Comparison of two lansoprazole–antibiotic combinations (amoxycillin or classical triple therapy) for treatment of H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients

Aim: To compare the eradicating capacity of two different antibiotic–lansoprazole combinations (amoxycillin vs. standard triple therapy) with that of lansoprazole alone in Helicobacter pylori- positive duodenal ulcer patients.
Methods: Ninety-six out-patients with H. pylori- positive duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to receive one of the following three antiulcer regimens: (1) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. for 4 weeks plus amoxycillin 1 g t.d.s. during the last 2 weeks; or (2) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 4 weeks plus classical triple therapy (tripotassium dicitratobismuthate 240 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g t.d.s. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d.) for the last 2 weeks; or (3) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Endoscopy was repeated at the end of treatment and 1 month later. A rapid urease test and histology were used to determine H. pylori status.
Results: Duodenal ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks were 96% after both lansoprazole with amoxycillin, and lansoprazole with triple therapy, and 97% after lansoprazole alone. Eradication of H. pylori was significantly better with lansoprazole with triple therapy than with either lansoprazole with amoxycillin or lansoprazole alone (90% vs. 55% vs. 3%, respectively).
Conclusion: Classical triple therapy combined with lansoprazole is significantly more effective than the lansoprazole with amoxycillin combination for the eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer patients pre-treated with lansoprazole.     

Dose-response of omeprazole combined with amoxycillin on duodenal ulcer healing and eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy using omeprazole and amoxycillin can cure Helicobacter pylori infection, but data are controversial concerning the efficacy of this regimen. The present study investigated varying doses of omeprazole combined with a standard amoxycillin dose on duodenal ulcer healing and eradication of H. pylori, in order to find an optimal dose regimen. METHODS: H. pylori-positive out-patients (n = 231) with duodenal ulcers were treated randomly and double-blind with either omeprazole 20, 40 or 80 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 14 days. Patients with an unhealed ulcer after this therapy took omeprazole 20 mg o.m. for another month. RESULTS: After 2 weeks, ulcer healing rates in the three treatment groups were not statistically different (85, 82 and 93%, respectively). Treatment with omeprazole 80 mg b.d. was significantly better in curing H. pylori infection (eradication rate 69%) than treatment with omeprazole 20 and 40 mg b.d. (47 and 53%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of either omeprazole 20 or 40 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., is not sufficiently effective to be recommended as an anti-H. pylori therapy. Omeprazole 80 mg b.d. combined with amoxycillin is more efficient and well tolerated, but better treatment options now exist to cure H. pylori infection.     

High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin for the treatment or retreatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background : The combination of 120 mg of omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) and amoxycillin has been reported to be effective for treating H. pylori infections.
Methods : Normal volunteers with H. pylori infection received high-dose omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) or lansoprazole (60 mg t.d.s.) plus amoxycillin 750 mg t.d.s. for 14 days. The studies were open label and not randomized as those receiving omeprazole plus amoxycillin had previously failed lower dose omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus amoxycillin therapy more than 6 months previously. Those receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin had not been previously treated. Four to 6 weeks after ending antimicrobial therapy, H. pylori status was determined by Genta stain of gastric mucosal biopsies.
Results : Forty-three volunteers entered the study and 41 completed it. The overall success with high-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin was 34.9%. For the individual regimens the per-protocol results were 48% (95% CI=28–69%) with lansoprazole and 12.5% (95% CI=2–38%) with omeprazole. Compliance was >95% for both regimens. Side-effects were experienced by four lansoprazole and three omeprazole subjects, and caused two omeprazole subjects to withdraw. Cure rates were similar among different races and ethnic groups, between men and women, and between smokers and non-smokers. The level of the pre-treatment urea breath test also did not predict outcome.
Conclusion : High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin combinations for treatment of H. pylori infection yielded unacceptable results, as the 95% confidence intervals did not include an 80% cure rate. These combinations do not yield consistent results worldwide and cannot be recommended as primary therapy.     

