to 109 (35.7%) patients for FDA-labeled indications, 29 (9.5%) patients for off-label recommended as first line indications, 97 (31.8%) for off-label recommended as alternative indications, and 70 (23%) for not recommended indications. The amount of IVIG consumed during the study period was 43.65 Kgs with an estimated cost of $1.75 million, 24.4% of which was considered inappropriate use. Hematologists and neurologists were the most frequent prescribers. CONCLUSION: A significant amount of IVIG was prescribed for inappropriate indications. This had a large financial burden on an already strained hospital budget.     

Iron deficiency anaemia in general practice: clinical outcomes over three years and factors influencing diagnostic investigations

Background: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) may be a sign of significant gastrointestinal disease, and delayed diagnosis may result in chronic morbidity. Studies in patients referred to hospital for investigation of their anaemia have shown that 5%–15% have a gastrointestinal cancer but there are few studies of patients presenting to primary care. Factors influencing further investigation in these patients have not previously been identified. Patients and methods: A cohort of patients presenting to their general practitioners (GPs) with IDA was identified and clinical outcomes recorded. Logistic regression was used to determine which factors influenced GPs to investigate the anaemia. Results: 43% of patients had investigations within three months and serious pathology was found in 30% of these; 13% of patients were considered unfit for further investigation and 8% refused to have any. Independent predictors of non-investigation were a mild anaemia (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.61, p<0.001), female gender (OR 0.49, CI 0.3 to 0.8, p = 0.004), a previous history of anaemia (OR 0.39, CI 0.24 to 0.64, p<0.001), and age <65 years (OR 0.44, CI 0.26 to 0.74, p = 0.002). During the entire study period gastrointestinal cancer was diagnosed in 48 patients (11%); 17% of men had colorectal cancer. Of 263 patients alive at 12 months without a confirmed diagnosis, 113 (43%) had recurrent or persistent anaemia during the study period. Conclusion: Although the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal cancer in patients presenting to primary care is similar to that seen in secondary care, the diagnosis may be delayed due to lack of appropriate investigations resulting in significant morbidity.     

Analysis of blood tests in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital

There is ample evidence that many investigations sent from the accident and emergency department are inappropriate, thus affecting the quality of patient care. A study was designed to address this issue in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital of a large city. A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out during the 3-month period 1 December 1996 to 28 February 1997. A set of guidelines was used to assess the appropriateness of different blood tests for the initial assessment of the patients presenting with common clinical conditions, although any investigation could be done if considered important for patient management. All other blood tests were considered inappropriate. A total of 6401 patients were seen in the emergency department and 14,300 blood tests were done on 3529 patients with diagnoses covered by the guidelines. Of these 62.2% were found to be inappropriate. Of the total 22,655 investigations done on all the 6401 patients seen, only 3.8% influenced the diagnosis, 3.0% influenced patient care in the emergency department, and 4.0% influenced the decision to admit or not. Amylase and arterial blood gases were found to be the most appropriate investigations. Analysis of reasons for unnecessary use of emergency tests suggested that improving supervision, decreasing the utilization of the emergency department as a phlebotomy service for the hospital, and abolition of routine blood tests would help to improve patient care.     

"Homeward bound": a minimal care rehabilitation unit

A 20 bed minimal care rehabilitation unit was set up by Newham District Health Authority in a small hospital originally scheduled for closure when a new district general hospital was opened. During the first year 114 patients were admitted (throughput 5.7), with a median length of stay of 30 days; in the second year 173 patients were admitted (throughput 8.65) with a median length of stay of 28.5 days. The cost per inpatient day was less than that of an inpatient day at the district's long stay geriatric unit. Before the unit opened 24% of the acute beds had been occupied for more than six weeks, whereas two years later only 6% of the acute beds were occupied for such a period.     

How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?

BACKGROUND: Despite their widespread acceptance, utilization review tools, which were designed to assess the appropriateness of care in acute care hospitals, have not been well validated in Canada. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of 3 such tools--ISD (Intensity of service, Severity of illness, Discharge screens), AEP (Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol) and MCAP (Managed Care Appropriateness Protocol)--as determined by their agreement with the clinical judgement of a panel of experts. METHODS: The cases of 75 patients admitted to an acute cardiology service were reviewed retrospectively. The criteria of each utilization review tool were applied by trained reviewers to each day the patients spent in hospital. An abstract of each case prepared in a day-by-day format was evaluated independently by 3 cardiologists, using clinical judgement to decide the appropriateness of each day spent in hospital. RESULTS: The panel considered 92% of the admissions and 67% of the subsequent hospital days to be appropriate. The ISD underestimated the appropriateness rates of admission and subsequent days; the AEP and MCAP overestimated the appropriateness rate of subsequent days in hospital. The kappa statistic of overall agreement between tool and panel was 0.45 for ISD, 0.24 for MCAP and 0.25 for AEP, indicating poor to fair validity of the tools. INTERPRETATION: Published validation studies had average kappa values of 0.32-0.44 (i.e., poor to fair) for admission days and for subsequent days in hospital for the 3 tools. The tools have only a low level of validity when compared with a panel of experts, which raises serious doubts about their usefulness for utilization review.     

Six-year retrospective study of bull-riding injuries in central Queensland

Background

Bull riding is an increasingly popular and growing professional sport in Australia. This is the first national study that investigates bull riding-related injuries.

Method

A six-year retrospective study of patients admitted to Rockhampton Base Hospital with acute injuries sustained whilst bull riding. Patients were identified from the Rockhampton Hospital international coding system and surgical audit excel databases. Supporting information was found from patient chart review.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were admitted during the study. Injuries increased from 2008. The most common injuries were to limbs (52%), chest (15%) and brain (10%). Life- threatening injuries were all caused by a direct kick or trampling by the bull; 5% of patients needed air transfer to Brisbane, and 10% to Rockhampton for their acute care. The only complication was infection of open wounds. The average hospital stay was 2.2 (range= 1-5, SD= 1.1) days and 64% of patients required operative intervention.

Conclusion

Patients that had been kicked or trampled should be identified as having potentially life-threatening injuries, and transferred for review at an appropriate facility. Due to the high risk of infection all contaminated wounds should be washed out formally and receive antibiotics. Protective equipment should be encouraged among riders.