Intrathymic immunomodulation in sensitized rat recipients of cardiac allografts: requirements for allorecognition pathways.

BACKGROUND: Intrathymic injection of alloantigen in the form of donor cells, soluble major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, or MHC allopeptides induces donor-specific tolerance in a variety of acute allograft rejection models. We have previously shown that a single intrathymic injection of donor spleen cells into pre-sensitized rats abrogates accelerated (circa 24-hour) rejection and prolongs the survival of cardiac allografts to about 7 days. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms by which intrathymic administration of donor cells modifies the course of accelerated rejection. METHODS: Lewis RT1(1) (LEW) rats sensitized by transplantation with Wistar-Furth RT1(u) (WF) skin grafts received WF cardiac allografts 7 days later-a classic model of accelerated rejection. At the time of skin challenge, however, certain animals received intrathymic cell suspensions (either allogeneic or syngeneic) or donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC peptides. RESULTS: Control animals (sensitized by skin grafts but receiving no other treatment) rejected cardiac allografts within 24 hours. Intrathymic injection of WF splenocytes at the time of skin transplantation abrogated rejection at 24 hours and prolonged cardiac allograft survival to 6.6+/-0.6 days (p<0.001), whereas intrathymic administration of syngeneic (LEW) or allogeneic third party Brown Norway RT1(n) cells was ineffective in this regard. Intrathymic injection of gamma-irradiated donor cells marginally extended cardiac allograft survival to 3.0+/-0.9 days (p< 0.001), but the grafts were still rejected in an accelerated fashion. Intrathymic injection of donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC allopeptides at the same time period also failed to prolong cardiac allograft survival beyond 3 days. In the group receiving unmodified donor cells, elevated immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) allo-antibodies were found at the time of cardiac transplantation; this pattern was not observed with any other treatment. CONCLUSION: The superiority of non-modified donor spleen cells over gamma-irradiated donor cells or donor specific allopeptides in modifying the course of accelerated cardiac rejection suggests that direct allorecognition is the dominant pathway initiating rejection in sensitized transplant recipients. Marked alterations in the antidonor IgM and IgG responses are associated with successful abrogation of accelerated rejection by thymic immunomodulatory mechanisms.     

Indirect Recognition of MHC Class I Allopeptides Accelerates Lung Allograft Rejection in Miniature Swine

The role of indirect allorecognition in graft rejection is examined in two experiments using a swine lung transplantation model. First, two swine received class I mismatched grafts without immunosuppression; another two recipients were treated postoperatively with cyclosporine (CsA). These swine exhibited acute and chronic rejection, respectively. All four recipients developed T-cell reactivity to donor-derived class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) peptides. Second, six swine were immunized with synthetic donor-derived class I allopeptides prior to transplantation. Control groups consisted of nonimmunized recipients (n = 6) and recipients immunized with an irrelevant peptide (n = 3). These recipients all received a 12-day course of post-operative CsA. Swine immunized with allopeptides exhibited accelerated graft rejection, as compared to both control groups (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Within the experimental group, the dominant histologic finding was acute rejection (AR). Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) was seen in the graft with the longest survival. Both control groups showed a lesser degree of AR, with four out of six nonimmunized swine ultimately developing OB. These studies suggest that indirect allorecognition is operative during lung allograft rejection, and that pre-transplant sensitization to donor-derived MHC allopeptides can accelerate graft rejection.     

The role of indirect recognition of MHC class I and II allopeptides in a fully mismatched miniature swine model of lung transplantation

Considerable evidence suggests that indirect recognition of MHC allopeptides plays an important role in solid-organ rejection. Here, we examine whether immunization with class I or class II allopeptides accelerates rejection in a fully MHC-mismatched lung transplant model in miniature swine. METHODS: Recipients were immunized with either donor-derived class I or class II peptides. Sensitization to the peptides was confirmed by DTH testing and in vitro proliferation assays. Nonimmunized control (n = 6), class I peptide-immunized (n = 3), and class II peptide-immunized (n = 3) swine were transplanted with fully mismatched lungs using only a 12-day course of tacrolimus. RESULTS: One control animal rejected its graft on postoperative day 103, while the others maintained their grafts for over 1 year. In the class I peptide-immunized group, two recipients rejected their grafts (days 14 and 52). The third animal has not rejected the graft (day 120, experiment is ongoing). In contrast, in the class II-peptide immunized group, only one animal rejected its graft on day 52, while the others maintained their grafts over 1 year. Both anti-donor IgM and IgG antibodies were detectable in all acute rejectors, although no alloantibody was detectable in long-term acceptors. Regardless of the fate of the graft, all animals have maintained their proliferative responses to the peptides. However, only acceptors maintained donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in cell-mediated lymphocytotoxity and mixed lymphocyte reaction assays. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant sensitization of lung allograft recipients to donor allopeptides accelerates graft rejection. This appears particularly true for class I-derived allopeptides, suggesting that class II molecules may be less antigenic when presented indirectly.     