Efficacy and tolerability of a one-week triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer

Background : Previous studies have shown that one-week triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin may cure Helicobacter pylori infection in the vast majority of patients. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that a triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin cures the infection in 80% of duodenal ulcer patients infected with H. pylori .
Methods : In an open two-centre study, 60 duodenal ulcer patients were treated with pantoprazole 40 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 1 week. During the second week patients received pantoprazole 40 mg once in the morning. We assessed H. pylori infection before treatment and 4 weeks after cessation of the study medication by a rapid urease test, histology after Warthin–Starry stain and a ¹³C-urea breath test.
Results : Sixty patients (42 males, mean age 47.4 years) entered the trial. All patients were infected with H. pylori . One patient was withdrawn from the study because of allergy to penicillin and six patients were protocol violators. H. pylori infection was cured in 47 out of 53 patients who completed the trial according to the protocol (89%; 95% CI: 80–97%) and in 49 of 60 patients included in the trial (82%; 95% CI: 72–92%). Four weeks after the last administration of study drugs, 55 out of 60 ulcers had healed (92%). Twenty-nine patients reported 51 adverse events that were mostly mild to moderate.
Conclusions : One-week triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin is a simple and effective approach to the cure of H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer. In those patients who took the drugs as prescribed the H. pylori cure rate was 89%, with the lower 95% confidence limit being 80%.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is effective for healing duodenal ulcers, eradicating H. pylori and reducing ulcer recurrence. RBC H. pylori Study Group [see comments]

AIM: To compare the efficacy of the coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus the antibiotic clarithromycin, with ranitidine bismuth citrate alone or clarithromycin alone for the healing of duodenal ulcers, eradication of H. pylori and the reduction of ulcer recurrence. METHODS: This two-phase, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, multicentre study consisted of a 4-week treatment phase followed by a 24-week post-treatment observation phase. Patients with an active duodenal ulcer were treated with either ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks; ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 4 weeks plus placebo t.d.s. for first 2 weeks; placebo b.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks; or placebo b.d. for 4 weeks plus placebo t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were highest with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin (82%) followed by ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (74%; P = 0.373), clarithromycin alone (73%; P = 0.33) and placebo (52%; P = 0.007). Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin provided significantly better ulcer symptom relief compared with clarithromycin alone or placebo (P < 0.05). The coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin resulted in significantly higher H. pylori eradication rates 4 weeks post-treatment (82%) than did treatment with either ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (0%; P < 0.001), clarithromycin alone (36%; P = 0.008) or placebo (0%; P < 0.001). Ulcer recurrence rates 24 weeks post-treatment were lower following treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin (21%) compared with ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (86%; P < 0.001), clarithromycin alone (40%; P = 0.062) or placebo (88%; P = 0.006). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is a simple, well-tolerated and effective treatment for active H. pylori- associated duodenal ulcer disease. This treatment regimen effectively heals duodenal ulcers, provides effective symptom relief, eradicates H. pylori infection and reduces the rate of ulcer recurrence. The eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ulcer recurrence.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin twice daily in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background : Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg when given twice daily (b.d.) for 4 weeks with clarithromycin 250 mg four times daily (q.d.s.) for the first 2 weeks effectively heals duodenal ulcers and eradicates Helicobacter pylori .
Aims : To compare two dosage regimens of clarithromycin, 250 mg q.d.s. and 500 mg b.d., used with ranitidine bismuth citrate (Pylorid) 400 mg b.d., for the eradication of H. pylori and for symptom relief in patients with active duodenal ulcers.
Subjects : 236 patients with active duodenal ulcer and confirmed H. pylori infection.
Methods : In a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-centre study, RBC was given with clarithromycin for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks treatment with RBC alone to allow for ulcer healing. Ulcer status was assessed by endoscopy at entry. H. pylori status was assessed by CLO Test and ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT) at entry and UBT alone 4 weeks after the end of treatment. At entry, during the study and at follow-up, ulcer symptoms were recorded on a scale of none, mild, moderate or severe.
Results : 176 patients had an evaluable UBT at least 4 weeks post-treatment. H. pylori eradication rates were 96.2% for the RBC plus clarithromycin b.d. regimen and 91.8% for the RBC plus clarithromycin q.d.s. regimen (observed data). Four weeks post-treatment, 92% of patients receiving RBC b.d. plus clarithromycin q.d.s. and 89% receiving RBC b.d. plus clarithromycin b.d. were considered symptom successes (none or mild symptoms).
Conclusions : RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. was as effective as RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg q.d.s. in eradicating H. pylori and both regimens were well tolerated. The simpler dual therapy in a b.d. regimen might well encourage greater patient compliance.     

