Salvage chemotherapy in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with docetaxel and gemcitabine: A multicenter phase II trial

Purpose: The activity of the docetaxel–gemcitabine combination in women with disease progression after initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was investigated in a multicenter phase II study.Patients and methods: Fifty-two patients with metastatic breast cancer who had disease relapse or progression after completion of an anthracycline-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 8. G-CSF 150 µcg/m2/d s.c. was given from day 9 to day 16 and the treatment was repeated every three weeks. The patients' median age was 57 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 26, 1 for 20 and 2 for 6 patients. The treatment was second-line for 27 (52%) and third-line for 25 (48%) patients. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.Results: Complete response occurred in seven (14%) patients and partial response in 21 (40%) for an overall response rate of 54% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 40%–67%). Fifteen (29%) patients had stable disease and nine (17%) progressive disease. Of 25 patients previously treated with taxanes, 11 (44%) responded (1 CR, 10 PR). Interestingly, in four patients with disease progression while receiving docetaxel or paclitaxel monotherapy, the docetaxel + gemcitabine combination achieved partial responses. Responses were observed at all metastatic sites (local disease 62%, lymph nodes 58%, skin 44%, lung 47% and liver 36%) with a median duration of response of 3.6 months (range 1–16) and a median time to disease progression of eight months (range 2–18.5). Grade 3 neutropenia developed in 10 (19%) and grade 4 in five (10%) patients. Neutropenia was associated with infection in four patients without toxic deaths. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia developed in nine (17%) patients and grade 4 in two (4%). Non-hematologic toxicity was usually mild.Conclusion: The docetaxel–gemcitabine combination is an active and well tolerated salvage treatment in patients with MBC. Previous treatment with taxanes does not preclude a good clinical response to this regimen.     

Monthly docetaxel and weekly gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer: A?phase II trial

Background:Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active againstbreast cancer. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate theefficacy and safety of monthly docetaxel combined with weeklygemcitabine in patients with chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic breastcancer. Patients and methods:Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, ofwhom thirty had received prior chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting,seven for metastatic disease, and two for both, including prioranthracycline in 33 patients. Treatment was gemcitabine 800mg/m² days 1, 8, 15 and docetaxel 100 mg/m² on day1, with cycles repeated every four weeks. Results:Response rate was 79% (95% confidenceinterval (CI): 63%–91%), with 2 complete and 29partial responses. Twenty-five of the responders remainedprogression-free for more than six months. Median survival was 24.5months. Delivered dose intensity of gemcitabine was lower than expected(63% of planned). The predominant hematologic toxicity was grade4 neutropenia in 36 patients, complicated by fever in three patients.With the exception of asthenia, severe non-hematological toxicities wereinfrequent. Conclusions:Monthly docetaxel, combined with weeklygemcitabine, has significant but manageable hematologic toxicity.Despite frequent dose adjustments, this doublet is very active inmetastatic breast cancer, producing a high proportion of durableresponses associated with favorable survival.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Aim:   Gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) have both shown activity in the treatment of anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the GD combination.
Methods:   Patients with measurable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had previously received anthracycline-based therapy were eligible. The patients received D 40 mg/m² followed by G 800 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles.
Results:   Thirty patients were enrolled and received a median of five cycles (range 0–8). Of these, 24 were evaluable for efficacy, with an overall response rate of 29.2% (95% CI, 12.6–51.1%). An additional 36.7% had a stable disease for an overall clinical benefit of 65.9%. The median duration of response was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0–3.6 months) and the median time to disease progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.0–8.9 months). The median survival time was 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.3–32.0 months). Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 73.3% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 6.7%.
Conclusion:   Weekly G and D is an active and safe regimen in treating metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was lower than that previously reported for this combination, which may relate to the lower doses used and the weekly D schedule. It may be worthwhile to further explore this combination to determine the optimal dosing schedule.     