Indirect allorecognition of donor class I and II major histocompatibility complex peptides promotes the development of transplant vasculopathy.

Recent clinical and experimental evidence suggests that indirect allorecognition may promote the development of chronic rejection, but definitive experimental studies are lacking. To study the contribution of indirect allorecognition to chronic rejection, na?ve Lewis (RT1(1)) rats were immunized with synthetic Wistar Furth (WF) class II-RT1(u).D (HLA-DR-like) or -RT1(u).B (HLA-DQ-like) or class I-RT1(u).A (HLA-A-like) peptides emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant 7 d before transplantation (n = 5 to 7/group). Experimental and control animals then acted as recipients of fully mismatched WF vascularized cardiac allografts. Recipients received immunosuppression in the form of cyclosporine at a tapering dose that allows for long-term allograft survival. Animals were sacrificed at either 3 or 6 mo, with allograft arterial luminal occlusion scored on elastin stains by a blinded observer. At 3 mo, mean vessel scores were significantly higher in the RT1(u).A-immunized versus class II-immunized and control groups (P < 0.05). By 6 mo, there was progression of chronic allograft vasculopathy and a significantly higher mean vessel score in the RT1(u).A- and RT1(u).D-immunized versus RT1(u).B and control groups (P < 0.05). In vitro studies show evidence of shifting MHC allopeptide immunogenicity. It was concluded that T cells primed by specific donor class I and II MHC allopeptides promote the development of chronic vascularized allograft rejection. These novel observations provide definitive evidence of a link between indirect allorecognition and the development and progression of chronic rejection.     

The Indirect Alloresponse Impairs the Induction but Not Maintenance of Tolerance to MHC Class I-Disparate Allografts

We studied the effects of indirect allorecognition on the induction and maintenance phases of tolerance in miniature swine cotransplanted with heart and kidney allografts. MHC class I-mismatched heart and kidney grafts were cotransplanted in recipients receiving CyA for 12 days. Recipients were unimmunized or immunized with a set of donor-derived or control third-party MHC class I peptides either 21 days prior to transplantation or over 100 days after transplantation. T-cell proliferation, delayed type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH) and antibody production were assessed. All animals injected with donor MHC class I peptides developed potent indirect alloresponses specific to the immunizing peptides. While untreated recipients developed stable tolerance, all animals preimmunized with donor allopeptides rejected kidney–heart transplants acutely. In contrast, when peptide immunization was delayed until over 100 days after kidney–heart transplantation, no effects were observed on graft function or in vitro measures of alloimmunity. Donor peptide immunization prevented tolerance when administered to recipients pre transplantation but did not abrogate tolerance when administered to long-term survivors post transplantation. This suggests that the presence of T cells activated via indirect allorecognition represent a barrier to the induction but not the maintenance of tolerance.     

Lack of correlation between the induction of donor class I and class II major histocompatibility complex antigens and graft rejection

The induction of donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens on nonrejected and rejected rat renal allografts was compared at various times after transplantation in two strain combinations, DA-to-PVG and LEW-to-DA. Graft rejection was prevented by preoperative donor-specific blood transfusion (DST). Quantitative absorption analysis and immunohistology were performed using monoclonal antibodies specific for donor class I and class II MHC antigens. A significant increase in the expression of donor MHC antigens, both class I and class II, was demonstrated on nonrejected as well as rejected kidneys after transplantation. A kinetic analysis showed that induction of donor class I antigens was accelerated on the nonrejected grafts, and by day 5 the nonrejected kidneys showed increased expression of class I antigen when compared with the rejected grafts (a 37- vs. a 25-fold increase in expression). Increased expression of donor class I antigens persisted on the nonrejected grafts and was still detectable on long-term-surviving kidneys, 50 days after transplantation. The magnitude of class II antigen induction was similar on both rejected and nonrejected grafts (8-fold by 5 days after transplantation). Immunohistology demonstrated that class I and class II antigens were induced on identical structures in the kidney in both situations. In particular the vessel endothelia, which do not express class II antigens in normal kidney, become strongly positive in both rejected and nonrejected grafts 5 days after transplantation. Although renal allograft rejection is completely suppressed in rats given a single donor-specific blood transfusion before transplantation, graft survival cannot be explained by the lack of induction of donor MHC antigens. Donor MHC antigens are induced on these nonrejected kidney grafts, and therefore they could act as target molecules for the effector cells that mediate graft destruction. Thus the induction of donor MHC antigens on tissue allografts should not be considered as indicative of a rejection response resulting in graft destruction.     