High effectiveness and safety of one-week antibiotic regimen in Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background: Helicobacter pylori is strongly associated with peptic ulcer: H. pylori eradication markedly decreases the recurrence rate of duodenal and gastric ulcer, but the optimum length of antibiotic therapy in the eradication of H. pylori is still unclear.
Aim: To verify the effectiveness and side-effect profile of an eradicating regimen consisting of omeprazole 20 mg daily for 4 weeks and, during the first week, combination antimicrobial treatment with tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. in patients with active duodenal and gastric ulcer.
Methods: One hundred and ninety-six duodenal ulcer patients and 27 gastric ulcer patients with H. pylori infection were admitted into an open prospective study. Compliance was assessed by an accurate interview.
Results: Overall, H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 201 of 223 patients (intention-to-treat 90.1%; 95% CI=85–94%): 176 of 196 duodenal ulcer patients became H. pylori- negative (89.8%; CI=85–94%) as well as 25 of 27 gastric ulcer patients (92.6%; CI=76–99%). Compliance was excellent in 221 of 223 (99.1%) patients evaluated as having taken all the medication as prescribed. Sixteen patients (7.2%) developed mild side effects during treatment.
Conclusion: This combination treatment had excellent results with almost absolute compliance and a very low rate of minor side effects.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with low or high dose omeprazole combined with amoxycillin and the effect of early retreatment

Background : Cure rates of H. pylori infection, using dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxycillin, vary considerably and the efficacy of retreatment with this regimen in the case of initial failure is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a large prospective double-blind randomized trial, studying the efficacy of low vs. high dose omeprazole in dual therapy and of early retreatment with the same regimens.
Methods : One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive H. pylori -positive patients, suffering from either peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia, were enrolled. Group I ( n =84) received omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 750 mg t.d.s., for 2 weeks. Group II ( n =84) received omeprazole 40 mg t.d.s. plus amoxicillin 750 mg t.d.s., for 2 weeks.
Results : The H. pylori eradication rate was 60.2% in group I and 64.3% in group II ( P =0.59). Cure of H. pylori infection was significantly better in patients with peptic ulcer disease, compared to non-ulcer dyspeptics ( P =0.016). Retreatment, given in 54 patients, was successful in 21.4% patients in group I and in 28% patients in group II ( P =0.58).
Conclusions : High dose of omeprazole has no advantage compared to low dose in terms of eradication efficacy. Early retreatment with the same regimen offers limited improvement in cure rate. Presence of peptic ulcer disease influences cure rates significantly.     

clinical aspects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in peptic ulcer disease

Background and aims : Although the role of H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease is no longer in dispute, certain aspects of eradication therapy in this condition have yet to be settled. Uncertainties still surround the relationship between Helicobacter pylori status and ulcer healing, the efficacy of eradication therapy in alleviating acute symptoms and healing ulcers, and the prognosis after eradication with respect to recurrence of symptoms, ulcers and complications. The present literature review, encompassing studies published up to October 1995, specifically addresses these issues.
Results : Pooled data show that eradication therapy heals 90% of duodenal ulcers and 85% of gastric ulcers, while individual studies repeatedly confirm that it is more effective at healing ulcers than conventional treatment with anti-secretory drugs. Recent reports indicate that triple therapy regimens for 1 week, provided they include an anti-secretory drug, are sufficient to achieve high rates of healing and rapid symptom relief. A detailed analysis of the data, particularly those from studies reporting healing rates in relation to H. pylori status after eradication therapy, provides strong evidence that eradication of H. pylori produces ulcer healing. Follow-up studies show that ulcer recurrence and complications are rare after eradication treatment in patients with either gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. However, while ulcer symptoms are infrequent during follow-up, a proportion of patients appear to develop gastrooesophageal reflux after eradication.
Conclusions : H. pylori eradication is highly effective in promoting ulcer healing and preventing subsequent ulcer recurrence. These beneficial effects of eradication therapy are observed in patients with either gastric or duodenal ulcers which are associated with H. pylori infection.     