Combined anti-microtubule therapy: a phase II study of weekly docetaxel plus estramustine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and estramustine exert anti-tumor effects by inhibiting microtubule function. In vitro data suggest synergism with this combination. This phase II study evaluated the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on day 2 and estramustine phosphate 280 mg p.o. tds days 1-3 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks, for a maximum of six treatment cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between August 1999 and March 2001; 36 were eligible. Of 31 evaluable patients, responses were observed in 15 patients (47%); two patients (6%) obtained a complete response. Median time to treatment failure was 6 months; median survival was 1 year. Thromboembolic toxicity occurred in 11% of patients: three experienced deep venous thromboses and one had a fatal pulmonary embolism. Myelosuppression was minimal with this regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest activity in metastatic breast cancer, the toxicity observed with the combination of estramustine and docetaxel precludes the routine use of this combination in the treatment of breast cancer. Further studies using this compound in metastatic breast cancer are not warranted.     

Phase II multicentre study of docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines. A total of 41 patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer and performance status 0-2, who had received at least one anthracycline-containing regimen, received docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) followed by continuous infusion of 5-FU 750 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 5 days every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. All patients received corticosteroid premedication, but there was no prophylactic colony-stimulating factor support. The most frequent metastatic sites were the liver (61%), bone (29%), and lung (29%). All 41 patients were assessable for toxicity and 30 were eligible and assessable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 70.0% (95% CI: 53.6-86.4%) for the per protocol group and 53.7% (95% CI: 38.4-68.9%) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. For the ITT population, median duration of response was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-12.2 months), median time to progression was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.5-8.6 months), and median survival was 17 months (95% CI: 12.3-not recorded months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 54% of patients, with febrile neutropenia in 24% of patients and 5% of cycles, but infections were rare. Stomatitis was frequent, grade 3 in 24% of patients and grade 4 in one patient (2%), but manageable. Diarrhoea was rare, grade 3 in 7% of patients and 1% of cycles. Other grade 3/4 nonhaematological toxicities were infrequent. In conclusion, this docetaxel/5-FU regimen is highly active and well tolerated in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. The efficacy is particularly promising, as one-third of patients were either second-line and/or anthracycline-resistant/refractory.     

多西他赛联合卡铂治疗复发转移乳腺癌的效果和安全性

目的观察多西他赛联合卡铂（DC）治疗复发或转移性乳腺癌的效果和安全性。方法68例复发或转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分为DC组（33例）和对照组（35例）。DC组采用多西他赛联合卡铂治疗,对照组采用长春瑞滨（NVB）联合顺铂（DDP）组成NP方案治疗,评价两组的近远期疗效,观察不良反应。结果DC组有效率为46．9％,疾病控制率71．9％;对照组有效率为41．9％,疾病控制率68．8％。两组近期疗效差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。DC组患者生存率为28．1％,死亡率为71．9％;对照组生存率为22．6％,死亡率为77．4％,两组远期疗效比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。两组均出现严重的白细胞减少和脱发现象,发生率〉90％,但DC组Ⅲ-Ⅳ级毒副作用发生率显著低于对照组（P〈0．05）;DC组出现关节肌肉痛、恶心呕吐和静脉炎的发生率和Ⅲ～Ⅳ级毒副作用发生率均显著低于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论多西他赛联合卡铂治疗复发或转移性乳腺癌疗效确切,不良反应可以耐受,值得临床进一步开展研究和推广。     