IL-4 deficiency prevents eosinophilic rejection and uncovers a role for neutrophils in the rejection of MHC class II disparate skin grafts

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection of MHC class II-disparate bm12 skin grafts by C57BL/6 recipient mice is characterized by massive graft infiltration by eosinophils, together with increased intragraft amounts of IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA. IL-5 blockade prevents the intragraft eosinophil infiltration and prolongs the survival of skin allografts. As the differentiation of T cell precursors into Th2 cells is largely driven by IL-4, we investigated the role of IL-4 in MHC class II-disparate allograft rejection. METHODS: We performed skin grafts from MHC class II incompatible bm12 mice into wild-type C57BL/6 mice (IL-4) or C57BL/6 IL-4 deficient mice (IL-4). Graft survival, in vitro T cell reactivity, and histology were compared. RESULTS: We observed that 50% of IL-4 mice rapidly rejected their bm12 allograft, whereas the other 50% retained their graft 60 days after transplantation. Histological examination of bm12 allografts retained by IL-4 mice showed a normal appearance with no inflammatory infiltrate and no eosinophils. Among IL-4 mice that acutely rejected their bm12 skin graft, we observed a dense polymorphonuclear infiltrate. The depletion of neutrophils significantly prolonged bm12 graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophil infiltrates, typical of MHC class II disparate acute skin graft rejection, are critically dependent on the availability of IL-4. IL-4 mice reject MHC class II disparate skin grafts by a pathway of rejection where neutrophils play a direct causal role.     

Pathways of helper CD4 T cell allorecognition in generating alloantibody and CD8 T cell alloimmunity

BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of the "direct" and "indirect" pathways of CD4 T cell allorecognition in providing help for generating effective humoral and CD8 T cell alloimmunity remain unclear. Here, the generation of alloantibody and cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses to a vascularized allograft were examined in a murine adoptive-transfer model in which help could only be provided by transferred CD4 T cells recognizing alloantigen exclusively through the direct pathway. METHODS: Rejection kinetics and the development of alloantibody and cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses to MHC-mismatched H-2d heart grafts were compared when CD4 T cell help was present (wild-type H-2d recipients), or absent (CD4 T cell deficient, MHC class II-/- H-2b recipients [B6CII-/-]), or available only through the direct pathway (B6CII-/- mice reconstituted with wild-type CD4 T cells). RESULTS: BALB/c allografts were rejected by B6 mice rapidly (median survival time [MST] 7 days) with strong CD8 T cell effector and alloantibody responses, but were rejected by B6CII-/- mice more slowly (MST 23 days), with markedly reduced CD8 T cell responses and no detectable alloantibody. CD4 T cell reconstitution of B6CII-/- recipients accelerated heart graft rejection to near that of wild-type recipients (MST 13 days), with complete restoration of cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses but without detectable IgM or IgG alloantibody. CONCLUSIONS: Different pathways of helper T cell allorecognition are responsible for generating humoral and CD8 T cell alloimmunity. CD4 T cell help provided exclusively through the direct pathway generates strong cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses that effect rapid heart graft rejection.     