Pantoprazole, amoxycillin and either azithromycin or clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that 1-week triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxycillin and clarithromycin may cure Helicobacter pylori infection in the majority of patients. AIM: To establish whether pantoprazole plus amoxycillin in association with either azithromycin or clarithromycin is useful in curing H. pylori infection in patients with a duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with active duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were treated with pantoprazole (days 1-7, 40 mg b.d.; days 8-28 40 mg o.d.) plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for the first 7 days. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either azithromycin 500 mg o.d. for the first 6 days (PAAz group; n=55) or clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for the first 7 days of treatment (PAC group; n=55). H. pylori status was determined by urease test and histology before the treatment, and again 4 weeks after cessation of any medication. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients completed the study. H. pylori infection was eradicated in 78% (39/50) of patients in the PAAz group (ITT analysis: 71%, 95% CI: 61-83%) vs. 81% (43/53) of patients in the PAC group (ITT analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 69-90%) (N.S.). All ulcers had healed. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that 1-week triple therapy with pantoprazole, amoxycillin and either azithromycin or clarithromycin is not satisfactory (<80% ITT H. pylori eradication rate).     

Triple therapy with sucralfate, amoxycillin and metronidazole for healing duodenal ulcer and eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection

Methods: Seventy-seven chronic duodenal ulcer patients (50 male) were entered into this study. Treatment was started with sucralfate suspension (2 g b.d.) for 8 weeks. After 2 weeks the patients also received 750 mg amoxycillin t.d.s. plus 500 mg metronidazole t.d.s. for 12 days. Endoscopy with six antral biopsies (urease test, Gram staining, culture and histology) was performed before commencement of sucralfate therapy, 4 weeks after the end of antibiotic therapy, and during the follow-up examinations at 6 and 12 months.
Results: Seven patients were excluded prematurely from the study. Helicobacter pylori in five patients had primary resistance to metronidazole and these patients were also excluded. The ulcer healing rate 4 weeks after the end of antibiotic therapy was 92% and the H. pylori eradication rate was 82% (all per protocol). In all patients who were still H. pylori- positive, the bacterium became resistant to metronidazole and histologically the inflammatory state of the mucosa was the same as before treatment. All H. pylori- eradicated patients (n=53) were re-examined after 6 and 12 months; no ulcer recurrence was observed and each time only one reinfection was found.
Conclusions: In an open study, sucralfate with amoxycillin and metronidazole appeared to act together to eradicate H. pylori infection and to speed duodenal ulcer healing.     

One-week low-dose triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori is sufficient for relief from symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers

Aim : To test the hypothesis that 1-week low-dose triple therapy for H. pylori is sufficient for relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers.
Methods : Fifty-nine out-patients with duodenal ulcers and positive rapid urease test participated in this randomized, double-blind, two-centre study. All patients were treated for 1 week with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. In a double-blind fashion, patients were then randomly treated for another 3 weeks with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or an identical-looking placebo. Patients were investigated endoscopically before treatment for H. pylori , after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. H. pylori infection was assessed by a ¹³C-urea breath test at the time of enrolment and 4 weeks after cessation of any study medication.
Results : Fifty-two patients were included in the 'all patients treated' analysis of efficacy. The overall H. pylori cure rate was 96% (95% CI=87–100%), with no difference between the treatment groups. After 2 weeks duodenal ulcer healing was confirmed in 91% (95% CI=80–100%) of patients treated with omeprazole and in 76% (95% CI=60–91%) in the placebo group ( P =0.14). After 4 weeks all ulcers had healed. Relief from dyspeptic symptoms and adverse events (13.8 and 16.7%) did not differ between the treatment groups.
Conclusions : One-week low-dose triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is a highly effective and well-tolerated approach to the cure of H. pylori infection in patients with a duodenal ulcer. Our data suggest that continuation of antisecretory drug therapy beyond anti- H. pylori therapy is actually excessive regarding relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers.     