多西他赛对复发转移性乳腺癌免疫功能的影响

目的：探讨多西他赛化疗前、化疗2周期评价疗效时复发转移性乳腺癌（MBC）患者外周血淋巴细胞亚群比率的变化及影响因素。方法应用流式细胞仪检测34例行多西他赛一线化疗的复发MBC患者化疗前、化疗2周期评价疗效时外周血淋巴细胞亚群[CD3+T淋巴细胞、CD3+/CD4+T淋巴细胞、CD3+/CD8+T淋巴细胞、CD3－/CD16+56+自然杀伤细胞（NK）、CD3+/CD16+56+T淋巴细胞、CD19+B淋巴细胞、CD4+/CD25+调节性T细胞（Treg细胞）、CD8+/CD28－T淋巴细胞和CD8+/CD28+T淋巴细胞]比率,并进一步分析患者临床病理因素对于外周血淋巴细胞亚群变化的影响。结果34例患者化疗后CD3+总T淋巴细胞、CD3+/CD4+T淋巴细胞及CD19+B淋巴细胞比率均较化疗前下降（P=0.002、0.044、0.006）,下降平均比率分别为2.2%、4.7%、3.1%。中位年龄﹥54岁的患者CD19+B淋巴细胞下降比率较中位年龄≤54岁的患者小（P=0.031）;中位OS﹥3.6个月的患者CD3+总T淋巴细胞下降比率较中位OS≤33.6个月的患者小（P=0.038）。结论多西他赛化疗后MBC患者外周血总T、B淋巴细胞比率下降,免疫功能降低,而相对保留较好的T淋巴细胞免疫功能的患者可能有更好的生存获益。     

Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine in refractory advanced breast cancer patients: A parallel dose-finding study

Purpose:The objective of this study was to determine thedocetaxel MTD when combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in advanced breastcancer patients who had received previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy foradvanced disease. Patients and methods:Advanced breast cancer patients aged between18 and 70 with ECOG PS 0–2 who had not responded to, or had relapsedafter, first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were randomized to receiveeither gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² or vinorelbine 25 mg/m²in combination with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting from 30mg/m²), all on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. Escalation wasstopped if >33% of patients treated at a given dose level showed DLTat the first cycle. Results:A total of 34 patients with locally advanced (8) ormetastatic disease (26) were treated, for a total of 94 cycles delivered.Nineteen patients received docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine and 15with vinorelbine. All patients had been pretreated with anthracyclines, and24 of 34 had also received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel. A docetaxel dose of40/m² proved to be safe when combined on days 1 and 8 withgemcitabine, while a dose of 35 mg/m² was tolerated in combinationwith vinorelbine. Overall, nine episodes of DLT, all of them neutropenia,occurred at the first cycle. Considering all 94 cyles, grades 3 or 4neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 15 (44%), and 7(20%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for threecases of grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. All patients were assessed forresponse on an 'intent-to-treat' basis. Overall, five partial responses wererecorded (docetaxel + gemcitabine = 3 and docetaxel + vinorelbine = 2), fora 15% (95% CI: 5%–31%) overall responserate. Only 1 of 24 (4%) patients who had received weekly dose-densepaclitaxel responded to treatment. Conclusions:The weekly docetaxel administration in combinationwith either gemcitabine or vinorelbine is a well-tolerated treatment forheavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. This approach, althoughsometimes capable of achieving a major response, does not seem advisable inadvanced breast cancer patients refractory to both anthracyclines andpaclitaxel.     

Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine antimetabolite which has shown activity in metastatic breast cancer both as a single agent, but also in various combination regimens. It is characterized by a unique mechanism of action which includes cytotoxic self-potentiation, masked DNA chain termination and potent inhibition of DNA repair. The clinical application of gemcitabine is supported by a favorable toxicity profile. In metastatic breast cancer, several Phase II trials document the activity of gemcitabine in pretreated and unpretreated patients. In a single Phase III trial performed in elderly patients not pretreated, gemcitabine was inferior to epirubicin. High activity has, however, been obtained by the combination of gemcitabine with taxanes such as paclitaxel or docetaxel. In a randomized trial performed in anthracycline-pretreated patients, the combined use of gemcitabine and paclitaxel induced a significant improvement not only of response rate and time to disease progression, but also caused a significant increase in quality of life and survival when compared with paclitaxel alone. The combination of gemcitabine with vinorelbine and cisplatin has been validated in numerous Phase II trials and promises reliable activity in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated patients. Triple-agent regimens such as gemcitabine/epirubicin/paclitaxel provided consistently high response rates in Phase II trials, but failed to show superiority over the 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide regimen in a randomized Phase III trial. Based on high response rates and pathological complete remission rates achieved by preoperative induction therapy with gemcitabine/epirubicin/taxane regimens, ongoing trials focus on the incorporation of gemcitabine into neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens.     