Development of autoimmunity after skin graft rejection via an indirect alloresponse

BACKGROUND: T cell allorecognition occurs through direct contact with donor peptide: MHC complexes on graft cells and through indirect recognition of donor-derived determinants expressed by recipient MHC molecules. As both indirect allorecognition and autoantigen recognition are self-restricted, we hypothesized that chronic activation of indirectly primed T cells might result in determinant spreading to involve autoantigens, analogous to that which occurs during chronic autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We placed C57BL/6 MHC II knockout (B6 II-/-) skin grafts onto BALB/c SCID mice reconstituted with wild-type (WT) CD4+ T cells. Under these conditions the CD4+ cells could not recognize any antigen on the graft, but could respond through the indirect pathway. CD4+ cell-mediated rejection of WT B6 skin was studied to determine if autoreactivity was induced after direct allorecognition. Recall immune responses against donor- and self-stimulator cells were determined by ELISPOT and animals were tested for their ability to reject second isografts. RESULTS: WT allografts were rejected by day 14 although B6 II-/- grafts underwent delayed rejection over 4-5 weeks. CD4+ cells reisolated from the recipients of the MHC II-/- grafts, but not from the recipients of WT grafts, vigorously produced interferon-gamma and interleukin-2 in response to self, BALB/c stimulators. These autoreactive CD4+ T cells mediated rejection of a second isogenic BALB/c skin graft, demonstrating that the autoimmune response was pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Autoreactivity can develop after transplant rejection via the indirect pathway. Although the direct alloresponse is likely to be the driving force in acute graft rejection, posttransplantation induced autoimmune responses may be important elements of delayed or chronic rejection.     

Chronic rejection of mouse kidney allografts

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft rejection is the leading cause of late graft failure. However, its pathogenesis has not been defined. METHODS: To explore the pathogenesis of chronic rejection, we studied a mouse model of kidney transplantation and examined the effects of altering the expression of donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens on the development of chronic rejection. RESULTS: We found that long-surviving mouse kidney allografts develop pathological abnormalities that resemble chronic rejection in humans. Furthermore, the absence of MHC class I or class II antigens did not prevent the loss of graft function nor alter the pathological characteristics of chronic rejection. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), a pleiotropic cytokine suggested to play a role in chronic rejection, was markedly enhanced in control allografts compared with isografts. However, TGF-beta up-regulation was significantly blunted in MHC-deficient grafts. Nonetheless, these differences in TGF-beta expression did not affect the character of chronic rejection, including intrarenal accumulation of collagens. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced expression of either class I or II direct allorecognition pathways is insufficient to prevent the development of chronic rejection, despite a reduction in the levels of TGF-beta expressed in the allograft. This suggests that the severity of chronic rejection is independent of the level of MHC disparity between donor and recipient and the level of TGF-beta expression within the allograft.     

Chronic antagonism of Mig inhibits cellular infiltration and promotes survival of class II MHC disparate skin allografts

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to test the ability of monokine induced by IFN-gamma (Mig)-specific antibodies to inhibit long-term T cell infiltration into class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) disparate skin allografts and to test cellular and molecular changes in the graft during the rejection observed following cessation of treatment. METHODS: C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12 skin grafts were treated with normal rabbit serum (NRS) or rabbit Mig antiserum (Mig AS) every other day from day 7 until day 21 posttransplant and then weekly thereafter. Allografts were retrieved during the course of treatment and following cessation. Tissue sections were prepared and stained to compare infiltration by macrophages and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and to assess collagen deposition in the grafts. RNA was prepared and tested by ribonuclease protection assay for intragraft levels of Mig, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES). RESULTS: T cell and macrophage infiltration into allografts was inhibited and graft survival maintained as long as Mig-specific antibodies were given. Following cessation of treatment, T cells and macrophages infiltrated the allografts. In contrast to the histology of acute rejection observed in allografts from NRS-treated recipients, the resulting rejection of the allografts from Mig AS-treated recipients was accompanied by dense collagen deposition and high level expression of Mig and RANTES. CONCLUSIONS: Mig directs T cell infiltration into B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts on C57BL/6 recipients. Delayed T cell and macrophage infiltration and rejection of the grafts following cessation of Mig AS treatment results in rejection that is histologically and molecularly distinct from acute rejection.     