One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background : Multi-drug regimens are generally required to reliably cure H. pylori infection. We previously demonstrated that a 2-week three-times-a-day regimen of amoxycillin and clarithromycin was effective against H. pylori infection.
Objectives : To evaluate the efficacy and side-effects of a 1-week twice-daily dosing schedule for the treatment of H. pylori infection.
Methods : We studied the efficacy of 1-week of therapy with 20 mg of omeprazole, 1 g of amoxycillin and 250 mg of clarithromycin, all twice daily H. pylori status was determined at entry and 4 or more weeks after completing antimicrobial therapy using histology (Genta stain) and culture.
Results : Thirty-one patients with documented peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection were treated. The H. pylori infection was cured in 24 (77%, 95% CI= 58–90%) (intention-to-treat). In a per protocol analysis the cure rate was 23 of 29 patients (79%, 95% CI= 60–92%). One patient took only 43% of the study drugs and another withdrew following development of an anaphylactic reaction to study medication. Mild side-effects were reported by 16% including diarrhoea, headache and altered taste. Compliance averaged 95%. Pretreatment clarithromycin resistance averaged 5% and had not been acquired by any strains post-therapy.
Conclusion : This combination of omeprazole, amoxycillin and low-dose clarithromycin resulted in a relatively low cure rate even in patients with clarithromycin-sensitive isolates. Large comparative studies will be needed to define the optimal duration, dose and dosing interval if this combination of drugs is to become competitive.     

Randomized study comparing omeprazole plus amoxycillin versus omeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background : Dual therapy with omeprazole plus amoxycillin or with omeprazole plus clarithromycin has been proposed for eradication of Helicobacter pylori . The main problem is the great variability in the rate of eradication.
Methods : A group of 287 consecutive patients with active peptic ulcers and H. pylori infections were admitted to a prospective, randomized, multicentre study, to be given omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus either amoxycillin 1 g b.d. or clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for 2 weeks. Cure was defined as the absence of H. pylori infection, 4–6 weeks after completing anti-microbial therapy, assessed by urease activity and histology of antral and body gastric biopsies.
Results : The bacteria were eradicated in 68/143 patients (48%) treated with amoxycillin and omeprazole and 70/144 patients (49%) treated with clarithromycin and omeprazole (intention-to-treat analysis). The ulcers were healed in 118/127 patients (93%) treated with amoxycillin and in 115/123 (94%) of those treated with clarithromycin. Undesirable effects were rare with both treatments.
Conclusions : Combined treatment with omeprazole plus either amoxycillin or clarithromycin produced a high percentage of short-term healing of ulcers and was well tolerated, but is not useful as first-line anti- Helicobacter pylori treatment.     

Recurrence of duodenal ulcer after Helicobacter pylori eradication is related to high acid output

Background : Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the recurrence of duodenal ulcers. It is unclear why duodenal ulcers rarely recur in the absence of reinfection with H. pylori or NSAID treatment.
Methods : Basal, gastrin-releasing peptide- and pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid outputs in patients with ulcer relapse after H. pylori eradication were measured, and compared with patients without ulcer relapse after H. pylori eradication.
Results : Pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output was significantly higher in H. pylori -positive patients with duodenal ulcers than in H. pylori -negative controls, and fell significantly after H. pylori eradication. In H. pylori -negative patients with recurrent duodenal ulcers, pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output was significantly higher than in controls and similar to H. pylori -positive patients with duodenal ulcers.
Conclusions : These findings suggest that duodenal ulcer relapse after eradication of H. pylori may be related to high pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output. In this subset of patients with duodenal ulcers, maintenance anti-secretory treatment may be necessary to prevent relapse.     