多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的临床观察

目的：观察多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效及不良反应。方法：选择我科2005年6月-2008年6月收治的31例转移性乳腺癌患者,给予多西他赛联合顺铂（TP方案）化疗,21d为1个周期,2周期后评价疗效。有效者给予6周期的化疗。结果：31例患者有效率51．6％,其中012例,PR14例。中位疾病进展时间8．6个月,中位生存时间19．2个月。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及消化道反应和脱发。其中Ⅲ度以上白细胞减少的发生率26．0％。结论：多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效确切,不良反应可以耐受。     

多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的临床观察

目的:观察多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效及不良反应.方法:选择我科2005年6月-2008年6月收治的31例转移性乳腺癌患者,给予多西他赛联合顺铂(TP方案)化疗,21d为1个周期,2周期后评价疗效.有效者给予6周期的化疗.结果:31例患者有效率51.6%,其中CR2例,PR14例.中位疾病进展时间8.6个月,中位生存时间19.2个月.主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及消化道反应和脱发.其中Ⅲ度以上白细胞减少的发生率26.0%.结论:多西他赛联合顺铂治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效确切,不良反应可以耐受.     

A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (intravenous; days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; day 8) every 21 days. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received a median of five cycles (range one to 22) of treatment and were followed until death or for a median of 28 months (range 19.4-36.6) among living patients. Fourteen partial responses for an overall response rate of 24% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 39%] were documented. Nine (15%; CI 5% to 32%) patients had stable disease for >6 months. The median survival time was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.3-18.9) and the 1 year survival rate was 49% (95% CI 38% to 64%). The median time to progression was estimated to be 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.3). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 83% and 27% of patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Other common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (17%), dyspnea (15%), rash (7%) and anorexia (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is clinically active, with an overall response rate of 24% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Myelosuppression (66% grade 4 neutropenia and 14% febrile neutropenia) was the major treatment-related toxicity observed for this combination.     

Pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Overexpression of HER2 – found in approximately 15–20% of all breast cancers – is a negative prognostic factor. Although trastuzumab significantly improves the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer, half of the patients with metastatic breast cancer experience disease progression within 1 year. Pertuzumab is a novel HER2-targeted humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the dimerization domain of HER2 and acts synergically with trastuzumab in inhibiting tumor progression. The CLEOPATRA trial demonstrated that adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab plus docetaxel significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival without increasing severe adverse events. Conclusively, pertuzumab was approved by the US FDA in June 2012 for use in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, various clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab combined with other cytotoxic agents are ongoing at present. Thus, pertuzumab has been becoming important for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

A phase 1 study of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin with everolimus may improve the efficacy of taxanes. Everolimus and docetaxel are both metabolized by CYP3A4, which could result in a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction.

METHODS:

Fifteen patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel (doses of 40‐75 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of a 21‐day cycle) in combination with everolimus (doses ranging from 20 to 50 mg orally on days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle) in a phase 1 trial using the continuous reassessment method to determine maximum tolerated dose. The first 2 patients developed a dose‐limiting toxicity (neutropenic infection), prompting a mandatory dose reduction and PK evaluation of both everolimus and docetaxel for patients enrolled in subsequent dosing cohorts.

RESULTS:

Fifteen patients were treated. Dose‐limiting toxicity included grade 3 mucositis (n = 1), prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1), and grade 3 infection/febrile neutropenia (n = 3). Day 8 of everolimus was commonly held for neutropenia despite a dose reduction in docetaxel to 40 mg/m². Eleven patients underwent complete PK evaluation for everolimus, and 9 patients underwent complete PK evaluation for both everolimus and docetaxel. Widely variable changes in clearance were seen for both drugs, and the study was terminated because of lack of efficacy and concerns regarding toxicity seen with the combination.