Trafficking of donor-derived bone marrow correlates with chimerism and extension of composite allograft survival across MHC barrier

We proposed to evaluate differences between recipient's immune response to vascularized skin and combined vascularized skin/bone allografts, under a 7-day alphabeta-TCR plus cyclosporine (CsA) treatment protocol. Thirty-six transplantations were performed in six groups: group I (isograft control-vascularized skin graft; n=6); group II (isograft control-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6); group III (allograft rejection control group-vascularized skin graft; n=6); group IV (allograft rejection control-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6); group V (allograft treatment-vascularized skin graft; n=6); and group VI (allograft treatment-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6). Isograft transplantations were performed between Lewis rats and allografts were transplanted across the MHC barrier from Brown Norway to Lewis rats. In the allograft treatment group, a combined alphabeta-TCR+CsA protocol was applied for 7 days. All groups were compared clinically, immunologically and histologically. Statistical significance was determined with two-tailed Student's t test. Indefinite graft survival was achieved in the isograft control group (>300 days). Allograft rejection controls rejected within 5 to 9 days posttransplant; chimerism levels were undetectable (<.5%). Allografts under the alphabeta-TCR+CsA protocol had significantly extended survival when skin was combined with bone (61-125 days) compared to vascularized skin allografts (43-61 days). Lymphoid macrochimerism was significantly higher in group VI than group V. Histology confirmed skin and bone viability. Combined vascularized skin/bone allografts had higher and sustained levels of donor-specific chimerism and extended allograft survival.     

CD4+ T cells are sufficient to elicit allograft rejection and major histocompatibility complex class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice

BACKGROUND: We characterized the role of T cell subsets and major histocompatibility complex molecules in allograft rejection and recurrence of autoimmune diabetes. METHODS: Adoptive cell transfer and vascularized segmental pancreas transplantation were performed in mice. RESULTS: In an alloimmune response model, transfer of nondiabetic CD4, but not CD8 T cells, elicited pancreas allograft rejection in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic NOD/scid mice. Pancreas allografts were acutely rejected in STZ-induced diabetic NOD/beta2m mice (confirmed the absence of major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class I and CD8 T cells) and permanently accepted in NOD/CIIT mice (confirmed the absence of MHC class II and CD4 T cells). The results suggest that rejection of pancreas allograft is CD4-dependent and MHC class I-independent. In the autoimmune diabetes model, whole spleen cells obtained from diabetic NOD mice induced autoimmune diabetes in NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT mice, but the onset of diabetes was delayed in NOD/beta2m mice. However, the purified diabetic T cells failed to elicit autoimmune diabetes in NOD/beta2m mice. NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT pancreas grafts were acutely destroyed whereas four of six NOD/beta2m pancreas grafts were permanently accepted in autoimmune diabetic NOD mice. CONCLUSION: CD4 T cells are sufficient for the induction of allograft rejection, and MHC class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice.     

Chronic renal allograft rejection. Selective involvement of the glomerular endothelium in humoral immune reactivity and intravascular coagulation

To study immune reactive and thrombotic mechanisms involved in chronic renal allograft rejection, Lewis rat kidneys were transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized Brown Norway recipients tolerant of LEW erythrocyte antigens. Such BN rats fail to produce anti class I MHC alloantibodies after insertion of a LEW kidney. The LEW renal allografts experience a transient rejection episode without proteinuria followed by the development of chronic rejection, clinically characterized by glomerular proteinuria in the presence of stable renal function. Immunohistological studies of such chronically rejected LEW renal allografts showed the occurrence of glomerular and interstitial infiltration of predominantly monocytes and T cells. CD4-positive T cells dominated over CD8-positive T cells in the chronically rejected LEW renal grafts. IgG deposition was found deposited throughout the renal vasculature--this in contrast to IgM, which was observed only in the glomerular vasculature. Glomerular antibodies were not directed to endothelial class II MHC antigens, and showed only weak complement fixation as demonstrated by C3 staining. Selective glomerular IgM deposition was associated with vascular (platelet-containing) thrombi, and focal and segmental fibrinoid necrosis. In contrast, acutely rejected LEW renal grafts in unmodified BN recipients showed IgM deposition as well as thrombus formation throughout the entire renal vasculature. The results demonstrate that the antibody response to endothelial--and, in particular, glomerular endothelial non-MHC antigens--may bring about chronic vascular renal allograft rejection. How the formation of glomerular thrombotic lesions may be assisted by endothelial reactivity to cytokines from local immune reactive cells is discussed.     

Down-regulation of the immune response to histocompatibility antigens and prevention of sensitization by skin allografts by orally administered alloantigen.