Comparison of lansoprazole-based triple and dual therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer: an Asian multicentre double-blind randomized placebo controlled study

BAKCGROUND: In Asian countries with limited resources, clarithromycin-based triple therapy may not be readily available. There are also few direct comparisons of different regimens in Asia. AIM: To compare two lansoprazole-based non-clarithromycin triple therapies and one dual therapy in a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing. METHODS: Fourteen centres in Asia participated in this study. Patients with acute duodenal ulcer who were H. pylori-positive were recruited. They were randomized to receive: (a) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (LAM-2 W), or (b) LAM for 1 week and placebo (LAM-1 W), or (c) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and placebo for 2 weeks (LA-2 W). Upper endoscopy was repeated at week 6 to check for duodenal ulcer healing. Symptoms and side-effects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were recruited, and two patients took less than 50% of the drugs. H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat) were 68 out of 82 (83%) with LAM-2 W, 55 out of 71 (78%) with LAM-1 W and 43 out of 75 (57%) with LA-2 W. There were significant differences (P=0. 001) in eradication rates when comparing either LAM-2 W or LAM-1 W with LA-2 W. The eradication rate in patients with metronidazole resistant H. pylori strains were significantly lower than those with metronidazole sensitive strains (P=0.0001). The duodenal ulcer healing rates at week 6 were 85%, 85% and 72% in LAM-2 W, LAM-1 W and LA-2 W, respectively (P=0.065). Side-effects occurred in 13%, 11% and 9% in LAM-2 W, LAM-1 W and LA-2 W, respectively. H. pylori eradication and initial ulcer size were factors affecting duodenal ulcer healing. CONCLUSIONS: This Asian multicentre study showed that 1-week lansoprazole-based triple therapy without clarithromycin has similar efficacy in H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing compared with a 2-week regimen. Both triple therapies were significantly better than dual therapy in H. pylori eradication. Therefore, 1-week lansoprazole-based triple therapy is as safe and effective as 2-week therapy in eradication of H. pylori infection and healing of duodenal ulcer in these Asian centres.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication using one-week low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or azithromycin

Aim : To evaluate and compare two 1-week low-dose triple therapies based on lansoprazole, amoxycillin and a macrolide in eradicating Helicobacter pylori .
Methods : Seventy consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms with H. pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: (A) (LAC; n =35) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, amoxycillin 1000 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., all for 7 days; and (B) (LAA; n =35) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily and amoxycillin 1000 mg b.d., both for 7 days, plus azithromycin 500 mg once daily for only 3 days. The H. pylori status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry and 8 weeks after treatment.
Results : Three patients did not complete the treatment: one in the LAC group was withdrawn owing to severe side-effects; two patients in the LAA group stopped the treatment prematurely. H. pylori eradication was obtained in 28 of 34 (82%; 95% CI=66–93%) patients in the LAC group and in 20 of 33 (61%; 95% CI=42–77%) patients in the LAA group. The difference is significant ( P <0.029). On intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of eradication were (28 of 35 patients, 80% in the LAC group and 20 of 35 patients, 57% in the LAA group. Side-effects occurred in nine (26%) and six (18%) patients in the LAC and LAA groups, respectively.
Conclusions : Low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin is more effective than low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and azithromycin, but it gave a greater incidence of side-effects.     

Does eradication of Helicobacter pylori alone heal duodenal ulcers?

BACKGROUND: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection prevents duodenal ulcer (DU) relapse, but it remains uncertain whether eradication of H. pylori alone heals duodenal ulceration. AIM: To test the hypothesis that eradication of H. pylori infection is accompanied by healing of duodenal ulcer. METHODS: A total of 115 consecutive patients with endoscopically confirmed H. pylori-infected duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group BTC patients received a 1-week course of colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg b.d., tinidazole 500 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. Group OBTC patients received omeprazole 20 mg daily for 4 weeks with the BTC regimen during the first week. Endoscopy with antral biopsies and 13C-urea breath test (UBT) were performed before and 4 weeks after completion of the 7-day triple or quadruple therapy. RESULTS: Eight patients dropped out (four in BTC and four in OBTC). Duodenal ulcer healing rates on an intention-to-treat basis in BTC and OBTC were 86% (95% CI: 77-95%) and 90% (95% CI: 82-98%), respectively. The eradication rates of H. pylori on an intention-to-treat basis in BTC and OBTC were 88% (95% CI: 79-96%) and 91% (95% CI: 84-99%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in ulcer healing rates and eradication rates between these two groups (P > 0.05). Epigastric pain resolved more rapidly in patients assigned to OBTC compared with those assigned to BTC. Both of the two regimens were well tolerated with only minor side-effects (3% of the 115 patients) and the compliance was good. CONCLUSIONS: BTC is a very effective H. pylori eradication regimen. Almost all duodenal ulcers heal spontaneously after cure of H. pylori infection using a 1-week low-dose bismuth-based triple therapy. Treating duodenal ulcer with simultaneous administration of omeprazole achieves ulcer pain relief more rapidly.     