CONCLUSIONS:

Weekly everolimus in combination with docetaxel every 3 weeks was associated with excessive neutropenia and variable clearance of both drugs, making combination therapy unpredictable, even at low doses of both drugs. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven women were treated with 1 h infusions of docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week after pre-medication with 8 mg dexamethazone. Each cycle consisted of three consecutive weekly treatments followed by a 1 week rest. All patients were assessed for toxicity; five patients were not assessable for clinical response, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) because of early treatment failure, but they were included in intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1-9), with a median dose intensity of 28 mg/m2/week (range 22-30) and a median relative dose intensity of 0.95 (range 0.73-1.0). No patients showed complete response, whereas 14 had partial response, which accounted for 38% of objective response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 53%]. In addition, three patients (8%, 95% CI 0% to 17%) had stable disease over 6 months. Clinical responses were achieved at a median of three cycles (range 1-4 cycles). The median TTP and OS were 5 and 12 months, respectively. The weekly docetaxel regimen was generally well tolerated. About half of the patients experienced grade > or = 1 neutropenia; only 19% had grade 3/4 neutropenia, including one case of grade 4. No febrile neutropenia was observed and fluid retention syndrome was uncommon. Non-hematologic toxicity, however, such as asthenia/fatigue, nail damage, tearing or hearing disorders, was seen with successive treatment cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week is an active and feasible regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Background:

An increasing proportion of patients are exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Re-exposure in the metastatic stage is limited by drug resistance, thus evaluation of non-cross-resistant regimens is mandatory.

Methods:

Anthracycline-pretreated patients were randomly assigned to three gemcitabine-based regimens. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1.000 mg m⁻² plus vinorelbin 25 mg m⁻² on days 1+8 (GemVin), or plus cisplatin 30 mg m⁻² on days 1+8 (GemCis), or plus capecitabine 650 mg m⁻² b.i.d. orally days 1–14 (GemCap), q3w. The primary end point was response rate.

Results:

A total of 141 patients were recruited on the trial. The overall response rates were 39.0% (GemVin), 47.7% (GemCis) and 34.7% (GemCap). Median progression-free survival was estimated with 5.7, 6.9 and 8.3 months, respectively. Corresponding median survival times were 17.5 (GemVin), 13.0 (GemCis) and 19.4 months (GemCap). Neutropenia ⩾grade 3 occurred in 16.7% (Gem/Vin), 4.4% (GemCis) and 0% (Gem/Cap), whereas non-haematological toxicities were rarely severe except grade 3 hand–foot syndrome in 2.0% of the GemCap patients (per patient analysis).

Conclusions:

This randomised phase II trial has revealed comparable results for three gemcitabine-based regimens regarding treatment efficacy and toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to be a worthwhile treatment option for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Metastatic breast cancer in pregnancy: first case of chemotherapy with docetaxel

The focus of this paper is a case study of a woman in the first trimester of pregnancy who presented with metastatic breast cancer. The bony spread of the metastases was rapid and it was necessary to treat the patient as soon as possible after the period of organogenesis (days 18–60 of human gestation). This stage is the phase of greatest sensitivity of teratogens and the malformations are observed most often. Yet, the choice of third-line chemotherapy was difficult because of anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. The world literature reported cytotoxic combinated regimens as the standard of care for the management of the metastases. The development of new antitumoral strategies with less toxicity and their encouraging results led us to the approval of docetaxel for the treatment of the patient even though it had never been tested in pregnancy. Docetaxel is a potent inhibitor of microtubule depolymerization and has a unique ability to alter certain classes of microtubules. The monochemotherapy was administered once every 3 weeks for a total of three cycles until 30 weeks of gestation. During the 32nd week of pregnancy the patient delivered a female infant whose birthweight and Apgar score were normal. The infant did not have any anomalies. The woman finished her treatment in puerperium and she received three cycles of docetaxel. The patient has been receiving vinorelbine (one cycle every 2 weeks) for 2 years; her last follow-up was good and showed that the progression of the metastases had stopped. The daughter's psychophysical development was normal.     