The effects of oral administration of major histocompatibility antigens on the alloimmune response have not been investigated. Lymphocytes from inbred LEW (RT1u) rats that were pre-fed allogeneic WF (RT1l) splenocytes exhibited significant antigen specific reduction of the mixed lymphocyte response in vitro and delayed-type hypersensitivity response in vivo, when compared with unfed controls. In an accelerated allograft rejection model, LEW rats were presensitized with BN (RT1n) skin allografts 7 days before challenging them with (LEW x BN)F1 or BN vascularized cardiac allografts. While sensitized control animals hyperacutely reject their cardiac allografts within 2 days, animals prefed with BN splenocytes maintained cardiac allograft survival to 7 days, a time similar to that observed in unsensitized control recipients. This phenomenon was antigen-specific, as third-party WF grafts were rejected within 2 days. Immunohistologic examination of cardiac allografts harvested on day 2 from the fed animals had markedly reduced deposition of IgG, IgM, C3, and fibrin. In addition, there were significantly fewer cellular infiltrates of total white blood cells, neutrophils, macrophages, T cells, IL-2 receptor-positive T cells, and mononuclear cells with positive staining for the activation cytokines IL-2 and IFN-g. On day 6 posttransplant, the grafts from fed animals showed immunohistologic changes typical of acute cellular rejection usually seen in unsensitized rejecting controls. Feeding allogeneic splenocytes prevents sensitization by skin grafts and transforms accelerated rejection of vascularized cardiac allografts to an acute form typical of unsensitized recipients. Oral administration of alloantigen provides a novel approach to down-regulate the specific systemic alloimmune response against histocompatibility antigens.     

Comparison of Abeta(b-/-), H2-DM(-), and CIITA(-/-) in second-set skin allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Responses against donor MHC antigens are the major contributor to allograft rejection. Currently, it is unclear whether both direct and indirect recognition pathways are necessary and/or sufficient for allograft rejection. Previously, we found donor MHC class II and H2-DM to have dramatic effects on cardiac allograft survival. METHODS: Here, we used H2-DM(-) mice, which express CLIP-MHC class II complexes, and CIITA(-/-) mice, which lack all class II proteins, to examine the role of direct and indirect recognition on skin allograft rejection. Recipients were primed with donor cultured keratinocytes and later tested for accelerated memory response by challenge with full-thickness tail skin grafts. RESULTS: As previously reported, Abeta(b-/-) grafts survived longer than wild-type grafts, while H2-DM(-) grafts were rejected as rapidly as wild-type grafts. Skin grafts deficient for both beta2m and H2-DM survived longer than grafts lacking only H2-DM, but not as long as Abeta(b-/-) grafts. Additionally, CIITA(-/-) grafts survived as long as Abeta(b-/-) grafts. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed rejection of Abeta(b-/-) compared to H2-DM(-) suggests that indirect recognition of surface-expressed donor MHC class II is sufficient to mediate rapid skin allograft rejection. The equivalent survival of CIITA(-/-) and Abeta(b-/-) grafts suggests that indirect presentation of donor class II molecules (Aalpha or Ebeta) present in Abeta(b-/-) but not CIITA(-/-) mice does not contribute to graft rejection. These results reveal a modest role for surface-expressed donor class II in primed keratinocyte rejection, but also reveal a dramatic contrast to the cardiac allograft system and indicate tissue/organ-specific mechanisms of rejection.     

The replacement of graft endothelium by recipient-type cells conditions allograft rejection mediated by indirect pathway CD4+ T cells

BACKGROUND: Whereas the participation of alloreactive T cells sensitized by indirect allorecognition in graft rejection is well documented, the nature of recipient antigen presenting cells recognized by indirect pathway CD4+ T cells within the graft has yet to be identified. The purpose of this study was to determine the role played by graft endothelium replacement in the immune recognition of cardiac allografts rejected by indirect pathway CD4+ T cells. METHODS: Transgenic RAG2-/- mice expressing I-Ab-restricted male antigen H-Y-specific TcR were studied for their capacity to reject H-2k male cardiac allografts. Chronic vascular rejection in this model was due to the indirect recognition of H-Y antigen shed from H-2k male allograft and presented by the recipient's own I-Ab APC to transgenic T cells. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis of rejected grafts revealed the presence of numerous microvascular endothelial cells (EC) that expressed recipient's I-Ab MHC class II molecules. This observation suggested that graft endothelium replacement by I-Ab-positive cells of recipient origin could stimulate the rejection of male H-2k graft by I-Ab-restricted H-Y-specific T cells. To investigate further this possibility, hearts from H-2b-into-H-2k irradiation bone marrow (BM) chimera were transplanted in transgenic recipients. A direct correlation was observed between the presence of I-Ab-positive EC within myocardial microvessels and the induction of acute rejection of chimeric H-2k male cardiac allografts transplanted in transgenic recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that graft endothelium replacement by recipient-type cells is required for the rejection of cardiac allograft mediated by indirect pathway alloreactive CD4+ T cells.     