Novel therapeutic approaches to gastric and duodenal ulcers: an update

Over the last 25 years, a remarkable revolution in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers has occurred. Effective therapies were developed not only to heal ulcers, but also to cure most patients. The two principal causes for gastric and duodenal ulcers are either infection with Helicobacter pylori or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). With H. pylori eradication, gastric and duodenal ulcers are rapidly becoming historical diseases. This communication reviews the salient pharmacology of the novel anti-ulcer drugs currently in development, with particular emphasis on the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Intense research is currently focused on the development of proton pump inhibitors primarily for the treatment and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The older proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole and lansoprazole, are effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers. Furthermore, both drugs are effective in eradicating H. pylori when given with various antibiotics. Pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole are new proton pump inhibitors, which appear to have comparable therapeutic profiles with omeprazole and lansoprazole. Rebamipide is a new mucosal protective drug, which is effective in healing gastric ulcers. Polaprezinc and nocloprost are also mucosal protective drugs, which are in clinical development. However, none of these three cytoprotective drugs have been evaluated for their efficacy in eradicating H. pylori when given in combination with antibiotics. Likewise, no published literature exists on the use of these drugs for preventing NSAID-induced ulcers. With the rapid eradication of H. pylori currently happening in the developed world, the therapeutic challenge is now directed toward preventing NSAID-associated ulcer. Significant reduction of NSAID-induced ulcers is achieved by using continuous prophylactic anti-ulcer therapy (misoprostol or omeprazole) or by using NSAIDs possessing selective COX-2 inhibitory activity. However, outcome clinical studies are needed to compare the adjuvant anti-ulcer therapies given with COX-1 inhibitors versus the selective COX-2 inhibitors given alone.     

Novel therapeutic approaches to gastric and duodenal ulcers: an update

Over the last 25 years, a remarkable revolution in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers has occurred. Effective therapies were developed not only to heal ulcers, but also to cure most patients. The two principal causes for gastric and duodenal ulcers are either infection with Helicobacter pylori or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). With H. pylori eradication, gastric and duodenal ulcers are rapidly becoming historical diseases. This communication reviews the salient pharmacology of the novel anti-ulcer drugs currently in development, with particular emphasis on the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Intense research is currently focused on the development of proton pump inhibitors primarily for the treatment and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The older proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole and lansoprazole, are effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers. Furthermore, both drugs are effective in eradicating H. pylori when given with various antibiotics. Pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole are new proton pump inhibitors, which appear to have comparable therapeutic profiles with omeprazole and lansoprazole. Rebamipide is a new mucosal protective drug, which is effective in healing gastric ulcers. Polaprezinc and nocloprost are also mucosal protective drugs, which are in clinical development. However, none of these three cytoprotective drugs have been evaluated for their efficacy in eradicating H. pylori when given in combination with antibiotics. Likewise, no published literature exists on the use of these drugs for preventing NSAID-induced ulcers. With the rapid eradication of H. pylori currently happening in the developed world, the therapeutic challenge is now directed toward preventing NSAID-associated ulcer. Significant reduction of NSAID-induced ulcers is achieved by using continuous prophylactic anti-ulcer therapy (misoprostol or omeprazole) or by using NSAIDs possessing selective COX-2 inhibitory activity. However, outcome clinical studies are needed to compare the adjuvant anti-ulcer therapies given with COX-1 inhibitors versus the selective COX-2 inhibitors given alone.