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer

Background. Gemcitabine (G) and vinorelbine (V) have favorable safety profile and antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer. To exploit their different mechanism of action and lack of overlapping toxicity, we performed a phase I and II study of G and V in combination. Patients and methods. Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated. In the dose-finding phase, seven cohorts of patients (22 women) received increasing doses to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Patients recruited in the phase II portion of the study (31 women) received the dose level immediately below the one defined as MTD (i.e., G 1200mg/m², V 30mg/m², on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks). Results. Dose escalation was discontinued at G 1400mg/m² and V 30mg/m² because of toxic death due to thrombocytopenia and CNS hemorrage. No other limiting toxicities were observed, and tolerability was similar at all dose levels studied in the escalation portion of the study. The main toxicity was granulocytopenia of grade 3/4 in 36 and 48% of the patients on phase I and II respectively, without episodes of neutropenic fever. Thrombocytopenia was uncommon. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. In 46 evaluable patients, the response rate was 24% (complete response 7%, partial response 17%). Disease stabilization was observed in further 17%. The median duration of response was 12 months (range 5–14) and the median survival was 20 months (range 1 to 45+). Conclusions. G and V, on day 1 and 8 of 3-weekly cycles, can safely be administered to patients with metastatic breast cancer at the dose of 1200 and 30mg/m², respectively. The antitumor activity of G and V in combination was similar to that reported when using either drug as single agent.     

Sequential or alternating administration of docetaxel (Taxotere) combined with FEC in metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase II trial

The aim of this study, using a Fleming single-stage design, was to explore the efficacy and safety of Taxotere 100 x mg x m(-2) docetaxel and FEC 75 cyclophosphamide 500 mg x m(-2), fluorouracil 500 x mg x m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg x m(-2), in alternating and sequential schedules for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. One hundred and thirty-six women were randomly allocated, to one of three treatment regimens: DTX 100 plus FEC 75, alternated for eight courses (ALT); four courses of DTX 100 followed by four courses of FEC 75 (SEQ T); or four courses of FEC 75 followed by four courses of DTX 100 (SEQ F). One hundred and thirty-one women were evaluable for tumour response. Although the treatment outcome was equivalent in the two sequential arms and the alternating regimen (P=0.110, not significant), the response rate was less encouraging in the SEQ F arm (52.3%) than in the other two arms (71.1% for ALT and 70.5% for SEQ T), in which docetaxel was administered first. Time to progression was similar in the ALT, SEQ T and SEQ F arms (9.5, 9.3 and 10.4 months respectively). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in nearly all patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% (ALT), 16% (SEQ T) and 2% (SEQ F) of patients. Few patients (< or =9%) developed grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities. Relative dose intensity was 97-99% for all regimens. All treatment regimens were active and well tolerated.     

The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is an active regimen as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines: a phase I-II study

Purpose. To evaluate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GemVin), in patients with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anthracyclines alone or with taxanes. Patients and methods. Nine patients were entered into the phase I and 50 patients were entered into the phase II study. Gemcitabine was administered beginning with the dose of 800 mg/m² and vinorelbine was given at the fixed dose of 25 mg/m², both on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. Escalated dose levels of gemcitabine were planned by increments of 200 mg/m² per level. The median age of the 50 assessable patients for the phase II study was 56.5 years (range 30–70) and median performance status (PS, ECOG score), 1 (range 0–2). The dominant sites of metastases were viscera in 40, bone in five and soft tissue in five patients. First-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease with taxanes and anthracyclines or with anthracyclines alone was administered in 36 and 14 patients, respectively. Results. The optimal schedule for the combination was gemcitabine 800 mg/m² and vinorelbine 25 mg/m². The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m², with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in two cases at this dose level. Overall, 267 cycles were given to the 50 patients enrolled into the phase II (mean 5.3; range 3–9). The schedule was well tolerated: three patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and another four patients experienced grade 3 anemia. Non-hematological toxicities were moderate. A major objective response was observed in 42% of patients (95% confidence interval (CI), 28–57%), with complete remission in four (8%) and partial response in 17 (34%) patients. The median time to progression was 6 months. Activity as well as toxicity were similar in the subgroups of the patients pretreated either with combinations of taxanes and anthracyclines or anthracyclines alone. Conclusions. The optimal GemVin schedule is an effective and well tolerated second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer pre-treated with anthracycline – based schedules or with combinations of anthracyclines and taxanes.