The role of class I and class II MHC antigens in the rejection of vascularized heart allografts in mice

We have examined the role of entire major histocompatibility complex (MHC) disparity, individual class II or class I alloantigens in the rejection of vascularized heart allografts. Our results demonstrate that entire MHC, as well as both class II and class I disparities, may induce acute heart graft rejection or severe and irreversible heart muscle destruction. However, in 1 of 2 combinations differing at class II and 1 of 5 differing at class I, hearts have shown a good function greater than 100 days postgrafting. Furthermore, each donor-recipient combination has demonstrated a unique pattern of heart allograft function as well as a degree of heart muscle damage. In conclusion, these data suggest that the rejection process depends upon multiple factors such as the immune-response-gene-regulated immunoresponsiveness of the recipient as well as the expression of alloantigens on heart grafts during the induction and effector phases of the immune response.     

Allograft Rejection in a New Allospecific CD4+ TCR Transgenic Mouse

The application of TCR transgenic mice to transplantation immunology is hampered by the limited lines available. Recently, we reported CD4+ T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mice specific for I-Abm12 expressed on B6.C.H-2bm12 mice. Here, we characterized rejection of skin and vascularized cardiac allografts in these mice, which we term ABM (for anti-bm12). In vivo proliferative experiments reveal that all CD4 T cells in ABM mice react to bm12 antigens. Surprisingly, while ABM mice have accelerated (compared to B6 recipients) rejection of bm12 skin allografts, they, like B6 recipients, fail to acutely reject bm12 cardiac allografts. This is not due to lack of immunogenicity of bm12 hearts, as these grafts are acutely rejected by primed ABM recipients, although not by primed B6 recipients. Lastly, long-term surviving bm12 grafts in ABM recipients are relatively free from chronic rejection (compared with B6 recipients), which may be due to skewing of the CD4 repertoire towards direct alloreactivity, and consequent lack of CD4 mediated indirect allorecognition as evidenced by the lack of IgG deposition in those grafts. The results indicate that a complex interplay between responder frequency, priming and repertoire dictates the occurrence, or lack thereof, of acute and chronic rejection.     

Split tolerance to a composite tissue allograft in a swine model

BACKGROUND: The antigenicity of skin is a major obstacle to expanding human composite tissue transplantation. For example, multiple rejection episodes of the skin have been noted in clinical hand transplant patients. We have previously demonstrated tolerance to vascularized musculoskeletal allografts in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched miniature swine treated with 12 days of cyclosporine. This regimen did not reproducibly lead to tolerance to subsequent frozen donor skin grafts. However, such skin grafts did not have a primary vascular supply. The aim of this study was to determine if tolerance to limb allografts with a vascularized skin component could be achieved with MHC matching and a 12-day course of immunosuppression. METHODS: Hind limb grafts harvested with a 100 cm(2) cutaneous paddle were transplanted heterotopically into six MHC-matched, minor antigen-mismatched miniature swine. All animals received a 12-day course of cyclosporine. One control animal was not immunosuppressed. Grafts were evaluated with biweekly biopsies and tissue viability determined by histologic analysis. To test for sensitization, frozen donor skin grafts were applied to all animals that survived to postoperative day 100. RESULTS: All treated animals (n=6) were tolerant to their musculoskeletal allografts at the time of necropsy (>100 days) regardless of the status of the epidermis. One animal demonstrated tolerance to the skin for more than 180 days. The other five animals demonstrated prolonged survival of the epidermal portion of the graft. The control animal rejected the graft epidermis at 10 days postoperatively. Frozen donor skin grafts demonstrated accelerated rejection (<10 days) in three of the animals and led to simultaneous rejection of both the epidermis of the allograft and the skin graft in the long-term tolerant animal. The rejection of the skin grafts did not break tolerance to the musculoskeletal portion in any of the animals. CONCLUSIONS: All animals exhibited indefinite survival of the musculoskeletal portion of their allografts but only prolonged survival of the epidermis. The loss of the graft skin appears to be the result of an isolated immune reaction to the skin, and, in particular, the epidermis. This observation is further substantiated by the accelerated rejection of secondarily placed frozen donor skin grafts.